Upload
arleen-morrison
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
May 29 2008BangkokPage 1
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoEU Environment Policy and its perspective to businessldquo
Thursday 29 May 2008Imperial Queenrsquos Park Hotel Bangkok Thailand
EU Eco-Design and Strategies Benefits of being Green
Andreas MiddendorfTechnische Universitaumlt Berlin
Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe Fraunhofer IZM
Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25 13355 Berlin Germany
May 29 2008BangkokPage 2
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Materials
Life Science
Micro Electronics
Information Technology
ProductionTechnologies
Surface Engineering
Photonics
13 000Employees
app 13 Bil euro Turn Over
appr 65Contract Research
Overview Fraunhofer GesellschaftExcellence in Applied Research
56 Institutes
May 29 2008BangkokPage 3
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 4
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Design of green electronic systems
Analysis of electronic products manufacturing and packaging
Environmental assessment and life cycle costing
Transition management of lead free interconnection systems
Estimation of remaining lifetime for service and reuse
End of life strategies (reuse and recycling)
Demonstration center product cycles
May 29 2008BangkokPage 5
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 6
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EcoDesign Awareness Raising Campaign for
Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
28 workshops all over Europe (21 countries)
Target sector size 170000 SMEs
1200 participants (600 from SMEs)
Organised by Fraunhofer IZM Berlin
Financed by European Commission DG TREN
wwwEcoDesignARCinfoMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Workshop documentation
25 Business case studies
Comprehensive teaching
material
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 2
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Materials
Life Science
Micro Electronics
Information Technology
ProductionTechnologies
Surface Engineering
Photonics
13 000Employees
app 13 Bil euro Turn Over
appr 65Contract Research
Overview Fraunhofer GesellschaftExcellence in Applied Research
56 Institutes
May 29 2008BangkokPage 3
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 4
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Design of green electronic systems
Analysis of electronic products manufacturing and packaging
Environmental assessment and life cycle costing
Transition management of lead free interconnection systems
Estimation of remaining lifetime for service and reuse
End of life strategies (reuse and recycling)
Demonstration center product cycles
May 29 2008BangkokPage 5
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 6
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EcoDesign Awareness Raising Campaign for
Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
28 workshops all over Europe (21 countries)
Target sector size 170000 SMEs
1200 participants (600 from SMEs)
Organised by Fraunhofer IZM Berlin
Financed by European Commission DG TREN
wwwEcoDesignARCinfoMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Workshop documentation
25 Business case studies
Comprehensive teaching
material
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 3
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 4
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Design of green electronic systems
Analysis of electronic products manufacturing and packaging
Environmental assessment and life cycle costing
Transition management of lead free interconnection systems
Estimation of remaining lifetime for service and reuse
End of life strategies (reuse and recycling)
Demonstration center product cycles
May 29 2008BangkokPage 5
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 6
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EcoDesign Awareness Raising Campaign for
Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
28 workshops all over Europe (21 countries)
Target sector size 170000 SMEs
1200 participants (600 from SMEs)
Organised by Fraunhofer IZM Berlin
Financed by European Commission DG TREN
wwwEcoDesignARCinfoMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Workshop documentation
25 Business case studies
Comprehensive teaching
material
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 4
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Design of green electronic systems
Analysis of electronic products manufacturing and packaging
Environmental assessment and life cycle costing
Transition management of lead free interconnection systems
Estimation of remaining lifetime for service and reuse
End of life strategies (reuse and recycling)
Demonstration center product cycles
May 29 2008BangkokPage 5
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 6
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EcoDesign Awareness Raising Campaign for
Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
28 workshops all over Europe (21 countries)
Target sector size 170000 SMEs
1200 participants (600 from SMEs)
Organised by Fraunhofer IZM Berlin
Financed by European Commission DG TREN
wwwEcoDesignARCinfoMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Workshop documentation
25 Business case studies
Comprehensive teaching
material
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 5
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 6
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EcoDesign Awareness Raising Campaign for
Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
28 workshops all over Europe (21 countries)
Target sector size 170000 SMEs
1200 participants (600 from SMEs)
Organised by Fraunhofer IZM Berlin
Financed by European Commission DG TREN
wwwEcoDesignARCinfoMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Workshop documentation
25 Business case studies
Comprehensive teaching
material
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 6
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EcoDesign Awareness Raising Campaign for
Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
28 workshops all over Europe (21 countries)
Target sector size 170000 SMEs
1200 participants (600 from SMEs)
Organised by Fraunhofer IZM Berlin
Financed by European Commission DG TREN
wwwEcoDesignARCinfoMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Workshop documentation
25 Business case studies
Comprehensive teaching
material
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 7
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
bdquoReal lifeldquo motivation for eco-design
benchmarking with competitors ndash developing a better product bdquogreenldquo innovations ndash technological functionality and environmental
improvements realised in parallel Cost savings ndash usually through component reduction and decreased
material variety Serving a market niche Corporate and product image public procurement Selling a service instead of a product (RoHS WEEE preparation)
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 8
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Recommended follow-ups
(1) Further awareness raising and education Implementing eco-design topics as integrated or side-activity at
technological conferences and at appropriate trade fairs Qualified publications in technical magazines journals Integrating eco-design aspects in university curricula (mid-term
strategy) combined with educational services for professionals
(2) Eco-design implementation in SMEs Mentoring programmes for tool application and strategy development Regional working groups round tables on specific issues Information services Legislation orientations funding resources
matchmaking with experts Research Guideline for eco-design ndash the designerrsquos perspective and
merging of eco-design tools and conventional design tools
EU EcoDesign Campaign
Made inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
Made inMade inMade inMade inMade inMade in2005
EcoDesignAwareness Raising Campaignfor Electrical amp Electronics SMEs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 9
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts ndash examples based on
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia
Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 10
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Framework Directive for the setting of eco-design requirements for Energy using Products (200532EC)
Full text httpeur-lexeuropaeuLexUriServLexUriServdouri=CELEX32005L0032ENNOT
Framework directive = NO direct obligations for manufacturers
Scope
Products which are ldquodependent on energy input (electricity fossil fuels and renewable energy sources) to work as intended or a product for the generation transfer and measurement of such energyldquo
Ecodesign requirements
Implementation of life cycle thinking
Focus on energy (motivated by global warming)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 11
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Implementing Measures
will be drafted by the European Commission for
dedicated product groups
horizontal aspects
are proposed for product categories which (Art 15)
represent a significant volume of sales in the EU market (gt 200000 unitsyear)
involve a significant environmental impact and
present a significant potential for improvement
will be developed based on a scientific technical environmental and economic analysis (ldquoEuP Preparatory Studiesrdquo which will check Art 15 criteria)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 12
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
hellip
Compiled by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 13
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP Directive Introduction
Specific Requirements
threshold values for eg
power consumption in various modes consumption of consumables content of certain materials hellip
Generic Requirements
general improvement of environmental performance focus on significant aspects
ldquoEcological Profilerdquo
Assessing for individual life cycle phases consumption emissions physical impacts waste etc etc
Assessment of design alternatives
(consumer) information
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 14
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
nM
anda
te(C
EN
ELE
C)
Synergies of EU Policies
EuP Preparatory Studies
Least LifeCycle Costs
Improvement Potential
Significant Environmental
Impacts
Measurement Standardisation
Requirements
EuPImplementing Measures
u Pu P
GenericRequirements
SpecificRequirements
EUEco-Label
EU Energy Efficiency Label
voluntary mandatorymandatory
VoluntaryAgreementsWhen ambitiouscompared with business asusual andsignificant share of the market
or
Revision 5-10 years depending on product group and progress of technology but staged requirements possible Dynamic but predictable to encourage improvement products while providing clarity on investments for Industry Consistent - Thresholds to be maintained (A becomes D etc)
- Reward Development of lsquogoodrsquo products compatibility of incentives
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 15
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Num
ber
of u
nits
sol
d
Environmental performance eg energy efficiency
EuP minimum performance
standard
Before EuP
with EuP minimum
performance standard
with EuP minimum performance standard and
labeling
class G class F class E class D class C class B class A
Effect of Minimum Requirements + Energy Efficiency labeling
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 16
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Success Story Energy Efficiency Labelling in the EU
It works because consumer cares about energy costs
Market share of household refigerators and freezers
CECED 2nd annual report CECED Unilateral Commitment on reducing energy consumption ofhousehold refrigerators and freezers 2nd annual report to the Commission of the EuropeanCommunities CECED (wwwcecedorg) December 2005
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 17
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 18
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 19
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
