53
Markéta Marečková e-mail: [email protected]

Markéta Marečková e-mail: sagova @vurv.cz

  • Upload
    zahi

  • View
    63

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Markéta Marečková e-mail: sagova @vurv.cz. Microorganisms in soil. S oil structure and its Soil ecosystem Trophic relationships Key processes Estimation, models and evaluation Soil is the most complex environment. E c osyst e m. Abiotic. Biotic. Func tion. Stru c tur e. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Markéta Marečková

e-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Microorganisms in soil

• Soil structure and its • Soil ecosystem • Trophic relationships • Key processes• Estimation, models and evaluation

Soil is the most complex environment

Page 3: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Ecosystem

BioticAbiotic

Structure Function

Page 4: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Soil ecosystem

dominated by

heterotropic organisms

•bedrock•darkness

porous mixtureof solids, liquids and gases

•plant nutrition•decomposition of

OM

quantity & quality of C

predation

Page 5: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Methods of study

Page 6: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Solids

Porous material of solids, liquids and gasesBedrock : e.g. limestone,dolomite (neutral to alkaline), silicate (acidic)

Determines the basic soil pH.Humus: Humic acids are aromatic and aliphatic remains of lignin, aminoacids

and sugars. Humus is a product of decomposition, microbial or chemical. Humus is usually acid and is negatively charged.

Clay particles: large surface, together with humus influence ion exchange. Negatively charged.

\ Adsorbtion afinity: Al 3+ > Ca 2+ = Mg 2+ > K+ = NH3+ >Na+

Abiotic factors

Maier et al., 2000

Page 7: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Abiotic soil components

mineral particles

mineralparticles

mineralparticles pores pores pores

organic matter organic matter

sand silt gravel

Page 8: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Velikost porů, odpovídající procesy a organismy.

Na velikostní úrovni jílových částic (μm) se vyskytují pouze bakterie a houbová vlákna. Na úrovni prachu (0.063 mm) a písku (2 mm) se vyskytují kořenové vlášení, kořeny, prvoci, hlístice.

Struktura půdy

oživení porů

Meier et al., 2002

Page 9: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Water, liquids

Water is the main limiting factor in soilwater content is correlated to organic matter content

Pore size:

macropores > 0.08 mm, gravitation water, plants mesopores 0.08 -0.03 mm,capillary water micropores 0.03-0.005 mm,inside agregates, bacteriaultramicropores 0.005-0.0001mm,inside clay particles cryptopores < 0.0001mm, too small even for macromolecules

Abiotic factors

Maier et al., 2000

Page 10: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Water potential: force necessary for movement of a certain amount of water under a given pressure and material

Adhesion (binding force to solid surfaces – matrix potential, Ψm)Binding to ions (osmotic potencial, ΨS)Gravitation force (gravitation potencial, Ψg)

Reaches negative values because it is compared to free water. Given in pressure units.

Free and bound waterAbiotic soil components

surface forces, Ψm, - 31 až – 10000 atm

capillary forces, ΨS -0.1 až -30 atm

gravitation forces, Ψg 0 až -0.5 atm

Maier et al., 2000

Page 11: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Soil structure

examples of characteristics

pH vodivost Ca Mg Al Fe humus % organic

μS mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % %

Alpilles 7.54 256 5900 184 3.0 1.0 2.3 16.1

Bozi Dar 3.27 47 1290 106 5.3 1.4 40.6 95.7

Devin 7.87 200 6210 163 3.0 1.0 1.4 12.0

Kotyz 7.52 310 7600 191 3.0 1.2 3.7 26.6

Meluzina 5.03 86 2700 137 10.4 2.5 18.5 7.6

Nechranice 6.08 64 3470 618 3.0 1.0 7.2 11.6

Oblik 7.9 200 6090 307 3.0 1.0 0.5 21.5

Podyji 5.55 75 2010 404 4.1 2.9 3.2 10.2

Rynholec 6.31 53 2840 83 6.5 1.0 0.1 7.2

Saline Giraud 8.12 21350 3150 67 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.3

slanisko Nesyt 7.97 537 3390 1250 3.0 1.0 0.5 6.6

Srbsko 7.65 141 4740 141 3.0 1.0 0.5 8.2

Slepici vrch 4.57 24 100 29 3.0 1.0 0.7 1.5

Trebon 4.01 80 1160 289 3.4 4.4 3.8 9.1

Page 12: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Habitat of microorganisms: variable in space and time

stratified by physical and chemical forces and important

nutrients– C, organické látky, 02, N, P, S microhabitat

• soil particles• rhizosphere• air bubbles • sufaces of

organisms

Soil structure and life niches

life formactive cells, spores, fillaments, collonies, biofilms

(obydlí)

Page 13: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Viruses,phages

Living forms

Page 14: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Diversity of viruses in various soilsLiving forms

•Comparison of agricultural, forest and alpine soils.

