McGillDAILY

THE

Volume 98, Issue 27January 15, 2009

Conflicted since 1911

GAZA THOUSANDS PROTEST INVASION IN MONTREAL news 2+3THE SHIFT IN POPULAR DISCOURSE commentary 6YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE CRISIS letters 9HAMAS MUST BE TALKED TO features 10+11STIFLING DISCUSSION WON’T SOLVE THE CONFLICT editorial 19

Inter-faculty Internship Information Session

Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:00pm - 2:00pm

Leacock Building, room 232

Learn about internship opportunities for returning McGill students

Hear past student interns share their internship experiences

Receive information on how to find internships in your field

RSVP to ion@mcgill.ca

All Students Welcome - Reception to follow

RSVP to

Rfi

Welcome

toto

me

RSVP to

dents WelcoW

Rfi

W

P

dentts W

VP

dents

p

mm

f

W

RSVP

om

RSVP

f

ts Wnts com

RSVRSVRSV

inteng

deh

msh

elcoelco

RSRS

mahi

ip

athipp

ellce

R

h

lc

R

den el

bout inor returnin

Hear past studeir interns

Receive informfind interns

Wel

at

R

All Studen

ttf

ts W

mns

t

enip

t

ipntp ppsh phipp

ents

enipipiiiph

g M

enippihin

Rfi

W

nndshs

nenneshs

nes

ehee

se

nin

d

g

ed

iv

rnr

AlAl

ecei

dnter

l

erer

ceeceiv

ntetheir intett

ei

e teir intttt

Rec

their inttheir intnt

M

cc

n

ec

n

c

their inn

A

ecec

in

ec

in

ecee

in

eRee

i

ReR

M

R

MM

r

R

r

M

Rece

ir

RR

terg

eii

r

th

r

their in

Bu

nterenteterereinbout inor

tetntn

HeaHea

bout infor

n

Hea

inin

HeHeHeHeH

ock Bu

earn about ifor

HHeHHHHH

abfo

H

n abfon abfon af

uuock Bu

n aarn aearnarn a

Bucocock ocacockacocLeacocck ock

earn

Leac

Learearn

cocoooocLeaccoacoLeaccococceacLeaLeaL

Tel: 514-398-2916 | Email: ion@mcgill.caLeacock Building Room 307 | www.mcgill.ca/internships

• Intensive 60-Hour Program

• Classroom Management Techniques

• Detailed Lesson Planning

• ESL Skills Development

• Comprehensive Teaching Materials

• Interactive Teaching Practicum

• Internationally Recognized Certificate

• Teacher Placement Service

• Money Back Guarantee Included

• Thousands of Satisfied Students

Teach EnglishOverseas

TESOL/TESL Teacher TrainingCertification Courses

OXFORD SEMINARS1-800-269-6719/416-924-3240

www.oxfordseminars.ca

Industry summer traInIng programfor undergraduates

Application Deadline: January 31, 2009

Participate in cutting-edge arthritis research

in an international industry lab setting

Salary : $16-20/ hour

Airfare and initial visa application costs are covered

For more information, visit:

www.arthritisnetwork.ca

News2

mcg

illda

ily.c

om

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2008 3

Montrealers march in solidarity with Gaza

An estimated 10,000 people marched Saturday in protest against the Israeli military

campaign in Gaza, part of a world-wide movement denouncing recent violence.

The frustrations of the crowd were tangible. Participants walked down Ste. Catherine from Peel to St. Urbain, chanting “Viva! Viva! Intifada!” and “Israel—Assassin! Israel—Terrorist!”

“I feel a little helpless,” said McGill graduate student Kianoosh Hashemzadeh at the protest. “I feel like this is helping me feel as if I am a part of a movement that is against the activity taking place in Gaza.”

According to the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Tzipi Livni, the aim of Israel’s offensive is to stop the bar-rage of rockets and mortars being fired from Gaza into southern Israel, numbering about 500 since the start of the 20-day offensive. However, due to the low mortality rate of the Hamas rockets, the conflict has left 13 Israelis and over 900 Palestinians dead. In addition, 4,400 Gazans have been injured to date.

Protester and McGill law student Maha Hussain defended Israel’s right to protect its citizens, but felt the Israeli response to be disproportion-ate.

“It’s like shooting fish in a barrel; they have nowhere to evacuate to,” she said, referring to Gaza’s borders, which have been sealed for the past 18 months.

The campaign was organized by the Coalition for Justice and Peace in Palestine, Tadamon! Montreal, and Solidarity with Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR).

Many Jewish groups also took part in the rally, including the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians (ACJC), Independent Jewish Voices, and Young Jews for Social Justice (YJSJ), a new Quebec Public Interest Research Group-McGill working group.

Elise Eisenkraft Klein, a member of the YJSJ, emphasized the diversity of voices within the Jewish community.

“I think it’s important that the Jewish community is not shown as being a monolithic voice, and that there are opinions that Jews have out there other than [those of] the big organizations and pro-Israel...lob-bies,” said Klein.

Speaking at the demonstration, Independent Jewish Voices represen-tative Abby Lippman called on Jewish

history to justify Jewish opposition to Israeli policies in the Occupied Territories.

“Silence kills. Jews know this all too well,” said Lippman. “We can-not stay and watch others kill in our name.

“We will stand up in solidarity with all those who are demanding an end to Israel’s attacks in Gaza, to the blockade of the Gaza Strip, and to the continuation of violations of human rights and international law,” added Lippman.

Aaron Lakoff, a collective member of Tadamon! Montreal, maintained that Israeli treatment of the Palestinians contradicts Jewish values.

“A lot of people have interpreted Jewish values to be standing for liber-ation and for justice. And what Israel is doing is actually smack in the face of those traditions and a smack in the face of all of humanity,” said Lakoff.

No opposing groups organized against the protest. However, onlook-er Yoni Khajehzadeh was displeased with the march. Identifying himself as an Iranian Jew, Khajehzadeh was concerned the demonstration threat-ened Israel’s legitimacy as nation-state.

“I’m not saying that everything that is going on in Gaza is right, but what I am saying is that Israel has a right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state,” said Khajehzadeh.

The Montreal demonstration coincided with several held across Canada in Ottawa, Toronto, Calgary, and Vancouver over the weekend. Tens of thousands have also protest-ed in Britain, France, Belgium, and Spain.

According to Nina Amrov, spokes-person for SPHR, the primary goal of the protest was to mobilize those outraged by the alleged war crimes committed by the Israeli Defense Forces in Gaza. The organization hopes the demonstration will incite the Conservative government to end its support of Israeli policies that fla-grantly abuse international law, said Amrov.

In addition, both Amrov and Lakoff underscored the need to con-sider the context in which Hamas has been firing rockets, saying the tar-geted towns – Ashkelon, Sderot, and Ashdod – are where many Gazans lived before 1948 and 1967.

“We’re talking about the Gaza Strip: 75 per cent of the population there are refugees. It’s the world’s largest open-air prison,” said Lakoff.

“People have to go through the largest obstacles in the world just to get basic necessities of life.”

Deborah GutermanNews Writer

Photos by Charles Mostoller / The McGill Daily

Homeless people who are rou-tinely refused from shelters because of cited misconduct

will now have a place to sleep. The City of Montreal will offer a new bed service at select locations to keep the homeless from braving the cold over-night.

Initiated on December 15, 2008, the service, known as the respite program, provides a small, private room to guests refused elsewhere for a period of 72 hours in an effort to reintegrate them back into the general shelter system. The urgency of such a program is marked by the death of André Gagnon, who died on a park bench from sub-zero tempera-tures in late December, days after the program began.

The Réseau d’aide aux personnes seules et itinérantes de Montréal (RAPSIM), a coalition that defends homeless rights, hopes that the inclu-sive nature of the respite program will attract those who previously avoided city services.

“The minimum is to offer a place where they can spend the night out of the cold…and to help them to take more long term steps,” explained RAPSIM member Patricia Viannay.

While emergency mechanisms have existed since 2003 to guarantee a bed to anyone who requests one, according to Cyril Morgan, Director of the Welcome Home Mission – an organization that reaches out to the homeless – many still choose to sleep outside or are refused access to shel-ters.

“We found that many times, men get turned away because they were not received properly or because

they have trouble getting their story across. They need somebody who will sit down with them and will say, ‘look, what’s your problem, how can we help you, and where will we go from here?’” Morgan said.

While intoxication, violence, dis-orderly behaviour, and drug use are often-cited reasons for refused access, RAPSIM suggested that the homeless are often refused for rea-sons more complicated than these labels suggest.

“[Refusal] is related to a combi-nation of problems: substance abuse issues are mixed with mental health issues,” explained Viannay, adding that compound problems compli-cate the shelter’s response to their case.

Morgan explained that the respite program aims to improve the alloca-tion of city beds, since most nights they are left empty as Montrealers prefer to sleep on the street.

“I don’t know of anybody who has requested a bed in Montreal, and [for whom] none were found,” Morgan said.

To date, the respite program has seen the Pavillion Patricia MacKenzie add two beds for women and Welcome Hall add four more for men to provide the respite service. Roughly a dozen people have used the service so far.

Jacques Bertrand, also of RAPSIM, regretted that economic constraints have prevented the creation of a new location catering

specifically to the needs of respite guests, thus requiring an intensi-fication of existing infrastructures instead.

“What we did was less spectacu-lar. The work was done quickly,” he said, adding that city institutions consulted only briefly before taking action.

According to Viannay, there are few real alternatives to shelters in Montreal. Inadequate fallbacks include cafés, open stairways, bus shelters, park benches, garbage dumpsters, heating vents, or the underside of sandwich boards. There exists no legal way to force the homeless into shelters if they

decline. The city seeks to catch part of the population neglected by the shelter system with the respite pro-gram.

Rejent, a man living on the street since his wife died six years ago, expressed no desire to seek shelter in a city institution, describing them as depressing. He was not convinced that the public is concerned with the circumstances of the homeless.

“We die like flies, and the world doesn’t care. We are a disposable community,” he said.

Funding for the respite program – provided by the province and the city – will expire at the end of the winter, but Matthey Pearce of the

Old Brewery Mission, a shelter in Old Montreal, stressed the need for it to be extended indefinitely. “While it may be true that you won’t die of the cold on the streets of Montreal in July, there are other reasons why you might be victimized and assault-ed, and at risk in the summer. So we think this service should be year-long,” he said.

The city resurrected the model for the respite project from L’Echelle, a pilot project run by the Old Brewery Mission a few years ago. L’Echelle ran out of funds and closed operations at the end the end of the winter, and the respite program will likely go the same way.

News The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 20094

Refused homeless get new bedsProgram likely to end in the spring when funding dries up

Hayley LapalmeMcGill Daily

While beds are almost always available to Montreal homeless, many still sleep on the street.Rachel Wine / The McGill Daily

Pro-life club hosts controversial event during interimMcGill students divided on Choose Life’s pictures of fetuses at crossroads

Pro-life group Choose Life could push for full club status by month’s end, provided that

the club’s interim activities are not considered unacceptable by SSMU’s Equity Committee.

At the October 28 Council meet-ing, Choose Life was granted three-month interim club status in a 21-to-two vote, amidst concerns voiced by students from the Quebec Public Interest Research Group-McGill and the Union for Gender Empowerment (UGE) about incendiary anti-abor-tion tactics used by similar groups.

Preceding the vote, Choose Life president Natalie Fohl assured stu-dents and councillors that the club would not condone “using graphic

pictures or circulating literature that could be construed as hateful.”

SSMU VP External Devin Alfaro assured Council in October that definite consequences would follow if Choose Life were to circulate any such material, and Choose Life was granted the right to free speech and regular assembly.

On November 24, at one of the club’s first events, Choose Life tabled at the McGill crossroads with displays of images of fetuses – an event Fohl hoped would bring the issue into public focus. The club established a voting booth and comment station asking when a fetus should legally be considered a person,

“We wanted the voting to spark discussion, encourage people to reflect on the question, and voice their opinion,” said Fohl.

Displayed on the table were to-

scale images of a fetus developing from conception. Each month of pregnancy contained different facts about foetal development, and each fetus “said” something in the photo caption, with the seventh-month fetus saying, “I can look around!”

On the table, in a binder, lay similar illustrations photocopied from a biology textbook, “Human Development.”

Diagonally across from Choose Life, a group of students organized an informal counter-protest on the corner of the crossroads, handing out pieces of cloth reading “my body, my rules.” Other protesting students’ signs matched those displayed by the UGE at the October Council meeting: “Legalize abortion” and “fight gender oppression.”

U3 Sociology student Sarah Golightly, a member of the UGE who

took part in counter-protest, was con-cerned with the philosophy Choose Life was promoting.

“[They’re] portraying people who have had abortions as immoral,” said Golightly. “I’m most concerned about the effect this could have on students [with] what I consider to be propa-ganda.”

The UGE is due to publish a repro-ductive rights zine in February.

However, U2 Philosophy Honours Trevor Bant did not react as strongly to the group’s event.

