51
Research Internship Report prepared by HADI Supervisor: Prof Jinn-Guey Lay; Miss Rohan Department of Geography, College of Science, National Taiwan University A. Purpose The purpose of this report is to document the tasks have been completed as of 24 July 2012 as instructed by Miss Rohan. This report is structured into four sections: section B summarizes the tasks completed, section C elaborates in detail the procedure in each task, section D presents the results of the analysis, and finally section E concludes and gives recommendation for further analysis. B. Summary Major tasks accomplished include: (1) Conversion of land use vector model to raster model; (2) Divide the land use map into two sub-study areas: the “basin” subarea and the “SW 1 ” (Southwest) subarea (see fig 1); (2) Map and calculate land use change/transition for the two sub-study areas, for three periods considered: year 1980-1995, 1995-2008, and 1980-2008; (3) Produce land use change matrix in to show areas undergoing land cover change for each transition, and percentage distribution of change from one land use category to other categories; and (4) Map the urbanization, deforestation, and afforestation trend. 1 Named Southwest because it is in the SW part of Yang Ming Shan.

NTUTaipei_internship

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Research Internship Report

prepared by

HADI

Supervisor: Prof Jinn-Guey Lay; Miss Rohan

Department of Geography, College of Science, National Taiwan University

A. Purpose

The purpose of this report is to document the tasks have been completed as of 24

July 2012 as instructed by Miss Rohan. This report is structured into four

sections: section B summarizes the tasks completed, section C elaborates in detail

the procedure in each task, section D presents the results of the analysis, and

finally section E concludes and gives recommendation for further analysis.

B. Summary

Major tasks accomplished include: (1) Conversion of land use vector model to

raster model; (2) Divide the land use map into two sub-study areas: the “basin”

subarea and the “SW1” (Southwest) subarea (see fig 1); (2) Map and calculate

land use change/transition for the two sub-study areas, for three periods

considered: year 1980-1995, 1995-2008, and 1980-2008; (3) Produce land use

change matrix in to show areas undergoing land cover change for each transition,

and percentage distribution of change from one land use category to other

categories; and (4) Map the urbanization, deforestation, and afforestation trend.

1 Named Southwest because it is in the SW part of Yang Ming Shan.

C. Methodology and Detail Procedure

All of the data processing and analysis was done using ArcGIS 10 and Ms Excel.

(1) The conversion of land use vector map to raster was done using the ArcGIS 10

Conversion tools, from polygon to raster. Fig 2 shows the rasterization of

land use vector map year 1980 as the input feature, the 9 categories land cover

classification (table 1) as the value field, and 8x8 meters cell size (cell area of

64 square meters). This cell size was determined as such to ensure the ‘traffic

(road)’ land cover class was not ‘missing’. The resulting raster cell (fig 3)

contained the value 1 to 9 representing the land cover category.

“SW” sub-study

area

“Basin” sub-study

area

Fig 2 Land use rasterization

Fig 1 Division of the study area

(2) Division of the land use raster was done using Extraction

by Mask tool in Spatial Analyst toolbox. Each of the

three land use rasters in fig 3 was clipped with the “basin”

and “SW” defined polygon as mask feature. The land use

change analysis was done separately for the two parts of

study area.

LUtype2012 Type Example

1 Agriculture Rice, orchard

2 Forest Conifer, broadleaf, bamboo

3 Traffic Road, parking lot

4 Water body River, lake

5 Building Residence, industry

6 Public facilities School, power station

7 Recreation Park, stadium

8 Salt industries (none in the study area)

9 Others Lawn, wasteland, landslide

Table 1 Land Use Classification

Fig 3 Ras1980lu Ras1995lu Ras2008lu

(3) Mapping land use transition was done using map algebra

(raster calculator). For changes from year 1980 to 1995 in

the whole of the study area, this following syntax was

evaluated: ("ras1980lu" * 100) + ("ras1995lu" * 10) with the

output name specified as “1980sum1995”.

The value resulting from the calculation ranged from 110,

120, 130, …, 210, …, 990, each indicating the land use

transition from one category to another. For example:

110 = Agriculture (remains) to Agriculture

120 = Agriculture to Forest

250 = Forest to Building

and so on.

Fig 4a ras1980lu

Fig 4b SW1980lu

(Southwest part of

the study area,

clipped from land use

1980 raster)

Fig 4c bas1980lu (River basin part of

the study area)

For changes from year 1995 to 2008, in the “Southwest” area (“SW95sum08”),

the syntax was: ("SW1995lu" * 10) + ("SW2008lu”). The output value ranged from

11 to 99, the first digit is the old/initial (from) land use category and the second digit

is the new (to) category in the transition.

For changes from year 1980 to 2008 in the “basin” area (“bas90sum08”), the

syntax was: ("bas1980lu" * 100) + ("bas2008lu”). The output value then ranged

from 101, 102, 103, …, 908, 909.

No

Change

Area Output Raster Name

From To

1

1980 1995

Whole 1980sum1995

2 Basin bas80sum95

3 Southwest SW80sum95

4

1995 2008

Whole 1995sum2008

5 Basin bas95sum08

6 Southwest SW95sum08

Fig 5 Land Use Change map

between 1980 and 1995

covering the whole study area

7

1980 2008

Whole 1980sum2008

8 Basin bas80sum08

9 Southwest SW80sum08

(4) Land use change ‘matrices’—a 9x9 matrix pairing 9 of the land cover classes

one to another that gives 9 persistence cases (on the diagonal) and the remaining 82

possible land use changes on the off-diagonal—were then constructed based on the

number of cells (‘Count’ value in the raster’s attribute table). Again, the change was

tabulated for three time periods: 1980-1995, 1995-2008, and 1980-2008 to see the

temporal land use dynamic. For those three periods, the change was also

differentiated into three areas of coverage: the “Basin”, “SW (Southwest)”, and

“Whole” of area being studied. For standard, the matrix row was designated for

end-year (later) land use and the column was for the former land use.

