Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1

NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014

Core Area Grades 3 through 5

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average

Grade 3 91.3% 92.1% 90.3% 84.1% 84.0% 87.1% 87.6% 83.0% 82.1% 86.8%

Grade 4 91.1% 89.4% 88.4% 80.1% 86.9% 86.9% 85.2% 85.2% 82.1% 86.1%

Grade 5 90.8% 90.8% 82.5% 85.0% 87.1% 88.0% 90.5% 86.5% 84.5% 87.3%

NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014

Includes: Bloomingdale, Butler, Kinnelon, Lincoln Park, Oakland, Pequannock,

Pompton Lakes, Ringwood, Riverdale, Wanaque, West Milford, and Wayne

Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau

Suburban Trends Area

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3

School

District Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequannock Pompton Lks Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford

Core Area

Average

2014

Gr. 3 81.0% 81.2% 93.3% 88.9% 81.6% 80.9% 84.9% 84.3% 86.5% 84.3% 67.7% 70.8% 82.1%

Gr. 4 78.2% 88.4% 88.2% 82.5% 89.8% 79.5% 78.0% 84.3% 94.5% 82.4% 57.0% 78.6% 81.8%

Gr. 5 78.5% 88.7% 93.2% 91.3% 87.1% 88.1% 88.6% 85.5% 77.8% 88.0% 59.5% 81.5% 84.0%

2013

Gr. 3 81.0% 86.0% 93.0% 88.0% 81.7% 89.0% 78.1% 80.0% 92.0% 80.0% 65.0% 82.0% 83.0%

Gr. 4 79.9% 79.0% 90.0% 88.0% 76.3% 87.0% 77.4% 89.0% 93.0% 88.0% 85.0% 85.0% 84.8%

Gr. 5 92.7% 91.0% 92.0% 96.0% 88.0% 81.0% 79.8% 86.0% 84.0% 87.0% 82.0% 84.5% 87.0%

2012

Gr. 3 90.0% 75.0% 91.0% 89.8% 90.3% 90.0% 79.0% 91.0% 91.0% 87.2% 85.0% 94.0% 87.8%

Gr. 4 65.0% 93.0% 94.0%92.0%

82.3% 75.0% 73.0% 94.0% 82.9% 88.5% 77.5% 83.4%

Gr. 5 83.0% 91.0% 96.0% 98.0% 86.3% 90.0% 87.5% 80.0% 96.0% 88.1% 90.0% 92.5% 89.9%

2011

Gr. 3 85.9% 92.0% 95.8% 89.8% 86.9% 86.0% 81.7% 82.5% 82.2% 86.8% 81.3% 92.7% 87.0%

Gr. 4 61.8% 79.5% 94.7% 94.1% 89.2% 91.0% 78.6% 80.6% 92.9% 84.1% 84.7% 86.3% 84.8%

Gr. 5 73.3% 86.3% 94.2% 94.4% 81.2% 97.6% 84.6% 81.9% 89.3% 76.5% 89.7% 92.3% 86.8%

2010

Gr. 3 70.7% 84.6% 89.7% 95.2% 83.1% 88.1% 79.6% 81.9% 68.0% 78.1% 84.1% 91.8% 82.9%

Gr. 4 75.3% 80.7% 89.2% 97.4% 81.4% 97.7% 77.6% 83.4% 82.1% 89.1% 87.8% 89.4% 85.9%

Gr. 5 69.5% 89.0% 95.1% 93.4% 91.2% 90.7% 82.8% 87.0% 87.1% 83.7% 80.9% 77.1% 85.6%

2009

Gr. 3 78.1% 80.7% 83.5% 92.5% 83.5% 95.4% 61.8% 98.5% 86.2% 81.5% 81.0% 80.8% 83.6%

Gr. 4 60.2% 73.0% 75.7% 91.1% 90.7% 88.7% 69.5% 79.4% 84.4% 66.3% 83.8% 78.1% 78.4%

Gr. 5 60.7% 78.3% 92.8% 92.3% 89.8% 93.0% 79.1% 80.6% 88.2% 80.5% 80.0% 80.9% 83.0%

2008

Gr. 3 82.1% 90.8% 94.0% 95.4% 94.8% 92.6% 76.5% 93.8% 95.9% 83.9% 81.6% 94.3% 89.6%

Gr. 4 86.7% 89.6% 95.1% 89.8% 92.4% 97.0% 74.5% 89.9% 83.9% 80.8% 87.7% 91.8% 88.3%

Gr. 5 71.9% 75.4% 92.0% 91.8% 86.4% 86.2% 82.9% 75.5% 76.7% 74.7% 82.1% 83.4% 81.6%

2007

Gr. 3 87.1% 83.8% 99.4% 97.0% 95.8% 97.0% 96.3% 83.4% 90.6% 84.9% 91.7% 93.6% 91.7%

Gr. 4 89.8% 91.0% 92.7% 94.9% 94.9% 90.3% 88.5% 88.9% 87.5% 72.7% 89.8% 91.9% 89.4%

Gr. 5 75.4% 84.5% 98.0% 92.6% 98.4% 93.2% 89.9% 98.4% 89.7% 76.6% 87.9% 89.8% 89.5%

2006

Gr. 3 78.4% 92.7% 92.4% 96.1% 95.5% 96.6% 91.2% 88.3% 86.7% 87.0% 86.6% 91.3% 90.2%

Gr. 4 86.2% 95.0% 93.2% 96.5% 97.1% 91.4% 90.7% 82.6% 93.1% 82.4% 92.2% 87.6% 90.7%

Gr. 5 80.5% 79.6% 98.3% 81.6% 96.9% 92.1% 89.9% 87.5% 96.1% 90.9% 89.9% 96.3% 90.0%

