Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

  • Upload
    rot

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    1/9

    Nonlinear free vibration of single-walled carbon nanotubes using nonlocalTimoshenko beam theory

    J. Yang a,n, L.L. Ke b,c, S. Kitipornchai b

    a School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australiab Department of Building and Construction, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR Chinac Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Beijing Jiaotong University, 100044 Beijing, PR China

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:Received 24 November 2009

    Received in revised form

    19 January 2010

    Accepted 19 January 2010Available online 25 January 2010

    Keywords:

    SWCNTs

    Nonlinear vibration

    Timoshenko beam theory

    Nonlocal elasticity

    DQ method

    a b s t r a c t

    Nonlinear free vibration of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) is studied in this paper based onvon Karman geometric nonlinearity and Eringens nonlocal elasticity theory. The SWCNTs are modeled

    as nanobeams where the effects of transverse shear deformation and rotary inertia are considered

    within the framework of Timoshenko beam theory. The governing equations and boundary conditions

    are derived by using the Hamiltons principle. The differential quadrature (DQ) method is employed to

    discretize the nonlinear governing equations which are then solved by a direct iterative method to

    obtain the nonlinear vibration frequencies of SWCNTs with different boundary conditions. Zigzag (5, 0),

    (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs are considered in numerical calculations and the elastic modulus is

    obtained through molecular mechanics (MM) simulation. A detailed parametric study is conducted to

    study the influences of nonlocal parameter, length and radius of the SWCNTs and end supports on the

    nonlinear free vibration characteristics of SWCNTs.

    & 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Nonlocal elasticity theory was proposed by Eringen [13] to

    consider the scale effect in elasticity by assuming the stress at a

    reference point to be a function of strain field at every point in the

    body. It has been extensively applied to analyze the bending,

    buckling, vibration and wave propagation of beam-like elements

    in micro- or nanoelectromechanical devices [413]. Sudak [14]

    studied infinitesimal column buckling of carbon nanotubes

    (CNTs), incorporating the van der Waals (vdW) forces and small

    scale effect, and showed that the critical axial strain decreases

    compared with the results of classical beams. Wang [15]

    discussed the molecular dispersion relationships for CNTs by

    taking into account the small scale effect. Wang and Hu [16]

    studied flexural wave propagation in a SWCNT by using thecontinuum mechanics and dynamic simulation. Lu et al. [17]

    investigated the wave propagation and vibration properties of

    single- or multi-walled CNTs based on nonlocal beam model.

    Wang et al. [18] presented analytical solutions for the free

    vibration of nonlocal Timoshenko beams. Reddy[19] developed

    nonlocal theories for EulerBernoulli, Timoshenko, Reddy, and

    Levinson beams. Analytical bending, vibration and buckling

    solutions are obtained which bring out the nonlocal effect on

    bending deformation, buckling load, and natural frequencies.More recently, Tounsi and his co-workers [2023] investigated

    the sound wave propagation in single- and double-walled CNTs

    taking into account the nonlocal effect, temperature and initial

    axial stress. Furthermore, they [24,25] derived the consistent

    governing equation of motion for the free vibration of fluid-

    conveying CNTs with nonlocal effect, which is an important

    application of nonlocal elastic theory in CNTs. Yang et al. [26]

    investigated the pull-in instability of nano-switches subjected to

    combined electrostatic and intermolecular forces within the

    framework of nonlocal elasticity theory. Aydogdu[27]presented

    a generalized nonlocal beam theory to study bending, buckling

    and free vibration of nanobeams.

    Previous theoretic and experimental investigations [28,29]

    showed that the deformation of nanostructures, such as CNTs, isnonlinear in nature when subjected to large external loads.

    Fu et al. [28] investigated the nonlinear free vibration of

    embedded multiwall CNTs considering inter-tube radial displace-

    ment and the related internal degrees of freedom. Shen and Zhang

    [30,31] considered the buckling and postbuckling behavior of

    single- and double-walled CNTs in thermal environments. Yan

    et al. [32]analyzed the nonlinear vibration characteristics of the

    fluid-filled DWNTs. To the best of authors knowledge, however,

    no previous work has been done concerning the small scale effect

    on the nonlinear vibration behavior of nanostructures.

    This paper makes the first attempt to study the nonlinear

    free vibration of SWCNTs based on von Karman geometric

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Contents lists available atScienceDirect

    journal homepage: www .elsevier.com/locate/physe

    Physica E

    1386-9477/$- see front matter& 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.physe.2010.01.035

    n Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 99256169; fax: +61 3 99256108.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Yang).