“I see no problem as long as they say things in a respectful and tolerant manner,” Bant said. “But I don’t know how many McGill students would be sympathetic to their cause.”

Fohl maintained that no pam-phlets were actively handed out, and those available for circulation con-tained no inflammatory or graphic

material, despite certain students’ charges that the club distributed hateful material.

Complaints from individual stu-dents can be made through the SSMU Equity Committee; the Judicial Board hears grievances between clubs.

According to SSMU VP Clubs & Services Samantha Cook, some stu-dent complaints have been taken up with the Equity Committee, but SSMU will not necessarily reopen the Choose Life debate at Council, as equity officers may decide the issue independently or defer it to a separate committee. To date, the Judicial Board has received no com-plaints.

Choose Life’s next planned event is a talk on Monday by Mary Meehan, a veteran pro-life speaker urging liberals and feminists to defend the unborn.

Josh NoblemanNews Writer

Check out the audio version of this story at mcgilldaily.com and broadcast on CKUT in the coming days.

ONLINE

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009 5News

A constitutional crisisCanada’s political chaos tops world headlines

Last year, Montreal experienced its lowest level of violence since 1972. This hopeful news is tem-

pered, however, by a year that saw violence perpetrated by both civil-ians and police that erupted after the police shooting of 18-year-old Freddy Villanueva in Montreal North.

Commander Clement Rose, head of the Montreal Police major crimes division, was quoted in the Gazette attributing the drop to the police’s recent campaign against street gangs. Their campaign includes aggressive enforcement tactics such as Project Eclipse, a special anti-gang unit focused on making arrests, and prevention programs that develop important ties to neighbourhoods where street gangs are a problem.

Victor Henriguez, a spokesperson for Solidarité Montreal Nord, a group of organizations that united after Villanueva’s death, noted a change in police attitude since the riots.

“The feeling of security for the people has increased because we have more officers on the streets,” he said, noting a big push by the police to help the community – including several collaborative workshops.

Still Henriguez felt violence is only one factor in the relations between citizen and police officer.

“I think that, yes, there is less

criminality, less murders, things like that; but there is still the problem of citizen confidence [in the system]. The system has a responsibility to maintain its own credibility – and this is where we want change. Because criminality has gone down, but confi-dence is not back.”

University of Toronto criminolo-gist professor Rosemary Gartner also linked the drop with a larger cultural trend.

“High intensity policies may have a short-term effect on crime, but after a few months it tends to go right back up.... It’s happening across Canada’s major cities. It’s happening in the United States as well. We are able to rule out some things as possible explanations; or say things may con-tribute...maybe changes in people’s attitudes and beliefs, tolerance for violence,” Gartner said.

“The best evidence of decades of research that looks at what police do suggests that the kinds of marginal changes they make from year to year don’t have a big impact on crime. The causes of crime are wrapped up in all sorts of economic, social, and politi-cal factors, and the police can’t get rid of economic inequality, the police can’t get rid of poor schools.... So I’m not criticizing the police for not hav-ing an effect on serious crimes: why should we expect them to?”

Henriguez has already felt a posi-tive cultural change in Montreal North.

“Since the events of August, I think we have seen a community that is ready to work to better their own lives, and to have a better future for their children,” said Henriguez.

Montreal Nord Solidarité has organized, among other events, seven dinners with youth to talk about crime, expectations, and employment, as well as workshops and shows – including one showcase

of Montreal North youth talent that attracted over 500 people. Some of Solidarité’s projects are funded by the City of Montreal.

“There needs to be teamwork, what happened in Montreal Nord is just a sample of what could happen elsewhere,” Henriguez said.

Gartner also argued for the long-term effects of this sort of commu-nity interaction.

“[While] there’s evidence that [community activities] may not have much effect on crime directly, but they may do so indirectly and in the long term in the extent that they get people in the communities interact-ing with each other more,” she said.

“The more that people in neigh-bourhoods are interacting with each other, the more responsibility they will feel for their community because they will identify with it more. The more they will want to assist people in their communities. And all these things, which don’t seem like crime prevention efforts, in fact do tend to lower crime rates, but in the long run.”

“I think that to base the analysis only on criminality is maybe not the right way. Criminality is a part of it – yes, the city is safer, but at the same time, we need to think: do the people who were susceptible to criminality have a better future right now?” said Henriguez.

According to the Gazette, there were 29 homicides reported on the island in 2008, the lowest numbers since 1972. This drop is relative to 35 homicides in 2005, 42 in 2006, and 41 in 2007. In addition, there were approximately 59 attempted murders in 2008, compared to 99 in 2007 and 136 in 2006. Of the homicides, seven were related to street-gangs, versus 14 in 2007. There were 39 street-gang related attempted murders in 2008 versus 54 in 2007.

Sam NeylonThe McGill Daily

Montreal crime dropsBand-aid solutions don’t address root causes of crime, say critics

OCTOBER 14

Aquil Virani for The McGill Daily

OCTOBER 20

NOVEMBER 29

TO COME

DECEMBER 9

NOVEMBER 28

DECEMBER 3

DECEMBER 2

NOVEMBER 27

DECEMBER 8

DECEMBER 4

DECEMBER 1

NOVEMBER 22

NOVEMBER 30

Last year’s turbulent political circus was topped off with a constitutional crisis in Ottawa, a failed proposal for Liberal-NDP coalition, and the Governor General – a representative of the Queen – proroguing Parliament by request of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. For those of you who were holed up pre-paring for your exams, The Daily gives you its no-nonsense guide to last month’s crisis, as Parliament gets ready to reconvene.

Canada elects a minority Con-servative Government under Harper. Liberals lose 18 seats.

Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion says he will resign once the Liberals choose a replacement.

At an economic forum in Peru, Harper says that deficits are essential, after both he and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said during the election campaign that deficits are undesir-able and damaging.

Flaherty releases a fiscal update which opposition parties criticize for lacking an economic stimulus pack-age, removing the right for public servants to strike until 2011, and trim-ming public financing for opposition parties. All three opposition parties vow to vote against the update.

The Tories remove the party pub-lic financing cuts from the upcoming vote on the fiscal update. The oppo-sition parties respond that they will bring down the government regard-less, and the Liberals say they will use their December 1 opposition day to motion to bring down the Tories and propose a coalition government between the Liberals, NDP, and the Bloc Québécois, with Dion as Prime Minister. The Conservatives shift the opposition day to December 8.

The Tories back down from the anti-strike provision, but the coali-tion possibility remains on the table. Partisans on all sides express outrage, and pundits openly admit they have no idea what will happen next.

Word leaks from several “anony-mous Liberal sources” that Dion’s most likely successor, Michael Ignatieff, is uneasy with the coalition, while the other leading Liberal candi-date, Bob Rae, supports it.

The three opposition leaders sign an accord for a Dion-led Liberal-NDP coalition government until June 2011, with the Bloc promising support in confidence matters until June 2010. The Liberals would get 18 of the 24 cabinet minister posts, while the remaining six to the NDP – their first time in Cabinet.

Governor General Michaëlle Jean cuts short an official visit to Central Europe, announcing she will return to Ottawa the next morning. Rumours circulate that Harper might “prorogue” (i.e. suspend) Parliament to let heads cool, bringing it back in January or later. A full-blown consti-tutional crisis erupts around wheth-er Jean would be forced to follow Harper’s request to suspend or dis-solve Parliament, whether she could ask for a demonstration of confidence in the Government from the House of Commons, and whether she could ignore him and allow the coalition to govern.

After a two-hour conversation, the Governor General agrees to pro-rogue Parliament at Harper’s request, stopping the opposition from bring-ing down the government and mak-ing this 16-day Parliamentary session the sixth-shortest in Canadian his-tory, with the only shorter sessions being held during the two World Wars, the Great Depression, and the Pacific Scandal of 1873.

Canadians rally for and against the proposed coalition, with people demonstrating in the cold, calling radio stations, and organizing on Facebook and blogs to denounce the coalition or explain its necessity. Harper addresses the country on TV at 7 p.m., while Dion’s reply comes nearly half an hour late with the pro-duction values of a webcam, putting a dent in the coalition’s credibility.

Dion resigns for the second time in two months and the Liberal Executive decides it can’t wait until April to select a new leader. At 8 p.m. the polls close in the provincial elec-tion, in which Premier Jean Charest barely grabs a majority after a late surge for the Parti Québécois, many believe due to soft nationalist voters’ anger over separatist Bloc MPs being called “illegitimate” by the Tories and much of English Canada.

Bob Rae is the final Liberal lead-ership candidate to drop out, leaving Michael Ignatieff as the winner by acclamation. Although the opposi-tion leaders keep their mouths tight, most agree that the coalition has lost its opportunity to gain power.

Parliament will be reconvened on January 26, with the budget to be presented the following day. Stay tuned for all the action.

- compiled by Nicholas Smith

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009Commentary

The shifting discourse on Gaza

A cosmic motherly-sounding voice has always told me that even the darkest of clouds

have silver linings. The past two weeks have forced me to now won-der if the same idea of a silver lining applies to clouds of white phospho-rous.

In an arbitrary 15 years from now, the past two weeks (and, unfortu-nately, the remaining time to come) will be remembered with images of disturbing death and injury, reports of complete destruction of an already weakened Gazan infrastructure; thousands of IDPs; an unreachable humanitarian crisis and stories from survivors. Yet there is another mem-ory which may leave an impact on the dynamics of the region and the North American perception on the entire 60-year-old conflict.

Without question, the North American media has often shown sympathy with one side more so than the other – an unfortunate, but natural occurrence. At the same time, however, a digression from such a grievance is vital. The afore-mentioned complaint does not take into consideration the surprising slight shift in the coverage of the war and humanitarian crisis. Oft-repressed opinions and oft-ignored facts are being given the opportunity to be expressed. Fierce criticisms of

Israel and piercing predictions of the ramifications of the war are flooding major newspapers.

Unapologetic opinion pieces about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are being published every day. Aside from asserting truths about the con-flict during an extremely pertinent and bloody time, a common cause cannot be found amongst the authors. The claims of the Israeli government in regards to the operation and the facts about the humanitarian crisis are two points of contention which have been repeatedly brought up. The commentary has also, unsurpris-ingly, treaded outside the proximity of the current conflict. It is extremely hard to discuss this war without con-sidering 60 years of context. And it is this particular tangent which may leave a legacy in popular discourse and thought about the conflict at large in North America – a region in dire need of another perspec-tive. Underdog ideas seeping into the mainstream allow for a slim, but potentially momentous opportunity for the balance to be tipped toward a more equal and fair footing.

The rise of commentaries has also thrown out a rather pathetic and almost saddening punch to Israel’s public relations monopoly. Active writers, in print or online, have rushed to assist in and showcase the

“unravelling” of Israel’s claims of self-defence and cries of moral respon-sibility. Fingers are viciously being thrust toward the direction of the political timing of the war, the Israeli breach of ceasefire; the failures of Israel’s propaganda machine this time around, and the unfathomable denial of the existence of a humani-tarian crisis. Even the International Red Cross, a thoroughly neutral orga-nization, came out with a statement which condemned and criticized Israel for its complete lack of compli-ance (and fatal defiance) of the orga-nization’s attempt to reach injured and starving Gazans.

There generally seems to be an air of exasperation, as though the war has become one of the final pieces in a long and painful Jenga puzzle, with the prophetic early quivering of the tower just beginning. These sighs of being fed-up most poignantly found within the brief titles of the daily commentaries.

American historian Mark LeVine’s seething article “Who Will Save Israel from itself?” featured in Al-Jazeera discusses the gun with which Israel has shot itself in the foot, albeit with an extremely unsatisfactory answer to the title question. Robert Fisk’s repeat-ed commentary in The Independent has asked and answered age old ques-tions from an insightful and firsthand

perspective, in such pieces as “Why do they hate the West so much, we will ask,” and “Why bombing Ashkelon is the most tragic irony.” Gideon Levy’s “The Time of the Righteous” in Haaretz unwaveringly with silent solemn anger lashed out against all supporters of the Israeli so-called “defensive war,” claiming that “anyone who justifies this war also justifies all its crimes.”

The BBC’s Paul Reynolds brought to the public’s attention, early on, the question of Israel’s propaganda in “Propaganda war: trusting what we see?” Khalid Rashidi’s “What you don’t know about Gaza” in The New York Times wrote a quick and to-the-point piece with “a few essential points that seem to be missing from the conversation [in the press] about Israel’s attack...”

Former Israel Defense Force soldier and now Oxford professor Avi Shlaim’s furious article in The Guardian, “How Israel brought Gaza to the brink of humanitarian catastro-phe” labels Israel as a rogue state. Just recently, the Times Online reported that Israeli soldiers coming back from the frontline were revealing the sort of “ruthless tactics against Hamas” being used. One soldier claims that he was shocked to see the neighbourhoods in Gaza as though “we [had been] bombing them for years.” Naomi

Klein also got in on the action when she posted “Israel: Boycott, Divest, Sanction” on her online blog. And the list continues tirelessly.

