Upload
dokien
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Context in Ontario
� “Ontario Students continue to show improvement in their achievement”
� “72% of Grade 3 & 6 students meet or exceed the
provincial standard in reading, writing and mathematics, only three percentage points from achieving Ontario’s goal of 75%”
� “Nevertheless, there has been a decline in mathematics results over the last few years.”
“Ontario students perform well on
provincial and international assessment results compared to other Canadian provinces and international
jurisdictions.”
Math Context in Ontario
PISA
PISA is an international program initiated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and undertaken every three years to assess the achievement of 15 year old students in three domains: reading, mathematics and science. Each PISA administration focuses on one major assessment domain. In 2012, mathematics was the major domain, whereas reading and science were minor domains. In the PISA context, ‘mathematics’ denotes ‘mathematical literacy’ which implies a focus on students’ active engagement in mathematics and their preparedness for life in a modern society. As such, it is expected that students can demonstrate their capacity to use mathematical content and language in contexts that are appropriate for 15 year olds, when they are close to the end of their formal mathematics training.
PISA
Our Strengths:
� One of the top performing countries � Smallest gap between those who perform well
and those who are struggling � Scored well on computational tasks.
What are our next steps?
Provincial EQAO � Overall achievement results for EQAO
mathematics assessments remain low and have declined over the last five years in English-language district school boards
� Achievement in Grade 9 Applied mathematics remains low in both English- and French- language boards
� A gap in achievement exists between Grade 9 Applied and Grade 9 Academic.
TVDSB’s EQAO
� Performing below province in all strands
� Significant challenges in open response questions
� In Primary, weakest area is Thinking Skills � In Junior, weakest is Knowledge and
Understanding � In Grade 9 Applied & Grade 9 Academic, weakest
is Application
Ministry of Education: Mathematics Action Plan
� The Ministry currently supports an array of professional learning opportunities to support the teaching and learning of mathematics
� There is no one single effective practice to
improve achievement for all students, but rather a number of practices that need to be in place at the system, school and classroom level.
Mathematics in TVDSB
Pedagogical Content
Knowledge for
Mathematics
Collaborative Inquiry for Learning in
Mathematics (CIL-M)
Professional Learning
CODE Summer
Numeracy
Seven Foundational Principles These initiatives are organized around the Seven Foundational Principles for Improvement in Mathematics, K-12.
1. Focus on mathematics. 2. Coordinate and strengthen
mathematics leadership. 3. Build understanding of effective
mathematics instruction. 4. Support collaborative professional
learning in mathematics. 5. Design a responsive mathematics
learning environment. 6. Provide assessment and evaluation in
mathematics that supports student learning.
7. Facilitate access to mathematics learning resources.
W Mathematics for Teaching
Job-embedded Professional
Learning
Job-embedded Professional
Learning
Reflection and Mathematics for Teaching
Reflection and Mathematics for Teaching
5 Attributes = Success in Mathematics
Procedural Fluency Skill in carrying out procedures flexibly, accurately, efficiently, and appropriately
Conceptual Understanding Comprehension of mathematical concepts, operations, and relations
Strategic Competence Ability to formulate, represent, and
solve mathematical problems
Adaptive Reasoning Capacity for logical thought, reflection, explanation, and justification
Productive Disposition Habitual inclination to see mathematics as sensible, useful, and worthwhile, coupled with a belief in diligence and one’s own efficacy
Teaching Through Student Work � In order to identify key concepts and strategies through
student work, we can consider using the 5 Practices of Orchestrating Discussion…
1. Anticipating likely student responses to challenging mathematical tasks
2. Monitoring students’ actual responses to the tasks 3. Selecting particular students to present their
mathematical work during the whole-class discussion 4. Sequencing the student responses that will be displayed in
a specific order 5. Connecting different students’ responses and
connecting the responses to key mathematical ideas.
Collaborative Inquiry for Learning in Mathematics (CIL-M)
� Building Math Bridges JK-2 � Developing Mathematical Understanding
Grades 3-6 � Intermediate Math C.A.M.P. � Cross-Panel Grades 7-9
What have we learned?
� Grade 9 Math C.A.M.P. (New) � Focus School Mathematics Pilot Project (New)
Collaborative Inquiry for Learning in Mathematics (CIL-M) � Collaborative Inquiry initiatives consist of series of
Professional Learning and In-School Sessions focused on developing teacher content knowledge and instructional and assessment practices.
� Teachers are supported by colleagues in implementing Inquiry based learning activities in their classrooms to engage students in real life applications of mathematics.
� Through focused classroom observation and consolidation, teachers reflect on the changing classroom dynamic and increased student engagement.
Professional Learning
Elementary
� P/J After Math Café � Primary Math Research � P/J Task Force � Gr 4 Basic Facts Online
Book Study � Gr 6 Number Sense Day � Gr 7 & 8 Basic Fact Boot
Camp � Intermediate Task Force
Secondary � Math Coaching � Math Learning Teams � Grade 9 EQAO in D2L � Math Subject
Association � Senior Task Force
School-Based Networking
Reflections on Professional Learning
“Very effective! It's definitely a new mind set to adjust to think about.”
“Very useful to plan inquiry lessons together and see what it looks like in a classroom.”
“Comfort in attempting new strategies with a group.”
“I can't believe how much I've learned!”
Thames Valley Mathematics Team � Superintendent of Student Achievement: Riley Culhane
� Learning Supervisor: Scott Armstrong
� K – 8 Learning Coordinators: � Stephanie Mitchell � Bill Nediger � Ann Pigeon � Christopher Silcox
� 9 – 12 Learning Coordinator: Mishaal Surti
� Secondary Mathematics Coaches: � Tricia Loney � Katherin O’Hara � Colleen Pollock