Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FREE Publication Publication Permit PP19508/08/2019(035103)
MALAYSIA AS AN IDEAL
FDI HOST AMIDST COVID-19
Also in this Issue :
KEY INCENTIVES FOR
MANUFACTURING & SERVICES SECTOR IN MALAYSIA … PG 5
SC’s LATEST GUIDELINES ON CONDUCT OF DIRECTORS … PG 12
| HHQ FACTS | RESCHEDULING & RESTRUCTURING OF LOANS … PG 15
| CASE HIGHLIGHT | Real Estate POWER OF HOUSING CONTROLLER TO GRANT EXTENSION OF TIME … PG 16
A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER BY HALIM HONG & QUEK
| VOLUME 3 | ISSUE NO.7 | JULY 2020 |
hhq.com.my
FOREIGN EXCHANGE POLICY:
RECENT REFINEMENTS BY BNM
From the Editor …
Dear Readers,
We are very delighted to share with you a renewed version of our publication - EMPOWER. This month’s newsletter marks the seventh Issue of the 3rd Volume of EMPOWER, and we cannot thank you enough for the continuous support towards our work. Wish you, our sincerest thank you, nevertheless … Keeping in mind our goal to bring you fresh, engaging, and empowering contents through this publication, we are constantly pushing ourselves to evolve with the current situation.
Hence, we truly hope this month’s EMPOWER will inform you on some of the latest news and key legal & related updates (from a Malaysian perspective), particularly in the sphere of International Trade & Investment. Wish you a fulfilling read!
Till our next Issue …
STAY IN TOUCH!
Kashmir Harbans Singh Editor-in-Chief
FOR SUBSCRIPTION
& ANY COMMENT(S) ON THIS PUBLICATION,
KINDLY REACH US AT
| VOLUME 3 | ISSUE NO. 7 | JULY 2020 |
is a monthly newsletter published by Halim Hong & Quek (HHQ) It is distributed for free and can be read on HHQ’s website - https://hhq.com.my/ All articles in this publication are intended to provide a summary or review of the subject matter and are not intended to be nor should it be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice.
EDITORIAL TEAM CHONG LEE HUI
ANKIT R SANGHVI
TAN POH YEE
LIM YOKE WAH
LOW KHYE YEN
GOH LI FEI
WILLIAM LIM WEI LIE
KELVIN KOAY ZHI SHERN
LEE PEI YING
DESIGN & LAYOUT KASHMIR HARBANS SINGH
CIRCULATION
JOYCE WONG
MAIZATUL AKMAL
MAVIS TAN
\
FOLLOW US, / Halim Hong & Quek/
KUALA LUMPUR OFFICE OFFICE SUITE 19-21-1, LEVEL 21, WISMA UOA CENTRE, 19, JALAN PINANG, 50450 KUALA LUMPUR. T +603 2710 3818 F +603 2710 3820 (Corporate & Real Estate) +603 2161 3821 (Dispute Resolution) E [email protected]
PENANG OFFICE C-11-2, LORONG BAYAN INDAH 3, BAY AVENUE, 11900 BAYAN LEPAS, PULAU PINANG. T +604 640 6818 T +604 640 6817 F +604 640 6819 E [email protected]
JOHOR OFFICE A-2-23 & A-3-23, BLOCK A, PUSAT KOMERSIAL BAYU TASIK, PERSIARAN SOUTHKEY 1, 80150 JOHOR BAHRU, JOHOR. T +607 300 8101 T +607 289 7366 F +607 300 8100 E [email protected]
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
By DATO’ QUEK NGEE MENG
According to UNCTAD’s recent World
Investment Report 2020, the Covid-19
pandemic, along with its consequential
worldwide lockdown measures, supply chain
disruptions and economy slowdown, is bound
to trigger a significant fall of close to 40% in
the global FDI flows1. This plunge is in
comparison to a total of USD1.54 trillion of
global FDI in 2019, which draws this year’s
figure below USD1 trillion for the very first
time since 20052.
Disrupting almost every aspect of our lives, the Covid-19 outbreak is forcing businesses to rethink
their traditional business model, especially those in the tourism industry and its related sectors.
Meanwhile governments of countries recovering from the outbreak are understandably prioritizing
the immediate need to revive and rejuvenate their respective domestic economic performance, with
minimal focus on foreign investments. The escalating trade war and worsening bilateral ties between
the United States and China, the volatile value of crude oil and increasingly unstable costs of
production, have accumulatively affected export-oriented and commodity-linked investments and as
a result adversely strained flows of foreign direct investments (FDI) into developing economies.
