Upload
trinhphuc
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Long Term Flexure of the Crust and Sismogenesis, Application to the San Andreas Fault (California)
Laetitia Le Pourhiet*, Evgenii Burov
Laboratoire de tectonique Univ. P. et M. Curie Paris [email protected]
Elastic Strength of the crust as A link Between Quakes and Geodynamics?The simplest rheological model for the crust in shear is:
visco - elasto - Brittle
Elastic Flexure Controls the orientation of joints
Elastic Strain are small, However OnLy Elasticity may store energyOver Long time scale...
And Therefore ... .... the fluid Path ways
T53C-1955Long Term Flexure of the Crust and Sismogenesis, Application to the San Andreas Fault (California)
ABSTRACT: However, flexure affects the orientation and magnitude of principal stresses acting within the continental crust. We try to highlight some quantitative and putative links between flexure, the me-chanical behavior of faults,their seismic activity at smaller time scale and to apply them to the well do-cumented San Andreas Fault. First impact of flexure is that it allows building differential stresses both at the surface and at the base of an elastic plate without loading it in the center.
0 1 2 3 4 51
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
shear strain %
maj
or p
rinci
pal s
tres
s ou
tsid
e
30°
2 1 0normal stress
3 2 1 00
0.5
1
1.5
22.5
5 4 3 2 1 0
1 00
0.5
1
normal stress
shea
r str
ess
Strength at yield Stregth after 5 % shear strain on the fault
Grgz
=100
shea
r str
ess
M.C. plasticity for preexiting faults
Faults and Quakes: A pseudo-static point of view
I Continuum mechanics applies. Faults have a thickness in which Morh Coulomb elastic-plastic rheology applies and diplacement on the interfaces between the fault and surrounding media is compatible shear and normal com-ponent of the stress on the fault plane are continuous, only the fault parallel stress component can be dicontinuous.
stable plastic creep
yL
x
y
σyy < σxx
x
Coulomb
0 2 4 6 8 100
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
μeff
εii %
0
2
4
-1
γxy %
μres
tan Ψ
L
x
y
L
x
yL
x
Roscoe
zone of possible slip instability
x
σ1
σ3
σyy > σxx
Byerlee friction is mesured at peak
However, asumimg continuity of stress there are many possible state possible inside the fault (red circle) Therefore, this effective friction does not tell anything about the strength of the fault (the radius of the red circle).
Fortunately, using a full rheological computation instead of solely a rupture criteria it is possible to get more informations
Inverting strain mesurements issued from borehole breakouts, earthquake focal mechanism or microfracture one can get a the orientation of principal stress axis in the surrounding of faults.
Comparing this orientation to the orientation of the fault one finds the effective friction of the fault.
well oriented fault (plain lines) : friction angle compa-tible with lab experiments allows for larger stress drop and favor slip instability.
very badly oriented fault (dashed lines) cause harde-ning and allow stable creep to occur only for effective friction approx. equal to the orientation vs. s1). For higher effective friction new fault form.
Stress is allowed to rotate within the shear band, depen-ding on the sense of rotation, the deviatoric stress in the surrounding elastic media will rise (hardening) or drop (softening)
Cited References Atwater T. & Stock J.M. - 1998 , Pacific–North America plate tectonics of the Neogene southwestern United States: an update, Int. Geol. Rev. 40 , pp. 375–402. Boyd et al - 2004; Foundering lithosphere imaged beneath the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA, Science 305 (5684), pp. 660–662.Hill et al. 1990; Seismicity 1980-1986 in The San Andreas fault system, California; USGS professional paper 1515 , p115-151Kwon Y.W. & Bang H.- 1997 The finite Element Method Using Matlab CRC press p 366-369Le Pourhiet et al. 2006; Mantle instability beneath the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California and Death Valley exten-sion; EPSL 251 p 104-119Leroy Y and Ortiz M -1989; Localization Analysis under Dynamic Loading; INST PHYS CONF SER (102): 257-265Rice J. 1992; Chapter 20: Fault stress state, pore pressure distribution and the weakness of the San andreas faults in fault mechanics and transport properties of rocks eds B. Evans& T-F Wong Academic press ltd- p476 -503Saleeby J and Foster Z. -2004 ; Topographic response to mantle lithosphere removal in the southern Sierra Nevada region, California Geology 32 p. 245-248Sibson R. -1990; rupture nucleation on unfavorably oriented faults; BSSA 80, pp. 1580-1604Sibson R. -2003Brittle-failure controls on maximum sustainable overpressure in different tectonic regimes , AAPG Bulle-tin, v. 87, pp. 901–908Townend and Zoback,- 2001 in The Nature and Tectonic Significance of Fault Zone Weakening R. E. Holdsworth, R. A. Strachan, J. F. Maglouhlin, J. F. Knipe, Eds. , vol. 186, pp. 13-21.Thurber C. et al.- 2006; Three dimensional speed model earthquake relocations and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield california region BSSA 96, pS38-S49Unruh J. , -1991; The uplift of the Sierra Nevada and implications for Late Cenozoic epeirogeny in the western Cordillera, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 103 pp. 1395–1404.
