Michael L. Parson, Governor

MAR O 5

Mr. Mark Hyde Plant Manager CertainTeed Corporation 100 CertainTeed Drive Jonesburg, MO 63351

Carol S. Comer, Director

RE: New Source Review Permit Amendment - Permit Number: 122017-008B Project Number: 2018-10-051; Installation Number: 139-0052

Dear Mr. Hyde:

This permit amendment is in response to an application received October 31, 2018. CertainTeed Corporation requested to increase the limestone mill project design capacity from I to I tph on a 24-hr basis. The I tph value is the nameplate throughput and CertainTeed has determined that there are some operational inefficiencies when the mill throughput is reduced to the current I tph. The storage pile throughput limit is not changing from -tpy. Control device air flowrates and exit grain loading are not changing. Revised potential emissions are summarized below. Detailed emission calculations are attached to this letter. No special conditions in permits 122017-008 or 122017-008A are affected. A revised ambient air quality impact analysis (modeling) will be conducted under project 2017-01-072. An operating permit application is being reviewed under project 2017-01-074, and will be updated internally to include this amendment. NSPS UU and 000 applicability for the pile and limestone mill system are unchanged. CertainTeed Corporation requested confidentiality for design capacity and annual throughputs according to 10 CSR 10-6.210. The Air Pollution Control Program granted confidentiality. This is the redacted public permit version. A confidential version is available under project 2018-10-052.

l~ a+f Recyded paper

Mr. Mark Hyde Page Two

T bl 1 E . . a e m1ss1ons s ummary (t ) [py DeMinimis

Pollutant Level/ SMAL

PM 25.0

PM10 15.0

PM2s 10.0

SO2 40.0

NOx 40.0

voe 40.0

co 100.0 Lead 0.6

Fluorides excluding HF 3.0

Sulfuric acid mist 7.0

Hydrogen sulfide 10.0

Total reduced sulfur 10.0

Reduced sulfur compounds 10.0

GHG (CO2e) NIA GHG (mass) NIA

Combined HAPs 25.0

Hexane 10.0

Combined POM 10.0

POM 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.01

POM Phenanthrene 0.01

Benzene 2.0

1,3 Butadiene 0.07

Chlorine 0.1

Ethylbenzene 10.0

Formaldehyde 2.0

Hydrogen Chloride 10.0

Toluene 10.0

Xylene 10.0 NIA= Not Applicable; N/D = Not Determined

Original Project Amended Potential Project Potential

Emissions Emissions

4.97 6.69

4.02 4.75

3.64 3.76

0.05 0.05

3.44 3.44

0.19 0.19 2.89 2.89 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA

4,146.9 4,146.9

4,122.5 4,122.5

0.065 0.065

0.062 0.062

2.40£-05 2.40£-05

8.24£-07 8.24£-07

5.84£-07 5.84£-07

7.21£-05 7.21£-05

NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA

2.58£-03 2.58£-03

NIA NIA 1.17£-04 1.17£-04

NIA NIA

Other individual HAPs are potentially emitted by the existing installation and project.

If you were adversely affected by this permit decision, you may be entitled to pursue an appeal before the administrative hearing commission pursuant to Sections 621.250 and

Mr. Mark Hyde Page Three

643.075.6 RSMo. To appeal, you must file a petition with the administrative hearing commission within thirty days after the date this decision was mailed or the date it was delivered, whichever date was earlier. If any such petition is sent by registered mail or certified mail, it will be deemed filed on the date it is mailed; if it is sent by any method other than registered mail or certified mail, it will be deemed filed on the date it is received by the administrative hearing commission, whose contact information is: Administrative Hearing Commission, United States Post Office Building, 131 West High Street, Third Floor, P.O. Box 1557, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, phone: 573-751-2422, fax: 573-751-5018, website: www.oa.mo.gov/ahc.

