Upload
hilary-hopkins
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits
Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto,Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai
RIKEN Frontier Research SystemNEC Fundamental Research Laboratories
Outline
• The Josephson charge qubit
• Single-shot readout with charge trap
• Measurements of energy relaxation
• Charge fluctuators and energy relaxation
The Josephson Charge Qubit
b
g
C
ennU
2
2 22
Charging energy (for Cooper pair):
Josephson energy: EJ
EJ
Cb >> Cg
E
ng =Vg Cg /e
Reservoir
BoxCb
Cg
2e2
Cb
Control gate
ng =VgCg
e
Degeneracy
>> kT
2e2
Cb
>> EJ
0 2 31 4
The Hamiltonian
sincos2 xz
EH
C
neU g
2222
JEUE E
EJ
tan
2/sin
2/cos
2
E
2/cos
2/sin
2
E
Eigenstates
Eigenenergies
|0
|1 2
10t = 0:
t > 0: 2/2/
2
1 titi JJ ee
2/sin12/cos0 tit JJ
2
cos11
tP J
Coherent Oscillations
J
J
E
P
t
1
0
E
t
|12
|12
-pulse: J t =
q
EJ
0
1
2
3
4
01234
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
1
2
3
4
0 10 20 30
I 1
(pA
) I 2
(pA
)
I 1 (p
A)
I 2 (p
A)
t (ns)
13.4 GHz
9.1 GHz
f (GHz)
Cooper-Pair BoxCooper-Pair BoxCooper-Pair BoxCooper-Pair Box
GateGateGateGate
SQUIDSQUIDSQUIDSQUID
Probe Probe JunctionJunctionProbe Probe
JunctionJunction
1m
Probe Probe JunctionJunctionProbe Probe
JunctionJunction
Cooper-Cooper-pair Boxpair BoxCooper-Cooper-pair Boxpair Box
GateGateGateGate
SQUIDSQUIDSQUIDSQUID
Al/AlOAl/AlOxx/Al tunnel junctions/Al tunnel junctionsAl/AlOAl/AlOxx/Al tunnel junctions/Al tunnel junctions
Pulse induced current in SQUID – box – probe junction
circuit is measured
0+1 I = 2e ||2/Tr
Tr
Control pulse sequence
t (ns)0 1
2e
Cooper-pair box
JE
qp1 JE
Final state read-out
A pair of qusiparticles tunnels through the probe junction biased to Vb 2/e
CC EeVE 322
ee
qp1
qp2
+ probe
Single-shot Readout
Coherent oscillations
Quasiparticle tanneling (when the trap is biased to 2/e)
Reservoir
Box
Control gate
qubit
CbCts
SET
Readout circuit
Cs
I
Cbt
Trap
Readout gate
Ct
t
readout:
control:
Pulses
C
C
C
C C
s t
b t
s
b t
S E T
Tr a pR e s e r v o ir
R ea dou t g a te
S E T g a te
C on tro l ga te
B o x
1 m
Tra
p ga
te
Bo
x ga
te
• Measurement circuit is electrostatically decoupled from the qubit
• Final states are read out after termination coherent state manipulation
Reservoir
Box
SET
Trap
gate
Readout with control -pulses
0 5 10 15 200
100
2000
4
I SE
T (
pA
)
t (ms)
11 Q
t(e)
1 11 1 0 1 0 1
tot
switch
N
NP 1
Readout pulse
Control -pulse
ng
I
0.0 0.2 0.40.00.20.40.60.81.0
P
tc (ns)
0 .8
0 .1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
t (ns)
b
P
Quantum Oscillations
q
(e)
= /
-pulse
0 2 4 6 80.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
P
tc (ns)
Degeneracy
Crossectiont
q