European Commission Proposal
Tier 1 after 6 months
Tier 2 after 2 years
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power SuppliesNo-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Based on EuP Preparatory Study by Bio IS Fraunhofer IZM Energy Star database adapted by IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 20
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
External Power Supplies
Tier Rated Output Power
lt 50 W 50 ndash 250 W
tier 1
05 W 05 W
tier 2
03 W 05 W
No-Load Requirements for External Power Supplies
Technology Impacts External ac-dc power supplies based on linear technology will
see a de-facto ban with tier 1 Tier 2 will challenge also many switch-mode power supplies Tier 2 no-load requirements will result in a shift from (less
efficient) ac-ac to ac-dc power supplies (eg for cordless phones)
Ambitious efficiency and no-load standards are not likely to have an adverse effect elsewhere in the life cycle ban of linear power supplies means significant material savings
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 21
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 22
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Exemplary Assessment Results
source EuP Preparatory Study on TVs by Fraunhofer IZM
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 23
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Horizontal polarization filter
Thin Film Transistor (TFT)
CCFL or LED Backlight
Liquid crystal
Glass panel with TFT (ITO)
Front glass substrate
Cover (antireflective hard coating)
Vertical polarization filter
Color filter and Black matrix
Materials amp Design
PSU Efficiency
Panel amp BLU
Areas for Improvement of LCD-TV
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 24
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Overview (non-display) Technical Options for Lower Power ConsumptionOption Specification of improvement Env
improvement potential
Cost factor availability
High Efficient PSU(η 85 - 90)
Optimized power supply architecture (dimension) with specific electronic components choice and board design
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral Possible utilization of proprietary technology
Fewer Voltage conversion stages
Multiple power conversion increases losses A reduction of power conversion steps has a very good potential to reduce power consumption
Very good (+ +) Cost neutral or down(difficult to achieve)
Reduced power consumption of tuner and DSP non-volatile memory
Utilization of low power components and improved power management Non-volatile memory is mainly used already Signal and picture processing power increases with full HD
Very good (+ +) Cost increase or neutral(Possible utilization of proprietary technology)
Passive Standby reduction under 1W
Related to PSU design State of the art is le1W lowest standby down to 03W is BAT In standby all unnecessary components (functions) should be disabled (processor)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Active (network) Standby reduction
Active standby for downloading programs and information should be time limited Tuner DSP function is critical point of improvement (use of timer)
Good (+) Cost increase or neutral
Alternative power supply for remote control
eg solar powered Marginal Cost increase
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 25
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions General Ecodesign Options
Option Specification of improvement Env impr potential
Miniaturization of electronic boards
Higher system integration aiming on a reduction of board surface area and number of electronic components
Good (+ )
Reduction of number of parts Amount of screws cable metal or plastic parts etc Good (+)
Reduction of product weight Physical design of frames chassis thermal management elements (heat sinks fans) etc
Good (+)
Reduction of parts or materials that need special treatment at product end-of-life
Reduction of Hg containing LCD-BLU Reduction of lead in display panels Reduction of PVC in cables Use of bromine and chlorine -free flame retardants (today mostly phosphor based)
Good (+)
Utilization of hybrid or full bio-plastics
Modified Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) corn starch based polymers etc Only eco-friendly when energy efficient material supply is realized
Good (+)
Utilization of recycled materials Recycled polymers (eg PCABS) for housing Marginal
Avoidance of color layered (painted) or sandwiched plastics
Composite materials and surface finished (painted) plastics increases the treatment efforts during recycling Homogenously dyed plastics are the better option
Marginal
Component lifetime improvement and repair friendliness
Quality of power supply unit and main components such as the display However be aware that continuous power efficiency improvement could make faster exchange of product feasible
Marginal
Design for Recycling Easy disassembly of main components Display (incl mercury containing BLU) electronic boards steel frames and chassis large heat sinks etc
Marginal
Reduction of packaging material and volume
Optimum utilization of space use of recycled materials or materials that is easy to recycle
Marginal Good (+)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 26
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed Parameter screen size Additional energy consumption allowance for ldquofull High
Definitionrdquo TVs
PTVon = aScreen b Pascreen + c PBasic + Pfeature
With Pascreen = 0275 Winsup2 PBasic = 40 W Threshold limit for HD ready b = 1 c = 1
for full HD b = 14 c = 1
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 27
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions Policy Recommendations
Energy efficiency Based on results of the preparatory study
Threshold limit proposed for HD readyPower Consumption Reference Values for HD-ready [0275Winsup2 with 40W base] in correlation to Base Case LLCC
3337
2446
2009
1195
1013
1596
00
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Screen Size in inchsup2
Po
wer
Co
ns
um
pti
on
in
Wa
tt
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Limit Value
