50
National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training For Food Defense Preparedness, Response & Recovery Date Presenter s

National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

  • Upload
    mili

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training. For Food Defense Preparedness, Response & Recovery. Date Presenters. Risk Communication Team. Risk Communicator Training Modules. Module 1 An Introduction to Risk Communication Module 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

National Center for Food Protection & Defense

Risk CommunicatorTraining

For Food Defense Preparedness,

Response & Recovery

DatePresenters

Page 3: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

3

Module 1

An Introduction to Risk CommunicationAn Introduction to Risk Communication Module 2

Food Defense & the Psychology of Food Defense & the Psychology of TerrorismTerrorism

Module 3

Message Development & DeliveryMessage Development & Delivery Module 4

Risk Communication Preparedness & Risk Communication Preparedness & Planning Planning

Module 5

Media Relations & PracticeMedia Relations & Practice

Risk Communicator Risk Communicator Training ModulesTraining Modules

Page 4: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

4

Page 5: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

Module One

An An Introduction Introduction

to Risk to Risk CommunicatioCommunicatio

nn

National Center for Food Protection & Defense

Risk Communicator Training

Page 6: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

6

topic one

Defining Risk Communication: What It IS & What It Isn’t

topic two

Risk Perception: Facts & Feelingstopic three

We’re All Risk Communicators: It Is Your Job!

An Introduction to Risk An Introduction to Risk CommunicationCommunication

Page 7: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

7

Module OneLearner OutcomesLearner Outcomes

Apply the risk communication goals to a foodborne outbreak.

Describe the function of risk communication within the risk management model.

Identify the factors that drive perceptions of risk. Compare and contrast communicator roles from

various segments of the food system.

Page 8: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

module one

An Introduction toAn Introduction to

Risk CommunicationRisk Communication

topic one

Defining Risk Defining Risk Communication:Communication:

What It Is & What It What It Is & What It Isn’tIsn’t

Page 9: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

9

Risk communication Risk communication defineddefined

An open, two-way exchange of information and opinion about risk leading to better understanding and better risk management decisions.

Source: USDA, 1992

Page 10: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

10

Risk communication Risk communication goalsgoals

Tailor communication so it takes into account the emotional response to an event.

Empowers audience to make informed decision-making.

Prevent negative behavior and/or encourage constructive responses to crisis or danger.

Page 11: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

CDC officialSeasonal flu vaccinationSeptember, 2006

"The best way to guard against the flu is to get vaccinated, which helps to protect you, your loved ones, and your community."

Page 12: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

State emergency response spokespersonPandemic preparednessOctober, 2006

“We are very concerned for those who became ill and our thoughts are with them as we continue to work closely with health officials as they try to determine the root cause of this. While the authorities do not know the source of this contamination, they have said there haven't been any new cases since Nov 29, so they are confident that it is most likely no longer a threat."

Page 13: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

University Food Studies & Public Health SpecialistE. coli – spinach outbreakSeptember, 2006

… “The idea that salad greens have become a source of E. coli is very shocking, and it means we have a real problem in the food system. This is very serious."

Page 14: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

CDC spokespersonRe: Listeriosis - hot dogs outbreakDecember, 1998

“We have not with certainty traced the illness to any specific product or source. But people in high-risk groups for developing listeriosis, particularly pregnant women, the elderly and persons with compromised immune systems should take precautions.”

Page 15: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

County DietitianFollowing E.coli – spinach outbreak, October, 2006

“…Spinach is high in antioxidants, which can protect against heart disease and cancer. If you’re having a hard time finding spinach, there are lots of other greens with nutritional value. We should not forget about mustard greens, bok choy, kale and chard, broccoli and Brussel sprouts. I would suggest things like romaine lettuce and arugula.”

Page 16: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

Industry association spokespersonE. coli – spinach outbreakSeptember, 2006

…Concerning restoring public trust following the outbreak:

"Farmers approach it as the most serious concern that they have. The most important commodity that we have is the public trust."

Page 17: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

17

Communication Communication modelsmodels

Basic Communication Model Uni-directional or we tell “them” approach Who says - what - when - to whom - through

what channel - with what effect

Risk Communication Model Multi-directional Actively involves the audience as an

information source

Page 18: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

18

Risk Communication Risk Communication elementselements

Multi-directional & actively involves the audience as an information source

Logistics Metamessaging Listening Self-assessment Evaluation

Audience assessment

Audience involvement

Message

Page 19: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

19

Risk communication Risk communication outcomesoutcomes

Decrease illness, injury & deaths Build support for response plan Assist in executing response plan Prevent misallocation & wasting of resources Keep decision-makers well informed Counter or correct rumors Foster informed decision-making concerning

risk

Page 20: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

20

Contributing Contributing disciplinesdisciplines

Environmental Science

Social Psychology Philosophy Political Science

Communication Chemistry Public Health Epidemiology

Risk Communication is trans-disciplinary:

Love Canal (’78) & Three Mile Island (’79)

Page 21: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

21

Crisis Response

Spontaneous Post-event Uni-directional Reactive Equivocal

Risk & crisis Risk & crisis communicationcommunication

Preparedness & Recovery

Planned, tested, strategic Pre-event activities Multi-directional Proactive Certain

Page 22: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

22

Applying the conceptsApplying the concepts

Unpacking Unpacking thethe

MessageMessage

Page 23: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

23

SummarySummaryWhat Risk Communication is NOT:

