Martin Armstrong - June 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    1/18

    ANSWER:Yes. This is because government is a single entity. They will fght

    against the people to retain power. Make no mistake about it, government

    will always massacre the people to retain power. All such events in history

    unold when the people seek to overturn tyranny. However, there are

    rebellions even during a ublic !ave but these tend to be continuations o a

    grievance rom the previous wave. There were "# years between the two big

    $nglish ta% rebellions o &'(& and &)*+. They do tend to be more intense

    during rivate !aves. You will notice that in a rivate !ave then tend to

    come early whereas in a ublic wave then come late and typically spill over.

    This is because the rebellion aspect is really a separate unction o the !ar

    ycle. Thereore, it is an overlap that produces the intensity. urrently, that

    turned up in -+&).

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    2/18

    olitical wisdom over the centuries was purchased with the blood and bitter

    e%perience o generations upon generations. n $ngland when the /ing had

    no right to ta% the people. They had to consent and that was the reason to

    call arliament to consent to ta%ation. The frst ta% revolt was the WatTylers Rebellion, also known as the Peasants Revolt,was a ta%

    rebellion ollowing the 0lack 1eath as a result o high ta%es to und the war

    against 2rance 3Hundred Years !ar4. This took place beginning in May and

    ended in a massacre by 5ovember, &'(&. Then there was !illiam 36ack4

    ade 37 8 9:&-:&)*+4 who led a ta% rebellion which took place in May &)*+

    which was the sub;ect o in which he wrote

    his amous passage? @The frst thing we do, lets kill all the lawyers.3King Henry VI, part II, Act IV, Scene 2, Line 72 4. The lawyers were not

    @lawyers as we see them today. The king was the only person allowed to

    have a lawyer, so they were really prosecutors taking people=s property and

    imprisoning them or proft.

    n 2rance, there was the 2rench Bevolution in &9#- over ta%ation, but there

    was also a rebellion in &(*&. 0ut the frst ta% rebellion in 2rance was when/ing 6ohn was captured by the $nglish in

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    3/18

    uprising on May -&st, &'*(. The peasants destroyed numerous castles in

    response and indeed massacred all inhabitants. !ith the /ing captured,

    conusion reigned and the nation was plunged into civil war. The peasants

    were eventually deeated and they were themselves massacred.

    $ven in hina, the minister hao uo 37 8 &*)04 under the previous

    emperor hingFti 3Ciu h=i43&*9F&)&04, earned the hatred o other ministers

    ater he introduced '+ new laws. The outrage was so intenseG he was

    dragged out and e%ecuted in his ;udicial robes in the town marketplace. The

    abuse o the rule o law knows no bounds. !hen $dward 3&-9-F&'+94

    returned to $ngland in &-(#, he was conronted by corrupt ;udges who had

    been bribed by special interests and dismissed them summarily. Then in

    &-#+, $dward seied all the property o the 6ews and e%pelled them rom

    $ngland. /ings, dictators, and proessional political classes, have always

    e%ploited the rule o law or their personal gain.

    Massacres o the people in a revolt against government e%ist throughout

    history. !e should e%pect our modern governments will act in the very same

    manner. They are right now arming themselves and they have converted the

    police orces into military domestic units.

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    4/18

    Most people have never heard o the real man behind the curtain who

    inspired the whole idea o the $uropean Inion, probably because his books

    are only in Jerman. They certainly do not realie that his idea was to stop

    the inbreeding within $urope by mi%ing people and races to create the

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    5/18

    Inited

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    6/18

    idea based, in part, on the melting pot o America. However, he would take it

    even urther.

    Dn his return to $urope, oudenhoveF/alergi was no doubt the initiator o the

    arliamentary Inion, the concept behind the Treaty o Bome, and the

    evolution o the euro to attempt to merge $urope into the ederaliation

    process. 2inally, during "", oudenhoveF/alergi submitted beore the N.

    >ienna aneuropean ongress a memorandum or the uture o $urope,

    which is still regarded as an important guideline to this day. oudenhoveF

    /alergi managed to become an adviser to harles de Jaulle, Jeorges

    ompidou, /onrad Adenauer, and 0runo /reisky.

    The sudden advocacy of Schuble for German women to marry refugees to mix the races

    has a rather disturbing link to Coudenhove-Kalergi. n his book !"raktischer

    dealismus# $"ractical dealism%& he wrote'

    The man of the future will be of mixe race! Toay"# race# an cla##e# will

    graually i#appear owing to the $ani#hing of #pace, time, an pre%uice!