Core Study Area Score Averages 2006-2014

NJASK Math

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

90.2%

90.7%

90.0%91.7%

89.4%

89.5%89.6% 88.3%

81.6%83.6%

78.4%

83.0% 82.9%

85.9% 85.6% 87.0%84.8%

86.8%87.8%

83.4%

89.9%

83.0%84.8%

87.0%

82.1%

81.8%84.0%

NJASK Math Core Area Averages by Grade

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%

2 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3%

3 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%

4 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6%

5 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5%

6 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0%

7 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%

8 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7%

9 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5%

10 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1%

11 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5%

12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0%

2 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0%

3 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0%

4 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0%

5 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0%

6 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5%

7 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%

8 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7%

9 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0%

10 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0%

11 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8%

12 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5%

2 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%

3 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0%

4 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%

5 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%

6 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0%

7 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0%

8 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0%

9 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1%

10 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0%

11 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5%

12 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2%

2 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3%

3 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3%

4 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4%

5 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%

6 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5%

7 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6%

8 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3%

9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9%

10 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3%

11 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6%

12 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4%

2 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1%

3 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1%

4 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7%

5 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0%

6 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9%

7 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%

8 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0%

9 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8%

10 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7%

11 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5%

12 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6%

2 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0%

3 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3%

4 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2%

5 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8%

6 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%

7 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5%

8 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0%

9 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9%

10 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3%

11 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7%

12 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7%

2 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8%

3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%

4 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4%

5 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0%

6 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5%

7 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2%

8 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4%

9 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7%

10 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9%

11 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1%

12 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0%

2 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6%

3 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2%

4 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9%

5 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

6 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8%

7 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9%

8 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7%

9 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4%

10 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6%

11 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5%

12 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1%

2 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6%

3 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%

4 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6%

5 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3%

6 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%

7 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9%

8 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5%

9 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9%

10 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1%

11 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9%

12 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5%

NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 3

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%

2 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%

3 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7%

4 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%

5 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5%

6 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3%

7 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0%

8 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1%

9 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5%

10 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5%

11 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6%

12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0%

2 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0%

3 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0%

4 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0%

5 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0%

6 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0%

7 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0%

8 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5%

9 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7%

10 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0%

11 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8%

12 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%

2 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%

3 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0%

4 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0%

5 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0%

6 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1%

7 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%

8 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5%

9 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0%

10 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5%

11 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0%

12 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2%

2 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4%

3 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3%

4 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6%

5 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%

6 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3%

7 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7%

8 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5%

9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9%

10 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3%

11 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6%

12 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7%

2 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4%

3 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1%

4 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1%

5 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7%

6 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9%

7 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0%

8 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1%

9 Oakland83.1%

81.4% 91.2%

10 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0%

11 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8%

12 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3%

2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%

3 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0%

4 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2%

5 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0%

6 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6%

7 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9%

8 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8%

9 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3%

10 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%

11 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5%

12 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2%

2 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0%

3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%

4 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4%

5 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5%

6 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8%

7 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4%

8 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1%

9 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9%

10 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7%

11 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7%

12 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

2 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6%

3 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0%

4 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8%

5 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5%

6 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2%

7 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4%

8 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9%

9 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4%

10 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9%

11 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7%

12 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%

2 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6%

3 Butler 92.7%95.0%

79.6%

4 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3%

5 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1%

6 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9%

7 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1%

8 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9%

9 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%

10 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5%

11 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5%

12 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9%

NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 4

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%

2 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3%

3 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7%

4 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6%

5 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1%

6 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0%

7 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%

8 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5%

9 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5%

10 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5%

11 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%

12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0%

2 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7%

3 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0%

4 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0%

5 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%

6 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0%

7 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0%

8 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5%

9 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0%

10 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0%

11 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0%

12 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0%

2 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%

3 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%

4 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5%

5 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0%

6 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0%

7 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0%

8 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1%

9 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5%

10 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%

11 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0%

12 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6%

2 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4%

3 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2%

4 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3%

5 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7%

6 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3%

7 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3%

8 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6%

9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9%

10 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%

11 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5%

12 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1%

2 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4%

3 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%

4 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7%

5 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0%

6 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1%

7 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0%

8 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7%

9 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8%

10 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9%

11 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1%

12 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0%

2 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8%

3 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3%

4 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%

5 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2%

6 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9%

7 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6%

8 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5%

9 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0%

10 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%

11 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3%

12 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0%

2 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8%

3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%

4 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2%

5 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4%

6 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9%

7 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1%

8 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7%

9 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5%

10 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4%

11 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7%

12 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4%

2 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%

3 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0%

4 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2%

5 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6%

6 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9%

7 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8%

8 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7%

9 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9%

10 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5%

11 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6%

12 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3%

2 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%

3 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%

4 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1%

5 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1%

6 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9%

7 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9%

8 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9%

9 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5%

10 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6%

11 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5%

12 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6%

NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 5

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8

2014 Kinnelon 93.3% 2014 Riverdale 94.5% 2014 Kinnelon 93.2%

2013 Kinnelon 93.0% 2013 Riverdale 93.0% 2013 Lincoln Park 96.0%

2012 West Milford 94.0% 2012 Kinnelon 94.0% 2012 Lincoln Park 98.0%

2011 Kinnelon 95.8% 2011 Kinnelon 94.7% 2011 Pequannock 97.6%

2010 Lincoln Park 95.2% 2010 Pequannock 97.7% 2010 Kinnelon 95.1%

2009 Ringwood 98.5% 2009 Lincoln Park 91.1% 2009 Pequannock 93.0%

2008 Riverdale 95.9% 2008 Pequannock 97.0% 2008 Kinnelon 92.0%

2007 Kinnelon 99.4% 2007 Oakland 94.9% 2007 Ringwood 98.4%

2006 Pequannock 96.6% 2006 Oakland 97.1% 2006 Kinnelon 98.3%

Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking

89.0%

90.0%

91.0%

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%

KinnelonKinnelonWestMilford

KinnelonLincoln ParkRingwoodRiverdaleKinnelonPequannock

201420132012201120102009200820072006

93.3%93.0%

94.0%

95.8%

95.2%

98.5%

95.9%

99.4%

96.6%

Core Area Grade 3 First Place Math Rankings

2006-2014

86.0%

87.0%

88.0%

89.0%

90.0%

91.0%

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%

Riverdale Riverdale Kinnelon Kinnelon Pequannock Lincoln Park Pequannock Oakland Oakland

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

94.5%

93.0%

94.0%

94.7%

97.7%

91.1%

97.0%

94.9%

97.1%

Core Area Grade 4 First Place Math Rankings

2006-2014

88.0%

89.0%

90.0%

91.0%

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%

Kinnelon Lincoln Park Lincoln Park Pequannock Kinnelon Pequannock Kinnelon Ringwood Kinnelon