This proposed shift is not solely about politics, just as the situation in Gaza is not. To approach the conflict as such is to approach it with a nar-row and propaganda-cluttered ideo-logical mind. The Palestinian issue is about a mounting humanitarian crisis which has existed for far longer than 18 days. Our governments (save for the Venezuelans) may not be tak-ing the appropriate action required to address the atrocities being com-mitted by Israel, but challenges to the mainstream discourse through the mainstream discourse allow for the general populace to gain the critical information necessary for change in the policies of our own states toward any country oppress-ing another people. On January 14, the president of the United Nations General Assembly, Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann, described the slaughter of the Palestinians as genocide. The tower begins to sway a bit more.

This is the silver lining in the clouds of white phosphorous over Gaza.

Sana’s column appears every other Thursday. Send Jenga solutions to aristotleslackey@mcgilldaily.com.

Sana Saeed

Aristotle’s Lackey

One of The Daily’s major roles is to depict and analyze power relations and other

issues typically not covered in the mainstream or corporate media. In the last few months, The Daily has reported on many such topics affect-ing the McGill community, but has failed to tie them together adequate-ly and provide a clear and concise analysis.

Last semester, the News section of

The Daily offered its readers a steady and detailed coverage of several McGill-related news items. Two cam-pus unions – representing graduate students (AGSEM) and non-academ-ic staff (MUNACA) – have recently clashed with the McGill administra-tion over wages. A third one, assem-bling undergraduates employed at McGill (AMUSE), seems poised to begin operations soon. The adminis-tration is currently grappling with the

McGill Senate in determining who has authority to ban study-related travel to countries deemed risky. Principal Munroe-Blum recently explained why she thinks deregulating tuition – or in her words, re-regulating it – is a good idea. In addition, one reader recently reminded us how last year the McGill administration closed the Architecture Café, one of the few remaining student-run food services on campus, only to reopen it under the umbrella of McGill Food Services.These events are all symptoms of the fact that McGill is strapped for cash and that the administration is doing everything it can to raise funds and cut costs. But not once, be it an edi-torial or a commentary piece, were these issues properly linked.

It’s not that The Daily has ignored the proverbial elephant – the News section has admirably covered the issues. My concern is that The Daily

resembles the three blind people each describing an isolated part of the other proverbial elephant. I can understand that The Daily did not receive any submissions critically assessing the situation (read my last column for my thoughts on that sub-ject). However, the fact that The Daily has so far failed to critically address the problem is unacceptable.

What The Daily should be doing is exactly what its Statement of Principles mandates: to initiate and provide a forum for discussion. Our University is strapped for cash. What do we think about this? What can we do to counter the problem? More importantly, how can we create dialogue between the various actors involved in order to understand and solve the problem?

The Daily would have benefited from an economics student explain-ing how the monopoly McGill holds

over food services results in a massive transfer of wealth from the student to the University. Similarly, I would have liked to see an analysis by a law stu-dent or professor as to how a lawsuit against McGill could be instigated if a student on a research trip or intern-ship abroad were to be injured or worse and just how expensive that would be for our University. Further, The Daily would have benefited the most from an editorial explaining how all these issues are related and calling on readers to share their thoughts and opinions as to how to address the situation.

The Public Editor serves as the read-ers’ representative. His opinions and conclusions are his own, and his col-umn appears every other Thursday. Send him your thoughts to publiced-itor@mcgilldaily.com.

The Daily must tackle elephant-sized issues

Marc Selles

PublicEditor

Alison Withers / The McGill Daily

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009 7Commentary

Concordia’s Graduate Diploma in Business Administration is for all students wanting to strengthen their undergraduate training with solid business fundamentals. Prior work experience and management tests, such as the GMAT, are not required. No matter your field of study, you’ll have the professional skills to put your vision into motion in less than a year.

Graduate Diploma in Business Administration (GDBA)

Now accepting applications for September, 2009. Visit johnmolson.concordia.ca/gdba to find out more.

You see it. Now be it.

Like any McGill student, I gener-ally like to think I’ve got all the answers – at least in whatever

narrow field of study I have chosen to pursue. As an International Relations minor, I’ve taken no less than seven classes that have mentioned real-ism, idealism, constructivism, and any other “ism” you could possibly imagine. Consequently, I have always felt comfortable identifying myself as a “liberal,” in some contemporary sense of the word.

But I must confess that I’m baf-fled by how we self-proclaimed “liberals” seem to be currently rep-resenting ourselves in the media. In theory, I’m all for a liberal slant in the news, keeping journalistic integ-rity in mind, of course. Lately, how-ever, being a liberal seems to mean picking and choosing. It means deciding when and to whom it is convenient to apply our principles, it means upholding human rights for some while excluding others, and it means valuing one human life above

another. This is not what I signed up for.

Why is it that for nearly a decade, as thousands upon thousands of rockets and missiles have killed and maimed civilians inside Israel, the lib-eral press lay impotent? In the recent wave of conflict, the press has sorely lacked a comprehensive critique of Hamas – a terrorist group which exploits its own civilian population, using them as human shields in order to further their own political aims; a group which plants explosives inside its own schools, booby traps its zoos, and hides in and among families. These all seem fairly consistent with liberal ideals.

I’m confused as to why “our” press has chosen to omit certain facts which seem relevant if we, as progressive, humanistic thinkers, actually claim to cherish life over death. (Which is not the impres-sion I get from Hamas.) We seem to have completely overlooked the fact that in a concerted effort to minimize civilian casualties, the Israeli military has dropped hun-dreds of thousands of pamphlets

into the streets of Gaza, and made tens of thousands of phone calls to civilians in the region, warning them of impending operations and urging them to stay clear of terror-ist enclaves. Nearly 40 Gazan civil-ians, children included, have been transferred into Israel for medical care, but that has also escaped the world’s attention.

Don’t misunderstand me – no crisis is ever black and white. The blame for war is shared by all par-ties involved, and all actors should be held accountable. But perhaps someone can explain to other per-plexed liberals why we are suddenly expected to decry loss of life for only one group, rather than for civilians on both sides of this conflict. I am ashamed, to put it mildly, that my supposedly like-minded brethren have sought to portray the situation in Gaza as so appallingly one-dimen-sional. If this is today’s liberalism, I’d rather be unaffiliated.

Hartlee Zucker is a U2 Humanistic Studies student. You can reach her at hartlee.zucker@mail.mcgill.ca.

HYDE PARK

Many McGill students frown upon Concordia, seeing it less as an institution for

higher learning and more as a quirky school whose ranks teem with activ-ists. McGill students’ attitudes toward Concordia’s radicalism and its stu-dents’ refusal to “fall in line” moti-vates them to label Concordia and its student body as inferior. In reality, however, it is McGill elitists who must battle their inferiority complex.

One issue that McGill sorely lags behind Concordia is environmental sustainability. In 2002, Concordia students initiated the Sustainable Concordia Project, further reveal-ing their passion for action albeit in a more peaceful environmental manner. It took McGill students three years to begin a similar project on campus, and the Sustainability Director position was not even craft-ed until the end of 2007. McGill’s pro-active deficiency is so inherent that commerce majors in the Desautels Faculty of Management are required to take Social Context of Business (SCB), a class that has an indirect goal to educate them on the topic and to motivate the business students into “Taking Action.” Such “behind the curve” behavior might lead one to conclude that McGill attracts more reactionary rather than proactive individuals. However, our experienc-

es in SCB last fall suggests a different source for inaction.

For our SCB project early last September, we aimed to implement a composting system at McGill. In the process of meeting and discussing the matter with Sustainability Director Dennis Fortune, we discovered there already was such a proposal in the pipeline. We were subsequently redirected toward determining the source of post-consumer food waste on campus. Much to our disappoint-ment, this task too had been initi-ated by others in different depart-ments. Unfortunately, administrators failed to inform us of the overlap of intent until too late in the semester for any change to occur. Had we not been tossed back and forth between different administrators who were unaware of the work outside of their immediate departments, the admin-istration might have been able to constructively synthesize students’ energy on a specific issue. It is this type of bureaucratic red tape that fills so many McGill students with chagrin, emasculating their spirit for activism.

McGill’s organizational struc-ture varies greatly from Concordia’s. Their sustainability project takes on a multi-stakeholder approach, where students, faculty, and administra-tors come together in a collabora-tive effort. Advisory committees act as liaisons between the administra-tion and the students leading ini-tiatives. In addition, administrative policy is “open to comments from

the community,” explains Concordia Environmental and R4 Coordinator Louise Hénault-Éthier. “Basically, both grassroots projects and top-down initiatives meet halfway,” while established committee forums pro-vide the necessary channel through which opinions are expressed and acted upon.

The issue, therefore, has now become one of McGill streamlin-ing communication between stu-dents and administrators. But are Concordia’s and McGill’s cultures fundamentally too different for a similar organizational approach to be implemented here? And if so, what values lie at the heart of those two cultures?

Whatever their differences, both universities are educational institu-tions that seek to unlock the con-structive and intellectual capac-ity of students. Before proceeding further with any lofty projects, the McGill community must first address the failure of one of the most basic needs of a active community: com-munication and social interaction. By improving upon those deficien-cies, the University will be on its way to reclaiming its stature as a leading proactive university in Canada.

Melanie Adelson, Christopher Columb, Alexandra Wong, and Benjamin Wong are U3 Management students and love the planet. You can reach them at benjamin.wong2@mail.mcgill.ca.

HYDE PARK

Concordia’s earthly inspiration

How the left lost its edgeHartlee Zucker

Melanie Adelson, Christopher Columb, Alexandra Wong, and Benjamin Wong

Commentary The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 20098

Piñata Diplomacy has again shown itself to be what it is: a brightly-coloured donkey filled

with cheap bits of logic that perpetu-ate opinions found on CNN and FOX News. First, it was Kreitner’s piece on Mumbai tragedy whereby he fell into supporting Bush’s war on terror. Then not surprisingly, his opinion on the recent Gaza incident reeks just the same. From now on, I have com-mitted myself to publicly smash this Piñata every week with all my might and expose what truly lies inside it: dirt! I will start with his latest piece on Gaza.

First, let us put everything into context. Since 1948, the Palestinians have been forcefully driven out of their home. They have been colo-nized in all senses of word. Thus, an oppressed people have the right to resist their occupiers with all means up to an armed struggle. The Palestinians have the right to fight against Israeli imperialism as much as the Americans fought against the British imperialism with guns in the American Revolutionary War more than 200 years ago.

Now, if we start from this premise – that it is the Palestinians who are the oppressed and the Israeli govern-ment who is the oppressor – then we shouldn’t even take the Israeli gov-ernment’s words seriously that they are “defending their citizens,” “fight-ing fundamentalism,” “avoiding civil-ians casualties,” etc. Throughout the history of wars, all aggressors always try to paint themselves as the victims and the victims as the aggressors.

With that being said, with the interest of the genuine liberation of Palestinians in mind, I will have to criticize the indiscriminate rocket method of Hamas (and other indi-vidual terrorism methods which have been used by Hamas, and the PLO in the 1970s), but not from a hypocriti-cal moralistic point of view as the international community has done. I criticize it because this method is not effective and counter-produc-tive. First, it is not even denting the military might of the oppressors. Secondly and most importantly, it

actually pushes the Israeli masses to the hand of the Zionist reaction-aries who are using these attacks as a pretext for their rabid imperialist agenda.

There is a section of Israeli mass-es who are opposed to their imperi-alist government, who are trying to pry away their brothers and sisters from the chauvinist demagogue of their government. The rocket attacks surely are not helping the cause of these anti-war Israelis. In Israel, daily demonstrations against the war have been taking place, a fact that most media and Kreitner fail to mention. Maybe it is because of the “minimal research” Kreitner has done on this topic as he himself admitted. My dad always told me: if you have nothing better to say you should just shut your mouth, or else you will just be spreading ignorance.

The Palestinian masses and the Israeli masses fundamentally have a common enemy: the Israeli impe-rialist government. On one side, it plunges its own people into an unending war on terror designed to subdue any dissent at home, and on the other, it continues to oppress Palestinians after 60 years. Understanding this starting point, we won’t fall into Ricky’s cheap reac-tionary logics. We have to be able to wade through the chauvinist clouds that have been thrown around by the Israeli government (and their friends in Washington, Ottawa, etc.) equally by the fundamentalist Hamas (and Hezbollah, Iranian regime, etc.). Just as much as there are Israelis who are fighting against the imperialist policy of their government, there are Palestinians who are fighting against the growing fundamentalism in their own backyard – if they have one left.

I will state this bluntly: a revolu-tion by the Israeli workers that over-throws the imperialist government of Israel will be required for the solu-tion of the Israel-Palestine problem. The only other alternative is a mutual genocide – take your pick.

Ted Sprague is a Master’s II student in Chemistry. You can reach him at ted_sprague@yahoo.com.

HYDE PARK

Israel’s bombing and occupation of Gaza has dominated the headlines since December 27. What escaped

the headlines and was obscured from the public eye was Israel’s deporta-tion of Richard Falk, the UN Special Rapporteur, appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council, just a week before the bombing started.

