33
Normative influences across cultures: Conceptual differences & potential confounders among drivers in Australia & China Judy Fleiter Barry Watson, Alexia Lennon, Mark King & Kan Shi CRICOS No. 00213J 1st International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation 21-25 July 2012 | San Francisco

Normative influences across cultures: Conceptual differences & potential confounders

  • Upload
    freira

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Normative influences across cultures: Conceptual differences & potential confounders among drivers in Australia & China Judy Fleiter Barry Watson, Alexia Lennon, Mark King & Kan Shi. 1st International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Normative influences across cultures: Conceptual differences & potential confounders

among drivers in Australia & China

Judy FleiterBarry Watson, Alexia Lennon, Mark King & Kan Shi

CRICOS No. 00213J

1st International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation

21-25 July 2012 | San Francisco

Page 2: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Overview

Speeding in Australia and China Normative influences on speeding The concept of culture Results of qualitative and quantitative studies Potential cultural considerations (confounders) in

road safety research

Page 3: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Speeding in Australia

Years of rigorous enforcement & public education campaigns

Yet still implicated in ~25% fatal crashes1 of the ‘Fatal 4’

Australian Transport Council, 2011

Page 4: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders
Page 5: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Speeding in China

• Rapid motorisation in recent years• Traffic-related mortality increased 81% in 20

years to 2006 (Wang et al, 2008)

• Statistics vary (see Li et al, 2012)

– Total annual fatality estimates range from 67,000 – 100,000+

• Speed implicated in 50-90% fatal crashes

• Road safety research in infancy

Page 6: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Normative influences (1)

• Friends– Peer influence– Graduated driver licensing restrictions

• Family– Role models– Parental supervision during Learner phase

• Other road users– Platoon– Keeping up with speed of others

Page 7: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Normative influences (2)

• Personal norms

• Group norms

• Subjective norms

• Moral norms….

Page 8: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Normative influences (3)

• Commonly examined only in one cultural context

• Usually in highly motorised countries

• What do we know about this issue in rapidly motorising countries, such as China?

Page 9: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Culture in Road Safety Context (1)

1. Culture as interaction between specific groups of road users (eg age, ethnicity, education)

Differential impact of broader societal influences (eg traffic laws) on specific groups, focussing

on group interaction

Page 10: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Culture in Road Safety Context (2)

2. Study culture with ‘cross-cultural’ studies:

Same behaviour/group is studied in 2 or more culturally-bound contexts

Characteristics that are specific to people because of geographic location, common natural history

Encompasses broader societal influences and person-based factors

Page 11: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Challenges across Cultures

• Methodological:– May be fundamental differences in economic,

institutional, social, cultural factors

• Theoretical:– Understanding behaviour across groups– How best to operationalise theoretical components

developed in 1 context to maintain essence of original meaning?

Page 12: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Chinese Road Safety Research

• Limited to date• Role of ‘self’ different in Chinese society?• Xie & Parker, 2002

– Culturally specific issues relevant in China, but not Britain:

– Sense of social hierarchy– Challenge to legitimate authority– Value of interpersonal networks

Page 13: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Type Location N Recruitment

Focus group interviews

Queensland 67 Community & University

Questionnaire Queensland 833 Service station food courts

Focus group interviews

Beijing 35 CAA Membership & University

Questionnaire Beijing 299 Car washing shops

Method

*Normative influence & self-identity examined in both countries*Part of a larger project examining social learning and reinforcement factors on

speeding behaviour

Page 14: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Self-identity

Is it important to be known as someone who drives above the

speed limit?

Page 15: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Self-identity

• Australia– Project image of responsible & safe driver (ie

obey limits), even if not

• China– Of no real consequence– Not worthy of discussion because speeding is

so common

Page 16: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Question...

If you received a speeding ticket, who would you be embarrassed

to tell?

Page 17: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Embarrassed?

• Australia– Embarrassment Dichotomy– ‘Hide the ticket’ vs. ‘No big deal’

• China– No embarrassment– Just ‘bad luck’ if caught– Happy to warn others of enforcement sites

Page 18: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Community Norms (1)

When interviewed, drivers in both countries reported:

*Speeding is commonplace

*Majority of people speed

*Perceptions of community acceptance/tolerance of speeding

Page 19: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Community Norms (2)

Australia:“I just assumed that everybody speeds. Most on the

road are keeping up with me and I’m sometimes trying to keep up with them.

