Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Medicare in Personal Injury Claim Settlements: Complying With Reporting Requirements and Satisfying Liens
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
THURSDAY, MARCH 26, 2015
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Jeremy T. Burton, Partner, Lipe Lyons Murphy Nahrstadt & Pontikis, Chicago
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can
address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your
location by completing each of the following steps:
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of
attendees at your location
• Click the SEND button beside the box
If you have purchased Strafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your
participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE
Form).
You may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the
appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner.
If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For
additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at
1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Jeremy Burton
Lipe Lyons Murphy Nahrstadt & Pontikis Ltd.
230 West Monroe Street, Suite 2260
Chicago, IL 606006 (312) 448-6231
Medicare
Trial and Settlement Considerations
Trial and Settlement Considerations
Introduction
Considerations for Plaintiff’s counsel
Considerations for Defense counsel
Settlement language
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
6
Introduction
Medicare is a government program providing health care. Under Medicare, the government reimburses health care providers for covered care provided.
Until 1980, Medicare was the primary payer of all medical costs except in workers’ compensation cases.
After 1980, Medicare is always a secondary payer to liability insurance, self-insurance, no-fault insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance. Medicare is also a secondary payer to group health plan coverage in certain situations.
7
Introduction
Insurers are not allowed to
write policies secondary to
Medicare. Such policies
would supersede federal
law.
8
Introduction
Since 1980, Medicare beneficiaries, attorneys,
insurers, self-insured entities, third party
administrators and their agents have been
responsible for
(1) Understanding when there is coverage primary to
Medicare,
(2) Notifying Medicare when applicable,
(3) Paying appropriately.
9
Introduction
The new law, Section 111 of the Medicare, Medicaid
and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA Section)
“Adds mandatory reporting requirements with respect to
Medicare beneficiaries who have coverage under group
health plan arrangements as well as for Medicare
beneficiaries who receive settlements, judgments,
awards or other payment from liability insurance, no-
fault insurance, or workers’ compensation.”
10
Introduction
Implementation dates for the new law were originally January 1, 2009 for group health plans to register and July 1, 2009 for liability insurers to register.
Insurers must report claims with settlement dates on or
after October 1, 2011.*
In certain cases where an insurer has ongoing responsibility for medical claims, claims arising after January 1, 2010 must be reported.
11
Introduction
*Reporting Thresholds
Not repayment thresholds
January 1, 2012 >$100,000
July 1, 2012 >$50,000
October 1, 2012 >$25,000
January 1, 2013 >$5,000
January 1, 2014 >$2,000
January 1, 2015 >$1,000
12
Introduction
The new law is designed to enforce the statutes
passed in 1980.
It does not substantively change the pre-existing
Medicare law and statutes.
It adds new reporting rules.
It includes penalties for noncompliance.
13
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Intake Considerations
Is the client 65 or older?
Receiving Social Security Disability?
Suffering from end-stage renal disease?
Obtain your client’s Medicare identification card
Advise Defense counsel
14
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Pleading Considerations
Any operative amended complaint must occur prior
to the date of settlement, judgment, award or other
payment and must not have the effect of improperly
shifting the burden to Medicare by amending the
prior complaint to remove any claim for medical
damages.
Section 111 NGHP User Guide, Chapter III, 1-1. Version 4.5.
15
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Lien Concerns
Explain to your client that a substantial portion of
their settlement will be payable to Medicare.
Inform your client that Medicare costs may have a
significant impact on your chances to favorably
resolve the case.
16
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Future Medicals
Advise your client that Medicare has a right to
recover any amount they expend on future medical
care. You may want to consider the availability of a
special needs trust or other ways to escrow money
for future medical costs.
17
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Future Medicals
“You should also be aware that if you do not repay
Medicare in full, it may decide to recover any
amounts you owe (including accrued interest) from
any Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits
to which you might otherwise be entitled, or from
future Medicare payments.”
18
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Penalty Provisions
42 C.F.R. Sect. 411.24(g)
Recovery from parties that receive primary payments. CMS has a right of action to recover its payments from any entity, including a beneficiary provider, supplier, physician, attorney, State agency or private insurer that has received a primary payment.
19
Considerations for Plaintiff’s Counsel
Penalty Provisions
U.S. v. Harris, 2009 WL 891931 (N.D.W.Va)
The CMS calculated the amount it was owed, after subtracting amounts for attorney’s fees and costs. The CMS made its demand by letter, and after the statutory time elapsed without appeal the government filed suit. The court granted summary judgment to the government and ordered the Plaintiff’s counsel to pay the judgment plus interest.