If you have any questions regarding this amendment, please do not hesitate to contact David Little, at the department's Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or at (573) 751-4817. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Kendall B. Hale Permits Section Chief

KBH:dlj

Enclosures

c: St. Louis Regional Office PAMS File: 2018-10-051

Installation:

ID: Calculation Date:

Project Description:

Emissions Summary _(tpy):

Pollutant PM PMlO PM2.5 S02 NOx voe co Lead Fluorides excluding HF SAM H2S TRS RSC GHG mass GHG C02e Combined HAPs Hexane

Certain Teed Jonesburg

139-0052

11/1/2018 amendment to permit 122017-008 to increase limestone mill design rate from xx to xx tph no change in pile limit of xxxxxx tpy in permit 122017-008A no change in control device airflow

Receiving, de minimis

Mill,Silo, Amended Original /SMAL

Pile, etc Combustion Haul roads Project PTE Project PTE (tpy) 5.58 0.07 1.05 6.69 4.97 25

4.28 0.26 0.21 4.75 4.02 15

3.45 0.26 0.05 3.76 3.64 10

0.05 0.05 0.05 40

3.44 3.44 3.44 40

0.19 0.19 0.19 40

2.89 2.89 2.89 100 0.00 0.00 0.6

0.00 0.00 3 0.00 0.00 7

0.00 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 10 0.00 0.00 10

4122.51 4122.51 4122.51

4146.85 4146.85 4146.85 75000

0.06 0.06 0.06 25

0.06 0.06 0.06 10

project

exceeds?

2018-10-051.xlsx

Summary

Page 1 of 14

Emission Unit

UL3

DPS

DPS

DP9

TK-1530

DP7

LMILll

bin vent

5PL

SPWind

5PL

Emission

Point

DP6

5-46

I

,<Wal ao1e

MHDR Emission Emissions

MHDRtrue bottlenecked Emission Factor Emission Factor bottlenecked Description (tph) (tph) Pollutant Factor Units Source (lb/hr) truck unloading limestone to receiving pit/vibrating conveyor xx PM xx lb/ton 0.000948244

PMlO xx lb/ton 0.000347689 PM2.5 xx lb/ton 9.82601E-05

Control Capture Control PTE true Device Efficiency Efficiency (lb/hr) none

PTE

bottlenecked (lb/hr)

0.000948244 0.000347689 9.82601E-05

2018-10-051.xlsx

Receiving, Mill, Silo, Pile,etc Page 2 of 14

PTE

bottlenecked (tpy)

0.004153309 0.00152288

0.000430379

drop from pit/vibrating conveyor to belt conveyor 1: stack emissions xx PM xx lb/ton 0.108 tilter CTRL 0.5 0.995 0.00027 0.0011826 PMlO xx lb/ton 0.0396 16A (FLT- 0.5 0.995 9.9E-05 0.00043362 PM2.5 xx lbLton 0.011191304 15103) 0.5 0.99 5.59565E-05 0.00024509

using grain loading ca!c method results in higher combined fugitive/stack emissions than the uncontrolled emission unit itself, therefore grain loading method not used at 5-46. 99.5%, 99.5%, and 99% control are permit section defaults.

I drop from pit/vibrating conveyor to belt conveyor 1: fugitive emissions xx xx lb/ton 50% 0%

xx lb/ton 50% 0%

capture may be more than 50% but using reduced value results in less monitoring xx lb/ton 50% 0% 0.0055956521 0.024508957

15-47 I drop from belt conveyor 1 to belt conveyor 2 xx xx xx lbLton 0.108

15-49 I transfer from belt conveyor 2 into storage silo A, and silo A itself xx

acfm[xx I

15-50 !drop from silo A to screen, and screen itself I !xx

5-50 transfer to the mill, and milling itself xx xx

acfm[xx I

5-52 transfer from mill to existing silos, new bin vent on existing silo 2 (TK-1520) xx

adm[xx

I jtruck dump to pile 1xx

I I pi!e wind erosion I 1xx

I I front end loader drop from pile to receiving pit I !XX

confirmed on phone call 9/25/17, silo A and silo 2 are xx gr/cf instead of xx.

xx lb/ton xx 1_1,/ton 0.011191304

xx Jl'/dsct I I o.042857143 xv

IPM2.5 IXX

I I lgr/dscf I I 0.0428571431 filter CTRL-16, controlled emission _![r£dscf 0.042857143 factor

I PMlO

~ emits with mil! and d_!Y_er

PM xx gr/dscf I I 0.582857143 PMlO xx

IPM2.5 !XX

I I lgr/dscf I I 0.5828571431 filter CTRL-18, controlled emission gr/dscf 0.582857143 factor