10 20 30 … 90

100 110 120 130 … 190

200 210 220

300

900 910 920 930 … 990

10 20 30 … 90

100 34335 56608 1896 … 3867

200 15713 271538

300

900 2823 37112 498 … 3627

Table 2 Land use change matrix, Cell Counts, the “whole” study area, 1980-1995

1995 1980

1980 1995

From cell counts, area of change was calculated by simply multiplying the count

value with the cell size, which is 0.000064 sq km. In table 2, area of cell ‘110’

(agriculture remains agriculture) is (34335 x 0.000064) = 2.19744 sq km. The

distribution of change was also broken down as percentage area (proportion) of a land

use type that converted to each of the other 8 land use types. In table 2, for row

‘100’, % Area of cell ‘110’ is (2.19744 / 7.2837122) x 100. The full land use change

tables and matrices was presented in section D.

(5) Mapping urbanization, deforestation, and afforestation. This task was easily

done again with the help of raster calculator. Here, urbanization was defined as land

use change from non-urban-classified to urban-classified, with urban land use

includes3 traffic (land use code 3), building (5), public facilities (6), and recreation

(7). To make it easier, the land use map was reclassified into ‘urban’ and ‘non-urban’

using ‘Reclassify’ tool in Spatial Analyst. Urban land use types (3, 5, 6, and 7) were

2 Total area of agriculture land use in 1980, see table 3.

3 There may be different definition of urbanisation, and hence different classification of land use

types into urban areas.

given new value of 99, the others assigned new value of 90. Next, area where

urbanization has occurred, taking example between 1980 to 1995, was evaluated in

raster calculator as: ("urban1980" == 90) & ("urban1995" == 99).

,

1980 1995

Areas that have experienced deforestation and afforestation were similarly

derived, the former as forest areas (land use code 2) that become not forest areas (not

2), and the latter is the reverse, not forest areas becoming forest areas. In raster

calculator, the syntax is (taking 1980-2008 example)

Deforestation: ("ras1980lu" == 2) & ("ras2008lu" <>2)

Afforestation: ("ras1980lu" <>2) & ("ras2008lu" == 2)

D. Results and Preliminary Discussion

(1) Land use change in the “WHOLE” (“Basin” and “SW” combined) of

study area.

Table 3 General land use change, the ‘Whole’ study area, 1980-2008.

4 Cell size = 8m x 8m = 64 sq m = 0.000064 sq km OR 0.0064 ha 5 (Area of land use code n in year t / total area in year t) x 100. E.g. for agriculture 1980, it is (7.283712/37.091) x 100 = 19.64% 6 [(% from total study area of land use code n in year t2) – (% from total study area of land use code n in year t1). E.g. for forest 1995-2008, it

is (62.08 – 66.98)% = -4.90%.

LUType2012 Cell Counts Area (No. of cells x cell size4),

sqkm % from total study area5

Change in % from total study

area6

Code Name 1980 1995 2008 1980 1995 2008 1980 1995 2008 1980-1995 1995-2008 1980-2008

1 Agriculture 113808 57965 68099 7.283712 3.70976 4.358336 19.64 10.00 11.75 -9.64 1.75 -7.89

2 Forest 313390 388274 359831 20.05696 24.84954 23.02918 54.08 66.98 62.08 12.90 -4.90 8.00

3 Traffic 19601 24791 29455 1.254464 1.586624 1.88512 3.38 4.28 5.08 0.89 0.81 1.70

4 Water body 7142 10467 10503 0.457088 0.669888 0.672192 1.23 1.81 1.81 0.57 0.01 0.58

5 Building 59779 54358 49075 3.825856 3.478912 3.1408 10.31 9.38 8.47 -0.94 -0.91 -1.85

6 Public

facilities 0 10497 9295 0 0.671808 0.59488 0.00 1.81 1.60 1.81 -0.21 1.60

7 Recreation 18099 15793 27585 1.158336 1.010752 1.76544 3.12 2.72 4.76 -0.40 2.03 1.64

8 Salt industries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.

9 Others 47723 17548 25788 3.054272 1.123072 1.650432 8.23 3.03 4.45 -5.21 1.42 -3.79

Total 579542 579693 579631 37.091 37.1 37.096 100 100 100

LUType2012 Change in area (sq km)7 Annual rate of change in area (%)8

Code Name 1980-1995 % 1995-2008 % 1980-2008 % 1980-1995 1995-2008 1980-2008

1 Agriculture -3.57395 -49.07 0.648576 17.48 -2.92538 -40.16 -3.27 1.34 -1.43

2 Forest 4.792576 23.89 -1.82035 -7.33 2.972224 14.82 1.59 -0.56 0.53

3 Traffic 0.33216 26.48 0.298496 18.81 0.630656 50.27 1.77 1.45 1.80

4 Water body 0.2128 46.56 0.002304 0.34 0.215104 47.06 3.10 0.03 1.68

5 Building -0.34694 -9.07 -0.33811 -9.72 -0.68506 -17.91 -0.60 -0.75 -0.64

6 Public

facilities 0.671808 N.A. -0.07693 -11.45 0.59488 N.A. N.A -0.88 N.A.

7 Recreation -0.14758 -12.74 0.754688 74.67 0.607104 52.41 -0.85 5.74 1.87

8 Salt

industries N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

9 Others -1.9312 -63.23 0.52736 46.96 -1.40384 -45.96 -4.22 3.61 -1.64

Total Total

1.1 Land use change in the “WHOLE” study area between year 1980 and 1995.

7 (area of land use code n in year t2 – area of land use code n in year t1). E.g. for traffic 1980-2008, it is (1.88512 – 1.254464) = 0.630656 sq

km ; and % is (0.630656/ 1.88512) x 100 = 50.27% 8 % change in area / year interval. E.g. for Others 1980-2008, the interval is 28 years, therefore it is -45.96% / 18 = -1.64%

WHOLE

1980-1995

Land Use Type

1995 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

C

E

L

L

C

O

U

N

T

S

LU Type

1980 LU Code 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 34335 56808 1896 1548 10312 517 4525 0 3867 113808

Forest 200 15713 271538 4476 1747 8428 585 5082 0 5818 313387

Traffic 300 1147 6475 3761 403 5449 921 264 0 1181 19601

Water body 400 963 479 888 3942 507 141 0 222 7142

Building 500 2902 4391 11394 1089 27162 8164 1859 0 2818 59779

Public facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 73 11370 1858 499 1643 251 2390 0 15 18099

Salt industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 2823 37112 498 1239 833 59 1532 0 3627 47723

