MTS-II Final Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    1/52

    Page | 1

    1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis study discusses the agricultural inputs and implications of the identify their marketing

    constraints and opportunities. A survey of 150 farmer was conducted in five different village

    maghnager block of Jhabua districts in MP .The major input marketing constraints that were

    identified in the study is that, lack of agricultural cultivation information, undulated topography,

    low soil depth, soil fertility, the absence of new technologies, information asymmetry between

    traders and producers, lack of formal contracting among informal, and formal producers and

    traders, lack of standardization and product quality, high costs of cultivation ,financial services

    and transportation costs. The major opportunities for increasing the efficiency of the marketing

    are the potentially to improved agricultural inputs like: HYV seed, fertilizer, labour , more use

    of bio fertilizer ,etc its multiplication and distribution, This paper also show that the exiting

    pattern of cultivation and cost involved the agricultural mechanism to reduce the same .

    There is the no proper marketing channel & to reduce the cost of cultivation we can form a

    producer company.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    2/52

    Page | 2

    2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTAt the outset, I feel great pleasure to pronounce my gratitude to Prof. L. K. Vaswani, Director,

    KSRM, KIIT University, for giving us the opportunity to participate in the MTS II Program by

    adding it to our course curriculum. I am thankful to Prof. Prasun Kr.Das, our MTS Coordinator

    KSRM, KIIT University, for his guidance and constant observation throughout the program.

    I am particularly thankful to Prof. Nandini Sen , Faculty Guide for their sincere guidance,

    constructive criticism and valuable suggestions in every step of this work.

    Special thanks to Mr. S.S.Rana, Zonal Program Manager for giving the opportunity to complete

    my final MTS II training in their Organization. And my immense gratitude to Mr. Deepak

    Sharma, Regional Program Manager for his able guidance during the study.

    This report could not have been prepared without the committed support of GVT staff. In

    particularly, I gratefully acknowledge time and effort invested by the farmers those who have

    participated in the survey for sharing their views and provided the valuable feedback on the

    program through the preparation of this report.

    Thank You

    Akramul Hoque

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    3/52

    Page | 3

    Table of Contents

    9 Demand estimation of Agriculture inputs in the target village ........................................... 23

    10 Market Linkage .............................................................................................................. 24

    10.1 Rural Marketing Pattern .......................................................................................... 26

    10.2 Supply Chain and Rural Marketing Network of Tribal Division ............................... 2710.3 Present Supply Chain of Rural Market ..................................................................... 27

    10.4 Some existing models of movement of farm produce from farm to market- ............. 28

    10.5 Value addition and marketing support................................................................ ...... 31

    10.6 Constraints in Rural Market ..................................................................................... 32

    10.7 Reasons for Improvement of Rural market of the tribal region ................................. 33

    10.8 Future Plans............................................................................................................. 33

    11 UNDERSTANDING PRODUCER COMPANY ............................................................ 34

    11.1 PRIMARY PRODUCE ........................................................................................... 3411.2 PRODUCER ........................................................................................................... 34

    11.3 PRODUCER INSTITUTION .................................................................................. 34

    11.4 PRODUCER COMPANY ....................................................................................... 34

    11.5 WHO CAN FORM PRODUCER COMPANY? ...................................................... 35

    11.6 CHARACTERISTICS OF PRODUCER COMPANY ............................................. 35

    12 Objects and Activities of Producer Company .................................................................. 35

    13 Stages of Project Development for producer company .................................................... 36

    13.1 Village study and preliminary identification ............................................................ 36

    13.2 Feasibility study ................................ ...................................................................... 36

    13.3 Report and action plan ............................................................................................. 37

    13.4 Organizing............................................................................................................... 37

    13.5 Formalizing ............................................................................................................. 37

    13.6 Registration certificate ............................................................................................. 38

    13.7 Business planning ................................ .................................................................... 39

    13.8 Linkages with other organizations ........................................................................... 39

    13.9 Monitoring and review ............................................................................................ 39

    14 Key Activities, Timeline, Deliverable and Measures of Verification ............................... 39

    14.1 Project Outcomes .................................................................................................... 41

    15 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 42

    16 Annexure- ...................................................................................................................... 44

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    4/52

    Page | 4

    3 INTRODUCTIONThe agriculture has potential to create economic growth in rural areas. It generates jobs

    opportunities in adding value (as in food processing industry), in bringing agriculture products to

    the customers (market linkage), and in providing support (infrastructure, information, quality

    control and training). Agriculture is still the mainstay of the State's economy, as about 71 percent

    of the population is still dependent on agriculture. Agriculture in the state is still traditional and

    mostly rain fed. There is high proportion of low value crops with low productivity. Agricultural

    holdings are fragmented. Madhya Pradesh has unique topography, soil and weather, which is one

    of the major reasons that the impact of green revolution had been negligible on the agriculture

    sector of the state

    About 74% population of M.P. resides in rural areas. Around 65 percentage of the total land

    holdings belong to small and marginal farmers occupying only 26 percent of the cultivable land.

    The net sown area is about 147.90 lakh hectares. The gross cropped area is 202.16 lakh hectares.

    The ratio of Kharif to Rabi crops is 1: 0.79 during 2006-07. The total irrigated area of the State is

    43.3 % and remaining area is rain fed. The cropping intensity of the State is 136%.

    The State is divided in the following 11 Agro Climatic Zones: (1) Chhatisgarh plains (Balaghat

    district falls in this zone) (2) Northern hill region of Chhatisgarh (Districts of Shahdol,

    Mandla, Dindori, Anuppur, Umaria and part of Sidhi fall in zone) (3) Kymore plateau and

    Satpura hills (4) Central Narmada Valley (5) Vindhya Plateau (6) Gird region (7) Bundel Khand

    (8) Satpura Plateau (9) Malwa Plateau (10) Nimar Plains (11) Jhabua hills. Agro ecologicallythe state falls in three zones namely, Zone VII (Eastern Plateau and hills Zone), Zone VIII

    (Central plateau and hills Zone) and Zone IX (Western Plateau and hills Zone)

    The major Kharif crops are: Maize, soyabean, Tur, Urad, Moong, Groundnut and Cotton etc.

    The major Rabi crops are: Wheat, Gram, etc.

    As part of the Management Traineeship Segment-II, the major persona was feasibility study of

    distribution of agriculture inputs and farm equipments on lease through GVT. A study of

    business analysis in both financial and operational aspect of different opportunities was carried

    out to understand the various perspectives for the initiatives undertaken by GVT. In order to

    identify challenges for the organization in current and future context different concepts that were

    learnt in the classroom were utilized.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    5/52

    Page | 5

    3.1 Global Agri-Input Scenario:World fertilizer consumption increased from 1995/96 to 1999/2000, declined in 2000/01 by

    about 3 percent and then increased by 1 percent. Fertilizer consumption remained stable in

    Developing countries and but increased in developed countries by 4 percent. World nutrient

    consumption in 2001/02 showed an overall rise for all three nutrients (nitrogen, phosphate and

    potash). Compared with 2000/01, nitrogen consumption increased by 1.3 percent, while

    phosphate and potash consumption fell by 1.7 and 4.3 percent respectively. World fertilizer

    consumption started to increase again in 2001/02. The trend in the developed countries showed

    an annual decrease of 3.3 percent for the period 19902000. In the economies in transition, the

    annual rate of decline was 12 percent for the same period. Total world nutrient production

    increased by 2.7 percent in 2001/02 in response to increased demand. In the developing

    countries, production increased 1.7 percent (about 0.8 million tonnes) for all three nutrients.

    Africa increased its production by 4 percent and production in Asia rose by 1.8 percent. In

    developed countries it increased by 0.3 percent. Australia increased its production by 13.6

    percent, Belarus by 7.3 percent, the Russian federation by 5.8 percent and the Unites States by

    6.2 percent. China is the largest producer and accounted for 20.4 percent of the worlds

    production in 2001/02.

    Total world nutrient trade in 2001/02 rose by 4 million tones (6.6 percent). International fertilizer

    trade occurs almost equally in developed and developing countries. Exports of nitrogen andpotash decreased by 1.5 and 1.9 percent respectively, while those of phosphate increased by 2.1

    percent

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    6/52

    Page | 6

    3.2 Agri Input Scenario In India:India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are the major fertilizer consuming countries in Southeast Asia.

