Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    1/18

    Managing ServiceQuality & Productivity:-

    Service Quality Models.

    Applications & Limitations .

    - presented by Ankur Saraf & SurbhiMukherjee .

    MBA- FT /Marketing IVth sem.

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    2/18

    Summary:-

    Need for service quality models.

    Viewpoints at different ends .

    Steps taken for resolving the gaps.

    Determinants of perceived service quality .

    Gapsmodel.

    Process model.

    Identifying dimensions for the services. Nature of service expectations.

    Conclusion .

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    3/18

    Need for service quality models :-

    nature of the service industrytangible,dynamic,competitive and evolving.

    varied categories of customers.

    differing cognitive spaces and expectations.

    Perception of a service idea in managerscognitive space and potential customers

    cognitive understanding of it . Services change every year , in multiple phases ,

    and in multiple sectors .

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    4/18

    Viewpoints at different ends :-

    Manager- how he perceives it (service quality).?

    Customerhow customer perceives and

    evaluates ( service quality and performance).? Are there any discrepancies between their

    perceptions ? If yes , then how is it evaluated ,

    and resolved ?

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    5/18

    Steps taken to resolve it :-

    Forms the backbone or platform on which service

    quality models are developed .

    These service quality models begin by identifying, determining and analysing the gaps between the

    perceived cognitive spaces of the manager and the

    customers.

    ModelsA Parsuraman model given fordetermining the gap .

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    6/18

    Determinants of Perceived Service

    Quality:-

    Expected

    Service

    PerceivedService

    Service

    QualityGap

    Perceived

    ServiceQuality

    Word ofMouth

    PersonalNeeds

    PastExperience

    ExternalCommunicationto Customers

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    7/18

    Service quality

    "Service quality is a focused

    evaluation that reflects the

    customer's perception of specificdimensions of service: reliability,

    responsiveness, assurance,empathy, tangible.

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    8/18

    Experienced Service Quality Models :Gronnos

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    9/18

    Experienced Service Quality Models :Gronnos

    Technical quality refers to the result ofservice and/ or the question, what has beenprovided?

    Functional quality, on the other hand, refersto the way the service has been deliveredand delivered and relates to the question,

    how has the service been provided?

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    10/18

    The Gap Model :Parasuraman

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    11/18

    The Gap Model :Parasuraman Gap 1 (positioning gap)pertains to managers perceptions

    of consumers expectations and the relative importanceconsumers attach to the quality dimensions.

    Gap 2 (specification gap) is concerned with the differencebetween what management believes the consumer wants

    and what the consumers expect the business to provide. Gap 3 (delivery gap) is concerned with the difference

    between the service provided by the employee of thebusiness and the specifications set by management.

    Gap 4 (communication gap) exists when the promises

    communicated by the business to the consumer do not matchthe consumers expectations of those external promises.

    Gap 5 (perception gap) is the difference between theconsumers internal perceptions and expectations of theservices

    Di i f i

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    12/18

    Dimension of servicequality

    Reliability-The ability to perform the promised servicedependably and accurately

    Responsiveness-The willingness to help customers

    and to provide prompt service.Assurance-The knowledge and courtesy of employees

    and their ability to convey trust and confidence.

    Empathy-The provision of caring, individualized

    attention to customers.Tangibles-The appearance of physical facilities,equipment, personnel, and communicationmaterials.

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    13/18

    PROCESS MODEL FOR CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF SERVICE

    QUALITY

    DO YOUR CUSTOMERS PERCEIVE

    YOUR OFFERINGS AS MEETINGOR EXCEEDING THEIR EXPECTATIONS?

    DO YOU HAVE AN ACCURATEUNDERSTANDING OF

    CUSTOMERS EXPECTATIONS?

    ARE THERE SPECIFICSTANDARDS IN PLACE TO MEETCUSTOMERS EXPECTATIONS?

    DO YOUR OFFERINGS MEET OREXCEED THE STANDARDS?

    IS THE INFORMATIONCOMMUNICATED TO CUSTOMERS

    ABOUT YOUR OFFERINGS ACCURATE?

    CONTINUE TO MONITOR

    CUSTOMERS EXPECTATIONSAND PERCEPTIONS

    YES

    NO

    YES

    YES

    YES

    YES

    TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION

    TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION

    TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION

    TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION

    NO

    NO

    NO

    NO

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    14/18

    Various studies are undertaken to

    determine the relative importance ofeach of these dimensions in the

    perceptive space of customers by various

    field methods . Reliability andresponsiveness score the highest

    followed by assurance empathy and

    tangiblity .

    N f i i

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    15/18

    Nature of services expectations :-service expectations:-

    Desired Service

    Zone

    of

    Tolerance

    Adequate Service

    Level Customers

    Believe Can and Should Be

    Delivered

    Minimum Level

    Customers Are Willing

    to Accept

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    16/18

    The two level of expectations imply two

    corresponding measures of GAP 5:-

    Measure of service adequacy (MSA)= perceived

    serviceadequate service.

    Measure of service superiority (MSS)=

    perceived service- desired service.

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    17/18

    Conclusion :-

    Understand customers service expectations and how well thoseexpectations are being met

    Work systematically to remove organizational barriers that lead to poor

    customer service -- offline and online Recognize and capitalize on the increasing role of technology in

    serving customers, but

    Be cognizant of customers and employees readiness to embracetechnology-based services

    Recognize that e-service quality as perceived by customers involvesmuch more than having a state-of-the-art website

    Put in place a solid behind-the-scenes infrastructure -- informationsystems, logistics, and human resources -- to deliver what a websitesfaade promises.

    Continuously monitor customers and employees reactions to andexperiences with your electronic interfaces

  • 8/3/2019 Managing Service Quality & Productivity[1]

    18/18

    Strengths of service quality

    models:-

    Gives detailed informations about :-

    - customer perceptions about services.

    - performance level of services as perceived and expected

    by the customer .

    -impressions from employees about their customers and

    understanding.

    Assumptions and limitationsmarket research done isaccurate and updated .

    - customer needs can be documenetd and captured .