20
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Discovery
Is the plaintiff a beneficiary?
Has the plaintiff received benefits?
What has the plaintiff done with respect to the lien?
21
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Discovery
Form A-1
Allows an insurer to determine whether the plaintiff is a Medicare beneficiary. Obtain with interrogatories.
Full name, Medicare claim number (HICN), date of birth, social security number and sex.
22
Considerations for Defense Counsel
A completed A-1 form allows an insurer to query the
Benefits Coordination & Recovery Center (BCRC)
to determine whether an injured party is a Medicare
beneficiary.
23
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Reporting
Make certain your client – insurer or self-insured entity
is registered to report.
http://www.Section111.cms.hhs.gov
If a complaint or discovery lists the date of a plaintiff’s
injury or exposure after December 5, 1980, Medicare
will require a report.
24
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Reporting
When a case involves continued exposure, Medicare
focuses on the date of last exposure to determine
whether the exposure continued after 12/5/80. The
application of the 12/5/80 date is specific to a particular
defendants.
Medicare will assert a recovery claim against exposure
after 12/5/80 if liability is claimed, released or effectively
released.
25
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Reporting
When the following requirements are met, Medicare will not assert a recovery claim and reporting is not required.
• All exposure ended before 12/5/80
• Exposure has not been claimed in the most recently amended complaint and/or specifically released.
• There is no release for exposure after 12/5/80 or whether there is a release it is a broad general release which effectively releases exposure.
26
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Reporting
The RRE does not make a determination of what
portion of any settlement is for medicals and what
portion is not.
If medicals are claimed and/or released the
settlement, judgment, award or other payment bust be
reported regardless of any allocation made by the
parties or a determination by the court.
27
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Reporting
The CMS is not bound by any allocation made by the parties even where a court has approved such an allocations. The CMS does normally defer to an allocation made through a jury verdict or after a hearing on the merits.
This issue is relevant to whether the CMS has a recovery claim and does not affect the RRE’s obligation to report.
Section 111 NGHP User Guide, Chapter III, 6-22, Version 4.5.
28
Considerations for Defense Counsel
NGHP RRE BCRC Primary
Payer/Debtor
29
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Third Party Administrators
The new Medicare reporting requirements are
complicated enough that the CMS has anticipated
that RREs will hire Third-Party Administrators
(TPAs) to handle reporting and payment
obligations.
42 U.S.C. 1396y(b)(7)&(8)
30
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Medicare Penalties
Medicare beneficiaries are required to reimburse
Medicare within 60 days of receipt of settlement.
If Medicare is not reimbursed by the beneficiary,
payment becomes the responsibility of the primary
payer.
31
Why Report
The CMS has a right of action to recover its payments
from any entity, including a beneficiary, provider,
supplier, physician, attorney, State agency or private
insurer that has received a primary payment.
42 CFR Sec. 411.24(g)
32
Why Report
If Medicare is not reimbursed as required by
paragraph (h) of this section, the primary payer must
reimburse Medicare even though it has already
reimbursed the beneficiary or other party.
42 CFR Sec. 411.24(i)
33
Why Report
The United States can collect double damages and attorneys fees against any entity not paying under the new statute.
Furthermore,
An applicable plan that fails to comply with the Medicare reporting requirements is subject to a civil money penalty of $1,000 for each day of noncompliance with respect to each claimant. 42 USC Sec. 1395y(b)(8)(E)(i)
34
Considerations for Defense Counsel
New Process
(1) Determine the Medicare status of all
claimants
(2) RRE must report settlements
(3) RRE must resolve liens
(4) RRE must give consideration to Medicare’s
interest in future payments
35
Considerations for Defense Counsel
ORM/TPOC and Date of Settlement
It may be but not always is the check date or payment date, it is the date the obligation is signed, if there’s a written agreement, unless court approval is required. If court approval is required it is the later of the date the obligation is signed or the date of court approval. If there is no written agreement it is the date the payment, or the first payment if there will be multiple payments is issued.
See http://www.cms.gov/MandatoryInsRep/Downloads/March11NGHPTranscript.pdf, pg. 15.
36
Considerations for Defense Counsel
Medicare Set Asides
1. Medical damages from
the date of injury through
the date of settlement.
2. Future medical damages
from the date of
settlement forward.
37
Medicare Set Asides
In non-workers’ compensation cases, you are not required to set aside money for future damages to pay for plaintiff’s future medical expenses. There is some disagreement on this topic. Many defense firms are advising clients to set aside funds for future medical expenses. The CMS has confirmed that set asides are not required in liability cases, though they have also noted that they “reserve their right” to both challenge agreements which do not adequately cover Medicare costs and the future right to require set asides in liability cases.
