NAG_LAL

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1

NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores

2006-2014

Core Area Grades 3 through 5


Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg

Grade 3 87.1% 89.5% 92.4% 69.8% 67.9% 70.6% 77.9% 73.0% 75.6% 78.5%

Grade 4 87.7% 86.0% 88.2% 73.4% 69.6% 74.6% 66.9% 69.2% 73.3% 76.9%

Grade 5 93.9% 93.9% 66.9% 78.3% 72.1% 71.5% 72.4% 71.8% 70.8% 77.6%

Includes: Bloomingdale, Butler, Kinnelon, Lincoln Park, Oakland, Pequannock, Pompton Lakes, Ringwood,

Riverdale, Wanaque, West Milford, and Wayne

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau

NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores 2006-2014

Suburban Trends Area


NJASK Language Arts & Literacy

Core Study Area Score Averages 2006-2014

School

District Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequannock Pompton Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West MilfordTotal Area

Average

2014

Gr. 3 74.4% 57.9% 87.2% 81.7% 81.6% 86.0% 74.0% 67.5% 84.0% 68.0% 70.3% 74.5% 75.6%

Gr. 4 52.7% 67.5% 80.6% 65.8% 89.8% 78.0% 67.0% 73.0% 70.0% 71.5% 73.9% 69.5% 73.3%

Gr. 5 70.8% 59.1% 75.9% 69.2% 87.1% 79.0% 71.0% 72.0% 64.0% 65.0% 67.6% 69.3% 70.8%

2013

Gr. 3 67.0% 54.0% 88.0% 72.0% 81.7% 86.0% 74.0% 67.5% 84.0% 68.0% 70.3% 74.5% 73.9%

Gr. 4 60.0% 62.0% 76.0% 59.0% 76.3% 78.0% 67.0% 73.0% 70.0% 71.5% 73.9% 69.5% 70.6%

Gr. 5 60.0% 71.0% 84.0% 76.0% 88.0% 79.0% 71.0% 72.0% 64.0% 65.0% 67.6% 69.3% 73.4%

2012

Gr. 3 78.0% 53.0% 81.0% 89.0% 90.3% 88.7% 71.0% 83.0% 71.0% 74.0% 83.3% 72.8% 77.9%

Gr. 4 57.0% 41.0% 66.0% 69.0% 82.3% 76.0% 67.0% 65.0% 74.0% 72.0% 59.8% 67.2%

Gr. 5 73.0% 61.0% 89.0% 84.0% 86.3% 83.3% 71.0% 64.0% 55.0% 57.5% 72.4% 69.3% 72.1%

2011

Gr. 3 60.2% 53.2% 84.8% 72.9% 86.9% 79.8% 66.6% 69.1% 67.8% 66.2% 71.3% 61.5% 70.9%

Gr. 4 56.4% 60.8% 84.1% 86.3% 89.2% 81.5% 74.3% 70.4% 82.2% 52.9% 73.7% 73.7% 75.4%

Gr. 5 67.6% 64.7% 82.7% 73.8% 81.2% 80.2% 60.7% 73.9% 71.4% 51.9% 69.2% 71.7% 71.0%

2010

Gr. 3 60.3% 57.2% 81.2% 83.8% 83.1% 80.2% 71.0% 71.0% 56.0% 51.4% 65.8% 67.5% 69.8%

Gr. 4 47.9% 70.1% 82.7% 80.5% 81.4% 83.5% 72.9% 72.9% 60.7% 53.8% 69.2% 71.1% 72.6%

Gr. 5 65.3% 60.3% 79.6% 82.2% 91.2% 86.9% 70.1% 70.1% 61.3% 55.2% 69.6% 73.1% 72.7%

2009

Gr. 3 45.2% 54.4% 80.0% 77.5% 83.5% 86.3% 61.8% 74.1% 79.3% 55.1% 70.2% 70.2% 72.0%

Gr. 4 66.2% 66.3% 74.6% 73.3% 90.7% 87.8% 69.5% 69.7% 81.3% 51.9% 75.7% 74.1% 74.1%

Gr. 5 62.5% 66.7% 89.9% 88.6% 89.8% 89.0% 79.1% 73.8% 79.4% 62.6% 76.2% 82.5% 79.8%

2008

Gr. 3 94.0% 93.2% 93.3% 97.6% 94.8% 96.3% 86.7% 94.2% 88.9% 86.6% 93.0% 90.2% 92.3%

Gr. 4 84.8% 85.0% 94.5% 89.8% 92.4% 94.4% 85.5% 87.8% 87.1% 77.9% 91.1% 88.1% 88.5%

Gr. 5 51.6% 46.3% 84.6% 78.3% 86.4% 79.8% 70.4% 57.5% 63.3% 41.4% 71.8% 71.5% 68.3%

2007

Gr. 3 75.9% 83.8% 96.9% 89.0% 95.8% 93.9% 92.3% 91.9% 90.0% 84.0% 89.3% 91.2% 90.7%

Gr. 4 83.8% 76.1% 92.1% 94.9% 94.9% 94.0% 91.9% 82.0% 68.7% 73.9% 89.9% 89.5% 86.2%

Gr. 5 78.9% 87.9% 96.4% 96.2% 98.4% 97.0% 95.7% 94.1% 96.5% 94.9% 95.7% 95.1% 95.3%

2006

Gr. 3 68.8% 82.4% 94.1% 93.1% 95.5% 91.1% 91.1% 84.0% 80.0% 83.1% 91.0% 91.3% 88.8%

Gr. 4 79.9% 83.1% 93.2% 90.4% 97.1% 88.6% 94.7% 84.9% 82.7% 80.9% 89.4% 87.6% 88.4%

Gr. 5 92.7% 90.0% 98.9% 90.4% 96.9% 96.6% 94.3% 93.5% 100.0% 81.7% 94.4% 96.3% 93.9%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