In 2019, vigorous investments from major countries like the United
Stated resulted Asia to emerge as the world’s largest FDI host, with
30% of global FDI inflows worth USD474 billion3. FDI inflows into
the region are however projected to decline by up to 45% in 20204.
Whilst FDI flows to some of the ASEAN member states such as
Myanmar, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Thailand
declined last year, investment rates into Malaysia remained flat5.
1 UNCTAD, “World Investment Report 2020”; https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2020_en.pdf 2 Ibid 3 Ibid 4 Ibid 5 ibid
AS AN IDEAL
AMIDST COVID-19
2 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
MALAYSIA
FDI HOST
HOSTHOST
MIDST
COVID-19
Keywords: FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT – economy – tax incentives
Key Resources: UNCTAD World Investment Report 2020 – PENJANA - MIDA
“In 2019, Asia was
the world’s largest
FDI host - attracting
30% of global FDI
inflows worth $474
billion”
~ UNCTAD 2020 ~
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
As at 30 June 2020, Malaysia recorded a sum of
RM37.4 billion worth of approved investments
in the manufacturing, services and primary
sectors in the first quarter of this year, RM26.3
billion of which comprised direct domestic
investment (DDI)6, compared to the
corresponding first quarter of 2019 which
recorded a total of RM21.7 billion of net FDI
inflow alone7.
The Malaysian government will be announcing
related incentives meant for these chosen
industries. To address the present situation, the
recently announced National Economic Plan -
PENJANA8 focuses on bringing overseas
projects and investments back to Malaysia.
Below are some of the tax-based and other
incentives which would apply to foreign MNCs
for investing and/or relocating into Malaysia9:
Like the rest of the world, the Malaysian
government has been strict in shutting down its
international borders since the second quarter of
202010 which has largely caused investors to
reconsider and even postpone their investment
decisions. Nevertheless opportunities of an
economic revival could be in the horizon for
Malaysia given the ongoing re-alignment of
domestic and regional supply chain, increased
reliance on technology to boost efficiency or
outreach, reduction of costs and increased
awareness on health with larger spending on
personal protection equipment and other
hygienic or pharmaceutical products.
A look into the 11th Malaysian Plan as
announced last year suggests that the nation is in
general headed towards the right direction.
Through the said Plan, Malaysia indicated its
focus on developing five main catalytic and high
growth sub-sectors to stimulate its FDI
performance – namely, Electrical and
Electronics, Chemical and Chemical Products,
Machinery and Equipment, Medical Devices
and Aerospace. In the specific context of the
ongoing pandemic, Malaysia has indeed made
the right decision in identifying these strategic
high-growth sub-sectors, such as the production
of medical devices.
6 https://www.mida.gov.my/ 7 https://www.dosm.gov.my/ 8 Ministry of Finance Malaysia, “PENJANA: National Economic Recovery Plan” https://penjana.treasury.gov.my/index-en.html 9 Ministry of Finance Malaysia, “PENJANA: National Economic Recovery Plan” https://penjana.treasury.gov.my/index-en.html 10 All international borders/entries to Malaysia remain closed, at the time of writing
3 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
PENJANA :
INCENTIVES FOR FDI QUANTUM : RM50 million
TIMELINE : July 2020 – Dec 2021
0% TAX RATE FOR 10 YEARS for new investment
in manufacturing sectors with capital investment
between RM300 - RM500 million
100% INVESTMENT TAX ALLOWANCE for 3
years for existing company in Malaysia relocating
overseas facilities into Malaysia with capital
investment above RM300 million
Establishment of Project Acceleration &
Coordination Unit (PACU) at MIDA
MANUFACTURING LICENCE APPROVAL for
non-sensitive industry within 2 working days
SPECIAL REINVESTMENT ALLOWANCE for
manufacturing and selected agriculture activity,
from year 2020 to year 2021
Enhancement of DOMESTIC INVESTMENT
Strategic Fund
0% TAX RATE FOR 15 YEARS for new
investment in manufacturing sectors with capital
investment above RM500 million
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
The PENJANA also allocates additional operating expenditure for Malaysian Investment
Development Authority (MIDA) to undertake promotional activities, whereby its assigned
officials are proactively leading initiatives of targeted marketing and lobbying certain foreign
MNCs. As a result, the Authority reported on 16th July to have identified a total of 433 potential
foreign investment worth RM97.4 billion to be brought into the country11.