    The sub-region faces considerable demographic pressure, with very limited reserves of good

    agricultural land. Fertilizer consumption rose 3 percent to 2.2 million tonnes. Preliminary

    forecasts indicate an average growth of 2.4 percent. Growth should be faster on the phosphate

    (3.1 percent) than nitrogen (2.1 percent) and potash (2.7 percent). In India, the largest consumer

    of fertilizers and producer of the subregion, nitrogen, phosphate and potash consumption

    increased by 3.6, 6.4 and 4 percent respectively. Imports of nitrogen, phosphate and potash also

    increased by 12.3, 16.9 and 6.5 percent respectively. Higher increase in the consumption of

    phosphate and potash compared to nitrogen is a positive trend towards a balanced use of

    nutrients. The production of nitrogen fertilizers in India fell by 2.3 percent while the production

    of phosphate fertilizers increased by 2.7 percent. Politics of India New rates for urea intends to

    gradually move towards parity with international prices and will be implemented in stages. The

    new system is expected to promote production efficiency through measures to reduce costs and

    effectiveness of business practices at par with international standards by domestic producers of

    urea. Subsidy on phosphorus and potassium fertilizers released is given under the concession

    regime, which varies by state. The government has linked their import price parity from April

    2002. Therefore, natural gas prices put significant increase. The growth in demand for urea has

    been stagnant. The reasons for this change are the development of large grain surpluses, despite agrowing population, and the need for crop diversification using compounds rather than urea.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    7/52

    Page | 7

    4 ABOUT THE ORGANIZATIONGramin Vikas Trust (GVT), committed for development of the rural livelihoods was established

    by Krishak Bharti Co-operative Limited, with the support from Govt. of India and Department

    for International Development (DFID), U.K. The mission of GVT is to act as a catalyst involving

    and enabling the rural communities to improve their livelihoods in the resource poor areas.

    Gramin Vikas Trust has been registered, under Indian Trust Act 1882, at New Delhi, vide

    Registration No. 1501/4 dated 4th May 1999 (Book No. IV, page no. 145-163). Its Registered

    Office is: 49-50 Red Rose House, Nehru Place, New Delhi 110 019 and its corporate office is

    KRIBHCO Bhawan in Noida, U.P. GVT is exempted under section 35 AC and 80G of Income

    Tax Act.1961, besides it also has exemption under section 197 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1961.

    GVT is registered under Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), 1976, with registration

    no. 231660318. Organizational Setup GVT is headed by a Board of Trustees, consisting of 7

    (seven) Ex-Officio Members comprising of Chairman, Vice Chairman, Managing Director,

    Finance Director and Marketing Director of KRIBHCO and two nominees from the Department

    of Fertilizers, Govt. of India. Four nominated members are also on the board having expertise in

    the field of Agriculture and Agricultural Research, Rural Development, Non Government/

    Voluntary Sector and Social Sciences.

    4.1 MissionTo act as catalyst to enable the rural poor to improve their livelihoods by supporting productivity

    improvement programmes in agriculture and rural and rural non-farming sectors which : Are planned, implemented and evaluated jointly with beneficiaries Discriminate positively in favour of women and other disadvantaged groups Link effectively with the programmes of other governmental and non-governmental

    organizations and

    Are sustainable in the long run without the intervention of any outside agency4.2 Vision To design and implement rural livelihood programmes in different parts of the country To develop appropriate participatory gender focused agricultural technologies for rain fed

    areas

    To offer research and consultancy services to government and NGOs and communitybased

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    8/52

    Page | 8

    organizations in the field of participatory technology development, project managementand participatory rural appraisals

    4.3 Objectives of GVT: Improvement of livelihood of tribal and farming community. Gender and poverty focused participatory approaches and its implementation. Establishment of village based institutions. Capacity building of community by setting up training centers. Consultancy on Rural Development to different organizations/institutions and other

    organizations

    Research and other related activities on sustainable agriculture Sustainable links with government, non-government, Educational and Research

    Institution

    4.4 Approach of GVTThey work with

    Community Participatory Approach Team Work Innovation and Creativity Dedication & Passion Professionalism

    .

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    9/52

    Page | 9

    4.5 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

    4.6 KEY STRENGTHS: A well developed and tested Project Planning, Monitoring and Review system based on

    Log frame with emphasis on quantity, quality and time in practice.

    A high percentage of community contribution in all project activities ensuring thesustainability of the development interventions.

    Board of Trustee

    Chief Executive Officer

    Zonal Program Manager

    (EAST)

    Zonal Program Manager (WEST)

    DGM (HR)

    Sr. Manager (M& E)

    Manager (Accounts)

    KVK, Godda

    Crop

    NLRI, Ratlam

    Crop Consultant,

    RPM(Jharkhan

    d)

    RPM

    (Bihar)

    RPM(Odisha

    RPM(W. Bengal)

    RPM(M.P)

    RPM(Gujarat)

    RPM(Rajasthan)

    RPM(C.G)

    PO (4)

    SPO (4)

    APO (8)

    Jankar

    SPO (4)

    PO (4)

    APO (8)

    Jankar

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    10/52

    Page | 10

    Transparent and flexible system of working based on a demand led environment. GVT is being connected closely with a team of experienced and highly skilled

    International and National Consultants, as well as Research based and Academic

    Institutes.

    Strong back ups from the Corporate parent bodies like KRIBHCO, Government of India,and International Funding Agencies.

    Long and consistent experience of working with the rural communities with bottom upapproaches emphasizing on gender and poverty.

    GVT has developed Innovations in the areas of FAMPAR (Farmer ManagedParticipatory Research), PTG (Participatory Technology Generation) PVS (Participatory

    Varietal Selection) MLSP (Migrant Labour Support Programmes) Challenge Fund (Small

    Grant Programme with GOs & NGOs) Development of improvised agronomic

    equipments for drudgery reduction.

    GVT over the years has developed fast tracking means of poverty reduction and fieldstrategies such as dissemination (Prasar), empowerment and capacity building processes,

    village institutions and hand-holding mechanisms, withdrawal strategy, and post- project

    management

    .

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    11/52

    Page | 11

    5 BACKGROUND MY STUDYAs a part of our two year postgraduate Programme in Rural Management at KSRM, I have to

    undergo a two month field level project termed Management Traineeship Segment-II (MTS-II)

    wherein I got the opportunity to work with the Gramin Vikas Trust (GVT) as NGO which is

    working as enhancing Sustainable Livelihood development and poverty reduction and

    empowering communities to manage resources in rural and tribal areas, initially under direct

    control of KRIBHCO. My project titled Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the

    tribal community of Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District. The reasons as to why I

    took this particular project will be attributed to my keen interest to know about the agriculture

    practices of tribal area, to know the role of community institution in the rural market

    management and to know the what marketing strategies they apply to market of their product in

    this region.

    Government of India along with the State Government, in making the economic growth

    processes more inclusive by reaching out to millions of poor households in the rural tribal area,

    through the implementation of special and unique programmes and projects for sustainable

    development, rural employment generation, agri-business, natural resources regeneration and

    management, rural infrastructure, minor irrigation, soil fertility, undulated topography etc

    through a gender responsive approach. Indias commendable job in promoting self-help groups

    of man & women and empowering them through member- based organization, like Producer

    Company and enterprise-based activities together with strengthening of the decentralizedgovernance system makes the Indian experience a model worth emulating.

    5.1 ObjectiveThe Objectives of the study are: To acquaint ourselves with present agricultural scenario viz. agricultural inputs,

    agricultural services used at target villages and average expenditure of the farmer on the

    same.

    To estimate the demand for agricultural inputs and other related services in the targetvillages.

    To assess the market condition of the agriculture inputs and services. To prepare a producer company model in the target villages.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    12/52

    Page | 12

    5.2 ScopeThe scope of my study was limited to analyzing the agricultural input & market study in tribal

    area in the maghnager and Jhabua block of Jhabua Districts.As far as understanding of the

    production system is considered it is developed through various methods of agricultural

    practices. And study the role of community institutions in development of the rural market and to

    know the structure, functioning and training modules of seed society. The geographical area of

    Jhabua Districts will be very much different from the other pert of MP. The scope of my field

    visits in this project was confined to Meghnager and Jhabua Block of Jhabua Districts of MP.

