Upload
elinor-williamson
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mu2e Experiment and Issues
Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012
R. Coleman 2
Mu2e talks Today
Now: Mu2e Experiment and Issues Overview, Status of Project, Production & Transport
Solenoids
16:30 Superconducting Magnets of Mu2e- Michael Lamm
17:00 Mu2e Production Solenoid- Vadim Kashikhin
Tuesday 16:00 Radiation Studies for Mu2e Magnets- Vitaly
Pronskikh
Special Thanks to: R. Bernstein, J. Miller, D. Glenzinski, for some material used
2/13/12
R. Coleman 3
Introduction
• Mu2e experiment is a search for Charged Lepton Flavor Violation (CLFV) via the coherent conversion of m-Ne-N
• In wide array of New Physics models CLFV processes occur at rates we can observe with next generation experiments
• The proposed experiment uses current proton source at Fermilab with some modifications
• Target sensitivity has great discovery potential
2/13/12
R. Coleman 4 2/13/12
R. Coleman 5 2/13/12
R. Coleman 6
Beam Intensity and Pulsed Proton Beam
• Deliver high flux m- beam to stopping target • proton flux ~6 x 1012 /sec at 8 GeV (8 kW)• ~2 x 1010 Hz m- , 1018 total, 4 conversion e- at Rme~10-16
• 103 more muons than SINDRUM II previous best limt
• Pulsed Proton beam – Wait 670 ns to reduce prompt background, extinction = 10-10 using Debuncher Ring and oscillating (AC) dipole sweeper in external proton beamline m(Al)=864 ns
2/13/12
R. Coleman 7 2/13/12
Pulsed Beam and Radiative Pion Capture Background
Wait ~ 700 nsreduced 1011
time (ns)
R. Coleman 8
Protons from 8 GeV Booster to Mu2e
New beamline shared by Mu2e and g-2
2/13/12
Steve Werkema
9R. Coleman
Muon Campus for Mu2e and g-2 with Cryo Plant
Compressed He from existing TeV
compressors
Three TeV refrigeratorsinstalled in MC-1
Cold He lines to experiments
g-2 building (MC-1) has evolved to support needs of g-2 and Mu2e• Low bay is Muon Campus Cryo Building• Medium Bay will house beamline power supplies and equipment.
New transfer line forcompressed He builtfrom recycled parts
2/13/12
R. Coleman 10
Mu2eg-2
2/13/12
Schedule
R. Coleman 11 2/13/12
R. Coleman 12
MECO at BNL
m/p ~ 10-4 vs
conventional ~10-8
1996-2005
1989
MELC at Moscow
2/13/12
COMET at J-PARC: proposal Nov 2007 & Mu2e at FNAL: proposal Oct 2008
R. Coleman 13
Mu2e Apparatus
• Mu2e experiment consists of 3 solenoid systems
ProductionSolenoid
TransportSolenoid
DetectorSolenoid
ProductionTarget Collimators
StoppingTarget Tracker Calorimeter
(not shown: Cosmic Ray Veto, Proton Dump, Muon Dump, Proton/Neutron absorbers, Extinction Monitor, Stopping Monitor)
2/13/12
R. Coleman 14
Mu2e Apparatus
• Mu2e experiment consists of 3 solenoid systems
ProductionSolenoid
TransportSolenoid
DetectorSolenoid
ProductionTarget Collimators
StoppingTarget Tracker Calorimeter
(not shown: Cosmic Ray Veto, Proton Dump, Muon Dump, Proton/Neutron absorbers, Extinction Monitor, Stopping Monitor)
protons
2.5T~5T
2.0T
1.0T
e-
m-, p-
2/13/12
R. Coleman 15 2/13/12
Goals:—Transport low energy
m- to the detector solenoid —Minimize transport of positive
particles and high energy particles—Minimize transport of neutral particles- curved section—Absorb antiprotons in a thin window—Minimize particles with long transit time
Transport SolenoidInner radius=24 cmLength=13.11 mTS1: L=1 mTS2: R=2.9 mTS3: L=2 mTS4: R=2.9 mTS5: L=1 m
R. Coleman 16 2/13/12
Charge, Momentum Selection and Rejection of Long-lived Particles
R. Coleman 17
Muon Flux- before and after Transport Solenoid
Negative Muons
Positive Muons
p(MeV)
p(MeV)2/13/12
R. Coleman 18 2/13/12
Muons Reaching the Stopping Target in the Detector Solenoid
R. Coleman 19
Production Solenoid
2/13/12
L= radius
R. Coleman 20 2/13/12
Heat and Radiation Shield Dimensions from Simulation
