19
Coverage Gap Discount Program Invoicing and Disputes Mark Newsom Director, Division of Payment Reconciliation, Medicare Plan Payment Group March 16, 2012

Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at the IIR Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Division\'s 4th Annual Government Programs Summit on the Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program.

Citation preview

Page 1: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Coverage Gap Discount Program Invoicing and Disputes

Mark Newsom

Director, Division of Payment Reconciliation, Medicare Plan Payment Group

March 16, 2012

Page 2: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Coverage Gap Discount Process

Page 3: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Prescription Drug Events (PDEs)

Are submitted by Part D plan sponsors.

On each PDE, the plan reports the actual amount of gap discount paid for the dispensing event in the Reported Gap Discount field.

PDE submissions are subjected to a rigorous set of over 150 edits.

Page 4: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Cumulative Accepted PDE Processing Trends 01/01/12 - 01/21/12

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

Mil

lio

ns

Page 5: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

More Details on PDE Submission

Available at

www.mcoservice.com

Page 6: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Manufacturer Quarterly Invoice Process

CMS aggregates Gap Discount amounts reported on PDE data and performs a validation analysis.

CMS then sends this information to Palmetto GBA, the Third Party Administrator (TPA) for the CGDP.

The TPA sends quarterly invoice reports to manufacturers and Part D sponsors simultaneously.

Manufacturers are required to pay the invoiced amount in full to the Part D sponsors within 38 days of report distribution.

Page 7: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Count of PDEs Invoiced by Quarter, 2011

136,000

1,706,000 4,675,000

19,555,000

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

Rounded to the nearest thousand

Page 8: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

2011 Invoiced Amounts by Quarter

Rounded to the nearest thousand

$50,687,000

$174,106,000 $394,864,000

$1,556,676,000

Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

Page 9: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Dispute Resolution

Manufacturers have the right to dispute invoices within 60 days of receipt.

CMS will deny disputes if the discount payment is accurately calculated based upon accurate data for dispensing events that actually occurred.

Page 10: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Q1 – Q3 Dispute Volume, 2011

2,383

58,827

131,731

Q1 Q2 Q3

Page 11: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Dispute Reasons

DISPUTE REASON CODE DISPUTE REASON DESCRIPTION

D01 Duplicate Invoice Item

D02 Closed Pharmacy

D03 Not PART D Covered Drug

D04 Excessive Quantity

D05 Invalid Days Supply

D06 High Price of the Drug

D07 Last Lot Expiration Date

D08 Early Fill

D09 Marketing Category is not NDA or BLA

D10 Date of Service prior to 01/01/2011

D11 PDE improperly invoiced beyond Manufacturer Agreement Invoice period

D12 Invalid Prescription Service Reference Number

D99 Other

Page 12: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Q1 – Q3 Disputes by Reason Code, 2011

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Q1 % Q2 % Q3 %

D03 - Not PART D Covered Drug D09 - Marketing Category is not NDA or BLA

D04 - Excessive Quantity All others

D01 - Duplicate Invoice Item

Page 13: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Denied and Upheld Disputes

To date, 99% of disputes have been denied.

Most of the upheld disputes have been in the “Excessive Quantity” category.

Page 14: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Disputes Should Be Based Upon Part D Policy Only

www.cms.gov/PrescriptionDrugCovContra/12_PartDManuals.asp#TopOfPage

Page 15: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Part D Benefit Designs

2012 Defined Standard Benefit for Applicable Drugs

Page 16: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Part D Benefit Designs (cont.)

The defined standard (DS) benefits is used my only around 10% of Prescription Drug Plans.

Other benefit designs may: Substitute the DS co-insurance, with tiered co-pay structures tied to plan formularies or preferred pharmacies in a plan’s network.

May have reduced deductible or a modification to the initial coverage limit.

May, for an additional premium, have reduce cost sharing and/or have coverage of non-Part D drugs.

Page 17: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Common Reasons CMS Denies Disputes

Duplicate Invoice Item: Most disputes of duplicates have turned out to be a situation where an adjustment to a previously invoiced PDE has been submitted. This is not a true duplicate.

Closed Pharmacy: Edits are performed on PDEs to confirm that a pharmacy was open on the Date of Service (DOS) based up0n NCPDP data. We have observed instability in the data where a pharmacy is reported as closed then later that information is corrected to show a continuous open period. Because of this, CMS allows a six month grace period following the DOS.

Page 18: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Reasons CMS Denies Disputes(cont.)

Not Part D Covered Drug: Often incorrectly disputed as Medicare Part B versus Part D.

Excessive Quantity and Days Supply: These types of disputes should represent inappropriate amounts not clinically acceptable variations from the label.

High Price of the Drug: Part D negotiated prices are not specifically connected to common list prices or prices from other government programs.

Maximum Gap Discount Disputes: Often calculated based on a defined standard benefit, but most Part D plans use other benefit designs.

Page 19: Newsom Cgdp Invoice And Disputes

Reasons CMS Denies Disputes(cont.)

340B Pharmacy Disputes: Part D sponsors may include 340B pharmacies in their networks. The Part D negotiated price is not necessarily the 340B pharmacy acquisition cost.

Marketing Category is Not NDA or BLA and Last Lot Expiration Date: We have found disputes here that are not tied to the actual FDA e-listing as of the date of service for the PDE. Retroactive listing changes will not impact PDEs invoiced before the changes were made.