You should consider something like a Medicare Set Aside (MSA) for future medical damages. This set aside is used in workers’ compensation cases to “reasonably protect Medicare’s future interests.”
If the CMS approves the proposed set-aside all parties will receive “safe harbor” protection from future government collection action.
38
Medicare Set Asides
Unfortunately, CMS is not
in a position to review set
asides at this time.
As an alternative you can
make a Claims Settlement
Allocation (CSA).
39
Medicare Set Asides
The following standards apply to MSAs in workers’ compensation cases and should be taken into account in other liability cases.
A MSA is available where the claimant is currently a Medicare beneficiary and the TPOC is greater than $25,000.
Or where the plaintiff will soon be a Medicare beneficiary and the TPOC amount for future medical expenses, disability and lost wages is expected to be greater than $250,000.
40
Medicare Set Asides A MSA is not necessary where:
1. The facts of the case demonstrate that the injured individual is only being compensated for past medical expenses; and
2. There is no evidence that the individual is attempting to maximize the other aspects of settlement to Medicare’s detriment; and
3. The individual’s treating physicians conclude in writing that, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, the individual will no longer require any Medicare-covered treatments related to the workers’ compensation injury.
41
Medicare Set Asides
A MSA/CSA must show a good-faith consideration of future medical expenses.
Remember that expenses must be related to the injury and in the appropriate case, you may want to consider a second review of medical records to eliminate overpaying for unrelated medical conditions.
Is there a need for a trust?
Can a Third Party administer the trust?
42
Medicare Set Asides
“We have continued to say with respect to set-
asides or liability situations that set-asides are not
required in terms of CMS being involved in any type
of determination of how much the set-asides should
be. We have also said that our regional offices
have the ability to evaluate proposed set-aside
amounts for liability if their workload permits them
to do so.”
43
Medicare Set Asides
“This is not the same thing as a blanket statement that liability set asides are simply not required or not appropriate. Regardless of the mechanism, Medicare’s interests need to be protected. The statute says that we don’t make payment where payment has already been made. Whether or not this is protected through setting up a formal set-aside, setting up a formal trust, simply keeping the money and insuring that it’s being [paid] in a priority manner to Medicare until the appropriate funds are exhausted; those are all choices, but we need to make it clear that’s not the same thing as saying – and that we are not in fact saying that liability set-asides aren’t appropriate.”
http://www.cms.gov/MandatoryInsRep/Downloads/Jan2810NGHPTranscript.pdf, pg. 17.
44
Medicare Set Asides
The CMS has noted their “standard expectation is that they
will be pursuing recoveries against settlements received by
individual beneficiaries.” However the CMS further notes
that “there are limited instances where CMS has gone back
to an insurer or to an attorney particularly if, for instance, an
attorney for a beneficiary who ignores CMS’s demand,
technically, there are some risks under the regulation. Is it
any type of standard practice for us to routinely go back to an
insurer or attorney or other entity when we’ve issued the
demand to the beneficiary? No.”
See http://www.cms.gov/MandatoryInsRep/Downloads/Feb2510NGHPTranscript.pdf, pg. 37.
45
Creating Medicare Set Asides
If both sides have obtained medical records in written
discovery, you likely have a blue print to create a
successful MSA.
If both sides have testimony from medical experts
regarding permanency and anticipated future medical
damages you are in an even better position.
If one or both sides have hired an economist to analyze
future medical needs, your work is almost complete.
46
Creating Medicare Set Asides
As a general rule in creating a set aside, your Medicare Allocation Report should include the following.
The beneficiary’s name
The beneficiary’s address
The beneficiary’s social security number
The beneficiary’s current age
The beneficiary’s life expectancy
The date of the injury
The state of jurisdiction
47
Creating Medicare Set Asides
The related diagnoses and ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes
An introduction and description of the injury
A medical history including relevant doctors’ visits,
examinations, and surgeries
Summaries of the relevant doctors’ visits,
examinations, and surgeries
Physician diagnoses, prognoses, recommended
course of treatment and if available opinions on
possible future surgeries and all future costs.
A list of pre-existing and unrelated conditions
48
Creating Medicare Set Asides
A summary of the plaintiff’s current functional states and
ability to perform activities of daily living.
A summary of the future treatment plan including doctors’
visits, future surgery, and anticipated prescription costs.
A bottom line MSA number.