The rapporteur recently con-demned Israel for its “flagrant and massive violations of international law,” and the Israeli government claimed that they denied his entry because they disagreed with his appointment and stated that “the mandate of the rapporteur is com-pletely distorted...and directed as a propaganda instrument against Israel.”

To clear things up, the Special Rapporteur’s job is to investigate the condition of human rights in a certain area. As of June 2008, when Richard Falk replaced John Dugard, Falk’s job became just that: to report on the condition of the people of Palestine, and to evaluate to what extent their human rights are being violated. Richard Falk was a good choice for the position, because he would write an objective report on the humani-tarian problems Palestinians are fac-ing, and his Jewish ethnicity would remove the (Isreali) question of racial favouritism.

Israel is, therefore, wrong to accuse Falk of being one-sided and biased, because it is his job to focus only on the humanitarian problems in Palestine. As Falk himself stated in a Democracy Now! interview, Israel’s complaints are clearly “part of a much wider and...insidious pattern of try-ing to shift the attention from their

objections to the person.” Falk calls Israel’s method “politics of opaque-ness;” by focusing on Falk, Israel’s government is “trying to make the realities of the occupation as obscure and as speculative as possible.”

By looking into Richard Falk’s deportation, we can more clearly understand the current situation and Israel’s long-lasting politics of decep-tion. Take Israel’s recent bombing and full-scale invasion of the Gaza strip. They claim that it is justified, because Gaza has been shooting rockets at Israeli land for months, and when the barrage reached a level that was more than a slight irritation they reciprocated. Once again, Israel’s government shifts the attention away from itself to hide its own actions. By focusing the media’s attention on Hamas’ rockets, Israel can hide the fact that they actually provoked Hamas by punishing all Gazans col-lectively during a siege that lasted nearly a year. Israel, by allowing no more than a trickle of supplies to reach Gazans – barely enough to keep people alive – it’s almost as if Israel was waiting for an escalation so that they could be justified in their attack. It is natural for a people occu-pied to strike back at their aggres-sors, be it with ineffective rockets or with symbolic rocks.

Israel’s expulsion of Richard Falk is a prime example of the “opaque-ness” with which they have been fooling the media and their own public for more than 20 years. When Palestinians are the “aggres-sors,” then Israel is legitimized. If Richard Falk’s words are twisted into new meanings, then Israel can justify his expulsion. What matters are the facts that Israel is trying to hide. I do not know the real reason for Falk’s expulsion – only select

Israeli officials know that – perhaps they are afraid of a Jew criticizing Israel, perhaps they did not want a scathing UN report just before their invasion, or maybe they simply did not want a UN Rapporteur to be in danger during the occupation. The question, then, is not whether Israel was justified in attacking Hamas, but whether the international public will be fooled for long.

Israel is like a boy that accuses his schoolmates of doing wrong so that the teacher can see him as angelic in contrast. The public, and most importantly the Israeli public, has to look beyond the benign facade and be aware of Israel’s hidden wrongdo-ings behind every single accusation. The crimes of others (Hamas’s blind violence) should not legitimize their own: the Israeli army has victimized a whole people.

As a last resort, I would like to quote Robert Fisk, the Middle East correspondent of the Independent:

“Have we forgotten the 17,500 dead – almost all civilians, most of them children and women – in Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon; the 1,700 Palestinian civilians dead in the Sabra-Chatila massacre; the 1996 Qana massacre of 106 Lebanese civil-ian refugees, more than half of them children, at a UN base; the massacre of the Marwahin refugees who were ordered from their homes by the Israelis in 2006 then slaughtered by an Israeli helicopter crew; the 1,000 dead of that same 2006 bombard-ment and Lebanese invasion, almost all of them civilians?”

Aaron Vansintjan is a U1 Philosophy student and a Daily production & design editor. Send him your love to avansintjan@gmail.com.

Aaron Vansintjan

COMMENT

Israel’s opaque politicsAnd the expulsion of UN Rapporteur Richard Falk

Ted Sprague

Smashing one piñata at a time

Israel has called the position of Special

Rapporteur “a propa-ganda instrument.”

Aar

on V

ansi

ntja

n /

The

McG

ill D

aily

The Daily has a Public Editor.Marc Selles is your representative, so get in touch and help him critique the paper.

publiceditor@mcgilldaily.com

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009Letters 9

Concerns with pro-private Couillard’s place at McGill

It has come to our attention that McGill has recently cross-appointed Dr. Philippe Couillard to the facul-ties of law and medicine (McGill Reporter, “Philippe Couillard Joins McGill Ranks,” January 8, 2009). This is an issue of significant concern, as Dr. Couillard is currently under active investigation for possible conflicts of interest during the last few months of his term (canoe.ca, “Philippe Couillard sous enquête,” January 9, 2009). The Lobbyists Commissioner, André Côté, has come out and said that he has rea-son to suspect that private health-care industry lobbyists had several illegal contacts with Dr. Couillard prior to his resignation in June 2008. Less than two months after his res-ignation, Dr. Couillard was hired by Persistence Capital Partners, a firm with aspirations of investing in private healthcare in Quebec.

Legal investigations aside, we feel it is unseemly for an academic insti-tution to hire an individual whose political actions contradicted the prevailing evidence-based policy research. The majority opinion and the amalgam of scientific studies in medical and health economic literature support public healthcare as the most equitable, efficient, and cost-effective method of deliver-ing healthcare. Private, for-profit healthcare systems favour the rich over the poor, result in unnec-essary duplication of services, lengthened wait times, inflation-ary salaries and expenses, and the siphoning of patient and taxpayer dollars into private pockets.

McGill is a public university. This appointment sends the wrong message to McGill staff and stu-dents, to its five affiliated teaching hospitals, to its faculties of medi-cine and of law, and to the general population that relies on McGill to provide high quality, equitable, and unbiased health services.

Sincerely,

Adam HofmannMDCM ‘05, Clinical Fellow, McGill Faculty of Medicine

Cory VerbauwhedeLaw ‘06, LL.B./B.C.L., M.A.

What the world doesn’t know about IsraelRe: “Israel’s moral high ground” | Commentary | January 12

How unexpected and refresh-ing, I thought, to see the words “Israel” and “moral” in the same line. It didn’t take long before my contentment faded and I found myself shocked and appalled at the many incorrect, incomplete, and distorted “facts” in this article. This also seems to be the trend in most of the world’s highly “trusted” media such as the BBC, CNN, and even The Globe and Mail. Additionally, the strategy of downplaying one side’s suffering (Israel’s) and using emotional vocabulary and highly graphic descriptions and images (of the Gazans) with the purpose of pulling at the emotional heartstrings of the reader – is one that has no place in respectable journalism.

In this article, the author fails to make mention of the weapon smuggling property of the tunnels (“reduced to smuggling bare neces-sities of food and fuel”). There is also no mention of any humanitarian aid that Israel has indeed offered the Gazans both before and during Israel’s Operation Cast Lead in Gaza. In terms of freedom of movement between Gaza and Israel, the world seems to be unaware of the dozens of cases in which Palestinians took advantage by using health reasons to try to carry out terrorist attacks in Israel. That Israel is targeting bureaucrats, police, rescue workers, and aid convoys is entirely twisted. If the world chooses to call Hamas terrorist leaders “bureaucrats” or the terrorists “police” then yes,

Everybody, just quit it alreadyRe: “I’m so over it, really” | Commentary | December 1

Lisa Miatello is so right. We should immediately stop under-taking studies that risk produc-ing results she disagrees with.

Mookie KideckelU1 Political Science

It’s a partly Daily par-tayRe: “MUNACA, McGill prepare for strike” | News | January 12

So I was reading through the lat-est edition of The Daily and marvel-ling at how even with the current brouhaha about your journalistic objectivity, you still managed to publish a fairly non-combative and dry interview with our esteemed HMB. I then turned the page to read the also seemingly non-combative and dry piece on the current fail-ing negotiations between MUNACA and the administration and saw this sentence: “Currently, MUNACA is requesting ten per cent over three years...while McGill is presently offering a paltry 8.5 per cent.”

“Paltry?” Seriously? The Daily’s pledge to represent alternative viewpoints has led to some fascinat-ing insights you wouldn’t find in the other journalistic outlets at the school – although I do occasion-ally enjoy the nearly Baghdad Bob level of optimism about McGill that The McGill Reporter provides. The problem is just that even if it is a deserved sentiment about McGill’s offer, to use such a blatantly loaded and unnecessary term is so beyond the pale of respectable journalism it seems bizarre to let it go to print. Surprisingly enough, I know next to nothing about pay scale increases of university-based unions in Quebec. I have no idea whether 8.5 per cent over three years is paltry, enormous, overdue, undeserved, or some combination of the pre-ceding. The only evidence given in support of the school’s stinginess is a vague statement made by a MUNACA member about a “similar” Concordia union getting 20 per cent over four years. Is that below average? Above average? I can’t know, because you didn’t tell me.

I realize that I might come off a bit like a bitter old man, writing angry letters to the paper about the usage of a single word in an article on page five of the paper, but little things do make a difference. Please, please limit the application of your principles to the objects and subjects of your coverage and try to avoid gratuitous digs at the “authorities.” It just reinforces all the negative stereotypes about your paper and makes an interest-ing article seem, well, paltry.

Alex SilverU2 Psychology

Jews, Muslims, and Arabs should stand togetherRe: “Tadamon! is no paragon” | Commentary | January 12

I was surprised to see that I had become Blinkovitz on page 12 of the recent issue. Then I realized the extra “l” had just wandered over there from the “athough” in the first line on page 19. Aside from pointing out this sadly displaced letter, I do have a few thoughts about the topics covered by Kreitner, Abukhdeir, and Kideckel in their neighbouring articles.

I am sad to see the degree to which discussion over the war in Gaza is polarized. I both agree and disagree with aspects of all three articles. But I’ll try to reduce the level of detail to save space. Rather than try to explain all the reasons why I oppose Hamas, oppose the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) bomb-ing and invasion of Gaza, and oppose both CUPE’s and Tadamon!’s (with QPIRG funding) proposed boycott of Israeli academics, I will instead raise an often undiscussed outcome of this conflict and the interna-tional reactions to it: heightened ethnic tensions for diasporic Jewish, Muslim, and Arab communities.

I implore all those engaged in protests or other forms of advocacy to take special care to avoid dehu-manizing, stereotyping, or otherwise denigrating innocent civilians and their diasporic counterparts. Though I agree with many of the points made by those protesting against Israel, I am concerned by the acts of intimidation and vandalism that have been directed against diaspora Jews in Paris, Chicago, Strasbourg, and many other cities. I am concerned that rising economic unease will play into the hands of hateful racists.

The characterizations we Jews, Muslims, and Arabs create of one another can very easily be rede-ployed by racists (of all political per-suasions) against all of us. Though we may try to emphasize our differ-ences from one another, a caricature of a Jew and a caricature of an Arab look about the same to Joe Schmo, who may well say, “fuck ‘em all.” As absolutely miniscule minorities in countries like Canada we must at the end of the day be able to stand together against racism in all its forms, especially as we head toward what may be a very tumultuous era.

Isaac BinkovitzU3 Geography (Urban Systems)

Please send your letters from your McGill account to letters@mcgilldaily.com, and try to keep them to about 300 words. The Daily does not print let-ters that are sexist, racist, homophobic, or otherwise hateful. If you don’t think 300 words can contain your thoughts, write to commentary@mcgilldaily.com about writing a Hyde Park. The Daily received more letters than it could print in this issue. They will appear in the next issue (Thursday, January 22).

Israel is targeting them. But the unfortunate deaths of rescue work-ers and aid convoys have in no way been the intention of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The deaths of innocent civilians seeking shelter in the UN-run school is also tragic, however, the world fails to recognize that, once again, Hamas strategically hid among them with the expecta-tion of IDF fire, and consequently innocent deaths that would lead to strong international condemnation.

Every country has an explicit obligation to do the utmost in protecting its citizens – and Israel is currently practising what most countries claim to preach. The IDF, unlike Gaza’s Hamas terror-ists, make every effort to target the threat and warn and protect innocent civilians prior to action. It is Hamas, not Israel, who is respon-sible for the deplorable conditions in Gaza where they store weapons among innocent Gazans, and use women and children as human shields. Let the world not forget that Hamas refuses Israel’s right to exist and to cease terror attacks (including suicide bombings and shootings within Israel, in addition to constant daily Kassam rocket fire from Gaza into Southern Israel that are now within the reach of over one million Israelis). Both Israelis and innocent Palestinians are the victims of Hamas – and until ter-rorism stops, Israel will continue to fight for its right to live in peace and quiet, with the same morals as any other Western democracy.

Eden Sagman U3 Management and Political Science

Please limit the application of your principles to the objects and subjects of your

coverage and try to avoid gratuitous digs at the “authorities.” It just reinforces all the

negative stereotypes about your paper and makes an interesting article seem, well, paltry.