PM xx 0.117857143 XY I I lgr/dscf I I 0.1178571431 filterCTRL-20, controlled emission

gr/dscf 0.117857143 factor

lb/ton lb/ton lb/ton

lb/yr/acre lb/yr/acre

lbjyr/acre

lb/ton lb/ton lb/ton

0.3393589991none 0.160507635 0.024305442

none

0.0006226651 none 0.000228311 6.45225E-05

_e_ile silt %I 1.60% acres1xx

f, % time unobstructed wind speed> 12 mph at mean pile height 0.1 p, days/yr> 0.01" precip 105

0.0396 0.011191304! 0.049017913

0.042857143 0.187714286 0.042857143 0.187714286 0.042857143 0.187714286

0.582857143 2.552914286 0.582857143 2.552914286 0.582857143 2.552914286

0.117857143 0.516214286 0.117857143 0.516214286 0.117857143 0.516214286

0.339358999 1.486392415 0.160507635 0.70302344 0.024305442 0.106457835

0.122046336 0.061023168 0.009332955

0.000622665 0.002727273 0.000228311 0.001 6.45225E-05 0.000282609

sum PTE bottlenecked (tpy) PM 5.58290479 PMlO 4.284017965 PM2.5 3.447118594

xx mhdr (tph) xxxxxx tpy potential throughput of system

1.6 silt% permits default from AP-42 Table 13.2.4-1. f, approximation statewide

0.3963724 pile% of annual throughput xxxxxx amendment application requests 125,000 tpy p, AP-42 Chapter 13.2.1 application's mill mhdr is xx tph, however manufacturer statement says up to xx tph. application annual throughput xxxxxxx tpy based on xx tph and xxxx hrs. However I can't recreate xxxxx using yy x yyyy.

U, wind speed mph 9.52 columbia, mo. 1984 to 2016. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/search M, moisture content 0.7% permits default from AP-42 table 13.2.4-1 crushed limestone

"WRAP Fugitive Dust Handbook" Western Governors' Association, prepared by Countess Environmental, 9/7/2006, Chapter 9. Storage Pile Wind Erosion, Section 9.3 Emission Estimation: Alternate Methodology

MHDR Emission Emission (MM Btu/hr MHDR Unit Point Description input) (MMcf/hr) F-4300 5-50 limestone dryer xx xx

emits with mill at S-50, through filter CTRL-18

application deletes all combustion particulate as part of filter gram loading

Natural Gas HHV (Btu/cf) pcm 1020 porn

porn porn porn porn porn

porn pcm pcm pcm

porn porn

porn porn

porn porn

porn

porn

100yr GWP 40 CFR 98 Table A-1, Jan 1

2014

CO2! 1 CH4J 25 N20I 298

Natural gas HHV of 1,020 Btu/cf cited from AP-42 Section 1.4, July 1998.

Pollutant

PM filterable PMlO PM2.5 502 NOx voe co Combined HAPs POM aggregate group

2-Methylnaphthalene

3-Methylchloranthrene 7,12-Dimethy!benzanthracene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthy!ene Anthracene

Benzanthracene

Benzene Benzo(a )pyrene Benzo(b )fluoranthene Benzo(g,h,i )perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Butane

Chrysene Dibenzo(a,h )anthracene Dichlorobenzene

Ethane

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Formaldehyde Hexane

lndeno(l,2,3-cd )pyrene Naphthalene Pentane

Phenanathrene

Propane

Pyrene

Toluene

Arsen·1c

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Chromium

Cobalt Copper

Manganese

Mercury

Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Vanadium

Zinc

CO2 Methane

N2O GHG (mass) GHG (C02e)

Dichlorobenzene group CAS 25321-22-6 conservatively assumed as 100% 1,4-dich!orobenzene CAS 106-46-7.