0.6 m 1.4 m
4 m
See Vitaly Pronskikh’s talktomorrow
25 kW
8 kW
W Cu
W
Cu
Bronze
R. Coleman 21
Some Early Comparisons to MECO (2009)
2/13/12
R. Coleman 22
Muon Yield vs Bmax Production SolenoidGraded Field Bmin =2.5 T
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Bmax (T)
Relative Muon Yield
MECO
Mu2e
Study of Muon Yield vs Maximum Field in Production Solenoid
2/13/12
R. Coleman 23
Target z position Study (2009)
muon yield vs target position in Production Solenoid
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
z (m)
Relative muon yield
Mu2e- g4beamline
MECO GEANT3
2/13/12
R. Coleman 24
0 m
1 m
COMET
MECO
400
1400
5200
Joint Meeting in Berkeley Jan 2009with COMET group- direct comparisonsdifficult due to differing physics models
2/13/12
R. Coleman 25
Sergei Striganov improved fit for Mu2e2009, similar fits by Bob Bernstein
File of pions weighted by HARP data used
2/13/12
R. Coleman 26
Stopped Muon Yield vs Initial Pion Kinetic Energy
1
10
100
1000
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600
Kinetic Energy (MeV)
Stopped Muons per 1E6 incident protons
Stopped Muon Yield vs Initial Pion Angle
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
cos angle
Stopped Muons per 1E6 incident protons
Pion Production- what energies and angles are important?
~60% from 20-60 MeV kinetic energy or p = 77- 143 MeV
2/13/12
R. Coleman 27
Increase Field in Short PS from 4T to 5T max field
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-2000-1000010002000300040005000
z(mm)
Bz(T)
Use HARPStandard PS-5Tmax
Short PS- 4T max Short PS- 5T max
Mu- hitting stoppingtarget
1955 1603 1917
Mu- stopping 1280 970 1109
Relative stopped yield =1.00 0.76 0.87
2/13/12
MECO
R. Coleman 28
Optimize target z position for Stopped muon yield for L= 4m Mu2e PS
2/13/12
With this target location muon yield is down ~ 7%with L=4 m vs L=5.2 m (MECO)
Some cost savings reducing L, but most important feature isDPA requirements can be satisfied in region where proton beam exits PS- see Vitaly’s talk tomorrow
0.2 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.7 4.20.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
z(m)
R. Coleman 29
Production Solenoid- Some Engineering Aspects – Heat Shield
2/13/12
25 kW versionRequires Tungsten $$$Heat Transfer issues
8.3 kW current version
R. Coleman 30
Exploded view showing radiation labyrinths and all parts
Bolt-on rails
13.6 tons 12.4
tons13.2 tons 6.6 tons
L. BartoszekBARTOSZEK
ENGINEERING
The Mu2e All-Bronze Heat and Radiation Shield Design
2/13/12
46 tons total
R. Coleman 31
Status of Heat Shield Engineering
We have to build drawings on all-bronze 8.3 kW
3 cost estimates, very consistent, significant savings in 8.3 kW version over 25 kW version which uses tungsten
Thermal analysis in progress, not expected to be a problem
Need to explore other materials (Copper, Copper/Nickel)
Continue simulations to optimize design
2/13/12
R. Coleman 32
Backup Slides
2/13/12
R. Coleman 33 2/13/12
R. Coleman 34 2/13/12
R. Coleman 35
Electron Flash and Middle-Collimator
All particles
negative muons electrons
e/m ~20 -> 1 & stopped m reduced 20%
2/13/12
R. Coleman 36
e- / - flux entering the Detector Solenoid
e-
-
Momentum (MeV/c)
2/13/12
R. Coleman 37
Time distribution entering Detector Solenoid
-
e-
Time (ns)2/13/12
R. Coleman 38 2/13/125/3/11 38
Time vs p - negative muons reaching stopping target
MECO PS
Mu2e PS
R. Coleman 39
pp=54 MeV scatters to ~0 pitch anglein pbar windowpbar window
TS with gradient
TS without gradient
t= ~900 ns
t= ~200 ns
2/13/12
R. Coleman 40
Study of the Production Solenoid Gradient vs Muon Yield
normal time distribution
positive gradient leads to long times
2/13/12
R. Coleman 41 2/13/12
R. Coleman 42 2/13/12