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

93.2%

96.0%

98.0%

97.6%

95.1%

93.0%

92.0%

98.4% 98.3%

Core Area Grade 5 First Place Math Rankings

2006-2014

NJASK Core Study Area Math First-Place Rankings by Year

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%2

00

6

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

14

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

0.0%

0.4% 0.4% 0.5%

0.1%

-2.6%

0.8%

0.3%

3.1% 2.8%

1.8%

1.3%

5.8% 6.0%

3.6%

5.2%

4.6%

5.5%

3.0%

3.9%

5.9%

1.2%

3.6%

4.3%

0.4% 0.4%

1.7%

NJASK Core Study Area Math Score Changes by Percent

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10

-25.0%

-20.0%

-15.0%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%2

01

4

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

06

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

Comparison of Core Study Area NJASK Math Score Changes by Percent

Bloomingdale

Butler

Kinnelon

Lincoln Park

Oakland

Pequanock

Pompton Lakes

Ringwood

Riverdale

Wanaque

Wayne

West Milford

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11

2014 Gr. 3

1 Kinnelon 11.3%

2 Lincoln Park 6.9%

3 Riverdale 4.5%

4 Oakland 3.0%

5

Pompton

Lakes 2.9%

6 Ringwood 2.3%

7 Wanaque 2.2%

8 Butler -0.8%

9 Bloomingdale -1.0%

10 Pequanock -1.1%

11 West Milford -11.2%

12 Wayne -14.3%

2013 Gr. 3

1 Kinnelon 11.0%

2 Riverdale 10.0%

3 Pequanock 7.0%

4 Lincoln Park 6.0%

5 Butler 4.0%

6 Oakland 2.0%

7 West Milford 0.0%

8 Bloomingdale -1.0%

9 Ringwood -2.0%

10 Wanaque -2.0%

11Pompton

Lakes -3.9%

12 Wayne -17.0%

2012 Gr. 3

1 West Milford 9.3%

2 Kinnelon 6.3%

3 Ringwood 6.3%

4 Riverdale 6.3%

5 Bloomingdale 5.3%

6 Pequanock 5.3%

7 Lincoln Park 5.1%

8 Oakland 4.3%

9 Wanaque 2.5%

10 Wayne 0.3%

11Pompton

Lakes -5.7%

12 Butler -9.7%

2011 Gr. 3

1 Oakland 13.9%

2 Kinnelon 13.2%

3 West Milford 10.1%

4 Butler 9.4%

5 Lincoln Park 7.2%

6 Wanaque 4.2%

7 Pequanock 3.4%

8 Bloomingdale 3.3%

9 Ringwood -0.1%

10 Riverdale -0.4%

11Pompton

Lakes -0.9%

12 Wayne -1.3%

2010 Gr. 3

1 Lincoln Park 17.7%

2 West Milford 14.3%

3 Kinnelon 12.2%

4 Pequanock 10.6%

5 Oakland 10.0%

6 Butler 7.1%

7 Wayne 6.6%

8 Ringwood 4.4%

9Pompton

Lakes 2.1%

10 Wanaque 0.6%

11 Bloomingdale -6.8%

12 Riverdale -9.5%

2009 Gr. 3

1 Ringwood 17.4%

2 Pequanock 14.3%

3 Lincoln Park 11.4%

4 Oakland 5.2%

5 Riverdale 5.1%

6 Kinnelon 2.4%

7 Wanaque 0.4%

8 Wayne -0.1%

9 West Milford -0.3%

10 Butler -0.4%

11 Bloomingdale -3.0%

12Pompton

Lakes -19.3%

2008 Gr. 3

1 Riverdale 5.8%

2Pompton

Lakes 5.4%

3 Lincoln Park 5.3%

4 West Milford 4.2%

5 Kinnelon 3.9%

6 Ringwood 3.7%

7 Pequanock 2.5%

8 Oakland 0.8%

9 Butler 0.7%

10 Wanaque -6.3%

11 Bloomingdale -8.0%

12 Wayne -8.5%

2007 Gr. 3

1 Kinnelon 8.0%

2 Oakland 6.3%

3 Pequanock 5.6%

4 Lincoln Park 5.6%

5Pompton

Lakes 4.9%

6 West Milford 2.2%

7 Wayne 0.3%

8 Riverdale -0.8%

9 Bloomingdale -4.3%

10 Wanaque -6.5%

11 Butler -7.6%

12 Ringwood -8.0%

2006 Gr. 3

1 Oakland 9.4%

2 Pequanock 6.0%

3 Lincoln Park 5.5%

4 Butler 2.1%

5 Kinnelon 1.8%

6 West Milford 0.7%

7Pompton

Lakes 0.6%

8 Ringwood -2.3%

9 Wanaque -3.7%

10 Riverdale -3.9%

11 Wayne -4.1%

12 Bloomingdale -12.2%

NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12

2014 Gr. 4

1 Riverdale 13.6%

2 Butler 7.5%

3 Kinnelon 7.3%

4 Ringwood 3.4%

5 Oakland 3.3%

6 Lincoln Park 1.6%

7 Wanaque 1.5%

8 Pequanock -1.4%

9 West Milford -2.3%

10 Bloomingdale -2.7%

11Pompton

Lakes -2.9%

12 Wayne -23.9%

2013 Gr. 4

1 Riverdale 11.1%

2 Kinnelon 8.1%

3 Ringwood 7.1%

4 Lincoln Park 6.1%

5 Wanaque 6.1%

6 Pequanock 5.1%

7 Wayne 3.1%

8 Oakland 3.1%

9 West Milford 3.1%

10 Bloomingdale -2.0%

11 Butler -2.9%

12Pompton

Lakes -4.6%

2012 Gr. 4

1 Oakland 14.4%

2 Kinnelon 13.4%

3 Riverdale 13.4%

4 Butler 12.4%

5 Lincoln Park 11.4%

6 Wayne 7.9%

7 Wanaque 2.2%

8 West Milford -3.1%

9 Pequanock -5.6%

10

Pompton

Lakes -7.6%

11 Bloomingdale -15.6%

12 Ringwood

2011 Gr. 4

1 Kinnelon 14.1%

2 Lincoln Park 13.5%

3 Oakland 12.7%

4 Riverdale 12.3%

5 Pequanock 10.4%

6 West Milford 5.7%

7 Wayne 4.1%

8 Wanaque 3.5%

9 Ringwood 0.0%

10 Butler -1.1%

11Pompton

Lakes -2.0%

12 Bloomingdale -18.8%

2010 Gr. 4

1 Pequanock 17.3%

2 Lincoln Park 17.0%

3 West Milford 9.0%

4 Kinnelon 8.8%

5 Wanaque 8.7%

6 Wayne 7.4%

7 Oakland 6.6%

8 Ringwood 3.0%

9 Riverdale 1.7%

10 Butler 0.3%

11Pompton

Lakes -2.8%

12 Bloomingdale -5.1%

2009 Gr. 4

1 Lincoln Park 14.5%

2 Oakland 14.3%

3 Pequanock 12.1%

4 Riverdale 7.8%

5 Wayne 7.2%

6 Ringwood 2.8%

7 West Milford 1.5%

8 Kinnelon -0.9%

9 Butler -3.6%

10Pompton

Lakes -7.1%

11 Wanaque -10.3%

12 Bloomingdale -16.4%

2008 Gr. 4

1 Pequanock 9.1%

2 Kinnelon 7.2%

3 West Milford 3.9%

4 Oakland 3.2%

5 Ringwood 2.0%

6 Lincoln Park 1.9%

7 Butler 1.7%

8 Wayne -0.2%

9 Bloomingdale -1.2%

10 Riverdale -4.0%

11 Wanaque -7.1%

12Pompton

Lakes -13.6%

2007 Gr. 4

1 Oakland 8.2%

2 Lincoln Park 5.3%

3 Kinnelon 3.1%

4 West Milford 2.3%

5 Butler 1.4%

6 Pequanock 0.7%

7 Bloomingdale 0.2%

8 Wayne 0.2%

9 Ringwood -0.7%

10Pompton

Lakes -1.1%

11 Riverdale -2.1%

12 Wanaque -16.9%

2006 Gr. 4

1 Lincoln Park 6.6%

2 Butler 5.1%

3 Kinnelon 3.3%

4 Riverdale 3.2%

5 Oakland 2.8%

6 Wayne 2.3%

7 Pequanock 1.5%

8Pompton

Lakes 0.7%

9 West Milford -2.3%

10 Bloomingdale -3.7%

11 Ringwood -7.3%

12 Wanaque -7.5%

NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 4

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13

NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5

2014 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 10.9%

2 Lincoln Park 9.0%

3 Butler 6.4%

4

Pompton

Lakes 6.3%

5 Pequanock 5.8%

6 Wanaque 5.7%

7 Oakland 5.2%

8 Ringwood 3.2%

9 West Milford -0.8%

10 Bloomingdale -3.8%

11 Riverdale -4.5%

12 Wayne -22.8%

2013 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 13.1%

2 Bloomingdale 9.8%

3 Kinnelon 9.1%

4 Butler 8.1%

5 Oakland 7.1%

6 Wanaque 4.1%

7 Ringwood 3.1%

8 West Milford 1.6%

9 Riverdale 1.1%

10 Wayne -0.9%

11 Pequanock -1.9%

12Pompton

Lakes -3.1%

2012 Gr. 5

1 Lincoln Park 13.7%

2 Kinnelon 11.7%

3 Riverdale 11.7%

4 West Milford 8.2%

5 Butler 6.7%

6 Oakland 6.7%

7 Pequanock 5.7%

8 Wayne 5.7%

9 Wanaque 3.7%

10

Pompton

Lakes 3.2%

11 Bloomingdale -1.3%

12 Ringwood -4.3%

2011 Gr. 5

1 Pequanock 15.7%

2 Lincoln Park 12.5%

3 Kinnelon 12.3%

4 West Milford 10.4%

5 Wayne 7.8%

