14
exit left An information bulletin on developments within the European Union for the labour and trade union movement www.no2eu.com Summer 2013

No2eudoc

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

New publication Exit Left from the No2EU campaign

Citation preview

Page 1: No2eudoc

exit leftAn information bulletin on developments

within the European Union for thelabour and trade union movement

www.no2eu.com

Summer 2013

Page 2: No2eudoc

3

Eurozone unemployment in April 2013 hit a record12.1% (10.9% across EU27) up from 12.0% in Februaryaccording to Eurostat, the EU statistical office.

That’s 26,521 million men and women – 1 in 8 workers -unemployed in the EU.

This terrible toll is an indictment of EU treaties,structures and policies designed to drive down wages,pensions and benefits by boosting unemployment toincrease ‘competitiveness’. It is also an alarm call to thelabour and trade union movement to reject the emptyillusion of the cynically misnamed ‘Social Europe’ andbuild a progressive alternative to the EU.

The EU’s lowest unemployment rates were in Austria(4.7%) and Germany (5.4%); the highest in Greece(27.2% in January), Spain (26.7%) and Portugal (17.5%).This disparity shows the EU’s anti-social reality – an

economic straitjacket to boost German capitalism at theexpense of weaker economies. As always in capitalistcrises, the working class in these EU member states arepaying the price through poverty, humiliation, despairand emigration.

Year-on-year Eurozone male unemployment rose to11.9% but female unemployment rose even more from11.3% to 12.2% in the Eurozone and 10.4% to 11.0% inthe EU27.

Youth unemployment was a staggering 23.5% in theEU27 (24.0% Eurozone). The lowest rates were inGermany and Austria (both 7.6%) and the Netherlands(10.5%) and the highest in Greece (59.1% in January2013), Spain (55.9%), Italy (38.4%) and Portugal(38.3%).

EU unemployment soars By Alex Gordon

Page 3: No2eudoc

Margaret Thatcher may have passed on, butThatcherism is alive and destroying public servicesacross the European Union, writes RMT generalsecretary Bob Crow

The cult of monetarist economics is enshrined in EUtreaties. A major part of this cult believes that cuttingbudget deficits and imposing harsh austerity is an end initself and mass unemployment and economic declineare a ‘price worth paying’ for curbing democracy andtrade union power.

Unemployment in the euro zone is at a record 12 percent, and the Eurozone economy is shrinking. But all EUmember state governments stick with endless austerity.

This means wage cuts and dismantling public servicesbefore handing them to the private sector that createdthe economic mess in the first place. The fact that itdoesn’t work is irrelevant to the EU austerity cult.

Even the International Monetary Fund admits thatspending cuts in deeply depressed economies actuallyaccelerates economic decline.

It is clear that Greece, Spain, Cyprus and the rest needinvestment not more austerity and savage cuts toessential public services but, locked in the Eurozone,their only option is exactly that.

What’s more the EU sees this as the perfect opportunityto speed up the privatisation drive. This process of firingoff diktats demanding mass privatisation with no publicmandate whatsoever is not confined to the transportsector where EU transport commissioner, Siim Kallas isdemanding the break up of all publicly owned railways.

Across the EU health care, education and every otherpublic service face the same EU business model ofprivatisation.

So what happened to ‘Social Europe’? For years certainleaders of the labour movement claimed that Europewould deliver everything from full employment, decentpublic services, improved pensions to even betterweather, but it turned out to be a fairy tale.

General secretary of the European Trade UnionConfederation, Bernadette Ségol, has said that presentEU policies have failed.

Addressing the theme of Social Europe, she points outthat “policies that are being implemented are attackingindustrial relations system, are putting pressure onwages, are weakening public services and weakeningsocial protection.

“These are the core aspects of the social model,”confirming the view of many observers that the model isnow dead - if indeed it was ever alive at all.

The Lisbon Treaty and all the other EU treaties are amanifesto for ‘free-market’ capitalism, which deliberatelyrule out any other economic system. They are designedby an alliance of transnational corporations without anyinconvenient hindrances of real democracy, since theEU’s institutions are entirely undemocratic.

