20
March 31 2015

March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

March 31 2015

Page 2: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

1. VSB context2. VSB compared to Peer Group3. VSB Issues

Page 3: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

2015/2016 Context

• Enrolment• K to 12 - 49,731 FTE• Special Education - 2,320 FTE• Aboriginal Education – 2,000 FTE• English Language Learners – 9,715 FTE• International Education – 1,560 FTE

• Staff of 5,477 FTE

• Operating Expenditures - $503 Million• Annual Facilities Grant - $11.6 Million

Page 4: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

VSB REVENUES

…more than 91% of VSB revenues come from the

Province...

Ministry of Education Grants

$449.81(91.0%)

International Program, Fees, Rentals, and Other Revenue

$30.55(6.2%)

Prior

Year

Oper-at-ing Surplu

s$13.86

(2.8%

)

Page 5: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

VSB EXPENDITURES $503 M

…83.4% of expenditure is for instruction...

…approximately 92% is for salaries & benefits...

Instruction $419.28(83.4%)

DistrictAdmin

$14.97 (3.0

%)

Building Ops and Maint

$62.22 (12.4%)

Transport’n

$3.02 (0.6

%)

Other

$3.24 (0.6

%)

Salaries$365.47 (72.8%)

Employee Benefits$96.74(19.3%)

Services

and Supplies

$37.30 (7.4

%)

Other

$3.22 (0.6

%)

Page 6: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Vancouver Compared to Subset Districts

% of Total Enrolment Vancouver Subset

Special Education 4.72% 4.48%

Aboriginal Education 4.10% 5.50%

English Language Learners 20.18% 16.22%

Students / Staff FTE 9.60 10.30

Page 7: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Province of British Columbia CAMS VFA Facility Condition Assessments For All School Districts

October 16, 2013

Nisgaa

Buckley Valley

Peace River South

Campbell River

Cariboo Chilcotin

Nicola Similkam

een

Haida Gw

aii

Vancouver Island West

DeltaNorth Vancouver

Boundary

Arrow Lakes

Southeast Kootenay

Powell River

Kamloops Thom

pson

Comox Valley

New W

estminster

Surrey

Maple Ridge - Pitt M

eadows

Abbotsford

Peace River North

Kootenay Columbia

Prince George

Sunshine Coast

Nanaimo Ladysm

ith

Cowichan Valley

Saanich

Gulf Islands

North Okanagan Shusw

ap

Okanagan Skaha

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

School District

Faci

lity

Cond

ition

Inde

x To

tal R

ating

The Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is a comparative indicator of the rela-tive condition of facilities. The F.C.I. is expressed as a percentage of the cost of remedying maintenance deficiencies to the current replacement value. The F.C.I. provides a method of measurement to determine the rel-ative condition index of a single building, group of buildings, or the total facility (physical plant). This calculation also provides a corresponding rule of thumb for the annual reinvestment rate (funding percentage) to pre-vent further accumulation of deferred maintenance deficiencies.

Average Facilities Condition Index = 0.39

Vanc

ouve

r

Average

Page 8: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Vancouver

Richmond

Burnaby

Coquitlam

Greater Victoria

Langley

Surrey

North Vancouver

Saanich

Nanaimo-Ladysmith

Sooke

Alberni

Comox Valley

Abbotsford

New Westminster

Maple Ridge

Cowichan Valley

Conseil Scolaire Francophone

Delta

West Vancouver

Campbell River

Mission

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

23

1

4

3

4

1

3

2

2

1

1

2

1

40

24

11

8

6

7

7

1

2

4

1

3

2

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

Seismic projects province wideby school district

Supported to Proceed Not Yet Supported to Proceed

Page 9: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

9

ISSUES

• Annual Funding Shortfalls

• Funding Shortfall for Special Education

• Facilities Condition

• Seismic Program

• Bill 11

Page 10: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

10

History of Shortfalls

02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

$(30,000,000.0)

$(25,000,000.0)

$(20,000,000.0)

$(15,000,000.0)

$(10,000,000.0)

$(5,000,000.0)

$-

$5,000,000.0

$10,000,000.0

$(25,486,457.0)

$(4,437,510.0)

$(8,078,347.0)

$6,789,900.0

$(3,410,000.0)

$(5,820,000.0) $(3,540,000.0)

$(7,120,000.0)

$(17,226,609.0)

$(8,409,876.1)

$(4,602,139.0)

$(7,909,377.0)

$(11,640,616.0)

Year

Page 11: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

11

2015/2016 Estimated Shortfall

Page 12: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

12

Spending Per Student By Province

Page 13: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

13

Growth In Spending By Province

Page 14: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

14

Students Per Educator By Province

Page 15: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Special Education Expenditure vs. Funding

Fiscal Years Ended June 30

2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15*

Expenditure $68,268,020 $71,054,895 $70,638,412 $68,753,910 $71,816,396

Funding $40,348,200 $40,959,600 $40,757,600 $39,830,200 $40,332,400

Shortfall $(27,919,820) $(30,095,295) $(29,880,812) $(28,923,710) $(31,483,996)

*Projected

Page 16: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Facility Condition Index (FCI)by School

Page 17: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

VSB Seismic Projects

• Under Construction• Kitsilano, Q Mary,

• Under Design• Strathcona, Gordon, Nelson, L’ Bilingue,

• PDR Stage• Carlton, Fleming, Begbie, J. Oliver, Weir, Grenfell, Kingsford Smith, Killarney, Maple Grove,

D. Thompson, Tennyson, Jamieson, Hamber, Point Grey, Renfrew

• Supported / Future PDR• Names of schools

• MacKenzie, Waverly, Cavell, Prince of Wales, Templeton, Wolfe, Bayview

• Remaining: H1/H2: 24 schoolsH3: 16 schools

Page 18: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Bill 11

Implications of:

1. Professional development framework

2. Shared services

3. Accountability Framework

4. Disclosure of student data

Page 19: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues

Thank you

Page 20: March 31 2015. 1. VSB context 2. VSB compared to Peer Group 3. VSB Issues