6 Riverdale 7.4%

7 Oakland 7.0%

8 Butler 4.4%

9Pompton

Lakes 2.6%

10 Ringwood 0.0%

11 Wanaque -5.4%

12 Bloomingdale -8.6%

2010 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 12.9%

2 Oakland 12.4%

3 Lincoln Park 11.2%

4 Pequanock 8.4%

5 Butler 6.7%

6 Riverdale 4.8%

7 Ringwood 4.7%

8 Wanaque 1.4%

9Pompton

Lakes 0.5%

10 Wayne -1.4%

11 West Milford -5.2%

12 Bloomingdale -12.8%

2009 Gr. 5

1 Pequanock 12.0%

2 Kinnelon 11.8%

3 Lincoln Park 11.3%

4 Riverdale 7.2%

5 Oakland 0.8%

6 West Milford -0.1%

7 Ringwood -0.4%

8 Wanaque -0.5%

9 Wayne -1.0%

10Pompton

Lakes -1.9%

11 Butler -2.7%

12 Bloomingdale -20.3%

2008 Gr. 5

1 Oakland 15.0%

2 Kinnelon 14.5%

3 Lincoln Park 14.3%

4 Pequanock 8.7%

5 West Milford 5.9%

6 Wayne 4.6%

7 Riverdale -0.8%

8 Ringwood -2.0%

9 Butler -2.1%

10 Wanaque -2.8%

11 Bloomingdale -5.6%

12Pompton

Lakes -13.4%

2007 Gr. 5

1 Ringwood 6.5%

2 Kinnelon 6.1%

3 Oakland 3.4%

4 Pequanock 1.3%

5 Lincoln Park 0.7%

6Pompton

Lakes -2.0%

7 West Milford -2.1%

8 Riverdale -2.2%

9 Wayne -4.0%

10 Butler -7.4%

11 Wanaque -15.3%

12 Bloomingdale -16.5%

2006 Gr. 5

1 Kinnelon 8.7%

2 Oakland 7.2%

3 West Milford 6.8%

4 Riverdale 6.5%

5 Pequanock 2.5%

6 Wanaque 1.3%

7Pompton

Lakes 0.3%

8 Wayne 0.3%

9 Ringwood -2.1%

10 Lincoln Park -8.0%

11 Bloomingdale -9.1%

12 Butler -10.0%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14

Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking

2014 Kinnelon 11.3%

2013 Kinnelon 11.0%

2012 West Milford 9.3%

2011 Oakland 13.9%

2010 Lincoln Park 17.7%

2009 Ringwood 17.4%

2008 Riverdale 5.8%

2007 Kinnelon 8.0%

2006 Oakland 9.4%

2014 Riverdale 13.6%

2013 Riverdale 11.1%

2012 Oakland 14.4%

2011 Kinnelon 14.1%

2010 Pequanock 17.3%

2009 Lincoln Park 14.5%

2008 Pequanock 9.1%

2007 Oakland 8.2%

2006 Lincoln Park 6.6%

Grade 4- First-Place Ranking Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking

2014 Kinnelon 10.9%

2013 Lincoln Park 13.1%

2012 Lincoln Park 13.7%

2011 Pequanock 15.7%

2010 Kinnelon 12.9%

2009 Pequanock 12.0%

2008 Oakland 15.0%

2007 Ringwood 6.5%

2006 Kinnelon 8.7%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

12.0%

13.0%

14.0%

15.0%

16.0%

17.0%

18.0%

KinnelonKinnelonWestMilford

OaklandLincolnPark

RingwoodRiverdaleKinnelonOakland

201420132012201120102009200820072006

11.3%11.0%

9.3%

13.9%

17.7%17.4%

5.8%

8.0%

9.4%

Core Area Grade 3 First Place Math Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

12.0%

13.0%

14.0%

15.0%

16.0%

17.0%

18.0%

RiverdaleRiverdaleOaklandKinnelonPequanockLincolnPark

PequanockOaklandLincolnPark

201420132012201120102009200820072006

13.6%

11.1%

14.4%14.1%

17.3%

14.5%

9.1%8.2%

6.6%

Core Area Grade 4 First Place Math Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

12.0%

KinnelonLincolnPark

LincolnPark

PequanockKinnelonPequanockOaklandRingwoodKinnelon

201420132012201120102009200820072006

10.9%

13.1%13.7%15.7%12.9%12.0%15.0%

6.5%

8.7%

Core Area Grade 5 First Place Math Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

NJASK Core Area First-Place Math Rankings by Percentage

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15

Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock

Pompton

Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Average

2014

Gr. 3 -1.0% -0.8% 11.3% 6.9% 3.0% -1.1% 2.9% 2.3% 4.5% 2.2% -14.3% -11.2% 0.4%

Gr. 4 -2.7% 7.5% 7.3% 1.6% 3.3% -1.4% -2.9% 3.4% 13.6% 1.5% -23.9% -2.3% 0.4%

Gr. 5 -3.8% 6.4% 10.9% 9.0% 5.2% 5.8% 6.3% 3.2% -4.5% 5.7% -22.8% -0.8% 1.7%

2013

Gr. 3 -1.0% 4.0% 11.0% 6.0% 2.0% 7.0% -3.9% -2.0% 10.0% -2.0% -17.0% 0.0% 1.2%

Gr. 4 -2.0% -2.9% 8.1% 6.1% 3.1% 5.1% -4.6% 7.1% 11.1% 6.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.6%

Gr. 5 9.8% 8.1% 9.1% 13.1% 7.1% -1.9% -3.1% 3.1% 1.1% 4.1% -0.9% 1.6% 4.3%

2012

Gr. 3 5.3% -9.7% 6.3% 5.1% 4.3% 5.3% -5.7% 6.3% 6.3% 2.5% 0.3% 9.3% 3.0%

Gr. 4 -15.6% 12.4% 13.4% 11.4% 14.4% -5.6% -7.6% 13.4% 2.2% 7.9% -3.1% 3.9%

Gr. 5 -1.3% 6.7% 11.7% 13.7% 6.7% 5.7% 3.2% -4.3% 11.7% 3.7% 5.7% 8.2% 5.9%

2011

Gr. 3 3.3% 9.4% 13.2% 7.2% 13.9% 3.4% -0.9% -0.1% -0.4% 4.2% -1.3% 10.1% 5.2%

Gr. 4 -18.8% -1.1% 14.1% 13.5% 12.7% 10.4% -2.0% 0.0% 12.3% 3.5% 4.1% 5.7% 4.6%

Gr. 5 -8.6% 4.4% 12.3% 12.5% 7.0% 15.7% 2.6% 0.0% 7.4% -5.4% 7.8% 10.4% 5.5%

2010

Gr. 3 -6.8% 7.1% 12.2% 17.7% 10.0% 10.6% 2.1% 4.4% -9.5% 0.6% 6.6% 14.3% 5.8%

Gr. 4 -5.1% 0.3% 8.8% 17.0% 6.6% 17.3% -2.8% 3.0% 1.7% 8.7% 7.4% 9.0% 6.0%

Gr. 5 -12.8% 6.7% 12.9% 11.2% 12.4% 8.4% 0.5% 4.7% 4.8% 1.4% -1.4% -5.2% 3.6%

2009

Gr. 3 -3.0% -0.4% 2.4% 11.4% 5.2% 14.3% -19.3% 17.4% 5.1% 0.4% -0.1% -0.3% 2.8%

Gr. 4 -16.4% -3.6% -0.9% 14.5% 14.3% 12.1% -7.1% 2.8% 7.8% -10.3% 7.2% 1.5% 1.8%

Gr. 5 -20.3% -2.7% 11.8% 11.3% 0.8% 12.0% -1.9% -0.4% 7.2% -0.5% -1.0% -0.1% 1.3%

2008

Gr. 3 -8.0% 0.7% 3.9% 5.3% 0.8% 2.5% 5.4% 3.7% 5.8% -6.3% -8.5% 4.2% 0.8%

Gr. 4 -1.2% 1.7% 7.2% 1.9% 3.2% 9.1% -13.6% 2.0% -4.0% -7.1% -0.2% 3.9% 0.3%

Gr. 5 -5.6% -2.1% 14.5% 14.3% 15.0% 8.7% -13.4% -2.0% -0.8% -2.8% 4.6% 5.9% 3.1%

2007

Gr. 3 -4.3% -7.6% 8.0% 5.6% 6.3% 5.6% 4.9% -8.0% -0.8% -6.5% 0.3% 2.2% 0.5%

Gr. 4 0.2% 1.4% 3.1% 5.3% 8.2% 0.7% -1.1% -0.7% -2.1% -16.9% 0.2% 2.3% 0.1%

Gr. 5 -16.5% -7.4% 6.1% 0.7% 3.4% 1.3% -2.0% 6.5% -2.2% -15.3% -4.0% -2.1% -2.6%

2006

Gr. 3 -12.2% 2.1% 1.8% 5.5% 9.4% 6.0% 0.6% -2.3% -3.9% -3.7% -4.1% 0.7% 0.0%

Gr. 4 -3.7% 5.1% 3.3% 6.6% 2.8% 1.5% 0.7% -7.3% 3.2% -7.5% 2.3% -2.3% 0.4%

Gr. 5 -9.1% -10.0% 8.7% -8.0% 7.2% 2.5% 0.3% -2.1% 6.5% 1.3% 0.3% 6.8% 0.4%

Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK Math Score Changes

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16

NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014

Comparative District Grades 3 through 5

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg

Grade 3 85.7% 87.4% 89.7% 78.2% 79.9% 79.3% 78.7% 80.2% 81.1% 82.2%

Grade 4 80.9% 83.6% 85.5% 75.4% 77.3% 80.5% 78.1% 80.6% 79.3% 80.1%

Grade 5 83.9% 82.8% 79.6% 78.6% 79.6% 82.5% 86.8% 81.9% 84.4% 82.2%

Suburban Trends Area Comparative District ChartNJASK Math Scores 2006-2014

Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau

Includes: Franklin Lakes, Jefferson Township, Margate City, Paterson (Select),

Tenafly, Totowa and Ventnor City

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18

School

District Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin LakesPaterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly

Comparative

Distr. Avg.