Besides these attractive investment incentives launched by the
government, Malaysia’s strength lies fundamentally in its strategic
location within Asia and its rich natural resources. For one, Malaysia
provides ample opportunity for keen investors to explore the emerging
area of agri-technology in sectors of padi, cocoa, rubber, and pepper,
and not forgetting ‘celebrity’ agri-products - durian and palm tree.
With the implementation of a Recovery Movement Control Order since
8th June 2020, majority of economic activities in Malaysia have resumed,
with adherence to standard operating procedures in place. This includes
continuance of some of the mega domestic railway link infrastructure
projects namely the ECRL, MRT 2 and LRT 3. With prominent
infrastructure projects in the pipeline, such as the Johor Bahru-Singapore
Rapid Transit System, and hopefully with the continuance of KL-
Singapore High Speed Rail, the infrastructural enrichment within the
nation would serve as a catalyst for FDI inflow.
By and large, Malaysia has been maintaining a healthy business environment, being ranked at the
12th position in terms of ease of doing business by the World Bank12. Malaysia should treat
the ongoing pandemic as a window of opportunity to preserve and even transform its business
ecosystem by establishing transparent and viable incentive systems for FDI inflow, improve labour
skill-sets and mindset and encourage robust adoption of technology, so that we are better prepared
and positioned to attract FDI of high value and high impact. Most importantly, as our international
borders remain close for now, all investment promotion agencies and professional practitioners
should collectively ensure the interests of FDI investors who already in Malaysia, is not forgotten
and neglected.
11 https://www.mida.gov.my/ 12 World Bank Doing Business Report 2020
4 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
“As at 16th July 2020, MIDA has identified a total of 433 potential foreign
investment worth RM97.4 billion to be brought into Malaysia”
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
DATO’ QUEK NGEE MENG LLM, LL. B (Hons) Adelaide, B. Ec, DSLP
MANAGING PARTNER HEAD, Department of Corporate & Finance HEAD, Department of Knowledge & Innovation
This article is intended to provide an update of the subject matter & is not intended to be nor should be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice.
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
IN BRIEF | KEY INCENTIVES FOR
MANUFACTURING & SERVICES SECTOR IN MALAYSIA
5 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
PIONEER STATUS (PS)
INCOME TAX EXEMPTION of 70% - 100%
of statutory income for 5 to 10 years.
Unabsorbed capital allowances &
accumulated losses incurred during the
pioneer period can be carried forward
and deducted from the post pioneer
status of the company.
INVESTMENT TAX
ALLOWANCE (ITA)
AN ALLOWANCE of 60% - 100% on
qualifying capital expenditure
(factory, plant, machinery, or other
equipment used for the approved
project) incurred within 5 to 10 years
from the date the first qualifying
capital expenditure is incurred.
APPLICATION PROCESS
&
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
In order to assess whether one’s
product/activity is eligible for these
incentives, the product/activity must
be cross-checked against a promoted
list of activities & products in
Appendix 1 of the publication entitled
“MALAYSIA: INVESTMENT IN THE
MANUFACTURING SECTOR -
POLICIES, INCENTIVES & FACILITIES
2019” available at:
https://www.mida.gov.my/
Companies may apply for the
incentives by filling up the relevant
forms (ICA1 – 7) which are available
on MIDA's website or on request at
MIDA's Business Information Centre
or the nearest MIDA office.
All applications will be issued with
acknowledgement letters stating the
name of the Officer or Deputy Director
or Director of the relevant Industry
Division. Applicants should therefore
contact the assigned person to check
their respective application status.
SUMMARISED BY:
KELVIN KOAY ZHI SHERN LL. B (Hons) London, CLP
ASSOCIATE, CORPORATE & FINANCE
This information is intended to provide a summary of the subject matter & is not intended to be nor should be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice.
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
FOREIGN EXCHANGE POLICY: RECENT REFINEMENTS
BY THE CENTRAL BANK OF MALAYSIA
By TEO SIANG LY
The Central Bank of Malaysia [Bank Negara Malaysia (“BNM”)] issued new Foreign
Exchange Notices (“FE Notices”) dated 30 April 2020 which took effect on the same date. All
previous notices on Foreign Exchange Administration Rules issued by the BNM on 28 June
2013 consisting of seven (7) notices, definitions together with all supplementary notices
(“Previous FEA Notices”) have been revoked.
