Malibu High School

2013-14 School Accountability Report Card — Published during the 2014-15 school yearIn accordance with state and federal requirements, the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) is put forth annually by all public schools as a tool for parents and interested parties to stay informed of the school’s progress, test scores and achievements.

Malibu High School

Principal’s MessageMalibu High School is a comprehensive middle and high school, grades 6-12, that provides its students with a world-class, 21st-century education. We pride ourselves in our friendly, caring environment that prepares all of its students to be thoughtful, insightful, lifelong learners, who are responsible citizens of a global community. Situated on the Pacific Coast just outside Los Angeles, our students have ac-cess to hands-on, authentic learning opportunities for diverse courses of study, including marine and environmental sciences to visual and performing arts. Being both middle and high school, our faculty is highly adept at differentiating instruction and providing for the needs of all of our students. Additionally, we are able to provide an articulated academic program, which allows for a seamless transition from middle to high school. Our joint program also affords eighth-grade students an opportunity to try high-school-level electives.

In addition to having a highly dedicated and professional staff and faculty, MHS is also fortunate to have an engaged and supportive parent community. Thanks in large part to our various parent organizations and their contributions, Malibu High School thrives and continues to provide the quality programs and resources that our children deserve to be well-rounded individuals.

Parental InvolvementMalibu High School has several volunteer parent and information networks: PTSA ensures open com-munication between the school and parents, the Arts Angels support our arts programs, and the Athletic Booster Club supports our athletic programs. The highly successful fundraising organization, The Shark Fund (www.thesharkfund.org), secures the necessary financial resources needed to support all of our programs, including booster and academic programs.

For more information on how to become involved at the school, please contact Karen Ferrar, PTSA President, at (310) 457-6801.

CDS Code: 19-64980-1995737

30215 Morning View Dr. Malibu, CA 90265-3616 • Phone: (310) 457-6801 • Grades: 6-12 Dave Jackson, Principal • E-mail: [email protected] • www.malibuhigh.org

“We exist to prepare all students in their

pursuit of academic achievement and

personal health and to support and encourage them in

their development of intellectual, artistic,

technological, physical and social expression.”

District VisionAs a community of learners, the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District works together in a nurtur-ing environment to help students be visionary, versatile thinkers; resourceful, lifelong learners; effective, multilingual communicators; and global citizens. We are a richly varied community that values the con-tributions of all its members. We exist to prepare all students in their pursuit of academic achievement and personal health and to support and encourage them in their development of intellectual, artistic, technological, physical and social expression.

Malibu High School Mission StatementMalibu High School strives to be a collaborative community that respects individuals, sets high expecta-tions, encourages critical thinking, and fosters a passion for learning and creative expression.

Malibu High School students will be academic achievers who:

• Meet or exceed California State Standards.

• Demonstrate critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

• Communicate effectively.

• Implement technology responsibly and effectively.

• Read avidly for multiple purposes.

Malibu High School students will be healthy individuals who:

• Develop physical and emotional well-being.

• Plan for college and career by setting priorities and achievable goals.

• Explore a variety of activities including athletics, fine arts and school-sponsored clubs.

• Practice behaviors that are necessary for success in life.

• Demonstrate honesty and integrity.

Malibu High School students will be socially responsible citizens who:

• Show respect for self and appreciation of our diverse society.

• Learn through service to the community.

• Demonstrate environmental responsibility.

• Participate actively in the democratic process.

• Recognize their role in the local and global community.

Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictSandra Lyon, Superintendent E-mail: [email protected]

www.smmusd.org 1651 16th Street

Santa Monica, CA 90404 Phone: (310) 450-8338

Para español visita: www.smmusd.org

Governing BoardLaurie Lieberman

President

Dr. Jose Escarce Vice Presidnet

Osca de la Torre Member

Craig Foster Member

Maria Leon-Vazquez Member

Richard Tahvildaran-Jesswein Member

Ralph Mechur Member

2013-14 School Accountability Report Card2

Suspension and Expulsion Rates

Malibu HS

11-12 12-13 13-14

Suspension rates 3.0% 3.2% 2.6%

Expulsion rates 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Santa Monica-Malibu USD

11-12 12-13 13-14



California

11-12 12-13 13-14



Suspensions and ExpulsionsThis table shows the school, district, and state suspension and expulsion rates for the most recent three-year period. Note: Students are only counted one time, re-gardless of the number of suspensions.

Three-Year Data ComparisonNumber of Classrooms by Size

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

GradeNumber of Students

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

6 17 3 16 12 6 20

SubjectNumber of Students

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

English language arts 14 17 9 14 15 16 19 12 19

Mathematics 9 19 8 10 9 17 14 12 17

Science 4 10 14 4 7 16 5 6 19

History/social science 2 10 17 1 11 19 6 4 26

2013-14 Enrollment by Grade

Enrollment by Grade LevelThe bar graph displays the total number of students enrolled in each grade for the 2013-14 school year.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

