National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    1/21

    NationalStatusofLFR

    Development:USA

    CraigF.Smith

    NavalPostgraduateSchool,USA

    Seminar:ActivitiesforLeadcooledFastReactors(LFR)inGenerationIVInternationalForum(GIF)

    Tokyo

    Institute

    of

    Technology

    November9th,2012

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    2/21

    Historicalbackdrop:LMFRs

    Closingcomments

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    3/21

    USFastReactors:

    ARich

    Historical

    Context

    emen ne: e rs as reac or, u y n . u ue e ,mercurycooled,25Wtpower.

    EBR1:

    the

    first

    reactor

    to

    generate

    electrical

    power,

    built

    in

    1949

    a a o a s. a coo e , . , ecomm ss one n .Firstbreederreactor.

    Fermi1:94MWeFBRprototype,builtnearDetroitin1957,

    operate

    unt

    .

    o um

    coo e . LAMPRE:1 MWt FRbasedonmoltenPu fuel,sodiumcooling,andreflectorcontrol,builtatLANLinthe195761timeframe.

    EBRII:sodiumcooled62MWt reactor,builtinIdahoastheIFRprototypein1965;operatedfor30years.

    SEFOR:Ex erimental

    test

    reactor

    o erated

    from

    1969

    to

    1972

    in

    Arkansas.MOXfueled,Nacooled,20MWt.

    FFTF:Builtin1978inWashingtonState,400MWt Nacooledtestreactor.

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    4/21

    Clementine

    1946

    EBR1

    1951

    Fermi1

    EBR2

    1965

    SEFOR

    1972

    FFTF

    1978

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    5/21

    ofliquidmetalcoolants

    Coolant Melting Boiling Chemical

    ( C)

    ( C) (w/Air and Water)

    Lead-Bismuth 125 1670 Inert

    (Pb-Bi, LBE)

    Lead (Pb) 327 1737 Inert

    Sodium (Na) 98 883 Highly reactive

    LeadandLBECoolantsProvidePromisingOverallCharacteristics

    5

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    6/21

    Goals achievable

    oal Areas v a n r ns c coo an proper es p usEngineering

    Sustainability

    Transmutation of MA

    Sim licit

    Economics

    Compactness

    Primary system at atmospheric pressure

    Safety and Reliability No risk of re-criticality in case of core melt(to be confirmed by severe accident analysis)

    Chemical inertness/high margin to boiling

    Proliferation

    Resistance and

    Use of fuel containing MA

    Use of non-reactive coolantys ca ro ec on Sealed core and/or long refueling cycle

    6

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    7/21

    LFRActivitiesintheUS

    LFRactivitiesintheUShave

    pastfewyears

    Continuing(thoughmainly

    Workat

    US

    national

    laboratories

    Universityefforts

    Some

    US

    industrial

    efforts asa re erence

    conceptforasmall,

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    8/21

    Reactor (SSTAR)

    CLOSURE HEA D

    CONTROLRODDRIVES

    SSTAR is a small natural

    circulation fast reactor of 20

    CO 2 INLET NOZZLE

    (1 OF 4)

    (1 OF 8)

    - -

    CONTROL

    ROD GUIDE

    TUBES ANDDRIVELINES

    THERMAL

    MWe/45 MWt, that can be

    scaled up to 180 MWe/400

    MWt.

    EXCHA NGER (1 OF 4 )

    FLOW SHROUDGUARDVESSEL

    The compact active core is

    removed by the supplier as a

    ACTIVE CORE ANDFISSION GAS PLENUM

    RADIAL REFLECTOR

    FLOW DISTRIBUTOR

    REACTORVESSEL

    s ng e casse e an rep ace y

    a fresh core.

    Key technical attributes include the use of lead (Pb) as coolant and along-life sealed core in a small, modular system.

    8

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    9/21

    Coolant Lead

    Fuel Transuranic Nitride,

    Peak FuelTemperature, C

    841

    nr c e n 15

    Enrichment, % 5 Radial Zones,TRU/HM 1.7/3.5/

    Peak CladdingTemperature, C

    650

    Fuel Pin Diameter, 2.50. . .

    Core Lifetime,years

    15-30

    m

    Fuel/Coolant VolumeFractions

    0.45/0.35

    Core Inlet/OutletTemperature, C

    420/567

    Coolant circulation Natural convection

    Active CoreDimensions,

    Height/Diameter, m

    0.976/1.22

    Average (Peak)Discharge Burnup,

    81(131)Power conversion S-CO2

    Brayton cycle

    9

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    10/21

    intheUS

    Effortsat

    US

    national

    labs

    Generation IV Nuclear Energy SystemsSystem Research Plan

    LLNLsupporttoDOEs

    AdvancedReactorprogram

    for the Lead-cooled Fast Reactor

    Pre arin Toda for Tomorrows Ener Needs

    theSUPERSTAR

    concept,

    an

    extensionoftheSSTAR

    concept

    LANL

    work

    with

    MIT

    and

    wit UCBer e eyonmateria

    testingandperformance.

    Issued by the

    Generation IV International Forum

    LFR Preliminary System Steering Committee

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    11/21

    n vers ye o r s

    MIT

    work

    on

    FunctionallyGraded

    Com ositematerials

    UC

    Berkeley

    material

    2m3m

    Schematic vertical cut through the ENHS reactor

    work30m

    27m

    8m

    3m

    2m

    Number of Stacks = 4

    Cross Section of Stack

    Seismic isolators

    opera on

    o

    an

    LBEloop3.64m (O.D; t=0.05)

    17.6

    25m

    ENHS module

    Reactor pool

    Steam generators6.94m (I.D.)