20

06

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

14

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

88.8% 88.4%

93.9% 90.7%

86.2%

95.3% 92.3%

88.5%

68.3%

72.0% 74.1%

79.8%

69.8% 72.6% 72.7%

70.9%

75.4% 71.0%

77.9%

67.2%

72.1% 73.9%

70.6%

73.4% 77.6%

69.5% 72.6%

NJASK LAL Core Study Averages by Grade

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3%

2 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8%

3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%

4 Ringwood 94.2% 87.8% 57.5%

5 Bloomingdale 94.0% 84.8% 51.6%

6 Kinnelon 93.3% 94.5% 84.6%

7 Butler 93.2% 85.0% 46.3%

8 Wayne 93.0% 91.1% 71.8%

9 West Milford 90.2% 88.1% 71.5%

10 Riverdale 88.9% 87.1% 63.3%

11 Pompton Lakes 86.7% 85.5% 70.4%

12 Wanaque 86.6% 77.9% 41.4%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%

2 Lincoln Park 89.0% 69.0% 84.0%

3 Pequannock 88.7% 76.0% 83.3%

4 Wayne 83.3% 72.0% 72.4%

5 Ringwood 83.0% 64.0%

6 Kinnelon 81.0% 66.0% 89.0%

7 Bloomingdale 78.0% 57.0% 73.0%

8 Wanaque 74.0% 74.0% 57.5%

9 West Milford 72.8% 59.8% 69.3%

10 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 67.0% 71.0%

11 Riverdale 71.0% 65.0% 55.0%

12 Butler 53.0% 41.0% 61.0%


2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 87.2% 80.6% 75.9%

2 Pequannock 83.5% 78.7% 77.4%

3 Lincoln Park 81.7% 65.8% 69.2%

4 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%

5 Pompton Lakes 80.6% 64.3% 65.5%

6 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5%

7 West Milford 78.4% 65.9% 72.4%

8 Wayne 77.9% 69.9% 72.6%

9 Riverdale 75.7% 63.9% 62.2%

10 Bloomingdale 74.4% 52.7% 70.8%

11 Wanaque 73.4% 52.0% 58.4%

12 Butler 57.9% 67.5% 59.1%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 88.0% 76.0% 84.0%

2 Pequannock 86.0% 78.0% 79.0%

3 Riverdale 84.0% 70.0% 64.0%

4 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%

5 West Milford 74.5% 69.5% 69.3%

6 Pompton Lakes 74.0% 67.0% 71.0%

7 Lincoln Park 72.0% 59.0% 76.0%

8 Wayne 70.3% 73.9% 67.6%

9 Wanaque 68.0% 71.5% 65.0%

10 Ringwood 67.5% 73.0% 72.0%

11 Bloomingdale 67.0% 60.0% 60.0%

12 Butler 54.0% 62.0% 71.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%

2 Kinnelon 84.8% 84.1% 82.7%

3 Pequannock 79.8% 81.5% 80.2%

4 Lincoln Park 72.9% 86.3% 73.8%

5 Wayne 71.3% 73.7% 69.2%

6 Ringwood 69.1% 70.4% 73.9%

7 Riverdale 67.8% 82.2% 71.4%

8 Pompton Lakes 66.6% 74.3% 60.7%

9 Wanaque 66.2% 52.9% 51.9%

10 West Milford 61.5% 73.7% 71.7%

11 Bloomingdale 60.2% 56.4% 67.6%

12 Butler 53.2% 60.8% 64.7%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 83.8% 80.5% 82.2%

2 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%

3 Kinnelon 81.2% 82.7% 79.6%

4 Pequannock 80.2% 83.5% 86.9%

5 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 72.9% 70.1%

6 Ringwood 71.0% 72.9% 70.1%

7 West Milford 67.5% 71.1% 73.1%

8 Wayne 65.8% 69.2% 69.6%

9 Bloomingdale 60.3% 47.9% 65.3%

10 Butler 57.2% 70.1% 60.3%

11 Riverdale 56.0% 60.7% 61.3%

12 Wanaque 51.4% 53.8% 55.2%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 86.3% 87.8% 89.0%

2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%

3 Kinnelon 80.0% 74.6% 89.9%

4 Riverdale 79.3% 81.3% 79.4%

5 Lincoln Park 77.5% 73.3% 88.6%

6 Ringwood 74.1% 69.7% 73.8%

7 Wayne 70.2% 75.7% 76.2%

8 West Milford 70.2% 74.1% 82.5%

9 Pompton Lakes 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%

10 Wanaque 55.1% 51.9% 62.6%

11 Butler 54.4% 66.3% 66.7%

12 Bloomingdale 45.2% 66.2% 62.5%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 96.9% 92.1% 96.4%

2 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

3 Pequannock 96.4% 93.5% 97.4%

4 Pompton Lakes 92.3% 91.9% 95.7%

5 Ringwood 91.9% 82.0% 94.1%

6 West Milford 91.2% 89.5% 95.1%

7 Riverdale 90.0% 68.7% 96.5%

8 Wayne 89.3% 89.9% 95.7%

9 Lincoln Park 89.0% 94.9% 96.2%

10 Wanaque 84.0% 73.9% 94.9%

11 Butler 83.8% 76.1% 87.9%

12 Bloomingdale 75.9% 83.8% 78.9%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%

2 Kinnelon 94.1% 93.2% 98.9%

3 Lincoln Park 93.1% 90.4% 90.4%

4 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%

5 Pompton Lakes 91.1% 94.7% 94.3%

6 Pequannock 91.1% 88.6% 96.6%

7 Wayne 91.0% 89.4% 94.4%

8 Ringwood 84.0% 84.9% 93.5%

9 Wanaque 83.1% 80.9% 81.7%

10 Butler 82.4% 83.1% 90.0%

11 Riverdale 80.0% 82.7% 100.0%

12 Bloomingdale 68.8% 79.9% 92.7%

NJASK Core Area LAL Rankings by Year - Grade 3


2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%

2 Kinnelon 87.2% 80.6% 75.9%

3 Pequannock 83.5% 78.7% 77.4%

4 Wayne 77.9% 69.9% 72.6%

5 Butler 57.9% 67.5% 59.1%

6 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5%

7 West Milford 78.4% 65.9% 72.4%

8 Lincoln Park 81.7% 65.8% 69.2%

9 Pompton Lakes 80.6% 64.3% 65.5%

10 Riverdale 75.7% 63.9% 62.2%

11 Bloomingdale 74.4% 52.7% 70.8%

12 Wanaque 73.4% 52.0% 58.4%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 86.0% 78.0% 79.0%

2 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%

3 Kinnelon 88.0% 76.0% 84.0%

4 Wayne 70.3% 73.9% 67.6%

5 Ringwood 67.5% 73.0% 72.0%

6 Wanaque 68.0% 71.5% 65.0%

7 Riverdale 84.0% 70.0% 64.0%

8 West Milford 74.5% 69.5% 69.3%

9 Pompton Lakes 74.0% 67.0% 71.0%

10 Butler 54.0% 62.0% 71.0%

11 Bloomingdale 67.0% 60.0% 60.0%

12 Lincoln Park 72.0% 59.0% 76.0%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%

2 Pequannock 88.7% 76.0% 83.3%

3 Wanaque 74.0% 74.0% 57.5%

4 Wayne 83.3% 72.0% 72.4%

5 Lincoln Park 89.0% 69.0% 84.0%

6 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 67.0% 71.0%

7 Kinnelon 81.0% 66.0% 89.0%

8 Riverdale 71.0% 65.0% 55.0%

9 West Milford 72.8% 59.8% 69.3%

10 Bloomingdale 78.0% 57.0% 73.0%

11 Butler 53.0% 41.0% 61.0%

12 Ringwood 83.0% 64.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%

2 Lincoln Park 72.9% 86.3% 73.8%

3 Kinnelon 84.8% 84.1% 82.7%

4 Riverdale 67.8% 82.2% 71.4%

5 Pequannock 79.8% 81.5% 80.2%

6 Pompton Lakes 66.6% 74.3% 60.7%

7 West Milford 61.5% 73.7% 71.7%

8 Wayne 71.3% 73.7% 69.2%

9 Ringwood 69.1% 70.4% 73.9%

10 Butler 53.2% 60.8% 64.7%

11 Bloomingdale 60.2% 56.4% 67.6%

12 Wanaque 66.2% 52.9% 51.9%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 80.2% 83.5% 86.9%

2 Kinnelon 81.2% 82.7% 79.6%

3 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%

4 Lincoln Park 83.8% 80.5% 82.2%

5 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 72.9% 70.1%

6 Ringwood 71.0% 72.9% 70.1%

7 West Milford 67.5% 71.1% 73.1%

8 Butler 57.2% 70.1% 60.3%

9 Wayne 65.8% 69.2% 69.6%

10 Riverdale 56.0% 60.7% 61.3%

11 Wanaque 51.4% 53.8% 55.2%

12 Bloomingdale 60.3% 47.9% 65.3%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%

2 Pequannock 86.3% 87.8% 89.0%

3 Riverdale 79.3% 81.3% 79.4%

4 Wayne 70.2% 75.7% 76.2%

5 Kinnelon 80.0% 74.6% 89.9%

6 West Milford 70.2% 74.1% 82.5%

7 Lincoln Park 77.5% 73.3% 88.6%

8 Ringwood 74.1% 69.7% 73.8%

9 Pompton Lakes 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%

10 Butler 54.4% 66.3% 66.7%

11 Bloomingdale 45.2% 66.2% 62.5%

12 Wanaque 55.1% 51.9% 62.6%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 93.3% 94.5% 84.6%

2 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8%

3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%

4 Wayne 93.0% 91.1% 71.8%

5 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3%

6 West Milford 90.2% 88.1% 71.5%

7 Ringwood 94.2% 87.8% 57.5%

8 Riverdale 88.9% 87.1% 63.3%

9 Pompton Lakes 86.7% 85.5% 70.4%

10 Butler 93.2% 85.0% 46.3%

11 Bloomingdale 94.0% 84.8% 51.6%

12 Wanaque 86.6% 77.9% 41.4%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

2 Lincoln Park 89.0% 94.9% 96.2%

3 Pequannock 92.4% 94.9% 97.3%

4 Kinnelon 96.9% 92.1% 96.4%

5 Pompton Lakes 92.3% 91.9% 95.7%

6 Wayne 89.3% 89.9% 95.7%

7 West Milford 91.2% 89.5% 95.1%

8 Bloomingdale 75.9% 83.8% 78.9%

9 Ringwood 91.9% 82.0% 94.1%

10 Butler 83.8% 76.1% 87.9%

11 Wanaque 84.0% 73.9% 94.9%

12 Riverdale 90.0% 68.7% 96.5%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%

2 Pompton Lakes 91.1% 94.7% 94.3%

3 Kinnelon 94.1% 93.2% 98.9%

4 Lincoln Park 93.1% 90.4% 90.4%

5 Wayne 91.0% 89.4% 94.4%

6 Pequannock 91.1% 88.6% 96.6%

7 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%

8 Ringwood 84.0% 84.9% 93.5%

9 Butler 82.4% 83.1% 90.0%

10 Riverdale 80.0% 82.7% 100.0%

11 Wanaque 83.1% 80.9% 81.7%

12 Bloomingdale 68.8% 79.9% 92.7%



2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Ringwood 79.3% 66.5% 98.5%

2 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%

3 Pequannock 83.5% 78.7% 77.4%

4 Kinnelon 87.2% 80.6% 75.9%

5 Wayne 77.9% 69.9% 72.6%

6 West Milford 78.4% 65.9% 72.4%

7 Bloomingdale 74.4% 52.7% 70.8%

8 Lincoln Park 81.7% 65.8% 69.2%

9 Pompton Lakes 80.6% 64.3% 65.5%

10 Riverdale 75.7% 63.9% 62.2%

11 Butler 57.9% 67.5% 59.1%

12 Wanaque 73.4% 52.0% 58.4%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%

2 Kinnelon 88.0% 76.0% 84.0%

3 Pequannock 86.0% 78.0% 79.0%

4 Lincoln Park 72.0% 59.0% 76.0%

5 Ringwood 67.5% 73.0% 72.0%

6 Butler 54.0% 62.0% 71.0%

