8
New Genetic Abnormalities and Treatment Response in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia  Jules P.P. Meijerink, Monique L. den Boer, and Rob Pieters Numerous genetic abnormalities have been identied in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Here  we review the recurrent abnormalities with emphasis on those recently discovered, and discuss their association with chemotherapy resistance or sensitivity and with clinical response to therapy.  Also, the role of genetic abnormalities in leukemogenesis and their potential as therapeutic targets  will be discussed. Semin Hematol 46:16–23 © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. B-CELL ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA I n general, children with B-lineage acute lympho- blastic leukemia (ALL) have a more favorable clini- cal outcome tha n those suf fer ing from T-lineage  ALL. B-lineage ALL forms a heterogeneous group and harbors many underlying genetic lesions with variable treatment responses ( Table 1  ). Genotypes Currently Used for Risk-Adapted Stratication of Pediatric Precursor B-ALL The two main genetic subtypes  TEL-AML1–positive and hyperdiploidy with greater than 50 chromosomes togethe r account for 50% of prec ursor B-ALL cases. Both are associated with a favora ble outcome, having a 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of greater than 85%. 1 This favorable prognosis is most likely due to relative sensitivity of  TEL-AML1  precursor B ALL to  L-asparagi- nase,whereas hyperdiploid cases respond well to  L-as- paraginase and antimetabolites like 6-mercaptopurine and methotr exate. 2,3  Within the  TEL-AML1–positive subtype, prognosis is impaired in approximately 10% of the cases bearing two copies of the  TEL-AML1–translo- cated gene, due to the high frequency of early relapses and increased resistance to prednisolone. 4 The unfavorable genetic subtypes  BCR-ABL1–posi- tive ALL and MLL-rearranged ALL each account for less than 5% of children with ALL who are older than 1 year of age. In contrast, the portion of  MLL-rearr anged ALL is greater than 80% in infants up to 12 months of age. 5 The dismal prognosis has been linked to resistance to  various drugs,  L-aspa raginase for  BCR-ABL1–positive  ALL and glucocorticoids and  L-aspar aginase for  MLL- rearranged ALL. 6,7 Investi gations have shown that well- known resistance mechanisms found in (solid) cancers, such as abnormalities in drug efux systems (P-glycop- rotein, multidrug resist ance–associated protein, and others), detoxifying systems (glutathione-linked), apo- ptosis pathways, amino acid metabolism, and glucocor- ticoid receptor signaling are not the main explana tions for drug resistance in pediatric ALL. 8,9 In contrast, ge- nome-wide technologies have revealed new insigh ts as to the causes of resistance in pediatric ALL, and as a consequence have opened a new era of potential resis- tance modifying agents, such as reversing glucocorti- coid resistance by glycolysis inhibitors. 10-12 The above -mentioned genet ic abnor mali ties are mutually exclusive, although incidentally combina- tions have been reported, such as hyperdiploidy and TEL-AML1–positivity. These genotypes (with the ex- ception of hyperdiploidy) result in fusion genes that affect the self-renewal and differentiation capacity of hema topoi etic cell s. Drugs that speci cal ly target fusion gene products and/or associated pathways are be- ing developed and tested in clinical trials. Small-inhibitory mole cule s such as imat inib (Gle evec/ Gliv ec, Novartis) and dasatinib (Bristol-Myers Squibb) have relative speci- city towards activated tyrosine kinases and may there- fore effectively kill cells that have abnormalities in these genes, as in  BCR-ABL1–positi ve ALL. 13,14 New Recurr ent Geneti c Abnormalities in Precursor B-ALL The currently known genotypes used to stratify pa- tie nts in risk-a dapt ed trea tment reg ime ns only com- prise about 60% of precursor B-ALL cases. The genetic Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam–Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Address correspondence to Rob Pieters, MD, PhD, Department of Pedi- atric Onco logy /Hema tolog y, Erasmu s Medic al Cente r Rotte rdamSophia Children’s Hospital, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015GJ Rotter- dam, The Netherlands. E-mail:  [email protected] 0037-1963/09/$ - see front matter © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.09.006 Seminars in Hematology,  Vol 46, No 1, January 2009, pp 16–23 16

New Genetic Abnormalities

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 1/8

New Genetic Abnormalities and TreatmentResponse in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

 Jules P.P. Meijerink, Monique L. den Boer, and Rob Pieters 

Numerous genetic abnormalities have been identified in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Here we review the recurrent abnormalities with emphasis on those recently discovered, and discusstheir association with chemotherapy resistance or sensitivity and with clinical response to therapy.

 Also, the role of genetic abnormalities in leukemogenesis and their potential as therapeutic targets will be discussed.Semin Hematol 46:16–23 © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

B-CELL ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

In general, children with B-lineage acute lympho-blastic leukemia (ALL) have a more favorable clini-cal outcome than those suffering from T-lineage

 ALL. B-lineage ALL forms a heterogeneous group andharbors many underlying genetic lesions with variabletreatment responses ( Table 1 ).

Genotypes Currently Used for Risk-AdaptedStratification of Pediatric Precursor B-ALL

The two main genetic subtypes TEL-AML1–positiveand hyperdiploidy with greater than 50 chromosomestogether account for 50% of precursor B-ALL cases.