10°
15°
Rice J. 1992Sibson R. -1990
Application to the San Adreas Fault
The San Andreas Fault is a system of dextral strike slip faults which runs from the Gulf of California (Mexico) to the Mendicino triple junction (Washington, USA). This plate boundary has been initiated 30 Myr ago as the ridge, which separated the Faralon plate from the Pacific plate, collided with the North American Plate (Atwater and Stokes 1998). The fault is segmented along strike and we are mainly interested with three segments which are located along the border of the Sierra Nevada micro-plate. In this area, the main fault is orthogonal to the regional maximum horizontal stress (Towend and Zoback 2001 ) and has there-fore been recognized as a weak fault . However, the apparent frictional weakness of the fault does not prevent big earthqua-kes such as the one which destroy San Fran-cisco in 1906 to occur In the middle of those two seismic segments, a 150 km long segment is creeping aseismically from Park-field to San Juan Bautista. A question arises from those observations: what factor con-trols the apparent contrasting behavior of the fault along strike.
QUAKES
150 KM
Hill et al 1990
Seismic tomography outlines the presence of a fast body sinking toward the east beneath the Great Valley
while
Reciever functions show that East of this ano-maly, the Moho has very weak signature. Both are interpreted as the signature of the re-moval of the ultra-mafic root of the Sierra Nevada Batholith.
Parkfield S.Creeping S. Cholame S. 1857 break
1966
20041984-2004
2004-2006
Lowest Point in the US
Highest point in the US
Convective Instability
Creeping segment
300 km
DRIPS
Boyd et al 2004
FLEXURE
Geomorphology coupled with stratigra-phy clearly indicate:
1 : A long term (5-10 Myr) flexural tilt of the Sierra Nevada micro-plate all along its axis
2 : A recent increase of the downward tilt at the level outlined by the red rectangle
The creeping segment is an 150km long band which concentrates a lot of seismicity at shallow (<12km) depths. It contrast with the size mean size of the body of ophilite in the Franciscan Complex. (see the ultra maphic body on the general map of california).
The seismic activity of this segment contrasts with its surrounding segments which rup-tured with destructive earthquakes ( Loma Prieta (1989), San Francisco (1906) and Carrizo Plain (1857)) .
126
°W
124
°W
122
°W
120
°W 1
18°W
34°
N
36°
N
38°
N
40°
N 4
2°N
SFSJB
3.5 cm/yr (vs SN)
GREAT VALLEY
a
a’
b
b’
Tulare
SIERRA NEVADA MOUNTAINS
SAF 1857
1906 SAF
Pkd
PAC
Eastern California Shear Zone
CMa0
Coast Ranges
Mantle Drip −140
−120
−100
−80
−60
−40
−20
0
Dep
th (k
m)
400600
800
1000
1200
Mantle S.N. BatholithCrustgranitecpx-gt root
Great ValleyBasin and Range
lithospheredepleted
S.N.SAF Coalinga
−50 0 50 100 150 200 250
a a’a0A
50MPa
-50MPaBending stressnormal to the SAF
comp.tens.
0
100
2000
100200
300400
500600
700
Dep
th
-100
SAF
km
km
kma
b
PkdSJB
σv σ1+Bσ1+Bσ3 σ1-Bσ1-B σ1σ1
σv ~ σ3 σv > σ3τ
σn
B
500 1000
M>33>M>22>M>11>M
0
5
10
15
N events
dept
h (k
m)
A B C
~8 km
a
a’ ESFS
b
b’
Drip pull
MODELING IT
A Coincidence OR Not ? The Facts...
Do We Observe That Somewhere ?
fau
lt c
ore
Dammage Zone
Elastic media
fau
lt c
ore
Dammage Zone
Elastic media
Elastic media
fau
lt c
ore
Dammage Zone
SticK-Slip
Fluid barrier
lithostatichydrostatic
water discharge
slow refilling of the reservoir
slow refilling of the reservoir
Fluid barrierreforms
slow refilling of the reservoir
t1t0 t2
tQ
tQ
t2
t1
t0
fluid pressure
II Although it is possible to trigger a slip instability in a hardening material under dynamic loading (i.e. during an earth quake, see Leroy and Ortiz 1989). There should be an initial zone (patch) in which slip instability occurs in the static regime to initiate an earthquake. Hence, the initiation of earthquake necessite some effec-tive strain softening.
III This initial strain softening cannot be related to a modification of the nominal/ lab friction of the material be-cause: a) it is reproducible (happend at each rupture) b) the amount of strain is small (otherwise there would be significant precursor to earthquakes)Hence, I favour structural softening effects over wear.
IV High fluid pressure, nearly lithostatic, may only be sustained if the sealing is in a compressive setting (Sibson 2003)
Effective Friction, stress inversions Mechanical Statements
τ
σn2θ
ΔPf
φfault=φB
τ
σn2θ
ΔPf =0
φBφfault=φeff
τ
σn2θ
ΔPf
φBφfault>φeff?
?
?
Localisation of the different modelsand observations
Results of the 2D Plane strain Thermo-mechanical Model
Results of 2D plane stress Modeldetermining flexural bending dueto convective instability
Parametric Study of the effect of coupling and plate thickness
Variation of jointing along the strike of the SAF causes the contrastingSeismic behavior from "aseismic" Creep to destructive Earth Quakes
Presented Model
As the state of stress Changes with depth favoring vertical joints in the extrado and horizontal joints in the intrado, the depth of formation of fluid barriers which help maintaining fluid over pressure up to lithostatic level, i.e. low effective strength, happens to be control by flexure. This Model seems to apply at least for strike slip faults like the San Andreas fault.
Sibson R. -2003
Thurber et al 2006
Saleeby et Foster 2004
Le Pourhiet et al 2006