7 Pompton Lakes 74.0% 67.0% 71.0%

8 West Milford 74.5% 69.5% 69.3%

9 Wayne 70.3% 73.9% 67.6%

10 Wanaque 68.0% 71.5% 65.0%

11 Riverdale 84.0% 70.0% 64.0%

12 Bloomingdale 67.0% 60.0% 60.0%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 81.0% 66.0% 89.0%

2 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%

3 Lincoln Park 89.0% 69.0% 84.0%

4 Pequannock 88.7% 76.0% 83.3%

5 Bloomingdale 78.0% 57.0% 73.0%

6 Wayne 83.3% 72.0% 72.4%

7 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 67.0% 71.0%

8 West Milford 72.8% 59.8% 69.3%

9 Ringwood 83.0% 64.0%

10 Butler 53.0% 41.0% 61.0%

11 Wanaque 74.0% 74.0% 57.5%

12 Riverdale 71.0% 65.0% 55.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 84.8% 84.1% 82.7%

2 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%

3 Pequannock 79.8% 81.5% 80.2%

4 Ringwood 69.1% 70.4% 73.9%

5 Lincoln Park 72.9% 86.3% 73.8%

6 West Milford 61.5% 73.7% 71.7%

7 Riverdale 67.8% 82.2% 71.4%

8 Wayne 71.3% 73.7% 69.2%

9 Bloomingdale 60.2% 56.4% 67.6%

10 Butler 53.2% 60.8% 64.7%

11 Pompton Lakes 66.6% 74.3% 60.7%

12 Wanaque 66.2% 52.9% 51.9%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%

2 Pequannock 80.2% 83.5% 86.9%

3 Lincoln Park 83.8% 80.5% 82.2%

4 Kinnelon 81.2% 82.7% 79.6%

5 West Milford 67.5% 71.1% 73.1%

6 Pompton Lakes 71.0% 72.9% 70.1%

7 Ringwood 71.0% 72.9% 70.1%

8 Wayne 65.8% 69.2% 69.6%

9 Bloomingdale 60.3% 47.9% 65.3%

10 Riverdale 56.0% 60.7% 61.3%

11 Butler 57.2% 70.1% 60.3%

12 Wanaque 51.4% 53.8% 55.2%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 80.0% 74.6% 89.9%

2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%

3 Pequannock 86.3% 87.8% 89.0%

4 Lincoln Park 77.5% 73.3% 88.6%

5 West Milford 70.2% 74.1% 82.5%

6 Riverdale 79.3% 81.3% 79.4%

7 Pompton Lakes 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%

8 Wayne 70.2% 75.7% 76.2%

9 Ringwood 74.1% 69.7% 73.8%

10 Butler 54.4% 66.3% 66.7%

11 Wanaque 55.1% 51.9% 62.6%

12 Bloomingdale 45.2% 66.2% 62.5%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%

2 Kinnelon 93.3% 94.5% 84.6%

3 Pequannock 96.3% 94.4% 79.8%

4 Lincoln Park 97.6% 89.8% 78.3%

5 Wayne 93.0% 91.1% 71.8%

6 West Milford 90.2% 88.1% 71.5%

7 Pompton Lakes 86.7% 85.5% 70.4%

8 Riverdale 88.9% 87.1% 63.3%

9 Ringwood 94.2% 87.8% 57.5%

10 Bloomingdale 94.0% 84.8% 51.6%

11 Butler 93.2% 85.0% 46.3%

12 Wanaque 86.6% 77.9% 41.4%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

2 Pequannock 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

3 Riverdale 90.0% 68.7% 96.5%

4 Kinnelon 96.9% 92.1% 96.4%

5 Lincoln Park 89.0% 94.9% 96.2%

6 Pompton Lakes 92.3% 91.9% 95.7%

7 Wayne 89.3% 89.9% 95.7%

8 West Milford 91.2% 89.5% 95.1%

9 Wanaque 84.0% 73.9% 94.9%

10 Ringwood 91.9% 82.0% 94.1%

11 Butler 83.8% 76.1% 87.9%

12 Bloomingdale 75.9% 83.8% 78.9%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Riverdale 80.0% 82.7% 100.0%

2 Kinnelon 94.1% 93.2% 98.9%

3 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%

4 Pequannock 91.1% 88.6% 96.6%

5 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%

6 Wayne 91.0% 89.4% 94.4%

7 Pompton Lakes 91.1% 94.7% 94.3%

8 Ringwood 84.0% 84.9% 93.5%

9 Bloomingdale 68.8% 79.9% 92.7%

10 Lincoln Park 93.1% 90.4% 90.4%

11 Butler 82.4% 83.1% 90.0%

12 Wanaque 83.1% 80.9% 81.7%



2014 Kinnelon 87.2% 2014 Oakland 89.8% 2014 Ringwood 98.5%

2013 Kinnelon 88.0% 2013 Pequannock 78.0% 2013 Oakland 88.0%

2012 Oakland 90.3% 2012 Oakland 82.3% 2012 Kinnelon 89.0%

2011 Oakland 86.9% 2011 Oakland 89.2% 2011 Kinnelon 82.7%

2010 Lincoln Park 83.8% 2010 Pequannock 83.5% 2010 Oakland 91.2%

2009 Pequannock 86.3% 2009 Oakland 90.7% 2009 Kinnelon 89.9%

2008 Lincoln Park 97.6% 2008 Kinnelon 94.5% 2008 Oakland 86.4%

2007 Kinnelon 96.9% 2007 Oakland 94.9% 2007 Oakland 98.4%

2006 Oakland 95.5% 2006 Oakland 97.1% 2006 Riverdale 100.0%

Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

KinnelonKinnelonOaklandOaklandLincoln ParkPequannockLincoln ParkKinnelonOakland

201420132012201120102009200820072006

87.2%88.0%

90.3%

86.9%

83.8%

86.3%

97.6%96.9%

95.5%

Core Area Grade 3 First Place LAL Rankings

2006-2014

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

OaklandPequannockOaklandOaklandPequannockOaklandKinnelonOaklandOakland

201420132012201120102009200820072006

89.8%

78.0%

82.3%

89.2%

83.5%

90.7%

94.5%94.9%

97.1%

Core Area

Grade 4 First-Place LAL Rankings

2006-2014

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

95.0%

100.0%

RingwoodOaklandKinnelonKinnelonOaklandKinnelonOaklandOaklandRiverdale

201420132012201120102009200820072006

98.5%

88.0%

89.0%

82.7%

91.2%

89.9%

86.4%

98.4%

100.0%

Core Area

Grade 5 First-Place LAL Rankings

2006-2014

NJASK Core Area LAL First-Place Rankings by Year


-10.0%

-9.0%

-8.0%

-7.0%

-6.0%

-5.0%

-4.0%

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

2.5%

-0.8%

2.4%

0.4%

3.4%

-0.1%

-2.0%

-0.4%

3.2%

-1.8%

0.0%

2.7%

-2.3%

-1.5%

0.4%

-9.4%

-1.6%

0.7%

-5.1%

-7.4%

-2.7%

0.6%

-1.1%

-4.0%

-1.4%

-3.3%

-1.6%

NJASK Core Area Study LAL Score Change by Percent


-90% -80% -70% -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

2014

Gr. 4

2013

Gr. 4

2012

Gr. 4

2011

Gr. 4

2010

Gr. 4

2009

Gr. 4

2008

Gr. 4

2007

Gr. 4

2006

Gr. 4

Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK LAL Score Changes by Percent

Bloomingdale

Butler

Kinnelon

Lincoln Park

Oakland

Pequanock

Pompton Lakes

Ringwood

Riverdale

Wanaque

Wayne

West Milford


2014 Gr. 3 2013 Gr. 3 2012 Gr. 3 2011 Gr. 3 2010 Gr. 3

1 Kinnelon 11.3% 1 Oakland 19.9% 1 Pequannock 25.0% 1 Oakland 17.7% 1 Oakland 12.6%

2 Pequannock 8.9% 2 Pequannock 13.0% 2 Oakland 24.9% 2 Lincoln Park 10.7% 2 Lincoln Park 9.5%

3 Lincoln Park 5.8% 3 Lincoln Park 6.9% 3 Wayne 5.4% 3 Wanaque 10.7% 3 Wanaque 9.5%

4 Oakland 5.6% 4 Wanaque 6.9% 4 West Milford 5.1% 4 West Milford 9.4% 4 Pequannock 3.1%

5 Pompton Lakes 4.7% 5 West Milford -0.6% 5 Bloomingdale 0.1% 5 Pequannock 7.0% 5 West Milford 2.3%

6 Ringwood 3.4% 6 Wayne -3.6% 6 Pompton Lakes 0.1% 6 Wayne 0.4% 6 Kinnelon -3.1%

7 West Milford 2.8% 7 Bloomingdale -6.9% 7 Lincoln Park -0.1% 7 Kinnelon -7.0% 7 Riverdale -3.1%

8 Wayne 2.5% 8 Pompton Lakes -6.9% 8 Wanaque -0.1% 8 Riverdale -7.0% 8 Wayne -4.0%

9 Riverdale -0.2% 9 Kinnelon -13.0% 9 Butler -24.9% 9 Bloomingdale -10.7% 9 Bloomingdale -9.5%

10 Bloomingdale -1.5% 10 Riverdale -13.0% 10 Ringwood -24.9% 10 Pompton Lakes -10.7% 10 Pompton Lakes -9.5%

11 Wanaque -2.5% 11 Butler -19.9% 11 Kinnelon -25.0% 11 Butler -17.7% 11 Butler -12.6%

12 Butler -18.0% 12 Ringwood -19.9% 12 Riverdale -25.0% 12 Ringwood -17.7% 12 Ringwood -12.6%

2009 Gr. 3 2008 Gr. 3 2007 Gr. 3 2006 Gr. 3

1 Lincoln Park 26.8% 1 West Milford 2.0% 1 Lincoln Park 14.8% 1 Lincoln Park 20.0%

2 Wanaque 26.8% 2 Bloomingdale 1.7% 2 Wanaque 14.8% 2 Wanaque 20.0%

3 Oakland 17.6% 3 Pompton Lakes 1.7% 3 Kinnelon 7.9% 3 Kinnelon 13.6%

4 Kinnelon 9.2% 4 Butler 0.9% 4 Riverdale 7.9% 4 Riverdale 13.6%

5 Riverdale 9.2% 5 Ringwood 0.9% 5 Oakland 6.9% 5 Oakland 6.4%

6 West Milford 1.8% 6 Pequannock 0.8% 6 West Milford -0.4% 6 Wayne 2.2%

7 Wayne -1.8% 7 Wayne 0.7% 7 Wayne -1.4% 7 West Milford -2.5%

8 Pequannock -9.2% 8 Kinnelon -0.8% 8 Butler -6.9% 8 Butler -6.4%

9 Butler -17.6% 9 Riverdale -0.8% 9 Ringwood -6.9% 9 Ringwood -6.4%

10 Ringwood -17.6% 10 Oakland -0.9% 10 Pequannock -7.9% 10 Pequannock -13.6%

11 Bloomingdale -26.8% 11 Lincoln Park -1.7% 11 Bloomingdale -14.8% 11 Bloomingdale -20.0%

12 Pompton Lakes -26.8% 12 Wanaque -1.7% 12 Pompton Lakes -14.8% 12 Pompton Lakes -20.0%

NJASK Core Area LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 3


2014 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 5 2010 Gr. 5

1 Ringwood 27.6% 1 Lincoln Park 13.4% 1 Pequannock 12.0% 1 Oakland 6.3% 1 Oakland 12.4%

2 Oakland 16.2% 2 Wanaque 13.4% 2 Oakland 11.1% 2 Lincoln Park 3.4% 2 Lincoln Park 7.4%

3 Pequannock 6.8% 3 Kinnelon 11.0% 3 West Milford 2.7% 3 Wanaque 3.4% 3 Wanaque 7.4%

4 Kinnelon 5.0% 4 Riverdale 11.0% 4 Bloomingdale 0.9% 4 Pequannock 2.9% 4 Pequannock 5.0%

5 Wayne 1.8% 5 West Milford 4.0% 5 Pompton Lakes 0.9% 5 West Milford -0.7% 5 West Milford -0.4%

6 West Milford 1.6% 6 Oakland 2.4% 6 Wayne 0.3% 6 Wayne -1.8% 6 Wayne -3.1%

7 Bloomingdale -0.1% 7 Butler -2.4% 7 Lincoln Park -0.9% 7 Kinnelon -2.9% 7 Kinnelon -5.0%

8 Lincoln Park -1.7% 8 Ringwood -2.4% 8 Wanaque -0.9% 8 Riverdale -2.9% 8 Riverdale -5.0%

9 Pompton Lakes -5.4% 9 Wayne -5.8% 9 Butler -11.1% 9 Bloomingdale -3.4% 9 Bloomingdale -7.4%

10 Riverdale -8.7% 10 Pequannock -11.0% 10 Ringwood -11.1% 10 Pompton Lakes -3.4% 10 Pompton Lakes -7.4%

11 Butler -11.8% 11 Bloomingdale -13.4% 11 Kinnelon -12.0% 11 Butler -6.3% 11 Butler -12.4%

12 Wanaque -12.5% 12 Pompton Lakes -13.4% 12 Riverdale -12.0% 12 Ringwood -6.3% 12 Ringwood -12.4%

2009 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 5 2006 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 17.3% 1 Oakland 22.0% 1 Lincoln Park 16.4% 1 Oakland 3.9%