Both are associated with a favorable outcome, having a5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of greater than 85%.1

This favorable prognosis is most likely due to relativesensitivity of  TEL-AML1 precursor B ALL to L-asparagi-nase,whereas hyperdiploid cases respond well to L-as-paraginase and antimetabolites like 6-mercaptopurineand methotrexate.2,3  Within the TEL-AML1–positive

subtype, prognosis is impaired in approximately 10% of the cases bearing two copies of the TEL-AML1–translo-cated gene, due to the high frequency of early relapsesand increased resistance to prednisolone.4

The unfavorable genetic subtypes BCR-ABL1–posi-

tive ALL and MLL-rearranged ALL each account for lessthan 5% of children with ALL who are older than 1 year of age. In contrast, the portion of  MLL-rearranged ALL

is greater than 80% in infants up to 12 months of age.5

The dismal prognosis has been linked to resistance to

 various drugs, L-asparaginase for  BCR-ABL1–positive ALL and glucocorticoids and L-asparaginase for  MLL-

rearranged ALL.6,7 Investigations have shown that well-

known resistance mechanisms found in (solid) cancers,

such as abnormalities in drug efflux systems (P-glycop-

rotein, multidrug resistance–associated protein, and

others), detoxifying systems (glutathione-linked), apo-

ptosis pathways, amino acid metabolism, and glucocor-ticoid receptor signaling are not the main explanations

for drug resistance in pediatric ALL.8,9 In contrast, ge-

nome-wide technologies have revealed new insights as

to the causes of resistance in pediatric ALL, and as a

consequence have opened a new era of potential resis-tance modifying agents, such as reversing glucocorti-

coid resistance by glycolysis inhibitors.10-12

The above-mentioned genetic abnormalities are

mutually exclusive, although incidentally combina-tions have been reported, such as hyperdiploidy and

TEL-AML1–positivity. These genotypes (with the ex-

ception of hyperdiploidy) result in fusion genes that

affect the self-renewal and differentiation capacity of 

hematopoietic cells. Drugs that specifically target

fusion gene products and/or associated pathways are be-

ing developed and tested in clinical trials. Small-inhibitory 

molecules such as imatinib (Gleevec/Glivec, Novartis)and dasatinib (Bristol-Myers Squibb) have relative speci-

ficity towards activated tyrosine kinases and may there-

fore effectively kill cells that have abnormalities in these

genes, as in BCR-ABL1–positive ALL.13,14

New Recurrent GeneticAbnormalities in Precursor B-ALL

The currently known genotypes used to stratify pa-

tients in risk-adapted treatment regimens only com-

prise about 60% of precursor B-ALL cases. The genetic

Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam–Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Address correspondence to Rob Pieters, MD, PhD, Department of Pedi-

atric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam–

Sophia Children’s Hospital, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015GJ Rotter-

dam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]

0037-1963/09/$ - see front matter

© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.09.006

Seminars in Hematology, Vol 46, No 1, January 2009, pp 16–2316

Page 2: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 2/8

abnormalities in the remaining 40% are unknown, rare,or not mutually exclusive. Since the highest absolutenumber of relapses occurs within this remaining cate-

gory, progress in overall treatment results in pediatric ALL can only be obtained by the discovery of new genetic markers that can be used to identify thosepatients who are at high risk of treatment failure.15

Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21

 A small but prognostic highly unfavorable group, with a 5-year pDFS of less than 30%, harbors an in-trachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21(iAMP21).16 The iAMP21 includes additional copies of the AML1 gene and is found in about 2% of precursor 

B-ALL cases. An additional copy of the AML1 gene islinked to a favorable outcome of  TEL-AML1–positive

 ALL cases, suggesting that the adverse prognosis iniAMP21 cases may not be due to increased activity of 

 AML1-responsive genes.4

Gene Mutations 

Mutations in genes may affect the activity of corre-sponding proteins: activity may increase by mutationsthat alter the life-time, substrate specificity, bindingcapacity, or autoregulatory elements of the protein inquestion. In childhood precursor B-ALL activating mu-tations have been found in the Fms-like tyrosine kinase

receptor gene (  FLT3 ) in approximately 8% of cases,

especially  MLL-rearranged and hyperdiploid ALL.17,18

This gene is involved in the early hematopoiesis by 

activating signal transduction pathways involved in

proliferation and survival of progenitor cells. Mutationsin FLT3 have been shown to abolish the auto-inhibitory 

capacity of the juxtamembrane domain (  FLT3-ITD mu-tation) or result in constitutive activity due to single

amino acid substitutions in the kinase domain (  FLT3-

835/836 mutations). In addition to mutations, a high

expression level of  FLT3 has been linked to a poor prognosis of  MLL-rearranged ALL in infants; the high

expression level itself was sufficient to result in phos-

phorylated (and hence activated) FLT3 receptor with-

out the need for activating mutations.19  Activated FLT3

has been shown to be a good target for newly devel-

oped small-molecule inhibitors that interfere with thecatalytic domain of the tyrosine kinase, abolishing the

further triggering of the downstream survival (AKT-

mediated) and proliferation (RAS/MAPK-mediated) sig-

naling cascades, such as the small-molecule inhibitorsPKC412 and CEP-701.20-22

Besides FLT3, mutations have also been found in

downstream effector genes of tyrosine kinase recep-

tors, such as the SHP-2 protein tyrosine phosphatase–

encoding gene PTPN11. This gene is mutated in about7% of precursor B-ALL cases, mainly common ALL cases

negative for the TEL-AML1 translocation. Mutations in

this gene are often mutually exclusive with other genes

that also affect the downstream RAS/MAPK signaling

Table 1. Summary of Genetic Lesions and Outcome in Pediatric Precursor B-ALL (older than 1 year)

Genetic Abnormality Rearrangement Gene(s)5-Year

DFS (%) Frequency (%)Therapeutic

Inhibitor

Known genotypeTEL-AML1 t(12;21)(p13;q22) TEL; AML1 80-85 20-25

Hyperdiploid Ͼ50 chromosomes 95-90 25E2A-PBX1 t(1;19)(q23;p13) E2A; PBX1 85 5BCR-ABL1 t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR; ABL1 25-40 3-5 Imatinib/dasatinibMLL 11q23 MLL; various fusion

partnersϽ30 2

New recurrentabnormalities

Del9p del(9)(p21) CDKN2A/B  75 30-35 (40-45)1

Del9p del(9)(p21) PAX5 30-35 (40-45)1

iAMP21 ϩ21 or dup(21)(q22q22) AML1 29 2Dic(9;20) dic(9;20)(p11-13;q11) ND ND 2BCR-ABL1–like ND ND 60 15-20

MutationsFLT3 FLT3 Ͻ202 8 (15-20)3 PKC412/CEP-701SHP-2 PTPN11 ND 7

RAS/MAPK kRAS  or  nRAS  ND 16-584 Farnesyl transferaseinhibitor 

 Abbreviation: ND, not determined.1Remaining group; negative for  TEL-AML1, E2A-PBX1, BCR-ABL1, MLL-rearrangements and being non-hyperdiploid.2For  MLL-rearranged or hyperdiploid pre-B-ALL.3For  MLL-rearranged pre-B-ALL.4For hyperdiploid pre-B-ALL.