1995total 57956 388173 24771 10467 54334 10497 15793 0 17548

WHOLE

1980-1995

LUType

1995 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

A

R

E

A

S

Q

K

M9

LUType

1980 LUCode 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 2.19744 3.63571 0.12134 0.09907 0.65997 0.03309 0.28960 0 0.24749 7.28371

Forest 200 1.00563 17.37843 0.28646 0.11181 0.53939 0.03744 0.32525 0 0.37235 20.05677

Traffic 300 0.07341 0.41440 0.24070 0.02579 0.34874 0.05894 0.01690 0 0.07558 1.25446

Water body 400 0.06163 0.03066 0.05683 0.25229 0.03245 0.00000 0.00902 0 0.01421 0.45709

Building 500 0.18573 0.28102 0.72922 0.06970 1.73837 0.52250 0.11898 0 0.18035 3.82586

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00000 0.00000

Recreation 700 0.00467 0.72768 0.11891 0.03194 0.10515 0.01606 0.15296 0 0.00096 1.15834

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 0.18067 2.37517 0.03187 0.07930 0.05331 0.00378 0.09805 0 0.23213 3.05427

1995total 3.70918 24.84307 1.58534 0.66989 3.47738 0.67181 1.01075 0 1.12307

9 (Cell Counts) x 0.000064 sq km.

WHOLE

1980-1995

LUType

1995 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

A

R

E

A

%10

LUType

1980 LUCode 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 30.1711 49.92

12 1.67 1.36 9.06 0.45 3.98 0 3.40 100.00

Forest 200 5.01 86.65 1.43 0.56 2.69 0.19 1.62 0 1.86 100.00

Traffic 300 5.85 33.03 19.19 2.06 27.80 4.70 1.35 0 6.03 100.00

Water body 400 13.48 6.71 12.43 55.19 7.10 0.00 1.97 0 3.11 100.00

Building 500 4.85 7.35 19.06 1.82 45.44 13.66 3.11 0 4.71 100.00

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 0.40 62.82 10.27 2.76 9.08 1.39 13.21 0 0.08 100.00

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 5.92 77.77 1.04 2.60 1.75 0.12 3.21 0 7.60 100.00

10 % areal distribution of change into each of the 9 new LUTypes, from one old LUType. % Area nm = (area of LUType n in year t1 that

changed to LUType m in year t2 / total area of LUType n in year t1) x 100. 11 tells that 30.17% of agriculture area/land cover in 1980 remained as agriculture in 1995 12 tells that 49.92% of agriculture area/land cover in 1980 has been converted/has changed to forest area/land cover in 1995.

1.2 Land use change in the “WHOLE” study area between year 1995 and 2008

WHOLE

1995-2008

LUType

2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

C

E

L

L

C

O

U

N

T

S

LUType

1995 LUCode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 22788 21521 2354 1373 4317 623 2213 0 2748 57937

Forest 20 32606 308734 5116 1446 7448 992 15302 0 16625 388269

Traffic 30 543 4151 14888 1041 2265 146 1344 0 412 24790

Water body 40 861 1702 982 5242 371 16 904 0 387 10465

Building 50 5358 9795 4153 416 30084 704 2076 0 1744 54330

Public

facilities 60 294 657 299 0 1157 6683 918 0 489 10497

Recreation 70 3682 6453 889 81 1105 31 3403 0 149 15793

Salt

industries 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 90 1967 6815 774 904 2328 100 1425 0 3234 17547

2008total 68099 359828 29455 10503 49075 9295 27585 0 25788

WHOLE

1995-2008

LUType

2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

A

R

E

A

S

Q

K

M

LUType

1995 LUCode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 1.45843 1.37734 0.15066 0.08787 0.27629 0.03987 0.14163 0 0.17587 3.70797

Forest 20 2.08678 19.75898 0.32742 0.09254 0.47667 0.06349 0.97933 0 1.06400 24.84922

Traffic 30 0.03475 0.26566 0.95283 0.06662 0.14496 0.00934 0.08602 0 0.02637 1.58656

Water body 40 0.05510 0.10893 0.06285 0.33549 0.02374 0.00102 0.05786 0 0.02477 0.66976

Building 50 0.34291 0.62688 0.26579 0.02662 1.92538 0.04506 0.13286 0 0.11162 3.47712

Public

facilities 60 0.01882 0.04205 0.01914 0 0.07405 0.42771 0.05875 0 0.03130 0.67181

Recreation 70 0.23565 0.41299 0.05690 0.00518 0.07072 0.00198 0.21779 0 0.00954 1.01075

Salt

industries 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 90 0.12589 0.43616 0.04954 0.05786 0.14899 0.00640 0.09120 0 0.20698 1.12301

2008total 4.35834 23.02899 1.88512 0.67219 3.14080 0.59488 1.76544 0 1.65043

WHOLE

1995-2008

LUType

2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

%

A

R

E

A

LUType

1995 LUCode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 39.33 37.15 4.06 2.37 7.45 1.08 3.82 0 4.74 100.00

Forest 20 8.40 79.52 1.32 0.37 1.92 0.26 3.94 0 4.28 100.00

Traffic 30 2.19 16.74 60.06 4.20 9.14 0.59 5.42 0 1.66 100.00

Water body 40 8.23 16.26 9.38 50.09 3.55 0.15 8.64 0 3.70 100.00

Building 50 9.86 18.03 7.64 0.77 55.37 1.30 3.82 0 3.21 100.00

Public

facilities 60 2.80 6.26 2.85 0.00 11.02 63.67 8.75 0 4.66 100.00

Recreation 70 23.31 40.86 5.63 0.51 7.00 0.20 21.55 0 0.94 100.00

Salt

industries 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 90 11.21 38.84 4.41 5.15 13.27 0.57 8.12 0 18.43 100.00

1.3 Land use change in the “WHOLE” study area between year 1980 and 2008.

WHOLE

1980-2008

LUType

2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

C

E

L

L

C

O

U

N

T

S

LUType

1980 LUCode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 44162 50121 4062 1076 7314 348 3209 0 3511 113803

Forest 200 15729 273214 4779 2215 5180 515 4121 0 7620 313373

Traffic 300 1720 4161 4947 83 5590 1417 686 0 981 19585

Water body 400 154 540 568 5168 148 1 346 0 215 7140

Building 500 1339 3589 11800 608 28859 6643 4775 0 2141 59754

Public facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 2574 8213 1954 93 1047 298 3917 0 3 18099