174

154

146

177

185

152

182

School SafetyMalibu High School is committed to ensuring a safe school defined by a respectful learning environ-ment, balanced with appropriate standards of behavior. We offer students and parents the opportunities to engage in many activities including athletic and school-sponsored events, during and outside the school day. As a primary gathering place for young people in Malibu, administrators and campus se-curity supervise activities ensuring that students, guests and community feel welcomed. Working with our parents and community partners, we work to ensure that all who come to our school are safe. We review and update the Malibu High School Safety Plan annually. Throughout the year, we have safety and evacuation drills for fires, earthquakes and other emergencies including campus lockdowns. Our PTSA generously provides a comprehensive reserve of supplies in the event of a significant emergency that would require us to hold our students (and members of the community) for more than a 24-hour period. We also have a relationship with the City of Malibu and the local American Red Cross agency to assist us in the event of a significant community emergency. Malibu High School is committed to a safe environment that supports teaching and learning. Visitors to the campus enter through our Attendance Office entry and must check in with the Main Office. School security staff, administrative staff, support staff and parent volunteers (Parent Eyes) work together to ensure a safe and secure campus.

The School Safety Plan was last reviewed, updated, and discussed with the school faculty in Septem-ber 2014.

Three-Year Data ComparisonAverage Class Size

11-12 12-13

Class Size DistributionThe bar graph displays the three-year data for average class size, and the table displays the three-year data for the number of classrooms by size.

6 English-Language Arts

Mathematics Science History-SocialScience

2225

2931

22 2326

3032

24 24 25

31 32

13-14

3Malibu High School

2013-14 School Accountability Report Card

California Physical Fitness TestEach spring, all students in grades 5, 7, and 9 are required to participate in the California Physical Fit-ness Test (PFT). The Fitnessgram® is the designated PFT for students in California public schools put forth by the State Board of Education. The PFT measures six key fitness areas:

1. Aerobic Capacity

2. Body Composition

3. Flexibility

4. Abdominal Strength and Endurance

5. Upper Body Strength and Endurance

6. Trunk Extensor Strength and Flexibility

Encouraging and assisting students in establishing lifelong habits of regular physical activity is the primary goal of the Fitnessgram®. The table shows the percentage of students meeting the fitness standards of being in the “healthy fitness zone” for the most recent testing period. For more detailed information on the California PFT, please visit www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf.

2013-14 School YearCalifornia Physical Fitness Test

Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Malibu HS

Grade 7 Grade 9

Four of Six Standards 12.80% 13.20%

Five of Six Standards 29.50% 30.80%

Six of Six Standards 47.70% 47.20%

2013-14 School YearDemographics

Enrollment by Student GroupThe total enrollment at the school was 1,170 students for the 2013-14 school year. The pie chart displays the percentage of students enrolled in each group.

Socioeconomically disadvantaged 11.80%English learners 3.00%

Students with disabilities 8.50%

Hispanic or Latino11.8%

American Indian or Alaska Native

0.2%

Asian2.6%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

0.4%Filipino0.4%

Black or African-American

1.5%

White79.8%

Two or More Races2.9% No Response

0.4%

Professional DevelopmentAll teachers and staff in SMMUSD par-ticipate in ongoing professional develop-ment through banked time, a total of 90 minutes of meeting and professional development time each week at each site. Areas of districtwide focus for teacher and administrator professional development include implementation of new Common Core standards and other areas that are determined by a review of summative and formative data from all school sites and the collection of input from teachers and administrators. Among the primary focus areas for professional development in SM-MUSD are the following:

• Developing Instructional Leadership Teams and Professional Learning Communities through Lesson Link, Academic Conferences and Learning Walks

• Literacy and mathematics—Common Core standards-based curriculum and instructional delivery

• Using data to improve classroom instruction

• Culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy

• Supporting students with special needs

• Differentiated instruction for all students, including English learners

• Technology integration

A variety of methodologies is used to provide professional development, including coaching and mentoring. SM-MUSD provides coaching through several programs such as BTSA, National Boards, literacy and ELD coaching, and Instruc-tional Leadership Teams. Additionally, professional development occurs through workshop series during banked time and/or after-school opportunities. Each August, all teachers new to Santa Monica-Malibu are invited to participate in Teacher Acad-emy, a professional development and orientation to districtwide curriculum and instructional initiatives. All eligible new teachers are encouraged to participate in BTSA. Teachers interested in applying for National Board Certification may partici-pate in the process and can elect to be supported by teachers who have already achieved National Board Certification.

Malibu High School’s professional devel-opment activities are both schoolwide and departmentally based. Focus areas include:

• To increase student achievement in mathematics by engaging department members in a self-study process of assessment norming and academic conferencing.

Continued on page 6

Public Internet AccessInternet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-serve basis. Other use restrictions include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available at a workstation, and the ability to print documents.


v Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less, either because the number of students tested in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Three-Year Data ComparisonStudents Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Levels

Malibu HS Santa Monica-Malibu USD California

Subject 10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13

English language arts 76% 78% 80% 72% 74% 74% 54% 56% 55%

Mathematics 53% 60% 60% 60% 62% 62% 49% 50% 50%

History/social science 76% 73% 75% 62% 61% 63% 48% 49% 49%

Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students The table below shows the percentage of students who scored at Proficient or Advanced levels (meet-ing or exceeding state standards) in English language arts, mathematics and history/social science. Because of the new CAASPP field-testing in the spring of 2014, there are no scores to be reported. The last available scores under the STAR Program are shown.