The new FE Notices together with a comprehensive Interpretation came into effect on 30 April
2020 in replacement to the Previous FEA Notices. The refinement of the FE Notices aimed to
improve business efficacy and provide flexibility for corporate bodies to better manage their
foreign exchange risk exposure.
6 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
Keywords: FOREIGN EXCHANGE – banking & finance – foreign currency loan – foreign shareholders - financial guarantee
Key Resources: BANK NEGARA MALAYSIA - Financial Services Act 2013 - Islamic Financial Services Act 2013
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
THE NEW FE NOTICES
The FE Notices set out the following: -
Approval of the Bank for transactions which otherwise are prohibited under Section 214(2) read
together with Schedule 14 of the Financial Services Act 2013 (“FSA”) and Section 225(2) read
together with Schedule 14 of the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (“IFSA”).
Requirements, restrictions, and conditions of the approvals.
Directions of the Bank.
A person must obtain a written approval from BNM to undertake or engage in any transaction
listed in Schedule 14 of the FSA and IFSA that is not permitted by BNM under the FE Notices. In
exercise of powers conferred under FSA and IFSA, the new FE notices comprises an
Interpretation section and seven (7) notices as follows:-
Interpretation
Notice 1: Dealings in Currency, Gold & Other Precious Metals
Notice 2: Borrowing, Lending and Guarantee
Notice 3: Investment in Foreign Currency Asset
Notice 4: Payment and Receipt
Notice 5: Security and Financial Instrument
Notice 6: Import and Export of Currency
Notice 7: Export of Goods.
A new notice on ‘Direction on Dealings with Specified Person and in Restricted Currency’ issued
by BNM pursuant to Section 216(1) of the FSA and Section 227(1) of the IFSA was introduced
on 30 April 2020, which sets out the conditions and restrictions relating to payments and dealings
with Specified Person and the Restricted Currency.
The existing notice on ‘Declaration on Entities Created, Incorporated, etc., in Labuan’ issued by
BNM on 28 June 2013 and effective from 30 June 2013, shall remain in force.
7 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
SUMMARY OF KEY CHANGES IN THE NEW FE NOTES
PREAMBLE & INTERPRETATION
The Preamble and Interpretation provides more comprehensive definitions and interpretations for
terms set out in the FE Notices. Some of the key changes to definitions to take note are as follows:
DIRECT
SHAREHOLDER
10%
is now defined as a
shareholder with at least
10% effective
shareholding in a
Resident Entity
BORROWING
is now defined to include
any utilised or unutilised
credit facility or financing
facility, redeemable
preference shares, Islamic
redeemable preference
share, Corporate
Bond/sukuk with
exceptions.
FINANCIAL
GUARANTEE
is now defined as any
guarantee, indemnity or
undertaking to secure
repayment of a Borrowing
NON-FINANCIAL
GUARANTEE
is now defined as any
guarantee, indemnity or
undertaking (excluding
a Financial Guarantee)
issued or obtained not
for purposes of securing
Borrowing
FOREIGN
CURRENCY
ASSET
OFFSHORE
has replaced the term of
“Investment Abroad”
which were in the
previous FEA Notices
NON-RESIDENT FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION “NRFI”
is a new term which is
defined as a Non-Resident
Entity undertaking
financial services
including custodian bank
and trust bank
8 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
FE NOTICE 1: Dealings in Currency, Gold and Other Precious Metals
▪ A resident is now allowed to hedge foreign currency loan
obligations up to the underlying tenure. Previously, a resident can
hedge their foreign currency loan obligations up to 12 months
only. This flexibility enables residents to better manage their
foreign exchange risk arising from longer-term foreign currency
loan exposure.
▪ Residents and non-residents are free to cancel or unwind their
hedging except hedges on portfolio investment without the need to
seek BNM’s approval. This flexibility now allows all entities to
unwind their forward positions in managing their hedging costs
except for portfolio investment in response to the changing market
conditions.
‘Portfolio investment’ consists of (a) Tradable debt securities; and (b) Tradable equity
securities (less than 10% of ownership in an investee company), including a collective
investment scheme.
▪ There is no restriction for a resident and non-resident to cancel or unwind any forward
contract involving Ringgit where the underlying commitment still exist.