    The &ura#ian'(egroi race of the future, #imilar in it# appearance to the

    Ancient &gyptian#, will replace the i$er#ity of people# with a i$er#ity of

    ini$iual#! )

    In#tea of e#troying &uropean *ewry, &urope, again#t it# own will, re+ne

    an eucate thi# people into a future leaer'nation through thi# arti+cial

    #election proce##! (o woner that thi# people, that e#cape hetto'-ri#on,

    e$elope into a #piritual nobility of &urope! Therefore a graciou# -ro$ience

    pro$ie &urope with a new race of nobility by the race of Spirit! Thi#

    happene at the moment when &urope"# feual ari#tocracy became

    ilapiate, an than.# to *ewi#h emancipation!

    i/0ouenho$e'Kalergi 123, pp! 24, 25, 34

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    7/18

    There is a lot more going on behind the curtain than people realie. The anF

    $uropean idea will ail. They are missing the very element that made it work

    in the Inited

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    8/18

    under the claim o discretion, and the 6udiciary is responsible or altering law

    every day. 6udges create the ma;ority o laws to impress their particular

    brand o bias in a very undemocratic manner by using their interpretation o

    the words written by ongress in any Act or the onstitution.

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    9/18

    S#pre$e "o#rt "ases

    The

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    10/18

    would send you back in chains to $ngland with an e%planation o what you

    did.

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    11/18

    purpose was to protect the people o the Inited

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    12/18

    n a recent case, *S v Ar$an)o Portillo'7#no-, it was ruled that a ranch

    hand who lived and worked in the Inited

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    13/18

    laude 2rdric 0astiat 3b. &(+&F&(*+4 was a 2rench, classical liberal

    theorist, political economist, 2reemason, and member o the 2rench 5ational

    Assembly whose undamental ideas have provided a oundation or

    libertarianism. n economics, 0astiat is remembered or his concept o

    opportunity cost and or introducing the parable o the broken window or the

    @glaier=s allacy. $ssentially, a boy breaks a pane o glass in a shopkeeper=s

    store. The owner gets angry or it will cost him si% rancs. The argument isthat this is good or the economy, or now the glaier profts by installing a

    new pane o glass, thereby increasing the Kow o money within the system.

    Thus, the linear conclusion is to go around and break all the windows in town

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    14/18

    to stimulate the economy. 0ut what i the glaier paid the boy to go break

    windows in town7 Then it becomes raud.

    0astiat argued that there was an opportunity cost that was not being viewed.

    The si% rancs the shopkeeper must spend on the pane o glass may have

    been spent in a completely diLerent sector to stimulate that part o the

    economy.

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    15/18

    0astiat proposition o the @glaier=s allacy showed that we could create all

    sorts o innovation, reduce population e%cess, and create ull employment by

    ;ust going to war with everyone, everywhere, ;ust like the glaier who hires

    the boy to break all the windows in town. 1oes this really produce economicstimulus or is it merely diverting resources and destroying opportunity in

    other areas7

    Jovernments create public works as their frst move to stimulate the

    economy, but that is the mirror image o destroying everything. 2ine, we can

    create bridges and roads ew people travel on, but this comes at the price o

    diverting resources that would have created better economic stimulus

    through other, more permanent economic areas. Dnce the building, bridge,

    or road is fnished, the workers have no permanent ;ob.

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    16/18

    !hat will technology shits do today7 Inemployment is rising in the lower

    ;ob markets where robots can replace such tasks. !ith robots, there are no

    pensions, health benefts, or people like Hillary yelling to raise the minimum

    wage to U&*, which would only hasten the shit by raising unemployment

    sharply. As or war, government is already working hard to replace soldiers

    with robots.

    The danger o this advancement to robots is that governments will use them

    as police and they need not worry about the loyalty o the troops. Bevolution

    typically unolds when the military turns against their master. The best way

    to prevent that is to eliminate humanity in the police orce.

    0astiat=s @glaier=s allacy is still relevant today. The reason why is rathersimple. !e live and unction according to a bell curve. Anything to e%cess

    destroys the host. Yes, breaking one pane o glass does not alter the entire

    economy. However, i the glaier paid the boy to go break all the windows in

    town, all other segments within the economy would suLer.

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    17/18

    $verything within reason, yet government is never reasonable.

    "AP8TA98S7

    eople who claim that capitalism has ailed are seriously burdened with

    propaganda. apitalism is reedom, and socialism is eLectively the lack o

    reedom. True, we have done nothing but interere with the economy since

    the theories o Mar% and /eynes were adopted. Yet, aul >olcker admitted

    that this New Eono$ishas ailed. This whole theory was based on the

    idea that government could manipulate society to produce utopia, but theyhave never been able to achieve that. Carry

  • 7/25/2019 Martin Armstrong - June 2016

    18/18

    The system will always correct itsel as it has done throughout history, long

    beore Mar%:/eynes. t is always sub;ect to the business cycle, which is

    inKuenced by many actors including weather. apitalism began with the

    0lack 1eath. 0eore then, it was a highly socialistic world or sers. Youworked the land and kept -+W o the ood in return or a house to live in, and

    you could run into the castle when danger came. The 0lack 1eath killed

    about *+W o the workorce and the scarcity o labor resulted in landlords

    being willing to pay wages. The shortage o labor gave birth to capitalism.