This constitution now has spin offs including the StabilityMechanism and Fiscal Pact to hand tax and publicpolicy to private capital so that exploitation can beincreased whilst binning employment conditions,collective bargaining, pensions, social protection andaccountability.

But Parliaments and governments do not have to carryout policies dictated by Brussels. Instead, they couldcarry out measures on behalf of those who elect them.

The only rational way in which genuinely popular,democratic policies could be implemented however, is ifdemocratically-elected governments vote to leave theEU to take control of their own currency, taxation andpublic procurement policies and to exercise their powerto decide on behalf of the peoples of that countryincluding the right to decent public services.

EU attacks public services

4

Page 4: No2eudoc

Coalition government NHS changes are a preparationfor a corporate, US/EU Free Trade Agreement.

David Cameron flagged the trade deal as a UK priority inchairing the G8 in 2013. The Health and Social CareBill’s relationship to this international investment contextis not widely understood.

In 2010 Trade Commission personnel admitted thathealth would be first to be ‘harmonised’. Since then theHealth and Social Care Bill has prepared the UK sectorfor transnational health investors.

Transforming the NHS into a cash cow for transnationalinvestors is a model of how to give transnationalcorporations rights to take over a globally respecteduniversal health service. The financial service industryrequires same or better treatment to national companiesand the right to sue governments in an internationaljurisdiction if it tries to limit or regulate expected futureprofits.

This changes the whole emphasis of health care. Therights of transnational corporations become the priorityand health becomes primarily a legally enforceable tradeissue.

Trade agreements are usually conducted very secretlybut David Cameron, led by the financial service industryhas emphasised the US/EU Free Trade Agreement –though not what it involves.

Yet despite this, media have failed to analyse orquestion what privatisation in the context of aninternational free trade agreement means for the futureof the NHS.

There is a job to be done to disseminate information,report and analyse the implications of the US/EU FreeTrade Agreement, so not just the perspective oftransnational capital from the BBC Business Unit ispresented. The nationwide concern about the NHScould be the means for a strong, clear and concertedpublic voice for workers or public service users on this.

The juggernaut of the trade deal backed by businessvoice propaganda is unlikely to be questionedotherwise.

A lack of public information on the broader internationaltrade context of NHS changes is grounds for the Healthand Social Care Bill to be repealed. The OppositionLabour Party needs to call for this.

US/EU trade deal threatens NHS

5

By Linda Kaucher

www.sochealth.co.uk/2013/02/09/the-real-story-behind-the-nhs-changes-the-useu-free-trade-agreement/

[email protected]

Page 5: No2eudoc

EU transport commissioner Siim Kallas proposed a 4thEU rail liberalisation package in January 2013 to breakup nationalised railways and hand them to the privatesector.

The EU proposals will force competitive tendering for railcontracts and will abolish nationalised, publicly-ownedrail services.

The unelected EU Commission wants full separation (asimposed in Britain by Tories with EU directives) betweenfirms that own rail infrastructure and train operators.

But Germany has long resisted attempts to break upDeutsche Bahn, which took over freight sectors ofDutch and Danish national railways (now DB SchenkerRail Nederland and DSB goods in Denmark) as well as

EWS in Britain amongst others.

Following political pressure from Berlin and Paris, Kallashad to retreat from breaking up vertically integratedrailways, but is banning cross-subsidy of trainoperations.

As a result last month Germany allowed UK transportprivatiser, National Express (stripped of its East Coastmainline franchise in 2009) to capture two 15-yearregional rail contracts from DB covering the cities ofCologne and Bonn.

That deal is a rare reversal of the trend that saw DB'sArriva division run services in Wales, as well as ChilternRailways and CrossCountry.

EU demands rail privatisationacross europe

6

EU rail ‘liberalisation’ - dangerous fragmentation, private cartelsand huge fare increases

Page 6: No2eudoc

7

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said:

“This model of forcing competition in rail created thebasket case we suffer in Britain today. Now they want itacross Europe to boost profits for private monopolies.

“You don’t have to be Hercule Poirot to work out thatthe chaos of rail privatisation that ripped through Britainwill sweep across the continent courtesy of the bossesand bankers that run the EU.”