2014

Gr. 3 87.1% 82.2% 87.8% 60.4% 95.7% 65.5% 89.2% 81.1%

Gr. 4 83.5% 81.9% 97.3% 61.2% 84.5% 56.1% 90.4% 79.3%

Gr. 5 94.8% 77.1% 94.2% 60.6% 89.6% 78.7% 95.9% 84.4%

2013

Gr. 3 80.5% 84.0% 97.0% 56.0% 88.0% 65.0% 91.0% 80.2%

Gr. 4 82.0% 83.0% 87.0% 53.3% 93.0% 71.0% 95.0% 80.6%

Gr. 5 91.0% 73.0% 89.0% 59.3% 81.0% 81.0% 99.0% 81.9%

2012

Gr. 3 87.0% 80.0% 89.0% 54.0% 92.0% 61.0% 96.0% 78.7%

Gr. 4 83.5% 73.0% 95.0% 52.3% 84.0% 59.0% 100.0% 78.1%

Gr. 5 90.5% 87.0% 98.0% 64.0% 95.0% 80.0% 93.0% 86.8%

2011

Gr. 3 89.4% 74.5% 97.0% 47.1% 83.1% 67.0% 96.9% 79.3%

Gr. 4 83.9% 80.0% 96.9% 55.4% 91.1% 59.2% 96.9% 80.5%

Gr. 5 89.5% 76.2% 98.5% 52.6% 91.1% 75.4% 94.0% 82.5%

2010

Gr. 3 89.0% 76.0% 98.3% 53.9% 91.1% 59.8% 91.0% 79.9%

Gr. 4 82.6% 76.0% 89.3% 51.5% 85.7% 64.4% 91.4% 77.3%

Gr. 5 91.9% 77.0% 96.9% 41.2% 77.8% 75.5% 96.6% 79.6%

2009

Gr. 3 85.6% 69.9% 88.5% 42.1% 92.0% 75.5% 93.6% 78.2%

Gr. 4 81.5% 70.6% 95.4% 46.5% 84.0% 64.4% 85.7% 75.4%

Gr. 5 83.7% 63.4% 96.9% 46.4% 95.0% 67.0% 97.6% 78.6%

2008

Gr. 3 95.8% 93.5% 98.5% 58.5% 98.1% 89.3% 94.5% 89.7%

Gr. 4 93.5% 80.5% 96.8% 58.0% 92.6% 76.8% 100.0% 85.5%

Gr. 5 93.3% 69.4% 100.0% 51.5% 88.9% 58.8% 95.7% 79.6%

2007

Gr. 3 95.3% 84.7% 93.0% 61.7% 100.0% 79.6% 97.5% 87.4%

Gr. 4 87.2% 76.7% 100.0% 55.0% 94.5% 71.7% 100.0% 83.6%

Gr. 5 91.7% 78.8% 95.6% 56.4% 93.4% 63.6% 100.0% 82.8%

2006

Gr. 3 89.7% 84.3% 100.0% 61.2% 100.0% 68.8% 96.0% 85.7%

Gr. 4 83.9% 71.3% 93.9% 53.8% 90.7% 74.2% 98.5% 80.9%

Gr. 5 90.6% 81.7% 97.2% 46.6% 91.4% 82.5% 97.3% 83.9%

NJASK Math

Comparative District Score Averages 2006-2014

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

20

14

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

06

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

80.0%

76.3%

82.8%

77.4%

79.6% 80.7%

70.5%

75.3%

84.9%

76.3% 77.8%

79.8%

76.8% 75.3%

76.7% 76.5%

72.1%

75.5%

88.3%

83.6%

76.3%

86.5%

80.9% 80.6%

83.3%

78.7%

81.7%

NJASK Math Comparative District Averages by Grade

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20

NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 3

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6%

2 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%

3Franklin

Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2%

4Jefferson

Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8%

5 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1%

6 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7%

7 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0%

2 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0%

4 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0%

5Jefferson

Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0%

6 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0%

7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 96.0% 100.0% 93.0%

2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 89.0% 95.0% 98.0%

4Jefferson

Twp 87.0% 83.5% 90.5%

5 Totowa 80.0% 73.0% 87.0%

6 Ventnor City 61.0% 59.0% 80.0%

7 Paterson 54.0% 52.3% 64.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5%

2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0%

3Jefferson

Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5%

4 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1%

5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2%

6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4%

7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%

2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%

4Jefferson

Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%

5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%

6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%

7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%

2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%

4Jefferson

Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%

5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%

6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%

7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0%

2 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9%

3Jefferson

Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3%

4 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7%

5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4%

6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8%

7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4%

2 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0%

3Jefferson

Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7%

4Franklin

Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6%

5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8%

6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6%

7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2%

2 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4%

3 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3%

4Jefferson

Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6%

5 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7%

6 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5%

7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21

NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 4

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2%

2 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%

3 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6%

4Jefferson

Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8%

5 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1%

6 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6%

7 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0%

2 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0%

4 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0%

5Jefferson

Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0%

6 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0%

7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 96.0% 100.0% 93.0%

2Jefferson

Twp 89.0% 95.0% 98.0%

3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

4 Paterson 87.0% 83.5% 90.5%

5 Tenafly 80.0% 73.0% 87.0%

6 Totowa 61.0% 59.0% 80.0%

7 Ventnor City 54.0% 52.3% 64.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5%

2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0%

3 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1%

4Jefferson

Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5%

5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2%

6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4%

7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%

2 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%

3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

4Jefferson

Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%

5 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%

6 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%

7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%

2 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%

3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

4Jefferson

Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%

5 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%

6 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%

7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7%

2Franklin

Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0%

3Jefferson

Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3%

4 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9%

5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4%

6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8%

7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6%

2 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0%

3 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4%

4Jefferson

Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7%

5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8%

6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6%

7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3%

2Franklin

Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2%

3 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4%

4Jefferson

Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6%

5 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5%

6 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7%

7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22

2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%

2Jefferson

Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8%

3Franklin

Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2%

4 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6%

5 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7%

6 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1%

7 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6%

2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0%

2Jefferson

Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0%

4 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0%

5 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0%

6 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0%

7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3%

2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 89.0% 95.0% 98.0%

2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

3 Tenafly 96.0% 100.0% 93.0%

4Jefferson

Twp 87.0% 83.5% 90.5%

5 Totowa 80.0% 73.0% 87.0%

6 Ventnor City 61.0% 59.0% 80.0%

7 Paterson 54.0% 52.3% 64.0%

2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5%

2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0%

3 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1%

4Jefferson

Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5%

5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2%

6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4%

7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6%

2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%

2Franklin

Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%

3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

4Jefferson

Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%

5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%

6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%

7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%

2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%

2Franklin

Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%

3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%

4Jefferson

Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%

5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%

6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%

7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%

2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0%

2 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7%

3Jefferson

Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3%

4 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9%

5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4%

6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8%

7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5%

2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0%

2Franklin

Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6%

3 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4%

4Jefferson

Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7%

5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8%

6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6%

7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4%

2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3%

2Franklin

Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2%

3 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4%

4Jefferson

Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6%

5 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5%

6 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7%

7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%

NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 5

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23

86.0%

87.0%

88.0%

89.0%

90.0%

91.0%

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%

MargateCity

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

201420132012201120102009200820072006

95.7%

91.0%

96.0%

97.0%

93.6%93.6%

98.5%

100.0%100.0%

Comparative DistrictGrade 3 First Place Math Rankings

2006-2014

92.0%

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%

MargateCity

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

201420132012201120102009200820072006

97.3%

95.0%

100.0%

96.9%

95.4%95.4%

100.0%100.0%

98.5%

Comparative DistrictGrade 4 First Place Math Rankings

2006-2014

93.0%

94.0%

95.0%

96.0%

97.0%

98.0%

99.0%

100.0%

MargateCity

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

201420132012201120102009200820072006

95.9%

99.0%

98.0%

98.5%

97.6%97.6%

100.0%100.0%

97.3%

Comparative DistrictGrade 5 First Place Math Rankings

2006-2014

Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking

NJASK Comparative District Math First-Place Rankings By Year

2014Franklin

Lakes 97.3%

2013 Tenafly 95.0%

2012Franklin

Lakes 100.0%

2011Franklin

Lakes 96.9%

2010Franklin

Lakes 95.4%

2009Franklin

Lakes 95.4%

2008 Tenafly 100.0%

2007Franklin

Lakes 100.0%

2006 Tenafly 98.5%

2014 Margate City 95.7%

2013 Tenafly 91.0%

2012 Tenafly 96.0%

2011Franklin

Lakes 97.0%

2010 Tenafly 93.6%

2009 Tenafly 93.6%

2008Franklin

Lakes 98.5%

2007 Margate City 100.0%

2006Franklin

Lakes 100.0%

2014Franklin

Lakes 97.3%

2013 Tenafly 95.0%

2012Franklin

Lakes 100.0%

2011Franklin

Lakes 96.9%

2010Franklin

Lakes 95.4%

2009Franklin

Lakes 95.4%

2008 Tenafly 100.0%

2007Franklin

Lakes 100.0%

2006 Tenafly 98.5%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24

-15.0%-14.0%-13.0%-12.0%-11.0%-10.0%

-9.0%-8.0%-7.0%-6.0%-5.0%-4.0%-3.0%-2.0%-1.0%0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%

10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%18.0%19.0%20.0%

20

06

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

07

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

08

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

09

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

10

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

11

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

12

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

13

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

20

14

Gr.

3

Gr.

4

Gr.