FE NOTICE 2: Borrowing, Lending and Guarantee
▪ A resident is now free to obtain financial guarantee from non-residents
and there is no approval or registration requirement with BNM.
Previously, residents can obtain financial guarantees up to an
aggregate of RM100 million only. This flexibility removes the limit
and enables foreign investors to better support their entities operating
in Malaysia.
▪ A resident is now free to give financial guarantee on behalf or in
favour of a non-resident with some exceptions. Previously, resident
can only issue financial guarantees up to an aggregate limit of RM50
million. This flexibility removes the limit with some exceptions and
enhances the ability of Malaysian corporate bodies to support their
global operations.
▪ The ‘exceptions’ are (i) for financial guarantee issued to secure foreign currency borrowing
obtained by non-resident SPV from a non-related non-resident entity, which is subject to
external borrowing limit in FE Notice 2; or (ii) for financial guarantee issued to secure
foreign currency borrowing obtained by a non-resident where the repayment of the
borrowing will be paid by a resident (other than when the financial guarantee is called upon
under an event of default). This will be subjected to investment abroad limit in Notice 3 on
Investment Foreign Currency Asset.
9 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
▪ If a resident is to issue a financial guarantee to secure borrowing obtained by a non-resident
SPV, but the proceeds are used by another non-resident related entity, an approval from BNM
is required. Approval from BNM is required even if the resident guarantor is not the
beneficiary of the borrowing based on the external borrowing limit in Notice 2.
▪ No approval from BNM is required for any changes made to existing registered or approved
financial guarantee except for guarantee issued under exceptions. A resident guarantor is only
required to submit an annual report on the status of the financial guarantees issued to or on
behalf of non-resident to BNM’s Jabatan Pengurusan Data dan Statistik (JPS) of which the
reporting requirements are to be issued by BNM.
FE NOTICE 3: Investment in Foreign Currency Asset
▪ There is no limit in the amount that a resident individual, sole
proprietorship, and general partnership with domestic Ringgit
borrowing may invest in a Foreign Currency Assets.
▪ An individual resident with domestic Ringgit borrowing is now allowed
to purchase real properties outside Malaysia for own accommodation or
accommodation of his/her immediate family members for the purposes
of education, employment or migration.
FE NOTICE 7: Export of Goods
▪ A resident exporter is exempted from the requirement to convert export
proceeds below RM200,000 per transaction into Ringgit. A resident
exporter can freely retain export proceeds up to RM200,000 equivalent
per transaction in their Trade FCA.
▪ A resident exporter can receive export proceeds up to 24 months from
the date of shipment if the amount of export proceeds does not exceed
RM200,000 equivalent per invoice instead of 6 months’ deadline under
the previous FEA Notices.
▪ Export proceeds above RM200,000 per transaction continue to be
subjected to the existing conversion requirement.
This flexibility will alleviate the administrative burden for exporters,
particularly SMEs, to meet their foreign currency obligations.
Notwithstanding the above, Trade FCA of the resident exporter will be regularly observed by
onshore banks to ensure no abuse to the flexibility.
10 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
In addition to the introduction of the new FE Notices, BNM has issued a further explanatory notes
as follows: -
‘Summary Note’ dated 30 April 2020; and
‘Frequently Asked Questions’ dated 30 April 2020 with an updated version dated
25 June 2020
Concluding Remarks
Our highlight to the key changes in the new FE Notices are in summary and not exhaustive.
The measures taken by BNM on the refinement in the foreign exchange policy through the
introduction of the new FE Notices allow Malaysian corporate bodies to have more flexibility into
funding or capital or guarantee from and to foreign investors. Further, a Malaysian corporate body
with foreign shareholders can now have the said shareholder entities to issue financial guarantees
in any amount to secure loans granted to Malaysian corporate bodies without having to procure
prior registrations and written approvals from the BNM.
The relaxation to the requirements on giving and obtaining financial guarantees will expedite the
timing required in the financing transaction processes. The new FE Notices provide a greater
certainty for Malaysian corporate bodies to enhance their ability to support global operations as
part of boosting global economy, and enable foreign investors to better support their entities
operating in Malaysia as part of promoting substantial dealings in Malaysia.
11 | INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INVESTMENT
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
TEO SIANG LY LL. B (Hons) MMU
SENIOR ASSOCIATE, Banking & Finance DEPUTY HEAD, Corporate & Finance
This article is intended to provide an update of the subject matter & is not intended to be nor should be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice.