•Highest diversity (Simpson index) was found in forest soils

•The highest percentage of viruses were bacteriophages

Page 15: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Proteobacteria: pseudomonads, myxobacteria, rhizobia AcidobacteriaActinobacteria: streptomycets, corynebacteriaVerrucomicrobiaFirmicutes: bacilli, clostridia, laktobacilliPlanctomycetes

Streptomyces

Chondromyces

Myxococcus Bacillus

Living forms

Bacteria

109 cells and thousands of species per gram soil. Culivativable part is only from tenths to tens of percent Aerobic dominate the anaerobic in regular soil several times. Spatial variability is enourmous.

Page 16: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Living forms

Molds

Aspergillus

Algae

Cryptomonas

Blue greens

Nostoc

Blue green algae and algae live only in top several cm of soil. They often make a crust or a biofilm and they are adapted to very dry environment even deserts.

Algae and Fungi

Page 17: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Living forms

AmoebasAcanthamoeba

Paranema

Heterotrophic flagellates

Protozoa

Page 18: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Living forms

Euplotes, Stylonychia

Cilliates

Nemathods

Page 19: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Springtails

Orchesella

Mites

Living forms

Page 20: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Mammals

Microtus arvalis

Oligochaetes

Lumbricullus variegatus

Živé složky půdy

Page 21: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Soil horizonsstructure

In soil, organic and anorganic material is layered to soil horizons. They are created byplant litter and water from rain and groundwater.

Page 22: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Abundance and biomass of soil populations

Page 23: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Scale analysis (A) Distribution of soil patches colonized by bacteria in a two-dimensional grid with an indication of the four sizes of microsamplesused. (B) Same distribution after the test for the presence of bacteria. The black and white elementary units represent positive and negative results, respectively. (C) Corresponding curves obtained after sampling, showing the percentages of positive microsamples as a function of the four microsample sizes. Different types of distribution of bacteria are shown in rows a, b, and c.

Grundmann et al.2004

Distribution by source

Resources occur in soil mostly at aggregates of different sizes. E.g. in upper soil there are larger pieces of OM than in the lower soil. Bacteria aggregate as site of sources.

structure

Page 24: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Example: The highest number of bacteria phylotypes occurred in the clay fraction. Protection from predation. Fertilization does not change this relationship. Also highest diversity in the smaller pores – association with particles is stronger than the nutrient exchange

Sessitch et al.2001

T-RFLP profiles in three fractions of differently treated soils

Inhabiting pore according to its size structurete

rmin

al f

rag

men

t le

ng

ht

Page 25: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Organic matter main factor influencing productivity of soil environment. ovlivňuje:•plant nutrition •community composition•water content•agregate stability•erosion control

The main source of OM is the higher plants. One part of plants is quickly mineralized to CO2, phosphates, sulfates, nitrates etc. and used by other organisms. the other part is decomposed only partly and makes up humus. The ration of both components differes between sites, the most important factors being pH and moisture. Clay component and humus are the source of soil fertility. Both processes mineralization and humification are driven by bacteria and fungi. Bacteria and fungi add to humus also by their bodies which make a biomass of 40-200 g m-2.

„Hot spots“ sites of highest mircorbial activity. 90% of activity goes on in 10% of soil volume. E.g. rhizosphere and burries of animals

structure Organic matter sources

Page 26: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Relationships between contents of C, N, bacteria and fungi in soil at 5 diffrent sites (beech, pine, meadow, organic field, convention field at 5 and 25 oC.

Sites differ by:fungi abundance but not that of bacteriaFungi quantity correlated with C and negatively with N. Bacteria correlate with temperature.