Emission Emission Availao1e Factor (lb/ Factor Source Pollutant Control

CAS HAP? mmcf) (5CC) (lb/hr) Device 0.014901961 none 0.059607843 none

0.0S9607843 none

0.011764706 none

0.784313725 none 0.043137255 none 0.658823529 none

0.014807515 none 5.47608E-06 none

91-57-6 y 1.88235E-07 none

56-49-5 y 1.41176E-08 none 57-97-6 y 1.2549E-07 none 83-32-9 y 1.41176E-08 none 203-96-8 y 1.41176E-08 none 120-12-7 y 1.88235E-08 none 56-55-3 y 1.41176E-08 none 71-43-2 y l.64706E-05 none 50-32-8 y 9.41176E-09 none 205-99-2 y 1.41176E-08 none 191-24-2 y 9.41176E-09 none 205-82-3 y 1.41176E-08 none 106-97-8 0.016470588 none 218-01-9 y 1.41176E-08 none

S3-70-3 y 9.41176E-09 none

25321-22-6 y 9.41176E-06 none 74-84-0 0.024313725 none

206-44-0 y 2.35294E-08 none 86-73-7 y 2.19608E-08 none

50-00-0 y 0.000588235 none 110-54-3 y 0.014117647 none 193-39-5 y 1.41176E-08 none 91-20-3 y 4.78431E-06 none 109-66-0 0.020392157 none

85-01-8 y 1.33333E-07 none

74-98-6 0.012S4902 none

129-00-0 y 3.92157E-08 none

108-88-3 y 2.66667E-05 none

7440-38-2 y 1.56863E-06 none

7440-39-3 3.45098E-05 none

7440-41-7 y 9.41176E-08 none

7440-43-9 y 8.62745E-06 none

7440-47-3 y l.09804E-05 none

7440-48-4 y 6.58824E-07 none 7440-50-8 6.66667E-06 none 7439-96-5 y 2.98039E-06 none 7439-97-6 y 2.03922E-06 none 7439-98-7 8.62745E-06 none

7440-02-0 y 1.64706E-05 none 7782-49-2 y 1.88235E-07 none 7440-62-2 1.80392E-05 none

7440-66-6 0.000227451 none

941.1764706 none

0.018039216 none

0.017254902 none

PTE (lb/hr) 0.014902

0.0596078 0.0596078 0.0117647 0.7843137 0.0431373 0.6588235

0.0148075 5.476E-06 1.882E-07 1.412E-08 l.25SE-07 1.412E-08 1.412E-08 l.882E-08 1.412E-08 1.647E-05 9.412E-09 1.412E-08 9.412E-09 1.412E-08

0.0164706 1.412E-08 9.412E-09 9.412E-06 0.0243137 2.353E-08 2.196E-08

0.0005882 0.0141176 1.412E-08 4.784E-06

0.0203922 1.333E--07 0.012549

3.922E-08 2.667E-05 1.569E-06 3.451E-05 9.412E-08 8.627E-06 1.098E-05 6.588E-07 6.667E-06

2.98E-06 2.039E-06 8.627E-06 1.647E-05 1.882E-07 1.804E-05

0.0002275 941.17647 0.0180392 0.0172549

PTE (tpy) 0.0652706 0.2610824 0.2610824 0.0515294 3.4352941 0.1889412 2.8856471 0.0648569 2.399E-05 8.245E-07 6.184E-08 5.496E-07 6.184E-08 6.184E-08 8.245E-08 6.184E-08 7.214E-05 4.122E-08 6.184E-08 4.122E-08 6.184E-08 0.0721412 6.184E-08 4.122E-08 4.122E-05

0.1064941 1.031E-07 9.619E-08 0.0025765 0.0618353 6.184E-08 2.096E-05

0.0893176 5.84E-07

0.0549647 1.718E-07

0.0001168 6.871E-06

0.0001S12 4.122E-07 3.779E-05 4.809E-05 2.886E-06

0.0000292 l.305E-05 8.932E-06 3.779E-05 7.214E-05 8.245E-07 7.901E-05

0.0009962 4122.3529 0.0790118 0.0755765 4122.5075

4146.85

2018-10-051.xlsx

Dryer Combustion

Page 3 of 14

~~ (lb/mm_t:!L S:-~~~s-~ulfur per sci ~sjt:f AP-421 .2:.§.1.__ 2000 1000000 0.002

40 CFR 72.2 1.5 0.5 100 0.005 site specific #VALUE! fill in fill in #VALUE!

Turbine natural gas emission factor obtained from AP-42 Table 3.1-2a {0.94*5 lb/MM Btu), 40 CFR 72.2