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
SECURITIES COMMISSION’s LATEST
GUIDELINES ON CONDUCT OF DIRECTORS OF LISTED ISSUERS & THEIR SUBSIDIARIES
\
NOTABLE DEFINITIONS The Guidelines further expands the meaning of some key terms:
12 | COMMERCIAL & COMPLIANCE
BACKGROUND:
Issued by the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) pursuant to
Section 158 of the Securities Commission Malaysia Act 1993
PURPOSE:
In line with SC’s Corporate Governance Strategic Priorities 2017-
2020, these Guidelines are aimed at strengthening board
governance and supervision in listed issuers and their subsidiaries
APPLICATION
Directors of a listed corporation and directors of subsidiaries of a listed corporation
whether incorporated in Malaysia or otherwise
IN EFFECT
30 July 2020
[except Chapter 5 which will
take effect on 1 January
2021]
“DIRECTOR” as defined in s.2 of Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016)
AND further includes …
• Chief executive officer
• Chief financial officer
• Any other person primarily responsible for the operations or
financial management of a corporation, by whatever name
called
• In the case of a corporation formed / incorporated / existing
outside Malaysia– − a member of the corporation’s board of directors (BOD) or governing
body; OR
− a person occupying or acting in the position of a member of the
BOD, by whatever name called and whether or not validly appointed
to occupy, or duly authorised to act in the position
“SUBSIDIARY” as defined in s.4 of CA 2016
AND further includes … All entities whose financial statements
are consolidated into the financial
statements of the listed corporation
“GROUP” means …
A listed corporation and its subsidiaries
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
|continued |
GUIDELINES ON CONDUCT OF DIRECTORS OF LISTED ISSUERS & THEIR SUBSIDIARIES
3.04 |Notable Guidance| A director is required to inter alia
(a) MAINTAIN A SOUND UNDERSTANDING OF THE BUSINESS & KEEP
ABREAST OF RELEVANT DEVELOPMENTS TO ENSURE HE IS ABLE
TO DISCHARGE HIS DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES EFFECTIVELY
(b) PREPARE FOR BOARD MEETINGS, CONTRIBUTE CONSTRUCTIVELY
TO BOARD DISCUSSIONS & DECISION-MAKING, & CONDUCT DUE
INQUIRY BEFORE APPROVING A MATTER
(c) ENSURE KEY TRANSACTIONS OR CRITICAL DECISIONS ARE
DELIBERATED & DECIDED ON BY THE BOARD IN A MEETING
(d) ENSURE HIS DECISIONS & THE BASIS FOR THOSE DECISIONS,
INCLUDING ANY DISSENTING VIEWS ARE MADE KNOWN &
PROPERLY MINUTED
MANAGING CONFLICT OF INTEREST
3.05 A listed corporation & its director must establish POLICIES & PROCEDURES to manage potential
conflict of interest situations including potential conflict of interest between (a) any director & the
corporation; and (b) the listed corporation & its subsidiaries
3.06 A director of a corporation must NOT ACCEPT A BENEFIT FROM OR PROVIDE A BENEFIT TO A THIRD
PARTY unless he is permitted to do so by the corporation’s constitution or its code of conduct, and it is not
contrary to any written law
[CHAPTER 3] CONDUCT REQUIREMENTS FOR DIRECTORS
3.01 A director must exercise his powers for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the
corporation in which he sits as a board member [Section 213(1) CA 2016]
3.02 A Nominee Director must not subordinate his duty to act in the best interest of the corporation to his
nominator [Section 217 (1) CA 2016]
3.03 A director must exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence which may reasonably be expected of a
director & any additional knowledge, skill and experience which the director has [Section 213(2) CA 2016]
13 | COMMERCIAL & COMPLIANCE
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
|continued |
GUIDELINES ON CONDUCT OF DIRECTORS OF LISTED ISSUERS & THEIR SUBSIDIARIES
SUMMARISED BY:
KASHMIR HARBANS SINGH LL. B (Hons) London, CLP, PG Dip (London) SENIOR ASSOCIATE, Commercial & Compliance TEAM LEAD, Business Development
SOURCE: Info on page 12 -14 of this Publication was mainly extracted from https://www.sc.com.my/
This information is intended to provide a summarised update of the subject matter & is not intended to be nor should be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice
14 | COMMERCIAL & COMPLIANCE
[CHAPTER 4] MAINTAIN PROPER RECORDS & ACCOUNTS
4.01 A LISTED CORPORATION & ITS DIRECTORS must cause to be kept the
accounting & other records to:
sufficiently explain the business, transactions & financial position
of the listed corporation and its subsidiaries.