Spring 2014 ResultsStudents Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Levels

Group Science

All students in the district 78%

All students at the school 75%

Male 76%

Female 74%

Black or African-American v

American Indian or Alaska Native v

Asian v

Filipino v

Hispanic or Latino 59%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander v

White 77%

Two or more races v

Socioeconomically disadvantaged 49%

English learners v

Students with disabilities 43%

Students receiving Migrant Education services v

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group: Science (grades 5, 8 and 10)

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress/Standardized Testing and Reporting Results Beginning in the 2013-14 school year, the Standardized Testing and Report-ing (STAR) Program was eliminated and replaced by a new set of assess-ments called the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP).

Because of the state’s adoption of the Common Core State Standards and implementation of a new student-testing system, limited data is available to report in the SARC.

For the 2013-14 school year, the CAASPP included the Smarter Balanced Assess-ments, alternate, science, and other optional assessments.

In the spring of 2014, California began field-testing the Smarter Balanced Assessments in English language arts and mathematics. These tests were not officially scored, so there is no data to report.

The science assessments of CAASPP included the California Standards Test (CST), California Modified Assessment (CMA) and California Alternate Perfor-mance Assessment (CAPA), similar to the STAR Program. Therefore it is acceptable to make comparisons to previous year results.

The CST is a multiple-choice test in sci-ence for varying grade levels. The CMA is a modified assessment for students with disabilities who have an Individual-ized Education Plan (IEP). The CAPA is an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the CST with accommoda-tions or modifications, or the CMA with accommodations.

For more information on the CAASPP assessments, please visit www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/ca.


Malibu HS Santa Monica-Malibu USD California

Subject 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14

Science 75% 81% 75% 76% 78% 78% 60% 59% 60%

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results: Science (grades 5, 8 and 10)The tables show the percentage of students in grades 5, 8 and 10 who scored at Proficient or Advanced levels (meeting or exceeding state standards) in science.

5

Academic Performance IndexThe Academic Performance Index (API) is a numeric rating system that reflects a school and district’s performance level based on the results of annual statewide student assess-ments. It is used to measure the academic performance and progress of the schools within California. Individual outcomes are converted to points on the API scale and then averaged across all students and all tests, resulting in a single number, or API score, measured on a scale from 200 to 1,000. This score reflects the school, district or a student group’s per-formance level based on the results of statewide testing. The state has set an API score of 800 as the statewide target.

With a complete change of the K-12 education system, the State Board of Education tem-porarily suspended API. No API scores or ranks will be calculated for the next two years, as California continues the transition to the new Common Core State Standards and California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress.

To learn more about API, please visit www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap for the API information guide and www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ar/aprfaq.asp for information on the changes to API.

5Malibu High School


API Ranks

Three-Year Data Comparison

2011 2012 2013

Statewide API Rank 9 10 10

Similar Schools API Rank 4 5 7

nData are reported only for numerically significant groups.


2013 Growth API and Three-Year Data ComparisonAPI Growth by Student Group

Group2013 Growth API Malibu HS –

Actual API Change

Malibu HS Santa Monica-Malibu USD California 10-11 11-12 12-13

All students 883 865 790 27 9 12

Black or African-American 773 746 707 n n n

American Indian or Alaska Native v 871 742 n n n

Asian 924 942 906 n n n

Filipino v 920 867 n n n

Hispanic or Latino 813 791 743 n -7 41

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander v 943 773 n n n

White 892 907 852 38 11 6

Two or more races 903 914 845 n n n

Socioeconomically disadvantaged 834 779 742 29 24 41

English learners 798 795 717 n n n

Students with disabilities 704 667 616 n n n

API Growth by Student GroupAssessment data is reported only for numerically significant groups. To be considered numerically significant for the API, the group must have either: at least 50 students with valid STAR scores who make up at least 15 percent of the total valid STAR scores, or at least 100 students with valid STAR scores. This table displays, by student group, first, the 2013 Growth API at the school, district and state level followed by the actual API change in points added or lost for the past three years at the school.

API RanksSchools are ranked in 10 categories of equal size, called deciles, from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) based on their API Base reports. A school’s “statewide API rank” com-pares its API to the APIs of all other schools statewide of the same type (elementary, middle or high school). A “similar schools API rank” reflects how a school com-pares to 100 statistically matched similar schools. This table shows the school’s three-year data for statewide API rank and similar schools’ API rank.


2013-14 School YearAdequate Yearly Progress Criteria

Malibu HS Santa Monica-Malibu USD

Met overall AYP

Met participation rate

English language arts

Mathematics

Met percent proficient

English language arts

Mathematics

Met graduation rate

Adequate Yearly ProgressThe federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires all schools and districts meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements. Because California is changing the assessments and the accountability system it uses to evaluate school performance, the U.S. Department of Education has approved a waiver to allow California not to make Adequate Yearly Progress determinations for elemen-tary and middle schools. They will receive the same AYP determinations as in 2013.

High schools will not be affected by this waiver and will continue to receive AYP determinations because they are based on California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) results and graduation rates.

For more information on Adequate Yearly Progress, please visit www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay.