Dutch Socialist Party MEP Dennis de Jong warned thatunder the proposals the whole of the Dutch rail networkwould have to be put out to tender in 2019.

He said the EU wants to open the entire rail sector tocommercial operators.

“The Commission’s plans derive directly from the 1990s,with what we know now we can see that theseproposals are completely outdated,” he said.

The European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF)denounced compulsory competitive tendering for railpublic passenger transport services and so-called openaccess competition demanded by the package.

Many unions argue that “unbundling” ignores theunavoidable link that exists between rail and track,which allows integrated companies to deliver betterpunctuality, communication and passenger service.

Democratically accountable public companies candeliver long-term investment, innovation and promotedevelopment of infrastructure and rolling stock.

However an EU official dismissed criticism of theirbusiness model for rail. “In the early days, a lot of thingswere done wrong, but that’s all in the past now,” hesaid.

Unions are campaigning across Europe to stop the neo-liberal proposals being rubber-stamped by memberstates and the consultative European parliament.

Page 7: No2eudoc

8

“The credit system, focussed in the so-called nationalbanks and the big money-lenders and usurerssurrounding them, constitutes enormous centralisation,and gives to this class of parasites the fabulous power,not only to periodically despoil industrial capitalists, butalso to interfere in actual production in a mostdangerous manner…”

Karl Marx - Capital Volume Three (Chapter XXXIII)

From bank bailouts in Greece which caused massunemployment and immiseration not seen since theNazi occupation to bank bail-ins in Cyprus.

The small island of Cyprus, a divided ex-British colonywith around one million Greek Cypriots and a massiveBritish military base was an offshore tax haven forRussian oligarchs. The ongoing break up of theEurozone, saw capital controls re-introduced in Cyprus,initially as a “temporary” measure, but as with all Troikameasures soon to become permanent. What effect willthey have on the Cypriot working class?

The EU’s bank heist in Cyprus was first a 10% tax on allbank deposits, but after the Cypriot Parliament ‘No’vote, only on deposits in excess of €100k. Limits wereplaced on withdrawals of deposits below this figure,which would take someone a year to withdraw the‘guaranteed’ deposit at €300 per day.

The official line was that Cyprus had 8 times too manyforeign deposit holders, given its GDP. The fact thatLuxembourg has a ratio of around 20 times raises aquestion as to whether Cyprus was selected by theEurogroup to warn Greece what happens if it goesagainst the EG.

Two Cypriot banks, Laiki and Bank of Cyprus wereforced to close by the ECB winding down liquidity(credit).

In the Greek crisis, the corporate mass media blamed‘lazy Greek workers’ as the excuse to bring in massiveanti-working class attacks; in Cyprus Russian Oligarchswere the excuse, while all Cypriots were heldresponsible (i.e. anyone and everyone with a bankaccount) for the banking collapse. Thus we saw theobscene spectacle of the banks closed for two weeks,the longest time anywhere since WW2, whilst people atthe top shifted their money out through Cypriot bankoutlets based in the UK.

Cypriot politicians voted NO to the EU’s raid on Cypriotbank accounts in order to ‘save’ banks by blockingaccess to accounts. This political charade continuedwhen Finance Minister, Sarris flew to Moscow to‘negotiate’ when in reality his relatives shifted theirmoney abroad!

These politicians agreed to bankrupt Cyprus and handover all gas exploration rights to foreign multinationals;the Russians no longer have a look in, so the strugglenow is between US and German firms. So little Cyprushas re-entered a dark, neo-colonial financial meltdownand the coming attacks will be immense:

• GDP estimated to fall by a minimum 8% (morethan 100,000 Cypriots were employed in financialservices of one sort or another and the recentcost of the bailout has increased from €17B to€23B);

• €70 million in new property taxes;

• Business tax up from 10% to 12.5%;

• 4.5% wage cuts up to €1k per month;

• 6.5% wage cuts up to €1.5k per month;

• 8.5% wage cuts up to €2k per month;

• Slashing public services;

• Privatisations to bring in €1.4billion from 2013-16;

• VAT increased from 17% to 19%

The current mythology perpetrated by the rulingeconomic terrorists is that these measures will lead tosome type of future growth. If Greece is anything to goby this growth has only been in suicides, massunemployment and depression: nothing else.