Alex Silver “It’s a partly Daily par-tay”

Re: “MUNACA, McGill prepare for strike” | News | January 12

Ben

Pec

k /

The

McG

ill D

aily

Features10

W hen Barack Obama won the presi-dential election, Hamas immedi-ately sent a letter of congratulations

to the President-elect. In an interview with Britain’s Sky News, Hamas politiburo leader Khalid Mishal said that he was willing to hold talks with the new President, and that he hoped that Obama would reciprocate. “Yes we are ready for dialogue with President Obama and with the new American administration with an open mind, on the basis that the American administration respects our rights,” he said. He added that sitting down with Hamas would be the new administration’s only option if it is seri-ous about bringing about a lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian quagmire.

One of very few events that took place while I was living in Ramallah last year that seemed to give Palestinians some hope that a just solu-tion to the conflict may one day come about occurred in mid-April, when former-U.S. presi-dent Jimmy Carter flew to Damascus and met with Mishal, as well as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert refused to meet with Carter during his trip to the region; his official explanation was that he did not want to be perceived as holding indi-rect negotiations with Hamas.

Appeals for peace When I went to cover the student elections

at Birzeit University that month, I spoke to a member of the Hamas-aligned Wafaa Party. It was one of few opportunities I had to talk with a member of Hamas while I was there, as the group has been forced underground in the West Bank since June 2007. About a month prior, “GKMH” had been released after four years in Israeli prison. He had been arrested when he tried to cross the separation wall to help release a friend from an Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) security compound.

“For any solution to come about, Hamas must be talked to,” he told me. “Whether it is negotiated by Carter, or Egypt, or the French, the conflict will not end until Hamas is approached.”

Carter’s visit came at a time of sporadic fight-ing and rocket attacks around Gaza between the IDF and Hamas, and he recommended that the latter undertake a unilateral cease-fire. The day following the meeting, Mishal pub-licly announced that Hamas would be willing to settle for a two-state solution. “We agree to a [Palestinian] state on pre-67 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital with genuine sovereign-ty without settlements but without recognizing Israel,” he was quoted as saying in Ha’aretz.

Two weeks after Carter’s visit, 11 other Palestinian factions present in the Gaza Strip – including the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and Islamic Jihad – joined Hamas

in its proposal for a halt to rocket attacks on Israel. But the proposal was immediately shot down by Israel. The spokesperson for the Prime Minister’s office, Mark Regev, told Al-Jazeera that the abatement of illicit arms smuggling across the Gaza-Egypt border was a precondi-tion for the IDF to halt its ongoing bombard-ment of the Strip. That any Israeli politician, fol-lowing Israel’s 2005 pullout from Gaza, would have the gumption to be legislating arms con-trol there isn’t surprising; the degree to which Israel’s ongoing blockade has brought the Strip to its knees explains why some Israeli politi-cians might think they have the prerogative to dictate Palestinian domestic policy.

The siegeAfter Hamas won the Palestinian Legislative

Council elections by a landslide in January 2006, Israel did everything in its power to undermine the new government. In late June that year, the IDF moved into Ramallah and arrested one third of cabinet members and 23 Hamas legislators, reinstalling Fatah as leader of the Palestinian Authority.

Israel’s siege began when Hamas took con-trol of Gaza a year later. The humanitarian situ-ation there has since reached levels more dire than any seen in the region’s entire recorded history – barring, maybe, 1948.

Gaza is one of the most densely populated places in the world. One-and-a-half-million people live there, 70 per cent of whom are refu-gees or descendents of refugees. There is not nearly enough arable land for the region to be self-sufficient, nor is there adequate access to water and irrigation, and Gaza’s strawberry and carnation crops have frequently been barred from export. In the past 18 months, its residents have resorted to digging tunnels into Sinai and smuggling Egyptian goods across the border.

Israel has largely blocked the entry of fuel. As a result, car and ambulance use has been limited, and the only power plant in the Strip is frequently forced to shut down.

Prior to this current spate of hostilities, the UN reported that tens of thousands have extremely limited access to water, and more than half of Gazan children were undernour-ished. For months it’s been reported that some people have been scrounging in dumpsters for scraps of food.

This policy is what Dov Weisglass, a top adviser to Olmert, described in 2006 as put-ting Gazans “on a diet;” I would call it collective punishment and a war crime.

To bomb or not to bombWhatever talks led to the six-month cease-

fire – which was brokered by Egypt and expired three weeks ago – they were done as covertly as the Israeli government could possibly man-

Hamas must be talked toNiko Block weighs in on Israel’s repeat-ed refusal to negotiate openly with the Palestinian authority

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2008 11

Evan Newton / The McGill Daily

age. The reason for this is that negotiating with Hamas is more unpopular with Israelis than the sort of conflict we’ve seen these past two and a half weeks. With Israeli elections set to be held next month, the ruling Kadima party and its rival Likud, led by former prime minis-ter Benjamin Netanyahu have both been jock-eying for the support of an Israeli public that has increasingly supported a hard line policy toward Hamas.

Ten days after Operation Cast Lead began, Olmert told Ha’aretz that he was speaking with several international leaders to work toward a “diplomatic solution” to the crisis. The same day Tzipi Livni, Israel’s Foreign Minister and incoming leader of the ruling Kadima party, turned down an offer by Russia to relay mes-sages to Hamas by saying, “We have nothing to discuss with Hamas.” The contradiction points to a chronic pattern in Israel’s policy toward Hamas: bomb or don’t bomb, but never dis-cuss.

Israel’s refusal to negotiate has prevailed too in its relationship with the Syrian govern-ment, which has offered on numerous occa-sions to rescind its military support of both Hezbollah and Hamas in return for the Golan Heights, which Israel seized and has contin-ued to occupy since 1967. Although Olmert has insinuated that opening talks with Syria would be in Israel’s interest, Hamas does not believe he has the power in the Knesset, nor the popular support, to pull off such a move. As with Hamas, Syria’s appeals have been vir-tually ignored.

Closed doorsLike most people, I do not condone the tar-

geting of civilians under any circumstance. Nor do I believe that attacking civilian targets is strategically wise. With the Obama administra-tion preparing to take the helm in Washington, Hamas’s rocket attacks on southern Israel have been playing into its characterisation as a group of psychopathic Islamist vigilantes in the right-wing American press, and as a result its chances of meeting with the new American government are much slimmer now. Hilary Clinton’s comments Wednesday, that the new administration will not speak with Hamas, indicate that Hamas may have already squan-dered any opportunity for dialogue with the States.

Even though, as an occupying force in the West Bank, the IDF is a legitimate target under international law, I have and will continue to support the non-violent strains of the intifada, which are very prevalent amongst Palestinians there and deserve far more attention than

they have been given by the international press.

But Gazans do not have the same means of civil disobedience against Israel as West Bank Palestinians; nor is the West Bank fac-ing a humanitarian crisis of the scale that Gazans have experienced in the past year and a half. Save for the United Nations, which has continued to report on the crisis and provide humanitarian aid, Gazans have no friends in the international community, and thus little to no recourse to their suffering.

Hamas’s track record suggests that the recent resumption of violence is largely a result of the fact that Hamas has found nothing but closed doors in the diplomatic sphere – in its relationship with other countries too, but espe-cially with Israel. Having exhausted all of their available options, I am left wondering what other means they have of bringing the world’s attention to their plight.

What happened on January 10 was typi-cal of the conflict. Both sides rejected a UN cease-fire proposal, which called for a halt to arms smuggling from Egypt and for an “unim-peded provision” of aid to the people of Gaza. Israel ignored the truce on the grounds that its “objectives” had not yet been achieved; Hamas on the grounds that it had not been consulted. While far from being a prudent, or moral, move on Hamas’s part, the failure of the UN’s pro-posal underscores the necessity for open dia-logue with the de facto government in Gaza.

Hamas knows it can’t beat Israel militar-ily. With Gaza being the tiny enclave that it is (about 25 per cent smaller than the Island of Montreal), Hamas doesn’t stand a chance of rebuffing the IDF as Hezbollah did in the sum-mer of 2006.

Of the 1,000 deaths recorded by January 14, 40 per cent have been women or children under 18. Roughly 300 of them were militants, according to the IDF. Of the 4,250 Gazans that have been injured, roughly half were women or children. By contrast, 13 Israelis have been killed, of whom ten were soldiers, (and four of those died as a result of friendly fire).

Israel has maintained its absurd line that it is carrying out the operation to destroy Hamas’s ability to attack Israel’s border towns, and has expressed that it has no intention of reoccupying the Strip. Despite Israel’s military

might, Hamas has somewhere between ten and 20,000 trained fighters in the Strip and an operation to overthrow Hamas altogether would come at an extremely high cost.

And yet, Israel would lose nothing by lifting the siege.

The question of proportionalityAll this leads us to the inevitable question

as to what Israel thinks it will get out of its indiscriminate assault on the Strip – the lev-elling of schools which had served as refuge to dozens of civilians, the bombing of apart-ment buildings and other non-military targets. In essence, it is the same question that I was hoping my Israeli family might answer for me while I was there, although my patience for their bullheaded racism eventually ran out.

It’s the same question that Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Dan Gillerman, faced during the 2006 war in Lebanon; his answer, though disturbing and unsatisfactory, is prob-ably as good as any other. The IDF was in the process of killing 1,100 Lebanese civilians after Hezbollah had kidnapped three soldiers and kidnapped two others, and with charges that Israel was perpetrating a grossly dispropor-tionate counter-offensive coming from virtual-ly every country on the globe, what Gillerman said was, “You’re damn right we are.”

Niko Block is a U1 Economics student. Another version of this article was origi-nally published on his blog, nikonavi.blogspot.com, January 12.

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009Mind&Body

How to make breakfast for champions

African-American men are more likely than men of any other racial category to develop and

die of prostate cancer. A recent study suggests that a lack of screening may be to blame.

According to the study “Sexual Orientation and Testing for Prostate and Colorectal Cancers among Men in California,” published in the December 2008 issue of Medical Care, bisexual and gay African-American men are the cohort least likely to be screened for prostate cancer.

This study, lead by Kevin C. Heslin, an assistant professor at Charles Drew University, was based upon data from

19,410 men who self-identified as gay or bisexual in the California Health Interview Survey. The Survey was conducted through direct telephone interviews of a representative sample of men over 50 years of age – the age at which the majority of healthcare institutions suggest that men begin to undergo regular screenings for both prostate and colorectal cancer.

The data examined revealed that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screenings were done 12 per cent to 14 per cent less often on gay and bisexual African-American men when compared to heterosexual African-American men, and 15 per cent to 28 per cent less oftern when compared to gay and bisexual Caucasian men. The study also found that African-American men on the whole are less likely to be screened than Caucasian

or Latino men, regardless of sexual preferences.

“For blacks, being a member of both racial and sexual minority

groups represents a kind of double jeopardy when it comes to get-ting PSA testing,” Heslin said in a

December 2008 news release.Despite this study’s findings, over-

all, gay and bisexual men are more likely than heterosexuals to receive

regular screenings for colorectal of cancer. This may be due to the fact that gay and bisexual men tend to

be more conscious of the need for screening revolving around sexual health, researchers say.

Prostate cancer is the second largest killer of men in the United States, and early access to PSA testing is impera-tive for its prevention or detection and treatment. However, the results of the California colorectal screening study reveal the discrepancies in access to public health services for minority or marginalized populations.

The conclusion of the California study is aimed at making the statis-tics more than just numbers. The study includes the recommendation that those responsible for health ser-vice planning take race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation into account when developing screening programs, especially those programs aimed at high-risk populations.

Emma GrayMind&Body writer

with foodFriends

Sophie Busby & Olivia Hoffmeyer

What: The frittata (tatata).

How much: $2.59 for a carton of large eggs, plus whatever fillings you want.

Why: Because the most important meal of the day should last all day.

It’s the beginning of a new semester and a new year, so start the day off right with breakfast! Omlettes are so 2008, so impress the brunch crowd with a frittata. Not only is frittata a fun word to say, it’s also versatile – cut it in fancy shapes for snacks or big slices for breakfast. My favourite thing about this Italian omelette is that even though the preparation can be a bit tricky, if you mess up, just stir it around in the pan and voila: scrambled eggs!

The recipe that follows is great for a big pan, a lot of friends, or leftovers. If you just want to whip up an intimate breakfast for a few (or two) just divide it in half and use a smaller pan.

Tips and Tricks:

The broiler is your new best friend: finishing the frittata under the broil-er will give it a perfect fluffy consistency with a golden crust on the surface. But be careful! If your pan has a plastic handle it will melt in the oven. You can avoid this by leaving the oven door open while you broil the frit-tata making sure that the handle of the pan in sticking out of the oven. Or you can even hold the pan under the heat (wearing oven mitts, of course). Besides, recipes that call for the broiler often recommend leaving the oven door open.

As for serving your tatata, diamond shapes are a very classy way to present this dish if you want to give it some extra pizzazz.

Can’t get enough tatata? More recipes and blog action from FWF will be com-ing at you every other Thursday this semester, so gear up that broiler!

