Malorie CLERMONT Local Leader on WP1.5 - Hespul RENAISSANCE LYON – 28/04/2009- Lyon Technical Seminar WP 1.5: Socio-economic activities – Presentation

Malorie CLERMONTLocal Leader on WP1.5 - Hespul

RENAISSANCE LYON – 28/04/2009- LyonTechnical Seminar WP 1.5:

Socio-economic activities – Presentation of local activities & Concerto Plus Matrix

indicators

RENAISSANCE : a CONCERTO project financed by the European Commission on the six framework programme

RENAISSANCE - LYON -FRANCE

2

1. “Buying my house”

- Objective: knowledge of the Concerto measures, interest for high performance buildings, RUE and RES

- Methodology: questionnaires to sales agents

- Conclusions: (private housing)

- Concerto programme : not really understood- Sustainable development/protection of environment =

“fashion”- People not really interested in energy saving measure- Interests: operation of urban renewal, closed to the

city center, green spaces…

“3 steps” local action plan

1st step presentation



3

2. “Preparing my arrival”- Objective: to help the inhabitants “to take possession” of their house

- Methodology:

“Welcome and orientation booklet” : advices and Concerto information

questionnaires to future inhabitants


2nd step presentation



4

2. “Preparing my arrival”- Questionnaires for the future inhabitants

- to give the questionnaire during the Welcome sessions for inhabitants (organized by SPLA Lyon Confluence)

Welcome sessions will be probably held during the week-end (on Saturdays)

Description of this Welcome Session (content) : - Presentation of the whole Confluence project- Presentation of climate change, efficient buildings…- Presentation of the “Welcome and orientation booklet”

- Diffusion of a questionnaire (see following slides): - 1 page to fulfil (1 recto)- To ask for the e-mail (voluntary approach)


2nd step presentation



5



6



7



8

Under discussion (still) amongst partners Next steps (after the 1st questionnaire) :- To send 1 bigger questionnaire (2-3 months after

the installation in the apartment)- Or: to send 2-3 questionnaires with different

themes to follow the inhabitants during 1 year (or less)

- Objectives:- To make a comparison possible with the

questionnaire of step 3- To include some ConcertoPlus indicators- To compare with Enertech data (monitoring): at

least Enertech will not pass a questionnaire has he did in the past

Following-up methodology to go further with future inhabitants ?



9

3. “Living in my house”

- Objective: to understand the evolution of the inhabitants about their perception of the programme and to rectify the non-technical factors which lead to drifts, as a non-controlled use of energy (monitoring)

- Who: inhabitants

- Methodology: interviews and/or questionnaires

- « environmental habits »

- attitude before and after living in a Concerto area


3rd step presentation (later)



10

Grand Lyon budget: about 30 000 euro (minus translation costs of the PSG)

• Training sessions with inhabitants

• To be in contact with social housing inhabitants

• To follow up the inhabitants (interrogations, help…): by which means? Methodologies ? To set up a Website ? By Phone? To employ someone in the Maison de la Confluence?



11

ConcertoPlus indicators (matrix)



12

Social dimension

No. INDICATOR UNIT / SCALE OF MEASUREMENTLYON-REN

a) % of addressees / inhabitants/ etc. satisfied with the CONCERTO measureWP 1.5

b) 5 point Likert scale: degree of acceptance WP 1.5

a) % of stakeholders / inhabitants / tenants / etc. who are satisfied with the level of information on the CONCERTO activities

WP 1.5

b) % of stakeholders / inhabitants / tenants / etc. who feel more informed about energy topics after the CONCERTO measures than before

WP 1.5

c) 5 point Likert scale: degree of satisfaction with the level of information on the CONCERTO measure

WP 1.5

d) 5 point Likert scale: perception on involvement in decision-making in the CONCERTO area

a) % of householders in the CONCERTO area taking part in a feedback system on their energy consumption or in an energy check

b) % of householders who changed their energy consumption behaviourWP 1.5

c) 5 point Likert scale: perception on how much the CONCERTO measure changed the behaviour of the householders

WP 1.5

d) 5 point Likert scale: willingness to invest in energy saving measures or to pay more for RES / EE / green electricitye) % of people who are willing to invest in energy saving measures or to pay more for RES / EE / green electricity

WP 1.5

1

Degree of satisfaction /

acceptance by inhabitants / tenants

/ owners

2Level of information

& direct participation

3Active/proactive householders

behaviour



13

Environmental dimension

a) % of reduction of CO2 emissions as compared to the basis year Enertech

b) % of reduction of pollutants (PM10, SOx, NOx, CO, O3, etc.)c) % of inhabitants in the CONCERTO area feeling that the comfort level (humidity, temperature, natural lighting, noise, etc.) has improved because of the CONCERTO measures

4

Improvement of CONCERTO district

environment and internal comfort

level



14

Economic dimensiona) Costs in M € per avoided ton of CO2 Enertech

Enertech

c) 5 point Likert scale: influence of the CONCERTO measures on the energy billsa) % of locally produced energy of the total energy consumption (thermal energy and electricity) - CHP

b) % of locally produced energy of the total energy consumption (thermal energy and electricity) - RES

ALE

c) 5 point Likert scale: perception / acceptance of local control of energy supply

a) Number of jobs created in course of the CONCERTO activities

b) Number of new businesses created in the CONCERTO area

c) Number of trainings/ of persons/ of day per person/ or hour per person offered in course of the CONCERTO measures

ALE

d) % increase in real estate and flats value SPLA

e) % Changes in community demographics - neighbourhood growth

f) 5 point Likert scale: perception of stimulation of local economy SPLA

g) 5 point Likert scale: improvement in the perception of demo site image/rank SPLA

a) Payback Periodb) 5 point Likert scale: perception of Pay Back Period of CONCERTO measures

WP 1.5

7Stimulation of local

economy

8Pay Back Period (investor side)

5Economic-ecologic cost effectiveness

6

Increase in local control of energy

supply / local energy production

due to CONCERTO measures



15

Presentation of our 1st draft of the Lyon Confluence “Welcome and orientation booklet”



Welcome and Orientation booklet

16



17



Concerto communities and projects

18



Renaissance partners and Concerto objectives

19



20

Malorie CLERMONTTel: +33 (0)4 37 47 80 90

[email protected]

Contact

ENERTECH

Documents

Malorie CLERMONT Local Leader on WP1.5 - Hespul RENAISSANCE LYON – 28/04/2009- Lyon Technical Seminar WP 1.5: Socio-economic activities – Presentation