These policies are a ‘beggar thy neighbour’ approach bythe ECB to keep the most indebted banks likeDeutschebank standing whilst everyone else is bled dry.

Cyprus was chosen on Greek Independence Day(March 25) as a warning to Greece: swallow what theTroika throws at you otherwise the ‘Cyprus Option’ willhit your banks as well.

The EU is aiming to destroy the social fabric of oursociety with the aim of buying up the island for apittance after turning the population into scavengers.How the Cypriot population reacts will determine the realfate of these measures over the coming period.

Cyprus: An EU financial coupBy VN Gelis

Page 8: No2eudoc

9

Page 9: No2eudoc

10

Contrary to popular myth Margaret Thatcher spent mostof her political career supporting the transformation ofthe then Common Market into today's European Union.

It is one of life's ironies that much of the left hascontinued to support this neoliberal project long afterher U-turn in the now famous Eurosceptic Brugesspeech.

But the fact remains that Thatcher was one of thearchitects of the 1987 Single European Act, the treatywhich gave us EU militarisation, the single market andthe single currency.

Boosting the Thatcher myth, many fawning eulogiespoint to the Bruges speech in 1988 which attacked thecoming EU centralisation she had done so much toconstruct.

The speech was not only too little too late but it gave theEU more ammunition to present itself as vaguelyprogressive to the labour movement - vaguely being theoperative word.

Former European Commission president JacquesDelors's mendacious address to the TUC Congress inBournemouth that year, offering full employment and

The house that Thatcher builtBy Brian Denny

Page 10: No2eudoc

11

mandatory collective bargaining across Europe, duped ageneration of trade union leaders into believing thatBrussels was "the only game in town."

At this pivotal moment the foundation stones of newLabour and Blairism were being laid as delegates pitifullysang "Frère Jacques."

So what was the Iron Lady's true role in "Europeanconstruction"?

Arch-Europhile and Tory prime minister Edward Heathbrought Thatcher into his government in before hedragged this country into the then Common Market in1973.

In the 1975 referendum, Thatcher campaigned to keepthis country in "Europe" before she ousted Heath tobecome leader of the Conservative Party in opposition.

One of the first things she did when she became primeminister in 1979 was to remove all controls on capital,as demanded by the European Community treaties.

Her successive administrations fell into line with theneeds of the EU and the finance sector by deindustrial-ising the country, shutting down the steel and coalindustries and eroding the manufacturing base, whichled to mass unemployment paid for by squanderingrevenues from North Sea oil.

By 1983 the newly formed European Round Table ofIndustrialists, made up of major global corporations,launched plans to deregulate European economies toallow big business to grab more industries in order toextract profit.

To make this a reality former Irish foreign secretaryJames Dooge chaired the secret Dooge committee ofthe European Community in 1985. It prepared theground for the Single European Act and the MaastrichtTreaty. Malcolm Rifkind was Thatcher's appointee to thiscommittee.

These plans formed the basis of the Single EuropeanAct and set the ideological framework for all treaties thatfollowed. In the proposals Lord Cockfield pushedthrough over 250 measures to remove barriers to tradeby qualified majority voting.

As Thatcher herself put it, "We wished to have manydirectives under majority voting because things whichwe wanted were being stopped by others using a singlevote."

Another Tory involved was the young John Bercow, lateran MP and now Speaker of the House of Commons.

He said: "Margaret Thatcher was herself a driving forcebehind the Act and some of her ministers positivelyfizzed with enthusiasm about the single market, whichthey believed achieved the Thatcherisation of Europe."

This was followed by Thatcher's infamous "big bang"deregulation of the banks and the City, marking thelaunch of a rapacious and profoundly corrupt casinoeconomy that has led us to the current crisis ofcapitalism.

By the late 1980s all Thatcher's hard work led to thelaunch of plans for the Maastricht Treaty, designed tofurther centralise powers to the EU.

It was at this point that she turned on the monster shehad done so much to create. She opposed the fall ofthe Berlin Wall as she understood the power arevanchist, reunited Germany could wield.