LLCC
23 26 32 37 42 50
Pbasic 40W
Pα screen 0275 Winsup2
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 28
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Comparison of Recommendation for EuP Minimum Requirements EU Energy Efficiency Labeling
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Screen surface area (in inchsup2)
Pow
er C
onsu
mp
tion
(in
Wat
ts) MR (full HD) Class G
MR (non-full HD) Class F
Class E
Class D
Class C
Class B
Class A
Televisions
Energy efficiency Comparison of power consumption requirements
Plasma full HD
RPs
Plasma others
LCDs
CRTs
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 29
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Energy efficiency labeling Based on results of the preparatory study
7 classes A-G proposed (coherent with existing classification for White Goods)
A 50 better than the minimum requirement for HD ready TVs
Each class means 10 improvement compared to minimum requirement
G for full HD TVs only
Estimate Rear-projection TVs are likely to achieve class A for LCD TVs majority might achieve C and D
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 30
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Televisions
Scenarios Business-as-usual Minimum requirement Energy efficiency label class B (40
improvement)
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 31
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 32
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Scope (EC proposal May 14 2008) Large household appliances Small household appliances IT and telecommunications equipment Consumer equipment Toys leisure and sports equipment Monitoring and control instruments
(might be overruled by product specific implementing measures)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 33
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Definitions (EC proposal May 14 2008)
Off mode
The equipment is connected to a mains power source and provides no function A mere indication of the off mode condition is also considered off mode
Standby
The equipment is connected to the mains power source and provides only the following functions which may persist for an indefinite time
reactivation function or reactivation function and a mere indication of enabled reactivation function andor
information or status display
(not considered as standby preheating functions sensor-based safety functions network reactivation and network integrity functions)
Standby and Off-mode
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 34
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Standby and Off-mode
Standby Power Minimum Standards (EC proposal May 14 2008)
2-tier approach Tier 1 one year after IM has come into force Tier 2 four years after IM has come into force
Tier 1 Tier 2
Off-mode 1 W 05 W
Standby (only reactivation function) 1 W 05 W
Standby (information or status display)
2 W 1 W
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 35
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 36
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Implementing tools for SCP amp ecodesign in selected EE SMEs in Malaysia amp Thailand
Project coordination implementing partner MalaysiaSIRIM Sdn Bhd
Implementing partner ThailandThailand Environment Institute
SCP ecodesign EuP expertsFraunhofer IZM (Germany) Universitat Rovira I Virgili (Spain)
Project duration 122005 ndash 062008
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 37
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Sustainable Consumption and Production
EU AsiaProEco II Project
Customizing of a set of SCP tools and practical implementation in target companies
Life Cycle Assessments (full scale assessments)
VHK EuP EcoReport (screening assessments)
Mass and energy balances
Compiling Material Declarations (products components)
Toxic Potential Indicator (focus on toxic substances)
Flow cost accounting (process perspective on costs)
Efficient implementation Choosing the appropriate approach depending on the company profile
7 Success Stories eg Bitwise Leonics Thai Energy Conservation as ldquoSCP light housesrdquo in Thailand
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 38
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
2005 EcoDesign Campaign EU Policy Framework
Energy Efficiency labeling and EuP Directive Technology Impacts
External Power Supplies Televisions Standby and Off-mode losses
SCP Ecodesign Implementation in Thailand amp Malaysia Conclusions
Outline
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 39
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
EuP For the first time a thorough balancing of life cycle impacts is the basis for setting legal requirements
Ecodesign of EuP means in most cases design for energy efficiency
Policy mix Minimum requirements (for market push) and efficiency labeling (transparency for market pull)
Minimum requirements will lead to technology bans (global impact)
Standardization and international harmonization are a crucial point for EuP (influence on standardization processes EU learns from California India is investigating adapted EuP approach)
Proactive company strategy is essential for global competition
Companies need customized assistance
Conclusions
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by
May 29 2008BangkokPage 40
Andreas Middendorf Nils F Nissen Karsten Schischke Lutz Stobbe
Dept Environmental Engineering
Joint International Congress and Exhibition
in conjunction with the 1st World ReUse Forum
A Co-Operation of the
Worldlsquos Leading Conferences
ProgramSun Sept 7th Opening 1st World ReUse Forum Get TogetherMon Sept 8th Opening Invited Plenary Sessions Evening ReceptionTue Sept 9th Sessions Podium Discussion Boat TourWed Sept 10th Sessions Panel Discussion Closing SessionThu Sept 11th Technical Tours to Specific Companies
Location Estrel (Europelsquos largest convention amp hotel
complex)
Chairman Herbert Reichl TU Berlin amp Fraunhofer IZM
Registration and further info httpegg2008izmfhgde
organized by
Merging Technology and Sustainable Development
September 8 ndash 10 2008 middot Berlin Germany
coordination by