    5.3 LimitationsWhile conducting this study I face the some limitations which could be enumerated below

    The total coverage areas of the project area will very vast and it will not possible tocovered total area.

    Visiting the area were completely unfamiliar for me, my visit was confined. The time period was not sufficient enough for studying the different dimensions and

    details which could be more beneficial..

    Poor and delayed transportation facility also delayed the data collection. The major limitations were faced during my field visit, as the facts of ground reality of

    agri-input concept not properly understand by the farmer.

    More specifically, this study deals with understanding the rural marketing mechanism in the

    tribal area.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    13/52

    Page | 13

    6 METHODOLOGYI carried out a field investigation regarding the involvement of seed society in the seed produce

    business and its associated links in supply chain networks. The data collected was both

    qualitative and quantitative in nature. The data was collected from farmers through direct

    interviews from the study area. The study consisted of field visits which provide me the practical

    knowledge of the field. For preparing the summary of the plans a basic framework was devised

    for evaluate all the units on common parameters.

    Phase 1:

    The phase 1 of the project consisted of the background study on agricultural inputs used in

    Madhya Pradesh, the demographic features and agricultural pattern .It include detailed

    discussion with the staff of GVT, based on the discussion and background study the

    questionnaires were developed.

    Phases

    Phase 1

    (Backgroun

    d Study)

    DiscussionWith RPM

    Jabua

    Sample

    Design

    QuestionnaireDevelopment

    Phase 2

    (FieldWork)

    Data

    Collection

    Data

    Analysis

    Report

    Writing

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    14/52

    Page | 14

    Phase 2:

    The phase 2 of the project consisted of the field work for the collection of data from the

    respondents. Various statistical tools were applied to analyze the data. The final report was

    prepared on the analyzed data.

    6.1 Designated Project Area:The area of this study is limited to five villages of Jhabua and Meghnaer Block and the markets

    of both these block . The respondents for the questionnaire based survey were all in Garwada,

    Manpura, guindipara, Khari and Jhaira.

    6.2 Sample Design and Sampling Method:In a stratified sample the sampling frame is divided into three different criteria. These are

    Marginal land holding farmer(less than 5 bigha) Small land holding farmer (5 to 15 bigha), and

    large land holding farmer(More than 15 bigha). Then the respondents are randomly selected

    based on their availability and willingness to participate in the survey. The Farmers Households

    of the 5 villages of Jahbua and Magenager Block were the universe for the study with one farmer

    as unit of the study.

    6.3 Survey Design:In order to conduct a comprehensive and meaningful study the basic requirement is of accurate

    and reliable data. In my study I have collected both primary and secondary data in order to meet

    the true purpose of my study.

    For primary data collection one set of questionnaires were designed in order to get information

    from the different categories of the farmer. Questionnaire was designed for the farmers who uses

    any kind of agricultural inputs and services like fertilizers both organic and inorganic, tractors,

    cropping pattern, different type of variety of seed uses, storage facility, thrashers etc., the second

    collected the information from the retailers to analyze the market .The questionnaire was framed

    with notable demographic and psychological variable. A psychological instrument of theirinterest in agricultural inputs attributes and opinion statements were used to understand the

    respondents interest and opinion regarding further improvement in sector of agricultural inputs.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    15/52

    Page | 15

    6.4 Data CollectionSince the research involved analysis on both the product and the process, the data was collected

    for both.

    6.5 Product data collectionThe data on product was collected from potential customers. The data was collected through both

    questionnaire and discussion based methodology. The data here was collected to know about the

    preference and usage of farmers/consumer towards agri-input products and their perceived

    demand.

    6.6 Process data collectionThis data was mainly collected on what the ongoing process is and how it can be improved. This

    data was firstly collected from the local markets, how agri-inputs are availed from district level

    distributor and how do they sell it to farmers, what is the potential demand and what is the

    seasonality.

    6.7 Data AnalysisThe data collected was processed or analyzed using various statistical tools after tabular and

    graphical summarization of the raw data. After the data analysis the final conclusion were drawn

    and these conclusion formed the basis for developing the marketing strategy.

    6.8 Rationale of the study:Though the contribution of the

    primary sector, which includes

    agriculture, to the total Net State

    Domestic Product is gradually

    coming down, agriculture is still the

    mainstay of the state economy, as

    about 71 percent of the population is

    still dependent on the agriculture The

    work participation rate in state is

    42.74, out of the total worker 42.79%

    are cultivator 28.69 are agriculture

    labourer, 4.01 are engaged in house

    hold industry and the rest are in other

    Source review of Madhya Pradesh Economy, CMIE,

    Au ust 2004

    35%

    24%

    41%

    Madhya pradesh - Sectoral contributionto GDP

    Aricultural

    Industries

    Services

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    16/52

    Page | 16

    services. Agriculture in the state is still traditional and rain fed. There is high proportion of low

    value crops with low productivity, agriculture holdings are fragmented. Thus it clearly state that

    agriculture is the major livelihood activity in the region but still it contribute least in the GSDP

    and NSDP of the Madhya Pradesh.

    The jhabua district my area of study is also representing the same picture. The major constraints

    in the low agriculture productivity in the region are as follows

    Fragmented and small land holdings. Rain fed agriculture. Traditional agricultural practices (lesser utilization of fertilizers, pesticides,

    herbicides, traditional agricultural tools and techniques).

    Limited availability of agriculture input and services. Other challenge lays in the heterogeneity of demand and spread of the rural

    villages which results in poor connectivity with agriculture market.

    Low soil depth. Soil fertility. Undulated topography.

    Thus there is need of understanding the demand of agricultural inputs and related services of the

    people in the region and based upon this develop a producer company model to fulfil their needs

    at their own villages that too at fair prices. That can help them to increase the productivity in

    near future.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    17/52

    Page | 17

    7 ANALYSIS AND FINDING7.1 House typeJhabua & Meghnager block of jhabua district more then 80% population are tribals. They dont

    prefer to stay in joint families. Their way

    of leading life is far different from the

    other communities. They live on their own

    plots of land. As my survey out of 150

    sample size 67% houses is thatched, its

    show that economic condition is very

    poor. But although life is hard in these

    remote villages, they are by no means of

    unhappy. Pleaser is taken in simple thing

    and problem is shared. 17% houses are

    concrete and 16% houses are mixed.

    7.2 Source of livelihood

    Primary occupation on this are mainly agricultural. About 95% of people there primary

    occupation are agricultural. Secondary occupation in this area mainly is wage labour.

    17%

    67%

    16%

    House type

    concerate Thatched Mixed

    Source: Questionnaire

    Agricultu

    re

    95%

    service

    4%

    business

    1%

    Primary occupation

    Source: Questionnaire

    agricultu

    ral

    5%

    business

    2%live

    stock

    1%

    wage

    labour

    83%

    other

    9%

    secondary occupation

    Source: Questionnaire

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    18/52

    Page | 18

    7.3 Seed varietyAccording to farmer responded 39% farmer are use of certified seed. Because, reasonable, high

    productivity, resistance to adverse climatic

    conditions and suitability for agriculture for

    the machines stand out as reasons behind

    the preferences of improved varieties thats

    why most farmers use breeder &foundation

    seed. The use of certified seeds it

    affects productivity and therefore it is the

    easiest factor to be changed in the process

    of culture. It is also to help stop the

    spread of the disease and different types of

    viruses. 33% of farmers use seeds TL because it is readily available on the market.

    7.4 Maize seedJVM-421 is most preferred by farmers

    in five villages. JVM-421 genotype is very

    good,which entered into competition

    with reactive and hybrid under rain fed

    conditions is to have a higher return

    potential of 30%, and adapted

    intercropping and loved by the farmer. JVM-

    421 with an average maturity (80-100 d),

    lodging tolerance, ears completely covered

    by balls, and flint grain white fat

    with good food quality and taste, 100-seed weight 24 g; high in protein by 14%. Fairly tolerant

    to adverse conditions and low fertility meet fertilizer suitable for cultivation in the rainy

    seasons and post-rainy. KVK and GVT have also promoted the JVM 421 in the tribal area of

    Jhabua district and JVM 421 is only available for this region.