0 500 1000 1500 20000
50
100
150
200
250
N (
coun
ts)
t delay (ns)
Relaxation to the reservoir
Readout
td
Control -pulse
220 exp(-t/288)+32
T1res = 288 ns
Ntot = 327
Reservoir
Box
SET
Trap
Relaxation to the Trap
0 100 200 300 400 5000
50
100
150
200
250
300
N (
coun
ts)
t width (ns)
Control -pulse
twidth
Teff = (1/T1res + 1/T1
trap)-1 = 31 ns
ReadoutReservoir
Box
SET
Trap
90.031288
2881
11
11
nsns
ns
TT
TP
restrap
res
Readout efficiency
0 500 1000 1500 20000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
P
t delay (ns)
0 2000 4000 6000 80000.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
P
t (ps)
N0+ N Exp[-t/] N
0 = 152
= 5380 ps
90.000 P
Reservoir
Box
SET
Trap
Two-level Systemas a Quantum Noise Spectrometer
Two-level systemTLS
Environment
zxz tUE
H sincos2
Electrostatic energy noise
Charge basis:
Eigenbasis:
tan = EJ
E
U
EJ
U
z
x
transitions
dephasing
Dephasing Transitions
U
U22 UEE J
sincos2
xzz tUE
H
E
Charge qubit q charge noise spectral density: Sq()
deqqS iq 0
2
1SU() = (2e/C)2Sq()
1 = 22
SU()Relaxation rate: sin2
Dephasing: 1
0
2
2
2
cos
dSU
SU
Dephasing
RelaxationExcitation
0 100 200 300 400 5000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
P
ta (ns)
T1 time measurements
ng
E
0
1
0 1
ta
P(1) exp(-ta/T1)
time
timereadout pulse
Control -pulse Adiabatic pulse
0 1 2 3 4 5
10
100
T1 (
ns)
Vp (V)
Degeneracy
T1 time vs Gate Voltage
10
100
100 50 0 -50
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4
T1 (
ns)
B = 8 Gs (Ej = 3.7 GHz) B = 5 Gs (Ej = 6.0 GHz) B = 0 Gs (Ej = 8.1 GHz)
E (GHz)
qg (e)
15 20 25 30 351E-3
0.01
0.1
1
E = 400 eV (off degeneracy)
(
ns-1
)
EJ (eV)
E = EJ (degenercy)
~E2
J
EJ-dependences
Degeneracy
Off degeneracy
C
C
C
C C
s t
b t
s
b t
S E T
Tr a pR e s e r v o ir
R ea dou t g a te
S E T g a te
C on tro l ga te
B o x
1 m
Tra
p ga
te
Bo
x ga
te
Coupling to Environment through Electrical Leads
Coupling to gates:
3107.1600
1 aF
aF
C
C
b
g
Coupling to SET:
31051000600
10030
aFaF
aFaF
CC
CC
tb
tsbt
Measured relaxation time can not be explained by coupling to the external environment through electrical leads
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5
107
108
Readout SET normally in ON state OFF state
(
s-1)
q (e)
Effect of the measurement SET
1 10 100107
108
109
SE/22 (
s-1)
(GHz)
c
1/f
f
The noise derived from 1 time
mKk
T cc 100
1 = 22
SU(0)
sin2
dt
St U
2
2
2 2/sin2cos
0
ExpI
2
2ln 2
2
21 tCe
ExpI
CeT
2ln 12
2
2
2
2T
tExpI
T2-2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
I
t (ps)
I = I1(1-cos(t)exp(-(t/T
2)2/2))-I
0
T2 = 300 ps
Classical Quantum Noise
Quantum f-noise ( > 0): Classical 1/f-noise:
(kTeff)2
Do low frequency 1/f and high frequency f noises have common origin?
