Upload
wood
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
MYTHS OF NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION. Why this class will not make you an all-knowing, infallible judge of others’ nonverbal cues. Myth 1: You can read a person like a book. The reality. Nonverbal cues can be perceived and interpreted, but not “read.” The term body “language” is misleading. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Why this class will not make you an all-knowing, infallible judge of others’ nonverbal cues
• Nonverbal cues can be perceived and interpreted, but not “read.”– The term body “language” is
misleading.– Nonverbal communication is not
a language.– Nonverbal communication has
no grammar, no syntax.• If you could read a person like
a book:– No one could successfully lie to
another person.– Poker players couldn’t bluff.– Undercover cops would be
exposed.– Relationships would be
damaged.
• There is no one-to-one correspondence between a specific nonverbal cue and its meaning.– direct eye contact could
signal attraction or hostility.
• Nonverbal behavior is highly idiosyncratic– It varies greatly from
person to person.
• 93% of the meaning or impact is communicated nonverbally (Mehrabian & Ferris, 1967; Mehrabian & Weiner, 1967)
• “No more than 30 to 35 percent of the social meaning of a conversation or interaction is carried by words” (Birdwhistle, 1970, p. 158)
• Mehrabian (1972, 1981) the face conveys 55% of the emotional meaning of a message, vocal cues convey 38%, as little as 7% is communicated verbally.
• The exact percentage is an unknowable statistic.
• If you watched a film in a foreign language would you understand 93% of it?
• If police were investigating a crime, and the only witness were a mime, would they obtain 93% of the information they needed?
• If you watched a stand-up comedian while wearing earplugs, would she/he be just as funny?
• We can’t hide our true feelings.– Nonverbal communication is
reflexive.• People can’t help but leak
nonverbal cues.– People give off “natural
signs” about what they are thinking and feeling.
• Nonverbal communication is more trustworthy, believable.
• Nonverbal communication is a powerful medium.
• The majority of the emotional or affective meaning is carried via the nonverbal channel.
• When there is a contradiction between verbal and nonverbal cues, people tend to assign more weight to the nonverbal message.
• Nonverbal cues convey generalized feelings and mood states.– mad, angry, upset,
frustrated• Words provide more
subtle, nuanced expressions of feeling.– furious, peeved, irate,
livid, outraged, riled up, in a huff, pissed off, ticked off, infuriated, miffed
• Nonverbal communication often operates at a low level of awareness– Or even unconsciously
• Nonverbal behavior can also be highly conscious and strategic– fake laughter– feigning interest– crocodile tears– fake orgasm
• Most people consider themselves good judges of emotion.– Self-serving bias– Confirmation bias
• A person’s expressive repertoire can be used deceptively.
People may assume that nonverbal behavior is instinctive or part of “human nature.”• Biologically innate• Evolutionarily adaptive
Charles Darwin, The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals
Universality of basic emotional expressions
1. Anger2. Disgust3. Fear4. Happiness5. Sadness6. Surprise 7. Contempt
Cross-cultural similarities do exist.
There are some cultural universals, however…
Fear and disgust are easily confused
Blended facial expressions are more culture-bound• Sarcastic smile, smirk, smug
look Cultural displays rules
moderate emotional displays
Example: When people sit, where should their legs and feet go?
Gender differences
Cultural differences
1. Slight sadness2. Disgust3. Slight enjoyment4. Slight or highly
controlled anger5. Slight or highly
controlled fear6. Masked anger7. Fear or surprise8. Contempt, smug,
or disdainful9. Worry,
apprehension, controlled fear
Movies and TV shows perpetuate this myth• Lie To Me• Casino Royale
Cops vastly overestimate their deception detection skills
Jurors overestimate their deception detection skills
Laypersons believe liars leak cues to deception via:• Gaze avoidance• Postural shifting• Response latency
On average, people are about 54% accurate in detecting deception.
Cops fare no better than college students
The three most common “signs” are false correlates of deception.
Liars do not necessarily look up and to the left• NLP is unreliable