24
2009-2010 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives Title II, Part D program as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, CFDA Number 84.386

Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

  • Upload
    bracha

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2009-2010 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives. Title II, Part D program as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, CFDA Number 84.386. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

2009-2010 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Enhancing Education through Technology Grant:

Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives

Title II, Part D program as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, CFDA Number 84.386

Page 2: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

• Regional Application• Calhoun ISD as

fiscal agent– Barry ISD– Berrien RESA– Branch ISD– Eaton ISD– Hillsdale ISD– Jackson County ISD– Lenawee ISD– Livingston– Macomb ISD– Gratiot-Isabella RESD– Washtenaw ISD

Page 3: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)
Page 4: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)
Page 5: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Key Attributes

• Existing data warehousing systems– DataDirector and Michigan’s Data for Student

Success (Data4SS)

• Professional learning around– analyzing State data– analyzing school data– analyzing student work– monitoring classroom achievement

Page 6: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Enhancements for DataDirector

• Additional pre-built reports

• Expanded sharing of customized reports

• Stronger item bank content alignment

• Additional features for compliance reporting

Page 7: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Common Formative and Summative Assessments

• Curriculum alignment

• Efficacy of teacher practice

• Successful professional development

• Successful student intervention strategies

Page 8: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Principal Leadership

• Classroom observations supported by data

• Selection of professional development

• Shared leadership with PLCs

• Effective use of time

Page 9: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Project Design of Professional Development

• Training on data tools

• Two-day summer institutes

• A minimum of two days of local PLC professional development each year.

Page 10: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

MAISA Role• Overarching “professional learning community” to develop:

– Interfacing Regional Data Initiatives with the Data for Student Success (D4SS) project

– Interfacing Regional Data Initiatives with district student information systems

– Developing common professional development programs – Recommending a common set of state and national course definitions to

improve the transmission of secondary credit information across the K12 system and between K12 and higher education.

– Facilitating research relationships with teacher preparation institutions. – Purchasing and sharing of tools and resources for differentiated

instruction. – Developing a common set of reports to assist schools in identifying

those students most at risk of dropping out that will help facilitate schools in addressing and lowering dropout rates based on the early warning sign research (http://www.betterhighschools.org/topics/DropoutWarningSigns.asp)

– Evaluating the impact of Regional Data Initiatives in terms of instructional impact.

• First meeting occurs November 19 and 20

Page 11: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Breakdown of Grant Monies

• The LISD expects to receive $122,400 by January 15, 2010.– $12,000 assigned to purchase item bank questions

for interim course assessments (formative) aligned to secondary priority standards

– $110,400 assigned to professional development for increasing the capacity of our data warehouse initiative

• Summer Damp Camp stipends, food, and resources• Stipends, food, and resources for development of

performance assessments (summative) aligned to secondary priority expectations

Page 12: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

1. We will incorporate the Regional Data Initiative program into our educational practices at the classroom level. – Each building has a Data Team, capable of

producing reports in DataDirector.– The LISD will continue to support increasing

the capacity of data roles.

Page 13: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

2. We will provide software interface capability between the Regional Data Initiatives and our student information system to facilitate the interchange of data. – eSchool Plus is our source for demographic

data for our student-based data warehouse

Page 14: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

 3. We will dedicate at least four professional development days over two school years for all instructional staff and administrators for professional development related to the use of data to improve instruction.

– We will work with your data team to implement a schedule that will impact all of your instructional staff and administrators.

Page 15: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

4. We will participate in the Regional Data Initiative during the FY2009-10, FY2010-11, and FY2011-12 school years.– We expect to continue the consortium

agreements beyond our current three year agreement. 

Page 16: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

5. We will fully participate in the collective evaluation of the Regional Data Initiatives Title IID grant program, including completing surveys and providing additional information to assist in determining program effectiveness and impact on student achievement. – We have been collecting survey information and

sharing results with you. – We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of our

data warehouse initiative.

Page 17: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

 6. We give permission to the Regional Data Initiative to use district data for research purposes of improving education policy and practice and the preparation of teachers. – We will be working with our research partner,

Central Michigan University.

Page 18: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

 7. We agree to using or aligning with a common set of standards to determine personnel technology skill level with all instructional staff observed and report these determinations in the Registry of Educational Professionals (REP) as required.– We will deliver online courses for teachers on

“21things for the 21st Century Educator”.

Page 19: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

LEA Assurance

 8. We agree to using or aligning with a common set of standards to determine the technological literacy of all 8th grade students and report these assessment results in the Michigan Electronic Grants System (MEGS) as required.– At present, this addendum was not funded.

Page 20: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

Next Steps by November 30

• All districts who wish to participate must have their level 5 MEGS person complete the assurances process–Once in the Title II, Part D ARRA grant:

• Click on ‘Grant Consortium Acceptance Form’• Click ‘Accept the invitation and assurances above’

button

–No response means you are not participating

Page 21: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)
Page 22: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

• Click on “Grant Consortium Acceptance Information”

• Do not click “Assurances”

Page 23: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)
Page 24: Michigan Data Director Consortium (MDDC)

[Either / Or]