Salt industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 2421 19916 1323 1260 882 73 10531 0 11317 47723

2008total 68099 359754 29433 10503 49020 9295 27585 0 25788

WHOLE

1980-2008

LUType

2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

A

R

E

A

S

Q

K

M

LUType

1980 LUCode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 2.82637 3.20774 0.25997 0.06886 0.46810 0.02227 0.20538 0 0.22470 7.28339

Forest 200 1.00666 17.48570 0.30586 0.14176 0.33152 0.03296 0.26374 0 0.48768 20.05587

Traffic 300 0.11008 0.26630 0.31661 0.00531 0.35776 0.09069 0.04390 0 0.06278 1.25344

Water body 400 0.00986 0.03456 0.03635 0.33075 0.00947 0.00006 0.02214 0 0.01376 0.45696

Building 500 0.08570 0.22970 0.75520 0.03891 1.84698 0.42515 0.30560 0 0.13702 3.82426

Public facilities 600 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 0.00000 0.00000

Recreation 700 0.16474 0.52563 0.12506 0.00595 0.06701 0.01907 0.25069 0 0.00019 1.15834

Salt industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 0.15494 1.27462 0.08467 0.08064 0.05645 0.00467 0.67398 0 0.72429 3.05427

2008total 4.35834 23.02426 1.88371 0.67219 3.13728 0.59488 1.76544 0 1.65043

WHOLE

1980-2008

LUType

2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industri

es

Others

%

A

R

E

A

LUType

1980 LUCode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 38.81 44.04 3.57 0.95 6.43 0.31 2.82 0 3.09 100.00

Forest 200 5.02 87.18 1.53 0.71 1.65 0.16 1.32 0 2.43 100.00

Traffic 300 8.78 21.25 25.26 0.42 28.54 7.24 3.50 0 5.01 100.00

Water

body 400 2.16 7.56 7.96 72.38 2.07 0.01 4.85 0 3.01 100.00

Building 500 2.24 6.01 19.75 1.02 48.30 11.12 7.99 0 3.58 100.00

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 14.22 45.38 10.80 0.51 5.78 1.65 21.64 0 0.02 100.00

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 5.07 41.73 2.77 2.64 1.85 0.15 22.07 0 23.71 100.0

(2) Land use change in ‘BASIN’ sub-study area.

LUType2012 Cell Counts Area (ha) % from total study area Change in % from total study

area

Code Name 1980 1995 2008 1980 1995 2008 1980 1995 2008 1980-1995 1995-2008 1980-2008

1 Agriculture 61233 45050 40964 391.89 288.32 262.17 17.98 13.22 12.03 -4.75 -1.20 -5.95

2 Forest 156589 189638 175873 1002.17 1213.68 1125.59 45.97 55.67 51.64 9.70 -4.03 5.67

3 Traffic 12566 22221 24633 80.42 142.21 157.65 3.69 6.52 7.23 2.83 0.71 3.54

4 Water body 7024 9229 9181 44.95 59.07 58.76 2.06 2.71 2.70 0.65 -0.01 0.63

5 Building 57264 45927 42394 366.49 293.93 271.32 16.81 13.48 12.45 -3.33 -1.03 -4.36

6 Public

facilities 0 10397 8656 0.00 66.54 55.40 0.00 3.05 2.54 3.05 -0.51 2.54

7 Recreation 18078 10623 19229 115.70 67.99 123.07 5.31 3.12 5.65 -2.19 2.53 0.34

8 Salt industries 0 0 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. 0.00 0.00 0.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.

9 Others 27900 7566 19660 178.56 48.42 125.82 8.19 2.22 5.77 -5.97 3.55 -2.42

Total 340654 340651 340590 2180.19 2180.17 2179.78 100 100 100

In the basin part of the study area, the three dominant land use types are, from the largest in terms of area, forest (45.97% of the basin area

in 1980), agriculture (17.98% in 1980) and building (16.81% in 1980), and they were still dominant in 2008. A trend of decreasing in area was

observable for agriculture, and, interestingly, building land cover. Agriculture area covered 17.98% of the total basin area in 1980, decreased

by 5.95% to 12.03% in 2008. Relative to its area in 1980, as much as 33.10% had converted to other land use types in 2008. What had

agriculture area converted to can be answered by the land use change matrix. Forest area, relative to its area in 1980, increased by

approximately 1.41% annually from 1980 to 1995, then decreased by 0.56% annually from 1995 to 2008. Building area shrinked by 25.97% in

2008 relative to its area in 1980. One logic and possible reason for this is conversion of the existing buildings’ use to public facilities or

recreation, and this ‘hypothesis’ can be checked in the matrix, to see whether majority of the reduction in building area was indeed due to

conversion to public facilities area. Another possible reason is the agency who prepared the land use map in 1980 did not differentiate public

facilities from building category of land use, as indicated by zero public facilities area in 1980. There was no salt industries land use in this

area.

LUType2012 Change in area (ha) Annual rate of change (%)

Code Name 1980-1995 % 1995-2008 % 1980-2008 % 1980-1995 1995-2008 1980-2008

1 Agriculture -103.57 -26.43 -26.15 -9.07 -129.72 -33.10 -1.76 -0.70 -1.18

2 Forest 211.51 21.11 -88.10 -7.26 123.42 12.32 1.41 -0.56 0.44

3 Traffic 61.79 76.83 15.44 10.85 77.23 96.03 5.12 0.83 3.43

4 Water body 14.11 31.39 -0.31 -0.52 13.80 30.71 2.09 -0.04 1.10

5 Building -72.56 -19.80 -22.61 -7.69 -95.17 -25.97 -1.32 -0.59 -0.93

6 Public 66.54 N.A. -11.14 -16.75 55.40 N.A. N.A -1.29 N.A.

facilities

7 Recreation -47.71 -41.24 55.08 81.01 7.37 6.37 -2.75 6.23 0.23

8 Salt

industries N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

9 Others -130.14 -72.88 77.40 159.85 -52.74 -29.53 -4.86 12.30 -1.05

Total

2.1 Land use change in “BASIN” sub-study area between 1980 and 1995

BASIN

1980-1995 1995 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1980 CELL COUNTS 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 27691 17221 1543 1201 8901 515 2423 0 1738 61233