"pipeline natural gas# definition of 0.5 grains or less of total sulfur per 100 SCF (S = 1.62E--03), natural gas

density of 0.044 lb/CF, and HHV of 1,020 Btu/CF, The

result is 1.56 lb/MMCF. However all natural gas

combustion types should have the same emission factor regardless of the type as long as there is good

combustion. S02 is based upon fuel sulfur content. AP-42 Table 1.4-2 says based on 2,000 grains per

MMCF, and to convert based upon rat'10 of

concentrations (0.005 gr/cf/ 0.002 gr/cf). The 0.6

TruckTyp<"s Activity jlon</hr) ll<ips/h,) <em, loader typ<" .,. lruckreceMngt<lp,t truckreceJ\lingtop,le ;<l(

loaderarpiletop,t

T1uckType

l<l~der type ,,.

We(ton<) Wfjtons) fr<lmapplkabon c<lnftrm...t h<lb<:at style l<lade1, ph<ln" call 9/25/17 estimated 11900 lb< empty fr<lm deere web<lte, H cu ft bucket, 2700 lb</yd hmestone

Road Segment IC O 30 D<lneway(lee!) 57414 442908 49.212 541332 541332 393696 4101 6003864 191<J76H 1377936 1099717 885816 41.8302 434706 6<J.717 6!18968 5112342 98424 6110766 49212 336282 262464 262464 123.8502 664362 53.313 41.01 803796 114.828 623352 48.39111 352686 Doneway(miles) 00108739 0.0083884 00093205 0.0102525 0.0102525 00074564 0007767 0011371 00363498 0.0260973 0.0397673 0.0167768 0.0079224 0.0082331 0.013204 0.0130486 0.0110292 0.0186409 0.012!''33 0009320S 0.006369 00049709 0.0049709 00234565 0.0125826 0.010097) 0007767 0,0152234 0.0217477 001180S9 00091651 0.0066797 00105632

Acllv,tles trurkre<:e!v1ngtop,1 3 3 3 3 3 lrudre<:e!vmgtop,le lo;,der,1tplletop11

trudrecelvmglopll !ruckrece,ving!opJle l<l3dera!p1le!<lp1\ w Surf.Ice

F(PM75)jlbs/VM11 fjPM10)(lb</VMT) fjPM30)(lbs/VMT) fextjPM2.5)jlbs/VMT) fo,,c![PMlO)jlb./VMT) Eed(PM30)11b</VMT)· truckrece;v,n8!<>p•! trudrecei111ngt<lp,le l<lad.,r a! p,I., t<l p,t

Mt!DR(VMT/h,)

PTF(lb/hr) PTEPM25(1b/hr) 00001806 00002165 0.0002405 0.0002646 0.0002646 00001924 00002004 00002934 0.000938 00006734 0.0010261 00004329 0.0002044 00002124 00003407 0.0003367 l'TfPM10(lb/hr) 0001l431 000088111 0.0009798 00010778 000107711 000071139 00008165 00011954 0.0038213 0.0027435 0.0041806 0.0017637 0.0008328 0.0008655 00013881 0.0013717 PTEPM30(1b/hr) 00057156 00044092 0.0048991 0.005389 000S389 00039193 0.0040826 0.0059769 0.0191064 00137174 0.0209028 0.0088184 0.0041642 00043275 0.0069404 00068587

l'TE(tons/yrl'TEPM2 S(t<lns/y,) 0,001729 00009481 0.0010534 0.0011587 00011587 0.0008417 0.0008778 00012851 00041082 00029495 0.0044945 0.0018961 00008954 00009305 0.0014923 0.0014747 PHPM10(tons/yr) 00050069 00038624 00042916 0.0047208 00047208 00034333 0.0035763 0.0052357 00167372 00120165 0.01113108 0.0077249 00036479 00037909 0.0060798 0.0060082 l'TEPM30(toM/yr) 00250343 00193122 0.021458 0.0236038 00236038 00171664 0.0178817 0.0261787 0.0836862 0.0600824 0.0915541 00386244 0,01112393 0.0189546 0.0303988 0.0300412

