Manual Handling - Short Guide for Employers

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Safety

Citation preview

  • W T02C1519 CIOF!3AD7 L58 =----------- _____ ______ ---- ______

    Whats the problem?

    More than athlrd of all over-

    three-day Injuries reportedeach year to HSE and local

    authorities arise from manual

    handllng the transporting or

    supporting of loads by hand or

    by bodily force

    Most of the reported accidents

    cause back In Jury. though

    hands, arms and teet are also

    vulnerable The ple chart

    shows the pattern for over-

    three-day Injuries reported In199091 On average, each

    Injury results [n 20 days offwork, The cost IS enormous

    And sometimes the victim

    never fully recovers

    Many manual handllng Injuriesbuild up over a period rather

    than being caused by a single

    handllng lncldent, These

    Injuries occur wherever peopleare at work on farms and

    building sites. m factories,

    otfices. warehouses, hospitals.

    banks. Iaboratorles, and while

    making deliveries

    What should I do

    about it?

    Consider the risks from

    manual handllng to the health

    and safety of your employees-

    the rest of this booklet WIII

    help If risks exist, the Manual

    Handling Operations

    Regulaflons 1992 apply.

    Other: 17% Handling: 34%

    1-------r-

  • ........... -

    OO23A1O 37T _

    Employees have duties

    too. They should:

    These points are explained in

    detail in sections 4 and 5.

    Machine~: 5%-----------

    Fall: 8%-----------

    Struck by: 15%-----------

    r.

  • --------------------------------

    Avoiding manual

    handling

    Check whether you need tomove it at all.

    Bewarenewhazards from

    automation or mechanisation.

    can wrapping ormachining be done withoutmoving the materials?

    can you take the treatmentto the patient, not viceversa?

    an automated plantstill needs cleaning,maintenance etc

    lift trucks must be suitedto the work and haveproperly trained operators

  • m TEIZ!J517----- ---- ------------------- ----

    Assessing and reducing

    the risk of injury

    Who should make the

    assessment?

    The assessment is the

    employers responsibility. You

    should be able to do most

    assessments In-house; you

    know your business better than

    anyone, Most WIII require just afew minutes observation and

    the use of common sense.

    Adv[ce from outside experts maybe helpful in difficult or unusual

    cases, or to get you started. See

    the chart on page 7 for the kind

    of problems to look for.

    What role can employees playin carrying out assessments?

    Your employees can help you

    carry out the assessment they

    often know what problems there

    are and how they can best be

    solved. If their work is varied or

    not closely supervised, make

    sure they are aware what risks

    to look for when manual

    handling. and what to do about

    them. But the final responsibility

    for assessments rests with

    employers.

    IICIZ!3AJ2 142 m

    Need assessments be

    recorded?

    No, except where the

    assessment could not easily be

    repeated. In such cases the

    slgnlflcant flndlngs should be

    recorded and kept.

    Do I have to do assessments

    for each individual employee

    and workplace?

    No. Its quite acceptable to

    combine parts of assessments

    that are common to several

    employees or to more than one

    site or type of work

    The important thing /s to identifythe risk of Injury and point theway to pract/ca/ improvements.

    How should I use my

    assessment?

    Dont just forget t or file It away.The purpose of the assessment

    IS to pinpoint the worst features

    of the work and theyre the

    ones you should try to improve

    first. See the chart on page 7.

  • = TDi21J517 001?38113 087 W- -------------------------------

    How far must I reduce the

    risk?

    To the lowest level

    reasonably practicable. Thatmeans reducing the risk until

    the cost of any further

    precautions - in time, trouble

    or money - would be far too

    great in proportion to the

    benefits.

    Must / provide mechanicalaids in every case?

    It depends whether its

    reasonably practicable to do

    so. But you should always

    consider mechanical aids -

    they can improve productivityas well as safety. Even

    something as simple as a sacktruck can make a bigimprovement.

  • ---------------------------- ----

    Problems to look for whenmaking an assessment

    The tasks: Do they involve -holding loads away from trunk?twisting, stooping or reachingupwards?large vertical movement?long carrying distances?strenuous pushing or pulling?unpredictable movement of loads?repetitive handling?insufficient rest or recovery time?a work rate imposed by a process?

    The loads: are they -heavy, bulky or unwieldy?difficult to grasp?unstable or unpredictable?intrinsically harmful, eg sharp orhot?