    59%

    41%

    Maize variety

    JVM-421 HYV

    Source: Questionnaire

    Breader

    seed12%

    T.L

    19%

    Certifie

    d

    32%

    Foundation

    37%

    seed variety

    Source: Questionnaire

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    19/52

    Page | 19

    7.5 Wheat seedThe farmer in this region mainly prefar HI1418 variety of wheat seed. Due to the use of seeds are

    more HI1418, it was recorded maximum grain yield and high dry matter, statistically similar

    to GW173. HI-1418 efficiency

    of water use is low

    compared to other

    varieties. The efficiency of

    water use is 13.08k/ha.mm.

    This region is rain-fed area

    so farmers are mostly

    preferred HI-1418 seed

    varieties.

    7.6 Soyabean seedI used to grow traditional (JS 335) variety of soyabean, which Yielded about 5 quintals per

    acre. With the improved variety

    (JS 9305), the yields have gone

    up to about 8 quintals / acre.

    Crop loss has also been reduced

    and the new variety matures 15

    days earlier, giving me sufficient

    time for Rabi sowing, reveals a

    beaming punjiya wasma.

    HI-1418

    45%

    sujata

    10%

    lok-1

    28%

    wh147

    17%

    Wheat variety

    Source: Questionnaire

    56%

    1%9%

    34%

    Purches seed from diffrent

    market

    Local Market Dealear

    Co-operative KVK&GVT

    Source: Questionnaire

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    20/52

    Page | 20

    8 MARKET ANALYSISThe Key market segment for agriculture inputs and related services are the farmer of the 5 study

    villages which include farmers from meghnager & jhabua block of jhabua district. Most of the

    villages are remotely located and approximately 10-12 Km away from the nearest market/weekly

    Haats. Major Market Centers for the study villages are meghnager, Thanla & Jhabua.

    8.1 Seed purchaseIn this region of the respondent 56% are

    buying seeds there is the local market. GVT

    & KVK also play vital role in this region.

    According to the defendant 34% are collected

    for the same.

    8.2 Selling theproduce

    Mostly farmers prefer local

    market & weekly haat to sale

    their produce as they have

    low transaction cost in

    comparison to Wholesalemarket/mandi & cooperative.

    56%

    1%9%

    34%

    Purches seed from diffrent

    market

    Local Market Dealear

    Co-operative KVK&GVT

    Source: Questionnaire

    Bullock cart

    14%

    Tracktor

    68%

    Tampu

    18%

    Mode of transport

    Source: Questionnaire

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    21/52

    Page | 21

    8.3 Production Three different crop last three year:-

    Wheat production is mostly depended on availability of sufficient water. Due to good rainfall last

    year, there has been a 12% increase in production in comparison to 2009-10. In comparison to

    the maize production of 2009-10, the maize yield by 12% due to the heavy rain fall.

    8.4 Comparison of three different crops

    0

    20000

    40000

    60000

    80000

    100000

    120000

    140000

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    Wheat Maize Gram

    production

    production

    Source: Questionnaire

    0

    50000

    100000

    150000

    200000

    250000

    2008-0

    9

    2009-1

    0

    2010-1

    1

    2008-0

    9

    2009-1

    0

    2010-1

    1

    2008-0

    9

    2009-1

    0

    2010-1

    1

    Wheat Maize Gram

    sold

    own use

    production

    Source: Questionnaire

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    22/52

    Page | 22

    Maize followed by wheat is the primary crop of this area. From the last 3 yrs data, it was seen

    that more than 60% of the maize production, 47% of the wheat produced & 33% of Gram was

    kept for household consumption while the rest were sold at different markets.

    8.5 Mode of transport:-

    Tractor is the most commonly used transport for taking the produce to the market. It was found

    68% of the farmers preferred tractor, while 18% used Tempo for the same. Rest 14% used

    bullock cart to take the produce to the market as it was comparatively lesser cost than the others.

    Area, Production and Productivity of major crops cultivated in the target area

    Sl.No. Crop Area(acc) Production(q)

    1 Maize 234.75 1074

    2 Wheat 136.58 770

    3 Soyabean 242.9 1229

    4 Gram 66.48 129.4

    Per Accare Maize production is-4.5q, Wheat production-5.63q, Soyabean Production-5.05q and

    Gram-1.94q.

    Bullock cart

    14%

    Tracktor

    68%

    Tampu

    18%

    Mode of transport

    Source: Questionnaire

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    23/52

    Page | 23

    9 DEMAND ESTIMATION OF AGRICULTURE INPUTS IN THETARGET VILLAGE

    As the agriculture in the region is mainly rain fed, land fertility is low and most of the farmers

    still rely on the traditional agricultural practices the demand of the agriculture input is not

    satisfactory and less then the expectation of the organization. Although the demand of the

    agriculture input is low still the study villages show the potential for the agriculture inputs and

    related services.

    The study show that among all the agriculture input Urea, DAP and pesticide are mainly used by

    the farmers in the villages. Total demand of the Urea in the sample village is approximately

    128.9 Quintals and that of DAP is about 195.87 Quintals. The Framers buy Urea and DAP

    mostly from the local market. The major constrains for the use of the Urea and DAP by the

    farmers are

    Low fertility and poor soil quality of the Land. Insufficient irrigation facilities due geographical location, poor infrastructure and

    unavailability of irrigation inputs

    Low purchasing power of the farmersOther than Urea, DAP the demand of other agriculture inputs are nominal. Pesticides and

    Vermicompost are used by only 4 percent of the farmer each inputs only that too at some villages

    only. Vermicompost is used in the villages where GVT is at operation and Vermicompost pits

    are built 70% off the cost. The use of other fertilizers like MOP, SSP, and Bio-fertilizers is

    negligible in this region as only one farmer of the sample use MOP and one farmer Bio

    fertilizers.

    Recommendation dose in the tar get villages.

    Crop Urea(q) DAP(q) Seed(q)

    Soyabean 17.64 67.4 76.55

    Maize 50.97 60.3 16.53

    Gram 8.7 28.55 14.66

    Wheat 42.25 48.95 65.9

    Total 119.56 3031.65 173.64

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    24/52

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    25/52

    Page | 25

    points and dissemination meetings / seminars will be organized to achieve the objective. Periodic

    coordination meetings with the online agencies, research institutes, sources of business and

    association representatives will be organized to maximize the synergy and technology transfer

    between the different actors of development. More attention will be given to develop and

    strengthen business ties with merchants, Mandi / markets and community institutions home

    business. The focus will be on sharing business experiences, sale and purchase of local products

    of mutual interest.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    26/52

    Page | 26

    10.1Rural Marketing Pattern

    Transportation of various

    farm produce from farmer

    field

    Consume

    Supply to big retail such as

    Ruchi soya,ITC soya etc.

    Facilitate the

    transportation, supply

    Sell throughFarmer association

    Facilitator helps the farmer in retailshopping of soyabean in the local

    market through retail out

    Storing collection

    Grading packing, sorting &

    distribution

    Facilitator (FIG) helps the farmerin producing the different

    Create the big marketing

    linkage for surplus product(Retail marketing) at the state

    Proper communication

    channel b/w farmer &

    Create the local marketing

    link b/w agricultural produce

    Proper information of supply throughthe Managers of Improve tech. & post

    Role of the farmer

    Association in farm produce

    Promote thenetworking of regulate

    Promotion of different varieties

    of farmer farm in vegetable

    production reproduces

    Direct marketing of thefarm produce by the

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    27/52

    Page | 27

    10.2Supply Chain and Rural Marketing Network of Tribal DivisionSupply chain management (SCM) is the term used to describe the management of the flow of

    materials, information, and funds across the entire supply chain, from suppliers to component

    producers to final assemblers to distribution (warehouses and retailers), and ultimately to the

    consumer. In fact, it often includes after-sales service and returns or recycling. It is a schematic

    of a supply chain. SCM typically involves coordination of information and materials among

    multiple forms. Supply chain management has generated much interest in recent years for a

    number of reasons. Managers now realize that actions taken by one member of the chain can

    influence the profitability of all others in the chain. Firms are increasingly thinking in terms of

    competing as part of a supply chain against other supply chains, rather than as a single firm

    against other individual firms. Also, as firms successfully streamline their own operations, the

    next opportunity for improvement is through better coordination with their suppliers and

    customers.