Forest 200 10553 131342 3435 1139 4837 577 3604 0 1099 156586

Traffic 300 809 3215 2907 351 3429 850 182 0 823 12566

Water body 400 906 463 888 3905 506 141 0 215 7024

Building 500 2776 3490 11302 1084 25973 8148 1679 0 2812 57264

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 73 11349 1858 499 1643 251 2390 0 15 18078

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 2242 22558 288 1050 638 56 204 0 864 27900

1995total 45050 189638 22221 9229 45927 10397 10623 0 7566

BASIN 1980-1995

AREA (ha)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 177.22 110.21 9.88 7.69 56.97 3.30 15.51 N.A. 11.12 391.89

Forest 200 67.54 840.59 21.98 7.29 30.96 3.69 23.07 N.A. 7.03 1002.15

Traffic 300 5.18 20.58 18.60 2.25 21.95 5.44 1.16 N.A. 5.27 80.42

Water body 400 5.80 2.96 5.68 24.99 3.24 0.00 0.90 N.A. 1.38 44.95

Building 500 17.77 22.34 72.33 6.94 166.23 52.15 10.75 N.A. 18.00 366.49

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 0.47 72.63 11.89 3.19 10.52 1.61 15.30 N.A. 0.10 115.70

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 14.35 144.37 1.84 6.72 4.08 0.36 1.31 N.A. 5.53 178.56

1995total 292.04 1213.68 142.21 59.07 293.93 66.54 67.99 N.A. 48.42 2180.17

Change in 1995 -103.57 211.51 61.79 14.11 -72.56 66.54 -47.71 N.A. -130.14

BASIN 1980-1995

AREA (%)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 45.22 28.12 2.52 1.96 14.54 0.84 3.96 N.A. 2.84 100.00

Forest 200 6.74 83.88 2.19 0.73 3.09 0.37 2.30 N.A. 0.70 100.00

Traffic 300 6.44 25.58 23.13 2.79 27.29 6.76 1.45 N.A. 6.55 100.00

Water body 400 12.90 6.59 12.64 55.60 7.20 0.00 2.01 N.A. 3.06 100.00

Building 500 4.85 6.09 19.74 1.89 45.36 14.23 2.93 N.A. 4.91 100.00

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 0.40 62.78 10.28 2.76 9.09 1.39 13.22 N.A. 0.08 100.00

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 8.04 80.85 1.03 3.76 2.29 0.20 0.73 N.A. 3.10 100.00

Change in 1995 -4.75 9.70 2.83 0.65 -3.33 3.05 -2.19 N.A. -5.97

What is obvious from the above matrix is, assessing the change from 1980 to 1995, the highest proportion of building land use converted

to traffic (19.74%), followed by public facilities (14.23%). 83.88% of forest area remained forest, with the most dominant change (6.74%) was

into agriculture. Agriculture land use itself, had 28.12% of its area became forest and 14.54% became building. Another noticeable change

was 62.78% of recreation area in 1980 was classified as forest in 1995. Further investigation was also needed on why only 23.13% of traffic area

remained to be classified as traffic in 1995, with 25.58% became forest and 27.29% became building. The odd transition also appeared for

water body that with 44.40% (100-55.60) was classified as other land use types 1995, very likely owing to incorrect classification in 1980.

Was it the error in the agency who prepared and digitized the land use map, or much of the road existed in 1980 was closed in 1995? Looking at

recreation land use, 62.78% of it was classified as forest in 1995, possibly indicating the attempt by the Taiwan government to preserve the

virgin forest and stopped the recreational use.

2.2 Land use change in “BASIN” sub-study area between 1995 and 2008

BASIN

1995-2008 2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1995 CELL COUNTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 19794 13607 1887 1227 3868 619 1411 0 2609 45022

Forest 20 12988 145529 2770 718 4916 511 9715 0 12486 189633

Traffic 30 302 3068 14014 1016 2133 142 1235 0 310 22220

Water body 40 719 1265 904 4950 291 10 720 0 369 9228

Building 50 4039 6722 3435 410 27476 653 1805 0 1359 45899

Public

facilities 60 293 651 299 1151 6597 918 0 488 10397

Recreation 70 2223 3879 710 74 734 31 2875 0 97 10623

Salt

industries 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 90 606 1149 614 786 1825 93 550 0 1942 7565

2008total 40964 175870 24633 9181 42394 8656 19229 0 19660

BASIN 1995-2008

AREA (ha)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 126.68 87.08 12.08 7.85 24.76 3.96 9.03 N.A. 16.70 288.14

Forest 20 83.12 931.39 17.73 4.60 31.46 3.27 62.18 N.A. 79.91 1213.65

Traffic 30 1.93 19.64 89.69 6.50 13.65 0.91 7.90 N.A. 1.98 142.21

Water body 40 4.60 8.10 5.79 31.68 1.86 0.06 4.61 N.A. 2.36 59.06

Building 50 25.85 43.02 21.98 2.62 175.85 4.18 11.55 N.A. 8.70 293.75

Public facilities 60 1.88 4.17 1.91 0.00 7.37 42.22 5.88 N.A. 3.12 66.54

Recreation 70 14.23 24.83 4.54 0.47 4.70 0.20 18.40 N.A. 0.62 67.99

Salt industries 80 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 90 3.88 7.35 3.93 5.03 11.68 0.60 3.52 N.A. 12.43 48.42

2008total 262.17 1125.57 157.65 58.76 271.32 55.40 123.07 N.A. 125.82 2179.76

Change in 2008 -26.15 -88.10 15.44 -0.31 -22.61 -11.14 55.08 N.A. 77.40

BASIN 1995-2008

AREA (%)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 43.97 30.22 4.19 2.73 8.59 1.37 3.13 N.A. 5.79 100.00