    Physica E 42 (2010) 17271735

    http://-/?-http://www.elsevier.com/locate/physehttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2010.01.035mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2010.01.035http://www.elsevier.com/locate/physehttp://-/?-
  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    2/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    nonlinearity, Timoshenko beam theory and Eringens nonlocal

    elasticity theory. The Hamiltons principle is employed to derive

    the governing equations and boundary conditions which are

    solved by using the differential quadrature (DQ) method. A direct

    iterative technique is then used to obtain the nonlinear vibration

    frequencies of nonlocal SWCNTs with different end supports. In

    numerical calculations, zigzag (5, 0), (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0)

    SWCNTs are considered and the elastic modulus is obtained by

    using MM simulation. The influences of nonlocal parameter,length and radius of the SWCNTs and end supports on the

    nonlinear free vibration characteristics of the SWCNTs are

    discussed in detail.

    2. Nonlocal nanobeam model

    Unlike the constitutive equation in classical elasticity,

    Eringens nonlocal elasticity theory [13] states that the stress

    at a pointx in a body depends not only on the strain at that point

    but also on those at all points of the body. This observation is in

    accordance with atomic theory of the lattice dynamics and

    experimental observation of the phonon dispersion [2]. Thus,

    the nonlocal stress tensor rat point x is expressed as

    r

    ZV

    a9x0x9; tTx0 dx0; 1

    where T(x) is the classical, macroscopic stress tensor at point x.

    a(9x0x9,t) is the nonlocal modulus or attenuation functionintroducing into the constitutive equation the nonlocal effect at

    the reference pointx produced by local strain at the source x0.9x0-x9 is the Euclidean distance, and t e0a=l is defined as the scalecoefficient that incorporates the small scale factor, where e0 is a

    material constant determined experimentally or approximated by

    matching the dispersion curves of plane waves with those of

    atomic lattice dynamics, and a andl are the internal and external

    characteristic lengths (e.g. crack length, wavelength), respectively.

    The stress tensorT(x) at pointx in a Hookean solid is related to

    the strain tensor e(x) at the point by the generalized Hookes law[19]

    Tx Cx : ex; 2

    whereC(x) is the fourth-order elasticity tensor and : denotes the

    double-dot product.

    From Eqs. (1) and (2), the integral nonlocal constitutive

    relations can be represented in an equivalent differential form

    as[2]

    1tl2r2r T: 3

    3. Nonlinear vibration analysis of nonlocal SWCNTs

    Fig. 1 shows a SWCNT modeled as a Timoshenko nanobeamwith length L, radius r, and effective tube thickness h. I t is

    assumed that the SWCNTs vibrate only in the xzplane. Based on

    Timoshenko beam theory, the displacements of an arbitrary point

    in the beam along the x- and z-axes, denoted by ~Ux;z; t and~Wx;z; t, respectively, are

    ~Ux;z; t Ux; t zCx; t; ~Wx;z; t Wx; t; 4

    where U(x,t) and W(x,t) are displacement components in the

    midplane,C is the rotation of beam cross-section and tis time.

    The von Karman type nonlinear strain-displacement relations give

    exx@U

    @x

    1

    2

    @W

    @x

    2z

    @C

    @x ; gxz

    @W

    @x C; 5

    where,exx is the axial strain, and gxz is the shear strain.

    The strain energy Vis given by

    V1

    2

    Z L0

    ZA

    sxxexxsxzgxzdAdx; 6

    where A is the cross-sectional area of the beam, sxx and txz arenormal and shear stresses, respectively. By submitting Eq. (5) into

    Eq. (6), the strain energy Vcan be represented as

    V1

    2

    Z L0

    ZA

    sxx@U

    @x

    1

    2

    @W

    @x

    2" #sxxz

    @C

    @x sxz

    @W

    @x C

    ( )dAdx

    1

    2

    Z L0

    Nx@U

    @x

    1

    2

    @W

    @x

    2" # Mx

    @C

    @x Qx

    @W

    @x C

    ( )dx;

    7

    where the normal resultant force Nx, bending moment Mx, and

    transverse shear force Qxare calculated from

    Nx

    ZA

    sxx dA; Mx

    ZA

    sxxzdA; Qx

    ZA

    sxzdA: 8

    The kinetic energy Kcan be calculated from

    K12

    Z L

    0rA

    @U

    @t

    2

    rA @W

    @t

    2

    rI @C

    @t

    2

    " #dx; 9

    whereIis the second moment of area and r is the mass density ofbeam material.

    For a beam type structure, the thickness and width are much

    smaller than its length. Therefore, for beams with transverse

    motion in thexzplane, the nonlocal constitutive relations (3) can

    be approximated to one-dimensional form as[19]

    sxxe0a2d

    2sxxdx2

    Eexx; sxze0a2d

    2sxzdx2

    Ggxz; 10

    where E and G are Youngs modulus and shear modulus,

    respectively. The constitutive relations in classical elasticity

    theories can be recovered by setting the nonlocal parametere0a =0.