    Present rural system having activities include analysis of current agri-business activities, existing

    market chain, marketing and infrastructure availability and future needs, farm input requirement,

    value addition potential and requirements, and local market assessment and demand-supply

    scenario. Agri-business needs for Farmer Associations are being assessed and orientation

    training for the informal Association has been given to the producer company for the association

    formation.

    10.3Present Supply Chain of Rural MarketIt has been observed that the supply and demand equilibrium for the soyabean &wheat produce

    in the state is unequal. The production of traditional other cash crops like cotton are more

    produce than the soyabean , which pulls up the price of soyabean market. The market of these

    cereals crops is also hike due to inadequate storage and transport facilities available in the state.

    Such bottlenecks are also attributed to the distress sales of soyabean & wheat produce in the post

    harvest season. The farmers find it most profitable to arrange transporting their soyebean

    produce across the states in order to fetch better price. In all, the trade across the state is more

    channelized than the domestic/local markets. There are few point which being important in

    supply of various commodity of soyabean products

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    28/52

    Page | 28

    The categories define are:--

    Location Transportation and logistics Inventory and forecasting Marketing and channel restructuring Sourcing and supplier management Information and electronic mediated environments Product design and new product introduction Service and after sales support Reverse logistics and green issues Outsourcing and strategic alliances

    10.4Some existing models of movement of farm produce from farm tomarket-

    Traditionally the farmers use to carry their crops to village market and weakly haat to sell them.

    The farmer sells their produces (food grains,

    pulses, soyabean, cotton etc.) in these

    village market or weakly haat and gets

    money. The traditional flow of produce

    (agricultural and horticultural crops) follows

    the pattern of farmer to market and from

    their either to wholesaler or consumer.

    However, the flow of the produces in the

    current years follows the different pattern

    with involvement of the lots of

    intermediary, commission agents etc.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    29/52

    Page | 29

    Present Marketing Scenario

    Farmers

    Rural Primary

    MarketRegulated marketed (principal)/

    collection center

    Direct market

    (Saturday market, spotmarket)

    Wholesale, Processor, traders

    Retail vendor

    Consumer

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    30/52

    Page | 30

    Model of Supply Chain of Produce Required

    These new supply chains not only consider the farmer as a part of the chain but also try to

    provide the real worth of their produce. These organized supply chain as more efficient in terms

    of serving the nee of both farmers and consumers. These not only provide the real worth of the

    produce to the farmer, but also increase the efficiency of the system. It serves the customer with

    Production at

    Market information &

    communication center

    Sorting /grading/PackagingCollection center

    District mandiesRegulated wholesalemarket

    Local market

    Sunday market Whole sellerNational mandies

    DistributorLocal

    Retailer

    Consumer

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    31/52

    Page | 31

    quality produce at the affordable price by reducing the margins consumed by the intermediary.

    These new supply chain and movement of produce from farm to fork has provided the farmers

    the new motivation to serve the country in more efficient and effective manner. In addition, the

    new policies of trade have provided the farmer with linkage opportunity to global world through

    efficient market mechanisms.

    10.5Value addition and marketing supportValue addition and marketing support these two project component are aimed towards the

    achieving income generation of the rural people through the agri-business. Focus will be laid on

    increasing environmentally sustainable income generating activities of targeted clientele.

    Increased income opportunities at individual farmers level will create a greater need for

    community members to work together to sell their commodities and to procure inputs including

    training and improved technologies. Thus the problem of isolation, staggered and small

    production can be solved through collective marketing. GVT will be encouraged to procure

    produce from its members and supply to the market sources offering better price via PC.

    Assessment of marketing needs for Producer Company will be identified through regular

    interactive meetings, focus group discussions and need assessment workshops/meetings. The

    marketing and procurement committees with representatives of the farmer would be made

    responsible to create links with suppliers, update list of suppliers and buyers, and collectinformation on types of products available and costs. The marketing and procurement committee

    will negotiate price and share this information with members. GVT will support Producer

    Company in production and marketing planning and business operations.

    Need assessment will include commodities (marketable surplus), current method of selling,

    terms of payment, price variation with the market chain, inventory of traders, means and costs of

    transport, marketing structure availability, future requirements and seasonality. The results will

    be used for business planning. Similarly farm input and infrastructure needs will be identified

    and shared with group/ association leaders. The information will also help in determining market

    choice, cost of procurement and transportation etc.

    To build capacity of potential members in procurement and marketing, specific trainings will be

    organized for target clientele, which will be followed by refresher trainings. Capacity building of

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    32/52

    Page | 32

    marketing and procurement committees would be done through exposure visits to similar

    business organizations and market places/ mandis/ agri-business companies. GVT will also help

    to develop a market information system (MIS) for the groups and provide training to the

    committee/ leadership to manage and use this MIS.

    Value addition and quality control programs will be encouraged in the group and association

    level. Trainings, exposures to successful interventions and demonstrations will be provided to the

    target group to build capacity on technical and business aspects. Local produce other than

    promoted by the project will be used for possible value addition. Options for value addition will

    be analyzed for economic viability and results will be shared with the focus groups. Based on

    information gathered, GVT will collaborate with SFAC (small farmers Agribusiness

    consortium ) management for further implementation. The value addition will be based on the

    market demand. This will include sorting/grading, processing or semi-processing and packaging.

    Promotion and advertising will be encouraged to capture niche markets. Results of needs

    assessment will also be helpful to decide choice of value addition.

    10.6Constraints in Rural Market Fragmented and scattered land holding Sub-standard farming system Natural catastrophe Middleman hold Lack of market information Scattered production do not allows economies of scale Remoteness and undulating terrain Issue of timely availability of farm inputs Damage by wild animals Transportation Handling & Value added services

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    33/52

    Page | 33

    10.7Reasons for Improvement of Rural market of the tribal region Socio-economic changes (lifestyle, habits and tastes, economic status) Literacy level (25% before independencemore than 44.45% in 2011) Infrastructure facilities (roads & information system) Increase in income Increase in expectations Rejuvenation of old orchards and establishment of fruits processing units. Setting up of post harvest infrastructure and distribution outlets. Establishment of ploy house and green house for production. Contract farming to improve supply chain. Processing of medicinal and aromatic plants. Preservation and storage facilities and quality control laboratories. Market identification and infrastructure auction center & sales outlets. Establishment of poly houses, micro irrigation projects, floriculture park and oil

    extraction processing units.

    Production of organic spices. Establishment of small & medium size Agro and Food Parks. Organic tea production and establishment of processing and packaging units

    10.8Future Plans Increased the number of farmer. Provide trainings/demonstrations on capacity building & strengthening the FG Trainings on quality control and grading and packaging of various consumers product Trainings on post harvest management practices, storage and transport Exposure visits of farmers to other agribusiness initiatives Trainings each in group management and leadership development Trainings each in record keeping and conflict resolution Set up at least collection centers for collection of produce from farmers Be appropriate value addition programme such as quality control, grading and packaging Promote agribusiness associated income generation activities Study and implement production scheduling according to market supply/window. Strengthening the farmer association and provide the basic functioning infrastructure.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    34/52

    Page | 34

    Pre-formation meetings for new associations Trainings for orientation of Farmer group. Trainings / Workshops on market and infrastructure for the new association and

    previously formed Farmer group.

    Formation of Agric extension service centers Association policies and byelaws, book keeping and record maintenance of Farmer

    group. should be properly maintain

    Training on marketing and Procurement of various perishable product should beprovided. Trainings on business plan development

    Provide the training of use of MIS to the member of FA.

    11 UNDERSTANDING PRODUCER COMPANY11.1PRIMARY PRODUCEProduce of farmers from agriculture and allied activities or produce of persons engaged in

    handloom, handicraft and other cottage industries, including any by-product and product

    resulting from ancillary activities thereof. Also, any activity intended to increase the production

    or quality of aforementioned products or activities.

