Upload
melba
View
38
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Jan Ridky and Petr Travnicek Inst. of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague for DELPHI collaboration. Muon Bundles from Cosmic Ray Showers Detected by DELPHI at LEP. Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004. Detection of cosmic rays at LEP. ALEPH (140 m, E cut = 70 GeV). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Jan Ridky and Petr TravnicekInst. of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague
for DELPHI collaboration
Muon Bundles from Cosmic Ray Showers Detected by
DELPHI at LEP
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Detection of cosmic rays at LEP
DELPHI (100 m, Ecut
= 50 GeV)ALEPH (140 m, E
cut = 70 GeV)
L3 (30 m, Ecut
= 15 GeV)Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Simulationand detection
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Description of the overburden5 layers with proper rock density& experimental cavern description
differentkinds of molasses
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Detektor DELPHIMUB
HCAL
TOF
TPC
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Typical high multiplicity event
RUN 107634, EVT 4731
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Saturated event
… we have 6 such cases
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Data selection - DELPHI cosmic triggercoincidence of 3 sectors in TOF,parasitic data taking to e+e- and several dedicated cosmic runs
Duty cycle of LEP total live time 1.6 106 s
Nmuons
> 4
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Projected angle background rejectionHCAL projected angle
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
4 saturated events
2 saturated events (MUB)
#event s Mul . >30 54201 Mul . >30 1065 Mul . >70 78 Mul . >100 21
1999, 2000
Muon multiplicity
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Saturated events● too many hits, reconstruction in HCAL fails● 6 such events, parallel ‘tracks’ of un-hit tubes -> cosmic● 2 events in MUB multiplicity >150
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
MC comparisons Which model provides more muons?
LDF of p > 50 GeV muons => QGSJET > SIBYLL > DPMJET
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
HCAL – MC (QGSJET) vs. DATA
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
rock density cross-talk
Systematic errors – rock density, cross-talk
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Simulations – supposed flux
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
HCAL – MC (QGSJET) vs. DATA
flux no. 1
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Comparison – MC vs. DATA
flux 1, 2, 3- influence of the flux of primary particlesJan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Simulations – energy contributions – flux 1
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Simulations – energy contributions – flux 1
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
TPC sky plot (galactic coordinates), HCAL multiplicity > 15
Jan Ridky, ISVHECRI, Pylos, Greece, 6-12 Sept. 2004
Other LEP results
AlephDelphi
multiplicity
L3-C
Conclusions
DELPHI cosmic data in qualitative agreement with other LEP measurements (L3+C).
High energy models fail to describe muon multiplicity
Data are sensitive to the dynamics of the high energy interactions (talk of Jörg Hörandel)
Cosmic data …. the only measurement at LEP unexplained by theory