Fritatta (tatata)

• 10 large eggs

• 3 tbs milk

• 1 tbs olive oil

• salt and pepper to taste

Decide what combination of fillings you want. The classic green onions, ham, and cheese or the Sunday morning brunch fridge clean out (throw anything that needs to be used up into the mix) are both great options. One of our favourite combinations is any green veggie (spinach, broccoli, etc.) and any cheese (feta, chedder, etc.).

Cut the fillings you decide on into small, bite-sized pieces. Heat the oil in a large pan on medium-high. Crack the eggs into a bowl and whisk with a fork until they are mixed well. Stir in the milk, fillings, salt, and pepper. Now for the most important step: test the oil. The eggs won’t cook right if it isn’t hot enough, so drop a bit of egg or water into the heated pan to test it. It should sizzle; if it doesn’t, wait.

When the oil is ready, pour in the egg mixture. Swirl it around to evenly coat the pan and let the egg solidify on the bottom. When you can lift the edges

of the egg from the pan, run a spatula along the rim of the eggs. Now pull the egg gently away from the pan at one edge and let the uncooked egg run under the edge. The idea is that you always want a cooked surface on the bottom of the pan that you can lift to let the liquid eggs run underneath to cook the frit-tata in layers. Continue to do this while occasionally swirling and tilting the pan for the first few minutes of cooking.

Preheat the broiler of your oven.Turn the heat to low, shake the pan to prevent

sticking, cover, and cook for about five minutes or until the top is no longer runny. Make sure the bot-tom doesn’t burn by loosening it with a spatula or jerking the pan around.

To seal the deal, take the pan off the stove-top and put it under the broiler for a few minutes. Watch it very carefully so it doesn’t burn, but let it get to a nice golden brown colour. It should puff nicely.

Shake the pan around a bit to make sure the egg didn’t stick to the bottom during cooking and let it cool for at least five minutes before removing it from the pan and serving.

Serve hot or cold!

“For blacks, being a member of both racial and sexual minor-ity groups represent a kind of

double jeopardy when it comes to getting PSA testing.”

Kevin C. Heslin Assistant professor, Charles Drew University

Study finds racial inequalities in cancer screeningGay and bisexual African-American men are least likely to be screened for colorectal and prostate cancer

Sal

ly L

in /

The

McG

ill D

aily

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009 13Mind&Body

Have you had a “LAZY EYE” since childhood? McGill Vision Research is looking for study participants. Please call Dr. Davar Nikneshan at 514-934-1934 ext. 35307 or email mcgillvisionresearch@gmail.com

for further information.

Master school of BartendingBartending and table service courses

Student rebateJob reference service

• 514-849-2828www.Bartend.ca

(on line registration possible)

Employment

Movers / Storage

ANBER MOVERSMoving / Storage. Closed van or trucks. Local + Long distance. OTT-TOR-NY-BOSTON-FLA. Low Rates

Steve • (514) 735-8148

Bilingual Industrial Engineer, student part-time to work from home. Interesting work filing “Invention Patents” & communicating with interesting companies with interesting products. Can lead to junior partnership with a start-up organisation. Contact inventor directly for further details,

514-351-5859

ClassifiedsTo place an ad,via email: ads@dailypublications.orgphone: 514-398-6790fax: 514-398-8318

Cost:McGill Students & Staff: $6,70/day; $6.20/day for 3 or more days. General public: $8.10/day; $6.95/day for 3 or more days. 150 character limit. There will be a $6.00 charge per contract for any characters over the limit. Prices include taxes. MINIMUM ORDER $40.50/ 5 ads.

Housing

aPartMents for rent

Brooklyn-Belle ÉPoQUeMcGill ghetto

RENOVATED apartment to rent, fridge & oven.(514) 499-3455www.cogir.net

Lessons / Courses

BELLYDANCE WITH VENUSClasses start Jan. 15. Studio Bizz. 15% off for McGill

students. venusbellydance.com 514-288-4989

Question: If a vibrator is to women’s sexual liberation as Gandhi is to India, what then is a sex doll to

male sexuality?A division exists between the way we

view women’s masturbatory sex toys and men’s. A woman with a vibrator or a dildo is “sexually emancipated;” a man who needs more than a dirty photograph and his hand to jerk off, however, is often seen to be fall-ing short of an Alfie-style masculinity.

Blowjob imitators, fake vaginas, the fleshlight, and sex dolls are all objects of ridicule. Weird and creepy pervs have them; real men don’t. Men who resort to artificial implements for sex just don’t seem to have that natural magnetic masculine sexual energy the likes of James Bond. Or maybe they just don’t buy Axe deodorant.

A lot of this has to do with the way masculine sexuality is constructed in mainstream society – as insatiable and uncomplicated, needing only a hole and some lube to get off. Society does not think men require an emotional connec-tion. Emotion? Pfft, that shit’s for women, alright?

This view is reinforced in all sorts of silly ways in society, porn being one of the main playas. For example, porn, marketed to men, focuses mainly on fucking and usu-ally ends in more fucking. Erotica, on the other hand, which is marketed to women, generally focuses on relationships and ends in marriage. If men are taking their sexual cues from porn, then intimacy and sex don’t belong in the same bedroom. Intimacy is for girly girls; straight-up sex is for manly men.

Feminist arguments aside, if a blow-up doll is being used simply as a fuck toy, why do some think it’s so much creepier than a dildo, which basically reduces men to a cock? The fact is that owners of sex dolls often aren’t just using their lovely ladies for sex; many form intimate relations with them. This is much more problematic from the mainstream masculine point of view. Lars and the Real Girl, starring Ryan Gosling, is the story of a lonely man, his sex doll, and his emotional attachment to the intimate object. In the movie, Lars and his doll never consummate their relation-ship, but Lars still grows emotionally close to her. It’s supposed to be a heart warming story, yet Lars and the Real Girl parodies a real-life phenomenon where men do grow attached to their sex dolls, where they give them names, call them their girlfriend, and

keep a picture of “her” in their wallet. RealDoll is a California based company

that manufactures life-sized, realistic look-ing sex dolls that are made out of silicone and come with a US$ 6,500 price tag. From RealDoll’s web site, a client may choose their doll’s hair style, breast size, pubic hair, makeup, and skin tone. The skin tones range from “fair” to “Light African.” Only “eth-nic” tones like “Asian” are labeled by their nationality – Dark African or, say, South-East Asian are notable omissions. The FAQ on the site has tips for maintenance and care of the dolls, such as the proper way to brush and style the doll’s hair, how to pro-tect their fingers, what makeup best suits the doll, and if it can be posed for doggy style. Apparently, just like children’s dolls, sex dolls require some tender loving care and affection.

Obviously, the sex doll is disturbing when being viewed from a feminist per-spective, whether or not they’re being used as a substitute girlfriend. These arguments aren’t hard to draw out. Wait, your ideal woman is one you created yourself? Who has no opinion and never talks back? Who has a personality you not only created but also control? This is all not to mention the Barbie-like pro-portions of the doll (Barbie herself was originally created as a German sex doll, and in RealDolls her legacy seems to have come full circle), and the binary assumptions of gender and sex inherent in RealDolls. Did I mention that their male doll is out of production? RealDolls does offer a penis attachment for female dolls, but they problematically dub dolls with this addition “She-Male Dolls.” To me, this seems more like trans-fetishism than a queer-friendly option. The point is that all the aforementioned concerns are valid, and in this light, intimate rela-tions with sex dolls are decidedly creepy.

But let’s put those thoughts aside for a moment and think about men cuddling their RealDolls in bed. There is no doubt that RealDolls, with their hairless bodies, vacant expressions, and open suggestive pumped-up lips mirror the female body emulated by the mainstream porn industry. However, the relationships many men cul-tivate with their RealDoll do not. As stated before, masculine sexuality is supposed to be about fucking, not cuddling. Yet men who love their dolls, self-titled “iDollators,” are not only bringing intimacy into porn on their own terms, but are also performing

supposed acts of femininity – dressing their dolls, styling their hair, and doing their makeup. On one level this operates as the ultimate heterosexual male fantasy, where-in men have complete control over women. In doll world, women aren’t just objectified, they are objects. Yet this hyper-heterosexu-al fantasy is undercut by the erotic intimacy necessary to maintaining such a relation-ship. These acts are performed out of a strange sort of love for their doll. It seems that the men who love their dolls find that a wet hole isn’t enough to get them off, which leads them to give a personality to their sex toy.

What sort of culture do we live in where some men seek intimacy from dolls as opposed to people? Often in popular cul-ture, women are seen as domesticating forces, attempting to marry and settle the Eternal Bachelor character. The “iDolla-tors” narrative counteracts this; here men are domesticating themselves. As creeped out as I am by RealDolls (just looking at the site totally gives me the heebee jee-bees), I think the phenomenon has some interesting implications. Just as vibrators have become symbols of women’s libera-tion, perhaps, by some twisted sense of logic, RealDolls are being used to liber-ate straight guys from the constraints of classical masculine sexuality, giving them a foothold on sexual intimacy. Maybe it’s even something along the lines of a good thing?

Guys and dollsA look at men’s intimate sexual relations with their dolls

Julie Alsop

Guttural mind

Sex,Drugs,Cocoa

PuffsExplore your passions.Write for Mind & Body.

E-mail mindnbody@mcgilldaily.com for

more information.Evan Newton / The McGill Daily

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009Culture

Courtesy of Rachel Granofsky

Have you ever wanted to scale the side of a building with a rope ladder? Ever wished

that sheep were being used to trim the lawns on campus, instead of gas-powered mowing machines? Can you envision walking down a city sidewalk knowing that the compres-sion caused by your bodyweight was producing electrical energy? These ideas may seem implausible, but in fact they aren’t; each of them has been successfully realized and, along with 96 other creative initiatives, they are being featured as part of “Actions: What You Can Do With the City,” the latest exhibit at Montreal’s Canadian Centre for Architecture. The exhibi-tion, which gathers together the work of 99 innovative architects, artists, and urban planners, aims to challenge the way that ordinary people interact with the cities in which they live.

In putting together “Actions,” co-curators Mirko Zardini and Giovanna Borasi were focused on re-examining seemingly mundane activities like walking, playing, recycling, and gar-

dening, and investigating possible links between these everyday acts and bigger issues. “Even if these actions are not now considered to be struc-tural ones in planning and managing our cities,” Borasi says, “they could [provide] a different way to look at and tackle common urban problems such as pollution, traffic, food securi-ty, waste management, employment, and the tensions between a city’s dif-ferent inhabitants. I feel that looking at these issues from a different angle will allow new, different, and unex-pected answers to emerge.”

Thus, the exhibit features projects and experiments that take a range of approaches to rethinking the mod-ern city, from using parkour for the re-appropriation of abandoned build-ings to guerilla gardening techniques that can transform concrete lots into vegetable gardens. There is also room for the whimsical and outlandish, like the inflatable pink rubber structures that transformed a German field into a temporary playground and meeting place in 2004, or a Vancouver-based design firm’s “suspend pants,” which are fitted with high-tension cords, metal clips, and a reinforced seat, allowing nearly any surface to be

transformed into a space for people to swing. “Our intention was to give a new picture of urban phenomena, things that are going on in our cities, and the new needs of our society; we wanted to inspire in designers, archi-tects, planners, and city managers a different way of looking at our built environment,” Borasi explains.

Indeed, the exhibition is grounded in all of the contributors’ individual critiques of entrenched urban pat-terns of production and consumption. Though their methods and approach-es vary, the artists featured are con-nected by the common belief that suc-cessful civic planning can be a grass-roots effort. Borasi notes that all the projects were accomplished “without a huge budget or a complicated pro-cess.” She adds that one of the exhib-it’s goals was to “focus on something that the public could see and relate to with a certain immediacy.”

The exhibition’s dynamic title sug-gests the importance that is placed on taking an active stance in changing the way society conceives of public space. It is also fitting that the exhi-bition’s curators established a web site to accompany the project: cca-actions.org. The site not only provides

short descriptions of all the contribu-tors’ actions, but also features a virtual forum where members of the general public can submit their own under-takings and discuss concepts and projects. Borasi is excited about “the idea that people could start tomor-row to do something similar” to what they’re seeing in exhibition. One of her favourite actions exemplifies this concept: “Oranges Lead Nocturnal Walk,” by Los Angeles-based foraging group Fallen Fruit. “They organize public night walks around the city of Los Angeles to harvest fruit from trees with branches growing over fences or across property lines into the public domain,” Borasi explains. “It is a very simple idea that introduces a new way of treating public and private space, while recuperating food that other-wise would be wasted.” That’s the “Actions” exhibit in a nutshell: a gath-ering of creative and effective ideas that brings people together to reclaim their urban environment.

Amelia SchonbeckThe McGill Daily

The CCA (1920 Baile, Metro Guy-Concordia) hosts “Actions” through April 19. For a schedule of the exhi-bition’s accompanying lecture and film series, visit cca.qc.ca.

Rethinking the city, from the ground upActions exhibit presents fantastic yet feasible solutions for the urban landscape

Critics have received Montreal writer Rawi Hage’s new book, Cockroach, with open arms,

hailing it as a compelling new exis-tentialist novel. But don’t let the label and praise intimidate you – you can still enjoy yourself while you read it.