    11.2PRODUCERAny person engaged in any activity connected with or relatable to any primary produce.

    11.3PRODUCER INSTITUTIONProducer Company or Institution having only producer(s) or Producer Company(ies) as its

    members (may or may not be incorporated) having specified objects and agreeing to

    make use of the services of the Producer Company(ies)3.

    11.4PRODUCER COMPANYA body corporate registered under the Companies Act, 1956; and having specified objects and

    activities (referbox). Ownership and membership of such companies is held only by Primary

    Producers or Producer Institution, and member equity shall not be publicly traded. However it

    may be transferred, only with the approval of the board of directors of the Producer Company.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    35/52

    Page | 35

    11.5WHO CAN FORM PRODUCER COMPANY?Any one of the following can get a producer company incorporated under the

    Act:

    Any ten or more persons engaged in any activity connected with primary

    produce, or Any two or more producer institutions or companies, or A combination of ten or

    more individuals and producer institutions.

    11.6CHARACTERISTICS OF PRODUCER COMPANY The registered producer company should be treated as a private limited company with the

    significant difference that a minimum of two people cannot get them registered.

    These companies are with limited liabilities and limited only by share capital. The liability of the members is limited to the unpaid amount of the shares held by them. As per the new circular, minimum paid-up authorized capital is of Rs. 5 lakh. The maximum number of members can exceed 50. It shall never become a public (or deemed public) limited company. Members' equity cannot be publicly traded but be only transferred.

    As such, "producer companies would not be vulnerable to takeover by other companies or by

    Multi-national Companies (MNCs).''

    12 OBJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF PRODUCER COMPANY(As per the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002, Section No. 581B)

    Production, harvesting, procurement, grading, pooling, handling, marketing, selling, export of

    primary produce of the members or import of goods or services for their benefit, processing the

    produce of members, manufacture, sale or supply of machinery, consumables, etc to members,

    providing education and other welfare activities for members, generation, transmission and

    distribution and distribution of power, revitalization of land and water resources, their use,

    conservation and communications relatable to primary produce, insurance of produce, and other

    allied or ancillary activities including financing thereof.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    36/52

    Page | 36

    13 STAGES OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FOR PRODUCERCOMPANY

    13.1 Village study and preliminary identification The village study/profile may have been conducted by the team in the prescribed format. The findings of the profiling may indicate one or more livelihood activities that are

    predominant in the area and involve a sizeable number of the poor/women, in which there

    is a potential for increasing returns through aggregation. Aggregation can be done for

    supply of inputs (seeds, fertilizers, cattle feed, raw materials, credit etc.), management of

    resources (water, common land etc.), processing/ value addition, marketing of output.

    Identify the activity/s and what can be done through aggregation. Prepare a brief note onthe feasibility analysis

    13.2Feasibility studyConduct a detailed feasibility study for the particular and the proposed activity. This would

    include the following. Prepare formats/questionnaires/interview schedules as required for each of

    these.

    Community Background Study in which the farmer group will be established. Identify, : The living conditions of different socio-economic groups in the community The needs of the community, especially of the poor The way the community solves its problems (e.g does it use traditional methods and/ or

    involvement or assistance of outside organizations?)

    Social patterns in the community including who talks to whom and why Informal and formal organization of men and women ( both mixed and separate) Links between the community and supply of services and who controls them Preliminary assessment of availability of the commodity/service around which producers

    will have to be organized volume, value, market access

    Centrality analysis: Whether the commodity/activity is central/significant in the minds ofthe community. Whether it contributes (or has potential to contribute) significantly to

    their livelihood portfolio?

    Data collection: Collect relevant secondary and primary data on the commodity inquestion and the related factors affecting its procurement /inputs/ production/ storage/

    marketing.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    37/52

    Page | 37

    Cost-benefit and break-even analysis for the proposed activity/activities of theorganization.

    13.3Report and action plan Prepare a consolidated report, including proposed action plan.

    13.4Organizing Identification of opinion leaders: Identify opinion leaders from among the producers and

    form a representative group of proactive people.

    Orientation of leaders: Share the findings of the feasibility study and discuss the need forformation of an organization to utilize the potential of the particular livelihood activity.

    Discussion with village community - Involve the leaders group to organize a series of meetings

    of the village community (Gram Sabhas) to discuss the following:

    Necessity for collective action Values in collective action Findings of feasibility study Proposed activities, product- value addition, linkages etc Proposed action plan

    This communication with the people needs to be repetitive and cannot be done in one meeting.

    Training and exposure of producers: Organize trainings for producers on concepts and roles of

    the other producer company and their own roles as members. If possible, also organize exposure

    visits to similar community organizations in the nearby area.

    13.5FormalizingVisioning: Facilitate formulation of vision and mission of the collective with the promoters.

    Develop with them the values on which organization should be based.

    Objectives and plans - Identify specific and realistic goals/objectives to inform the development

    of work plans and budgets. Some basic questions addressed through focus group discussions can

    help to identify objectives Design an appropriate organization - objectives, activities, structure, rules, legal form and

    basic operating system (work flow) - in consultation with the leaders. Provide them

    complete information on each aspect and facilitate decision-making.

    Identify rules including obligations of group members to ensure the smooth running ofthe group and avoid conflict within the group

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    38/52

    Page | 38

    Identify responsibility for leadership, coordination of logistics, record keeping,networking, team building, communication and other roles.

    Facilitate the election of the Governing Board/ Management Committee and officebearers, as required depending on the legal form of the organization. Facilitate framing of

    Vision, Mission, and Goals and draft the byelaws and other applicable resolutions with

    the board. Also facilitate the formation of subcommittees, as required, and clarify their

    roles and responsibilities.

    Opening of bank account: Facilitate opening of a bank account, with signatories as perthe byelaws of the organization.

    Collect share capital and other necessary fees: Collect the share capital, membership feesas applicable from members and deposit in the bank account.

    Registration: Complete the documentation required for registration and follow-up theprocess of registration. The Board/office bearers should take responsibility of these

    activities; we should have a facilitation role. Obtain the following from the Registrar

    office

    13.6Registration certificatePlease note that registration is not an essential part of formalizing at this stage. The organization

    may initiate its operations and register in the appropriate legal form later, when the membership

    and operations are sizeable. Informed member choice is paramount. If the organization decidesto function as an informal group, registration may not be required at all.

    Systems development

    Operating system: Facilitate detailing of the Operating system, including the accountingsystem and document in the form of a manual in the vernacular. The Operating system of

    such organizations would include different elements, indications.

    Information system: A manual/semi automated MIS will have to be developed for theorganization, as customized software may not be available for different activities.

    HR system: In case the organization has hired significant number of staff, the HR systemwill have to be developed as well. Otherwise the system for roles and responsibilities,

    authority, compensation/remuneration etc. of the Executive board/operational sub-

    committee members who run the day-to-day operations should be developed.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    39/52

    Page | 39

    Planning and review: Formulate a process and template for Business planning. Alsodevelop a system of reviewing the performance against the plan.

    Document the above into a manual. Prepare the manual in vernacular and circulate to Management Committee/board.

    13.7Business planning Facilitate development of a broad Business plan. Obtain feedback on the plan

    13.8 Linkages with other organizations Facilitate long term collaborations with institutions/individuals such as input suppliers,

    service providers like designers/veterinary doctors/research institutions as applicable,

    buyers, funders etc.

    13.9Monitoring and review Monitor the operations and governance of the institution closely through reports and

    visits.