Forest 20 6.85 76.74 1.46 0.38 2.59 0.27 5.12 N.A. 6.58 100.00

Traffic 30 1.36 13.81 63.07 4.57 9.60 0.64 5.56 N.A. 1.40 100.00

Water body 40 7.79 13.71 9.80 53.64 3.15 0.11 7.80 N.A. 4.00 100.00

Building 50 8.80 14.65 7.48 0.89 59.86 1.42 3.93 N.A. 2.96 100.00

Public facilities 60 2.82 6.26 2.88 0.00 11.07 63.45 8.83 N.A. 4.69 100.00

Recreation 70 20.93 36.52 6.68 0.70 6.91 0.29 27.06 N.A. 0.91 100.00

Salt industries 80 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 90 8.01 15.19 8.12 10.39 24.12 1.23 7.27 N.A. 25.67 100.00

Change in 2008 -1.20 -4.03 0.71 -0.01 -1.03 -0.51 2.53 N.A. 3.55

A considerably similar and continued trend was apparent in agriculture and forest land use from 1995 to 2008. In 2008, 30.22% of

agriculture area (equivalently 87.085 ha, largest addition to forest in terms of area) in 1995 became forest, while 6.85% forest turned into

agriculture. For building, the apparent transition into public facilities was not the case in 2008, with 14.65% became forest, an unlikely case

requiring further data validation. The proportion of recreation land use that changed to forest fell to 36.52%, with 20.93% used for agriculture

in 2008.

2.3 Land use change in “BASIN” sub-study area between 1980 and 2008

BASIN

1980-2008 2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1980 CELL COUNTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 29168 17264 3170 884 6287 334 1249 0 2872 61228

Forest 200 5363 133655 3180 1320 3401 382 2888 6383 156572

Traffic 300 1171 2502 3310 62 3346 947 376 0 836 12550

Water body 400 154 521 565 5085 140 1 343 0 214 7023

Building 500 1148 2862 11560 608 27586 6623 4767 0 2085 57239

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 2574 8203 1954 93 1047 298 3906 0 3 18078

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 1386 10866 894 1129 587 71 5700 0 7267 27900

2008total 40964 175873 24633 9181 42394 8656 19229 0 19660

BASIN 1980-2008

AREA (ha)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 186.68 110.49 20.29 5.66 40.24 2.14 7.99 N.A. 18.38 391.86

Forest 200 34.32 855.39 20.35 8.45 21.77 2.44 18.48 N.A. 40.85 1002.06

Traffic 300 7.49 16.01 21.18 0.40 21.41 6.06 2.41 N.A. 5.35 80.32

Water body 400 0.99 3.33 3.62 32.54 0.90 0.01 2.20 N.A. 1.37 44.95

Building 500 7.35 18.32 73.98 3.89 176.55 42.39 30.51 N.A. 13.34 366.33

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 16.47 52.50 12.51 0.60 6.70 1.91 25.00 N.A. 0.02 115.70

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 8.87 69.54 5.72 7.23 3.76 0.45 36.48 N.A. 46.51 178.56

2008total 262.17 1125.59 157.65 58.76 271.32 55.40 123.07 N.A. 125.82 2179.78

Change in 2008 -129.72 123.42 77.23 13.80 -95.17 55.40 7.37 N.A. -52.74

BASIN 1980-2008

AREA (%)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 47.64 28.20 5.18 1.44 10.27 0.55 2.04 N.A. 4.69 100.00

Forest 200 3.43 85.36 2.03 0.84 2.17 0.24 1.84 N.A. 4.08 100.00

Traffic 300 9.33 19.94 26.37 0.49 26.66 7.55 3.00 N.A. 6.66 100.00

Water body 400 2.19 7.42 8.04 72.40 1.99 0.01 4.88 N.A. 3.05 100.00

Building 500 2.01 5.00 20.20 1.06 48.19 11.57 8.33 N.A. 3.64 100.00

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 14.24 45.38 10.81 0.51 5.79 1.65 21.61 N.A. 0.02 100.00

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 4.97 38.95 3.20 4.05 2.10 0.25 20.43 N.A. 26.05 100.00

Change in 2008 -5.95 5.67 3.54 0.63 -4.36 2.54 0.34 N.A. -2.42

(3) Land use change in “SW” sub-study area.

LUType2012 Cell Counts Area (ha) % from total study area Change in % from total study

area

Code Name 1980 1995 2008 1980 1995 2008 1980 1995 2008 1980-1995 1995-2008 1980-2008

1 Agriculture 76286 21282 49094 488.23 136.20 314.20 20.46 5.71 13.16 -14.76 7.46 -7.30

2 Forest 229820 301244 270462 1470.85 1927.96 1730.96 61.65 80.77 72.52 19.13 -8.25 10.87

3 Traffic 9474 7249 9969 60.63 46.39 63.80 2.54 1.94 2.67 -0.60 0.73 0.13

4 Water body 623 2680 2559 3.99 17.15 16.38 0.17 0.72 0.69 0.55 -0.03 0.52

5 Building 7407 16317 13372 47.40 104.43 85.58 1.99 4.38 3.59 2.39 -0.79 1.60

6 Public 0 1343 1349 0.00 8.60 8.63 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.36

facilities

7 Recreation 16991 12662 18004 108.74 81.04 115.23 4.56 3.40 4.83 -1.16 1.43 0.27

8 Salt industries 0 0 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. 0.00 0.00 0.00 N.A. N.A. N.A.

9 Others 32206 10178 8144 206.12 65.14 52.12 8.64 2.73 2.18 -5.91 -0.55 -6.46

Total 372807 372955 372953 2385.96 2386.91 2386.90 100 100 100

LUType2012 Change in area (ha) Annual rate of change (%)

Code Name 1980-1995 % 1995-2008 % 1980-2008 % 1980-1995 1995-2008 1980-2008

1 Agriculture -352.03 -72.10 178.00 130.68 -174.03 -35.64 -4.81 10.05 -1.27

2 Forest 457.11 31.08 -197.00 -10.22 260.11 17.68 2.07 -0.79 0.63

3 Traffic -14.24 -23.49 17.41 37.52 3.17 5.22 -1.57 2.89 0.19

4 Water body 13.16 330.18 -0.77 -4.51 12.39 310.75 22.01 -0.35 11.10

5 Building 57.02 120.29 -18.85 -18.05 38.18 80.53 8.02 -1.39 2.88

6 Public

facilities 8.60 N.A. 0.04 0.45 8.63 N.A. N.A 0.03 N.A.

