Upload
najwa
View
24
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
New Media Centers 2001 Salary Survey. David Herrington Manager, Academic Technology Services Princeton University May 25, 2001. Art Institute of Boston Bradley University Brown University California State University, Chico Johns Hopkins University Lafayette College - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
New Media Centers 2001 Salary Survey
David Herrington
Manager, Academic Technology Services
Princeton University
May 25, 2001
Participating Schools Art Institute of Boston Bradley University Brown University California State
University, Chico Johns Hopkins
University Lafayette College Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
Mount Holyoke College New York University Ohio State University Princeton University Santa Fe Community
College Southern Illinois
University at Carbondale
Participating Schools (cont’d) Terra Community
College University of California,
Davis University of Nebraska,
Lincoln University of New
Mexico
University of North Dakota, Grand Forks
University of Rochester University of St.
Thomas University of Texas at
Austin Virginia Tech
Participating Schools
SCHOOL COUNT FUNDINGREGION Private State Grand TotalMW 2 5 7NE 8 8S 1 2 3W 4 4Grand Total 11 11 22
Positions Reported
POSITION COUNT FUNDINGREGION Private State Grand TotalMW 9 17 26NE 21 21S 1 4 5W 12 12Grand Total 31 33 64
Regional Cost of Living Adjustment Why?
A $40K job in New York pays less than a $40K job in Lincoln Nebraska.
Statistics less meaningful if not performed. How?
Using the “Salary Wizard” at salary.com Benchmark job: Internet and New Media
Content Specialist
COLA Calculation
For each region participating in survey, look up the annual salary of "Internet and New Media" occupation "Content Specialist" on salary.com. Call this test salary TS.
Calculate the multiplier M to convert to Columbus dollars as follows: M = 44180 / TS.
All salaries converted to Columbus dollars prior to statistical calculations.
To convert salary averages and ranges back to regional dollars, multiply by 1/M.
•Region •TS •M •1/M
New York, NY 50,673 87.19% 114.70%
New Brunswick, NJ 49,620 89.04% 112.31%
Boston, MA 47,733 92.56% 108.04%
Boston, MA 47,733 92.56% 108.04%
Sacramento, CA 46,987 94.03% 106.35%
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN 45,934 96.18% 103.97%
Rochester, NY 45,627 96.83% 103.28%
Springfield MA 45,320 97.48% 102.58%
Baltimore, MD 44,794 98.63% 101.39%
Peoria, IL 44,487 99.31% 100.69%
Providence, RI 44,355 99.61% 100.40%
Columbus, OH 44,180 100.00% 100.00%
Areas with higher cost of living than Columbus Ohio
Areas with lower cost of living than Columbus Ohio
Region TS M 1/M
Columbus, OH 44,180 100.00% 100.00%
Toledo, OH 43,916 100.60% 99.40%
Chico, CA 43,609 101.31% 98.71%
Allentown, PA 43,170 102.34% 97.71%
Springfield IL 42,732 103.39% 96.72%
Austin, TX 41,898 105.45% 94.83%
Roanoke, VA 41,767 105.78% 94.54%
Albuquerque, NM 41,591 106.22% 94.14%
Grand Forks, ND 41,108 107.47% 93.05%
Santa Fe, NM 40,977 107.82% 92.75%
Lincoln, NE 40,757 108.40% 92.25%
Statistics in a Nutshell Numeric Mean
Commonly known as “average” Mean of [1,3,4,9,20] is (1+3+4+9+20) / 5 = 7.4
Median Middle value if odd number of values Average of two middle values if even number Median of [1,3,4,9,20] is 4
Mode Most common value
Statistics in a Nutshell Normal Distribution
Mean
± 1 SD - 68% ± 2 SD - 95% ± 3 SD - 99%
68%
Statistics in a Nutshell Mean of sample may not equal
population mean
Sample mean 1 Sample mean 2
Population mean
Statistics in a Nutshell Confidence interval
estimate of population mean
Sample mean 1
95% certain population mean is within confidence interval
And now, the survey results…
Consultant / Specialist Digital Audio-Visual Staff Digital Media Specialist Educational Technology Center
Consultant Educational Technology Center
Consultant Graphics Research Specialist Graphics Research Specialist Information Technology
Consultant Information Technology
Consultant Instructional Support Assistant Instructional Technologist
Instructional Technology Consultant
Instructional Technology Consultant
Instructional Technology Consultant
Media Production Specialist III Multimedia Specialist NMC Operations Assistant Senior Technologist Senior Technologist Senior Technologist Sr. Graphics Research Specialist Systems Specialist
Consultant/Specialist Degree
0=none; 1=Assoc; 2=Bachelor; 3=Masters; 4=Doctorate
Mean 2.50 Median 2.00 Mode 2.00 Standard Deviation 0.74 Count 22.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.33
Consultant/Specialist Full-time staff
Mean 0.36 Median - Mode - Standard Deviation 0.49 Count 22.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.22
(“-” means zero in above.)
