Upload
dangminh
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Modeling and Applications of Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI)
David Cuccia, Ph.DFounder and CEO – Modulated Imaging, Inc.
OutlineIntroduction – Modulated Imaging, Inc.
Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI)
Instrumentation
Spectral Imaging
Tomography
Computational Challenges in SFDI
Spatial Frequency Optimization
Wavelength Optimization
Profilometry
Tomographic Imaging
David Cuccia, Founder and [email protected]
Virtual Photonics Technology Initiative
Founded in 2005 by researchers at the Beckman Laser Institute, UC Irvine
Developing SFDI and other BLI technologies for commercialization
Interact with BLI researchers via grants and contracts
Significant interaction on advanced computational methods
Acknowledgements
Vasan Venugopalan
Jerome Spanier
Carole Hayakawa
Lisa Malenfant
Adam Garnder
Michele Martinelli
Janaka Ranasinghesagara
VP
Frederic Bevilacqua
Anthony Durkin
Bernard Choi
Bruce Tromberg
Ron Frostig
Gregory Evans
Soren Konecky
Amaan Mazhar
Rolf Saager
Amr Yafi
Michael Pharaon
SFDI Lab
NCRR: P41 RR 001192 NCRR: R43 RR 025985-01
Steve Saggese
Pierre Khoury
Frederick Ayers
MI Inc.
1: Quantify Absorption, Scattering and Fluorescence
Arm planar (DC)reflectance @ 600 nm
1cm 0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Quantitative optical absorption map µa (mm-1)
Challenges in Tissue Optics
Structured Illumination Measurement and SFD Modeling in Turbid Media
Nora Dognitz and Georges Wagnieres, Lasers Med. Sci. 13, 55 (1998).
Structured Illumination + Spatial Frequency Domain Analysis
M. A. A. Neil, R. Juskaitis, and T. Wilson, Opt. Lett. 22, 19057 (1997).
Spatial Frequency Domain Measurement in Diffractive Systems
David J. Cuccia, Frederic Bevilacqua, Anthony J. Durkin, and Bruce J. Tromberg, "Modulated imaging: quantitative analysis and tomography of turbid media in the spatial-frequency domain," Opt. Lett. 30, 1354-1356 (2005)
Spatial Frequency Domain Measurement and Analysis
X. Cheng and D. A. Boas, Opt. Express 3, 118 (1998)
Markel, V. and Schotland, J. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 1336-1347 (2001)
Spatial Frequency Domain Modeling in Turbid Media
Alwin Kienle, Michael S. Patterson, Nora Dögnitz, Roland Bays, Georges Wagnieres, and Hubert van den Bergh. Appl. Opt. 37, 779-791 (1998)
Fre
quency D
om
ain
Real D
om
ain
FT
(t)
FT
-1(ω
)
MT
F (ω
)
Time Frequency, ω (GHz)
PS
F (
t)
Time, t (ns)
Time-resolved
PS
F (ρ
)
Distance, ρ (mm)
Spatially-resolved
Measurement Approaches in Tissue Optics
Fre
quency D
om
ain
Real D
om
ain
FT
(t)
FT
-1(ω
)
MT
F (ω
)
Time Frequency, ω (GHz)
PS
F (
t)
Time, t (ns)
Time-resolved
MT
F (
k)
Spatial Frequency, k (mm-1)
FT
(ρ)
FT
-1(k
)
PS
F (ρ
)
Distance, ρ (mm)
Spatially-resolved
Measurement Approaches in Tissue Optics
Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI):
Platform and Measurement
x
z
y
lens
mirror
LCTF(10nm FWHM)
condenser
QTH lamp
spatial light modulator
NIR custom digital projector
tissue or phantom
CCD
Re
fle
cte
d In
ten
sity
position, x (mm)
( ) ( ) ( )1/ 2 1/ 2
2 2 2
1 2 2 3 3 1
2( )
3xiAC i f
M x I I I I I I = − + − + −
De
mo
du
late
d A
C
( )*cos(2 )OUT AC x DCI M x f x Iπ= + Φ +
0Φ = 2 / 3πΦ = 4 / 3πΦ =
Out
In
1 12 2cos(2 )IN xI f xπ= + Φ +
Inp
ut In
ten
sity
position, x (mm)
demod.MAC (x,y)240°120°0°
• Non-contact
• Scalable Field of View
• Consumer-grade electronics
Cuccia, et al., Opt Lett, 2005. 30: 1354-6.