    Review the performance jointly provide guidance for overcoming problems.14 KEY ACTIVITIES, TIMELINE, DELIVERABLE AND MEASURES OF

    VERIFICATION

    Timeline

    Key Activities Deliverables Means of verification

    1.month

    Stage One : Pre-projectImplementation (one month) (i)

    Baseline on volume, value &market access, centrality analysis,

    (ii) Identification of Productspecific clusters (iii)Feasibility

    Analysis -break-even estimates(iii) Project Implementation Plan -

    procurement, inputs, storage andmarketing,

    Detailed Project Report(Checklist Provided) (i) List of

    Product specific clustersidentified (ii) Database of

    farmers prepared,

    (i) Submitted DPR (ii)Meeting minutes and

    photographs ofmeetings

    8.

    month

    Stage Two : Enhancing Capacity

    for Surplus Farm Production (i)Village meetings identify potentialfarmers, identify opinion leaders

    (ii) Identification of potentialfarmers for producer

    company(PC), LRP/BF/LFIdentification (iii) Exposure Visit

    of Farmers/opinion leaders (iv)

    Farmers Organised in PC, LRP

    identified and Trainingcompleted(i)Farmer Origination and FG

    formed (ii)Trained LRP/BFready for deployment

    (iii)Extension Model includingMonitoring Systems in Place

    (i) List of FO (ii) List

    of LRP/BF/LF trainedand ready fordeployment (iii)

    Training curriculum,training report &

    participant list.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    40/52

    Page | 40

    Forming Farmers Organisations

    (v) Identification of TrainingNeeds of FOs (vi) Imparting

    training to farmers of PCs

    16.

    Month

    Stage Three : Implementation for

    Surplus Farm Production Plan(i)Hand holding support on

    Productivity Increase, IPM/ INM/IPwm

    (ii)IdentifyingValue-propositionfor setting PC (logic of

    collectivization)

    (i)Farmers Participate in

    Improved vegetable/pulsebased farming system

    (ii)Disgaggregation/Aggregation Systems put in place

    (iii)Business Case ofFPO/Collective prepared

    (checklist provided)

    (i)List of farmers

    adopting package ofpractices

    (ii)No. of farmerssupported, areas of

    demonstration(iii) Business Case of

    PC/ex-ante

    24.

    month

    Stage Four : Pre-formation Stage

    of FPO/Collective and StabilizeNew Surplus Production System &

    (i)Farmers in 2nd Crop Cycle(ii)Market Linkages for Produce

    (iii) Systems of single commoditymarket : portfolio-cropped

    household farming systemInterface detailed (iii)Exposure

    Visit, consultation for PC scoping,vision & structure

    (i) Demonstration of Farmer

    Patronage to Project Concept(70% repeat farmers)

    (ii)Collectivizationarrangements (PC) Instituted

    (i) Repeat Farmer List

    (ii) Minutes of FG andassociative tier

    meetings, photographs.

    36month

    Stage Five :Formation of FPO/Collective

    Aggregation for market access (i)Finalising list of PC Constitutions

    of Internal Systems(ii)Membership & Governance andframing of Bye-laws (iii)CB need

    assessment & inputs (iv)Strengthening PC providing

    services for system development(Operating System, MIS, HR),

    (v)Business Planning Exercise(vi)Interface with

    buyers/marketers

    (i) Institutional Arrangementsfor Market Access Placed (ii)

    PC/Collective/AggregationStructure Placed

    (i) Minutes of meetingFG subscription to

    PC/collective(ii) Registration &

    Compliances(iii) Business Plan withkey business processes

    (iv) List of buyersconsulted, meeting

    report & outcome(MoU on price, volume

    and grading)(v) List of needs,

    training design, trainingreports.

    48.

    month

    Stage Six :

    Phase-out Systems for post-projectsustainability

    Business Plan (i) Statutory

    Clearance obtained (ii)Operating System grounded

    (iii)Agreement for long-termsupport with LPO

    (i) Business Plan

    including financingplan (ii) Regulatory

    approvals for PCactivities

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    41/52

    Page | 41

    14.1Project OutcomesEconomic Impact

    Per hectare productionimproved by 10% by end ofproject period

    Increase in net return tofarmer (Inflation +10%)

    Increase in sub-sectordevelopment for agriculture

    Reduce gap in availability ofinputs by 20-25%

    Increased food & nutritionalsecurity

    Market linkage for thebackward and forward

    integration will be ensuredwith competitive market

    Additional employmentgenerated due to increased

    intensity of farming Benchmark minimum wage

    rate for labor Reduction in Migration

    Social Impact Social capital built in the form of

    PC Improve gender relation &

    decision making of womenfarmers in FO & FPOs given

    board member positions Institutional viability Increased bargaining power for

    input purchase and output

    marketing Reduce social conflicts and risks

    and enhance welfare athousehold level

    Improved food and nutritionalvalue

    Leadership role of producers intechnology absorption

    Positive health and nutritionimpact on consumers

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    42/52

    Page | 42

    15 CONCLUSIONAgricultural practices are the major component of the livelihood for the people of Jhabua district.

    It constitutes the backbone of rural livelihood security system of this area people through which

    local employment and income generation, and to enhance the quality of life of people living in

    villages. If given support by the government and non-government organization in terms of better

    supply chain management system it can certainly provide the producer company concept has

    change the mind set of rural framers.

    Community institution has developed the cultural based with economy a substantial growth.

    Preliminary market for business for agricultural products has been developing. The tribal region

    districts are less developed in terms of infrastructure, i.e., electricity, roads and irrigation. The

    inter-district inequality in infrastructure leads to increasing disparity in terms of income and

    livelihood between the hills and the plains. The rural market of this area has a huge demand base

    and offers great opportunities to marketers.

    Rural markets of this region face the critical issues of Distribution, Understanding the rural

    consumer, Communication and Poor infrastructure. The marketer has to strengthen the

    distribution, communication and information system. The rural consumer expects value for

    money and owing to has unsteady and measly status of weekly income; increasing the household

    income and improving distribution are the viable strategies that have to be adapted to tap the

    immense potential of the market.

    Facilitate the rural people and the organizations to influence institutions (including rules, laws,

    regulations) and policies of relevance to rural poverty reduction requires strengthening the

    capacity of the rural people and their organizations. Concretely this implies institutional

    transformation, developing and strengthening the organizations of the farmer to confront the

    issues they define as critical increasing access to knowledge so that poor people can grasp

    opportunities and overcome obstacles; expanding the influence that the poor exert over publicpolicy and institutions, including local and national governments; and enhancing their bargaining

    power in the marketplace.

    The producer company required helps at different stages of maturity in their functioning with the

    support from GVT. Recognizing the importance of putting these institutions on the path to

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    43/52

    Page | 43

    sustainability, GVT is repositioning itself as a service provider to the producer company. It will

    take time it is not be a simple process. Producer company concept & formation of sustainable

    supply chain for their product with the help of cooperative still new for the tribal region. This

    producer will primarily focus on marketing agricultural products throughout local area & District

    Mandi at a reasonable price.

    Producer company as a part of any economy has untapped potential; marketers have realized the

    opportunity recently. Improvement in infrastructure and reach, promise a bright future for those

    intending to go rural. Rural consumers are keen on branded goods nowadays, so the market size

    for products and services seems to have flourished.

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    44/52

    Page | 44

    16 ANNEXURE-1Project Objective: 1 Mobilising farmers in groups and build their

    associations (FPOs) to plan and implement product

    specific cluster/ commercial crop cyclesActivities Outputs Outcomes

    Organize farmer into informalgroup(FG)

    Train members and leaders inmatters relating to group

    functioning, group norms andsystems.

    Form associations/FPOs ofFGs.

    Train members and leaders ofFPOs to nurture FGs and

    mediate vis--vis externalresource institutions such as

    government, financialinstitutions and markets.

    3000-4000 farmers from8-10 villages in close

    geographic custerorganized into FGs

    prepared for intensivevegetable/pulse based

    livelihoods interventions. FGs organized into

    FPOs/Informalassociations supporting

    productivity, efficientaccess to input and

    output markets, linkageswith agriculture

    programs. 75% meet or exceed

    quality benchmarks ongroup functioning

    Farmers in 80% FGs

    confident and keen to

    positively change their

    current condition and

    have developed plans to

    synergise planning and

    market access on the

    cluster-identified

    cproducts

    Project Objective: 2 Strengthen farmer capacity through agricultural best

    practices for enhanced productivity

    Activities Outputs Outcomes

    Conduct exposure for selectedmen and women from projectvillages to villages/ farms

    practicing modern farmingmethods, such as different

    crop mixes, moderntechniques and intensive

    farming.

    Discuss alternate farmingsystems with groups offarmers suitable to their

    specific situations andgenerate household farming

    plans/ portfolios. Identify training and

    extension needs and potential

    60% of all familiesinterested to take upimproved crops have

    access to quality inputs. 40 % of participant land

    brought into intensivefarming

    80% families cultivate adiversified basket oflocally suitable crops.