2014-15 School YearFederal Intervention Program

Malibu HS Santa Monica-Malibu USD

Program Improvement status Not Title I In PI

First year of Program Improvement ² 2011-2012

Year in Program Improvement* ² Year 3

Number of schools identified for Program Improvement 4

Percent of schools identified for Program Improvement 100.00%

Federal Intervention ProgramSchools and districts receiving Title I funding that fail to meet AYP over two consecutive years in the same content area (English language arts or mathematics) or on the same indicator (API or gradua-tion rate) enter into Program Improvement (PI). Each additional year that the district or school(s) do not meet AYP results in advancement to the next level of intervention. The percent of schools identified for Program Improvement is calculated by taking the number of schools currently in PI within the district and dividing it by the total number of Title I schools within the district.

Due to the waiver that allows California to use the same AYP determinations as 2013, no new schools will enter or exit Program Improvement, and current PI schools will not advance a year in their PI status. This table displays the 2014-15 PI status for the school and district. For detailed information about PI identification, please visit www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/tidetermine.asp.

² Not applicable.

For 2014, only high schools and high school local educational agencies (LEAs) that enrolled students in grades nine, ten, eleven, and/or twelve on Fall Census Day in October 2013 will receive an AYP Report. Because students in grades three through eight participated in the Smarter Balanced Field Test during the 2013–14 academic year, the U.S. Department of Education approved a determination waiver for California which exempts elementary schools, middle schools, elementary school districts, and unified school districts from receiving a 2014 AYP Report.

Professional DevelopmentContinued from page 3

• To strengthen support and services to middle school students and families by examining and utilizing the findings from our middle school survey.

• To strengthen discipline-specific literacy by engaging high school teachers in multidisciplinary learning teams in a study of reading and vocabulary development strategies.

• To strengthen teaching of higher-order thinking and critical thinking by engaging high school teachers in a study of thinking strategies.

For the 2012-13 school year, we dedicated one day to professional development. In the 2013-14 and 2014-15 school years, there were two days dedicated to profes-sional development.

Types of Services FundedMalibu High School utilizes categorical and local funding to support teaching and learning. Programs include After School Library Drop-in Tutoring, Council Program—in partnership with the Malibu Boys & Girls Club—teacher professional development, teacher release time and Bilingual Community Liaison. Malibu High School routinely serves as an intern site for graduate students pursuing pupil ser-vices and school psychologist credentials. Categorical funding also is used to pur-chase curriculum, supplies and materials used to support teaching and learning.

777

California High School Exit Exam ResultsThe California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) is primarily used as a gradu-ation requirement in California. Students are first tested in grade 10 and have multiple chances to retake the test if the student does not pass the first time. The grade 10 results of this exam are also used to determine AYP for high schools as required by the federal NCLB law. The CAHSEE has two sections: English language arts and mathematics. For the purposes of calculating AYP, three perfor-mance levels are set: Advanced, Proficient and Not Proficient.

7Malibu High School



English Language Arts Mathematics

11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14

Malibu HS 80% 82% 84% 85% 77% 76%

Santa Monica-Malibu USD 74% 76% 45% 74% 73% 44%

California 56% 57% 56% 58% 60% 62%

California High School Exit Exam Grade 10 ResultsThe table displays the percentage of students scoring at Proficient or Advanced levels for the most recent three-year period. Note that the score a student must achieve to be considered Proficient is dif-ferent than the passing score for graduation requirement.


2013-14 School YearStudents Achieving at Each Performance Level

English Language Arts Mathematics

Group Not Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient Proficient Advanced

All students in the district 28% 26% 46% 30% 37% 34%

All students at the school 16% 26% 57% 24% 42% 34%

Male 26% 28% 46% 16% 47% 37%

Female 8% 25% 67% 30% 38% 32%

Black or African-American v v v v v v

American Indian or Alaska Native v v v v v v

Asian v v v v v v

Filipino v v v v v v

Hispanic or Latino 20% 35% 45% 40% 40% 20%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander v v v v v v

White 16% 25% 59% 22% 40% 38%

Two or more races v v v v v v

Socioeconomically disadvantaged 40% 20% 40% 45% 40% 15%

English learners v v v v v v

Students with disabilities v v v v v v

Students receiving Migrant Education services v v v v v v

CAHSEE Grade 10 Results by Student Group: English Language Arts and MathematicsThis table displays the percentage of students, by group, achieving at each performance level in English language arts and mathematics for the most recent testing period. For detailed information regarding the CAHSEE results, visit www.cahsee.cde.ca.gov.

2013-14 School Accountability Report Card8Admission Requirements for California’s Public UniversitiesUniversity of California: Admission requirements for the University of California (UC) follow guidelines set forth in the Master Plan, which requires that the top one-eighth of the state’s high school graduates, as well as those transfer students who have successfully completed specified college course work, be eligible for admission to the UC. These requirements are designed to ensure that all eligible students are adequately prepared for university-level work. For general admissions requirements, please visit the UC Admissions Information Web page at http://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu.

