Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
February 8, 2011
New Contingency Plan
Takeo Office of River, Kyushu Regional Bureau, MLIT
JICA Training
Copyright (C) 2011 Takeo Office of River, MLIT. All Rights Reserved. This article was translated by JICA
Altitude1,800 m (T.P)1,000 m
150 m
14 m8-14 m5-8 m3-5 m1-3 m0 (to −1 m)Sea
•• Area at sea levelArea at sea level
(1) Saga Plain is an extensive area of low flatland
(1) Saga Plain is an extensive area of low flatland
(1) Saga Plain is an extensive area of low flatland
Coastline at the beginning of the alluvial period
Coastline about 2,000 years ago
Coastline around 800 AD
Coastline around 1600 AD
Present coastline
Around the 6th century
Rec
lam
atio
n w
orks
Ariake Sea
Rokkaku River
Ushizu RiverSaga City
Figure 1-2(3): Changes in the coastline of the Saga Plain (Shiroishi District)
About 60% of the basin is an inland water area.
(2) The mountain area is smaller than the plain area
Rokkaku River
Ushizu River
Takeo River
Ariake Sea
Haruke River
Rokkaku River
Imade River
Ishihara River
Ushizu River
Myokenbashi
Suminoebashi
Shiomibashi
(3) The rivers meander due to the low flatland (Meandering river)
The tidal range of the Ariake Sea reaches is up to about 6 m. Seawater therefore flows to the upstream section of the rivers at high tide. The hinterland is a low flatland that is 0-3 m above sea level since the tidal mudflats have been converted to land or reclaimed by people. As a result, it is difficult to use the river water.
(4) Ariake Sea has the greatest tidal range in Japan
High tide
Ariake Sea
Saga Plain
Tidal mud flatsLow tide
At low tideAt high tide
(4) Ariake Sea has the greatest tidal range in Japan
Leading the slow and meandering rivers whose the tidal range is up to about 29 km in Japan
Basin area: 341 km2
Main course length: 47 kmPopulation in the basin: About 120,000 peopleExpected flood area: About 201 km2
Population in the expected flood area: About 110,000 people
(4) Ariake Sea has the greatest tidal range in Japan
Legend Basin boundary
Railroad
Highway
Route 34Section under direct control
Expected flood area
Municipal boundaryExisting retarding pond
JR Karatsu Line Sefuri-Ten
Mountain System
Nagasaki Expressway
Mt. Ten (1,046 m high)
Mt. Hachiman (764 m high) Taku City
Mutabe Retarding Pond
Ogi City
Route 34
JR Nagasaki Line
Rokkaku Estuary
Weir
Takeo City
Omachi Town
JR Sasebo Line
Mt. Jinroku (447 m high)
Nishikyushu Expressway
Dainichi Weir
Shiroishi Town
Kohoku Town
Ariake Sea
When a flood has occurred, . . .
August 1980(Takeo City)
Flooding in July 1990
Rokkaku River
Takeo River
Taka
hash
i Riv
er
Route 498
Route 34
Takeo-Taku Line (main local road)
Submerged road
Flooding in July 1990
Submerged Route 34 (Asahi Town, Takeo City)
Flooded Asahi Town, Takeo City
Flood on July 26, 2009
Present Flood Control
(1) Letting floodwater flow safelyConstruction of embankments
(2) Controlling floodwaterDams and retarding ponds
(3) Discharging inland waterDrainage pumps
Bank
Ariake clay layer
Gravel layer
Since the start of the modification of rivers under direct control in 1958, embankments and river channels have been constructed and modified weirs installed to improve the flow-down capability. When constructing embankments, the ultra-soft ground was improved by means of slow banking work.
Improving structure
Improving structure
Image of soft ground improvement
Ultra-soft ground improvement[DJM method]
Kyuragi DamLocation of the Matsuura River System
Matsuura River System
Fukuoka
Saga
Oita
Nagasaki Kumamoto
Miyazaki
Kagoshima
下筌ダム(小国町、中津江村) 松原ダム(大山町、天瀬町)
Flood on July 26, 2009 Flood on July 26, 2009
Right bank of the midstream section of the Ushizu River (15 k100 to 16 k400)[Facility scale] Design scale: 1/100 (Target: Myoken Bridge) Flood control rate: 100 m3/s
Pond area: 53.4 ha Storage: 900,000 m3
Mutabe Retarding Pond
Imade River
Ushizu River
Mutabe Retarding Pond
Overflow levee Drainage
pump station
Arrangement of the Drainage Pump StationsDrainage pump station (MLIT)Drainage pump station (MAFF)Drainage pump station (local government)
Legend
About 350 m3/sAbout 130 m3/s
About 220 m3/s
Total
Ushizu River
Rokkaku River
Takeo City
Taku City
Kohoku Town
Mutabe Retarding
Pond
Myoken Bridge
JR Karatsu Line
Ogi City
Route 203
Ushizu River
Omachi Town
Takahashi DPS
JR Sasebo LineTakeo River
Shiroishi Town
Shiomi Bridge
Ureshino City
Rokkaku
River
Rokkaku Estuary
Weir
Suminoe Bridge
JR N
agas
aki L
ine
Rout
e 20
7
Route 444
Takahashi Drainage Pump Station
Takahashi DPS
Takeo River
Takahashi River
Location: Left side of the Rokkaku River (0/800), Takahashi, Asahi-cho, Takeo-shi, Saga
Completion: March 1997
Design discharge: 50 m3/s (3 pumps, each rated at 16.7 m3/s)
Limits of Disaster Prevention that Relies on Facilities
0
100
200
300
500
400
10
5
(times/ year)
(times/ year)
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
1. Frequency of rains whose hourly precipitation is 50 mm or more
2. Frequency of rains whose hourly precipitation is 100 mm or more
Annual number of hourly rainfall (at about 1,300 AMeDAS points throughout the
country)
2.52.5 times in avg.times in avg.
1988-19971.91.9 times in avgtimes in avg
1978-1987
206206 times in avg.times in avg.
1978-1987
4.84.8 times in avg.times in avg.
1998-2007
318318 times in avg.times in avg.
1998-2007
233233 times in avg.times in avg.
1988-1997
Source: Japan Meteorological Agency
Recent Rise in the Frequency of Torrential Rain
0 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
• It is difficult to completely prevent disasters• Avoiding devastating damage• Minimizing damage to the greatest possible
extentDisaster prevention reliance is based on
physical aspects (hard)
Disaster reduction is based on non-physical resources (soft)
Change in Approach from Disaster Prevention to Disaster Reduction
Plan 1:Plan 1:Making towns in consideration of risk managementPlan 2:Plan 2:
Using new information about disaster prevention
New Contingency PlanNew Contingency PlanNew Contingency Plan
Resident’s sheltering
action
Local flood prevention activities
Government’s information
service
SelfSelf--helphelp
Mutual aidMutual aid Public Public supportsupport
Improving the disaster prevention capabilities of local areas should start
with a review of the relationship between the government and residents.
Thank you for your attention.
Copyright (C) 2011 Takeo Office of River, MLIT. All Rights Reserved. This article was translated by JICA