The,., .s no added c<lnl<<ll % for clean,ng paved ,oods, but th~ sl d~crea,es

st ol 2 0 g/m2 1s a«umed for l,ght ;ndustry (...:rep Im"'" fug,live mater,als such as gra,n, aggregale, ro;,I, etc may have higher sl) st low.,, than 1 0 can be used with a prm,it llmlt, dean Ins, and testing required unp.,ved control for "8MP"' Is 90%, 90%, 74% For undocumented wa!efmg,. 50%. 50%, 411% PM, PMl0, PM2.5 respect111ely

r:,tes\om<ldehng24hrma,throughput(lb/hr) ratest<lm<>del,ngannualth,,,ughput(lb/hr) pav<'d w/o rain paved withra1n pav...twlthc<lntrnl reducedsl,w/oram pavedw,th,,educedsl,w/<l<ain

unpaved w/ornin unpaved w,thram unpavedwilhron!rol <<lntr<lll...tw/<lrain unpavedwl cont,olledw/or;»n

tpyrate<t<lperm,ll'Tfannualthmughput paved with,am paved with control reducedsl,w/<l<ajn unpaved w,thum unpavPdwilticontrol cantroll.-dw/oraio

l<lp.,,lt<lnoutanactiv1ty,norde,t<laddtoacomposileem.ssi<lnfacl<lr" apply this equat,on to each segment th~t the aeflvity lf.avels ()n and sum the resull.S: MHDR' / MHDR!VMT/hr) x PTE(lb/hrl thendN,debythatact1vlty'sMH0R(!ph)togellb/lonemiss,onbct01

Paved Paved Paved

0 00002004 0.0003928 0.0005612 00003046 0.0002365 0.0001724 00002726 o o.0008165 o.0016004 0.0022862 00012411 o.0009635 0.0001022 00011105 00.00408260.0080018001143120.006205500048174 0.00351100055523 0 0.0008778 00017205 0.0024579 00013343 0.0010358 00007549 000119311 00.0035763 000700960.0100137 0005436 0.0042201 0.00307560.0048638 0 0.0178817 003504810.05006860.0271801 00211004 0.01537112 0.0243191

2018-10-051.xlsx

Haul Roads

PagE!4of14

[ , !.

~ ••

Haul Road/Haul Truck/Mater!al Hauled Information Haul Road II 0 1 2 W(tons) sl(g/m"2)· p 105 105 105 N· 365 365 365

Haul Roads - Max Hourly VMT Rate and Emission Factor Calculations E(PM2.S)(lbs/VMT)· E(PM10)(1bs/VMT) E(PM30)(1bs/VMT)· Eext(PM2.S)(lbs/VMT)· Eaxt(PMlO){lbs/VMT)· Eext(PM30) (lbs/VMT)·

E"k(sl)"091 "{W)"l02where· E"partlculateemissmnfactor(ha111ngunltsmatchingtheunitsofk) k"parttdl!s1zemultiplil!rforparticles1urangl!andunitsoflnternst sl,,roadsurfacesiltloading(gramspersquarl!meter)(g/m"2) w"averagewelght(tons)oftheveh1clestravelingtheroad

3

105 365

Table 13.21-1 PARTICLE S!ZE MULTIPLIERS FOR PAVED ROAD EQUATION Sizerange k(lb/VMT) PM2 5 0.00054 PM10 0.0022 PM15 0.0027 PM30 0.011

Eext" (k(sL)"0.91 • (W)"l.02](1-P/(4N)) where· k,sl,WandSareasdeflnedaboveand Eext:annual averageemlssionfactorinthesameunitsask

4

105 365

P " number of "wet" days with at least 0.01 inch of precipitation during the averaging period N :numberofdays!ntheaverag1ngper!od(365forannual)

5 6 7 8 9 10

105 105 105 105 105 105 365 365 365 365 365 365

The equations retain the quallty rating of A (D for PM2.S), tf applied withir, the rar,ge of source conditions that were tested in developing the equation as follows· Silt loading·

0.03-400 g/m2 D04-570gra!ns/square foot(ft2)

Mean vehicle weight 1.8-38megagrams(Mg) 2.0-42tons

Mean vehicle speed· 1·88k.1lometersperhour(kph) 1·55mllesperhour(mph)

The upper 95% conf!derice levels of equation 1 for PM10 is best described with equatmns usmg an exponent of 1.14 for silt loading and an exponent of 1.19 for weight E95%-,,k(sl)"1.14°(W)"l.19

E95%(PM2 0.012922 0.012922 0.012922 O 012922 0.012922 0.012922 E95%(PM1C 0.052646 0.052646 0052646 0.0S2646 0.052646 0.052646