California State University: Eligibility for admission to the California State University (CSU) is deter-mined by three factors: 1. specific high school courses, 2. grades in specified courses and test scores, and 3. graduation from high school. Some campuses have higher standards for particular majors or students who live outside the local campus area. Because of the number of students who apply, a few campuses have higher standards (supplementary admission criteria) for all applicants. Most CSU cam-puses have local admission-guarantee policies for students who graduate or transfer from high schools and colleges that are historically served by a CSU campus in that region. For admission, application and fee information, see the CSU Web page at www.calstate.edu/admission/admission.shtml.

Career Technical Education ProgramsAs we shift away from the former ROP structure, the opportunity for new and revised CTE program path-ways are being developed through a strong collaborative partnership between SMMUSD and Santa Monica College. The purpose and focus of our CTE collaborative pathways is to educate and help to prepare our students for STEM careers involving sophisticated scientific, engineering and technological skills and knowledge, as well as a focus on fostering, nurturing and valuing imagination, creativity and innovation. Furthermore, our joint collaborative pathways enable dual enrollment academic opportuni-ties for our secondary students with congruent transferability and bachelor degree goals.

The district currently does not have district-funded CTE programs in place. The SMMUSD CTE pro-grams are offered collaboratively through the Los Angeles County Regional Occupational Program (LACOROP) which maintains advisory committees in each program area.

ROP funded courses offered by the district include the following:

• (State course titles)

• Automotive Technology

• Business Entrepreneurship (UC)

• Commercial Photography (UC)

• Computer Science and Information Systems

• Film and Video Production (UC)

• Floral Design and Sales

• Graphic Communications (UC)

• Information & Media Support Services

• Marketing Essentials

• Marketing – Career & Job Readiness (IEP & 504)

• Office Occupations

• Professional Actor

• Professional Dance (UC)

• Recreation Occupations (UC)

• Stagecraft Technology

• Technical Theater

2012-13 and 2013-14 School YearsUC/CSU Admission

Malibu HS

Percentage of students enrolled in courses required for UC or CSU admission in 2013-14 51.33%

Percentage of graduates who completed all courses required for UC or CSU admission in 2012-13 69.77%

Course Enrollment for UC and CSU AdmissionThe table displays two measures related to the school’s courses that are required for University of Cali-fornia and California State University admission for the most recent year for which data is available. For more detailed information, visit http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest.

Career Technical Education Data

Malibu HS

2013-14 Participation

Number of pupils participating in CTE 144

Percentage of pupils who completed a CTE program and earned a high school diploma

100%

Percentage of CTE courses that are sequenced or articulated between a school and institutions of postsecondary education

100%

Career Technical Education ParticipationThis table displays information about par-ticipation in the school’s Career Technical Education (CTE) programs.

99Malibu High School


“We pride ourselves in our friendly, caring environment that prepares all of its students to be thoughtful, insightful, lifelong learners, who are responsible citizens of a global community.”

Graduating Class of 2013Completion of High School Graduation Requirements

Group Malibu HS Santa Monica-Malibu USD California

All students 98.29% 91.65% 84.56%

Black or African-American 100% 87.76% 75.90%

American Indian or Alaska Native v 100% 77.82%

Asian 100% 95.45% 92.94%

Filipino v 87.50% 92.20%

Hispanic or Latino 105% 89.77% 80.83%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 100% 100% 84.06%

White 97.22% 92.42% 90.15%

Two or more races 100% 104.17% 89.03%

Socioeconomically disadvantaged 100% 92.92% 82.58%

English learners 125% 74.55% 53.68%

Students with disabilities 94.12% 75.57% 60.31%

Completion of High School Graduation RequirementsThis table displays school, district and California data for the percentage of students in the most recent graduating class who met all state and local graduation requirements for grade 12 completion, including having passed both the English language arts and mathematics portions of the CAHSEE or received a local waiver or state exemption. For more information, please visit www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/hs.

Three-Year Data ComparisonGraduation and Dropout Rates

Graduation Rate Dropout Rate

10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13

Malibu HS 93.48% 96.02% 97.16% 5.40% 2.30% 1.70%

Santa Monica-Malibu USD 88.06% 91.44% 93.47% 8.20% 5.20% 3.50%

California 77.14% 78.87% 80.44% 14.70% 13.10% 11.40%

Graduates and DropoutsThis table displays the graduation and dropout rates for the most recent three-year period for which data is available. See www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf for more information.

Advanced Placement Courses

2013-14 School Year

Percent of total enrollment enrolled in AP courses 0.50%

Number of AP courses offered at the school 19

Number of AP Courses by Subject

Computer Science ²

English 5

Fine and performing arts ²

Foreign language 3

Mathematics 2

Science 3

Social science 6

Advanced Placement CoursesThe following is a list of Advanced Placement (AP) courses offered by subject at the school.

“We are a richly varied community

that values the contributions of all its

members.” v Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less, either because the number of students tested in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

² Not applicable.


