Upload
melvin-morgan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Literacy 101Course Outline
Understanding makes reading worthwhile and fun . . .
Designer: Ani Campbell
Introduction
The purpose of Literacy 101 is to encourage and advance 9th grade literacy
Course Outline
• Description• Course Goal• Objectives• Performance Objectives• Learning Activities• Learning Assessment Tools• Course Evaluation
Click on a link to go directly to that section
Literacy 101 is based on Moore and Kearsley’s theory of Transactional Distance. (Dick, Carey, & Carey, 2003, p. 96). It follows a constructivist approach, thus making it a ‘learner centered’ approach rather than a ‘job skills’ approach.
Teaching modules are based on the following components:
Description
Literacy 101 was designed for use by instructors of 9th grade English. It may also be adapted for use in teaching literacy to other high school grades and adults.
Course Goal
To lessen (and in the case of some students, eliminate) the gap between the national standard for reading, comprehension and/or writing abilities of 9th grade students, and their actual abilities in the stated areas of literacy.
Objectives
Assess initial reading/comprehension abilities of students
Provide students with learning plan Teach visualization Teach recognition of genres Increase student vocabulary Provide students with appropriate
literary works
Setting objectives will ensure that instructors meet the goal of the course
Objectives -- (Continued)
Assess student progression Advance levels of teaching as
appropriate Final analysis of student learning Course evaluation
Performance Objectives
Obtain understanding of student level of ability
Student understands purpose of portfolio
Student to grasp concept of visualization
Student to recognize basic genres
Student increases vocabulary by minumum of 10 words
Whether students are informed of performance objectives or not, they should be included in the lesson plan so that measurement may be taken at each teaching module.
Performance Objectives -- (Cont.)
Student reads minimum of 3 works during semester
Student to recognize his/her progression
Student is empowered to select advanced reading
Student is encouraged by his/her progress
Student adds input to improve the course
Learning Activities
Online literacy assessment exercise Students maintain portfolio of their progress Online activity associating words with
appropriate visuals Provide students with lecture or other
description of various genre Provide students with short pieces from each
genre Assess understanding with matching quiz
Select words from among works studied
Learning activities are based on the course and performance objectives, and should be designed to meet those objectives while enhancing student learning. Learning should be fun!
Learning Activities (cont.)
Students to read from suggested works Students may suggest alternative reading. Proceed
upon approval of instructor One-on-one discussion with students
Quiz (either oral or written) to assess comprehension Provide advanced levels of reading as
appropriate Final one-on-one with students
Quiz or written essay to assess comprehension of latest work read
Students to complete online evaluation (eg. Zoomerang)
Learning Assessment Tools
Portfolio Oral questions Short answer and essay questions Online assessments Group discussions Student-teacher discussions Grading rubric Written papers Team projects
Sources: http://www.letsgolearn.com/teacher.html
These tools follow an holistic and constructivist approach to teaching. They mirror formats that students will face in the work environment.
Learning Objectives
Determine initial level of learner ability
Determine best exercise(s) to increase learner ability
Assess advanced abilities Promote further learning Bring students to 9th grade ability
and beyond (if applicable)
Course Evaluation
Online evaluation survey Student self-assessments
The success or failure of a course is made evident by the ability of students to learn, to gain confidence in the material studied, and to be motivated to continue learning. A well-designed end-of-course evaluation will provide the instructor with the necessary feedback that s/he needs to improve instruction.
References
• Brown University (2005, March). Literacy: Introduction. Retrieved March 21, 2005, from http://www.alliance.brown.edu/topics/literacy.shtml
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2003). Sections One - Six. In (Ed.), Courseware Authoring (Custom Edition for University of Phoenix ed., pp. 3-168). Boston,
Massachusetts: Pearson Custom Publishing.• Lewin, T. (2004, April 14). In Cities, a Battle to Improve
Teenage Literacy. Retrieved February 21, 2005, from http://www.susanohanian.org/atrocity_fetch.php?id=2214