11 12 13

105 105 105 365 365 365

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365

23 24 25 26 27

105 105 105 105 105 365 365 365 365 365

28 29

105 105 365 365

2018-10-051.xlsx

Paved Road

Page 7of14

30 31

105 105 365 365

t

Haul Road/Haul Truck/Material Hauled Information Haul Road I[ 0 1 2 3 4 W (tons): s{%): P (days): 105 105 105 105 105 E{PM2.5) (lb

E(PM10) (lbi E(PM30) (lbi Eext(PM2.5) Eext(PMl0) Eext(PM30)

E = k (s/12)"a * (W/3)"b where: E = size-specific emission factor (lb/VMT) s = surface material silt content{%) W = mean vehicle weight (tons)

Constants for Equation Constant

Particle Size k(lb/VMT) a PM2.5 0.15 PM10 1.5 PM30 4.9

0.9 0.9 0.7

b 0.45 0.45 0.45

Eext = E[(365-P)/365] where E is defined above and: Eext = annual size-specific emission factor extrapolated for natural mitigation (lb/VMT) P = number of days in a year with at least 0.01 inch of precipitation

5 6

105 105

7

105

2018-10-051.xlsx

Unpaved Road

Page 10 of 14

Segment# 0 1 2 3

X Dimension

Y Dimension 17.5 13.S 15 16.S

42 43 44 45

19.25 18.5 38.75

35

87 88 89 90

50.1

44 115 126

15

1536

t•

11

12

13

;::+;·:f~~Ol~tr~ ~eleaSe"'P-Oii:tt .Ueflate. ',.,_ • -'" ,)•fi¥•.f<''::,o·,

• 5 e 7

"

zr 53

24 25:,e il4

-

llf!

il:l 82 $1

'.le

"' rt

7ll '00

79

llf!

00 89 Legend

• Storage PHe Center:

00 " Fugitive Locations

O"P!k":

' 00

'5T

e< • Stack Locations

'i=lnal Haur'Roact Route

C=:J Storage Pile Foolprinl

5$ , ;':'~~'" ef.L e:t - Railcar

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

12.5

16.5 12 12.5 18.3 58.5 42 64 27 12.75 13.25 21.25 21 17.75 30 20.75 15 10.25 8 8 37.75 20.25 16.25 24.5 35 19 14.75 10.75 17 20 17.5

46 47 48 49 so 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76

15 10 46.S 36.25 25.25 12.5 15 25 23.5 53.75 9.75 9.5 10

25 16.5 39 86 17.8 27 21 27 23 16 71.5 125 22 47 34 36.25 26 35

91 92 93 94 95 96 assumed segment 56 ls equivalent distance for a truck receiving to pile and loader from pile to pit, even if they don't travel on the exact segment 56

so 50

20 46 60 36

35 Sb 31 38 39 40

19 23 24.75

25.5 19 28.25

77 78 79 80 81 82

49.5 22

62 60 40 95

41

21.5

83

27

2018-10-051.xlsx

Road Segments Page 11 of 14

84 85 86

44 44 44

2018-10-051.xlsx

Road Segments Page 12 of 14

o.e_t·1on 1 ~,---~ .. ~ Emission Permit

Unit Description status uu 000 Ul3 truck unloadinR: limestone to receivine cit new X

DPB drop from oit to belt conveyor 1 new X

DP9 droo from belt conveyor 1 to belt convevor 2 new X

TK-1530 transfer from belt convevor 2 into storae:e silo A, and silo A itself new X

~ ...... ~,, - ....... ,~ .. ~

uu 000 uu 000 X

X

either X

either X

... .,., ..... ~

uu 000 X

X

X

X

unloadmgfromacarrierisUU,notsubJect\oOOO

sn'I a conveyor transfer point, so still UU unloading from earner, not subject to 000 Downsiream of atfected UU umt

conveyor transfer point~o could be either, however 111s part of the new NMPP so 000

llo so could be either, however it 1s part of new NMPP so 000. Being downstream from a UU unit 1s Irrelevant.