2014-15 School YearTextbooks and Instructional Materials List

Subject Textbook Adopted

English language arts California Literature, McDougal-Littell (6-8) 2009

English language arts Literature and Language Arts, Holt 2003

Mathematics Calculus: Graphical, Numeric, Algebraic 2006

Mathematics SpringBoard: Middle School Math III, College Board 2011

Mathematics California Mathematics, Holt 2008

Mathematics Statistics Through Applications 2006

Mathematics Before Calculus 3, HarperCollins 2001

Science Physics: Principles with Applications, Prentice Hall 2000

Science Focus on Science, Prentice Hall (6-8) 2007

Science Earth Science, Glencoe 2000

Science Health, Holt 2007

Science Physics for Scientists and Engineers 2000

Science Biology, Prentice Hall 2002

Science Chemistry, Holt 2007

History/social science History Alive!, TCI (6-8) 2006

History/social science Conflict and Consensus in American History 2001

History/social science Understanding Psychology, McGraw-Hill 2004

History/social science Government in America: People, Politics, and Policy 2001

History/social science Psychology Principles in Practice, Feldman 2004

History/social science Economics: Principles & Practices 2001

History/social science Modern World History 2004

Percentage of Students Lacking Materials by Subject

2014-15 School Year

Reading/language arts 0%

Mathematics 0%

Science 0%

History/social science 0%

Visual and performing arts 0%

Foreign language 0%

Health 0%

Science laboratory equipment 0%

Textbooks and Instructional MaterialsAll students at Malibu High have access to state-approved and district-adopted textbooks and instruc-tional materials in all core academic areas. The district follows the state’s K-8 guidelines and cycles for textbook adoptions with new mathematics materials purchased and implemented in the 2014-20015 school year and new English language arts for grades 6-8 adopted and implemented in the 2009-10 school year. In addition, a new math curriculum for the middle school students is aligned to the new Common Core standards. All students, including English learners, have their own copy of textbooks. K-8 textbooks and instructional materials are recommended for school board approval through a com-prehensive process by a districtwide committee of teachers and administrators. Texts and instructional materials for grades 9-12 are reviewed by a school site committee and submitted for review and ap-proval by the school board. Members of the public are invited to review recommended materials and make comments prior to board approval.

Availability of Textbooks and Instructional MaterialsThe following lists the percentage of pupils who lack their own assigned textbooks and instructional materials.

Quality of Textbooks

2014-15 School Year

Criteria Yes/No

Are the textbooks adopted from the most recent state-approved or local governing board approved list?

Yes

Are the textbooks consistent with the content and cycles of the curriculum frameworks adopted by the State Board of Education?

Yes

Does every student, including English Learners, have access to their own textbooks and instructional materials to use in class and to take home?

Yes

Quality of TextbooksThe following table outlines the criteria required for choosing textbooks and instructional materials.

2014-15 School YearCurrency of Textbook Data

Data Collection Date 10/2014

Currency of Textbook DataThis table displays the date when the textbook and instructional materials information was collected and verified.



• Systems:Gas systems and pipes, sewer, mechanical systems (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning)

• Interior: Interior surfaces (floors, ceilings, walls and window casings)

• Cleanliness: Pest and vermin control, overall cleanliness (school grounds, buildings, rooms and common areas)

• Electrical:Electrical systems (interior and exterior)

• Restrooms/fountains: Restrooms, sinks/drinking fountains (interior and exterior)

• Safety: Fire-safety equipment, emergency systems, hazardous materials (interior and exterior)

• Structural:Structural damage, roofs

• External: Windows, doors, gates, fences, playgrounds, school grounds

School Facility Items Inspected The tables show the results of the school’s most recent inspection using the Facility Inspection Tool (FIT) or equivalent school form. The following is a list of items inspected.

2014-15 School YearDeficiencies and Repairs

Items Inspected Deficiencies, Action Taken or Planned, and Date of Action

Interior

Interior painting is necessary, as budget allows tentative schedule 2016-17 school year. Custodians will be immediately directed to replace burned-out lightbulbs. Work orders will be submitted for necessary repairs including unsecure shelves, floor tile and ceiling tile replacement; completion prior to April 2015.

Cleanliness

Overall cleanliness: Teachers will be immediately instructed to remove excessive artwork hanging from light fixtures as well as control of overhead storage. Custodians will be immediately directed to improve the normal daily cleaning as well as attention to vents.

Deficiencies and RepairsThe table lists the repairs required for all deficiencies found during the site inspection. Regardless of each item’s repair status, all deficiencies are listed.

School FacilitiesContinued from left

Physical education areas, athletic field space, and aquatic settings support physi-cal education instruction, athletic competi-tion and other instructional activities. The school library provides print materials, reference items, technology for student use, and space for students to engage in individual and group work. We make every effort to keep our campus clean and graffiti-free; we strive to have an environ-ment that is conducive to student learning. Our facility is well maintained and is in well-functioning condition.

Due to the passage of several districtwide bond measures, Malibu High School is planning to replace its library and adminis-tration building with a new, state-of-the-art facility that includes a library, administra-tive offices and middle school classrooms. Our existing middle school building is slated to be completely renovated.