Spin Public relations Damage control Crisis management How to write a press release How to give a media interview Always intended to make people “feel better” or

reduce their fear

Page 24: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

24

SummarySummary

Considers human perceptions of risk Multi-directional communication among

communicators, publics and stakeholders Activities before, during and after an event An integral part of an emergency response plan Empowers people to make their own informed

decisions

And what Risk Communication IS:

Page 25: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

module one

An Introduction toAn Introduction to

Risk CommunicationRisk Communication

topic two

Risk Perception:Risk Perception:Facts & FeelingsFacts & Feelings

Page 26: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

26

Risk analysis Risk analysis paradigmparadigm

Everything we do involves risk

Zero risk is unachievable

Options exist for managing every risk

Page 27: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

27

Risk managementRisk managementAll potentially effected parties are engaged in:

HazardIdentification

RiskAssessment

RiskCommunication

RISK MANAGEMENT

Page 28: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

28

Interpreting Interpreting riskrisk

Communicating about risk is difficult because of the way people interpret risk

Involves competing perspectives: objective vs subjective

Page 29: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

29

Developed by a leading research university

• Experience short term memory boost• Enjoy pleasant feelings in times of stress

Page 30: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

30

• Developed by a leading research university

• 16 years in the making

• Provides short term memory boost & pleasant feeling in times of stress 24-36 hours in duration

• Multiple trials examining potential short term & long term side effects

Page 31: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

31

What shapes What shapes perceptions of riskperceptions of risk

Hazard – something that can go wrong

Probability – likelihood of it happening

Consequences – implications of hazard

Value – subjective evaluation of the relative importance of what might be lost

Page 32: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

32

What shapes What shapes perceptions of riskperceptions of risk

Hazard – something that can go wrong

Probability – likelihood of it happening

Consequences – implications of hazard

Value – subjective evaluation of the relative importance of what might be lost FEELING

THINKING

Page 33: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

33

Scientist - Consumer Scientist - Consumer disconnectdisconnect

SCIENTISTEXPERTknowsthinks

CONSUMER PUBLIC

feelsbelieves

Fact-based:hazard, probability

Value-based:consequences, value

Page 34: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

risk comm clipping file

"In fact, probably getting out of your automobile and walking into the store to buy beef, has a higher probability than you'll be hit by an automobile than ... the probability of any harm coming to you from eating beef."

U.S. Agriculture Undersecretary Japanese import ban on U.S. beefJanuary, 2006

Page 35: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

35

With permission from the Star Tribune

Scientists focus on danger - consumers on the ‘whole cow’

Mad Cow, 2003

Page 36: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

36

Peter Sandman

“The risks that upset people are completely different than the

risks that kill people.”

Page 37: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training
Page 38: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

38

Perceptions of riskPerceptions of risk

Risk = Risk = Hazard + OutrageHazard + Outrage

SOURCE: Peter Sandman

Page 39: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

39

A variety of risk comm approaches

Hazard (danger)

High

Low High

Outrage Management

Crisis /Emergency

Communication

Public Relations

PrecautionAdvocacy

Outrage(fear, anger)

Page 40: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

40

Goal: Reduce outrage so people don’t take unnecessary precautions

Hazard (danger)

High

Low High

Crisis /Emergency

Communication

Public Relations

PrecautionAdvocacy

OutrageManagement

Outrage(fear,anger)

Page 41: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

41

Goal: Increase concern for a real hazard to motivate preventive action

Hazard (danger)

High

Low High

Outrage Management

Crisis /Emergency

Communication

Public Relations

PrecautionAdvocacy

Outrage(fear,anger)

Page 42: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

42

Hazard (danger)

High

Outrage(fear,anger)

Low High

Outrage Management

Public Relations

PrecautionAdvocacy

Crisis /Emergency

Communication

Goal: Acknowledge hazard, validate concern, give people ways to act

Page 43: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

43

Applying the conceptsApplying the concepts

Hazard +Outrageand Your

Organization

Page 44: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

module one

An Introduction toAn Introduction to

Risk CommunicationRisk Communication

topic three

We’re All Risk We’re All Risk Communicators:Communicators:

It IS Your Job!It IS Your Job!

Page 45: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

45

Prevailing modelPrevailing model

Risk communication is centralized in PIO or spokesperson functions

Industry CEO Organization or agency head Communications director Other “official spokespersons”

Page 46: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

46

Food system risk Food system risk communicatorscommunicators

Official spokespersons Industry CEO, food agency director,

labor union officer, consumer organization head

Communication staff members Public information officers, technical

writers, web managers

Subject matter experts Scientists, food system experts,

terrorism experts, quality assurance officers

FEMA

Page 47: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

47

Food system risk Food system risk communicatorscommunicators

Educators & outreach specialists Extension staff, consumer educators,

outreach workers, public health educators, consumer hotline staff

Public health & health care specialists

Agency directors, food inspectors, physicians, nurses, lab specialists, sanitarians

Page 48: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

48

Alternative model: Alternative model:

We’re ALL risk We’re ALL risk communicatorscommunicators

Including informal channels & networks

Neighbor to neighbor Rumor mill Online blogs “Person on the street” interviews Talk radio Others???

CSREES

Page 49: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

49

Case Study:Case Study:Schwan’s salmonella Schwan’s salmonella

outbreak, 1994outbreak, 1994 Company features home delivered food products Est. 224,000 persons were exposed to ice

cream contaminated with salmonella Contamination traced to tanker trucks that

hauled ice cream premix Interaction between Schwan’s door-to-door

delivery drivers & customers was key recovery and restoring trust

Page 50: National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

50

for EffectiveMessage Development

• Risk & crisis communication is an ongoing process

For EffectiveRisk Communication

BestBest

Practices

Practices