2018-10-051.xlsx

NSPS 000, UU

Page 13 of 14

DP7 drop from silo A to screen, and screen itself new

LMllll transfer to the mill, and millini! itself new

S-52 transfer from mill to existing silos, new bin vent on existin" silo 2 ITK~1520) new X

X X

X X

either X

X

X

X

UU is only handling and storage, not crusher or screen. So UU doesn't apply to these, but 000 specifically does. Being downsiream ofatfected UU unit 1s irrelevant

UU ,sonly handling and storage, not crusher or screen. So UU doecsn't apply to these, but 000 specifically does. Being downsiream of affected UU unit 1s irrelevant

silo so could be either, however rt ;5 being installed for the new NMPP so assume 000

SPL truck dump to pile new X either

SPWind • pile wind erosion new

SPL front end loader droo from oi!e to receivinll pit new X either

TK-1510 Pneumatic limestone receivinl! and silo 1 existin£1' X either TK-1520 Pneumatic limestone receiving and silo 2 existing X either

TK-1610 Limestone cold filler bin existine X either U-1605 limestone fluidized bed heater existing X either

TK-1602 limestone hot filler bin existinP X either

Ru!e applicability: UU Mineral handling and storage facility means the areas in asphalt roofing plants in which minerals are unloaded from a carrier,

the conveyor transfer points between the carrier and the storage silos, and the storage silos.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

000 Nonmetallic mineral processing plant means any combination of equipment that is used to crush or grind any nonmetallic mineral wherever located,

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

unloadingfromacamer1sUU, notsubjecttoOOO

none,1sn'tas1lo

unload1ngfrom a camer 1s UU, not sub1ect to ooo

wasalreadysubJecttouu

wasalreadysubJect!oUU

wasalreadysubJecttoUU

was already subject to UU

wasalreadysubJecttoUU

including lime plants, power plants, steel mills, asphalt concrete plants, portland cement plants, or any other facility processing nonmetallic minerals except as provided in §60.670 (bl and (c). The provisions of this subpart are applicable to the following affected facilities in fixed or portable nonmetallic mineral processing plants:

Options:

each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or rallcar loading station. Truck dumping of nonmetallic minerals into any screening operation, feed hopper, or crusher is exempt from the requirements of this section.

"An affected facility that is subject to the provisions of subparts For I of this part or that follows in the plant process any facility subject to the provisions of subparts For! of this part is not subject to the provisions of this subpart." could follow this logic for LIU replacing For I?

1 only LIU applies because this is a "mineral handling and storage facility"? Screen, mill, and wind erosion seem exempt from ULI. 2 hybrid. If this option is correct, then what rule/limits apply to the "either" equipment? 3 only 000 applies, because the equipment is "wherever located"? Truck dumping into the receiving pit is exempt, but not loader drop.

4 another hybrid, after asking Region 7. "In my view, the facility revisions, to include on-site limestone milling, is subject to subpart 000 up to the point where the milled limestone enters the transfer point(s) on its way to the storage silos; and the provisions of subpart ULI would apply from that point on. This is also how the interaction with Subparts F and l is being interpreted,"

surfacing

emission unit B-1 B-2 FLT-5870 H-1 H-2 blow still 1,3 butadiene 0.13 0.01 benzene 0.15 0.15 9.63 0.22 0.22 0.28 formaldehyde 5.38 5.38 166.44 7.88 7.88 0.11 hexane 129.08 129.08 63.94 189.22 189.22 2340.39 toluene 0.25 0.25 0.36 0.36 71.09 cos 385.44 35.54 chlorine 44.67 390.98 ethylbenzene 7.35 355.44 hcl 11.38 8175.13 xylene 71.09

office

water cooling

heater air makeup coater section 4.69 92.97

0.11 0.09 64.22 129.39 4.24 3.22 0.89 139.84

101.88 77.26 17.38 0.19 0.14 177.72 152.6

104.75 270.47 60.85

2 175.19 32.77 59.78 202.6 175.19

total (lbs) 97.8

204.46 341.26

3237.45 402.96

796.2 496.5

539.98 8279.06

448.88

2018-10-051.xlsx

2016 EIQ HAPs

Page 14 of 14

total (tons) 0.0489

0.10223 0.17063

1.618725 0.20148

0.3981 0.24825 0.26999 4.13953 0.22444

the purpose of this tab is to sum actual emissions of individual haps as reported in 2016 eiq for presentation in the permit's emission summary table, no comment on accuracy other haps are reported in the eiq