The district continues to keep its Deferred Maintenance fund open, however, the flexibility provided by the state allowed us to use balances in this fund to relieve the general fund, due to shortages in state funding. This flexibility was between 2010-11 and 2013-14 fiscal years. The district did not transfer any of the Deferred Maintenance fund balance back to the general fund, nor did the district make new contributions to the fund. With the change in the state’s funding model for schools the amounts considered Deferred Maintenance in the past are now appropri-ated in the general fund of a school district through the Local Control Funding (LCFF) formula. It is at the discretion of the local school board to determine how much of their LCFF funding is used for deferred maintenance. In SMMUSD the decision was to contribute $175,000 in 2014-15 and increase that amount to $250,000 a year beginning in 2015-16. To facilitate tracking of those expenditures, the district will transfer the general fund contribution from LCFF to the existing Deferred Mainte-nance fund. The balances remaining in the Deferred Maintenance fund will continue to be used on approved maintenance projects. The district is carefully deciding which projects to move forward. Decisions about deferred maintenance type expendi-tures in the future will become part of the district’s budget process.

School Facility Good Repair Status This inspection determines the school facility’s good repair status using ratings of good condition, fair condition or poor condition. The overall summary of facility conditions uses ratings of exemplary, good, fair or poor.

2014-15 School YearSchool Facility Good Repair Status

Items Inspected Repair Status Items Inspected Repair Status

Systems Good Restrooms/fountains Good

Interior Poor Safety Good

Cleanliness Fair Structural Good

Electrical Good External Good

Overall summary of facility conditions Good

Date of the most recent school site inspection 10/10/2014

Date of the most recent completion of the inspection form 10/10/2014

School FacilitiesThe Malibu High facilities support the needs of comprehensive academic, co- and extracurricular pro-grams. The facilities include general education classrooms, science labs, visual arts classrooms, pho-tography classroom with dark room and computer lab, instrumental and vocal music rooms with practice rooms, two computer labs, library with computer lab, swimming pool, tennis courts, baseball field, soft-ball field, football field, auditorium, a physical education gymnasium, a competitive gymnasium, outdoor amphitheater, and an all-weather track facility. Teachers have a faculty lounge with adjacent workroom used for producing instructional materials. Classrooms meet specific square footage guidelines and are equipped with whiteboards, classroom materials, audiovisual equipment, computers, laboratory equipment, and needed support materials. Teachers structure their classroom settings to meet their program’s needs. Classroom environments allow students to work individually, in small groups and in whole-class settings.

Continued on sidebar


Three-Year Data ComparisonTeacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Malibu HS

Teachers 12-13 13-14 14-15

Teacher misassignments of English learners 5 5 5

Total teacher misassignments 6 6 6

Vacant teacher positions 0 0 0

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsThis table displays the number of teacher misassignments (positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.) and the number of vacant teacher positions (not filled by a single designated teacher assigned to teach the entire course at the beginning of the school year or semester). Please note total teacher misassignments includes the num-ber of teacher misassignments of English learners.

2013-14 School YearNo Child Left Behind Compliant Teachers

Percent of Classes in Core Academic Subjects

Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Malibu HS 100.00% 0.00%

All schools in district 92.54% 7.46%

High-poverty schools in district 100.00% 0.00%

Low-poverty schools in district 91.18% 8.82%

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified TeachersThe No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) extended ESEA to require that core academic subjects be taught by Highly Qualified Teachers, defined as having at least a bachelor’s degree, an appropriate California teaching credential, and demonstrated competence for each core academic subject area he or she teaches. The table displays data regarding highly qualified teachers from the 2013-14 school year.

High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student participation of approximately 40 per-cent or more in the free and reduced priced meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student participation of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced priced meals program. For more information on teacher qualifications related to NCLB, visit www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/tq.

“Malibu High School is committed to ensuring a safe school defined

by a respectful learning environment, balanced

with appropriate standards of behavior.”

Academic Counselors and School Support Staff Data

2013-14 School Year

Academic Counselors

FTE of academic counselors 4.0

Ratio of students per academic counselor 292:1

Support Staff FTE

Social/behavioral or career development counselors 0.0

Library media teacher (librarian) 1.0

Library media services staff (paraprofessional) 1.0

Psychologist 1.0

Social worker 0.0

Nurse 1.0

Speech/language/hearing specialist 0.5

Resource specialist (non-teaching) 0.0

Academic Counselors and School Support StaffThis table displays information about aca-demic counselors and support staff at the school and their full-time equivalent (FTE).

Three-Year Data Comparison

Teacher QualificationsThis table shows information about teacher credentials and teacher qualifications. Teachers without a full credential include teachers with district and university internships, pre-internships, emergency or other permits, and waivers. For more information on teacher credentials, visit www.ctc.ca.gov.

Teacher Credential Information

Santa Monica-Malibu USD Malibu HS

Teachers 14-15 12-13 13-14 14-15

With full credential 555 56 54 55

Without full credential 8 1 0 0

Teaching outside subject area of competence 13 3 3 1

Data for this year’s SARC was provided by the California Department of Education (CDE), school, and district offices. For additional information on California schools and districts, please visit DataQuest at http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest. DataQuest is an online resource that provides reports for accountability, test data, enrollment, graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. For further information regarding the data elements and terms used in the SARC see the Academic Performance Index Reports Information Guide located on the CDE API Web page at www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap. Per Education Code Section 35256, each school district shall make hard copies of its annually updated report card available, upon request, on or before February 1 of each year.

All data accurate as of December 2014.