7 Recreation -27.71 -25.48 34.19 42.19 6.48 5.96 -1.70 3.25 0.21

8 Salt industries N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

9 Others -140.98 -68.40 -13.02 -19.98 -154.00 -74.71 -4.56 -1.54 -2.67

Total

Some major characteristics and changes observable in the NW sub-study area are::

Forest occupied more than 60% of the NW sub-study area in 1980, 1995, and 2008. There was also no salt industries here.

Traffic (road development) was slower, its coverage increase very little from 2.54% in 1980 to 2.67% in 2008, compared to in “Basin”

sub-study area with 7.23% area developed for traffic use.

Building land use was not dominant, only represented 3.59% of the NW area in 2008, when compared to 12.45% in Basin area. Clearly

urbanization, possibly attributable to the road development, had been faster in the Basin area.

Agriculture land use saw its area initially decreased 72.10% (or 14.76 coverage loss of the NW area) from 1980 to 1995, then more than

doubled (130.68%, or 7.46% increase in NW area coverage) in 2008.

Forest coverage increased by 19.13% in 1995 from 1980, then decreased by 8.25% (or 10.22% relative to its area in 1995) in 2008.

3.1 Land use change in “SW” sub-study area between 1980 and 1995.

SW

1980-1995 1995 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1980 CELL COUNTS 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 12847 52418 674 821 3111 307 3957 0 2151 76286

Forest 200 6575 205108 2453 956 5420 239 4335 0 4731 229817

Traffic 300 393 4184 1561 90 2540 136 212 0 358 9474

Water body 400 58 330 0 28 199 0 1 0 7 623

Building 500 289 2712 504 39 3116 410 237 0 100 7407

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 73 10629 1715 499 1423 251 2390 0 11 16991

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 1038 25764 323 247 484 0 1530 0 2820 32206

1995total 21273 301145 7230 2680 16293 1343 12662 0 10178

SW 1980-1995

AREA (ha)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 82.22 335.48 4.31 5.25 19.91 1.96 25.32 N.A. 13.77 488.23

Forest 200 42.08 1312.69 15.70 6.12 34.69 1.53 27.74 N.A. 30.28 1470.83

Traffic 300 2.52 26.78 9.99 0.58 16.26 0.87 1.36 N.A. 2.29 60.63

Water body 400 0.37 2.11 0.00 0.18 1.27 0.00 0.01 N.A. 0.04 3.99

Building 500 1.85 17.36 3.23 0.25 19.94 2.62 1.52 N.A. 0.64 47.40

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 0.47 68.03 10.98 3.19 9.11 1.61 15.30 N.A. 0.07 108.74

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 6.64 164.89 2.07 1.58 3.10 0.00 9.79 N.A. 18.05 206.12

1995total 136.15 1927.33 46.27 17.15 104.28 8.60 81.04 N.A. 65.14 2385.95

Change in 1995 -352.03 457.11 -14.24 13.16 57.02 8.60 -27.71 N.A. -140.98

SW 1980-1995

AREA (%)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1980total

Agriculture 100 16.84 68.71 0.88 1.08 4.08 0.40 5.19 N.A. 2.82 100.00

Forest 200 2.86 89.25 1.07 0.42 2.36 0.10 1.89 N.A. 2.06 100.00

Traffic 300 4.15 44.16 16.48 0.95 26.81 1.44 2.24 N.A. 3.78 100.00

Water body 400 9.31 52.97 0.00 4.49 31.94 0.00 0.16 N.A. 1.12 100.00

Building 500 3.90 36.61 6.80 0.53 42.07 5.54 3.20 N.A. 1.35 100.00

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 0.43 62.56 10.09 2.94 8.38 1.48 14.07 N.A. 0.06 100.00

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 3.22 80.00 1.00 0.77 1.50 0.00 4.75 N.A. 8.76 100.00

Change in 1995 -14.76 19.13 -0.60 0.55 2.39 0.36 -1.16 N.A. -5.91

The questionable transition of 44.16% traffic land use into forest cover, with only 16.48% persisted, was also revealed during

1980-1995 in SW area. There also seems to be high possibility of land use classification or mapping error in the land use map 1980,

considering the water body that only 4.49% of it remained water body in 1995, although landscape changes might influence such conversion to

some extent. Considerably high proportion (main distribution of change) of the agriculture (68.71%), building (36.61%), and recreation

(62.56%) were classified as forest in 1995.

3.2 Land use change in “SW” sub-study area between 1995 and 2008.

SW

1995-2008 2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1995 CELL COUNTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 8845 9480 613 281 1060 0 802 0 201 21282

Forest 20 30850 240195 3833 1302 5258 739 13163 0 5899 301239

Traffic 30 434 2665 3342 91 302 23 258 0 134 7249

Water body 40 608 745 115 525 166 6 483 0 32 2680

Building 50 3162 5297 1280 210 4928 228 748 0 464 16317

Public

facilities 60 256 331 61 0 353 323 0 0 19 1343

Recreation 70 3553 6043 559 31 733 23 1666 0 54 12662

Salt

industries 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 90 1386 5703 166 119 572 7 884 0 1341 10178

2008total 49094 270459 9969 2559 13372 1349 18004 0 8144

SW 1995-2008

AREA (ha)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 56.61 60.67 3.92 1.80 6.78 0.00 5.13 N.A. 1.29 136.20

Forest 20 197.44 1537.25 24.53 8.33 33.65 4.73 84.24 N.A. 37.75 1927.93

Traffic 30 2.78 17.06 21.39 0.58 1.93 0.15 1.65 N.A. 0.86 46.39

Water body 40 3.89 4.77 0.74 3.36 1.06 0.04 3.09 N.A. 0.20 17.15

Building 50 20.24 33.90 8.19 1.34 31.54 1.46 4.79 N.A. 2.97 104.43

Public facilities 60 1.64 2.12 0.39 0.00 2.26 2.07 0.00 N.A. 0.12 8.60

Recreation 70 22.74 38.68 3.58 0.20 4.69 0.15 10.66 N.A. 0.35 81.04

Salt industries 80 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 90 8.87 36.50 1.06 0.76 3.66 0.04 5.66 N.A. 8.58 65.14