    The working environment:are there -constraints on posture?poor floors?variations in levels?hotlcold/humid conditions?strong air movements?poor lighting conditions?restrictions on movement orposture from clothes or personalprotective equipment?

    Individual capacity:does the job -require unusual capability?endanger those with a healthproblem?endanger pregnant women?call for special information ortraining?

    Ways of reducing the risk ofinjury

    Can you -improve workplace layout toimprove efficiency?reduce the amount of twisting andstooping?avoid lifting from floor level orabove shoulder height?cut carrying distances?avoid repetitive handling?vary the work, allowing one set ofmuscles to rest while another isused?

    Can you make the load -lighter or less bulky?easier to grasp?more stable?less damaging to hold?Have you asked your suppliers tohelp?

    Can you -remove obstructions to freemovement?provide better flooring?avoid steps and steep ramps?prevent extremes of hot and cold?improve lighting?consider less restrictive clothing orpersonal protective equipment?

    Can you -take better care of those who have aphysical weakness or are pregnant?give your employees moreinformation, eg about the range oftasks they are likely to face?provide training(see sections 6 and 7)?

  • = TtlZC15Jq CI023AIIS 751 m----------------- --------- ------

    What about training?

    Training is important but

    remember that. on its own, it

    cant overcome:

    a lack of mechanical aids

    unsuitable loads

    bad working conditions

    Training should cover

    how to recognise harmfulmanual handling

    appropriate systems ofwork

    use of mechanical aids

    good handling technique(see section 7)

    Goo(d handling

    technique

    Here are some important

    points, using a basic lifting

    operation as an example,

  • - T02051J7--------------------------------

    luE3dlL d7/1 E

  • --------------------------------

    How do Iknowif

    theres a risk of injury?

    Its a matter of judgement ineach case, but there are certain

    things to look out for, such asexcessive fatigue, bad posture,

    cramped/untidy work areas,awkward or heavy loads or a

    history of back troubles

    Can you be more definite?

    Its difficult to be precise: so

    many factors vary between jobs,

    workplaces and people. But the

    general guidelines (see

    section 9) should help.

    So anything within the

    guidelines is safe?

    There is no such thing as a

    completely safe manualhandling operation. But working

    within the guidelines will cut therisk and reduce the need for a

    more detailed assessment.

    However, you should still make

    the work less demanding if itsreasonably practicable to do so.

    Are you saying / mustnt

    exceed the guidelines?

    No. They are not legal limits.But work outside the guidelinesis likely to increase the risk of

    injury, so you should examine itclosely for possible improve-

    ments, ie you will need to make

    a more detailed assessment.

    G General guidelinesS.>

    Each box in the diagram shows

    guideline weights for lifting andlowering. The weights assume

    that the load is readily graspedwith both hands; and the oper-

    ation takes place in reasonableworking conditions with the lifterin a stable body position.

    If the lifters hands enter more

    than one box during the

    operation, use the smallestweight, Use an in-betweenweight if the hands are close toa boundary between boxes. If

    the operation must take place

    with the hands beyond the

    boxes, make a more detailed

    assessment.

  • --------------------------------

    Twisting

    Reduce the guideline weights if

    the lifter twists to the side

    during the operation. Asa

    rough guide, reduce them by

    100/~ if the handler twists

    through 45, and by 200/0 if the

    handler twists through 90.

    Frequent lifting and

    lowering

    The guideline weights are for

    infrequent operations up to

    about 30 operations per hour -

    where the pace of work is

    not forced, adequate pauses to

    rest or use different muscles are

    possible, and the load is not

    supported for any length of

    time. Reduce the weights if the

    operation is repeated more

    often, As a rough guide, reduce

    the weights by 30/0 if the

    operation is repeated once or

    twice per minute; by 50/0 where

    the operation is repeated five to

    eight times per minute; and by

    80% where the operation is

    repeated more than 12 times

    per minute.

    Individual capability

    For the working population the

    guideline weights will give

    reasonable protection to nearly

    all men and between one-half

    and two-thirds of women. To

    provide similar protection to

    nearly all working women,

    reduce the guideline weights

    about a third.

    by

    Any operation involving more

    than twice the guideline weights

    should be rigorously assessed

    even for very fit, well-trained

    individuals working under

    favorable conditions.