1/f
f
SU()
kT/ emissionabsorption
Relaxation through Fluctuators
• Dephasing is caused by 1/f noise of charge fluctuators with activation energy less than kT
• Fluctuators with activation energy of ( >> kT) accept qubit excess energy
kTE
fSq 2
1 10 10010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
Si (
pA
2 /Hz)
f (Hz)
3x10-2pA2/Hz
Low frequency 1/f noise
Temperature dependences of the 1/f noise
1 10 10010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
Si (
pA
2 /Hz)
f (Hz)
3x10-2pA2/Hz
T=0.055K
1 10 100
10-3
10-2
10-1
Si (
pA
2 /Hz)
f (Hz)
8x10-2pA2/Hz
T=0.5K
1 10 10010-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
Si (
pA
2 /Hz)
f (Hz)
3x10-2pA2/Hz
T=0.9K
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
I (p
A)
Vg (V)
0.90 K 0.85 K 0.80 K 0.75 K 0.70 K 0.65 K 0.60 K 0.55 K 0.50 K 0.45 K 0.40 K 0.35 K 0.30 K 0.25 K 0.20 K 0.15 K 0.10 K 0.055 K
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
1
2
3
4
5
6
71/
2 (1
0-3e)
T (K)
EC = 110 eV
1/2 = 6x10-3eT
Standard qubit on 400 nm thick Si3N4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
2
4
6
8
10
12 current measurements
T2
*
= 13x10-3 eT
(
10-3
e)
T (K)
EC = 50 eV
CeT
2ln2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
I
t (ps)
I = I1(1-cos(t)exp(-(t/T
2)2/2))-I
0
T2 = 300 ps
1/f noise in superconducting – normal SETs
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
B = 0T B = 0.2T (normal)
= 17x10-3 eT
EC = 125 eV
(
10-3
e)
T (K)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
1
2
3
41/
2 (1
0-3 e
)
T (K)
EC = 110 eV
1/2=4x10-3 eT
GaAs
SET on GaAs substrate
SET on Al2O3
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
2
4
6
8
10
(
10-3
e)
T (K)
B = 0 (superconductivity) B = 0.4T (normal)
EC = 320 eV
1/2 = 7x10-3 eT
Si
Al Al2O3
SET island
Large area SETs
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
5
10
15
20
1/2 (
10
-3 e
)
T (K)
EC = 80 eV
Box: 3x2.3 m2
1/2= 43x10-3 eT
1/f noise properties from experiments
• does not depend on substrate type• noise appears in oxide of Al(?)• scales with SET size (area?)• saturation level at low temperatures depends on current
Basic properties of the 1/f noise caused by bistable fluctuators
22
,
s
0.1 1 100.1
1
10
S
2S
dsPS ,
kT
exp0
dPkT
dP
1P
S()
Qubit
TLS(fluctuators)
Environment at T > 0
Qubit island TLSfluctuators
C
eUq
2
The qubit is coupled to environment through charge degree of freedom
1/f noise
2313
12
3
Environment at T > 0
kT13
013 exp 031
kTDV ij
ijenijij 2coth1
2
12 2
022 2PkTqSq
kT13
012 exp
kT23
021 exp
high frequency cutoffof the 1/f noise
01312 , PP If , then
31
2
130
2 enDV
2221122112
21122112
14,,
s
0
23132112
0
2313 ,,, dsPS
k
kkV 1113
2
13
2
12
3
13231
31
11
ee
e
130
2
13
2 PV
130
2
13
2 ePV
Qubit relaxation (excitation)
22
22
qC
eV
2
22
C
eSq
02 40 PqSq
022 2PkTqSq
02 40 PqSq
kT
2
1/f low frequency noise: f high frequency noise:
Crossover frequency:
Same fluctuators contribute in the 1/f noise and the quantum f noise
Constant distribution of two energy parameters for the fluctuators is required
kT
exp0 d
kTd
021, PP 21
210
2210
ddPkTddP
02
0
23132112
0
0
2,, PkTdsPS
20
2, kT
AdsAS
AP
Two energy parameters:
Single energy:
Single energy (TLS)
12
1
2
Environment at T > 0
enDV 22
21 sin2
22sin
2coth1
2
kTDV ij
ijenij
0
High frequency cutoff
12
tan
C
eqV
2
A
P
1/f noise: << kT f noise:
< 105 Hz 1010 1011 Hz
Different TLS contribute in 1/f and f noises
Conclusion
We have demonstrated single-shot readout using charge trap
Energy relaxation of the qubit has been measured
The energy relaxation is caused by quantum f noise which has crossover frequency with 1/f noise at kT/
Nearly T2 dependence of the 1/f noise has been observed