    Using the Hamiltons principleZ t0

    dKdVdt 0; 11

    substituting Eqs. (7) and (9) into Eq. (11), integrating by parts and

    setting the coefficients of dU, dW and dC to zero leads to the

    equations of motion as [3335]

    @Nx@x

    rA@2U

    @t2 ; 12a

    @Qx

    @x

    @

    @x

    Nx@W

    @x rA @

    2W

    @t2 ; 12b

    r

    L

    x

    z

    h

    Fig. 1. A single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) modeled as a nonlocal Timoshenko

    nanobeam.

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 1727 17351728

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    3/9

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    4/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    4. Solution method

    The differential quadrature (DQ) method [37,38] is used to

    solve nonlinear Eq. (20) and the associated boundary conditions

    to determine the nonlinear free vibration frequencies of nonlocal

    SWCNTs. The fundamental idea of the DQ method is to

    approximate the derivative of a function at a sample point as a

    linear weighted sum of the function values at all of the sample

    points in the problem domain. Hence, u, w and c and their kthderivatives with respect to x can be approximated by

    fu; w;cg XN

    m 1

    lmx umxm; t; wmxm; t;cmxm; t

    ; 25

    @k

    @xk u; w;c

    9x xi XN

    m 1

    Ck im um xm; t ; wm xm; t ; cm xm; t

    ;

    26

    whereNis the total number of nodes distributed along the x-axis,

    lm(x) is the Lagrange interpolation polynomials, and Cim(k) is the

    weighting coefficients whose recursive formula can be found in

    [3740]. The cosine pattern is used to generate the DQ pointsystem

    xi1

    2 1cos

    pi1N1

    ; i 1; 2;. . .N: 27

    Applying Eqs (25) and (26) to Eq. (20), one obtains a set of

    nonlinear ordinary differential equations

    a11XN

    m 1

    C2im

    um1

    Z

    XNm 1

    C1im

    wmXN

    m 1

    C2im

    wm

    ! I1 uim

    2XN

    m 1

    C2im

    um

    !;

    28a

    a55 XN

    m 1

    C2im wmZXN

    m 1

    C1imcm !S1im2S2i I1 wim

    2XN

    m 1

    C2im wmm2XN

    m 1

    C2im umm4XN

    m 1

    C4im um

    !;

    28b

    d11XN

    m 1

    C2imcma55Z

    XNm 1

    C1im

    wmZci

    ! I3

    cim2XN

    m 1

    C2im

    cm

    " #;

    28c

    where the dot represents the derivative with respect to the

    dimensionless timei,

    S1ia11

    ZX

    N

    m 1

    C2

    im

    um XN

    m 1

    C1

    im

    wm 3

    2ZX

    N

    m 1

    C1

    im

    wm !2

    24XN

    m 1

    C2im wmXN

    m 1

    C1im umXN

    m 1

    C2im wm

    #; 29

    S2ia11Z2

    3XN

    m 1

    C2im wm

    !39

    XNm 1

    C1im wmXN

    m 1

    C2im wmXN

    m 1

    C3im wm

    24

    3

    2

    XNm 1

    C1im wm

    !2 XNm 1

    C4im wm

    35a11

    Z

    XNm 1

    C4im umXN

    m 1

    C1im wm

    "

    3 XN

    m 1

    C3im um XN

    m 1

    C2im wm3 XN

    m 1

    C2im um XN

    m 1

    C3im wm

    XN

    m 1

    C1im umXN

    m 1

    C4im wm

    #: 30

    The associated boundary conditions can be handled in the

    same way. For example, the boundary conditions of a hinged

    hinged SWCNT are written as

    d11XN

    m 1

    C11mcma11Z

    XNm 1

    C21mumXN

    m 1

    C11mwm

    "

    3

    2Z

    XNm 1

    C11mwm

    !2 XNm 1

    C21mwmXN

    m 1

    C11mumXN

    m 1

    C21mwm

    35

    m2 I3XN

    m 1C21m cmI1Z w1m2I1Z

    XNm 1

    C21mum !

    0;

    u1 w1 0; at z 0; 31a

    d11XN

    m 1

    C1Nmcma11Z

    XNm 1

    C2NmumXN

    m 1

    C1Nmwm

    "

    3

    2Z

    XNm 1

    C1Nmwm

    !2 XNm 1

    C2NmwmXN

    m 1

    C1NmumXN

    m 1

    C1Nmwm

    35

    m2 I3XN

    m 1

    C2NmcmI1Z wNm

    2I1ZXN

    m 1

    C2Nmum

    ! 0;

    uN wN 0; at z 1: 31b

    Denoting the unknown dynamic displacement vector

    d uif gT; wif g

    T; ci Tn oT

    ; i 1; 2;. . .N; 32Table 2

    Dimensionless linear and nonlinear fundamental frequencies of nonlocal (8, 0)

    SWCNTs: results with varying total number of nodes N.