    Underground silo

    Reactor Vessel Air

    Cooling System (RVACS)

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    12/21

    ome m e n us r a e o r s n e

    Hyperion

    Power

    Group

    (HPG)

    (now

    Gen4Energy)

    lakeChime PPRS

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    13/21

    GenIVInternationalForum(GIF):Current

    Statuswith

    regard

    to

    LFR

    re m nary ys em eer ng omm ee p was orme n

    2005 MembersincludedEU US Ja anandKorea

    PreparedinitialdraftLFRSystemResearchPlan(LFRSRP)

    Systemsincludedalargecentralstationdesign(ELSY)andasmall

    In2010,

    an

    MOU

    was

    signed

    between

    EU

    and

    Japan

    causing

    a

    reformulationofthepSSC

    In2011,theRussianFederationaddeditssignaturetotheMOU

    InApril,2012,thereformulatedpSSC metinPisaandbegunthe

    processo rev s ng e

    ThenewpSSC envisionsvariousupdatestothecentralstation

    300)as

    a

    new

    thrust

    in

    the

    SRP

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    14/21

    InspiteofarichhistoryinLMFRdevelopment,

    currentUS

    efforts

    related

    to

    LFR

    are

    limited

    Nevertheless,thereiscontinuinginterestin

    ,

    theSFR

    Asmallbutdedicatedgroupofresearchersare

    continuin to maintain o tions throu h

    nationallab,universityandindustryprojects.

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    15/21

    BACKUPSLIDES

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    16/21

    MITWorkonFunctionallyGraded

    Composites(FGC)

    O jective: esignan pro uce ue c a ingan coo antpiping orHLM

    cooled(Pb/LBE)fastreactorsusingcommercialpractices.

    TheFGC

    consists

    of

    a

    structural

    layer

    of

    a

    9Cr

    1Mo

    steel

    (T/F91)

    and

    a

    corrosionresistantprotectivelayerofanewalloywithacompositionof

    Fe12Cr2Si.

    ExtendsO eratin Tem eratureto700CandFlowVelocit to

    6m/sec

    Theprojectproceededtothepointof

    (TREX)productforbothODandID

    cladmaterial.

    developmentandfurtherdevelop

    thepropertiesdatabase.

    16

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    17/21

    The FGC protects against LBE corrosion in all expected environments, oxidizing or

    reducing, such that corrosion is no longer a concern for Pb/LBE-cooled systems.

    Extrapolated corrosion rates based on the experiments are less than 1 m/yr , which is

    negligible for structural components, assuming a 60 year reactor lifetime.

    The FGC is diffusionally stable. The diffusional dilution zone between the two layers will

    not exceed 17 mm for fuel cladding (three year life) or 33 mm for coolant piping (sixty

    year e , o assume o opera e a .

    Because of these performance gains, the FGC represents an enabling technology for

    Pb/LBE-cooled reactors and systems. A steady-state temperature increase of up to 150C

    ,

    materials exist.

    The FGC is ready for immediate deployment in non-irradiated or low-dose applications.

    The corrosion resistance has been demonstrated, and will be verified endin lon erlength experiments.

    17

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    18/21

    UCBerkeleycontinueswithother

    mater a san

    es gn

    wor

    UseoftheICE2ex erimentalstationtoinvesti atetheeffectsof

    irradiationoncladdingsteelcorrosioninhightemperature

    chemistrycontrolled

    heavy

    liquid

    metal

    environment

    (collaborationwithLANL)

    TestingHT9steelinLBEatLANLsIonBeamMaterialsLab(IBML)

    ~

    5wt%oxygen).

    o Testedsensorequipmentunderirradiationconditions.

    o PIEtobecarriedoutatUCBerkeleyduring 2012.

    Testing

    commercial

    oxygen

    sensors

    in

    HLM Comp ete mec anica testingo oxi e ayersto eterminet e

    fracturestressneededtospallofftheoxidelayer

    andburn

    (B&B)

    core

    concepts.

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    19/21

    -promoting its HPM system

    Power 70MWt, 25MWe

    Lifetime 8 10 ears

    Size (m) 1.5w x 2.5h

    Weight (T) Less than 50

    Coolant PbBi

    Fuel uranium nitrideEnrichment

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    20/21

    TheSTARENHS(EncapsulatedNuclearHeatSource)

    3yearNERIstudywithUCB,ANL,

    CRIEPIcompletedinFY02

    Evolutionaryconcept

    developed

    fromCRIEPIToshiba4Sreactor

    Naturalcirculationcooling

    Reactorcore

    heat

    transferred

    from

    primarytosecondaryPbBithrough

    capsu ewa

    Fuelcontainedincapsule

    Engineeringfeasibility

    demonstratedbuteconomic

    feasibilityisuncertain

  • 7/30/2019 National Status on LFR Development in USA - Smith

    21/21

    Lakechime PPRS is pursuing concepts

    described as Evolutionary SSTAR

    E-SSTAR

    Evolutionary SSTAR variation intended toemphasize early deployment; currently at

    proposal stage. Features may include:

    Forced cooling Oxide fuel

    Steam cycle power conversion

    Small reactor

    21