Growing up in Beirut, Lebanon, Hage endured nine years of civil war. During this time he was exposed to violence and the strain on sanity that comes with an impossibly compli-cated political situation. The reader can clearly see that the violence and thuggery that the author was exposed to from a young age acutely affected him.

Hage’s characters always seem to be hiding something sinister, in a way that makes the reader ques-tion their mental stability. It is hard to know what will happen next, how each character will react to each new event. This style is present in Cockroach as well as Hage’s first novel, De Niro’s Game, which was published in 2006 and won a num-ber of awards, including the IMPAC Dublin Literary Award. De Niro’s Game took place in Beirut during the civil war of the 1970s and fol-lowed the life of a young man named Bassam, who is not so unlike the narrator of Cockroach.

Cockroach takes place in Montreal’s immigrant community. We never know for sure where the narrator is from (or even what his name is); he spends time with Iranian immigrants and refugees, but makes it a point that he is not one of them. He is free to casually talk to a profes-sor from Algeria about welfare, chat with a cab driver who once published a magazine in Iran, and wander up

and down St. Laurent on the days when he isn’t working as a bus boy at a local Iranian restaurant. The nar-rator lives in an apartment building where he smells the strong spices of the Pakistani family below and drinks tea with the Russian lady in the base-ment apartment.

The plot follows the narrator as he grapples with the cold Montreal winter. The most urgent events in his life include collecting money that his friends owe him, meeting with the woman he claims to love, and break-ing into strangers’ houses. However, the majority of his time is spent wan-dering the streets of Montreal, con-templating life, and imagining that he is half human and half cockroach. This bizarre concept, evocative of Kafka’s Metamorphosis, begins to make sense as the narrator slowly reveals information about himself and the life that he lived before it was committed to the page.

Among other things, we learn about an unsuccessful suicide attempt in his recent past: he tried to hang himself from a tree in Mount Royal Park. This action was not about death or trying to end life, but curi-osity about what it would be like to escape the light. His attempted sui-cide results in mandatory weekly therapy sessions, leading to an inter-esting relationship between the nar-rator and his therapist.

The whole book takes place in a state of delirium. This could be credited to the narrator’s occasional substance abuse, but the end result is a foggy style of narration that some-how reaches moments of lucidity. It tells the truth as the narrator sees it, but the reader must decide what is real.

That Hage is Canadian and chooses Montreal as the setting for his novel makes Cockroach relevant

to readers who can recognize the city’s landmarks and frigid weather. Although the novel has a distinctly Canadian setting, it is an example of a Canadian novel that branches off from traditional Canadiana in its style and subject matter. Hage is proof that exciting [and unusual] things can happen in the Canadian liter-

ary world. In his acknowledgements, Hage thanks the Canada Council for the Arts and the Conseil des arts et des lettres du Québec. The contribu-tions of institutions such as Canada Council have made it possible for books to be written and art created that may never have had a chance.

Don’t be afraid to imagine what it

would be like to travel the streets of Montreal in the dark winter while you stay warm indoors, or to imagine the world from a cockroach’s perspec-tive. The idea is strange and a little terrifying at first, but this book tells a beautiful story told from a unique point of view in words that glide eas-ily across the page.

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009 15Culture

Searching seemed to be the theme at last year’s Governor General Awards, Canada’s most

prestigious literary prize, with works of mystery, self-discovery, and loss finding their place among 2008’s finalists. One of these selected works is Toronto-based author Rivka Galchen’s first novel, Atmospheric Disturbances. Though still relatively unknown, the novel has been steadi-ly garnering praise across the coun-try: the Canada Council for the Arts

called it “a poignant and very funny journey inside a mistaken mind,” “wonderfully sly [with a] magnifi-cently skewed sense of humour.”

This unusual postmodernist book follows the story of Dr. Leo Liebenstein, a psychiatrist who believes that the woman he is living with is not his wife, Rema, but a per-fect double unaware of her replace-ment. In his search for answers, he teams up with his patient, Harvey, who has convinced himself that he has the ability to control the weather, and is working as a secret agent for the Royal Academy of Meteorology. Together they attempt to locate the

missing Rema and stop the Royal Academy’s nemeses, a group of devi-ant meteorologists by the name of the 49 Quantum Fathers, from dis-turbing regular weather patterns.

Although unconventional in its approach to the topics of sanity, real-ity, and perception, Atmospheric Disturbances is a beautifully writ-ten tale of a man willing to take his convictions as far as necessary in order to find comfort and the one he loves. The book’s style is perhaps better suited to a short story as the diagrams, photos, and scientific defi-nitions included tend to detract from Galchen’s effortless prose.

However, overall the novel does get its message across, showing us exactly how difficult love is to main-tain. Leo’s unwillingness to love this new Rema exaggeratedly depicts how couples often grow apart. He often states that the doppelganger is “not the woman I married,” mirror-ing the usual sentiment expressed when one’s partner seems to change.

The first-person narration of Atmospheric Disturbances further blurs the line between Leo’s adven-tures and reality, as he often juxta-poses intelligent scientific observa-tions against anecdotes on chimp-

human hybrids, waitresses’ waists, and canine emotions.

Although endearing, Leo’s consis-tent denial of his own insanity and pseudo-logical search for his missing wife do become tiresome. However, just when it seems like the charac-ter has alienated himself from the reader with his ongoing and upbeat commentary, Galchen ends with a chapter heartbreaking in its calm resignation.

With its charming style and beau-tifully tragic theme, Atmospheric Disturbances is well worth the read and certainly worthy of the recogni-tion it has been given.

Alyssa FavreauCulture Writer

Never trust a doppelgangerAtmospheric Disturbances follows one man’s offbeat quest to find the wife he thinks he married

Jaime MacleanCulture Writer

Half man, half cockroachMontreal’s Rawi Hage pens an existential award winner

Delirious visions of life on the edge in Montreal.

Sas

ha P

lotn

ikov

a /

The

McG

ill D

aily

The 20th century has seen war, bloodshed, and humanitar-ian catastrophe, carried out

by crudely armed tribal groups and modern industrial superpowers. In these situations, humanitarians find themselves in a problematic position. They can decide to remain silent and continue to give aid to those who sur-vive, or speak out against the atroci-ties and risk being expelled from the affected country. The position of the Red Cross in Nazi Germany repre-sented perhaps the epitome of such moral dilemmas.

Dr. James Orbinski, former presi-dent of Médecins sans Frontières, is no stranger to these questions. His latest book, An Imperfect Offering, gives detailed accounts of his experi-ences in some of the worst humani-tarian disasters in recent memory. Beginning his work in Rwanda inves-tigating the condition of paediatric AIDS, he realizes that much of the widespread pain and suffering he saw could have been prevented had the right political and economic choices been made. From there he travelled to Peru during a cholera epidemic, to Somalia during the American-led intervention, and to Afghanistan, which was still reeling from the attempted Soviet invasion.

Above all, it was Orbinski’s expe-rience in Rwanda during its 1994

genocide that would fundamen-tally change him. “The Genocide in Rwanda was my undoing,” he writes, “It was where I came to know inti-mately the fullness of what we are capable of as human beings. No illu-sions or fantasies were possible after this; no retreat into false hopes or comforting yearning for a lost past.” The failure of both the Rwandan gov-ernment and the international com-munity truly altered his understand-ing of the world.

When governments like the United States and France initially blocked attempts to label the Rwanda crisis as a genocide – a distinction that would have made it obligatory for the Security Council to intervene – Orbinski decided to take a differ-ent approach. Too much emphasis, he believes, has been placed on the need for humanitarian groups to remain neutral – ultimately, such a position is impossible. To not speak out against atrocities committed by regimes essentially legitimizes them, allowing the acts to continue.

“The doctor’s role is to wit-ness authentically the reality of humanity, and to speak out against the horrors of political inaction,” Orbinski explains. “The only crimes of equal inhumanity are the crimes of indifference, silence, and forget-ting.” Ultimately, governments will act largely in their own self inter-est, not within the realm of higher humanitarian ideals. Orbinski calls upon humanitarians present on the ground at areas of crisis to tell the world what is happening.

Culture The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 200916

Only a few days after New Years, reflections on the most memorable films

of 2008 began, and amongst the contenders one title stands out: Yves Christian Fournier’s Tout Est Parfait. The film, which centres on the life of a Quebec youth after the suicide of four of his friends, espe-cially in light of recent events, is the single most important Quebec film of 2008.

2009 was christened with the shocking news of a murder-sui-cide in the Saguenay, a region five hours north of Montreal, seeming-ly reflecting Tout Est Parfait’s graphic images. On January 1, 2009, a 9-1-1 call was made by a woman leading police officers to her home in Chicoutimi, Quebec where her husband and the couple’s three young children were found dead. According to the police, the deaths were a result of a pact between the couple to commit suicide for the new year.

Tout Est Parfait, an award-winning film written by Guillaume Vigneault and directed by Fournier, unfolds a plot which chillingly echoes these recent events, as well as those of a 1993 suicide pact, when six children in the commu-nity of Davis Inlet attempted to commit suicide on the anniversary

of the deaths of their friends who had earlier died in a house fire.

Mainly concerned with the aftermaths of youth suicide in a typical industrial town, the film focuses on the emptiness and silence that befalls the commu-nity and on the space in between choosing life or choosing death. The film sees Josh (Maxime Dumontier) struggling with the deaths of his friends Alex, Simon, Thomas, and Sacha. Through his interactions with Sacha’s ex-girlfriend and Thomas’ father, Josh tries to come to terms with how to live “normally.” Although the group of boys at the centre of the storyline are not often depict-

ed alive, for the brief moments that these characters are on the screen, they leave an intense imprint, which remains even after the credits have rolled.

Music drives the emotional ten-sion in the film; music and silenc-es serve to demonstrate the diffi-culty of speaking about the emo-

tions tied to suicide and turmoil that follows such a dramatic event in the lives of those left to mourn a friend’s suicide. Notably, singer-songwriter Cat Power sets the mood for two climactic moments of the film with her song “Maybe Not” and her cover of “Troubled Waters.” Reflecting on the events that began 2009 in the community of Saguenay Lac-St-Jean is easily likened to the emotion found in the songs of Cat Power, which was masterfully chosen by the film’s music researcher Phil Electric. The original score, composed by Patrick Lavoie, is also an impor-tant factor in the way that the film manages to establish its setting

and mood so expertly. Tout Est Parfait addresses

the difficult subject of suicide in Quebec in an engaging and artis-tic way. Its importance for those who have lived or know those who have lived similar circum-stances cannot be overstated.

Pamela FillionThe McGill Daily

A Quebec youth struggles with the suicide of four friends. Akhil Virani for The McGill Daily

Ryan MackellarCulture Writer

Troubled waters in Davis InletReflections on life and death in Tout Est Parfait

The film focuses on the silence that befalls and

the space in between choosing life and death.

Humanitarians can’t afford to be neutral

Dr. James Orbinski’s memoir questions crimes of inaction

A 2008 nominee for the Governor General’s Award, The Imperfect Offering: Humanitarian Action in the Twenty-first Century is $35.

Wanted: Copy Editer

The Daily is lookeing for you to be a part of are team. Is you looking for a opportunity to worck in a dynamic enviernment, develop you’re gram-matical skills, and gain experients in the exiting field of journalism. If you cant read this add with out cringe-ing, then this position is for you. Email The Daily at coordinating@mcgilldaily.com, or drop by Shattner B-24, we are almost always hear.

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009 17Culture

Art around the clockA week-long celebration of all

things “art” – with performances, screenings, competitions, and more – kicked off on campus Monday with poetry and music, and continues today and tomorrow with a series of student-written, directed, and acted plays in addition to short film screenings. The ARTifact festival, hosted by McGill’s Tuesday Night Café Theatre, closes on Saturday with the famed 24-hour play-writing competition, in which three students are given 24 hours to write a play for ten actors, and then another 24 hours to direct, stage, and perform it. In addition, a gallery showcasing McGill students’ visual art remains up throughout the week – so come out and support the arts in every form! Tickets are $6 for students and $10 for non-students. All shows are at 8p.m. Contact TNC Theatre at artifact@tues-daynightcafe.com, or call 398-6600 for more information.

– Spencer MalthouseTNC Theatre

CULTUREBRIEF

Walking into the Goethe institute you can’t help but notice the immacu-

lately clean floors. After exchanging some formal pleasantries with adroit receptionists while flipping through a German language course pamphlet, you hang your jacket nicely into rows of waiting hangers. Surgically cut half muffins present themselves next to percolating coffee. Anticipating the films to come, the guests sit waiting for a cultural experience. Downing a dry mash of doughy coffee, I begin to choke in my comfy chair. Canine cunnilingus flashes on the screen. Outstretched legs accept a lapping dog to the overdub of a young woman describing herself as a young revolu-tionary. The first short film of Marie Brassard’s selection for The Goethe Institutes’ Carte Blanche has begun.