5

-5.5%

-9.7%

-12.2%

-4.3% -5.3%

-14.6%

-4.0% -4.9%

8.0%

4.4%

-2.0%

-4.3%

7.0%

2.6%

4.0%

5.4%

2.4%

8.8%

-7.4%

8.1%

12.8%

3.5%

9.0%

7.4%

4.4%

2.9%

11.9%

NJASK Comparative District Math Score Changes by Percent

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25

-50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%

2014

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2013

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2012

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2011

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2010

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2009

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2008

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2007

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

2006

Gr. 3

Gr. 4

Gr. 5

Franklin Lakes

Jefferson Twp

Margate City

Paterson

Tenafly

Totowa

Ventnor City

Comparison of Comparative District

NJASK Math Score Changes by Percent

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26

NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3

2014 Gr. 3

1 Margate City 20.1%

2 Tenafly 13.6%

3Franklin

Lakes 12.2%

4Jefferson

Twp 11.5%

5 Totowa 6.6%

6 Ventnor City -10.1%

7 Paterson -15.2%

2013 Gr. 3

1Franklin

Lakes 23.1%

2 Tenafly 17.1%

3 Margate City 14.1%

4 Totowa 10.1%

5Jefferson

Twp 6.6%

6 Ventnor City -8.9%

7 Paterson -17.9%

2012 Gr. 3

1 Tenafly 18.1%

2 Margate City 14.1%

3Franklin

Lakes 11.1%

4Jefferson

Twp 9.1%

5 Totowa 2.1%

6 Ventnor City -16.9%

7 Paterson -23.9%

2011 Gr. 3

1Franklin

Lakes 26.1%

2 Tenafly 26.0%

3Jefferson

Twp 18.4%

4 Margate City 12.2%

5 Totowa 3.6%

6 Ventnor City -3.9%

7 Paterson -23.8%

2010 Gr. 3

1Franklin

Lakes 28.5%

2 Margate City 21.3%

3 Tenafly 21.2%

4Jefferson

Twp 19.2%

5 Totowa 6.2%

6 Ventnor City -10.0%

7 Paterson -15.9%

2009 Gr. 3

1 Tenafly 21.6%

2 Margate City 20.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 16.5%

4Jefferson

Twp 13.6%

5 Ventnor City 3.5%

6 Totowa -2.1%

7 Paterson -29.9%

2008 Gr. 3

1Franklin

Lakes 6.2%

2 Margate City 5.8%

3Jefferson

Twp 3.5%

4 Tenafly 2.2%

5 Totowa 1.2%

6 Ventnor City -3.0%

7 Paterson -33.8%

2007 Gr. 3

1 Margate City 9.3%

2 Tenafly 6.8%

3Jefferson

Twp 4.5%

4Franklin

Lakes 2.3%

5 Totowa -6.0%

6 Ventnor City -11.1%

7 Paterson -29.0%

2006 Gr. 3

1Franklin

Lakes 11.2%

2 Margate City 11.2%

3 Tenafly 7.2%

4Jefferson

Twp0.9%

5 Totowa-4.5%

6 Ventnor City -20.0%

7 Paterson -27.6%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27

2010 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 18.8%

2Franklin

Lakes 16.7%

3 Margate City 13.1%

4Jefferson

Twp 9.9%

5 Totowa 3.4%

6 Ventnor City -8.2%

7 Paterson -21.1%

2009 Gr. 4

1Franklin

Lakes 21.3%

2 Tenafly 11.6%

3 Margate City 9.9%

4Jefferson

Twp 7.4%

5 Totowa -3.5%

6 Ventnor City -9.7%

7 Paterson -27.5%

2008 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 11.5%

2Franklin

Lakes 8.3%

3Jefferson

Twp 4.9%

4 Margate City 4.1%

5 Totowa -8.0%

6 Ventnor City -11.7%

7 Paterson -30.5%

2007 Gr. 3

1 Margate City 9.3%

2 Tenafly 6.8%

3Jefferson

Twp 4.5%

4Franklin

Lakes 2.3%

5 Totowa -6.0%

6 Ventnor City -11.1%

7 Paterson -29.0%

2014 Gr. 4

1Franklin

Lakes 24.0%

2 Tenafly 17.1%

3 Margate City 11.2%

4Jefferson

Twp 10.2%

5 Totowa 8.6%

6 Paterson -12.2%

7 Ventnor City -17.2%

2013 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 24.4%

2 Margate City 22.4%

3Franklin

Lakes 16.4%

4 Totowa 12.4%

5Jefferson

Twp 11.4%

6 Ventnor City 0.4%

7 Paterson -17.2%

2012 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 32.8%

2Franklin

Lakes 27.8%

3 Margate City 16.8%

4Jefferson

Twp 16.3%

5 Totowa 5.8%

6 Ventnor City -8.2%

7 Paterson -14.9%

2011 Gr. 4

1Franklin

Lakes 21.5%

2 Tenafly 21.5%

3 Margate City 15.7%

4Jefferson

Twp 8.5%

5 Totowa 4.6%

6 Ventnor City -16.2%

7 Paterson -20.0%

2006 Gr. 4

1 Tenafly 10.1%

2Franklin

Lakes 5.5%

3 Margate City 2.3%

4Jefferson

Twp -4.6%

5 Ventnor City -14.2%

6 Totowa -17.1%

7 Paterson -34.6%

NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 4

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28

2014 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 25.1%

2Jefferson

Twp 24.0%

3Franklin

Lakes 23.4%

4 Margate City 18.8%

5 Ventnor City 7.9%

6 Totowa 6.3%

7 Paterson -10.3%

2013 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 25.6%

2Jefferson

Twp 17.6%

3Franklin

Lakes 15.6%

4 Margate City 7.6%

5 Ventnor City 7.6%

6 Totowa -0.4%

7 Paterson -14.0%

2012 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 25.9%

2 Margate City 22.9%

3 Tenafly 20.9%

4Jefferson

Twp 18.4%

5 Totowa 14.9%

6 Ventnor City 7.9%

7 Paterson -8.1%

2011 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 27.5%

2 Tenafly 23.0%

3 Margate City 20.1%

4Jefferson

Twp 18.5%

5 Totowa 5.2%

6 Ventnor City 4.4%

7 Paterson -18.4%

2010 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 24.2%

2 Tenafly 23.9%

3Jefferson

Twp 19.2%

4 Margate City 5.1%

5 Totowa 4.3%

6 Ventnor City 2.8%