Genetic abnormalities and treatment response in ALL 17

Page 3: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 3/8

pathway, such as mutations in NRAS  and KRAS . These

 RAS  mutations have been observed at high (but vari-able) frequency in hyperdiploid precursor B-ALL andare hypothesized (but not yet proven) to be associated

 with disease progression.23,24  FLT3, PTPN11, and RAS 

mutations are mostly mutually exclusive and collec-

tively are present in about 35% of all precursor B-ALLcases. This high percentage of abnormalities impliesthat the FLT3-RAS signaling pathway should be further 

explored as a potential target for novel inhibitory drugs.

Chromosome 9p Deletions 

 A relative large group of common/pre-B-ALL casesharbor deletions in chromosome 9p, including (among

others) the cell cycle–inhibitory  CDKN2 locus encod-ing p16  INK4A and p15 INK4B and the B-cell transcription

factor  PAX5 gene.25,26 However, these 9p deletions

 were not restricted to the “remaining” group but were alsofound in BCRABL-positive, MLL-rearranged, TEL-AML1–

positive, and hyperdiploid cases. Chromosome 9p de-letions can vary between the loss of the entire 9pchromosomal region and regions of less than 50 kB in

size of all precursor B-ALL cases.26 Deletions of theCDKN2 locus at primary diagnosis did not affect theprognosis of common/pre-B cases, and involvement of 

CDKN2 deletions in tumor progression is unlikely sincethe incidence of these deletions did not increase attime of relapse in paired initial-relapse samples.25

Abnormalities in TranscriptionFactors Involved in B-Cell Differentiation

PAX5 is a transcription factor involved in the com-mitment of hematopoietic cells to B-lineage differenti-

ation. PAX5 deletions and translocations [ PAX5-TEL asthe result of the t(9;12) and PAX5-ELN as the result of the t(7;9)] have been observed in 30% to 35% of pedi-atric precursor B-ALL cases.26 The prognosis of patientshaving leukemic cells with PAX5 fused to the Ets tran-scription factor TEL hypothetically may be inferior dueto blockade of B-cell differentiation, increased cellular 

migration and homing, and a reduced apoptotic poten-

tial of affected cells.27

 PAX5 deletions deregulate B-celldevelopment by a dominant negative loss-of-functionmechanism.28 The prognostic impact of both PAX5

translocations and PAX5 deletions is unclear in pediat-ric ALL. However, even if PAX5 abnormalities have noprognostic value, the affected genes and pathways still

represent highly interesting candidates for targetedtherapy, since the defect is leukemia-specific andpresent in a high percent of cases.

In addition to PAX5, a high frequency of abnormal-

ities in other transcription factors involved in B-celldifferentiation has been detected. Overall, about 40%of precursor B-ALL cases have deletions, amplifications,

mutations, or translocations in B-cell transcription fac-

tor genes that affect their function, including Ikaros,

 E2A, EBF1, or  PAX5.26,29 9p deletions were also found

in 84% of  BCR-ABL1–positive ALL cases and highly 

correlated with (partial) deletions of the B-cell tran-

scription factor Ikaros /  IKZF1 on chromosome 7p.30  A 

multi-step deficiency in the cell differentiation machin-

ery of precursor B-ALL is implicated, although thecausal relationship between 9p and 7p deletions re-

mains to be demonstrated.31

BCR-ABL1–like ALL

Recent gene expression profiling studies have iden-

tified a new subtype that includes 15% to 20% of all

precursor B-ALL cases and is associated with an unfa-

 vorable outcome, with a 5-years pDFS of approximately 

60%.32 The gene expression profile of these cases re-

sembles that of  BCR-ABL1–positive patients, although

the latter are negative for this translocation; Addition-

ally, so-called BCR-ABL1–like cases are negative for other known genetic abnormalities, including TEL- 

 AML1, MLL-rearrangements, E2A-PBX1, and hyperdip-

loidy. Further characterization of this relative large un-

favorable prognostic group revealed greater than 70%

abnormalities in B-cell differentiation genes, including

 PAX5, Ikaros, and EBF1, which is significantly higher 

compared to 40% observed in the other common/pre-

B-ALL subgroups,26,29 further providing evidence that

the BCR-ABL1–like cases reflect a distinct entity.33

Some of these cases harbor a dicentric chromosome

dic(9;20), but this finding presumably can not explain

the unfavorable prognosis of  BCR-ABL1–like cases,since limited data suggest that the prognosis of dic(9;

20)-positive cases is not worse compared to follow-up

data reported for other precursor B-ALL cases.15,34

It is intriguing that the newly discovered abnormal-

ities/deletions in B-cell transcription factors occur in

high frequency ( Ͼ40%), are often small in size and

found in restricted loci (focal deletions), affect normal

function by lack of expression or by generating domi-

nant (negative) isoforms, or dysregulate B-cell differen-

tiation similar to fusion genes such as TEL-AML1 and

 BCR-ABL1. In general, the well-characterized geno-

types TEL-AML1, BCR-ABL1, MLL-fusion genes ( Ͼ50

partner genes), and E2A-PBX1 result in aberrant tran-

scription and differentiation factors affecting normal

hematopoiesis and cell fate. The recently discovered

abnormalities in B-cell transcription factors such as

 PAX5 and Ikaros may point to a more general mecha-

nism underlying B-lineage leukemia, such as a disturbed

pre-B-cell receptor maturation machinery. The activity 

and/or specificity of recombinase-activating RAG1/2

genes that are normally involved in rearranging V(D)J

segments as part of the B-cell receptor maturation pro-

cess may be altered in these leukemic cells. Recently,

RAG enzymes were postulated to be involved in pro-

ducing isoforms of B-cell transcription factors, as spe-

18 J.P.P. Meijerink, M.L. den Boer, and R. Pieters 

Page 4: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 4/8

cific recombination signal sequences (RSS) recognized

by RAG were found near deleted areas involving the Ikaros gene.30

T-CELL ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

In contrast to childhood B-lineage ALL, for which

the general outcome has improved over the last de-cades to cure rates reaching nearly 85%, the prognosisfor children with T-ALL remains inferior: about 30% of these patients relapse following initiation of currenttreatment protocols.35