2 Wanaque 17.3% 2 Lincoln Park 16.7% 2 Wanaque 16.4% 2 Pequannock 2.7%

3 Oakland 13.1% 3 Wanaque 16.7% 3 Kinnelon 9.0% 3 Lincoln Park 1.2%

4 Kinnelon 4.2% 4 Pequannock 5.3% 4 Riverdale 9.0% 4 Wanaque 1.2%

5 Riverdale 4.2% 5 Wayne 3.5% 5 Oakland 7.4% 5 Wayne 0.5%

6 West Milford -2.7% 6 West Milford -3.2% 6 Wayne 0.4% 6 Bloomingdale -1.2%

7 Wayne -3.6% 7 Kinnelon -5.3% 7 West Milford 0.1% 7 Pompton Lakes -1.2%

8 Pequannock -4.2% 8 Riverdale -5.3% 8 Butler -7.4% 8 West Milford -2.4%

9 Butler -13.1% 9 Bloomingdale -16.7% 9 Ringwood -7.4% 9 Kinnelon -2.7%

10 Ringwood -13.1% 10 Pompton Lakes -16.7% 10 Pequannock -9.0% 10 Riverdale -2.7%

11 Bloomingdale -17.3% 11 Butler -22.0% 11 Bloomingdale -16.4% 11 Butler -3.9%

12 Pompton Lakes -17.3% 12 Ringwood -22.0% 12 Pompton Lakes -16.4% 12 Ringwood -3.9%



2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4 2010 Gr. 4

1 Oakland 17.0% 1 Lincoln Park 10.6% 1 Oakland 26.2% 1 Lincoln Park 19.0% 1 Lincoln Park 24.7%

2 Kinnelon 7.8% 2 Wanaque 10.6% 2 Pequannock 16.0% 2 Wanaque 19.0% 2 Wanaque 24.7%

3 Pequannock 4.0% 3 Oakland 8.6% 3 Lincoln Park 10.2% 3 Oakland 14.6% 3 Kinnelon 22.2%

4 Wayne -3.8% 4 Wayne 3.3% 4 Riverdale 10.2% 4 Kinnelon 4.4% 4 Riverdale 22.2%

5 Butler -5.3% 5 Kinnelon 2.0% 5 Wanaque 10.2% 5 Riverdale 4.4% 5 Oakland 2.5%

6 Ringwood -6.3% 6 Riverdale 2.0% 6 West Milford 7.4% 6 West Milford 1.6% 6 West Milford 1.5%

7 Lincoln Park -7.0% 7 West Milford 1.1% 7 Wayne 4.8% 7 Wayne -1.7% 7 Butler -2.5%

8 West Milford -7.4% 8 Pequannock -2.0% 8 Bloomingdale -10.2% 8 Pequannock -4.4% 8 Ringwood -2.5%

9 Pompton Lakes -8.5% 9 Butler -8.6% 9 Pompton Lakes -10.2% 9 Butler -14.6% 9 Wayne -3.4%

10 Riverdale -8.9% 10 Ringwood -8.6% 10 Kinnelon -16.0% 10 Ringwood -14.6% 10 Pequannock -22.2%

11 Bloomingdale -20.1% 11 Bloomingdale -10.6% 11 Butler -26.2% 11 Bloomingdale -19.0% 11 Bloomingdale -24.7%

12 Wanaque -20.8% 12 Pompton Lakes -10.6% 12 Ringwood 12 Pompton Lakes -19.0% 12 Pompton Lakes -24.7%

2009 Gr. 4 2008 Gr. 4 2007 Gr. 4 2006 Gr. 4

1 Lincoln Park 7.9% 1 Lincoln Park 3.7% 1 Oakland 10.1% 1 Lincoln Park 8.5%

2 Wanaque 7.9% 2 Wanaque 3.7% 2 Pequannock 7.7% 2 Wanaque 8.5%

3 Oakland 7.8% 3 Oakland 3.5% 3 Wayne 3.7% 3 Oakland 5.3%

4 Wayne 1.6% 4 Wayne 2.6% 4 Lincoln Park 2.4% 4 Kinnelon 3.2%

5 Kinnelon 0.1% 5 West Milford 0.4% 5 Wanaque 2.4% 5 Riverdale 3.2%

6 Riverdale 0.1% 6 Kinnelon 0.2% 6 Bloomingdale -2.4% 6 Wayne 1.0%

7 West Milford 0.0% 7 Riverdale 0.2% 7 Pompton Lakes -2.4% 7 West Milford 0.8%

8 Pequannock -0.1% 8 Pequannock -0.2% 8 West Milford -3.4% 8 Pequannock -3.2%

9 Butler -7.8% 9 Butler -3.5% 9 Kinnelon -7.7% 9 Butler -5.3%

10 Ringwood -7.8% 10 Ringwood -3.5% 10 Riverdale -7.7% 10 Ringwood -5.3%

11 Bloomingdale -7.9% 11 Bloomingdale -3.7% 11 Butler -10.1% 11 Bloomingdale -8.5%

12 Pompton Lakes -7.9% 12 Pompton Lakes -3.7% 12 Ringwood -10.1% 12 Pompton Lakes -8.5%



2014 Kinnelon 11.3%

2013 Oakland 19.9%

2012 Pequannock 25.0%

2011 Oakland 17.7%

2010 Oakland 12.6%

2009 Lincoln Park 26.8%

2008 West Milford 2.0%



Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking

2014 Oakland 17.0%


2012 Oakland 26.2%





2007 Oakland 10.1%


Grade 4- First-Place Ranking

2014 Ringwood 27.6%


2012 Pequannock 12.0%

2011 Oakland 6.3%

2010 Oakland 12.4%


2008 Oakland 22.0%


2006 Oakland 3.9%


0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

Kinnelon Oakland Pequannock Oakland Oakland Lincoln Park West Milford Lincoln Park Lincoln Park

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

11.3%

19.9%

25.0%

17.7%

12.6%

26.8%

2.0%

14.8%

20.0%

Core Area

Grade 3 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

Oakland Lincoln

Park

Oakland Lincoln

Park

Lincoln

Park

Lincoln

Park

Lincoln

Park

Oakland Lincoln

Park

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

17.0%

10.6%

26.2%

19.0%

24.7%

7.9%

3.7%

10.1%

8.5%

Core Area


2006-2014

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

Ringwood Lincoln Park Pequannock Oakland Oakland Lincoln Park Oakland Lincoln Park Oakland

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

27.6%

13.4%

12.0%

6.3%

12.4%

17.3%

22.0%

16.4%

3.9%

Core Area


2006-2014

NJASK Core Area LAL First-Place Rankings by Percentage


Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK LAL Score Changes Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock

Pompton

Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Avg.

2014

Gr. 3 -1.5% -18.0% 11.3% 5.8% 5.6% 8.9% 4.7% 3.4% -0.2% -2.5% 2.5% 2.8% 1.9%

Gr. 4 -20.1% -5.3% 7.8% -7.0% 17.0% 4.0% -8.5% -6.3% -8.9% -20.8% -3.8% -7.4% -4.9%

Gr. 5 -0.1% -11.8% 5.0% -1.7% 16.2% 6.8% -5.4% 27.6% -8.7% -12.5% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5%

2013

Gr. 3 -6.9% -19.9% 14.1% -1.9% 7.8% 12.1% 0.1% -6.4% 10.1% -5.9% -3.6% -0.6% -0.1%

Gr. 4 -10.6% -8.6% 5.4% -11.6% 5.8% 7.4% -3.6% 2.4% -0.6% 0.9% 3.3% 1.1% -0.7%

Gr. 5 -13.4% -2.4% 10.6% 2.6% 14.6% 5.6% -2.4% -1.4% -9.4% -8.4% -5.8% 4.0% -0.4%

2012

Gr. 3 0.1% -24.9% 3.1% 11.1% 12.4% 10.7% -6.9% 5.1% -6.9% -3.9% 5.4% 5.1% 0.9%

Gr. 4 -10.2% -26.2% -1.2% 1.8% 15.1% 8.8% -0.2% -2.2% 6.8% 4.8% 7.4% 0.4%

Gr. 5 0.9% -11.1% 16.9% 11.9% 14.3% 11.3% -1.1% -8.1% -17.1% -14.6% 0.3% 2.7% 0.5%

2011

Gr. 3 -10.7% -17.7% 13.9% 2.0% 16.0% 8.9% -4.3% -1.9% -3.1% -4.7% 0.4% 9.4% 0.7%

Gr. 4 -19.0% -14.6% 8.7% 10.9% 13.9% 6.1% -1.1% -5.0% 6.8% -22.5% -1.7% 1.6% -1.3%

Gr. 5 -3.4% -6.3% 11.7% 2.8% 10.2% 9.2% -10.3% 2.9% 0.4% -19.1% -1.8% -0.7% -0.4%

2010

Gr. 3 -9.5% -12.6% 11.4% 14.0% 13.3% 10.3% 1.1% 1.1% -13.8% -18.4% -4.0% 2.3% -0.4%

Gr. 4 -24.7% -2.5% 10.1% 7.9% 8.8% 10.9% 0.3% 0.3% -11.9% -18.9% -3.4% 1.5% -1.8%

Gr. 5 -7.4% -12.4% 6.9% 9.5% 18.5% 14.2% -2.6% -2.6% -11.4% -17.5% -3.1% -0.4% -0.7%

2009

Gr. 3 -26.8% -17.6% 8.0% 5.5% 11.5% 14.2% -10.2% 2.1% 7.3% -16.9% -1.8% 1.8% -1.9%

Gr. 4 -7.9% -7.8% 0.5% -0.8% 16.6% 13.8% -4.6% -4.4% 7.2% -22.2% 1.6% 0.0% -0.7%

Gr. 5 -17.3% -13.1% 10.1% 8.8% 10.0% 9.2% -0.7% -6.0% -0.4% -17.2% -3.6% -2.7% -1.9%

2008

Gr. 3 1.7% 0.9% 1.0% 5.3% 2.5% 4.1% -5.6% 1.9% -3.4% -5.7% 0.7% 2.0% 0.5%

Gr. 4 -3.7% -3.5% 6.0% 1.3% 3.9% 5.9% -3.0% -0.7% -1.4% -10.6% 2.6% 0.4% -0.2%

Gr. 5 -16.7% -22.0% 16.3% 10.0% 18.1% 11.5% 2.1% -10.8% -5.0% -26.9% 3.5% -3.2% -1.9%

2007

Gr. 3 -14.8% -6.9% 6.2% -1.7% 5.1% 3.2% 1.5% 1.2% -0.7% -6.8% -1.4% -0.4% -1.3%

Gr. 4 -2.4% -10.1% 5.9% 8.7% 8.8% 7.8% 5.7% -4.2% -17.5% -12.3% 3.7% -3.4% -0.8%

Gr. 5 -16.4% -7.4% 1.1% 0.9% 3.1% 1.7% 0.4% -1.2% 1.2% -0.4% 0.4% 0.1% -1.3%

2006

Gr. 3 -20.0% -6.4% 5.3% 4.3% 6.7% 2.3% 2.3% -4.8% -8.8% -5.7% 2.2% -2.5% -2.1%

Gr. 4 -8.5% -5.3% 4.8% 2.0% 8.7% 0.2% 6.3% -3.5% -5.7% -7.6% 1.0% 0.8% -0.6%

Gr. 5 -1.2% -3.9% 5.0% -3.5% 3.0% 2.7% 0.4% -0.4% 6.1% -12.2% 0.5% -2.4% -0.5%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap ©s 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16

NJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores

2006-2014

Comparative District Grades 3 through 5


2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg

Grade 3 80.5% 80.8% 89.5% 61.5% 62.7% 62.7% 67.3% 68.2% 68.8% 71.6%

Grade 4 79.2% 80.4% 82.1% 66.6% 64.0% 65.3% 59.6% 66.1% 63.8% 70.4%

Grade 5 88.3% 85.0% 60.2% 69.8% 68.6% 66.6% 67.4% 68.5% 67.3% 71.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Suburban Trends Area Comparison District ChartNJASK Language Arts & Literacy Scores 2006-2014

Source: N.J. School Performance Report

Includes: Franklin Lakes, Jefferson Township, Margate City,

Paterson (Select), Tenafly, Totowa and Ventnor City


Comparison School District Score Averages 2006-2014

NJASK Language Arts & Literacy

School

District Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly

Comparative

Distr. Avg.