    N HH CH CC

    ol onl ol onl ol onl

    5 0.45690 0.66723 0.81629

    6 0.41943 0.43755 0.60107 0.60978 0.81256

    7 0.42263 0.44016 0.60342 0.61924 0.80536 0.83042

    8 0.42333 0.44055 0.60523 0.61963 0.80550 0.82071

    10 0.42333 0.44055 0.60526 0.61975 0.80551 0.81888

    16 0.42333 0.44055 0.60526 0.61975 0.80551 0.81888

    20 0.42333 0.44055 0.60526 0.61975 0.80551 0.81888

    Table 3

    Dimensionless linear fundamental frequency of a hingedhinged nonlocal

    Timoshenko nanobeam.

    L/h (e0a)2=0.5 (e0a)

    2=1.5 (e0a)2=2.5

    Ref.[19] Present Ref.[19] Present Ref .[19] Present

    10 9.6335 9.6331 9.2101 9.2097 8.8380 8.8377

    20 9.6040 9.5942 9.1819 9.1726 8.8110 8.8020

    100 9.5135 9.4765 9.0953 9.0600 8.7279 8.6940

    Table 1

    The elastic modulus of zigzag (5, 0), (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs obtained by

    using molecular mechanics simulation.

    (n, m) Number of

    atoms

    Length

    (nm)

    Diameter

    (nm)

    Elastic modulus

    (TPa)

    (5, 0) 240 4.7971 0.391 1.1468

    (8, 0) 384 4.8659 0.626 1.1556

    (9, 0) 432 4.8749 0.705 1.1572

    (11, 0) 528 4.8857 0.861 1.1621

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 1727 17351730

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    5/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Eqs. (28) and (31) can be expressed in matrix form as

    KL KNLd M d 0; 33

    where M is the mass matrix, KL is the linear stiffness matrix and

    KNL is nonlinear stiffness matrix that is the functions in d. M, KLandKNLare 3N 3Nmatrices.

    Expanding the dynamic displacement vector d in the form of

    d deioi; 34

    whereo OLffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffir=E

    p represents the dimensionless frequency,O is

    the nonlinear vibration frequency of the SWCNT,

    d ui T

    ; wi T

    ; ci Tn oT

    is the vibration mode shape

    vector. Substituting Eq. (34) into Eq. (33) yields the nonlinear

    eigenvalue equations as follows:

    KL KNLd

    o2Md 0; 35

    This nonlinear equation can be solved through a direct

    iterative process below

    Step 1: By neglecting the nonlinear matrix KNL, a linear

    eigenvalue (ol) and the associated eigenvector are obtained fromEq. (35). The eigenvector is then appropriately scaled up such that

    the maximum transverse displacement is equal to a given

    vibration amplitude wmax. Note that wmax=w(0.5)for clamped

    clamped and hingedhinged SWCNTs while wmax=w(0.57) for a

    clampedhinged SWCNT.Step 2: Using the eigenvector to calculate KNL, a new

    eigenvalue and eigenvector are obtained from the updated

    eigensystem (35).

    Step 3: The eigenvector is scaled up again and step 2 is

    repeated until the relative error between the given vibration

    amplitude and the maximum transverse displacement wmax iswithin 0.1%.

    5. Molecular mechanics simulation for the elastic modulus of

    SWCNTs

    It was assumed in many previous studies [9,11,13,17,28]

    dealing with vibration behavior of SWCNTs that the elastic

    modulus of the SWCNT is about 1 TPa. In fact, the elastic modulus

    is different for different diameters and chirality of the SWCNT and

    can be determined through molecular mechanics (MM) simula-

    tion. The present paper employs the MM simulation to obtain the

    elastic modulus of zigzag (5, 0), (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs

    shown inFig. 2. The interatomic interactions in the SWCNTs are

    described by the COMPASS force field (condensed-phased

    optimized molecular potential for atomistic simulation studies)

    [41]. This is the first and only ab initio force field to enable

    accurate simulation and simultaneous prediction of structural,

    conformational, vibrational, and thermophysical properties for a

    broad range of molecules both in isolation and in the condensed-

    phase. The MM simulations are carried out at a temperature of 0 K

    to avoid the thermal effect [42]. The thickness of the SWCNT is

    selected as 0.34 nm. It is assumed that the two ends of the SWCNT

    are fixed boundaries. The simulations of the SWCNT under

    compression can be identified through a minimizer processor,

    which enables the atoms in CNTs to rotate and move relative to

    each other following a certain minimization algorithm tominimize the strain energy so that an equilibrium state can be

    identified. In the present analysis, energy minimization is

    conducted using the smart minimizer that switches from the

    steepest-descent to conjugated gradient and then to the Newton

    method. The strain energy of the SWCNT is collected at every

    compression deformation with the incremental displacement step

    of 0.01 nm. Once the strain energy at every compression step is

    available, the second derivative of the strain energy with respect

    to the compression can easily be obtained through a simple finite

    difference method. The modulus and radius of the zigzag (5, 0), (8,

    0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs are listed inTable 1and will be used

    in the next section for nonlinear vibration analysis of SWCNTs.