To date, many different types of genetic abnormali-ties have been identified in T-ALL, including chromo-somal translocations as consequence of erroneous T-cell receptor (TCR) rearrangements, non–TCR-driven

translocations, amplification, deletions, and point mu-

tations.36,37 Some of these abnormalities, which wedenote as “type A mutations,” occur in a mutually exclusive fashion and are responsible for arrest atspecific T-cell development stages (see Table 2 ).Based on gene expression profiling studies usingmicroarrays, growing evidence emerges that T-ALL

may comprise at least five distinct subgroups, each with a unique gene expression signature.38-40 The HOX11/ TLX1 and HOX11L2/TLX3 subgroups com-prise T-ALL cases with chromosomal translocationsaffecting the HOX11 or the HOX11L2 oncogenes,respectively. These two subgroups reflect distinctentities that may have opposing prognostic rele-

 vance. The HOX11 subgroup has been associated with excellent prognosis,41,42  whereas HOX11L2-positive T-ALL in various studies has been associated

 with a poor outcome.38,43,44

Table 2. Frequency of Molecular–Cytogenetic Aberrations in T-All, Relation to Outcome, and PotentialTherapeutic Targets

Type AMutations/

T-ALL Subgroups Rearrangement Gene(s) Outcome Frequency (%) Therapeutic Inhibitor

TAL/LMO t(1;14)(p32;q11)/t(1;7)(p32;q34) TAL1 Good? 15 HDAC inhibitor  1p32 deletion SIL/TAL1 Good? 4t(7;9)(q34;q32) TAL2 Unknown Ͻ1t(11;14)(p15;q11)/t(7;11)(q34;p15) LMO1 Unknown Ͻ1t(11;14)(p13;q11)/t(7;11)(q34;p13) LMO2 Unknown 711p13 deletions LMO2 Unknown 3

HOX11 t(10;14)(q24;q11)/t(7;10)(q34;q24) HOX11 Good 8HOX11L2 t(5;14)(q35;q32) HOX11L2 Poor 24

inv(7)p15q34)/t(7;7)(p15;q34) HOXA Undefined 5HOXA t(10;11)(p13;q14)

t(11;19)(q23;p13)9q34 deletions

CALM-AF10MLL-ENLSET-NUP214

Poor UnknownUnknown

4Ͻ1

3

Histone H3K79 methyltransferaseinhibitor 

Unknown t(7;19)(q34;p13) LYL1 Unknown Ͻ1t(14;21)(q11.2;q22) BHLHB1 Unknown Ͻ1t(6;7)(q23;q34) MYB  Unknown 3

Type B Mutations Rearrangement Gene(s) Outcome Frequency (%) Therapeutic Inhibitor

Cell cycle 9p21 deletions hypermethylation CDKN2A/2B CDKN2A/2B 

Unknown 70 DNA methyltransferase inhibitor  

t(7;12)(q34;p13)/t(12;14)(p13;q11) CCND2 Unknown Ͻ1NOTCH1 t(7;9)(q34;q34)

MutationsNOTCH1NOTCH1

UnknownGood

Ͻ1Ͼ50

␥ -secretase inhibitors

Mutations FBXW7  Good 9-30(pre)TCR t(1;7)(p34;q34) LCK  Unknown Ͻ1 SRC kinase inhibitor 

Mutations17q11.2 deletion

RAS NF1

UnknownUnknown

103

Farnesyltransferase inhibitor 

10q23.31 deletion PTEN  Unknown Ͻ1 PI3K/AKT inhibitorsMutations PTEN  Unknown 17

Differentiation 6q23 duplication MYB  Unknown 8-15Tyrosine kinases 9q34 amplification NUP214-

ABL1Poor 4 ABL kinase inhibitor  

t(9;14)(q34;q32) EML1-ABL1 Unknown Ͻ1t(9;12)(q34;p13) ETV6-ABL1 Unknown Ͻ1t(9;22)(q34;q11) BCR-ABL1 Unknown Ͻ1t(9;12)(p24;p13) ETV6-JAK2 Unknown Ͻ1Mutations FLT3 No

impact3

Genetic abnormalities and treatment response in ALL 19

Page 5: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 5/8

Other subgroups, including the TAL/LMO and the

 HOXA subgroups, may comprise various molecular–cytogenetic abnormalities affecting many different on-cogenes. The TAL/LMO subgroup includes T-ALL cases

 with chromosomal aberrations affecting one of thehomologous basic helix-loop-helix genes (bHLH) TAL1

or  TAL2, and/or one of the homologous LIM-domainonly (LMO) genes LMO1 or  LMO2. These bHLH andLMO genes encode for cofactors that form a multifactor transcription complex, possibly explaining why these

abnormalities share a similar expression profile.37,40

The oncogenic role of this complex has been hypoth-esized to reflect inhibition of the E2A/HEB transcrip-tion factors.45  As transcriptional repression requiresrecruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs), patients

 with TAL/LMO abnormalities might benefit from theaddition of HDAC inhibitors to combination treatment.

 Whether or not this subgroup has prognostic signifi-cance needs to be established.