2014

Gr. 3 71.7% 65.9% 87.4% 22.1% 82.6% 59.2% 92.9% 68.8%

Gr. 4 63.7% 64.6% 81.1% 31.0% 68.9% 49.3% 88.1% 63.8%

Gr. 5 71.2% 58.3% 82.5% 24.8% 85.4% 57.3% 91.9% 67.3%

2013

Gr. 3 67.0% 54.0% 85.3% 48.0% 80.0% 55.0% 88.3% 68.2%

Gr. 4 60.0% 62.0% 70.3% 36.0% 91.0% 55.0% 88.5% 66.1%

Gr. 5 60.0% 71.0% 85.3% 40.7% 76.0% 58.0% 88.5% 68.5%

2012

Gr. 3 78.0% 53.0% 79.3% 30.3% 86.0% 56.0% 88.5% 67.3%

Gr. 4 57.0% 41.0% 83.3% 27.3% 79.0% 49.0% 80.8% 59.6%

Gr. 5 73.0% 61.0% 91.0% 31.0% 76.0% 53.0% 86.5% 67.4%

2011

Gr. 3 60.2% 53.2% 78.7% 29.7% 76.3% 54.2% 86.7% 62.7%

Gr. 4 56.4% 60.8% 83.6% 32.4% 82.1% 53.3% 88.2% 65.3%

Gr. 5 67.6% 64.7% 85.4% 23.3% 74.5% 60.3% 90.3% 66.6%

2010

Gr. 3 60.3% 57.2% 84.9% 26.0% 76.8% 45.8% 87.6% 62.7%

Gr. 4 47.9% 70.1% 80.5% 25.7% 74.5% 57.9% 91.5% 64.0%

Gr. 5 65.3% 60.3% 88.7% 27.7% 77.8% 68.2% 92.1% 68.6%

2009

Gr. 3 45.2% 54.4% 79.4% 22.0% 80.0% 60.5% 89.0% 61.5%

Gr. 4 66.2% 66.3% 80.1% 29.6% 82.6% 56.2% 85.1% 66.6%

Gr. 5 62.5% 66.7% 91.9% 32.1% 85.9% 57.6% 91.7% 69.8%

2008

Gr. 3 94.0% 93.2% 95.8% 58.6% 98.2% 91.7% 95.1% 89.5%

Gr. 4 84.8% 85.0% 94.8% 47.4% 89.6% 77.5% 95.4% 82.1%

Gr. 5 51.6% 46.3% 88.7% 25.5% 72.0% 45.6% 92.0% 60.2%

2007

Gr. 3 75.9% 83.8% 95.2% 44.3% 97.0% 71.4% 97.7% 80.8%

Gr. 4 83.8% 76.1% 95.6% 46.8% 90.8% 73.6% 95.8% 80.4%

Gr. 5 78.9% 87.9% 98.3% 55.2% 95.0% 80.4% 99.1% 85.0%

2006

Gr. 3 68.8% 82.4% 95.4% 51.6% 98.0% 71.7% 95.7% 80.5%

Gr. 4 79.9% 83.1% 94.1% 45.1% 81.5% 73.9% 96.8% 79.2%

Gr. 5 92.7% 90.0% 98.9% 61.8% 94.8% 82.5% 97.1% 88.3%


0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

20

06

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

14

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

83.1% 80.2%

88.6%

83.0% 80.9%

87.4% 89.1%

83.0%

64.9% 64.6% 67.6%

72.6%

62.8%

66.3% 69.3%

64.4% 66.2% 66.7% 66.7%

61.6%

67.5% 67.4% 66.7%

70.9% 68.8%

63.8%

67.3%

NJASK LAL Comparison District Averages by Grade


NJASK Comparative School District LAL Rankings By Year - Grade 3

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 88.3% 88.5% 88.5%

2 Franklin Lakes 85.3% 70.3% 85.3%

3 Margate City 80.0% 91.0% 76.0%

4 Jefferson Twp 61.0% 64.0% 77.0%

5 Ventnor City 55.0% 55.0% 58.0%

6 Totowa 54.0% 62.0% 71.0%

7 Paterson 48.0% 36.0% 40.7%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 88.5% 80.8% 86.5%

2 Margate City 86.0% 79.0% 76.0%

3 Franklin Lakes 79.3% 83.3% 91.0%

4 Jefferson Twp 74.0% 70.5% 74.0%

5 Ventnor City 56.0% 49.0% 53.0%

6 Totowa 53.0% 41.0% 61.0%

7 Paterson 30.3% 27.3% 31.0%

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 92.9% 88.1% 91.9%

2 Franklin Lakes 87.4% 81.1% 82.5%

3 Margate City 82.6% 68.9% 85.4%

4 Jefferson Twp 71.7% 63.7% 71.2%

5 Totowa 65.9% 64.6% 58.3%

6 Ventnor City 59.2% 49.3% 57.3%

7 Paterson 22.1% 31.0% 24.8%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 86.7% 88.2% 90.3%

2 Franklin Lakes 78.7% 83.6% 85.4%

3 Margate City 76.3% 82.1% 74.5%

4 Jefferson Twp 72.2% 62.9% 68.6%

5 Ventnor City 54.2% 53.3% 60.3%

6 Totowa 53.2% 60.8% 64.7%

7 Paterson 29.7% 32.4% 23.3%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 87.6% 91.5% 92.1%

2 Franklin Lakes 84.9% 80.5% 88.7%

3 Margate City 76.8% 74.5% 77.8%

4 Jefferson Twp 61.1% 64.1% 70.1%

5 Totowa 57.2% 70.1% 60.3%

6 Ventnor City 45.8% 57.9% 68.2%

7 Paterson 26.0% 25.7% 27.7%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 89.0% 85.1% 91.7%

2 Margate City 80.0% 82.6% 85.9%

3 Franklin Lakes 79.4% 80.1% 91.9%

4 Jefferson Twp 67.0% 73.4% 82.2%

5 Ventnor City 60.5% 56.2% 57.6%

6 Totowa 54.4% 66.3% 66.7%

7 Paterson 22.0% 29.6% 32.1%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 98.2% 89.6% 72.0%

2 Franklin Lakes 95.8% 94.8% 88.7%

3 Tenafly 95.1% 95.4% 92.0%

4 Totowa 93.2% 85.0% 46.3%

5 Ventnor City 91.7% 77.5% 45.6%

6 Jefferson Twp 91.0% 91.5% 84.0%

7 Paterson 58.6% 47.4% 25.5%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 97.7% 95.8% 99.1%

2 Margate City 97.0% 90.8% 95.0%

3 Franklin Lakes 95.2% 95.6% 98.3%

4 Jefferson Twp 91.8% 87.3% 96.0%

5 Totowa 83.8% 76.1% 87.9%

6 Ventnor City 71.4% 73.6% 80.4%

7 Paterson 44.3% 46.8% 55.2%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 98.0% 81.5% 94.8%

2 Tenafly 95.7% 96.8% 97.1%

3 Franklin Lakes 95.4% 94.1% 98.9%

4 Totowa 82.4% 83.1% 90.0%

5 Ventnor City 71.7% 73.9% 82.5%

6 Jefferson Twp 68.8% 79.9% 92.7%

7 Paterson 51.6% 45.1% 61.8%



2014 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 88.1% 92.9% 91.9%

2 Franklin Lakes 81.1% 87.4% 82.5%

3 Margate City 68.9% 82.6% 85.4%

4 Totowa 64.6% 65.9% 58.3%

5 Jefferson Twp 63.7% 71.7% 71.2%

6 Ventnor City 49.3% 59.2% 57.3%

7 Paterson 31.0% 22.1% 24.8%

2013 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 91.0% 80.0% 76.0%

2 Tenafly 88.5% 88.3% 88.5%

3 Franklin Lakes 70.3% 85.3% 85.3%

4 Jefferson Twp 64.0% 61.0% 77.0%

5 Totowa 62.0% 54.0% 71.0%

6 Ventnor City 55.0% 55.0% 58.0%

7 Paterson 36.0% 48.0% 40.7%

2012 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Franklin Lakes 83.3% 79.3% 91.0%

2 Tenafly 80.8% 88.5% 86.5%

3 Margate City 79.0% 86.0% 76.0%

4 Jefferson Twp 70.5% 74.0% 74.0%

5 Ventnor City 49.0% 56.0% 53.0%

6 Totowa 41.0% 53.0% 61.0%

7 Paterson 27.3% 30.3% 31.0%

2011 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 88.2% 86.7% 90.3%

2 Franklin Lakes 83.6% 78.7% 85.4%

3 Margate City 82.1% 76.3% 74.5%

4 Jefferson Twp 62.9% 72.2% 68.6%

5 Totowa 60.8% 53.2% 64.7%

6 Ventnor City 53.3% 54.2% 60.3%

7 Paterson 32.4% 29.7% 23.3%

2010 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 91.5% 87.6% 92.1%

2 Franklin Lakes 80.5% 84.9% 88.7%

3 Margate City 74.5% 76.8% 77.8%

4 Totowa 70.1% 57.2% 60.3%

5 Jefferson Twp 64.1% 61.1% 70.1%

6 Ventnor City 57.9% 45.8% 68.2%

7 Paterson 25.7% 26.0% 27.7%

2009 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 85.1% 89.0% 91.7%

2 Margate City 82.6% 80.0% 85.9%

3 Franklin Lakes 80.1% 79.4% 91.9%

4 Jefferson Twp 73.4% 67.0% 82.2%

5 Totowa 66.3% 54.4% 66.7%

6 Ventnor City 56.2% 60.5% 57.6%

7 Paterson 29.6% 22.0% 32.1%

2008 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 95.4% 95.1% 92.0%

2 Franklin Lakes 94.8% 95.8% 88.7%

3 Jefferson Twp 91.5% 91.0% 84.0%

4 Margate City 89.6% 98.2% 72.0%

5 Totowa 85.0% 93.2% 46.3%

6 Ventnor City 77.5% 91.7% 45.6%

7 Paterson 47.4% 58.6% 25.5%

2007 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 95.8% 97.7% 99.1%

2 Franklin Lakes 95.6% 95.2% 98.3%

3 Margate City 90.8% 97.0% 95.0%

4 Jefferson Twp 87.3% 91.8% 96.0%

5 Totowa 76.1% 83.8% 87.9%

6 Ventnor City 73.6% 71.4% 80.4%

7 Paterson 46.8% 44.3% 55.2%

2006 Gr. 4 Gr. 3 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 96.8% 95.7% 97.1%

2 Franklin Lakes 94.1% 95.4% 98.9%

3 Totowa 83.1% 82.4% 90.0%

4 Margate City 81.5% 98.0% 94.8%

5 Jefferson Twp 79.9% 68.8% 92.7%

6 Ventnor City 73.9% 71.7% 82.5%

7 Paterson 45.1% 51.6% 61.8%


2011 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 90.3% 86.7% 88.2%

2 Franklin Lakes 85.4% 78.7% 83.6%

3 Margate City 74.5% 76.3% 82.1%

4 Jefferson Twp 68.6% 72.2% 62.9%

5 Totowa 64.7% 53.2% 60.8%

6 Ventnor City 60.3% 54.2% 53.3%

7 Paterson 23.3% 29.7% 32.4%

2010 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 92.1% 87.6% 91.5%

2 Franklin Lakes 88.7% 84.9% 80.5%

3 Margate City 77.8% 76.8% 74.5%

4 Jefferson Twp 70.1% 61.1% 64.1%

5 Ventnor City 68.2% 45.8% 57.9%

6 Totowa 60.3% 57.2% 70.1%

7 Paterson 27.7% 26.0% 25.7%

2009 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Franklin Lakes 91.9% 79.4% 80.1%

2 Tenafly 91.7% 89.0% 85.1%

3 Margate City 85.9% 80.0% 82.6%

4 Jefferson Twp 82.2% 67.0% 73.4%

5 Totowa 66.7% 54.4% 66.3%

6 Ventnor City 57.6% 60.5% 56.2%

7 Paterson 32.1% 22.0% 29.6%


2013 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 88.5% 88.3% 88.5%

2 Franklin Lakes 85.3% 85.3% 70.3%

3 Jefferson Twp 77.0% 61.0% 64.0%

4 Margate City 76.0% 80.0% 91.0%

5 Totowa 71.0% 54.0% 62.0%

6 Ventnor City 58.0% 55.0% 55.0%

7 Paterson 40.7% 48.0% 36.0%

2012 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Franklin Lakes 91.0% 79.3% 83.3%

2 Tenafly 86.5% 88.5% 80.8%

3 Margate City 76.0% 86.0% 79.0%

4 Jefferson Twp 74.0% 74.0% 70.5%

5 Totowa 61.0% 53.0% 41.0%

6 Ventnor City 53.0% 56.0% 49.0%

7 Paterson 31.0% 30.3% 27.3%

2014 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 91.9% 92.9% 88.1%

2 Margate City 85.4% 82.6% 68.9%

3 Franklin Lakes 82.5% 87.4% 81.1%

4 Jefferson Twp 71.2% 71.7% 63.7%

5 Totowa 58.3% 65.9% 64.6%

6 Ventnor City 57.3% 59.2% 49.3%

7 Paterson 24.8% 22.1% 31.0%

2008 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 92.0% 95.1% 95.4%

2 Franklin Lakes 88.7% 95.8% 94.8%

3 Jefferson Twp 84.0% 91.0% 91.5%

4 Margate City 72.0% 98.2% 89.6%

5 Totowa 46.3% 93.2% 85.0%

6 Ventnor City 45.6% 91.7% 77.5%

7 Paterson 25.5% 58.6% 47.4%

2007 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 99.1% 97.7% 95.8%

2 Franklin Lakes 98.3% 95.2% 95.6%

3 Jefferson Twp 96.0% 91.8% 87.3%

4 Margate City 95.0% 97.0% 90.8%

5 Totowa 87.9% 83.8% 76.1%

6 Ventnor City 80.4% 71.4% 73.6%

7 Paterson 55.2% 44.3% 46.8%

2006 Gr. 5 Gr. 3 Gr. 4

1 Franklin Lakes 98.9% 95.4% 94.1%

2 Tenafly 97.1% 95.7% 96.8%

3 Margate City 94.8% 98.0% 81.5%

4 Jefferson Twp 92.7% 68.8% 79.9%

5 Totowa 90.0% 82.4% 83.1%

6 Ventnor City 82.5% 71.7% 73.9%

7 Paterson 61.8% 51.6% 45.1%


2014 Tenafly 92.9%

2013 Tenafly 88.3%

2012 Tenafly 88.5%

2011 Tenafly 86.7%

2010 Tenafly 87.6%

2009 Tenafly 89.0%

2008 Margate City 98.2%

2007 Tenafly 97.7%



2014 Tenafly 88.1%


2012 Franklin Lakes 83.3%

2011 Tenafly 88.2%

2010 Tenafly 91.5%

2009 Tenafly 85.1%

2008 Tenafly 95.4%

2007 Tenafly 95.8%

2006 Tenafly 96.8%

Grade 4 - First Place Ranking

2014 Tenafly 91.9%

2013 Tenafly 88.5%


2011 Tenafly 90.3%

2010 Tenafly 92.1%


2008 Tenafly 92.0%

2007 Tenafly 99.1%


Grade 5 - First Place Ranking

80.0%

81.0%

82.0%

83.0%

84.0%

85.0%

86.0%

87.0%

88.0%

89.0%

90.0%

91.0%

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyTenaflyMargateCity

TenaflyMargateCity

201420132012201120102009200820072006

92.9%

88.3%88.5%

86.7%

87.6%

89.0%

98.2%97.7%98.0%

Comparison DistrictGrade 3 First Place LAL Rankings

2006-2014

75.0%76.0%77.0%78.0%79.0%80.0%81.0%82.0%83.0%84.0%85.0%86.0%87.0%88.0%89.0%90.0%91.0%92.0%93.0%94.0%95.0%96.0%97.0%98.0%99.0%