enable the preparation of true and fair financial statements; &
enable the accounting and other records of the listed corporation
and its subsidiaries to be conveniently and properly audited
4.02 A SUBSIDIARY OF A LISTED CORPORATION & ITS DIRECTORS must
cause to be kept the accounting and other records to–
sufficiently explain its business, transactions and financial position;
enable the preparation of true and fair financial statements; &
enable the accounting and other records to be conveniently &
properly audited
4.03 Subsidiary and its directors must provide the listed corporation with all information and record
necessary to enable the preparation of the CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (where required) in
accordance with the approved accounting standards
4.04 Corporations must
ensure that it retains all
RECORDS FOR NOT < 7 YEARS
from the completion of the
transactions or operations
4.05 If any accounting &
other RECORDS ARE KEPT
OUTSIDE MALAYSIA, THE SC
MAY DIRECT THE DIRECTORS
to produce any of those
records at a place in Malaysia
& how those records are to be
kept in Malaysia. Directors
must comply with the direction
[CHAPTER 5] GROUP GOVERNANCE
5.01 A LISTED CORPORATION & ITS DIRECTORS must establish an adequate group
wide framework for co-operation & communication between the corporation & its
subsidiaries and enable oversight of …|GROUP FINANCIAL & NON-FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE | BUSINESS STRATEGY & PRIORITIES| RISK MANAGEMENT
|CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES & PRACTICES
5.02 GROUP WIDE FRAMEWORK ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE includes …
| CODE OF CONDUCT & ETHICS |POLICIES & PROCEDURES ON ANTI-CORRUPTION
| WHISTLEBLOWING | MANAGING CONFLICT OF INTEREST | MANAGING MATERIAL
SUSTAINABILITY RISKS| POLICY ON BOARD DIVERSITY
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
#HHQ FACTS
Rescheduling & Restructuring of Loans in times of Covid-19
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected businesses
and individuals’ ability to service their respective
loans. In view of this, the Malaysian government
has come out with various special measures such
as a six-month moratorium on selected types of
loans to help affected businesses and borrowers to
weather the adverse effects of Covid-19.
While the granting of the automatic 6-month
moratorium is a rescheduling exercise, loans may
be rescheduled or restructured in many other ways
to suit the financial circumstances of borrowers.
RESCHEDULING a loan refers to the modification of loan repayment terms where the principal terms
and conditions of the contract are not changed significantly, namely lengthening the loan tenure and
revision of monthly instalments. RESTRUCTURING, on the other hand, is the modification of the
principal terms and conditions of the facility which includes change in the type or structure of the loan
or other significant change to its terms.
Depending on the extent of the rescheduling and restructuring of a loan, a borrower will be required to
execute an instrument to reflect the rescheduling or restructuring exercise. If the borrower is applying
for additional loan sum, s/he would be required to execute a facility agreement or any other security
document for the additional loan sum and such instrument will be subjected to ad-valorem stamp duty.
In order to help businesses affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, the Malaysian government also
announced its Economic Stimulus Package 2020 on 27 February 2020 wherein one of the measures
introduced is to provide exemption on stamp duty for the rescheduling or restructuring of business loans.
This was followed by a gazette PU(A) 165 on 21 May 2020 stipulating a 100% exemption of stamp duty
to be granted on the loan/facility agreement entered into between borrowers and financial institutions for
the purposes of restructuring or rescheduling of business loans. This exemption is applicable only if the
stamp duty on the original loan agreement has been paid and only for loan restructuring and rescheduling
agreements executed from 1 March 2020 to 31 December 2020.
Where the rescheduling or restructuring of a loan involves variation to the terms of the existing loan
that is secured by third party security such as a guarantee, consent from the third party to such variation
needs to be obtained, otherwise there may be issue of whether the liability of such third party is
discharged pursuant to Section 86 of the Contracts Act 1950.