The HOXA subgroup includes T-ALL cases with ab-errant activation of various members of the HOXA genecluster including HOXA9 and HOXA10.39,40,46  HOXA

activation can be due to rearrangements of the TCR␤

locus directly into the HOXA gene cluster due toan inversion or translocations on chromosome 7[Inv(7)(p15q34) or t(7;7)(p15;q34)],39,46 translocationsresulting in CALM-AF1039,47 or  MLL fusion products,48

or due to a deletion on chromosome 9 [del(9)

(q34.11q34.13)] giving rise to a SET-NUP214 fusionproduct.40 The CALM-AF10 and the MLL and the SET-NUP214 fusion products bind in the promoter regions

of specific members of the HOXA gene cluster, andrecruit the histone H3-Lysine79 methyltransferasehDOT1L that promotes further epigenetic chromatinemodifications and HOXA genes activation.40,49,50 Pa-tients in this subgroup may therefore benefit fromhistone H3-K79 methyltransferase inhibitors. CALM- 

 AF10–positive T-ALL has been associated with a poor outcome,51,52 but further investigation is necessary tostudy whether this prognosis applies to the entire

 HOXA subgroup.In contrast to type A mutations, type B mutations

are present in T-ALL irrespective of the T-ALL sub-

grouping (see Table 2 ). Type B abnormalities there-fore mirror common abnormalities and affect variouscellular processes, including cell cycle, T-cell com-mitment and self-renewal, TCR signaling processes,

or they result in the aberrant activation of tyrosinekinases.

In relation to loss of cell cycle regulators, the mostimportant abnormalities observed in T-ALL are homo-or heterozygous deletions of the cyclin-D/cyclin-depen-dent kinase-4 (CDK4) inhibitors p15/CDKN2B, p16/ 

CDKN2A in about 65% of pediatric T-ALL cases. The

CDKN2A locus also encodes for the alternative p14ARF 

gene, which is part of the p53-regulated cell cycle and

apoptosis machinery. The true proportion may be un-

derestimated, as inactivation of these loci in T-ALL may occur from silencing, especially by promoter hyper-

methylation, which may provide a rationale for clinicalutlization of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors. Also,inactivation by point-mutations or post-transcriptionalmodifications has been described.53 Loss of p16 and/or 

 ARF  in mouse models promoted T-cell leukemogene-sis,54  whereas reintroduction of these loci delayed on-cogenesis.55

The transmembrane receptor  NOTCH1 is important

during hematopoiesis; it promotes self-renewal of stem-cells and T-lineage commitment of early lymphoid pro-genitor cells.56 For a long time, NOTCH1 has beenimplicated in T-ALL leukemogenesis due to its involve-ment in the rare translocation t(7;9).57 More recently,

 NOTCH1 was found to be mutated in more than 50% of T-ALL cases. Mutations are located in the heterodimer-ization (HD) or adjacent juxtamembrane domains.Other mutations disrupt the C-terminal domain rich in

proline, glutamate, serine and threonine amino acidsalso denoted as the PEST domain, which normally func-tions as a target for the F-box protein FBXW7 as part of the E3-ubiquitin ligase complex that targets intracellu-lar NOTCH1 (ICN) for proteolytic degradation.58 PESTmutations can occur in combination with HD muta-tions. NOTCH1 mutations promote ligand-independentNOTCH1 cleavage by proteases such as ␥ -secretase,58,59

resulting in the release of ICN, which functions as a

transcription factor. Therefore, treatment of T-ALL us-ing ␥ -secretase inhibitors seemed promising. However,a phase I/II clinical study using ␥ -secretase inhibitors in

children with T-ALL has been unsuccessful to date, dueto low antitumor effectiveness and severe gastrointes-tinal toxicity.60

The FBXW7  gene is inactivated by mutations in 8%to 30% of T-ALL patients, occasionally in combination

 with NOTCH1 HD mutations, and provides an alterna-

tive mechanism for NOTCH1 activation in T-ALL.61,62

The presence of  NOTCH1 mutations and/or  FBXW7 

mutations has been correlated to good initial treatmentresponse and good outcome.63,64

During normal T-cell development, NOTCH1 is animportant transcription factor that activates a variety of 

genes. NOTCH1 also controls the assembly of the pre-TCR complex during T-cell development by regulatingthe expression of the pre-TCR alpha gene (  pT ␣ ). For 

 various T-ALL oncogenes, a pivotal synergistic role for 

this pre-TCR complex has been demonstrated in T-cellleukemogenesis. An important oncogenic role of thiscomplex was further supported by the finding of rear-rangements or (in)activating point mutations in directdownstream signaling components of this pathway, or in the closely associated RAS-MAPK and the PI3K-AKTpathways. These include aberrant expression of  SRC -kinase LCK  due to the t(1;7) translocation ( Ͻ1%),65

activating RAS mutations ( ϳ8%–10%),66 inactivating de-

letions/mutations of the RAS regulator NF1 ( ϳ3%),67 or 

20 J.P.P. Meijerink, M.L. den Boer, and R. Pieters 

Page 6: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 6/8

inactivating mutations of  PTEN  ( ϳ17%) resulting in

constitutive activation of the AKT survival pathway.68

These findings also may provide new rationales for experimental protocols to treat T-ALL with either SRC-kinase inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors, or PI3K-AKT inhibitors.

Finally, some mutations involve the formation of fusion products with potent tyrosine kinase activity.Several of these fusion products affect the tyrosinekinase domain of ABL1 due to rare translocations in-

cluding BCR-ABL1, EML1-ABL1, and ETV6-ABL1. The NUP214-ABL1 fusion product due to an extra chromo-somal amplification has been identified in about 6% of T-ALL cases. To date, this abnormality has predomi-nantly been identified in T-ALL subclones of the

 HOX11L2, HOX11, and HOXA subgroups, suggestingthat it represents an important mechanism for diseaseprogression, as a relative late event in T-ALL that syn-ergizes with deregulated HOX  genes.69  Activation of 

the tyrosine kinase activity of  FLT3 due to tandemduplications in the juxtamembrane domain have beenidentified in leukemic subclones in less than 3% of theT-ALL cases.70  Although NUP214-ABL or mutant FLT3

positive T-ALL may respond to potent tyrosine kinaseinhibitors, including imatinib69 or PKC412 (Novartis),such treatment may only be effective against theseleukemic subclones, leaving residual T-ALL cells fromthe original clone unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic classification of ALL has already become very important for daily practice in treating children with ALL. In the last decade, the application of new genome-wide screening techniques, such as microar-

ray-based gene expression studies and array-compara-tive genomic hybridization (array-CGH) studies, haveled to the discovery of many new genetic abnormalitiesin childhood B- and T-lineage ALL. The exact functionalrole of these abnormalities in the development of ALLremains to be elucidated, as well as their roles asprognostic factors or as potential therapeutic targets.Knowledge gained from current and future studies willlead to a better diagnostic classification and to im-

proved patient-directed or individualized therapy for every child with ALL in the coming decades.