100.0%


TenaflyMargateCity

201420132012201120102009200820072006

88.1%

91.0%

83.3%

88.2%

91.5%

85.1%

95.4%95.8%96.8%


2006-2014

83.0%

84.0%

85.0%

86.0%

87.0%

88.0%

89.0%

90.0%

91.0%

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%


TenaflyMargateCity

201420132012201120102009200820072006

91.9%

88.5%

91.0%90.3%

92.1%91.9%92.0%

99.1%98.9%


2006-2014

NJASK Comparative District LAL First-Place Rankings by Year


-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

20

14

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

06

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

2.4%

-1.7%

1.3%

0.8%

-2.2%

2.2%

0.8%

-1.7%

6.2%

1.1%

0.7%

1.9%

4.0%

1.5%

3.8%

-2.2%

1.4%

1.0%

1.5%

1.0%

2.8%

-1.1%

3.5%

-2.3%

-0.8%

1.2%

0.3%

NJASK Comparison District LAL Score Change by Percent


-60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0%

2014

Gr. 4

2013

Gr. 4

2012

Gr. 4

2011

Gr. 4

2010

Gr. 4

2009

Gr. 4

2008

Gr. 4

2007

Gr. 4

2006

Gr. 4

Comparison of Comparative District NJASK LAL Score Changes by Percent

Jefferson Twp

Totowa

Franklin Lakes

Paterson

Margate City

Ventnor City

Tenafly


2014 Gr. 3 2013 Gr. 3 2012 Gr. 3 2011 Gr. 3 2010 Gr. 3Franklin

Lakes 11.3% 1Franklin

Lakes 14.1% 1 Margate City 12.4% 1 Margate City 16.0% 1 Paterson 14.0%

Ventnor City 8.9% 2 Ventnor City 12.1% 2 Paterson 11.1% 2Franklin

Lakes 13.9% 2 Margate City 13.3%

Paterson 5.8% 3 Margate City 7.8% 3 Ventnor City 10.7% 3 Ventnor City 8.9% 3Franklin

Lakes 11.4%

Margate City 5.6% 4 Tenafly 0.1% 4Franklin

Lakes 3.1% 4 Paterson 2.0% 4 Ventnor City 10.3%

Tenafly 4.7% 5 Paterson -1.9% 5Jefferson

Twp 0.1% 5 Tenafly -4.3% 5 Tenafly 1.1%Jefferson

Twp -1.5% 6Jefferson

Twp -6.9% 6 Tenafly -6.9% 6Jefferson


Twp -9.5%

Totowa -18.0% 7 Totowa -19.9% 7 Totowa -24.9% 7 Totowa -17.7% 7 Totowa -12.6%

2009 Gr. 3 2008 Gr. 3 2007 Gr. 3 2006 Gr. 3

Ventnor City 14.2% 1 Paterson 5.3% 1Franklin

Lakes 6.2% 1 Margate City 6.7%

Margate City 11.5% 2 Ventnor City 4.1% 2 Margate City 5.1% 2Franklin

Lakes 5.3%Franklin

Lakes 8.0% 3 Margate City 2.5% 3 Ventnor City 3.2% 3 Paterson 4.3%

Paterson 5.5% 4Jefferson

Twp 1.7% 4 Tenafly 1.5% 4 Tenafly 2.3%

Tenafly -10.2% 5Franklin

Lakes 1.0% 5 Paterson -1.7% 5 Ventnor City 2.3%

Totowa -17.6% 6 Totowa 0.9% 6 Totowa -6.9% 6 Totowa -6.4%Jefferson

Twp -26.8% 7 Tenafly -5.6% 7Jefferson


Twp -20.0%

NJASK Comparison District LAL Percentage by Rank - Grade 3


2014 Gr. 4 2013 Gr. 4 2012 Gr. 4 2011 Gr. 4

1 Margate City 17.0% 1 Ventnor City 7.4% 1 Margate City 15.1% 1 Margate City 13.9%

2Franklin

Lakes 7.8% 2 Margate City 5.8% 2 Ventnor City 8.8% 2 Paterson 10.9%

3 Ventnor City 4.0% 3Franklin

Lakes 5.4% 3 Paterson 1.8% 3Franklin

Lakes 8.7%

4 Totowa -5.3% 4 Tenafly -3.6% 4 Tenafly -0.2% 4 Ventnor City 6.1%

5 Paterson -7.0% 5 Totowa -8.6% 5Franklin

Lakes -1.2% 5 Tenafly -1.1%

6 Tenafly -8.5% 6Jefferson


Twp -10.2% 6 Totowa -14.6%

7Jefferson

Twp -20.1% 7 Paterson -11.6% 7 Totowa -26.2% 7Jefferson

Twp -19.0%

2010 Gr. 4 2009 Gr. 4 2008 Gr. 4 2007 Gr. 4 2006 Gr. 4

1 Ventnor City 10.9% 1 Margate City 16.6% 1Franklin

Lakes 6.0% 1 Margate City 8.8% 1 Margate City 8.7%

2Franklin

Lakes 10.1% 2 Ventnor City 13.8% 2 Ventnor City 5.9% 2 Paterson 8.7% 2 Tenafly 6.3%

3 Margate City 8.8% 3Franklin

Lakes 0.5% 3 Margate City 3.9% 3 Ventnor City 7.8% 3Franklin

Lakes 4.8%

4 Paterson 7.9% 4 Paterson -0.8% 4 Paterson 1.3% 4Franklin

Lakes 5.9% 4 Paterson 2.0%

5 Tenafly 0.3% 5 Tenafly -4.6% 5 Tenafly -3.0% 5 Tenafly 5.7% 5 Ventnor City 0.2%

6 Totowa -2.5% 6 Totowa -7.8% 6 Totowa -3.5% 6Jefferson

Twp -2.4% 6 Totowa -5.3%

7Jefferson



Twp -3.7% 7 Totowa -10.1% 7Jefferson

Twp -8.5%



2014 Gr. 5 2013 Gr. 5 2012 Gr. 5 2011 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 16.2% 1 Margate City 14.6% 1Franklin

Lakes 16.9% 1Franklin

Lakes 11.7%

2 Ventnor City 6.8% 2Franklin

Lakes 10.6% 2 Margate City 14.3% 2 Margate City 10.2%

3Franklin

Lakes 5.0% 3 Ventnor City 5.6% 3 Paterson 11.9% 3 Ventnor City 9.2%

4Jefferson

Twp -0.1% 4 Paterson 2.6% 4 Ventnor City 11.3% 4 Paterson 2.8%

5 Paterson -1.7% 5 Totowa -2.4% 5Jefferson

Twp 0.9% 5Jefferson

Twp -3.4%

6 Tenafly -5.4% 6 Tenafly -2.4% 6 Tenafly -1.1% 6 Totowa -6.3%

7 Totowa -11.8% 7Jefferson

Twp -13.4% 7 Totowa -11.1% 7 Tenafly -10.3%

2010 Gr. 5 2009 Gr. 5 2008 Gr. 5 2007 Gr. 5 2006 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 18.5% 1Franklin

Lakes 10.1% 1 Margate City 18.1% 1 Margate City 3.1% 1Franklin

Lakes 5.0%

2 Ventnor City 14.2% 2 Margate City 10.0% 2Franklin

Lakes 16.3% 2 Ventnor City 1.7% 2 Margate City 3.0%

3 Paterson 9.5% 3 Ventnor City 9.2% 3 Ventnor City 11.5% 3Franklin

Lakes 1.1% 3 Ventnor City 2.7%

4Franklin

Lakes 6.9% 4 Paterson 8.8% 4 Paterson 10.0% 4 Paterson 0.9% 4 Tenafly 0.4%

5 Tenafly -2.6% 5 Tenafly -0.7% 5 Tenafly 2.1% 5 Tenafly 0.4% 5Jefferson

Twp -1.2%

6Jefferson


Twp -16.7% 6 Totowa -7.4% 6 Paterson -3.5%

7 Totowa -12.4% 7Jefferson


Twp -16.4% 7 Totowa -3.9%



0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

12.0%

13.0%

14.0%

15.0%

16.0%

17.0%

FranklinLakes

FranklinLakes

MargateCity

MargateCity

PatersonVentnorCity

PatersonFranklinLakes

MargateCity

201420132012201120102009200820072006

Comparison DistrictGrade 3 First Place LAL Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

12.0%

13.0%

14.0%

15.0%

16.0%

17.0%

MargateCity

VentnorCity

MargateCity

MargateCity

VentnorCity

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

MargateCity

MargateCity

201420132012201120102009200820072006


2006-2014

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%

10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%18.0%19.0%

MargateCity

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

FranklinLakes

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

MargateCity

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

201420132012201120102009200820072006


2006-2014

2014Franklin

Lakes 11.3%

2013Franklin

Lakes 14.1%



2010 Paterson 14.0%

2009 Ventnor City 14.2%

2008 Paterson 5.3%

2007Franklin

Lakes 6.2%









2008Franklin

Lakes 6.0%






2012Franklin

Lakes 16.9%

2011Franklin

Lakes 11.7%


2009Franklin

Lakes 10.1%



2006Franklin

Lakes 5.0%


NJASK Comparsion District First Place Rankings by Percentage


Jefferson

Twp Totowa

Franklin

Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly Avg.