7 Paterson -31.5%

2009 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 17.8%

2Franklin

Lakes 17.1%

3 Margate City 15.2%

4Jefferson

Twp 3.9%

5 Ventnor City -12.8%

6 Totowa -16.4%

7 Paterson -33.4%

2008 Gr. 5

1Franklin

Lakes 31.7%

2 Tenafly 27.4%

3Jefferson

Twp 25.0%

4 Margate City 20.6%

5 Totowa 1.1%

6 Ventnor City -9.5%

7 Paterson -16.8%

2007 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 4.7%

2Franklin

Lakes 0.3%

3 Margate City -1.9%

4Jefferson

Twp -3.6%

5 Totowa -16.5%

6 Ventnor City -31.7%

7 Paterson -38.9%

2006 Gr. 5

1 Tenafly 3.4%

2Franklin

Lakes 3.3%

3 Margate City -2.5%

4Jefferson

Twp -3.4%

5 Ventnor City -11.4%

6 Totowa -12.2%

7 Paterson -47.3%

NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29

2014 Margate City 20.1%

2013Franklin

Lakes 23.1%

2012 Tenafly 18.1%

2011Franklin

Lakes 26.1%

2010Franklin

Lakes 28.5%

2009 Tenafly 21.6%

2008Franklin

Lakes 6.2%

2007 Margate City 9.3%

2006Franklin

Lakes 11.2%

Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking

2014Franklin

Lakes 24.0%

2013 Tenafly 24.4%

2012 Tenafly 18.1%

2011 Tenafly 32.8%

2010Franklin

Lakes 21.5%

2009 Tenafly 18.8%

2008Franklin

Lakes 21.3%

2007 Tenafly 11.5%

2006 Tenafly 10.1%

Grade 4 - First-Place Ranking

2014 Tenafly 25.1%

2013 Tenafly 25.6%

2012Franklin

Lakes 25.9%

2011Franklin

Lakes 27.5%

2010Franklin

Lakes 24.2%

2009 Tenafly 17.8%

2008Franklin

Lakes 31.7%

2007 Tenafly 4.7%

2006 Tenafly 3.4%

Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%

10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%18.0%19.0%20.0%21.0%22.0%23.0%24.0%25.0%26.0%27.0%28.0%29.0%30.0%

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

TenaflyFranklinLakes

FranklinLakes

TenaflyFranklinLakes

MargateCity

FranklinLakes

201420132012201120102009200820072006

20.1%

23.1%

18.1%

26.1%

28.5%

21.6%

6.2%

9.3%

11.2%

Comparative DistrictGrade 3 First Place Math Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%

10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%18.0%19.0%20.0%21.0%22.0%23.0%24.0%25.0%26.0%27.0%28.0%29.0%30.0%31.0%32.0%33.0%

FranklinLakes

TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

TenaflyFranklinLakes

TenaflyTenafly

201420132012201120102009200820072006

24.0%24.4%

18.1%

32.8%

21.5%

18.8%

21.3%

11.5%

10.1%

Comparative DistrictGrade 4 First Place Math Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%

10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%18.0%19.0%20.0%21.0%22.0%23.0%24.0%25.0%26.0%27.0%28.0%29.0%30.0%31.0%32.0%

TenaflyTenaflyFranklinLakes

FranklinLakes

FranklinLakes

TenaflyFranklinLakes

TenaflyTenafly

201420132012201120102009200820072006

25.1%25.6%25.9%

27.5%

24.2%

17.8%

31.7%

4.7%

3.4%

Comparative DistrictGrade 5 First Place Math Percentage Rankings

2006-2014

NJASK Comparative District First-Place Math Score Changes by Percentage

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30

Comparison of Comparison District NJASK Math Score Changes

Franklin LakesJefferson Twp Margate City Paterson Tenafly Totowa Ventnor City

Comparative

Distr. Avg.

2014

Gr. 3 12.2% 11.5% 20.1% -15.2% 13.6% 6.6% -10.1% 4.4%

Gr. 4 24.0% 10.2% 11.2% -12.2% 17.1% 8.6% -17.2% 2.9%

Gr. 5 23.4% 24.0% 18.8% -10.3% 25.1% 6.3% 7.9% 11.9%

2013

Gr. 3 23.1% 6.6% 14.1% -17.9% 17.1% 10.1% -8.9% 3.5%

Gr. 4 16.4% 11.4% 22.4% -17.2% 24.4% 12.4% 0.4% 9.0%

Gr. 5 15.6% 17.6% 7.6% -14.0% 25.6% -0.4% 7.6% 7.4%

2012

Gr. 3 11.1% 9.1% 14.1% -23.9% 18.1% 2.1% -16.9% -7.4%

Gr. 4 27.8% 16.3% 16.8% -14.9% 32.8% 5.8% -8.2% 8.1%

Gr. 5 25.9% 18.4% 22.9% -8.1% 20.9% 14.9% 7.9% 12.8%

2011

Gr. 3 26.1% 18.4% 12.2% -23.8% 26.0% 3.6% -3.9% 5.4%

Gr. 4 21.5% 8.5% 15.7% -20.0% 21.5% 4.6% -16.2% 2.4%

Gr. 5 27.5% 18.5% 20.1% -18.4% 23.0% 5.2% 4.4% 8.8%

2010

Gr. 3 28.5% 19.2% 21.3% -15.9% 21.2% 6.2% -10.0% 7.0%

Gr. 4 16.7% 9.9% 13.1% -21.1% 18.8% 3.4% -8.2% 2.6%

Gr. 5 24.2% 19.2% 5.1% -31.5% 23.9% 4.3% 2.8% 4.0%

2009

Gr. 3 16.5% 13.6% 20.0% -29.9% 21.6% -2.1% 3.5% 4.4%

Gr. 4 21.3% 7.4% 9.9% -27.5% 11.6% -3.5% -9.7% -2.0%

Gr. 5 17.1% 3.9% 15.2% -33.4% 17.8% -16.4% -12.8% -4.3%

2008

Gr. 3 6.2% 3.5% 5.8% -33.8% 2.2% 1.2% -3.0% -4.0%

Gr. 4 8.3% 4.9% 4.1% -30.5% 11.5% -8.0% -11.7% -4.9%

Gr. 5 31.7% 25.0% 20.6% -16.8% 27.4% 1.1% -9.5% 8.0%

2007

Gr. 3 2.3% 4.5% 9.3% -29.0% 6.8% -6.0% -11.1% -4.3%

Gr. 4 13.8% 1.0% 8.3% -31.2% 13.8% -9.5% -14.5% -5.3%

Gr. 5 0.3% -3.6% -1.9% -38.9% 4.7% -16.5% -31.7% -14.6%

2006

Gr. 3 11.2% 0.9% 11.2% -27.6% 7.2% -4.5% -20.0% -5.5%

Gr. 4 5.5% -4.6% 2.3% -34.6% 10.1% -17.1% -14.2% -9.7%

Gr. 5 3.3% -3.4% -2.5% -47.3% 3.4% -12.2% -11.4% -12.2%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31

SAT

Math Scores

Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate

School District

SAT

Participation

School

District

SAT

Participation

School

District

SAT

Participation

Core Towns Atlantic City 54.6% Pequannock 94.8%

Bloomingdale Bloomingdale 78.7% Kinnelon 94.0%

Butler Butler 78.7% Tenafly 94.0%

Kinnelon 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Franklin Lakes 92.2%