2008total 314.20 1730.94 63.80 16.38 85.58 8.63 115.23 N.A. 52.12 2386.88

Change in 2008 178.00 -197.00 17.41 -0.77 -18.85 0.04 34.19 N.A. -13.02

SW 1995-2008

AREA (%)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1995total

Agriculture 10 41.56 44.54 2.88 1.32 4.98 0.00 3.77 N.A. 0.94 100.00

Forest 20 10.24 79.74 1.27 0.43 1.75 0.25 4.37 N.A. 1.96 100.00

Traffic 30 5.99 36.76 46.10 1.26 4.17 0.32 3.56 N.A. 1.85 100.00

Water body 40 22.69 27.80 4.29 19.59 6.19 0.22 18.02 N.A. 1.19 100.00

Building 50 19.38 32.46 7.84 1.29 30.20 1.40 4.58 N.A. 2.84 100.00

Public facilities 60 19.06 24.65 4.54 0.00 26.28 24.05 0.00 N.A. 1.41 100.00

Recreation 70 28.06 47.73 4.41 0.24 5.79 0.18 13.16 N.A. 0.43 100.00

Salt industries 80 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 90 13.62 56.03 1.63 1.17 5.62 0.07 8.69 N.A. 13.18 100.00

Change in 2008 7.46 -8.25 0.73 -0.03 -0.79 0.00 1.43 N.A. -0.55

Compared to the 15 years period from 1980 to 1995, the subsequent 13 years period until 2008 showed not only the trend of conversion to

forest of other land use types, but also higher (two digit percentage, except traffic) conversion to agriculture, leading to 7.46% increase of

agriculture area in 2008. The largest addition in area came from forest area (197.44 ha), followed by recreation area (22.74 ha), and building

(20.24 ha). It therefore calls for field investigation in the newly developed/classified agriculture area, as expansion of agriculture area has also

been the main driver of deforestation, especially in the SW part of the study area.

3.3 Land use change in “SW” sub-study area between 1980 and 2008.

SW

1980-2008 2008 Agriculture Forest Traffic

Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1980 CELL COUNTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 28570 39770 1454 505 2568 56 2468 0 895 76286

Forest 200 14199 204379 2961 1556 2999 279 1935 0 1507 229815

Traffic 300 744 2644 2306 29 2615 584 397 0 155 9474

Water body 400 80 214 5 176 62 0 38 0 48 623

Building 500 746 1643 710 12 3658 265 265 0 108 7407

Public

facilities 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Recreation 700 2574 7857 1753 93 1029 123 3559 0 3 16991

Salt

industries 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others 900 2181 13878 761 188 386 42 9342 0 5428 32206

2008total 49094 270385 9950 2559 13317 1349 18004 0 8144

SW 1980-2008

AREA (ha)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 182.85 254.53 9.31 3.23 16.44 0.36 15.80 N.A. 5.73 488.23

Forest 200 90.87 1308.03 18.95 9.96 19.19 1.79 12.38 N.A. 9.64 1470.82

Traffic 300 4.76 16.92 14.76 0.19 16.74 3.74 2.54 N.A. 0.99 60.63

Water body 400 0.51 1.37 0.03 1.13 0.40 0.00 0.24 N.A. 0.31 3.99

Building 500 4.77 10.52 4.54 0.08 23.41 1.70 1.70 N.A. 0.69 47.40

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 16.47 50.28 11.22 0.60 6.59 0.79 22.78 N.A. 0.02 108.74

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 13.96 88.82 4.87 1.20 2.47 0.27 59.79 N.A. 34.74 206.12

2008total 315.74 1730.46 63.68 16.38 85.23 8.63 115.23 N.A. 52.12 2385.93

Change in 2008 -174.03 260.11 3.17 12.39 38.18 8.63 6.48 N.A. -154.00

SW 1980-2008

AREA (%)

Agriculture Forest Traffic Water

body Building

Public

facilities Recreation

Salt

industries Others

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1980total

Agriculture 100 37.45 52.13 1.91 0.66 3.37 0.07 3.24 N.A. 1.17 100.00

Forest 200 6.18 88.93 1.29 0.68 1.30 0.12 0.84 N.A. 0.66 100.00

Traffic 300 7.85 27.91 24.34 0.31 27.60 6.16 4.19 N.A. 1.64 100.00

Water body 400 12.84 34.35 0.80 28.25 9.95 0.00 6.10 N.A. 7.70 100.00

Building 500 10.07 22.18 9.59 0.16 49.39 3.58 3.58 N.A. 1.46 100.00

Public facilities 600 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Recreation 700 15.15 46.24 10.32 0.55 6.06 0.72 20.95 N.A. 0.02 100.00

Salt industries 800 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

Others 900 6.77 43.09 2.36 0.58 1.20 0.13 29.01 N.A. 16.85 100.00

Change in 2008 -7.30 10.87 0.13 0.52 1.60 0.36 0.27 N.A. -6.46

Southwest

Southwest

Southwest

Note: Urbanisation is defined as conversion from non-urban land use to urban

land use (traffic, building, public facilities, and recreation).

Southwest

The map above also shows the areas where it was urban in 1995 and

remained/persisted as urban in 2008. The map shows whether the nature of

urbanization taking place was expansion of the existing urban area, or urban

development in new non-urban areas, although theoretically the latter was less

likely.

E. Conclusion and Recommendation

To conclude, this report has presented the land use change data for the ‘whole’,

‘basin’, and ‘SW’ (Southwest) subdivision of the study area, for the three periods i.e.

1980-1995, 1995-2008, and 1980-2008. Distribution of change has also been broken

down and an initial assessment and analysis was discussed. Several maps showing

four major themes of land use change i.e. deforestation, agricultural expansion,

afforestation, and urbanization has also been produced for 1995-2008 period, mainly

to visualize the location and pattern of each of the specific changes, hence further land

investigation can be directed to the areas of change shown in the maps.

Land use change analysis can be taken further to land use change modeling based

on Markovian chain, Cellular Automata, the combination CA_Markov, or the

agent-based simulation analysis. These models can be used to predict future land

use based on the past land use, and also by incorporating explanatory variables that

act as the driver of the land use change such as the dynamic road development.

Prediction models can also incorporate planning intervention (constraints and

incentives) such as areas designated as preserved forest which are restricted for urban

development. The author of this report is currently learning the Idrisi Selva software

that provides such modeling capabilities.