19
2 - Ashby Method 2.3 - Materials Selection for best performance Outline Resources: M. F. Ashby, “Materials Selection in Mechanical Design” Butterworth Heinemann, 1999 Chapters 5 and 6 • The Cambridge Material Selector (CES) software -- Granta Design, Cambridge (www.grantadesign.com) Deriving performance indices Performance maximizing criteria Selection with multiple constraints

lol

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

well

Citation preview

  • 2 - Ashby Method

    2.3 - Materials Selection for best performance

    Outline

    Resources: M. F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design Butterworth Heinemann, 1999

    Chapters 5 and 6 The Cambridge Material Selector (CES) software -- Granta Design, Cambridge

    (www.grantadesign.com)

    Deriving performance indices

    Performance maximizing criteria

    Selection with multiple constraints

  • Materials selection and function

    Design involves choosing a material, process and part shape to perform some function.

    Function dictates the choice of both materials and shape. In many cases materials choice is not directly dependent of

    shape.

    Performance Indices

    Minimum cost

    Minimumweight

    Maximum energy storage

    Minimum environ. impact

    FUNCTION

    OBJECTIVE

    CONSTRAINTS

    INDEX

    Tie

    Beam

    Shaft

    Column

    Mechanical,Thermal,

    Electrical...

    Stiffnessspecified

    Strengthspecified

    Fatigue limit

    Geometryspecified

    =

    y

    M

    Minimise this!

    Each combination ofFunctionObjectiveConstraintFree variable

    Has a characterising material index

  • Performance Indices

    Performance Indices

  • Performance Indices

    Deriving Performance Indices: Procedure

    Identify the attribute to be maximized or minimized (weight, cost, energy, stiffness, strength, safety, environmental damage, etc.).

    Develop an equation for this attribute in terms of the functional requirements, the geometry and the material properties (the objective function).

    Identify the free (unspecified) variables. Identify the constraints; rank them in order of

    importance.

  • Develop equations for the constraints (no yield; no fracture; no buckling, maximum heat capacity, cost below target, etc.).

    Substitute for the free variables from the constraints into the objective function.

    Group the variables into three groups: functional requirements, F, geometry, G, and material properties, M, thus, we can write:

    p = f1(F) f2 (G) f3 (M) Read off the performance index, expressed as a quantity f3 (M),

    to be minimized or maximized.

    Deriving Performance Indices: Procedure

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

  • Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    Minimize mass, m , of a solid cylindrical tie rod of length L, which carries a tensile force F with safety factor Sf. The mass is given by:

    m = A L

    where A is the area of the cross-section and is the density. This is called the Objective Function

    The length L and force F are specified; the radius r is free.

    The section must, however, be sufficient to carry the tensile load F, requiring that:

    F / A = f / Sf

    where f is the failure strength.

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    Eliminating A between these two equations gives:

    m = ( Sf F ) ( L ) { / f } or Note the form of this result.

    The first bracket contains the functional requirementthat the specified load is safely supported.

    The second bracket contains the specified geometry(the length of the tie).

    The last bracket contains the material properties.

    =

    yFLm

  • Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    We want to minimize the performance, m , while meeting the functional and geometric requirements.This means we want the smallest value of { / f } or the largest value of

    M = f /

    Ashby defines this latter quantity as the performance index.

    Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Length L is specified Must not fail under load F Adequate fracture toughness

    Material choice Section area A

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

    STEP 1Identify function, constraints, objective and free variables

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

  • Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m:m = A L (1)

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Length L is specified Must not fail under load F Adequate fracture toughness

    Material choice Section area A

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

    STEP 2Define equation for objective -- the performance equation

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m:m = A L (1)

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Length L is specified Must not fail under load F Adequate fracture toughness

    Material choice Section area A

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

    STEP 3If the performance equationcontains a free variable other than material, identify the constraint that limits it

    Equation for constraint on A: F/A < y (2)

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

  • Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m:m = A L (1)

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Length L is specified Must not fail under load F Adequate fracture toughness

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

    Equation for constraint on A: F/A < y (2)

    STEP 4Use this constraint to eliminate the free variable in performance equation

    Material choice Section area A;

    eliminate in (1) using (2):

    =

    yFLm

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m:m = A L (1)

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Length L is specified Must not fail under load F Adequate fracture toughness

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

    Equation for constraint on A: F/A < y (2) STEP 5

    Read off the combination of material properties that maximise performance

    Material choice Section area A;

    eliminate in (1) using (2):

    =

    yFLm

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

  • Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m:m = A L (1)

    Strong tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Length L is specified Must not fail under load F Adequate fracture toughness