1: Quantify Absorption and Scattering
Arm planar (DC)reflectance @ 600 nm
1cm 0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Quantitative optical absorption map µa (mm-1)
Challenges in Tissue Optics
Tissue: a low-pass spatial filter R
d(f
x)
Spatial Frequency, fx (mm-1)
µa, µs'
Cuccia et. al., Opt Lett, 30(11), 1354-1356 (2005)Cuccia et. al., J. Biomed. Opt. (2009)
Quantify optical properties
0
1
( ) 2 ( ) ( )n
d i i d i i
i
R k J k Rπ ρ ρ ρ ρ=
= ∆∑
( ) ( )
'
' '
3( )
1 3
s trd
eff tr eff tr
AR k
A
µ µ
µ µ µ µ=
+ +
( )1/ 2
' 2 2
'
1eff eff
eff
kµ µδ
= = +
2' 2
0 0 02( ) ( ) 3 ( )
eff tr
dz z q z
dzϕ µ ϕ µ− = −
• Diffusion Approximation
• Transport (Monte Carlo)
Tissue: a low-pass spatial filter
Cuccia et al, Opt Lett, vol. 30, pp. 1354-6, 2005.
Svaasand et al, Phys Med Biol, vol. 44, pp. 801-13, 1999.
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Spatial frequency (mm-1
)
Dif
fuse
Refl
ecta
nce
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Spatial frequency (mm-1
)
Dif
fuse
Ref
lect
an
ce
Liquid Phantom Experiments I:Absorption and Scattering Variation
Absorption Variation Experiment Scattering Variation Experiment
0.11 mm ≤ µs' ≤ 1.8 mm-
1
µa = 0.0049 mm-1
0.0011 mm-1 ≤ µa ≤ 0.12
mm-1
µs' = 0.97 mm-1
µs'/µa ≈
10
µs'/µa ≈
1000l* ≈ 0.5 mm
l* ≈ 9 mm
Pig Model of Venous Occlusion
Deoxy-hemoglobin (Hb) Map
During Venous Occlusion
Control Occluded
6 min = 1 sec of video
45 minutes actual time
Hb Concentration (µM)
Cortical Spreading Depression:Chromophore Maps vs. Time
Barrel Cortex (C2)Thinned Skull Preparation
1M K+Cl-
• 4 wavelengths (680,730,780, 830)
• 2 spatial frequencies (DC/AC)
• 6 sec/measurement for 35 min
Time Acquisition:
Multi-Spectral Flap Data - 12 Hours Post-Op
µa
(mm
-1)
µs′(m
m-1
)
Diffu
se
Re
fle
cta
nce
Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)
µa map, 650nm µs′ map, 650nmdiffuse reflectance map, 650nm
Other Benefits of Quantitative Tissue Assessment Fluorescence SFDI, Speckle SFDI
Reflectance SFDI
Quantitative Imaging of Absorption,
Scattering, and Chromophores
Speckle SFDI
Quantitative Imaging of Blood Flow
Fluorescence SFDI
Quantitative Imaging of
Extrinsic Contrast,
Quantum Yield
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Spatial frequency (mm-1
)
Dif
fuse
Refl
ecta
nce
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.30
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Spatial frequency (mm-1
)
Dif
fuse
Ref
lect
an
ce
Absorption Variation Experiment Scattering Variation Experiment
0.11 mm ≤ µs' ≤ 1.8 mm-
1
µa = 0.0049 mm-1
0.0011 mm-1 ≤ µa ≤ 0.12
mm-1
µs' = 0.97 mm-1
µs'/µa ≈
10
µs'/µa ≈
1000l* ≈ 0.5 mm
l* ≈ 9 mm
Computational Challenges I: Optimization Of Acquisition Frequencies
Computational Challenges I: Optimization Of Acquisition Frequencies
Outcome: 2 frequencies(RL - 4 pictures)
Computational Challenges II: Optimization Of Acquisition Wavelengths
Outcome: 2 wavelengths
x 2 frequencies
(RL: 8 pictures)
MI-derived 670nm absorption maps of a homogeneous hemispherical tissue phantom without (a) and with (b) profile-based reflectance calibration. (c) Corresponding absorption line profiles.