Your report should also contain the methodology utilized to
explain how you calculated the final number, e.g. adjusted
life expectancy and discount rate. The more you rely on
verifiable medical information, the more protected you and
your client will be.
49
Settlement Language
Madison County, Illinois has entered an order in Asbestos cases
with helpful suggested settlement language.
As part of settlement, Plaintiff’s counsel must complete Medicare
Form B in order to finalize any settlement agreement.
Medicare Form B requires all of the same information contained in
the A-1 form as well as information that Medicare requires such as
the diagnosis code for the plaintiff’s illness, the name of the settling
defendant, the date of the settlement, the amount of settlement and
information on the funding of settlement.
50
Settlement Language
Releases should be tailored to discuss Medicare obligations. If
there are no future medical damages, that should be stated in the
release. If possible, obtain indemnification, defense and hold
harmless language from the plaintiff’s firm ensuring that a paying
RRE will be protected from double paying and double damages.
At the very least, all settlement agreements should state who is
responsible for investigating Medicare liens, and who is responsible
for satisfying any Medicare liens.
51
Settlement Language
The language of the Madison County order notes that
(1) Defendant will not include Medicare on the settlement
check.
(2) PLAINTIFF'S FIRM agrees to hold in its trust account
sufficient funds to pay all Medicare claims or liens relating to
such settlement …or has in fact satisfied all Medicare claims or
liens in full. PLAINTIFF'S FIRM will notify ... CMS, of any
settlement which this Agreement governs and will work to
satisfy or otherwise obtain discharge or release of any
Medicare claim or lien including "set asides," if any.
52
Settlement Language
(3) If defendant receives a claim for any unsatisfied Medicare claim … defendant will notify PLAINTIFF'S FIRM … and request from them any evidence that the claim or lien has been satisfied in full … If such evidence is not forthcoming or fails to resolve the claim in full without payment by defendant, defendant may by regular mail notify PLAINTIFF'S FIRM to undertake the principal response to the matter or to arrange payment or other resolution. If the U.S. government or its designee including CMS brings suit, PLAINTIFF'S FIRM will undertake the principal defense of such matter … PLAINTIFF'S FIRM will be liable to defendant for the amount owed or paid by such defendant to the United States Government … for the allegedly unsatisfied Medicare claim or lien plus all attorney fees and out of pocket expenses reasonably necessary …
53
Settlement Language
But consider
Many plaintiff’s firms will refuse an indemnification provision. Some
states have ruled finding that a plaintiff’s attorney cannot agree to
indemnify an opposing party for unpaid liens.
Illinois Adv. Op. 06-10 (2006).
54
Other settlement options
Medicare has acknowledged that it can be a joint payee on
settlement checks. The main issue with such a solution is that it
puts the burden on the plaintiff to contest non-suit related charges
and it will inevitably delay payment to the plaintiff, especially in
cases where significant future medical costs are anticipated.
Moreover, drafting a check in such a manner does not absolve a
RRE from further following up to ensure that Medicare is
reimbursed.
55
Other settlement options
Tomlinson v. Landers, 2009 WL 1117399 (M.D.Fla.)
In Tomlinson the defendant included Medicare on the settlement
check. The plaintiff returned the check and requested that
Medicare not be included on the check, promising instead that it
would hold the defendant carrier harmless for any Medicare liens.
The court found that including Medicare on the settlement check
was not required under the rules, and further held that due to the
disagreement between the parties that the settlement was invalid
as the parties never had a meeting of the minds. Tomlinson does
not stand for the proposition that Medicare cannot be included on
the check when both parties are in agreement.
56
Settlement Considerations
In the case of a joint and several settlement, where
each defendant technically is responsible for the
whole settlement, each entity must report the entire
settlement, judgment, award or other payment.
If each defendant enters into a separate settlement,
they are each responsible for reporting the separate
settlement, judgment, award or other payment.
See http://www.cms.gov/MandatoryInsRep/Downloads/Jan2810NGHPTranscript.pdf, pg. 20
57
Settlement Considerations
What about cases wherein a discounted settlement does not allow for reimbursement of Medicare due to questionable liability?
“Waiver of Rights. The Secretary may waive (in whole or in part) the provisions of this subparagraph in the case of an individual claim if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in the best interests of the program established under this title.” 42 USC Secs. 1395 et seq.
58
Conditional Payment Estimate
We are writing to advise you that Medicare has identified a claim or number of claims for which you have primary payment responsibility and Medicare has made primary payment. The Medicare Secondary Payer provisions of the statute, 42 CFR 1395y(b)(2), precludes Medicare from paying for a beneficiary’s medical expenses when payment “has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made … under no-fault insurance”.