School Accountability Report Card

PubliShed by:

www.sia-us.com | 800.487.9234



2012-13 Fiscal YearDistrict Salary Data

Santa Monica- Malibu USD Similar Sized District

Beginning teacher salary $44,341 $41,318

Midrange teacher salary $66,205 $65,615

Highest teacher salary $89,135 $84,981

Average elementary school principal salary $110,750 $107,624

Average middle school principal salary $121,010 $112,817

Average high school principal salary $125,651 $121,455

Superintendent salary $230,000 $206,292

Teacher salaries — percent of budget 37% 40%

Administrative salaries — percent of budget 6% 5%

2012-13 Fiscal YearFinancial Data Comparison

Expenditures Per Pupil From

Unrestricted Sources

Annual Average Teacher

Salary

Malibu HS $5,617 $72,583

Santa Monica-Malibu USD $7,252 $74,779

California $4,690 $69,360

School and district — percent difference -22.5% -2.9%

School and California — percent difference +19.8% +4.6%

Financial Data The financial data displayed in this SARC is from the 2012-13 fiscal year. The most current fiscal infor-mation available provided by the state is always two years behind the current school year, and one year behind most other data included in this report. For detailed information on school expenditures for all districts in California, see the CDE Current Expense of Education & Per-pupil Spending Web page at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec. For information on teacher salaries for all districts in California, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs. To look up expenditures and salaries for a specific school district, see the Ed-Data website at www.ed-data.org.

District Financial DataThis table displays district teacher and administrative salary information and compares the figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and size based on the salary schedule. Note the district salary data does not include benefits.

Financial Data ComparisonThis table displays the school’s per-pupil expenditures from unrestricted sources and the school’s aver-age teacher salary and compares it to the district and state data.

School Financial Data

2012-13 Fiscal Year

Total expenditures per pupil $5,909

Expenditures per pupil from restricted sources $292

Expenditures per pupil from unrestricted sources $5,617

Annual average teacher salary $72,583

School Financial DataThe following table displays the school’s average teacher salary and a breakdown of the school’s expenditures per pupil from unrestricted and restricted sources.

Expenditures Per PupilSupplemental/restricted expenditures come from money whose use is controlled by law or by a donor. Money that is designated for specific purposes by the district or governing board is not consid-ered restricted. Basic/unrestricted expen-ditures are from money whose use, except for general guidelines, is not controlled by law or by a donor.

School safety plan is the only other local measure of School Climate (Priority 6) that is reflected in the SARC.1

English, mathematics and physical education are the only subject areas included in Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8) that are reflected in the SARC.2

Alignment Between the Eight State Priority Areas and the SARC

Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) RequirementsThe table below outlines the eight state priority areas and whether or not the data are included in the School Accountability Report Card.

School safety plan is the only other local measure of School Climate (Priority 6) that is reflected in the SARC.1

English, mathematics and physical education are the only subject areas included in Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8) that are reflected in the SARC.2

Local Control Accountability Plan Requirements

Education Code (EC) Data Required in the SARC

Priority 1: Basic

Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching. EC § 52060 (d)(1) Yes

Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials. EC § 52060 (d)(1) Yes

School facilities are maintained in good repair. EC § 52060 (d)(1) Yes

Priority 2: Implementation of State Standards

Implementation of academic content and performance standards adopted by the state board for all students, including English Language Development standards for English learners. EC § 52060 (d)(2) No

Priority 3: Parental Involvement

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each school site. EC § 52060 (d)(3) Yes

Priority 4: Pupil Achievement

Statewide assessments (e.g., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress). EC § 52060 (d)(4)(A) Yes

The Academic Performance Index. EC § 52060 (d)(4)(B) Yes

The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. EC § 52060 (d)(4)(C)

Yes

The percentage of English learners who make progress toward English proficiency (e.g., California English Language Development Test). EC § 52060 (d)(4)(D) No

The English learner reclassification rate. EC § 52060 (d)(4)(E) No

The percentage of pupils who have passed an advanced placement examination with a score of 3 or higher. EC § 52060 (d)(4)(F) No

The percentage of pupils who participate in, and demonstrate college preparedness pursuant to, the Early Assessment Program. EC § 52060 (d)(4)(G) No

Priority 5: Pupil Engagement

School attendance rates. EC § 52060 (d)(5)(A) No

Chronic absenteeism rates. EC § 52060 (d)(5)(B) No

Middle school dropout rates. EC § 52060 (d)(5)(C) No

High school dropout rates. EC § 52060 (d)(5)(D) Yes

High school graduation rates. EC § 52060 (d)(5)(E) Yes

Priority 6: School Climate

Pupil suspension rates. EC § 52060 (d)(6)(A) Yes

Pupil expulsion rates. EC § 52060 (d)(6)(B) Yes

Other local measures including surveys of students, parents, and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. EC § 52060 (d)(6)(C) Yes1

Priority 7: Course Access

Pupils have access to and are enrolled in a broad course of study that includes all subject areas. EC § 52060 (d)(7) No

Priority 8: Other Pupil Outcomes

Pupil outcomes in subject areas such as English, mathematics, social sciences, science, visual and performing arts, health, physical education, career technical education, and other studies prescribed by the governing board. EC § 52060 (d)(8) Yes2

Documents

Malibu High School