    These values agree well with the results obtained from the

    molecular dynamic simulation [43], molecular structural

    mechanics [44]and experiment[45].

    It should be pointed out that for CNTs modeled as a 1-D

    isotropic solid such as the Timoshenko beam model used in the

    present paper, elastic modulus is the most important elastic

    parameter that influences the vibration frequencies of the

    SWCNTs. As in many previous studies, see, for example,

    Refs. [9,18], our focus is placed on the effect of diameter and

    chirality on the elastic modulus of the SWCNTs by using MM

    simulation while the shear modulus is approximately determined

    fromG =0.5E/(1+n). The Poissons ratio is taken as the value of thegraphite, i.e. v=0.19.

    6. Numerical results

    Table 2 lists the dimensionless fundamental frequencies

    (oOLffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffir=E

    p ) of (8, 0) SWNTs (m=0.15) with varying total

    numbers of nodes N. o l and onl denote the linear and nonlinearfrequencies (wmax=0.4), respectively. The SWNTs are modeled as

    nonlocal Timoshenko nanobeams with hingedhinged (HH),

    clampedhinged (CH) and clampedclamped (CC) boundary

    conditions. Consider the SWNTs with radius r=0.313 nm, length

    L=5 nm, Youngs modulus E=1.1556 TPa, Poissons ratio v=0.19,

    effective tube thickness h=0.34 nm and shear correction factor

    Ks=0.563 [18]. It is seen that the accuracy of the results is

    improved with an increasing number of nodes Nand convergent

    results are obtained whenNZ10. Hence,N=10 is used in all of the

    following numerical calculations.

    Table 4

    Dimensionless linear fundamental frequency of SWCNTs with different boundary conditions.

    Boundary condition m=0.1 m=0.3 m=0.5

    Ref.[18] Present Ref. [18] Present Ref.[18] Present

    HH 3.0243 3.0210(0.11%) 2.6538 2.6385(0.58%) 2.2867 2.2665(0.89%)

    CH 3.6939 3.6849(0.24%) 3.2115 3.1724(1.23%) 2.7471 2.6982(1.81%)

    CC 4.3471 4.3269(0.47%) 3.7895 3.7032(2.33%) 3.2420 3.1372(3.34%)

    Table 5

    Comparisons of nonlinear frequency ratio onl/ol for isotropic homogeneoushingedhinged beam withL/h=100, h =0.3 in.

    Wmax=Y Present FEM[46]

    1.0 1.11920 1.1181

    2.0 1.41801 1.4178

    3.0 1.80919 1.8094

    4.0 2.24511 2.2455

    5.0 2.70429 2.7052

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 1727 1735 1731

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    6/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Table 3 gives the dimensionless linear fundamental

    frequencies (oOL2ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffirA=EI

    p ) of a hingedhinged nonlocal

    Timoshenko nanobeam with various slenderness ratio L/h. The

    parameters used in this example are[19]:L =10,E=30 106,r=1,

    v=0.3, Ks=5/6. Our results are in good agreement with the

    analytical results given by Reddy[19]using nonlocal Timoshenko

    beam theory as well.

    Table 4 presents the dimensionless linear fundamental

    frequencies (oOL2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffirA=EIp ) of the SWNTs based on nonlocalTimoshenko beam model. The analytical solutions given by

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.81.00

    1.05

    1.10

    1.15

    1.20

    wmax

    H-H:

    = 0.00 (l= 0.4680)

    = 0.10 (l= 0.4465)

    = 0.15 (l= 0.4233)

    = 0.20 (l= 0.3963)

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.81.00

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    1.08

    1.10

    C-H:

    = 0.00 (l= 0.6765)

    = 0.10 (l= 0.6420)

    = 0.15 (l= 0.6053)

    = 0.20 (l= 0.5628)

    wmax

    0.01.00

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    1.08

    wmax

    nl/

    l

    nl/

    l

    nl/

    l

    C-C:

    = 0.00 (l= 0.9036)

    = 0.10 (l= 0.8560)

    = 0.15 (l= 0.8055)

    = 0.20 (l= 0.7473)

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    Fig. 3. The effect of nonlocal parameter m on nonlinear frequency ratio versusamplitude curves of (8, 0) SWCNTs with L =5 nm: (a) hingedhinged; (b) clamped

    hinged; and (c) clampedclamped.