    LRP training modulesbeing implemented inlarge number.

    Trained LRPs supportingimplementation of the

    household and cluster

    Participatingfamilies haveassured supply

    of quality inputsand services,

    Network ofinput and

    services

    deliverymechanismsdeveloped in the

    local area. Participating

    families feelconfident to

    intensify their

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    45/52

    Page | 45

    LRPs to function as

    community based extensionagents.

    Train LRPs to provideextension support to farmers

    adopting new farmingsystems.

    level farm plans agriculture.

    Project Objective: 3 Ensuring access to and usage of quality inputs andservices for intensive agriculture enhancing cluster

    competitiveness

    Activities Outputs Outcomes

    Helping families accessworking capital from

    SHG/MFI, banking sector andother sources.

    Link / develop supplychannels for inputs and

    services: On-field handholding support

    by LRPs to ensure appropriate

    usage of quality inputs Demonstration of usage and

    effectiveness of relevant farmmechanisation practice

    70 % of participatingfamilies using quality

    inputs PCs/Producer

    Aggregations promoted,families covered by these

    collectives Gross Crop Output per

    hectare increase by 100

    % in rupee value terms

    Participatingfamilies have

    assured supplyof quality inputs

    and services, Network of

    input andservicesdelivery

    mechanismsdeveloped in the

    local area.

    Project Objective: 4 Facilitate access to fair & remunerative markets

    including linking producer groups to marketing

    opportunities by market aggregators

    Activities Outputs Outcomes

    Developing productionclusters for producing

    significant volume ofmarketable surplus

    Identifying and buildingaggregation / desegregation

    centers in production clusterwherever required

    Linking these clusters withmarket players (e.g. vegetable

    traders, commission agents,retailers, etc.)

    Producer collectives takingoutput marketing

    Formation of PC

    Intensive, marketoriented production

    clusters developed. Surplus produce

    marketed at remunerativeprices.

    participant familiesengaged in coordinated

    market-orientedproduction

    Producers collectivesaggregate and market

    produce from members. Market aggregators/

    retail chains buy producefrom producer collectives

    Sustainable andcompetitive

    linkages formarketing exist

    for theirproduce,

    families inproduction

    clusters havemultiple options

    to sell farmproduce,

    The prevailingrates in the

    cluster are fairvis--vis large

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    46/52

    Page | 46

    Annexure-2

    Energising Farm Production Systems: Institutional Arrangements for Transition to

    Coordinated Surplus Frame:-

    markets in the

    region.

    Farmer Producers Organization

    1000 Farmers Gross Intervened Area : 30-50 ha 25 Villages Productivity : 75% of benchmark 50-70 Primary Group Price : 50 % of Retail 20-25 Kisan

    Sahyogi Incremental Income : Rs.15000 per farmer

    Board of Directors

    Farmer+Expert+Bank CEO

    Gram Kisan Mandal/Farmers Group 15-20 farmers in 1 villages serviced by aKisan Sahyogi and accessing farm business services - inputs, equipment hire,

    output pooling & storage from a single node

    Kisan SahyogiVillage Based Extension Cadre/LRP assists in on-field agronomic practices &

    in ut-out ut transactions 30-40 farmers (2 FG in 1-2 villa es in 3-5 km. radius

    Agriculture Specialist Supports 10-15 Sahyogi in field implementation. Expected

    to create a bestfit adaptation of RSP (Recommended Scientific Practices) infield conditions. 1000 Farmers in 25 villages

    Business Manager

    Chief Executive Officer of the Producer Company. Expand Farm- Business Efficiency

    Frontiers. Builds Linkage with Resource & Research Institutions & Market.

    Farmers

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    47/52

    Page | 47

    Annexure-3

    GENERAL INFORMATION VOLUNTEER

    101.

    Information Name

    Respondents Name

    Gender Male/Female

    Village Name

    District

    State

    102.

    Caste

    Category

    Religion House Type

    FC 1 Hindu 1 Concerete 1

    BC 2 Muslim 2 Thatched 2

    SC 3 Christian 3 Mixed 3

    ST 4 Other 4 Other 4

    If other, then specifiedEducation Qualification of the respondent:-

    Annual Income:-

    103. Household: Background Information

    Category Number

    Number of adult males:

    Number of adult females:

    Number of Child :-

    Boys:Girls:

    104.

    Capital Assets

    Number

    A) BullockB) CowC) Buffalo

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    48/52

    Page | 48

    D) GoatE) TractorF) Motorcycle/ScooterG) RadioH) TV B/WI) TV C/WJ) VCRK) Electric FanL) CycleM)Telephone

    Phone no-

    105.

    Irrigation Assets

    A) Open WellB) Bore wellC) Electric pump SetD)

    Diesel Pump Set

    E) PondF) CanalG) StreamH) Other

    106.

    Source of livelihood

    Primary occupation Secondary occupation

    1. Farming 1. Farming2. Carpentry 2. Carpentry3. Services 3. Services4. Business 4. Business5. Live stock 5. Live stock6. Other 6. Other

    If other, then specified

    107.Total Land Holding:

    108.

    109.

    Type of Land

    Irrigated Land Rain fed Lowland Upland Medium Land Other(Specify)

    Land Type in AcreCultivated land uncultivated land Irrigated Land Forest Land

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    49/52

    Page | 49

    110.

    INPUTSREQUIRED:

    201. What type of fertilizer are you using? (Per acre)

    Bio Fertilizer Chemical Fertilizer Both

    Urea DAP MOP Zinc

    HowMuch(per

    acre)

    Price(peracre)

    SEED:

    301. What type of seed are you using?

    A. Breeder B. Foundation C. Certified D. T.L E. Own seed302. Are you involved in Seed Production? Yes/No

    If Yes, Which seed do you produce?

    303. Are you sell the seed? Yes/ No

    If yes, at what price per Quintal & where?

    304. Do you get any subsidy from Govt.?

    Yes/No

    If Yes, How much?

    Type Of Crop(In acre)

    Wheat Gram Soya been Corn

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    50/52

    Page | 50

    305. Which type of variety do you use?

    Crop

    Soya been Gram Wheat Maize

    Variety Name

    MARKET

    401. Where do you purchase the seed?

    A. Localmarket

    B. Dealer C. Co-operative D. KVK E. Other

    402. Where you are selling the produce (Wheat, Soya been, corn, Gram)?

    A. LocalMarket

    B. Co-operative

    C. APMC D. Mandi E. Whole salemarket

    403. What is the price at different market?

    Market Price/ Quintal

    Soya been Gram Wheat Maize

    Local Market

    Cooperative

    APMC

    Mandi

    Whole sale Market

    404. Mode of Transport

    405. Cost incurred in transportation?

    406. Do you have any storage Facility?

    A. YesB. NoIf Yes (Where?)

    407. Distance of the nearby market from your villages.

    501.COST OF CULTIVATION

    Crop

    Soya been wheat Gram Maize

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    51/52

    Page | 51

    601.PRODUCTION

    Cost of

    inputs

    Seed

    FertilizerInsecticide

    PesticideFungicide

    CulturalCrop Production

    Cost oflabour

    BroadcastingHand weeding

    Fertilizer applicationPlant protection

    IrrigationHarvesting

    Post harvesting

    Cost of

    machinery

    Tillage

    SeedingHarvesting

    Irrigation

    Cost of

    power

    Total

    Crop Area(in acre) Amt. of seed Sown Quantity of produce

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    2008-09 2009-10

    2010-11 2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    Soya been

    Wheat

    Gram

    Maize

    Crop Own use Sold

    2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

    Soya been

    Wheat

  • 8/2/2019 MTS-II Final Report

    52/52

    602.IMPACTS OF AN INCREASE IN COST OF WHEAT CULTIVATION

    A. What have been the impacts of the increase in cost of Soya bean cultivation?a. Reduction of investment in wheat cultivation whilst area constant or increasedb. Diversification of crops in other seasonsc. Adopting other monsoon cropsd. Other please (specify)

    Gram

    Maize

    Migration

    Hamlet Nos. Reasons for migration Duration of migration Places of migration

    5 years ago 2011