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
59
However, Medicare may pay for a beneficiary’s
covered medical expenses conditioned on
reimbursement to Medicare from proceeds received
pursuant to a third party liability settlement, award,
judgment, recovery or from any entity responsible
for making primary payment. Medicare must
recover these payments from the entity responsible
for payment or when payment has been made from
the entity/individual who has received payment for
these claims.
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
60
Enclosed is an itemization of conditional payments
made by Medicare on behalf of the Medicare
beneficiary referenced above. Currently, Medicare
has paid _______ in conditional payments related
to your claim.
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
61
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
Final Demand Letter
We are writing to you because we recently learned that you have made a liability claim relating to an illness, injury, or incident occurring on or about _____ and obtained a recovery. We have determined that you are required to repay the Medicare program _______ for the cost of medical care it paid relating to your liability recovery. (The term “recovery” includes a settlement, judgment, award or any other type of recovery.
62
Right to Request a Waiver - you have the right to
request that the Medicare program waive
recovery of the amount you owe in full or in part.
Your right to request a waiver is separate from
your right to appeal our determination, and you
may request both a waiver and an appeal at the
same time. The Medicare program may waive
recovery of the amount you owe if you can show
that you meet both of the following conditions:
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
63
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS 1. This overpayment (for purposes of requesting waiver of recovery, the amount you owe is considered an overpayment) was not your fault, because the information you gave us with your claims for Medicare benefits was correct and complete as far as you knew; and when the Medicare payment was made, you thought that it was the right payment; AND
2. Paying back this money would cause financial hardship or would be unfair for some other reason.
64
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
Right to Appeal - You also have the right to appeal our determination if you disagree that you owe Medicare as explained in Part I of this letter, of if you disagree with the amount that you owe Medicare ______ as explained in Part II of this letter. To file an appeal, you should send us a letter explaining why you think the amount you owe Medicare is incorrect and/or any reason(s) why you disagree with our determination.
120 days from receipt of letter.
65
Counsel should be familiar with whether their request
is for a complete waiver, a compromise allocation or a
full commutation before contacting any Medicare
representative. In the case of a compromise request,
counsel should be familiar with 42 CFR § 411.47 which
governs compromise settlements in workers’
compensation cases and is currently the best tool
available for an argument reducing a Medicare
payment in a liability case. That section states:
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
66
42 CFR § 411.47 proposes a ratio analysis.
If a settlement does not apportion the sum granted, the portion to be considered as payment for medical expenses is computed as follows:
Determine the ratio of the amount awarded to the total amount that would have been payable … if the claim had not been compromised.
Multiply that ratio by the total medical expenses incurred as a result of the injury or disease up to the date of the settlement.
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
67
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
But see Hadden v. United States,
In Hadden the plaintiff’s medical bills totaled over $82,000. The defendant settled the case for $125,000. After deducting attorneys’ fees, Medicare demanded over $62,000.
Hadden paid under protest noting that the settling defendant was only 10% at fault, and therefore arguing was only responsible for about $8,000 of his medical expenses.
68
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
The court applied the Chevron standard in
analyzing the Medicare related statutes. Chevron
U.S.A., Inc. v. National Resources Defense
Counsel, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984).
IF Congress “has directly spoken to the precise
question at issue” in the text of the statute, the
court gives effect to Congress’s answer without
regard to any divergent answers offered by the
agency or anyone else.
69
But, IF “the statute is silent or ambiguous with
respect to the specific issue, the question for the
court is whether the agency’s answer is based on a
permissible construction of the statute.”
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
70
The CMS has interpreted the statute finding that
Medicare is “entitled to a full reimbursement of
conditional Medicare payments when a beneficiary
receives a discounted settlement from a third party.
Zinman v. Shalala, 67 F.3d 841, 845 (9th Cir. 1995).
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
71
The scope of a payer’s responsibility for a beneficiary’s
medical expenses – is defined by the scope of the claim
against the payer, regardless of whether a compromise
has been reached or if the payer never admits liability.
“And thus a beneficiary cannot tell a third party that it is
responsible for all of his medical expenses, on the one
hand, and later tell Medicare that the same party was
responsible for only 10% of them, on the other.”
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
72
Similar language governs the plaintiff’s counsel’s
recovery under 42 C.F.R. Sec. 411.37(c)
Determine the ratio of the procurement costs to the
total judgment or settlement payment.
Apply the ratio to the Medicare payment. The product
is the Medicare share of procurement costs.
Negotiating Settlement with the CMS
73