    0.01.00

    1.04

    1.08

    1.12

    1.16

    wmax

    nl/

    l

    nl/

    l

    nl/

    l

    H-H:

    L = 5 nm (l= 0.4233)

    L = 8 nm (l= 0.2742)

    L = 12 nm (l= 0.1853)

    L = 16 nm (l= 0.1397)

    1.00

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    1.08

    1.10

    C-H:

    L = 5 nm (l= 0.6053)L = 8 nm (

    l= 0.4085)

    L = 12 nm (l= 0.2808)

    L = 16 nm (l= 0.2130)

    wmax

    1.00

    1.01

    1.02

    1.03

    1.04

    1.05

    1.06

    C-C:

    L = 5 nm (l= 0.8055)

    L = 8 nm (l= 0.5666)

    L = 12 nm (l= 0.3972)

    L = 16 nm (l= 0.3036)

    wmax

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    Fig. 4. The effect of lengthLon nonlinear frequency ratio versus amplitude curves

    of (8, 0) SWCNTs withm=0.15: (a) hingedhinged; (b) clampedhinged; and (c)clampedclamped.

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 1727 17351732

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    7/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Wang et al. [18] are also provided for a direct comparison.

    The parameters used in this example are taken as [18]:

    radius r=0.339 nm, Youngs modulus E=5.5 TPa, Poissons ratio

    v=0.19, effective tube thicknessh =0.066 nm and shear correction

    factor Ks=0.563. The figures in the brackets are the relative

    errors between the present and analytical solutions.

    The difference is very small at m=0.1 but tends to increaseas m increases. This is because the nonlocal effect is notincluded in the shear constitutive relationship in their

    work[18].

    Table 5 gives nonlinear frequency ratio onl/ol at different

    maximum vibration amplitudes Wmax=Y (=1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0)

    0.01.00

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    1.08C-C:

    (5,0): r = 0.1955 nm (l= 0.6402)

    (8,0): r = 0.3130 nm (l= 0.8055)

    (9,0): r = 0.3525 nm (l= 0.8551)

    (11,0): r = 0.4305 nm (l= 0.9415)

    wmax

    nl/

    l

    1.00

    1.02

    1.04

    1.06

    1.08

    1.10C-H:

    (5,0): r = 0.1955 nm (l= 0.4666)

    (8,0): r = 0.3130 nm (l= 0.6053)(9,0): r = 0.3525 nm (

    l= 0.6496)

    (11,0): r = 0.4305 nm (l= 0.7304)

    wmax

    nl/

    l

    1.00

    1.04

    1.08

    1.12

    1.16

    1.20H-H:

    (5,0): r = 0.1955 nm (l= 0.3164)

    (8,0): r = 0.3130 nm (l= 0.4233)

    (9,0): r = 0.3525 nm (l= 0.4598)

    (11,0): r = 0.4305 nm (l= 0.5302)

    wmax

    nl/

    l

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    Fig.5. The effect of radius ron nonlinear frequency ratio versus amplitude curves

    of the SWCNTs with m=0.15 and L=5 nm: (a) hingedhinged; (b) clampedhinged; and (c) clampedclamped.

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    C-C:

    = 0.00

    = 0.10

    = 0.15

    = 0.20

    x/L

    w

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    C-H:

    = 0.00

    = 0.10

    = 0.15

    = 0.20

    x/L

    w

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    H-H:= 0.00

    = 0.10

    = 0.15

    = 0.20

    x/L

    w

    Fig. 6. The effect of nonlocal parameter on the nonlinear mode shapes (deflection

    w) of (8, 0) SWCNTs with wmax=0.4 andL =5 nm: (a) hingedhinged; (b) clamped

    hinged; and (c) clampedclamped.

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 17271735 1733

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    8/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    for isotropic homogeneous hingedhinged withL/h=100,h =0.3 in.

    Here, Yffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

    I=Ap

    is the radius of the gyration of the beam withIand

    A as the cross-section area and area moment of inertia, onlandolare the dimensionless nonlinear and linear frequencies,

    respectively. The results obtained by the present direct iterative

    method and finite element method[46]are listed inTable 5. Good

    agreement was observed between the results obtained by the

    direct iterative method and finite element method.

    We now investigate the nonlinear free vibration of hinged

    hinged (HH), clampedhinged (CH) and clampedclamped (C

    C) nonlocal SWCNTs. Zigzag (5, 0), (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs

    are considered and their elastic modulus and radius are listed in

    Table 1. The frequency is normalized aso OL ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffir=Ep inFigs. 37.InFigs. 35, the linear fundamental frequenciesolare also given.Unless otherwise stated, it is assumed that the length of theSWCNTs L =5 nm, Poissons ratio v=0.19, effective tube thickness

    h =0.34 nm and shear correction factor Ks=0.563[18].