Riverdale Jefferson Twp 80.3% Oakland 91.0%

Pompton Lks Kinnelon 94.0% Wayne Hills 88.7%

Oakland 91.0% Lincoln Park 74.6% Paterson 88.1%

Wanaque Margate City 68.4% Wayne Valley 84.4%

Ringwood Oakland 91.0% Ringwood 83.5%

West Milford 73.9% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque 83.5%

Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Jefferson Twp 80.3%

Pequannock 94.8% Pompton Lks 77.1% Bloomingdale 78.7%

Wayne Hills 88.7% Ringwood 83.5% Butler 78.7%

Wayne Valley 84.4% Riverdale 77.1% Pompton Lks 77.1%

Core Town

Neighbors Tenafly 94.0% Riverdale 77.1%

Jefferson Twp 80.3% Totowa 72.4% Lincoln Park 74.6%

Montville 89.6% Ventnor City West Milford 73.9%

Totowa 72.4% Wanaque 83.5% Totowa 72.4%

Big Cities Wayne Hills 88.7% Margate City 68.4%

Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Atlantic City 54.6%

Atlantic City 54.6% West Milford 73.9% Ventnor City 68.4%

AC HS Sending Districts

Margate City 54.6%

Ventnor City

Highest Scoring School in Study

Tenafly 94.0%

78.7%

77.1%

83.5%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32

Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate

School

District

SAT

Participation

Pequannock 94.8%

Kinnelon 94.0%

Tenafly 94.0%

Franklin Lakes 92.2%

Oakland 91.0%

Wayne Hills 88.7%

Paterson 88.1%

Wayne Valley 84.4%

Ringwood 83.5%

Wanaque 83.5%

Jefferson Twp 80.3%

Bloomingdale 78.7%

Butler 78.7%

Pompton Lks 77.1%

Riverdale 77.1%

Lincoln Park 74.6%

West Milford 73.9%

Totowa 72.4%

Margate City 68.4%

Atlantic City 54.6%

Ventnor City 68.4%

School District

SAT

Participation

Core Towns

Bloomingdale

Butler

Kinnelon 94.0%

Riverdale

Pompton Lks

Oakland 91.0%

Wanaque

Ringwood

West Milford 73.9%

Lincoln Park 74.6%

Pequannock 94.8%

Wayne Hills 88.7%

Wayne Valley 84.4%

Core Town

Neighbors

Jefferson Twp 80.3%

Montville 89.6%

Totowa 72.4%

Big Cities

Paterson 88.1%

Atlantic City 54.6%

AC HS Sending Districts

Margate City 54.6%

Ventnor City

Highest Scoring School in Study

Tenafly 94.0%

78.7%

77.1%

83.5%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

SAT Math Scores by School District 2006-2013

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 34

SAT Math Rankings by Year 2006-2011

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

1

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

2

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

3

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

4

Indian Hills

RHS

Indian Hills

RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

5

Ramapo

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Wayne

Valley H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Indian Hills

RHS

Indian Hills

RHS

Ramapo

H.S.

6

Kinnelon

H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Wayne

Valley

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Ramapo

H.S.

Wayne

Hills H.S.

7

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

Ramapo

H.S.

Indian Hills

RHS

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Wayne

Valley

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Wayne

Valley H.S.

8

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

9

Jefferson

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Lakeland

RHS

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Lakeland

RHS

10

West

Milford

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

Boonton

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

11

Passaic

Valley RHS

Pequannoc

k TWP RHS

West

Milford

H.S. Butler H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS Butler H.S. Butler H.S. Butler H.S.

12 Butler H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS Butler H.S.

West

Milford

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

13

Boonton

H.S.

Lakeland

RHS

Passaic

Valley RHS

Passaic

Valley RHS Butler H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Passaic

Valley RHS

14

Lakeland

RHS Butler H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

Passaic

Valley RHS

Boonton

H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

15

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

Atlantic

City H.S.

16 Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35

SAT Math Scores 2006-2013

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Butler H.S. 505 501 499 487 499 499 487 497

Kinnelon H.S. 567 564 575 557 559 579 532 543

Pompton Lks

H.S. 527 528 518 535 541 548 503 539

Indian Hills RHS 560 546 539 556 538 541 542 546

Lakeland RHS 520 515 521 520 513 516 493 492

West Milford

H.S. 509 503 500 512 496 504 501 514

Boonton H.S. 491 494 499 481 502 490 516 497

Pequannock

TWP HS 573 536 539 546 517 513 500 539

Wayne Hills H.S. 555 566 569 568 565 569 549 566Wayne Valley

H.S. 555 550 536 554 559 553 556 555

Jefferson H.S. 505 500 494 502 494 515 503 523

Passaic Valley

RHS 501 496 489 503 496 496 494 502

Ramapo H.S. 559 546 561 566 570 541 542 546

Paterson 340 377 395 408 398 398 404 410

Atlantic City

H.S. 461 450 449 447 441 468 454 444

Tenafly H.S. 652 632 636 640 630 623 619 620

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36

SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013

Butler H.S.

Kinnelon

H.S.

Pompton

Lks H.S.

Indian

Hills RHS

Lakeland

RHS

West

Milford

H.S.

Boonton

H.S.

Pequanno

ck TWP

RHS

Wayne

Hills

H.S.

Wayne

Valley

H.S.

Jefferson

H.S.

Passaic

Valley

RHS

Ramapo

H.S. Paterson

Atlantic

City H.S.

Tenafly

H.S.

SAT NJ

Ranking

2011 143 37 121 60 97 156 201 77 50 91 179 208 43 274 266 5

2013 505 567 527 560 520 509 491 573 555 555 505 501 559 340 461 652

2012 501 564 528 546 515 503 494 536 566 550 500 496 546 377 450 632

2011 499 575 518 539 521 500 499 539 569 536 494 489 561 395 449 636

2010 487 557 535 556 520 512 481 546 568 554 502 503 566 408 447 640

2009 499 559 541 538 513 496 502 517 565 559 494 496 570 398 441 630

2008 499 579 548 541 516 504 490 513 569 553 515 496 541 398 468 623

2007 487 532 503 542 493 501 516 500 549 556 503 494 542 404 454 619

2006 497 543 539 546 492 514 497 539 566 555 523 502 546 410 444 620

SAT

Participatio

n Rate 78.7% 94.0% 77.1% 91.0% 83.5% 73.9% 74.6% 94.8% 88.7% 84.0% 80.3% 72.4% 92.2% 88.1% 94.0%

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 37

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Valley H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Pequannock TWP RHS

Lakeland RHS

Boonton H.S.

Butler H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Jefferson H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

630

570

565

559

559

541

538

517

513

502

499

496

496

494

441

398

SAT Math Scores - 2009

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Wayne Valley H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Pequannock TWP RHS

Passaic Valley RHS

Lakeland RHS

Butler H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

619

556

549

542

542

532

516

503

503

501

500

494

493

487

454

404

SAT Math Scores - 2007

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Wayne Valley

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Pequannock TWP RHS

Jefferson H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Butler H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

620

566

555

546

546

543

539

539

523

514

502

497

497

492

444

410

SAT Math Scores - 2006

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Wayne Valley H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Jefferson H.S.

Pequannock TWP RHS

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

623

579

569

553

548

541

541

516

515

513

504

499

496

490

468

398

SAT Math Scores - 2008

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Pequannock TWP RHS

Kinnelon H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Wayne Valley H.S.

Pompton Lks H.S.

Lakeland RHS

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

652

573

567

560

559

555

555

527

520

509

505

505

501

491

461

340

SAT Math Scores - 2013

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Valley H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Ramapo H.S.

Pequannock TWP RHS

Pompton Lks H.S.

Lakeland RHS

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

632

566

564

550

546

546

536

528

515

503

501

500

496

494

450

377

SAT Math Scores - 2012

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Pequannock TWP RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Lakeland RHS

Pompton Lks H.S.

West Milford H.S.

Butler H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Jefferson H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

636

575

569

561

539

539

536

521

518

500

499

499

494

489

449

395

SAT Math Scores - 2011

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Tenafly H.S.

Wayne Hills H.S.

Ramapo H.S.

Kinnelon H.S.

Indian Hills RHS

Wayne Valley H.S.

Pequannock TWP RHS

Pompton Lks H.S.

Lakeland RHS

West Milford H.S.

Passaic Valley RHS

Jefferson H.S.

Butler H.S.

Boonton H.S.

Atlantic City H.S.

Paterson

640

568

566

557

556

554

546

535

520

512

503

502

487

481

447

408

SAT Math Scores - 2010

SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013

Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 38