Upload
eugenia-lynch
View
18
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Manitoba Reading Scores on National and International Assessments. Adolescent Literacy Summit April 14-15, 2011. Purpose. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manitoba Reading Scores on National and International Assessments
Adolescent Literacy Summit
April 14-15, 2011
Purpose
• Manitoba’s scores and rankings in reading on the most recent published results from the Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) and from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) will be presented, followed by an opportunity for discussion regarding what these results mean for Manitoba.
The Assessments
2000 (Reading), 2003, 2006, 2009 (Reading); 15-year-olds; OECD plus ‘partner countries’; each province
2007 (Reading; 13-year-olds), 2010 (Math; Grade 8); follow-up to SAIP (13- and 16-year olds; since mid-90s)
Nature of the assessments
PISA• 390 minutes of testing
material organized into different combinations of test booklets
• 210 minutes in length
120 min: reading
90 min: mathematics
90 min: science• Student and administration
questionnaires
PCAP• Similar to PISA• Student, teacher and
administration questionnaires
Defining ‘Reading’
PISA• Accessing and retrieving:
locate, retrieve distinct pieces of information.
• Integrating and interpreting: make internal sense of a text.
• Reflecting and evaluating: draw upon knowledge, ideas, attitudes beyond the text to relate it to one’s own conceptual/experiential reference frames.
PCAP• Comprehension: explicit and
implicit info; vocabulary, parts, elements, events
• Interpretation: analyze, synthesize to develop broader persp., ident. theme/thesis
• Response to text (includes response and reflection): personal connections, emotional response, evaluative stance
Scales and Levels
PISAMean (OECD): 500
Standard Deviation: 100
Levels
Level 1 (a, b) to Level 6
• Level 2 (407 to 479): ‘baseline level of proficiency, at which students begin to demonstrate the reading literacy competencies that will enable them to participate effectively and productively in life’
PCAPMean (pan-Can.): 500
Standard Deviation: 100
Levels
Below Level 1 to Level 3/4
• Level 2 (380 to 575): ‘acceptable level of performance for 13-year-olds’
PCAP 2007 Reading Results
The first, most evident and ‘impactful’ result.
20 points ~ 3 percentage points on a provincial test.
Manitoba – Canada difference: 28 points
PCAP 2007 Reading Results
Less ‘impactful’, but illustrative:
Proportion of students at Level 2 or above:MB – 84%Can – 88%
Previous Manitoba ranksPCAP/SAIP (13-year-olds)
Reading (SAIP)- 1998: 10th
Writing (SAIP)- 1998: 10th
- 2002: 3rd (82.7% at Level 2+; 83.5% for Canada)
PCAP – Reading- 2007: 6th
- 2010: ? (spring 2011 report)
PISA 2009 Reading Results (15-year-olds)
20 points ~ 3 percentage points on a provincial test.
Manitoba: 495 (9th)Canada: 524OECD: 496
Manitoba – Canada difference: 29 points
PISA 2009 Reading Results
Proportion of students at Level 2 or above:MB – 82.4%Can – 89.7%OECD - ~82%
Below Level 2
Level 5+
PISA 2009 – Contextual AnalysisImmigrant Status (preliminary)
Province
Percentage of students by immigrant status PISA 2009
2006 2009
2006 to 2009 Change – 1st generation
Combined reading score
Non 2nd gen.
1st gen. Non 2nd
gen.1st
gen. Non 2nd gen 1st gen Diff: 1st
- Non
Abs RelProv X 0% 0% 530 502 478 -52Prov Y -1% -7% 536 524 529 -7
Manitoba 88 7 5 80 9 11 6% 120% 502 488 475 -27
Prov Z 4% 67% 532 551 534 2Prov XX 2% 14% 527 526 525 -2Canada 79 11 10 76 14 11 1% 10% 527 522 520 -7
Other provinces have proportions of immigrant students of 6% or less in 2009.
PISA 2009 – Contextual AnalysisSocio-economic Status (preliminary)
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65460
470
480
490
500
510
520
530
540
Reading Score vs SES - PISA 2009 (15 year-olds)
Socio-economic status (OECD = 0.0)
Rea
din
g S
core
(O
EC
D =
496
)
NF NB MB PE QC NS SK ON BC AB
PISA 2009 – Contextual AnalysisSocio-economic Status (preliminary)
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2450
470
490
510
530
550
570
590
PISA 2009 Reading Score vs Student SES
Canada
Newfoundland and Labrador
Prince Edward Island
Nova Scotia
New Brunswick
Quebec
Ontario
Manitoba
Saskatchewan
Alberta
British Columbia
SES (OECD average = 0.0)
PIS
A 2
009
Rea
din
g S
core