DOC dissolved organic carbon,DON dissolved organic nitrogen

Example

bacteria fungi

NH4+ NO3

-

DOC DON

Nutritionstructure

Page 27: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

All processes are faster at higher temperature. Respiration is similar at all sites. Mineralization N, imobilization C and nitrification are the highest in a meadow and smalest in a forest

Example

Rate of soil processes function

mineralization

imobilization N nitrification

Page 28: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Soil bacteria according to the K-r selection

K organisms: slow metabolism, consumption of nutrients from small amoutns of poorly available sources, large genomes, filamentous forms, adaptation to harsh conditions (cold, deserts), stay at sites

r organisms: fast growing, fast reactions to a new source, consumption of available sources at good living conditions, coccal forms, fast growth, tolerate stress

Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Streptosporangium (podřády), myxobakterie

Burkholderia, Xanthomonas, Agrobacterium, entherobakterie

Nutrient consumptionstructure

Page 29: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

C content in soil by source

microbial C total Cug/g %

arable land 70 - 720 1.0 - 3.8250 - 1080 3.0 - 6.0420 - 980 2.5 - 5.5

meadow 2670 2.9470 21120 1.9

forest 420 - 1770 0.9 - 2.6800 - 1670 1.2 - 6.0

1670 2.1subtropical forest 330 - 1090 0.9 - 1.8

200 - 790 0.7 - 1.3alpine meadow 1000 - 2750 1.7 - 2.8

structure

Examples of organic C content and microbial C content. In meadow ecosystems microbial content is higher.

Page 30: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

•Soil trophic pyramid is not well known•Dominating process is decompostion Predation influences dynamics of the energy exchange processes •The best methods to describe are isotope probing •Limitation by C except in the rhizosphere (and by water as at all terrestrial ecosystems)

Trophic pyramidprocesses

secundary decomposers

PP

primary decomposers

predators I

predators II

nutrition

litter

shredded litter,microorganisms

decomposers, PP

predators I

chemolithotrophie

Page 31: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Trophic relationships in soil environment

natural meadow ecosystem

wheat monoculture

Agroecosystem is simplified,no mycorhiza, N2 fixation, limited nematods and increasing effect of cilliates

Page 32: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Trophic processesprocesses

Plant community

exudates litter

bacteria

protists

Carbon and other nutrients

ener

get

ic c

anal

bac

teri

al

fun

gal

Basic flows of energy and nutrients in soil ecosystems

Two basic types of food webs:

• based on exudates• based on litter

Food web in rhizosphere is fast. Production and biomass are several times higher than in the litter web. Interactions between plants, bacteria and protozoa are called a microbial loop. In this community, predators effectively control bacterial growth but the effect of secondary predators is low. Nutrients cycle locally and are not spread around. Plants give up to 40 % of assimilated carbon to rhizosphere microorganisms.

Bacterial food web is more typical for high pH , higher N, and lower soil moisture. Typical of fast overturn. Predators are protozoa and nematods. It is controlled by nutrients (bottom up).Fungal – oposite, controlled by predation(top down)

Page 33: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

procesess Trophic relationships

Page 34: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Example:

A field with convention farming (full) and a field with organic farming (dashed) were followedduring a year.Biomass of bacteria and fungi correlated with temperature.Maximum of bacterial biomasswas reached in relationship to soil moisture. This demonstrates limitation with water in a soil community. Bacterivorous nematods were highest in winter, which shows high tolerance to T and avoiding of predators.

Trophic relationships

Bloem et al., 1994

Page 35: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

predation predationpredation

grazingsubstrate processing

pore formationlitter fragmentation

bioturbation

Energy flow

Habitat formation

Function of organisms by body size organismů

Trophic interactions are fast while habitat formation is a long term process

Page 36: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Primary production

ChemolithotrophyFixace CO2

Energie: oxidace železa, amonných solí, sirníků, síry, kovů, dusitanů

Bernhart et al., 2007Jourdan et al., 2005

function

Zastoupení autotrophů podle qPCR Zastoupení autotrofů v průběhu tří let

Page 37: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Predation

soil predators: bakterivorous: protozoa, nematods, and bacterial predators phtophagous: mites, springtails

the main cause of bacterial mortality in soil

•no cyclic relationships•high redundancy causes high stability,•many prey species•fast nutrient cycle, mineralization

Predation in soil: consumption of heterotrophic organisms with detritus

Maier et al., 2000

Page 38: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Escape from predation:attachement to soil, small pores, pathogenicity, antibiosis, filaments, biofilm.

Protection from digestion: release of toxines, intracellular parazitism

Function

predation

Salinas et al., 2007

Page 39: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Movement of protozoa in soil: flagellates 2-4 cm, amoebas 3-6 cm, cilliates 1-2 cm

Consumption rate of bactria by prozoa. 5000 bacterial cells per min 800 kg of bacteria per ha per year

Predation

Ekelund et al., 2001

funkce

Correlation between the number of protozoaand bacteria at different sites in Danmark.The regular relationship on the figure demonstrates the possibility of bacteria control by protozoa at those sites.