2014

Gr. 3 -1.5% -18.0% 11.3% 5.8% 5.6% 8.9% 4.7% 2.4%

Gr. 4 -20.1% -5.3% 7.8% -7.0% 17.0% 4.0% -8.5% -1.7%

Gr. 5 -0.1% -11.8% 5.0% -1.7% 16.2% 6.8% -5.4% 1.3%

2013

Gr. 3 -6.9% -19.9% 14.1% -1.9% 7.8% 12.1% 0.1% 0.8%

Gr. 4 -10.6% -8.6% 5.4% -11.6% 5.8% 7.4% -3.6% -2.2%

Gr. 5 -13.4% -2.4% 10.6% 2.6% 14.6% 5.6% -2.4% 2.2%

2012

Gr. 3 0.1% -24.9% 3.1% 11.1% 12.4% 10.7% -6.9% 0.8%

Gr. 4 -10.2% -26.2% -1.2% 1.8% 15.1% 8.8% -0.2% -1.7%

Gr. 5 0.9% -11.1% 16.9% 11.9% 14.3% 11.3% -1.1% 6.2%

2011

Gr. 3 -10.7% -17.7% 13.9% 2.0% 16.0% 8.9% -4.3% 1.1%

Gr. 4 -19.0% -14.6% 8.7% 10.9% 13.9% 6.1% -1.1% 0.7%

Gr. 5 -3.4% -6.3% 11.7% 2.8% 10.2% 9.2% -10.3% 1.9%

2010

Gr. 3 -9.5% -12.6% 11.4% 14.0% 13.3% 10.3% 1.1% 4.0%Gr. 4 -24.7% -2.5% 10.1% 7.9% 8.8% 10.9% 0.3% 1.5%

Gr. 5 -7.4% -12.4% 6.9% 9.5% 18.5% 14.2% -2.6% 3.8%

2009

Gr. 3 -26.8% -17.6% 8.0% 5.5% 11.5% 14.2% -10.2% -2.2%

Gr. 4 -7.9% -7.8% 0.5% -0.8% 16.6% 13.8% -4.6% 1.4%

Gr. 5 -17.3% -13.1% 10.1% 8.8% 10.0% 9.2% -0.7% 1.0%

2008

Gr. 3 1.7% 0.9% 1.0% 5.3% 2.5% 4.1% -5.6% 1.5%

Gr. 4 -3.7% -3.5% 6.0% 1.3% 3.9% 5.9% -3.0% 1.0%

Gr. 5 -16.7% -22.0% 16.3% 10.0% 18.1% 11.5% 2.1% 2.8%

2007

Gr. 3 -14.8% -6.9% 6.2% -1.7% 5.1% 3.2% 1.5% -1.1%Gr. 4 -2.4% -10.1% 5.9% 8.7% 8.8% 7.8% 5.7% 3.5%

Gr. 5 -16.4% -7.4% 1.1% 0.9% 3.1% 1.7% 0.4% -2.3%

2006

Gr. 3 -20.0% -6.4% 5.3% 4.3% 6.7% 2.3% 2.3% -0.8%Gr. 4 -8.5% -5.3% 4.8% 2.0% 8.7% 0.2% 6.3% 1.2%

Gr. 5 -1.2% -3.9% 5.0% -3.5% 3.0% 2.7% 0.4% 0.3%

Comparison of Comparison District NJASK LAL Score Changes

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty

31

Narrowing the Achievement Gap

Fourth Grade Data


Total Core

Area

Average

Total CD

Area

Average

Comparison

to CD

Average

2013 70.6% 66.7% 3.9%

2012 67.2% 61.6% 5.7%

2011 75.4% 66.2% 9.2%

2010 72.6% 66.3% 6.3%

2009 74.1% 67.6% 6.5%

2008 88.5% 83.0% 5.5%

2007 86.2% 80.9% 5.3%

2006 88.4% 80.2% 8.2%

Total Core

Area

Average

Literacy

Scores

Total CD

Area

Average

Literacy

Score NJ Average U.S. Average

2013 70.6% 66.7% 75.0% 68.0%

2012 67.2% 61.6%

2011 75.4% 66.2% 78.1% 66.2%

2010 72.6% 66.3% 76.1% 65.7%

2009 74.1% 67.6%

2008 88.5% 83.0% 82.7% 66.8%

2007 86.2% 80.9% 80.6% 61.9%

2006 88.4% 80.2% 82.5% 70.6%

NJASK 4th Grade Literacy and Language Arts Comparsion 2006-2013


NJASK 4th Grade Literacy and Language Arts Comparsion 2006-2013

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

20132012201120102009200820072006

70.6%

67.2%

75.4%

72.6%74.1%

88.5%86.2%

88.4%

66.7%

61.6%

66.2%66.3%67.6%

83.0%80.9%80.2%

NJASK 4th Grade NJASK Literacy Score Comparison 2006-2013

Total Core AreaAverage LiteracyScores

Total CD AreaAverage LiteracyScore

NJ Average

U.S. Average

Total Core

Area

Average

Total CD

Area

Average

Comparison

to CD

Average

2013 70.6% 66.7% 3.9%

2012 67.2% 61.6% 5.7%

2011 75.4% 66.2% 9.2%

2010 72.6% 66.3% 6.3%

2009 74.1% 67.6% 6.5%

2008 88.5% 83.0% 5.5%

2007 86.2% 80.9% 5.3%

2006 88.4% 80.2% 8.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Total Core Area Literacy

Total CoreAreaAverageLiteracyScore

Core AreaAverageEnglish



New Jersey NJASK LAL Averages - Grade 4

Below Basic Basic Proficient

Total

Proficient

Advanced

Proficient

2013 25.0% 33.0% 30.0% 63.0% 12.0%

2012

2011 21.9% 34.2% 32.5% 66.7% 11.4%

2010 23.9% 35.8% 30.1% 65.9% 10.2%

2009

2008 17.3% 78.1% 4.6%

2007 19.4% 73.9% 6.7%2006 17.5% 79.6% 2.9%

New Jersey

Below Basic Basic Proficient

Total

Proficient

Advanced

Proficient

2013 32.0% 33.0% 27.0% 60.0% 8.0%

2012

2011 33.8% 33.8% 24.9% 58.7% 7.5%

2010 34.4% 34.1% 24.4% 58.5% 7.2%

2009

2008 33.2% 65.6% 1.2%

2007 38.1% 60.1% 1.8%2006 30.4% 67.7% 2.9%

U.S.

Below Basic

Total

Proficient

Advanced

Proficient

Combined

TP & TAP

2013 25.0% 63.0% 12.0% 75.0%

2012

2011 21.9% 66.7% 11.4% 78.1%

2010 23.9% 65.9% 10.2% 76.1%

2008 17.3% 78.1% 4.6% 82.7%

2009

2007 19.4% 73.9% 6.7% 80.6%2006 17.5% 79.6% 2.9% 82.5%

New JerseyBelow

Basic

Total

Proficient

Advanced

Proficient

Combined TP

& TAP

2013 32.0% 60.0% 8.0% 68.0%

2012

2011 33.8% 58.7% 7.5% 66.2%

2010 34.4% 58.5% 7.2% 65.7%

2008 33.2% 65.6% 1.2% 66.8%

2009

2007 38.1% 60.1% 1.8% 61.9%2006 30.4% 67.7% 2.9% 70.6%

U.S.


0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

201120102009200820072006

NJASK Grade 4 LAL Score Comparison

Total CDArea Gr 4ScoreAverage

Total CoreStudy AreaGr 4 ScoreAverage

NJASK 4th Grade Enrollment Comparsion 2006-2011

Core Grade 4

Enrollment Avg.

Comparative

Distr. Grade

4 Enrollment

Avg.

Combined

Core & CD

Avg Gr 4

Enrollment

2011 177.3 145.9 165.7

2010 178.2 157.4 170.5

2009 176.4 156.9 169.2

2008 175.9 168.9 173.3

2007 184.1 159.4 175.02006 182.5 162.1 175.0

Average 179.1 158.4 171.5

Core Study

Area Grade 4

Enrollment

Avg.

Core Study

Area Gr 4

Class Size

Avg

2011 177.3 22.8

2010 178.2 23.1

2009 176.4 20.0

2008 175.9 20.2

2007 184.1 20.7

2006 182.5 21.3

Average 179.1 21.3

Comparative

Distr. Grade

4 Enrollment

Avg.

Comparative

Distr. Gr 4

Class Size

Avg

2011 145.9 20.3

2010 157.4 18.3

2009 156.9 19.6

2008 168.9 19.6

2007 159.4 19.3

2006 162.1 21.2

Average 158.4 19.7

Core Grade 4

Enrollment

Avg.

Comparative

Distr. Grade

4 Enrollment

Avg.

Gr 4 Class

Enrollment

Average

2011 177.3 145.9 161.6

2010 178.2 157.4 21.6

2009 176.4 156.9 20.7

2008 175.9 168.9 21.0

2007 184.1 159.4 21.42006 182.5 162.1 21.6

Average 179.1 158.4 44.6

Core Area Gr 4

Average Score

Core

AreaGrade 4

Enrollment

Avg.

2011 75.4% 177.3

2010 72.6% 178.2

2009 74.1% 176.4

2008 88.5% 175.9

2007 86.2% 184.12006 88.4% 182.5

Average 80.9% 179.1

Total CD

Area Gr. 4

Average

Score

Comparative

Distr. Grade

4 Enrollment

Avg.

2011 66.2% 145.9

2010 66.3% 157.4

2009 67.6% 156.9

2008 83.0% 168.9

2007 80.9% 159.42006 80.2% 162.1

Average 74.0% 158.4


NJASK 4th Grade Class Size Comparsion 2006-2011

Total Core

Area Gr 4

Score

Average

Total CD

Area Gr 4

Score

Average

Comparison

to Class Size

Average

Total Core

Area Gr 4

Average

Score

Core Gr 4

Class Size

Avg

Total CD

Area

Average

Score

Comparative

Distr. Gr 4

Class Size

Avg

Core Gr 4

Class Size

Avg

Comparative

Distr. Gr 4

Class Size

Avg

Gr 4 Class

Size Average

2011 75.4% 66.2% 21.9 2011 75.4% 22.8 2011 66.2% 20.3 2011 22.8 20.3 21.9

2010 72.6% 66.3% 21.6 2010 72.6% 23.1 2010 66.3% 18.3 2010 23.1 18.3 21.6

2009 74.1% 67.6% 20.7 2009 74.1% 20.0 2009 67.6% 19.6 2009 20.0 19.6 20.7

2008 88.5% 83.0% 21.0 2008 88.5% 20.2 2008 83.0% 19.6 2008 20.2 19.6 21.0

2007 86.2% 80.9% 21.4 2007 86.2% 20.7 2007 80.9% 19.3 2007 20.7 19.3 21.4

2006 88.4% 80.2% 21.6 2006 88.4% 21.3 2006 80.2% 21.2 2006 21.3 21.2 21.6

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

201120102009200820072006

NJASK Grade 4 Class SizeComparison

CoreStudyAreaGr 4Class SizeAvg

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

201120102009200820072006

NJASK Grade 4 Class SizeComparison

Core StudyAreaGr 4Class SizeAvg

ComparativeDistr. Gr 4Class SizeAvg



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

20132012201120102009200820072006

70.6%

67.2%

75.4%

72.6%74.1%

88.5%86.2%

88.4%

66.7%

61.6%

66.2%66.3%67.6%

83.0%80.9%80.2%

75.0%78.1%

76.1%

82.7%80.6%

82.5%

68.0%66.2%65.7%66.8%

61.9%

70.6%

NJASK 4th Grade NJASK Literacy Score Comparison 2006-2013

Total Core AreaAverage LiteracyScores

Total CD AreaAverage LiteracyScore

NJ Average

U.S. Average


SAT

Verbal Scores

TOWNS Core

Towns Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Riverdale

Pompton

Lks Oakland Wanaque Ringwood West Milford Lincoln Park Pequannock Wayne Hills Wayne Valley Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin Lakes Paterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly

SAT NJ

Ranking 37 60 156 201 77 50 91 179 208 43 274 5

SAT Scores

V 2013 530 553 503 468 527 512 510 487 465 529 330 592

SAT Scores

M 2013 567 560 509 491 573 555 555 505 501 559 340 652

SAT Scores

V 2012 538 534 490 471 512 523 516 484 473 534 368 575

SAT Scores

M 2012 564 546 503 494 536 566 550 500 496 546 377 632

SAT Scores

V 2011 543 530 488 463 515 526 510 479 461 540 344 578

SAT Scores

M 2011 575 539 500 499 539 569 536 494 489 561 395 636

SAT Scores

V 2010 532 543 501 470 517 525 517 482 483 549 363 573

SAT Scores

M 2010 557 556 512 481 546 568 554 502 503 566 408 640

SAT Scores

V 2009 535 522 478 486 498 525 517 482 474 556 364 576

SAT Scores

M 2009 559 538 496 502 517 565 559 494 496 570 398 630

SAT Scores

V 2008 541 544 496 471 486 521 511 490 469 544 362 583

SAT Scores

M 2008 579 541 504 490 513 569 553 515 496 541 398 623

SAT Scores

V 2007 519 535 481 479 485 513 517 488 469 535 369 572

SAT Scores

M 2007 532 542 501 516 500 549 556 503 494 542 404 619

SAT Scores

V 2006 528 532 497 477 521 519 520 502 481 532 363 569

SAT Scores

M 2006 543 546 514 497 539 566 555 523 502 546 410 620

SAT

Participation 94.0% 91.0% 73.9% 74.6% 94.8% 88.7% (H); 84.4% (V) 83.5% 80.3% 72.4% 92.2% 88.1% 94.0%

266

429

461

432

450

444

423

497 539 492

432

454

488 513 509

78.7% 77.1% 83.5%

487 503 493

441

468

488 481 503

499 548 516

421

441

494 493 520

499 541 513

430

447

507 490 514

487 535 520

434

449

498 501 510

501 528 515

503 492 506

499 518 521

498 491 510

143 121 97

505 527 520

495 493 510


Study Area N.J. SAT Scores


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

20132012201120102009200820072006

SAT Verbal Scores by School District 2006-2013

Butler H.S.