Tory Europhiles quickly moved against her, kicking herout "like a dog in the night," in November 1990 asDennis Skinner put it.

Europhile John Major replaced her as Tory leader,forcing through Maastricht and among other things theprivatisation of the railways - under EU directive 91/440.

Page 11: No2eudoc

12

David Cameron's government wants to form an“advance guard” of economically liberal EU countries toforce open the single market in services, reported theFinancial Times recently.

He made the call after Nigel Lawson, former ToryChancellor called for Britain to quit the EU just days afterUKIP secured about 25 per cent of the votes in theseats it contested in local elections.

Cameron insisted he could make Europe more 'flexibleand competitive' by reopening the process for aEuropean Services Directive, which he hopes wouldpersuade business interests to campaign for a vote tostay in the EU in his proposed 2017 referendum.

The idea would split countries like Britain, Sweden, theNetherlands, Spain and Poland – with governmentspromoting export of services such as finance, whichsigned a “pro-growth” letter in 2012 – from thoseresisting further liberalisation of the trade in services.

France previously resisted reforms to the servicesmarket, while Germany with its dominant manufacturingsector has been prioritised opening up the single marketin goods rather than in services.

This latest Tory proposal would allow a group of at leastnine countries to pursue deeper integration on a policyinitiated by the European Commission. The mechanismis already being used in divorce law, patents and – mostcontroversially – a financial transactions tax.

Open Europe, the neoliberal business lobby group,attributes the idea originally to Mark Rutte, Netherlandsprime minister, who floated the concept of a liberal avantgarde group in 2011. It has also been backed by theSwedish moderate party.

The aim would be to fully implement the existingservices directive and to apply the “country of originprinciple” – where exporting services companies operateunder the law of the country in which they are based –to promote trade in services.

If Britain, the Netherlands and other economically liberalgovernments form an advance guard, it could put thenext European Commission – whose mandate begins in2015 – under pressure to put measures on the table toopen the market by resurrecting the so-called'Bolkestein' directive to liberalise services throughout theEU.

Bolkestein revisited

The Communist Party of Portugal has called for thecountry to leave the euro immediately.

Portuguese communists argue there is a radical incom-patibility between 'remaining in the euro and theadoption of alternative, patriotic and left wing policies.

PCP general secretary Jerónimo de Sousa said thatwhile leaving the euro was a necessary condition for thedevelopment of the sovereign country, it is not enoughon its own.

"The aim is to ensure, as part of leaving the euro, thatwe create a political alternative capable of ensuring thecountry's development and minimize the costs that thisoption might entail,” he said.

He stressed that the party's position could not beconfused with those who, while they claim to be leftist,see no other solution other than to "perpetuatemembership of the euro and to deepen federalism in theEuropean Union'.

Economist John Ferreira do Amaral said that only in thisway would the country recover the tools it needs fordevelopment, including the exchange rate - "anessential tool to encourage sectors producing tradeablegoods' - and the issue of their own currency.

He said it was essential to prevent "internal bankruptcy'and to 'manage leaving the euro in order to defendfamilies who are in debt".

PCP central committee member Agostinho Lopesstressed that the euro "is a project that has not failed inits objectives". Rather, it guaranteed "political decisionswere and will be the choice of big European capital" ..."and the dominant powers of Europe in the context ofcapitalist integration, in the proceedings of the class thatis the European Union".

Also José Lourenço, a member of the Committee forEconomic Affairs of the PCP, denounced the politicalnature of the euro, calling it a "tool for the exploitation ofworkers and peoples, and the deepening of theconditions of return on capital". Remembering thattoday the eurozone countries not only were becoming"an increasingly unequal economic form" the economistreaffirmed the inalienable right of the Portuguese peopleto decide their own destiny. In his opinion, the impact ofexit from the euro would be minimised if it involvescountries other than ours, namely Spain and France.

Portuguese CP calls for Euro exit

Page 12: No2eudoc

13

Trust in EU at all-time lowNew Eurobarometer figures reveal trust in the EU hasfallen to record levels in its six biggest member states.Between May 2007 and November 2012 the proportionof people saying they tended not to trust the EU as aninstitution increased from 18% to 42% in Poland, from28% to 53% in Italy, from 41% to 56% in France, from36% to 59% in Germany, from 49% to 69% in the UKand from 23% to 72% in Spain.