Consultant/Specialist Part-time staff
Mean 3.95 Median 3.00 Mode 6.00 Standard Deviation 3.24 Count 22.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 1.44
Consultant/Specialist Adjusted salary
Mean 42,211 Median 41,293 Mode 47,953 Standard Deviation 8,565 Count 22 Confidence Level(95.0%) 3,797
Coordinator Coordinator of Course Management Systems Coordinator of Educational Catalyst Center Faculty Coordinator Instructional Tech Project Man / NMC
Coordinator Instructional Technology Coordinator Multimedia Developer / Lab Coordinator Online Operations Coordinator
Coordinator Degree
0=none; 1=Assoc; 2=Bachelor; 3=Masters; 4=Doctorate
Mean 2.25 Median 2.00 Mode 2.00 Standard Deviation 0.46 Count 8.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.39
Coordinator Full-time staff
Mean 0.56 Median 0.50 Mode - Standard Deviation 0.62 Count 8.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.52
(“-” means zero in above.)
Coordinator Part-time staff
Mean 6.25 Median 4.00 Mode 4.00 Standard Deviation 6.86 Count 8.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 5.74
Coordinator Adjusted Salary
Mean 42,429 Median 41,805 Mode #N/AStandard Deviation 9,892 Count 8 Confidence Level(95.0%) 8,270
Manager Academic Computing
Lab Manager Computer Facilities
Manager Director, NMC Educational Technology
Center Lab Manager Facilities Director Manager of Educational
Technology Center (New Media Center)
Manager, Academic Technology Services
Media Production Specialist
Multimedia Lab Manager Multimedia Lab Manager NMC Manager Operations Manager,
Distributed Learning Technology
Manager Degree
Mean 2.58 Median 3.00 Mode 3.00 Standard Deviation 0.67 Count 12.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.42
0=none; 1=Assoc; 2=Bachelor; 3=Masters; 4=Doctorate
Manager Full-time staff
Mean 1.17 Median - Mode - Standard Deviation 1.70 Count 12.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 1.08
(“-” means zero in above.)
Manager Part-time staff
Mean 10.42 Median 10.50 Mode 20.00 Standard Deviation 6.75 Count 12.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 4.29
Manager Adjusted Salary
Mean 44,087 Median 44,096 Mode 32,870 Standard Deviation 12,918 Count 12 Confidence Level(95.0%) 8,208
Director Acting Director / Associate
Professor Associate Director Associate Director Associate Director, IET
Mediaworks Director Director & Assistant
Professor Director, Center for
Instructional Technologies
Director, CoLA New Media Center Director of Academic Computing / NMC Director
Director of Research Director of the Multimedia
Lab Executive Producer Instructional Aides Associate
/ Director of ETS Manager, New Media and
Extended Learning Group
Director Degree
Mean 3.36 Median 3.00 Mode 3.00 Standard Deviation 0.50 Count 14.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 0.29
0=none; 1=Assoc; 2=Bachelor; 3=Masters; 4=Doctorate
Director Full-time staff
Mean 9.50 Median 6.00 Mode 3.00 Standard Deviation 11.47 Count 14.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 6.62
Director Part-time staff
Mean 7.92 Median 6.00 Mode 4.00 Standard Deviation 7.23 Count 13.00 Confidence Level(95.0%) 4.37
Director Adjusted salary
Mean 69,102 Median 62,726 Mode #N/AStandard Deviation 22,113 Count 14 Confidence Level(95.0%) 12,768
Too few to quantify Administrative Associate -2 Associate Professor Graphic Artist Interactivity Designer / Art Director Instructional Designer Instructional Designer Media Technician Systems Developer / Engineer
Summary
Problems with this survey Sample size too small
14 Directors 12 Managers 8 Coordinators 22 Consultants / Specialists
Assignment of positions to above categories was arbitrary (See notes on position pages)
Recommendations NMC’s should work together to establish
classifications and descriptions for common positions.
We should seek to know how people with the same skills are paid, outside of Education, so we can avoid losing good people because of salary issues.
This presentation and associated summary data is on the web at
http://www.princeton.edu/~daveh/nmcss2001