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    m = massA = areaL = length = density

    = yield strengthy

    Equation for constraint on A: F/A < y (2)

    PERFORMANCEINDEX

    Material choice Section area A;

    eliminate in (1) using (2):

    =

    yFLm Chose materials with smallest

    y

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong tie

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, stiff tie

    Tie-rod

    Minimise mass m:m = A L (1)

    =

    ESLm 2

    Stiff tie of length L and minimum mass

    L

    FF

    Area A

    Material choice Section area A; eliminate in (1) using (2):

    Function

    Objective

    Constraints

    Free variables

    Chose materials with smallest

    E

    m = massA = areaL = length = densityS = stiffnessE = Youngs Modulus

    Stiffness of the tie S:

    LAES = (2)

  • Performance Indices for weight: Tie

    Function Stiffness Strength

    Tension (tie)

    Bending (beam)

    Bending (panel)

    Cost, CmDensity, Modulus, EStrength, yEndurance limit, eThermal conductivity, T- expansion coefficient,

    the Physicists view of materials, e.g.Material properties --

    the Engineers view of materialsMaterial indices --

    /E y/1/2

    /E 2/3y/

    Objective: minimise mass

    Minimise these!

    1/3/E 1/2y/

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, stiff beam

    m = massA = areaL = length = densityb = edge lengthS = stiffnessI = second moment of areaE = Youngs Modulus

    Beam (solid square section).

    Stiffness of the beam S:

    I is the second moment of area:

    Material choice. Edge length b. Combining the equations gives:

    3LIECS =

    12bI

    4=

    = 2/1

    2/15

    ECLS12

    m

    == LbLAm 2

    Chose materials with smallest

    2/1E

    b

    b

    L

    F

    Minimise mass, m, where:

    Function

    Objective

    Constraint

    Free variables

  • Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong beam

    m = massA = areaL = length = densityb = edge lengthI = second moment of areay = yield strength

    Beam (solid square section).

    Must not fail under load F

    I is the second moment of area:

    Material choice. Edge length b. Combining the equations gives:

    =

    > 3y b3FL

    Ib/2M

    12bI

    4=

    ( ) ( )

    = 2/3

    y

    2/35/3

    3FLm

    == LbLAm 2

    Chose materials with smallest

    2/3

    y

    b

    b

    L

    F

    Minimise mass, m, where:

    Function

    Objective

    Constraint

    Free variables

    Performance Indices for weight: Beam

    Function Stiffness Strength

    Tension (tie)

    Bending (beam)

    Bending (panel)

    Cost, CmDensity, Modulus, EStrength, yEndurance limit, eThermal conductivity, T- expansion coefficient,

    the Physicists view of materials, e.g.Material properties --

    the Engineers view of materialsMaterial indices --

    /E y/1/2

    /E 2/3y/

    Objective: minimise mass

    Minimise these!

    1/3/E 1/2y/

  • Deriving Performance Indices: Light, stiff panel

    m = massw = widthL = length = densityt = thicknessS = stiffnessI = second moment of areaE = Youngs Modulus

    Panel with given width w and length L

    Stiffness of the panel S:

    I is the second moment of area:

    3LIECS =

    12twI3

    =

    tw

    = 3/1

    23/12

    EL

    CwS12

    m

    L

    F

    == LtwLAm

    Chose materials with smallest

    3/1E

    Material choice. Panel thickness t. Combining the equations gives:

    Minimise mass, m, where

    Function

    Objective

    Constraint

    Free variables

    Deriving Performance Indices: Light, strong panel

    m = massw = widthL = length = densityt = thicknessI = second moment of areay = yield strength

    Panel with given width w and length L

    Must not fail under load F

    I is the second moment of area:

    12twI3

    =

    tw

    ( ) ( )

    = 1/2

    y

    3/21/2

    L3Fwm

    L

    F

    == LtwLAm

    Material choice. Panel thickness t. Combining the equations gives:

    Minimise mass, m, where

    Function

    Objective

    Constraint

    Free variables

    =

    > 2y wt3FL

    It/2M

    Chose materials with smallest

    1/2

    y

  • Performance Indices for weight: Panel

    Function Stiffness Strength

    Tension (tie)Bending (beam)Bending (panel)

    Cost, CmDensity, Modulus, EStrength, yEndurance limit, eThermal conductivity, T- expansion coefficient,

    the Physicists view of materials, e.g.Material properties --

    the Engineers view of materialsMaterial indices --

    /E y/1/2

    /E 2/3y/

    Objective: minimise mass

    Minimise these!