FranceUnemployment in France rose to 3,224,600 (almost11%) in March, exceeding the previous record inJanuary 1997. The French Senate approved ‘flexibleemployment’ measures, part of President Hollande'splan to restore ‘competitiveness’. Senators voted 168-33 for the law, which allows firms to reduce workforcecosts more easily in a downturn.

77% of French believe European integration hasweakened the economy. According to a Pew Researchsurvey only 41% of French had a favourable opinion ofthe EU, down from 60% in 2012. Even in EuroscepticBritain 43% have a favourable view of the EU. The FTwrote: “No European country is becoming moredispirited and disillusioned faster than France”.

ItalyItalian banking system is suffering the worst creditcrunch in history, the Italian Banking Association hassaid, with bank loans down by 2.12% in March 2013. LaRepubblica newspaper reports bad loans in bankportfolios reached €64.3bn in March 2013, rising 4.3%from March 2012 and by 33% on the previous month.Italian industrial production fell by 5.2% in March 2013compared to March 2012, the worst performance in theeurozone. The Italian property market fell in 2012 to thelowest level since 1985.

SpainThe German government is demanding more labourmarket reforms, prescribing further labour marketliberalisation in Italy and loosening "rigidities" in Greekand Spanish job markets. Spain's right wing PM,Mariano Rajoy told a press conference he has nointention of reforming Spain's labour laws further asdemanded by the European Commission and Germany.Spain’s two main Parties, PP and PSOE have lostrespectively half (44% to 22%) and a third (30% to 20%)of their electoral support since mid-2011, mostly to thebenefit of the two minor national-level parties, leftist IUand centrist UPyD.

EU crisis round-up

Page 13: No2eudoc

EU crisis round up continued

14

GreeceGreek unemployment rates soared to new record highs:youth unemployment hit 64.4%, the working ageunemployment rate went up from 26.7% to 27%. It isGreece’s sixth year of recession. PM Antonis Samaras'sgovernment threatened teachers with arrest if they goon strike. It is the third time this year that the Greekgovernment has invoked emergency fascist-era laws toforce strikers back to work, also threatening seafarersand railworkers earlier The teachers’ union says thatabout 10,000 part-time teachers could be dismissedonce their temporary contracts expire. It called for a 24-hour strike when exams start on May 17 and rollingstrikes.

PortugalIn Portugal, unemployment reached 17.7% in the firstquarter of 2013, up from 16.9% in Q4 last year andrising at the fastest pace ever, according to DiarioEconomico. Unemployment is expected to continue toclimb with public sector workers due to be laid off and arecovery in the export sector too weak to offset the fallin domestic demand.

UK outvoted over EU budgetEU finance ministers agreed to provide an extra €7.3bnin additional funding for the 2013 annual EU budget,despite the UK, Finland and the Netherlands votingagainst. The UK’s share of the additional funding will bearound €1bn, although this could increase further as theCommission has requested a total of €11.2bn. DutchFinance Minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem argued that itwould necessitate greater cutbacks in Dutch domesticspending.

Germany German Chancellor Angela Merkel has called for greaterefforts to attract skilled workers from poor crisis-struckeurozone countries to Germany, noting that "We are aEuropean internal market, and we will certainly need todevelop much more mobility in the labour market".

Lafontaine calls for return of

national currenciesFormer German Left Party chair and ex-Finance Minister,Oskar Lafontaine, has called for reintroduction ofnational currencies alongside the euro. He said hesupported the Euro in the past as he believed it wouldcoordinate economic policies of member countries,especially wage policies. "Unfortunately, this has notoccurred," he said.

Page 14: No2eudoc

www.no2eu.com

Useful websites

www.euobserver.com

www.caef.org.uk

www.democracymovement.org.uk

www.people.ie

www.nationalplatform.org

www.german-foreign-policy.com

www.openeurope.org.uk

www.eulobbytours.org

These are all good sources of information but No2EU does notnecessarily agree with all material posted on these websites