KinnelonH.S.

PomptonLksH.S.

IndianHillsRHS

SAT Verbal Scores 2006-2013

Butler H.S. Kinnelon H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS West Milford H.S. Boonton H.S.

Pequannock TWP

HS Wayne Hills H.S.

Wayne Valley

H.S. Jefferson H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Ramapo

H.S. Paterson Tenafly H.S.

2013 495 530 553 503 468 527 512 510 487 465 529 330 592

2012 503 538 534 490 471 512 523 516 484 473 534 368 575

2011 498 543 530 488 463 515 526 510 479 461 540 344 578

2010 498 532 543 501 470 517 525 517 482 483 549 363 573

2009 507 535 522 478 486 498 525 517 482 474 556 364 576

2008 494 541 544 496 471 486 521 511 490 469 544 362 583

2007 488 519 535 481 479 485 513 517 488 469 535 369 572

2006 488 528 532 497 477 521 519 520 502 481 532 363 569

Average 496 533 537 492 473 508 521 515 487 472 540 358 577

Lakeland RHS Atlantic City H.S.

513 509 423

481 503 432

493 520 441

490 514 421

501

430510494

492 506 432

493 510 429

510 430

491 510 434

Pompton Lks H.S.


SAT Verbal Rankings by School 2006-2013

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Butler H.S. 495 503 498 498 507 494 488 488

Kinnelon

H.S. 530 538 543 532 535 541 519 528

Indian Hills

RHS 553 534 530 543 522 544 535 532

West

Milford

H.S. 503 490 488 501 478 496 481 497

Boonton

H.S. 468 471 463 470 486 471 479 477

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS 527 512 515 517 498 486 485 521

Wayne

Hills H.S. 512 523 526 525 525 521 513 519

Wayne

Valley H.S. 510 516 510 517 517 511 517 520

Jefferson H.S. 487 484 479 482 482 490 488 502

Passaic

Valley RHS 465 473 461 483 474 469 469 481

Ramapo

H.S. 529 534 540 549 556 544 535 532

Paterson 330 368 344 363 364 362 369 363

Tenafly H.S. 592 575 578 573 576 583 572 569

423

503 509

Atlantic

City H.S. 429 432 434 430 421 441 432

493 481 513

Lakeland

RHS 520

Pompton

Lks H.S. 493 492 491 501 490

510 506 510 510 514


SAT Verbal Rankings 2006-2013

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Atlantic City H.S. 429 432 434 430 421 441 432 423

Boonton H.S. 468 471 463 470 486 471 479 477

Butler H.S. 495 503 498 498 507 494 488 488

Indian Hills RHS 553 534 530 543 522 544 535 532

Jefferson H.S. 487 484 479 482 482 490 488 502

Kinnelon H.S. 530 538 543 532 535 541 519 528

Lakeland RHS 510 506 510 510 514 520 503 509

Passaic Valley RHS 465 473 461 483 474 469 469 481

Paterson 330 368 344 363 364 362 369 363

Pequannock Twp

RHS 527 512 515 517 498 486 485 521

Pompton Lks H.S. 493 492 491 501 490 493 481 513

Ramapo H.S. 529 534 540 549 556 544 535 532

Tenafly H.S. 592 575 578 573 576 583 572 569

Wayne Hills H.S. 512 523 526 525 525 521 513 519

Wayne Valley H.S. 510 516 510 517 517 511 517 520

West Milford H.S. 503 490 488 501 478 496 481 497


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Pompton Lks H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Jefferson H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

573

549

543

532

525

517

517

510

501

501

498

483

482

470

430

363

SAT Verbal Scores - 2010

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Wayne Hills H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Lakeland RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Butler H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

578

543

540

530

526

515

510

510

498

491

488

479

463

461

434

344


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Wayne Valley H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Lakeland RHS

Butler H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

575

538

534

534

523

516

512

506

503

492

490

484

473

471

432

368


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Kinnelon H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Wayne Hills H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

592

553

530

529

527

512

510

510

503

495

493

487

468

465

429

330


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Boonton H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

583

544

544

541

521

520

511

496

494

493

490

486

471

469

441

362


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Butler H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Pompton Lks H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

576

556

535

525

522

517

514

507

498

490

486

482

478

474

421

364


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Pompton Lks H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Jefferson H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

573

549

543

532

525

517

517

510

501

501

498

483

482

470

430

363


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Wayne Hills H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Lakeland RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Butler H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

578

543

540

530

526

515

510

510

498

491

488

479

463

461

434

344


0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tenafly H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Pequannock Twp RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Jefferson H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

569

532

532

528

521

520

519

513

509

502

497

488

481

477

423

363


SAT Verbal Rankings 2006-2013


SAT Verbal Scores 2006-2013

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

1 Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.Tenafly H.S.

2

Indian Hills

RHS

Indian Hills

RHS

Indian Hills

RHS

Ramapo

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

3

Ramapo

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Ramapo

H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Kinnelon

H.S.

4

Kinnelon

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Ramapo

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

5

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

6

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Wayne Hills

H.S.

7

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Lakeland

RHS

8

Pompton

Lks H.S. Butler H.S.

West

Milford

H.S. Butler H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

9

Lakeland

RHS

Jefferson

H.S. Butler H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S. Butler H.S. Butler H.S.

West

Milford H.S.

10

Jefferson

H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S. Butler H.S.

11

West

Milford

H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Boonton

H.S. Butler H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

12 Butler H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Jefferson

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Jefferson

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

13

Passaic

Valley RHS

Boonton

H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Boonton

H.S.

14

Boonton

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Passaic

Valley RHS

Passaic

Valley RHS

Boonton

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Boonton

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

15

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

16 Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson


Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate

School

District

SAT

Participation

Pequannock 94.8%

Kinnelon 94.0%

Tenafly 94.0%

Franklin Lakes 92.2%

Oakland 91.0%

Wayne Hills 88.7%

Paterson 88.1%

Wayne Valley 84.4%

Ringwood 83.5%

Wanaque 83.5%

Jefferson Twp 80.3%

Bloomingdale 78.7%

Butler 78.7%

Pompton Lks 77.1%

Riverdale 77.1%

Lincoln Park 74.6%

West Milford 73.9%

Totowa 72.4%

Margate City 68.4%

Atlantic City 54.6%

Ventnor City 68.4%

School District

SAT

Participation

Core Towns

Bloomingdale

Butler

Kinnelon 94.0%

Riverdale

Pompton Lks

Oakland 91.0%

Wanaque

Ringwood

West Milford 73.9%

Lincoln Park 74.6%

Pequannock 94.8%

Wayne Hills 88.7%

Wayne Valley 84.4%

Core Town

Neighbors

Jefferson Twp 80.3%

Montville 89.6%

Totowa 72.4%

Big Cities

Paterson 88.1%

Atlantic City 54.6%

AC HS Sending Districts

Margate City 54.6%

Ventnor City

Highest Scoring School in Study

Tenafly 94.0%

78.7%

77.1%

83.5%


Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate

School District

SAT

Participation

School

District

SAT

Participation

School

District

SAT

Participation

Core Towns Atlantic City 54.6% Pequannock 94.8%

Bloomingdale Bloomingdale 78.7% Kinnelon 94.0%

Butler Butler 78.7% Tenafly 94.0%

Kinnelon 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Franklin Lakes 92.2%

Riverdale Jefferson Twp 80.3% Oakland 91.0%

Pompton Lks Kinnelon 94.0% Wayne Hills 88.7%

Oakland 91.0% Lincoln Park 74.6% Paterson 88.1%

Wanaque Margate City 68.4% Wayne Valley 84.4%

Ringwood Oakland 91.0% Ringwood 83.5%

West Milford 73.9% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque 83.5%

Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Jefferson Twp 80.3%

Pequannock 94.8% Pompton Lks 77.1% Bloomingdale 78.7%

Wayne Hills 88.7% Ringwood 83.5% Butler 78.7%

Wayne Valley 84.4% Riverdale 77.1% Pompton Lks 77.1%

Core Town

Neighbors Tenafly 94.0% Riverdale 77.1%

Jefferson Twp 80.3% Totowa 72.4% Lincoln Park 74.6%

Montville 89.6% Ventnor City West Milford 73.9%

Totowa 72.4% Wanaque 83.5% Totowa 72.4%

Big Cities Wayne Hills 88.7% Margate City 68.4%

Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Atlantic City 54.6%

Atlantic City 54.6% West Milford 73.9% Ventnor City 68.4%

AC HS Sending Districts

Margate City 54.6%

Ventnor City

Highest Scoring School in Study

Tenafly 94.0%

78.7%

77.1%

83.5%



Narrowing the Achievement Gap

General Literacy Data

NJASK English-Speaking Students

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Total Comparative District Literacy

Total CDAreaAverageLiteracyScore

CD AverageEnglish



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Comparison of English-Speaking Students

CoreAverage

Comparative DistrictAverage

TotalEnglish



Core Average

Comparative

District

Average

Total English

2006 89.0% 73.9% 83.4%

2007 89.5% 74.1% 83.8%

2008 90.5% 79.0% 86.3%

2009 88.2% 76.3% 83.8%

2010 86.7% 72.7% 81.6%

2011 89.2% 80.8% 86.1%

2012 88.5% 79.7% 85.3%

2013 88.9% 79.6% 85.5%

Total Core

Area

Average

Literacy

Score

Core Area

Average

English

Total CD

Area

Average

Literacy

Score

CD Average

EnglishTotal English

NJ Average U.S. Average

2006 88.4% 89.0% 80.2% 73.9% 83.4% 82.5% 68.0%

2007 86.2% 89.5% 80.9% 74.1% 83.8%

2008 88.5% 90.5% 83.0% 79.0% 86.3% 80.6% 66.2%

2009 74.1% 88.2% 67.6% 76.3% 83.8% 65.7%

2010 72.6% 86.7% 66.3% 72.7% 81.6% 82.7%

2011 75.4% 89.2% 66.2% 80.8% 86.1% 76.1% 66.8%

2012 67.2% 88.5% 61.6% 79.7% 85.3% 78.1% 61.9%

2013 70.6% 88.9% 66.7% 79.6% 85.5% 75.0% 70.6%


Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty

54

Documents

NAG_LAL