REFERENCES1. Pui CH, Relling MV, Downing JR. Acute lymphoblastic

leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1535-48.

2. Ramakers-van Woerden NL, Pieters R, Loonen AH,

Hubeek I, van Drunen E, Beverloo HB, et al. TEL/AML1

gene fusion is related to in vitro drug sensitivity for 

L-asparaginase in childhood acute lymphoblastic leuke-

mia. Blood. 2000;96:1094-9.

3. Kaspers GJL, Smets LA, Pieters R, Van Zantwijk CH,

 Van Werin g ER, Veerman AJP. Favorable prognosis of 

hyperdiploid common acute lymphoblastic leukemia

may be explained by sensitivity to antimetabolites and

other drugs: results of an in vitro study. Blood.

1995;85:751-6.

4. Stams WA, Beverloo HB, Den Boer ML, de Menezes RX,

Stigter RL, Van Drunen E, et al. Incidence of additional

genetic changes in the TEL and AML1 genes in DCOG

and COALL-treated t(12;21)-positive pediatric ALL, and

their relation with drug sensitivity and clinical outcome.Leukemia. 2006;20:410-6.

5. Pieters R, Schrappe M, De Lorenzo P, Hann I, De Rossi G,

Felice M, et al. A treatment protocol for infants younger 

than one year of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

(Interfant-99): an observational study and multicentre

randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:240-50.

6. Ramakers-van Woerden NL, Pieters R, Hoelzer D, Slater 

RM, den Boer ML, Loonen AH, et al. In vitro drug resis-

tance profile of Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblas-

tic leukemia is heterogeneous and related to age: a re-

port of the Dutch and German Leukemia Study Groups.

Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002;38:379-86.

7. Pieters R, Den Boer ML, Durian M, Janka G, Schmiege-low K, Kaspers GJL, et al. Relation between age, im-

munophenotype and in vitro drug resistance in 395

children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia—implica-

tions for treatment of infants. Leukemia. 1998;12:

1344-8.

8. Tissing WJ, Meijerink JP, Den Boer ML, Pieters R. Molec-

ular determinants of glucocorticoid sensitivity and resis-

tance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2003;

17:17-25.

9. Den Boer ML, Pieters R. Microarray-based identification

of new targets for specific therapies in pediatric leuke-

mia. Current Drug Targets. 2007;8:761-4.

10. Holleman A, Cheok MH, Den Boer ML, Yang W, Veer-man AJP, Kazemier KM, et al. Gene-expression pat-

terns in drug-resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia

cells and response to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2004;

351:533-42.

11. Lugthart S, Cheok MH, Den Boer ML, Yang W, Holleman

 A, Cheng C, et al. Identification of genes associated with

chemotherapy crossresistance and treatment response

in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell.

2005;7:375-86.

12. Hulleman E, Kazemier KM, Holleman A, VanderWeele

DJ, Rudin CM, Broekhuis MJC, et al. Inhibition of glyco-

lysis modulates prednisolone resistance in acute lympho-

blastic leukemia cells. Blood. In press.

13. Champagne MA, Capdeville R, Krailo M, Qu W, Peng B,

Rosamilia M, et al. Imatinib mesylate (STI571) for treat-

ment of children with Philadelphia chromosome-posi-

tive leukemia: results from a Children’s Oncology Group

phase I study. Blood. 2004;104:2655-60.

14. Porkka K, Koskenvesa P, Lundán T, Rimpiläinen J, Mus-

tjoki S, Smykla R, et al. Dasatinib crosses the blood-brain

barrier and is an efficient therapy for central nervous

system Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia.

Blood. 2008;112:1005-12.

15. Möricke A, Reiter A, Zimmermann M, Gadner H, Stanulla

M, Dördelmann M, et al. Risk-adjusted therapy of acute

lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden

and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 uns-

Genetic abnormalities and treatment response in ALL 21

Page 7: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 7/8

elected pediatric and adolescent patients enrolled in the

trial ALL-BFM 95. Blood. 2008;111:4477-89.

16. Moorman AV, Richards SM, Robinson HM, Strefford JC,

Gibson BE, Kinsey SE, et al. Prognosis of children with

acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and intrachromo-

somal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21). Blood.

2007;109:2327-30.

17. Andersson A, Paulsson K, Lilljebjörn H, Lassen C, Ström-beck B, Heldrup J, et al. FLT3 mutations in a 10 year 

consecutive series of 177 childhood acute leukemias and

their impact on global gene expression patterns. Genes

Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47:64-70.

18. Armstrong SA, Mabon ME, Silverman LB, Li A, Gribben

 JG, Fox EA, et al. FLT3 mutations in childhood acute

lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2004;103:3544-6.

19. Stam RW, Schneider P, De Lorenzo P, Valsecchi MG, Den

Boer ML, Pieters R. Prognostic significance of high-level

FLT3 expression in MLL-rearranged infant acute lympho-

blastic leukemia. Blood. 2007;110:2774-5.

20. Armstrong SA, Kung AL, Mabon ME, Silverman LB, Stam

RW, Den Boer ML, et al. Inhibition of FLT3 in MLL. Validation of a therapeutic target identified by gene expres-

sion based classification. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:173-83.

21. Stam RW, Den Boer ML, Schneider P, Nollau P, Horst-

mann M, Beverloo HB, et al. Targeting FLT3 in primary 

MLL-gene-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leuke-

mia. Blood. 2005;106:2484-90.

22. Brown P, Levis M, Shurtleff S, Campana D, Downing JR,

Small D. FLT3 inhibition selectively kills childhood acute

lymphoblastic leukemia cells with high levels of FLT3

expression. Blood. 2005;105:812-20.