15 | HHQ UPDATES | COVID-19 & RMCO
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
TAN POH YEE LL. B(Hons) University of East London, CLP
SENIOR ASSOCIATE TEAM LEAD, LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT
This write up is intended to provide an update of the subject matter & is not intended to be nor should be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice
FOR MORE #HHQ FACTS Follow us, /Halim Hong & Quek/ @ hhq.com.my/ or on …
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
POWER OF HOUSING CONTROLLER
TO GRANT EXTENSION OF TIME : No Blanket Application of Ang Ming Lee?
By LEON GAN & HEE SUE ANN
BACKGROUND
On 26 Nov 2019, Federal Court in the case BHL Construction Sdn Bhd v Ang Ming Lee delivered
a key decision on the fundamental jurisdictional issue of whether Controller of Housing is
empowered to grant extension of time (“EOT”) to housing developers.
For a complete discussion of the Federal Court’s decision, see our December 2019 newsletter
@ https://hhq.com.my/publications/
CASE HIGHLIGHT :
LEE SHY TSONG & ORS V AMPROJEK CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD & ANOR | 15 June 2020 | HIGH COURT
BRIEF FACTS:
16 | CASE HIGHLIGHT | REAL ESTATE
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
ISSUE :
Whether the letter by Housing Controller dated 30.08.2012, in granting EOT to the Developer to
deliver vacant possession within 48 months instead of 36 months, was made in error of law.
HIGH COURT’s DECISION:
The High Court dismissed the Purchasers’ challenge and held that the EOT granted to the
Developer was not contrary to the HDA 1966 and was instead premised on various justifications
for the further time provided by the Developer.
The Housing Controller is empowered to amend Schedule H…
The High Court was of the view that the wordings in Regulation 11(3) of the HDR 1989 made
it clear that the Housing Controller (Controller) is empowered to waive or modify clauses in
the statutory SPA, which may include the power of extending delivery period of vacant
possession, provided that the Controller is satisfied that there are special circumstances, hardship
or necessity which makes compliance with the said provision is impracticable or unnecessary.
Decision in Ang Ming Lee to be distinguished …
The High Court held that the facts of Ang Ming Lee’s
case should be distinguished from the present case, in
light of the following reasons:
There is no appeal in the current case. The Purchasers did not appeal to the Minister on the
Controller’s decision on EOT approval within the timeframe of 14 days. It is only the Minister and
no other parties who is being granted such power to decide and sign such letter of approval. An
appeal against the Controller’s decision under Regulation 12 of HDR 1989 should have been firstly
done and followed by filing a judicial review.
The Developer had delivered the VP within 36 months. Despite the EOT approval, the
Developer did not change nor modify the VP period in the SPA to 48 months and had acted in
compliance with the SPA clause to deliver the VP within 36 months. This fact is agreed and
confirmed by the Purchasers. The court is therefore of view that the Purchasers are merely
dissatisfied with the construction of the building specification and defects, wherein the Purchasers’
remedy may be found in a civil suit filed earlier and and had failed to show the action of judicial
review is with merit to be granted. Therefore, the Purchasers’ application was dismissed.
17 | CASE HIGHLIGHT | REAL ESTATE
This case update is based on documents procured from the Court's internet portal. We do not warrant & verify the accuracy and correctness of those documents. This update is intended to be informative and not intended to be nor should be relied upon as a substitute for legal or any other professional advice.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
LEON GAN HAN CHEN LL. B (Hons) MMU
PARTNER, REAL ESTATE
HEE SUE ANN LL. B (Hons) MMU
PUPIL-IN-CHAMBERS, REAL ESTATE
| Volume 3 | Issue No. 7 | JULY 2020 | © Halim Hong & Quek
And it is a wrap of an eventful July for us…
18 | HHQ CONNECT | WEBINAR SERIES
2 JULY 2020: Through a (web) #BookClub session, our
Managing Partner, Dato’ Quek Ngee Meng shared some novel
insights from a book written by the world-famous economist,
Yanis Varoufakis. #HHQBookClub sessions are a regular &
special part of our very own #CPDProgramme, which provide
all our staff a learning platform where they can share and discuss
many such insightful ideas and information with each other
Many thanks
to all our attendees!
27 July 2020: Partner of our Dispute Resolution Department,
Mr. Ankit R Sanghvi provided an interesting review of the essential
clauses & terms in the #PAM2006 standard forms of #contracts
For more info our UPCOMING webinars, follow us:
https://hhq.com.my/hhq-webinars/
#HHQ
CONNECT