    1/3/E 1/2y/

    Minimum cost

    Minimumweight

    Maximum energy storage

    Minimum environ. impact

    FUNCTION

    OBJECTIVE

    CONSTRAINTS

    INDEX

    Tie

    Beam

    Shaft

    Column

    Mechanical,Thermal,

    Electrical...

    Stiffnessspecified

    Strengthspecified

    Fatigue limit

    Geometryspecified

    = 2/1E

    M

    Minimise this!

    Optimised selection using charts

    b

    b

    L

    F

  • Optimised selection using charts

    Index 1/2EM =

    22 M/E =

    ( ) ( ) ( )MLog2Log2ELog =

    Contours of constantM are lines of slope 2

    on an E- chart

    CE 2/1

    =

    0.1

    10

    1

    100

    Metals

    Polymers

    Elastomers

    Woods

    Composites

    Foams0.01

    1000

    1000.1 1 10Density (Mg/m3)

    Young

    s m

    odu

    lus

    E, (G

    Pa)

    Ceramics

    2

    Optimised selection using charts

    Index 1/2EM =

    22 M/E =

    ( ) ( ) ( )MLog2Log2ELog =

    0.1

    10

    1

    100

    Metals

    Polymers

    Elastomers

    Woods

    Composites

    Foams

    1000

    1000.1 1 10

    Density (Mg/m3)

    Young

    s m

    odu

    lus

    E, (G

    Pa)

    Ceramics

    2

    y = a x + b

    = Log() = -1 0 1

    Contours of constantM are lines of slope 2

    on an E- chart

    y = Log (E)

    x = Log ()

  • Optimised selection using charts

    Index 1/2EM =

    22 M/E =

    ( ) ( ) ( )MLog2Log2ELog =

    0.1

    10

    1

    100

    Metals

    Polymers

    Elastomers

    Woods

    Composites

    Foams

    1000

    1000.1 1 10

    Density (Mg/m3)

    Young

    s m

    odu

    lus

    E, (G

    Pa)

    Ceramics

    2

    y = a x + b

    =

    b = 1-2Log(M) =1M = 10-1/2 = 0.31

    y = Log (E)

    x = Log ()

    Log() = -1 0 1

    Optimised selection using charts

    Index 1/2EM =

    22 M/E =

    ( ) ( ) ( )MLog2Log2ELog =

    0.1

    10

    1

    100

    Metals

    Polymers

    Elastomers

    Woods

    Composites

    Foams

    1000

    1000.1 1 10

    Density (Mg/m3)

    Young

    s m

    odu

    lus

    E, (G

    Pa)

    Ceramics

    2y = a x + b

    =

    b = 2-2Log(M) =2M = 10-1 = 0.1

    Minimising M

    y = Log (E)

    x = Log ()

    Log() = -1 0 1

  • Minimum cost

    Minimumweight

    Maximum energy storage

    Minimum environ. impact

    FUNCTION

    OBJECTIVE

    CONSTRAINTS

    INDEX Stiffnessspecified

    Strengthspecified

    Fatigue limit

    Geometryspecified

    ( )[ ]EfM ,=

    Minimise this!

    Each combination ofFunctionObjectiveConstraintFree variable

    Has a characterising material index

    Performance Indices for weight: Stiffness

    Performance Indices for weight: Stiffness

    Function Stiffness Strength

    Tension (tie)Bending (beam)Bending (panel)

    Cost, CmDensity, Modulus, EStrength, yEndurance limit, eThermal conductivity, T- expansion coefficient,

    the Physicists view of materials, e.g.Material properties --

    the Engineers view of materialsMaterial indices --

    /E y/1/2

    /E 2/3y/

    Objective: minimise mass

    Minimise these!

    1/3/E 1/2y/

  • Performance Indices for weight: Stiffness

    Index 1/2EM =

    22 M/E =

    ( ) ( ) ( )MLog2Log2ELog =

    Contours of constantM are lines of slope 2

    on an E- chart

    CE

    =

    CE 2/1

    =

    CE 3/1

    =

    0.1

    10

    1

    100

    Metals

    Polymers

    Elastomers

    Woods

    Composites

    Foams0.01

    1000

    1000.1 1 10Density (Mg/m3)

    Young

    s m

    odu

    lus

    E, (G

    Pa)

    Ceramics

    12 3

    Performance Indices for weight

  • Deriving Performance Indices for Cost and Energy

    To minimize Cost use the indices for minimum weight, replacing density by C, where C is the cost per kg.

    To minimize Energy use the indices for minimum weight, replacing density by q, where q is the energy content per kg.

    M = / f M = C / f

    M = / f M = q / f