23. Case M, Matheson E, Minto L, Hassan R, Harrison CJ,

Brown N, et al. Mutation of genes affecting the RAS

pathway is common in childhood acute lymphoblastic

leukemia. Cancer Res. 2008;68:6803-9.24. Paulsson K, Horvat A, Strömbeck B, Nilsson F, Heldrup J,

Behrendtz M, et al. Mutations in FLT3, NRAS, KRAS and

PTPN11 are frequent and possibly mutually exclusive in

high hyperdiploid childhood acute lymphoblastic leuke-

mia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47:26-33.

25. van Zutven LJ, van Drunen E, de Bont JM, Wattel MM,

Den Boer ML, Pieters R, et al. CDKN2 deletions have no

prognostic value in childhood precursor-B acute lympho-

blastic leukaemia. Leukemia. 2005;19:1281-4.

26. Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, Miller CB, Coustan-

Smith E, Dalton JD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of ge-

netic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Na-

ture. 2007;446:758-64.27. Fazio G, Palmi C, Rolink A, Biondi A, Cazzaniga G. PAX5/ 

TEL acts as a transcriptional repressor causing down-

modulation of CD19, enhances migration to CXCL12 and

confers survival advantage in pre-BI cells. Cancer Res.

2008;68:181-9.

28. Cobaleda C, Schebesta A, Delogu A, Busslinger M. Pax5:

the guardian of B cell identity and function. Nat Immu-

nol. 2007;8:463-9.

29. Kuiper RP, Schoenmakers EFPM, Van Reijmersdal SV,

Hehir-Kwa JY, Geurts van Kessel A, Van Leeuwen FN, et

al. High-resolution genomic profiling of childhood ALL

reveals novel recurrent genetic lesions affecting path-

 ways involved in lymphocyte differentiation and cell

cycle progression. Leukemia. 2007;21:1258-66.

30. Mullighan CG, Miller CB, Radtke I, Phillips LA, Dalton J, Ma

 J, et al. BCR-ABL1 lymphoblastic leukaemia is characterized

by the deletion of Ikaros. Nature. 2008;453:110-4.

31. Mullighan CG, Williams RT, Downing JR, Sherr CJ. Fail-

ure of CDKN2A/B (INK4A/B-ARF)-mediated tumor sup-

pression and resistance to targeted therapy in acute

lymphoblastic leukemia induced by BCR-ABL. Genes

Dev. 2008;22:1411-5.32. Den Boer ML, De Menezes RX, Cheok MH, Buijs-Glad-

dines JGCAM, Peters TCJM, Van Zutven LJCM, et al.

 Application of gene expression signatures for classifica-

tion of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a criti-

cal validation study and identification of a novel BCR-

 ABL-like subtype. Manuscript in preparation.

33. Van Slegtenhorst M, De Menezes RX, Pieters R, Den

Boer ML. Genetic characterization of a new subgroup

of childhood precursor B-ALL with a very poor prog-

nosis [abstract 320]. Br J Haematol. 2008;141 Suppl

1:118.

34. Clark R, Byatt SA, Bennett CF, Brama M, Martineau M,

Moorman AV, et al. Monosomy 20 as a pointer to dicen-tric (9;20) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia.

2000;14:241-5.

35. Pui CH, Evans WE. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic

leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:166-78.

36. De Keersmaecker K, Marynen P, Cools J. Genetic in-

sights in the pathogenesis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic

leukemia. Haematologica. 2005;90:1116-27.

37. Van Vlierberghe P, Pieters R, Beverloo HB, Meijerink JP.

Molecular-genetic insights in paediatric T-cell acute lym-

phoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2008, Aug 7.

38. Ferrando AA, Neuberg DS, Staunton J, Loh ML, Huard C,

Raimondi SC, et al. Gene expression signatures define

novel oncogenic pathways in T cell acute lymphoblastic

leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:75-87.39. Soulier J, Clappier E, Cayuela JM, Regnault A, Garcia-

Peydro M, Dombret H, et al. HOXA genes are included in

genetic and biologic networks defining human acute

T-cell leukemia (T-ALL). Blood. 2005;106:274-86.

40. Van Vlierberghe P, van Grotel M, Tchinda J, Lee C,

Beverloo HB, van der Spek PJ, et al. The recurrent SET-

NUP214 fusion as a new HOXA activation mechanism in

pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood.

2008;111:4668-80.

41. Cave H, Suciu S, Preudhomme C, Poppe B, Robert A,

Uyttebroeck A, et al. Clinical significance of HOX11L2

expression linked to t(5;14)(q35;q32), of HOX11 expres-

sion, and of SIL-TAL fusion in childhood T-cell malignan-cies: results of EORTC studies 58881 and 58951. Blood.

2004;103:442-50.

42. Ferrando AA, Neuberg DS, Dodge RK, Paietta E, Larson

RA, Wiernik PH, et al. Prognostic importance of TLX1

(HOX11) oncogene expression in adults with T-cell

acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2004;363:535-6.

43. van Grotel M, Meijerink JP, van Wering ER, Langerak 

 AW, Beverloo HB, Buijs-Gladdines JG, et al. Prognostic

significance of molecular-cytogenetic abnormalities in

pediatric T-ALL is not explained by immunophenotypic

differences. Leukemia. 2008;22:124-31.

44. Baak U, Gokbuget N, Orawa H, Schwartz S, Hoelzer D,

Thiel E, et al. Thymic adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic

leukemia stratified in standard- and high-risk group by 

22 J.P.P. Meijerink, M.L. den Boer, and R. Pieters 

Page 8: New Genetic Abnormalities

7/27/2019 New Genetic Abnormalities

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/new-genetic-abnormalities 8/8

aberrant HOX11L2 expression: experience of the

German Multicenter ALL Study Group. Leukemia.

2008;22:

1154-60.

45. Herblot S, Steff AM, Hugo P, Aplan PD, Hoang T. SCL and

LMO1 alter thymocyte differentiation: inhibition of E2A-

HEB function and pre-T alpha chain expression. Nat

Immunol. 2000;1:138-44.46. Speleman F, Cauwelier B, Dastugue N, Cools J, Verhas-

selt B, Poppe B, et al. A new recurrent inversion,

inv(7)(p15q34), leads to transcriptional activation of 

HOXA10 and HOXA11 in a subset of T-cell acute lym-

phoblastic leukemias. Leukemia. 2005;19:358-66.