If the films reveal anything about the woman who chose them, I would have to peg Marie Brassard as

a natural outsider. Isabell Spengler, a Berliner teaching experimental film at Universität der Künste, has three offerings in this selection. Latouy is seven minutes of detached and beau-tiful images while a somewhat more linear plot follows The Natural Life of Mermaids and Psychic Tequila Tarot. The pseudo-plot of the latter follows the idealist Leila through a western road trip. She acts as a ves-sel, filling herself with the desires of others – from ex-sorority girls to drunken gamblers – by creating fic-tive fortunes and wedding them with reality. Whether performing a blow-job or trying to convince a prostitute her life is perfect the way it is, Leila is striving to reach the unreachable innards of others. Refusing respon-sibility for her “own existence” is the way she deals with a sense of discon-nect from society. And she’s pretty much naked the whole time.

If you’re counting on plot and style as clean as the welcome rug guarding the Goethe institute, this short film may not be for you. There’s an ama-teurish feel to Psychic Tequila Tarot

and Spengler’s other works, espe-cially the playfully absurd Natural Life of Mermaids. But if you can get past the stylistic slush, you can for-give Spengler on the grounds of her far-reaching, bold messages.

The Nomi Song by Andrew Horn presents a more linear film: a docu-mentary bio. Clause Nomi has come to be associated with elven space-men for a reason – Nomi looked like one while singing some of the most inspirational pop-opera of the New York New Wave age. The trajectory of his career was fairly short, but it reached its peak when Nomi was a back-up singer for David Bowie on Saturday Night Live, and ended early with the devastation of AIDS. He’s described as the “most mesmerizing freak show in the his-tory of Rock and Roll” and does not disappoint. Andrew Horn had to dig deep for this cultural nugget, as very little footage of Nomi existed outside his SNL performance. An unsuspecting closet in Sweden held an hour of footage on Super 8 film, and Horn relied on six degrees of

separation for much of his inter-views and colouring.

Camera-ready and made up as a style-minded invader, Nomi also appears as an outsider – there’s the persistent feeling throughout the film that we can’t get beyond his styled exterior. He is a challenging character, but anecdotes of his voice reverberating around his New York courtyard on lazy afternoons give this little-told story some ground-ing in reality – a redeeming achieve-ment, considering the surreal image of Clause Nomi is about as believable as a Psychic Tarot Tequila diva in his first appearances on screen.

Nicholas van BeekCulture Writer

Cinema on the edgeMarie Brassard’s provocative selections explore the fringe of German film

The Carte Blanche begins January 15 and 16 with Berlin, Symphony of a City, and Berlin Song, followed by The Nomi Song and Spengler’s three short films on the 22 and 23 of January. A string of other selections continue until March 13, closing with The Wonderful Horrible Life of Leni Riefenstahl. For the full program check out www.goethe.de/INS/ca/mon/enindex.htm.

Nadja Popovich / The McGill Daily

Evan

New

ton

/ Th

e M

cGill

Dai

ly

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009Compendium!

The mysterious gods of Canadian air travel spared me their worst punishments during the holi-

days, but I too toiled, dear reader. It started in Victoria. After hav-

ing gone through security, I found out that my red-eye Westjet flight was delayed by three hours. I killed time in the airport bar, where some drunk guy recounted to me his tale of financial ruin, love gone wrong, and hypnosis. He explained, ad nauseum, how hypnotherapy had brought about his “spiritual awaken-ing.” Fortunately, we weren’t seated next to each other when the plane finally boarded. I got some sleep, and made it to Calgary by 1:30 a.m.

But due to the delay, I risked miss-ing my Calgary connection. This inconvenience would’ve been costly, forcing me to play Elvis Pinball in the video arcade at 50 cents per game all night long.

I thought the Canadian air travel gods were smiling on me when I found the Montreal-bound flight waiting. But as I settled in, the PA system crackled, and my illusions were shattered. We weren’t moving, our pilot said, until the maintenance crew had fixed a damaged panel on the hull of our jet. Groaning, I braced myself for endless hours stuck on the tarmac. But with festive good cheer, I noted that trained technicians were busy ensuring that our plane would not fall apart in mid-air.

Anyway, I had lots of fun things to distract myself from reality, notably a personal TV built into the back of the chair ahead of me. For a small fee, I had my pick of several first-rate films, such as Beverley Hills Chihuahua. Tempting, because I knew from trailers that this was the “Greatest Chihuahua film ever made.”

Satellite TV was free, but it was mostly trashy late-night fare aimed at a viewership expected to be semi-unconscious. Some Jerry Springer knock off berated an irresponsible pit-bill owner. CLICK. Fox News served up coverage about a chi-huahua that had survived a pitbull attack. CLICK. Infomercials hawked products of questionable merit, such as Tony’s Total Workout DVD and a vacuum cleaner with “super suction power.”

CLICK. I eventually settled on the

least distracting, but perhaps most nauseating broadcast of all. The Discovery Channel was featuring a series of docudramas about great air-plane disasters! It seems, dear reader, that in the eighties, Air Canada Flight 143 was forced to make an emergency landing in Gimli, Manitoba, after hav-ing run out of fuel. Apparently some incompetent jerk had confused his metric and imperial measurements, putting a brand new plane and some people into jeopardy.

Just then, from deep in the belly of the plane, I could hear what sounded like a ratchet gun tighten-ing bolts. “Ah, that’s the sound of a skilled tradesman properly fastening vital components onto the plane,” I thought. Meanwhile, on-screen, a computer animation recreated the crash landing of Flight 143. The plane lurched awkwardly in midair before descending on a decommissioned runway. Its tires blew out as the nose grinded along the strip in a shower of sparks, almost plowing through a pair of bike-riding children, before coming to a halt at the edge of a cliff.

“Maintenance is all finished,” the pilot announced. The TVs flickered off, and flight attendants happily mimed the safety procedures. A baby started crying, perhaps sensing our impending doom.

As we blasted off into the cold night, I remained preoccupied by my angst. The TVs came back on, and I switched the channel to an info-mercial for “The Ultimate Oldies But Goodies Collection,” featuring clas-sic bands such as Buddy Holly. Hey, didn’t he die in an airplane crash? CLICK. Ah, the news. I wonder if I could watch coverage of our immi-nent demise live on CTV? CLICK. An ad for some vacation company plays a rip-off of Bob Marley’s “One Love.” I was never a religious man until tonight, dear reader, but never did the Herbsman’s words mean so much. (All together now: “Give thanks and praise to the Lord and it’ll be alright!”) Prayer seemed to be my only option, as I neglected to pack a parachute in the bulletproof back-pack that I always bring on planes in case of a terrorist attack.

You may call me a fool, but I think the airline gods heard my call that night. Unbelievers, get hypnotized.

My not-so-excellent holiday adventureDavid G. Koch tackles airport boredom, chihuahuas, and watching inappropriate TV from coast to coast

Angel Chen’s illustrations appear every other Thursday. Send her your thoughts on mediums and gas to angelclchen@gmail.com. Sterling Street appears every Thursday. Send Margot your code to margot.nossal@gmail.com.

Ang

el C

hen

for

The

McG

ill D

aily

Lies, half-truths, and Gimli

Braden Goyette / The McGill Daily

For what they’ve gained in personal entertainment, planes have lost in tact.

The McGill Daily, Thursday, January 15, 2009 19

volume 98number 27

editorial 3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-24

Montreal QC, H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6784fax 514.398.8318

mcgilldaily.com

coordinating editor

Jennifer Markowitzcoordinating@mcgilldaily.com

coordinating news editor Shannon Kiely

news editorsErin Hale

Nicholas SmithAlison Withers

features editorClaire Caldwell

commentary&compendium editor Max Halparin

coordinating culture editor Braden Goyette

culture editors Joshua Frank

Whitney Mallett

science+technology editor Nikki Bozinoff

mind&body editor Nadja Popovich

photo editor Stephen Davis

graphics editor Evan Newton

production & design editorsWill Vanderbilt

Aaron Vansintjan

web editor Ian Beattie

copy editor Alexandra Kelp

cover photo Charles Mostoller

le délit Maysa Phares

redaction@delitfrancais.com

ContributorsMelanie Adelson, Julie Alsop, Niko Block,

Sophie Busby, Angel Chen, Christopher Columb, Alyssa Favreau, Pamela Fillion, Emma Gray, Deborah

Guterman, Olivia Hoffmeyer, David G. Koch, Hayley Lapalme, Sally Lin, Ryan Mackellar, Jaime Maclean,

Sam Neylon, Josh Nobleman, Margot Nossal, Sasha Plotnikova, Sana Saeed, Amelia Schonbeck,

Marc Selles, Ted Sprague, Nicholas van Beek, Aquil Virani, Rachel Wine, Alexandra Wong,

Benjamin Wong, Hartlee Zucker

The Daily is proud to be a founding member of the Canadian University Press.

All contents © 2009 Daily Publications Society. All rights reserved. The content of this newspaper is the responsibil-

ity of The McGill Daily and does not necessarily represent the views of McGill University. Products or companies advertised in this newspaper are not necessarily endorsed by Daily staff.

Printed by Imprimerie Transcontinental Transmag. Anjou, Quebec. ISSN 1192-4608.

The Daily is published on most Mondays and Thursdays by the Daily Publications Society, an autonomous, not-for-profit

organization whose membership includes all McGill undergraduates and most graduate students.

3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-26Montreal QC, H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6790fax 514.398.8318

advertising & general manager Boris Shedovtreasury & fiscal manager Pierre Bouillon

ad layout & design Geneviève Robertdps board of directors

Angel Chen, Ana Gray Richardson-Bachand,Braden Goyette, Lauren Chang MacLean, Jennifer Markowitz, Lawrence Monoson,

Maysa Phares, Perrin Valli, Eric Van Eyken (chair@dailyproductions.org)

EDITORIAL

Stifling discussion won’t solve the conflict

Governments and media outlets have been nearly unanimous in condemning the Israeli offensive in Gaza. As the humanitarian crisis reaches new peaks, people are demanding strong stances from their public institutions.

This week the Israeli Central Elections Committee voted to ban Arab political parties from its upcoming elections. With the world focusing on Israel’s offensive in Gaza, eliminating demo-cratic dissent is no way for the country to rebuild its international standing. However, there is little chance for the ban to come into effect, as Israel’s Supreme Court is expected to overturn it.

Here in Canada, Sid Ryan, the President of the Ontario branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), is also endanger-ing peaceful dissent. In December, he proposed a motion demand-ing all Canadian universities ban any Israeli professor who did not denounce the war in Gaza. While we recognize the right of CUPE executives to their own views, persecuting intellectuals in Canadian universities is no way to further a political cause – not to mention a clear violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The diversity of opinion held by Israelis could easily be explored in Canada – but Ryan hopes to stop any type of discussion by threatening the livelihoods of those most qualified to participate. The motion disregards the complex motivations that have led individuals to arrive at their political beliefs, from heritage and religion, to nationality and political affiliation.

Limiting discussion at a time like this doesn’t help Gazan or Israeli civilians; rather than changing public opinion it forces peo-ple with a variety of views into one of two rigid, polarized catego-ries. Universities have long been havens for critical analysis, and as students this is a unique point in our lives when we will likely be exposed to many new ideas. Now, as we find ourselves shaken by the events in Gaza, it’s even more important to hold to that principle.

Students at Concordia protesting the war last week called for Montreal universities to cut ties with Israeli universities unless they make state-ments condemning the offensive, arguing that if Israeli universities remain silent, they are complicit in the outcome in Gaza. While these demands rightly seek to raise anti-war sentiment in Israel, a multitude of opinions and sentiments exist on any campus, and synthesizing them into a single protocol may only serve to stifle the exchange of ideas.

Israeli students and professors are engaging in discussion over the war, and should continue to do so. At universities in Tel Aviv, Haifa, and Jerusalem, hundreds protested for and against Israel’s offensive, as thousands have recently done in Montreal. These demonstra-tions hopefully reflect the opinions of people in Gaza and Israel who find themselves marginalized by their governments. We urge mem-bers within institutions – be they universities, unions, and govern-ments – to keep talking. Shutting down discussion helps no one.

Evan

New

ton

/ Th

e M

cGill

Dai

ly

Have a burning desire to ask 19,000 students a question?Got an idea for SSMU policy?

This is your chance to make a difference!!CALL A STUDENT INITIATED REFERENDUM!

Pick up a petition for a Student initiated referendum NOW either from the Elections McGill Offi ce (Shatner 405) or

online at www.electionsmcgill.ca

All questions must be approved by the Chief Returning Offi cer before collecting signatures.

Call for Referendum Questions!

All petitions are due at 12:00 noon on February 4th

Shatner Room 405514-398-6474

contact@electionsmcgill.ca

Printing the whole picture since 1911

McGillDAILY

THE

Wanted: Copy Editer

The Daily is lookeing for you to be a part of are team. Is you looking for a opportunity to worck in a dynamic enviernment, develop you’re gram-matical skills, and gain experients in the exiting field of journalism. If you cant read this add with out cringe-ing, then this position is for you. Email The Daily at coordinating@mcgilldaily.com, or drop by Shattner B-24, we are almost always hear.