(a) (b) (c)
Computational Challenges III: Surface Profilometry Calibration/Correction
Outcome: 5 calibration sets
Tissue: a low-pass spatial filter R
d(f
x)
Spatial Frequency, fx (mm-1)
µa, µs'
Depth-resolvesignals
Quantify optical properties
absorbing object
2 mm below the surface
absorbing and scattering
object on the surface
2 mm
z
top view
cross-sectional view
siloxane
µa = 0.006 mm-1 µs’ = 1 mm-1
µa = Infbackground optical properties
µa = 0.003 mm-1 µs’ = 1 mm-1
absorbing object
2 mm below the surface
absorbing and scattering
object on the surface
2 mm
z
top view
cross-sectional view
siloxane
µa = 0.006 mm-1 µs’ = 1 mm-1
µa = Infbackground optical properties
µa = 0.003 mm-1 µs’ = 1 mm-1
Qualitative Tomography
L A M M P
raw
im
age
data
(A
C+
DC
)
modula
tion
images
derivative
sections
fx = 0 mm-1
δh = 10.53 mmfx = 0.0191 mm-1
δh = 10.32 mmfx = 0.0763 mm-1
δh = 8.21 mmfx = 0.5724 mm-1
δh = 1.72 mm
5 mm5 mm
Qualitative Tomography
Vivek Venugopal, Jin Chen, Frederic Lesage, and Xavier Intes, "Full-field time-resolved
fluorescence tomography of small animals," Opt. Lett. 35, 3189-3191 (2010)
Nicolas Ducros, Cosimo D’andrea, Gianluca Valentini, Tim Rudge, Simon Arridge, and
Andrea Bassi, "Full-wavelet approach for fluorescence diffuse optical tomography
with structured illumination," Opt. Lett. 35, 3676-3678 (2010)
Quantitative Optical Tomography
1 1
( , , ) ( , , )e x m y n
M Nik x ik y
x y m n m n
m n
k k z x y z x yϕ ϕ+
= =
= ∆ ∆∑∑
( )1/ 2
' 2 2
'
13eff a tr x y
eff
k kµ µ µδ
= = + +
2' 2
0 0 02( ) ( ) 3 ( )eff tr
dz z q z
dzϕ µ ϕ µ− = −
• Diffusion Approximation
• Transport (Monte Carlo)
Cuccia et al, Opt Lett, vol. 30, pp. 1354-6, 2005.Svaasand et al, Phys Med Biol, vol. 44, pp. 801-13, 1999.
( ) ( )0 1 2( , , ) exp expx y tr eff'k k z C z C zϕ µ µ= − + −
Green’s Functions in the SFD
( ),
3
,
exp( , , )
1
'eff pert pert
pert x y'eff pert e
z zk k z C
z
µϕ
µ
− −=
+
0 5 100
0.5
1
1.5
flu
en
ce
ra
te a
mp
litu
de
(no
rm)
depth
(z)
fx
= 0 mm-1
fx
= 0.05 mm-1
fx
= 0.1 mm-1
fx
= 0.15 mm-1
fx
= 0.2 mm-1
(demod)
240°
120°
0°
fx = 0.1 mm-1
Rd (x,y)
@ fx, ill
Multiple “Views”Frequency-dependent depth sensitivity
illumination frequency, fx, ill
, 0.2 mm-1
, …
…
…
…
… fx, ill
absorbing object
2D FFT
fx, ill
Rd (p,q)
p
qRd (x,y)
z
=
µa (pi,qi)
z
x
fx, ill fx, ill
Rd (pi,qi)Diff (fx, ill, z)@ pi,qi
Tomographic Inversion
Forward Model (@ each pi, qi)
z
=x
fx, ill
fx, ill
Rd (pi,qi)D-1 (z, fx, ill)
@ pi,qi
µa (pi,qi)
z
Inverse Model (@ each pi, qi)
fx, ill
x
y
1.9 mm
1.1 mm
Tomographic Reconstruction
0.2mm 1.0mm 1.8mm 2.4mm 3.2mm 4.0mm 4.8mm 5.6mm 6.4mm 7.2mm 8.0mm 8.8mm 9.6mm
Depth (mm)
Ongoing Work
Clinical Deployment
Multi-modality imaging (laser speckle, fluorescence)
Advanced modeling (acceleration, layers, tomography)