” 49 year old male

Page 20: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Community Norms (3)

China:Asked a specific question

(based on Perkins & Wechsler, 2006)

Imagine that someone visits you from another country. They have never been here before. What would you tell

them about driving speeds in Beijing?

Page 21: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Community Norms (4)

China:

Expecting similar results to those found in Australia because speeding had already been described

as widespread and ‘no big deal’ by Chinese participants.

Page 22: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

30 yr old male:

“Speaker 1: I would tell them that there is no speeding in Beijing.

It’s the same as when we tell others that our University is the best. When we go to foreign countries, we will tell others that China is the

best country in the world. So when we talk about speeding with foreigners, you are not just

yourself, you must...

Page 23: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

26 year old male:Speaker 2…take the reputation of our country into

consideration.

Speaker 1: Yes, you are not only yourself. More importantly, you represent the honour of the whole country. In our country, we don’t take speeding as seriously as foreigners. In their eyes, speeding is a big deal so if they ask me about this issue, I will tell them speeding is not a common thing.

Speaker 2 :I agree. I would say that I have never noticed people speeding. We should show others the good side of our country and city.

Page 24: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

The Concept of Face

• Integral in Chinese conduct

• ‘An individual’s public or social image gained by performing one of more specific social roles that are well recognised by others (Luo, 2007)

• Face saving/reputation saving of nation

• ‘Faking good for foreigners’

• Triandis’ welfare of the collective (Triandis, 2001)

– Individualism-collectivism dimension

Page 25: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Quantitative findings

Page 26: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Type of Driver

Question Australia China

Never deliberately drive above Speed limit

19.8% 39.7% 2 (4) = 72.81, p<.001, øc = 0.26

Often drive above Speed limit 24.8% 7%

Page 27: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Community NormsAustralia China Contrary to Interview?

Drivers here think it is OK to exceed speed limit

M=3.1*SD = 2

M=2.2SD=1.2

Drivers here think you are unlucky if caught speeding

M=3.58**SD= 2.1

M= 2.36SD=1.3

I would be embarrassed to tell people I got caught speeding

M=4.45SD=2.1

M=4.57SD=1.7

*t(820)=8.08, p<.0001, =.54 ** t(827)=11.58, p<.0001, =.69

Scored: 1= Strongly Disagree to 7 = Strongly Agree

Page 28: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Discussion

• Discrepancy between qualitative & quantitative findings within countries

• Perceptions of greater community acceptance of speeding appeared higher in Australia

• Australian drivers appear less compliant with speed limits than Chinese drivers

Page 29: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

But are they ?

Page 30: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Conclusions

• Results may reflect ‘reality’ or may be related to ‘faking good for foreigners’

• However, a foreign researcher (me) was present when ‘faking good’ was discussed

• Could socially desirable responding be taking place in both countries?

Page 31: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Food for Thought…

• The issue of ‘face’ in road safety context not previously described

• More research needed to better understand this potential confounder and to search for others

• Important because international collaborations taking place to assist rapidly motorising countries deal with enormous road trauma burden

Page 32: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

Thank you, any questions/comments?

Acknowledgements:Australian Postgraduate Award, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia-

China Fellowship, Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Psychology

[email protected]

Mark your Diaries!International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety

Conference (ICADTS T2013)August 2013, Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre

Page 33: Normative influences across cultures:  Conceptual differences & potential confounders

References

Australian Transport Council. (2011). National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020. Retrieved from http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/roads/safety/national_road_safety_strategy/index.aspx.

Li, Y., Xie, D., Nie, G., & Zhang, J. (2012). The drink driving situation in China. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13, 101-108. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.637097

Luo, Y. (2007). Guanxi and business. New Jersey: World Scientific.

Perkins, H. W., & Wechsler, H. (1996). Variation in perceived college drinking norms and its impact on alcohol abuse: A nationwide study. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(4), 961-974.

Triandis, H. (2001). Individualism-Collectivism and Personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924.

Wang, Y., Hasselberg, M., Wu, Z. Z., & Laflamme, L. (2008). Distribution and characteristics of road traffic crashes in the Chaoyang District of Beijing, China. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 334-340.

Xie, C., & Parker, D. (2002). A social psychological approach to driving violations in two Chinese cities. Transportation Research Part F, 5, 293-308.