Example:

Page 40: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Pisum sativum - Streptomyces lydicus – Rhizobium sp.

Streptomyces lydicus collonizes rhizosphere:

increases the number of nodules i.e. supports infections by nitrogen fixing Rhizobium sp.,increases the nodule surface, supports growth of rhizobia mostly by supplying Fe and other nutrients

Fe, other nutrients? Pisum sativum

S. lydicus Rhizobium sp.

nutrientsexudates, O2?

N source

Fe, other nutrients

N source ?

Tokala et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2161-2171, 2002.

Mutualisms of three species

Page 41: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Tokala et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2161-2171, 2002.

Nodes with a streptomycetes Nodes without streptomycetes

Nodes with streptomycetes have a large surface, which enables better nutrient utilization

Page 42: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Microorgansims are limited by specific requirements to moisture and temperature.They have limited or no capability to move. Microorganisms are dependent on dispersion by other organisms.

Everything is everywhere but the environment selects.

Limitation

Adaptation

Microorganisms are adapted to utilization of any organic substrate. Dispose of often large genomes, which contains pathways expresed under different conditions.Microorganisms grow quickly in the lab but very slowly in nature, one generationbetween 6 and 18 months, they are waiting for the ideal conditions to come. V laboratoři rostou velmi rychle, ale v přírodě je obrat mezi 6 a 18 měsíci.

Limitations of microbial processes function

Page 43: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Limitations of microbial processesfunction

Horizontal relationships – competition, comensalism, antibiosisNot well studies. Comensalisms occurs in C utilization. Cooperation in utilization of recalcitrant forms or in anaerobic conditions.

Example: „Disease supressive soils“

Use of antibiosis in agriculture. Disease suppressive soils are known for suppression of a specific pathogen, fungi, bacteria or nemathods. The most well known is disease suppression of take all wheat disease cause by mold Gauemanomyces graminis by antibiotics produced by pseudomonads.

Page 44: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

• 11%

• 20%

• Inoculated• Not inoculated

• Inoculated• Not inoculated

• Suppressive• Conducive

Disease suppressive soilsexample Tievaliopsis basicola

microarray for identification of 1500 bacterial genera

differences in composition of communities in disease suppressive and conducive soils

conducive suppressive

Kyselkova et al., ISME 2009

Page 45: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Biodegradation

Microorganisms oxidating carbohydrates:bacteria, molds, yeasts, bluegreen algae, algae

Only aerobic processdependence on temperature, pH and sources of anorganic nutrients

Xenobiotics: (pesticids, polychlorinated bifenyls, explosives, tints, chlorinated solvents etc.)some are structurally related to natural compounds – slow degradation by existing enzymes

degradation of completely foreign compounds takes much longer, degradation pathways must be developed

Page 46: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Genomes of microorganisms – what is necessary

Glass et al.: Essential genes of a minimal bacterium

PNAS 2006;103;425-430

„minimal bacteria“ - Mycoplasma genitalium482 protein coding genes, since 2002 Nanoarchaeum equitans, 491 kb)

→ 382 from the total of 482 genes of M.genitalium are essential

Page 47: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Genomes of microorganisms – what is necessary

Haggblom et al.

Degradation of MTBE, methyl tert-butyl ether

One bacteria in 109 which can degrade it. Took 5 years to find it using enrichment cultivation.

Page 48: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Biodegradation of oil

Bacteria aggregate in high numbers at the edge between water and organic phase, or are present directly inside the organic phase

Page 49: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Biodegradation of oil

Page 50: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz
Page 51: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes

Nature 452, April 200815 milion od sequences were evaluateddivided by metabolisms and functions

9 bioms: underground, saline, sea, coral, freshwater, fish, terrestrial animals, microbial, and moskyto

Sekvence divided also by the originto viral and microbial

Page 52: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Separation of sequences by canonic ordination analysis

Microbial and viral set differes significantly

Processes dominating for microorganisms:cell wall building, sulfur, signalization, movement, respiration, building of proteins

Viral processes:membrane transport, potassium, phosphorus, cell division, DNA, virulence, sekundary metabolites, fatty acids

mikrobiální

virový

Page 53: Markéta Marečková e-mail:  sagova @vurv.cz

Climatic changes in relationship to soil microorganisms