47. Dik WA, Brahim W, Braun C, Asnafi V, Dastugue N,

Bernard OA, et al. CALM-AF10ϩ T-ALL expression pro-

files are characterized by overexpression of HOXA and

BMI1 oncogenes. Leukemia. 2005;19:1948-57.

48. Ferrando AA, Armstrong SA, Neuberg DS, Sallan SE, Sil-

 verman LB, Korsmeyer SJ, et al. Gene expression signa-

tures in MLL-rearranged T-lineage and B-precursor acute

leukemias: dominance of HOX dysregulation. Blood.2003;102:262-8.

49. Okada Y, Feng Q, Lin Y, Jiang Q, Li Y, Coffield VM, et al.

hDOT1L links histone methylation to leukemogenesis.

Cell. 2005;121:167-78.

50. Okada Y, Jiang Q, Lemieux M, Jeannotte L, Su L, Zhang

 Y. Leukaemic transformation by CALM-AF10 involves

upregulation of Hoxa5 by hDOT1L. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;

8:1017-24.

51. Asnafi V, Radford-Weiss I, Dastugue N, Bayle C, Leboeuf 

D, Charrin C, et al. CALM-AF10 is a common fusion

transcript in T-ALL and is specific to the TCRgammadelta

lineage. Blood. 2003;102:1000-6.

52. van Grotel M, Meijerink JP, Beverloo HB, Langerak AW,

Buys-Gladdines JG, Schneider P, et al. The outcome of molecular-cytogenetic subgroups in pediatric T-cell

acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective study of 

patients treated according to DCOG or COALL proto-

cols. Haematologica. 2006;91:1212-21.

53. Batova A, Diccianni MB, Yu JC, Nobori T, Link MP,

Pullen J, et al. Frequent and selective methylation of p15

and deletion of both p15 and p16 in T-cell acute lym-

phoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 1997;57:832-6.

54. Shank-Calvo JA, Draheim K, Bhasin M, Kelliher MA.

p16Ink4a or p19Arf loss contributes to Tal1-induced

leukemogenesis in mice. Oncogene. 2006;25:3023-31.

55. Fasseu M, Aplan PD, Chopin M, Boissel N, Bories JC,

Soulier J, et al. p16INK4A tumor suppressor gene expres-sion and CD3epsilon deficiency but not pre-TCR defi-

ciency inhibit TAL1-linked T-lineage leukemogenesis.

Blood. 2007;110:2610-9.

56. Roy M, Pear WS, Aster JC. The multifaceted role of Notch

in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17:52-9.

57. Ellisen LW, Bird J, West DC, Soreng AL, Reynolds TC,

Smith SD, et al. TAN-1, the human homolog of the

Drosophila notch gene, is broken by chromosomal trans-

locations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell. 1991;66:

649-61.

58. Weng AP, Ferrando AA, Lee W, Morris JP, Silverman LB,

Sanchez-Irizarry C, et al. Activating mutations of 

NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Science. 2004;306:269-71.

59. Sulis ML, Williams O, Palomero T, Tosello V, Pallikup-

pam S, Real PJ, et al. NOTCH1 extracellular juxtamem-brane expansion mutations in T-ALL. Blood. 2008;112:

733-40.

60. DeAngelo DJ. A phase I clinical trial of the Notch inhib-

itor MK-0752 in patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic

leukemia (T-ALL) and other leukemias [abstract]. J Clin

Oncol (ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I). 2006;

6585.

61. O’Neil J, Grim J, Strack P, Rao S, Tibbitts D, Winter C, et

al. FBW7 mutations in leukemic cells mediate NOTCH

pathway activation and resistance to gamma-secretase

inhibitors. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1813-24.

62. Thompson BJ, Buonamici S, Sulis ML, Palomero T, Vili-

mas T, Basso G, et al. The SCFFBW7 ubiquitin ligasecomplex as a tumor suppressor in T cell leukemia. J Exp

Med. 2007;204:1825-35.

63. Breit S, Stanulla M, Flohr T, Schrappe M, Ludwig WD,

Tolle G, et al. Activating NOTCH1 mutations predict

favorable early treatment response and long-term out-

come in childhood precursor T-cell lymphoblastic leuke-

mia. Blood. 2006;108:1151-7.

64. Malyukova A, Dohda T, von der Lehr N, Akhoondi S,

Corcoran M, Heyman M, et al. The tumor suppressor 

gene hCDC4 is frequently mutated in human T-cell acute

lymphoblastic leukemia with functional consequences

for Notch signaling. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5611-6.

65. Tycko B, Smith SD, Sklar J. Chromosomal translocations

 joining LCK and TCRB loci in human T cell leukemia. J Exp Med. 1991;174:867-73.

66. Kawamura M, Ohnishi H, Guo SX, Sheng XM, Minegishi

M, Hanada R, et al. Alterations of the p53, p21, p16, p15

and RAS genes in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic

leukemia. Leuk Res. 1999;23:115-26.

67. Balgobind BV, Van Vlierberghe P, van den Ouweland

 AM, Beverloo HB, Terlouw-Kromosoeto JN, van Wering

ER, et al. Leukemia-associated NF1 inactivation in pa-

tients with pediatric T-ALL and AML lacking evidence for 

neurofibromatosis. Blood. 2008;111:4322-8.

68. Palomero T, Dominguez M, Ferrando AA. The role of the

PTEN/AKT pathway in NOTCH1-induced leukemia. Cell

Cycle. 2008;7:965-70.69. Graux C, Cools J, Melotte C, Quentmeier H, Ferrando A,

Levine R, et al. Fusion of NUP214 to ABL1 on amplified

episomes in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat

Genet. 2004;36:1084-9.

70. Van Vlierberghe P, Meijerink JP, Stam RW, van der Smis-

sen W, van Wering ER, Beverloo HB, et al. Activating

FLT3 mutations in CD4ϩ /CD8Ϫ pediatric T-cell acute

lymphoblastic leukemias. Blood. 2005;106:4414-5.

Genetic abnormalities and treatment response in ALL 23