    Fig. 3shows the nonlocal effect on the nonlinear frequency ratioonl/olversus amplitude curves for the (8, 0) SWCNTs withL =5 nm.Note that the nonlocal parameter m=0 corresponds to classicalSWCNTs without nonlocal effect. The SWCNTs exhibit a typical hard-

    spring behavior, i.e., the nonlinear frequency ratio increases as the

    vibration amplitude is increased for all boundary conditions. The

    nonlocal parameter has a significant effect on the nonlinear vibration

    behavior. At a given vibration amplitude, an increase in the nonlocal

    parameter leads to both smaller linear and nonlinear frequencies but

    a higher nonlinear frequency ratio. The clampedclamped SWCNT has

    the highest while the hingedhinged one has the lowest linear

    frequency, nonlinear frequency and nonlinear frequency ratio since

    the end support is the strongest for the clampedclamped SWCNT

    and the weakest for the hingedhinged SWCNT.

    Fig. 4 shows the effect of beam length L on the nonlinear

    frequency ratio versus amplitude curves for (8, 0) SWCNTs with

    m=0.15. Both linear frequency and nonlinear frequency ratiodecrease as the lengthL increases. As L changes from 5 to 16 nm,

    the linear frequency drops remarkably while the nonlinear

    frequency ratio decreases slightly. The effect of beam length L

    on the nonlinear frequency ratio is seen to be very small and is

    negligible for long SWCNT (LZ16 nm).

    Fig. 5 shows the effect of the radius r on the nonlinear

    frequency ratio versus amplitude curves for SWCNTs with m=0.15andL =5 nm. Again, zigzag (5, 0), (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs

    are considered. The radius changes from 0.1955 nm of the (5, 0)SWCNT to 0.4305 nm of the (11, 0) SWCNT. Results show that an

    increase in the radius significantly raises the linear fundamental

    frequency but slightly increases the nonlinear frequency ratio.

    The nonlinear fundamental mode shapes for the displacement w

    and rotation c of (8, 0) SWCNTs are plotted in Figs. 6 and 7with

    various nonlocal parameter (m=0.0, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2) at wmax=0.4 andL=5 nm. The maximum displacementw occurs at the midpoint of

    the hingedhinged and clampedclamped SWCNTs buts slightly

    deviates from the center of the clampedhinged SWCNT. The

    nonlocal parameter nearly has no effect on the nonlinear mode

    shape (w andc) for the hingedhinged SWCNT, but it is relatively

    large for the clampedhinged and clampedclamped SWCNTs. The

    similar phenomenon is also found by Wang et al. [18] for linear

    vibration modes of the nonlocal Timoshenko beams. Wang et al. [18]proved that the linear vibration modes of the hingedhinged beam

    do not include any nonlocal parameter, which is included in the

    linear vibration modes of the clampedhinged and clamped

    clamped beams. It is should be pointed out that though the nonlocal

    parameter has not effect on both the linear and nonlinear modes of

    the hingedhinged SWCNT, it has significant effect to both the linear

    and nonlinear frequencies of the hingedhinged SWCNT, as can be

    seen from all of the results inTables 3, 4andFig. 3.

    7. Conclusions

    This paper investigates the nonlinear free vibration of SWCNTs

    based on von Karman geometric nonlinearity, Timoshenko beam

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.08

    -0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    H-H:

    = 0.00

    = 0.10

    = 0.15

    = 0.20

    x/L

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.10

    C-H:

    = 0.00

    = 0.10

    = 0.15

    = 0.20

    x/L

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.06

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    C-C:

    = 0.00

    = 0.10

    = 0.15

    = 0.20

    x/L

    Fig. 7. The effect of nonlocal parameter on the nonlinear mode shapes (rotation

    c) of (8, 0) SWCNTs withwmax=0.4 andL =5 nm: (a) hingedhinged; (b) clamped

    hinged; and (c) clampedclamped.

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 1727 17351734

  • 8/9/2019 Nonlinearfreevibrationofsingle-walledcarbonnanotubesusingnonlocal Timoshenkobeamtheory

    9/9

    ARTICLE IN PRESS

    theory and Eringens nonlocal elasticity theory. Theoretical

    formulations include the small scale effect and the influences of

    transverse shear deformation and rotary inertia. The differential

    quadrature (DQ) method and a direct iterative approach are

    employed to obtain the nonlinear vibration frequencies and mode

    shapes of nonlocal nanobeams with different end supports. Zigzag

    (5, 0), (8, 0), (9, 0) and (11, 0) SWCNTs are considered in numerical

    calculation and their elastic modulus is obtained by using MM

    simulation. Numerical results show that: (1) at a given vibrationamplitude, an increase in nonlocal parameter leads to smaller

    linear and nonlinear frequencies but a higher nonlinear frequency

    ratio; (2) both linear frequency and nonlinear frequency ratio

    become lower as the length of SWCNT increases and the radius

    decreases; (3) the nonlocal parameter has an insignificant effect

    on the nonlinear mode shape but can considerably change the

    linear and nonlinear frequencies.

