MIWP 5 – Validation and conformity testing

Update and statusMarch 2015

• SubTask 1.2 - Define process and governance of validation and conformity testing (INSPIRE testing maintenance framework). Manage by Peter Parslow UK (10 people)

• SubTask 1.3 - Investigate feasibility of setting up a compliance certification facility and process similar to OGC CITE or other rate system. Manage by Giacomo Martirano IT (3 p.)

• SubTask 1.4 - Establish INSPIRE testing maintenance framework based on results of 1.2. Manage by Peter Parslow and Carlo Cipolloni UK-IT (11 p.)

Task 1

• SubTask 2.1 - Define use cases for (a) commonly agreed validator(s) (for metadata, data and services) Manage by Christian Ansorge EEA(14 p.)

• SubTask 2.2 - Derive requirements (functional and non-functional) based on use cases.?? (14 p.)

• SubTask 2.3 - Collect information on existing validation tools/platforms and approaches, including languages/approaches for documenting tests. Manage by Daniela Hogrebe DE (8 p.)

• SubTask 2.4 - Evaluate existing tools/platforms and approaches on how they meet the requirements defined in 2.2. ?? (7 p.)

• SubTask 2.5 - Derive software/test development requirements based on results of 2.4. Manage by Ilkka Rinne DK (9 p.)

• SubTask 2.6 - Collect schema and schematron existing examples from Thematic cluster and proposed in MIWP-14. Manage by Robert Tomas JRC (all the TC Portal people)

Task 2

• SubTask 3.1 - Develop testsuite for INSPIRE metadata. Manage by Paul Hasenohr (13 p.)• New extraTask 3.1.3 - Map requirements in MD IR to

requirements in MD TG. Manage by Michael Lutz

• SubTask 3.2 - Develop testsuite for INSPIRE discovery service. ?? (4 p.) • New extraTask 3.2.3 - Map requirements in NS IR to

requirements in Discovery service TG. ??

• SubTask 3.3 - Develop testsuite for INSPIRE view service. Manage by Sven Böhme (6 p,)• New extraTask 3.3.3 - Map requirements in NS IR to

requirements in View Service TG. ??

• SubTask 3.4 - Develop testsuite for INSPIRE download service. ?? (6 p.)• New extraTask 3.4.3 - ap requirements in NS IR to

requirements in Download service TG. ??

• SubTask 3.5 - Investigate feasibility of testing INSPIRE data sets. Manage by Carlo Cipolloni (10 p.)

Task 3

35 staff applied

3 day x months

1 year of project

57 MM(1260 D/Y)

WP resources

AT CZ DE EEA ES FI FR IT JRC NL NO OGC PL RO SE SK UK

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

LMO/SDICUniversitySMEEUOther

+ Specific Expert Group (11 people) x 2 months

15 sub-Tasks and 30 sub-sub-tasks

Activities started

• First Release of Procedures for change Managment and control the ATSs, documentation, ETSs, software, etc

SubTask 1.2

• Collect information on existing validation tools/platforms and approaches, including languages/approaches for documenting tests

SubTask 2.3

• Collect schema and schematron existing examples from Thematic cluster SubTask 2.6

Activities started

• Develop testsuite for INSPIRE metadata:• ATS for Metadata Technical Guidance: almost all

39 requirements in the MD TG ready to be reviewed by the MIWP-5

SubTask 3.1

• Develop testsuite for INSPIRE view service:• ATS for View Services Technical Guidance - ISO

19128 profile: 25/75 requirements tested and ready for the MIWP-5 review

• ATS for View Services Technical Guidance - WMTS 1.0.0 profile: are tested 6/19 requirements, 6 are considered not mechanically testable or overlapping with other requirements

SubTask 3.3

Activities started

• Develop testsuite for INSPIRE download service:• ATS for Download Services Technical Guidance -

Pre-defined Atom Conformance Class: 4/45 were in draft stage and 5 have been evaluated as non-mechanically testable

• Suggestion about ATS for the WFS conformance class of the predefined dataset Download Service

• Suggestion about ATS for the WFS conformance class of the direct access Download Service

SubTask 3.4

• Dataset pilot case:• A pilot on Protect Site is started with EEA and

EPSIT for a schematron definition• A pilot on Natural Risk Zone is started with ISPRA

and EPSIT

SubTask 3.5