    References

    [1] A.C. Eringen, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 10 (1972) 1.[2] A.C. Eringen, J. Appl. Phys. 54 (1983) 4703.[3] A.C. Eringen, in: Nonlocal Continuum Field Theories, Springer-Verlag, New

    York, 2002.

    [4] J. Peddieson, G.R. Buchanan, R.P McNitt, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 41 (2003) 305.[5] P. Lu, H.P. Lee, C. Lu, P.Q. Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. 99 (2006) 073510.[6] Q. Wang, V.K. Varadan, Smart Mater. Struct. 15 (2006) 659.[7] M.C. Ece, M. Aydogdu, Acta Mech. 190 (2007) 185.[8] H.L. Lee, W.J. Chang, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 024302.[9] J.N. Reddy, S.D. Pang, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 023511.

    [10] C.M. Wang, S. Kitipomchai, C.W. Lim, M. Eisenberger, J. Eng. Mech. 134 (2008)475.

    [11] T. Murmu, S.C. Pradhan, Physica E 41 (2009) 1232.[12] T. Murmu, S.C. Pradhan, Physica E 41 (2009) 1451.[13] T. Murmu, S.C. Pradhan, Comp. Mater. Sci. 46 (2009) 854.

    [14] L.J. Sudak, J. Appl. Phys. 94 (2003) 7281.[15] Q. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 124301.[16] L.F. Wang, H.Y. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 195412.[17] P. Lu, H.P. Lee, C. Lu, P.Q. Zhang, Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 (2007) 52895300.[18] C.M. Wang, Y.Y. Zhang, X.Q. He, Nanotechnology 18 (2007) 105401.[19] J.N. Reddy, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 45 (2007) 288.[20] H. Heireche, A. Tounsi, A. Benzair, E.A.A. Bedia, Physica E 40 (2008) 2791.

    [21] A Tounsi, H Heireche, H.M. Berrabah, I. Mechab, J. Appl. Phys. 104 (2008)104301.

    [22] H Heireche, A Tounsi, A Benzair, I. Mechab, J. Appl. Phys. 104 (2008) 014301.[23] H Heireche, A Tounsi, A Benzair, Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 185703.[24] A Tounsi, H Heireche, H.M. Berrabah, I. Mechab, J. Phys.Condens. Matter 21

    (2009) 448001.[25] A Tounsi, H Heireche, E.A.A. Bedia, J. Appl. Phys. 105 (2009) 126105.

    [26] J. Yang, X.L. Jia, S. Kitipornchai, J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 035103.[27] M. Aydogdu, Physica E 41 (2009) 1651.[28] Y.M. Fu, J.W. Hong, X.Q. Wang, J. Sound Vib. 296 (2006) 746.[29] D. Walgraef, Eur. Phys. J.Spec. Top. 146 (2007) 443.[30] H.S. Shen, C.L. Zhang, Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 (2007) 1461.

    [31] C.L. Zhang, H.S. Shen, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 045408.[32] Y. Yan, W.Q. Wang, L.X. Zhang, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 23 (2009) 2625.

    [33] L.L. Ke, J. Yang, S. Kitipornchai, Y. Xiang, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 16 (2009)488.

    [34] L.L. Ke, J. Yang, S. Kitipornchai, Compos. Struct. 92 (2010) 678.[35] S. Kitipornchai, L.L. Ke, J. Yang, Y. Xiang, J. Sound Vib. 324 (2009) 962.[36] J.N. Reddy, in: Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates, CRC Press, New

    York, 1997.[37] C.W. Bert, X. Wang, A.G. Striz, Int. J. Solids Struct. 30 (1993) 1737.[38] C. Shu, in: Differential Quadrature and its Application in Engineering,

    Springer, London, 2000.[39] J. Yang, S. Kitipornchai, K.M. Liew, Comput. Meth. Appl. M 192 (2003) 3861.

    [40] K.M. Liew, J. Yang, Y.F. Wu, Comput. Meth. Appl. M 195 (2006) 1007.[41] H. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 7338.

    [42] Q. Wang, K.M. Liew, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 046103.[43] Y. Jin, F.G. Yuan, Sci. Technol. 63 (2003) 1507.[44] C. Li, T.-W. Chou, Int. J. Solids Struct. 40 (2003) 2478.[45] A. Krishnan, E. Dujardin, T.W. Ebbesen, P.N. Yianilos, M.J. Treacy, Phys. Rev. B

    58 (1998) 14013.

    [46] S.R. Marur, G. Prathap, Comput. Mech. 35 (2005) 352.

    J. Yang et al. / Physica E 42 (2010) 17271735 1735