Nuclear Power Generation & Emergency Preparedness

  • Published on

  • View

  • Download

Embed Size (px)


Nuclear Power Generation & Emergency Preparedness. Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section. 103 Nuclear Power Reactors. Steam Engines. Outline. Electric Power Generation Why Nuclear? What About Accidents? Safety By Design and Operation What About Drill Scenarios?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


<ul><li><p>Nuclear Power Generation&amp; Emergency PreparednessHealth Physics SocietyPower Reactor Section</p></li><li><p>103 Nuclear Power Reactors</p></li><li><p>Steam Engines </p></li><li><p>HOW A NUCLEAR REACTOR WORKS</p></li><li><p>OutlineElectric Power Generation</p><p>Why Nuclear?</p><p>What About Accidents?</p><p>Safety By Design and Operation</p><p>What About Drill Scenarios?</p></li><li><p>Electricity: A Vital Resource</p></li><li><p>Sources of PowerSource: EIA - Updated 11/03(2002)</p></li><li><p>Pros &amp; ConsCOAL</p><p>HYDRO</p><p>NATURAL GAS</p><p>SOLAR &amp; WINDcheap and abundantbut source of greenhouse gases</p><p>cleanbut seasonal and no new sources</p><p>cleaner than coalbut limited supply</p><p>renewablebut expensive, low energy density, and intermittent </p></li><li><p>Why Nuclear?NUCLEAR</p><p>high energy density </p><p>no air pollution </p><p>small, contained waste </p><p>But what about</p><p>safety, security, and waste disposal ?</p></li><li><p> High Energy Density Each person in the United States uses either: 4 tons of coal or a few ounces of uranium</p><p>1 pellet = 150 gallons gasoline</p><p>1780 pounds coal</p><p>16,000 ft3 natural gas</p><p>2.5 tons wood</p></li><li><p>No Air Pollution </p></li><li><p>Waste Contained in Used Fuel Assemblies, Cooling-off In Pools</p></li><li><p>Loaded into Steel Containers, Stored in Concrete Casks</p></li><li><p>Steel Containers Buried Deep Underground </p></li><li><p>Waste Hazard Decreases Over Time </p></li><li><p>Nuclear Safety Record440 civil nuclear reactors in 30 countries sharing operating experiences (</p><p>Impressive safety record covering 12,000 reactor-years of operating experience</p><p>Two nuclear accidents:</p><p>TMI (1979)</p><p>Chernobyl (1986)</p></li><li><p>Three Mile Island (TMI)March 28th 1979, Unit 2 reactor trips at 4 AM.(The movie China Syndrome is playing in theaters)</p><p>Pressurer relief value sticks open, lose of cooling accident (LOCA) begins.</p><p>Hampered by inadequate training and instrumentation, operators shut off emergency core cooling.</p><p>By 6:30 AM, blocking value is closed, shutting off the loss of coolant but </p><p>The water level has fallen below the top of the reactor core. The fuel rods containing the uranium fuel pellets melt and release radioactive gas into the Containment Building.</p></li><li><p>TMI: Hydrogen BubbleWhen the fuel rods melt, hydrogen gas is generated.</p><p>A bubble of hydrogen gas collects in the reactor head.</p><p>Fear that the hydrogen could explode result in confusion, panic. About 150,000 people evacuate.</p><p>However, the hydrogen explosion was never possible (not enough oxygen)</p><p>Major lessons: </p><p>Better operator training Better emergency planning </p></li><li><p>TMI: ConsequencesNo one killed, no one injured.</p><p>Offsite radiation is minimal, a small fraction of natural background radiation.</p><p>Public confidence is severely damaged.</p><p>Many health effects studies have been conducted. In 1996, a U.S. District Court dismisses all lawsuits finding no evidence of harm.</p><p>Improvements to operator training, instrumentation, and emergency plans are now required.</p></li><li><p>Chernobyl</p></li><li><p>ChernobylApril 1986 disaster at Chernobyl in the Ukraine was a result of a dangerous reactor design and weak operational controls.</p><p>Weak Operational Control:</p><p>Poorly trained operators were performing a dangerous and unauthorized test.</p><p>Dangerous Reactor Design:</p><p>A positive temperature coefficient of reactivity resulted in a huge power surge that cause water to flash to steam, blowing the cover plate off the top of the reactor</p><p>Broken pipes spilled water onto the hot graphite moderator, which bursts into flames.</p></li><li><p>Flawed Reactor Design graphite core &amp; unstable reactor</p></li><li><p>Environmental Pathways 82% of the iodine exposure was avoidable</p></li><li><p>Chernobyl: Consequences31 workers, mostly fire fighters are killed largely due to acute radiation exposure. </p><p>Huge release of radioactive material, distributed around Europe. </p><p>World confidence is severely damaged.</p><p>The Whole Health Organization has linked hundreds of child thyroid cancers to the accident (10 deaths), but no detectable increase in other cancers.</p><p>The greatest damage was from fear (psychological), NOT radiation.</p></li><li><p>Can Chernobyl Happen Here?Reactor Design: Apples &amp; Oranges</p><p>Positive temperature coefficients of reactivity</p><p>Graphite core that catches fire and burns for days </p><p>No containment building</p><p>Institutional Controls: Apples &amp; Oranges</p><p>No strict operating license</p><p>No strict regulatory oversight</p><p>Lesson: Never Take Safety For Granted</p></li><li><p>Nuclear Safety</p><p>Design and Construction</p><p>Operation and Training</p></li><li><p>Safety By Design: Low Enrichment</p><p>Fission chain reaction: E = m * c2</p><p>U-235 atoms fission. 5% in fuel, 95% in bombs.</p></li><li><p>Safety By Design: Fuel RodsTypical values:</p><p>The uranium fuel is made of solid ceramic pellets.</p><p>The fuel pellets are sealed inside 13 long zirconium alloy rods.</p><p>236 rods in each assembly</p><p>217 assemblies in the reactor core</p></li><li><p>Safety By Design: Reactor VesselTypical values:</p><p>Weight: 400 tons</p><p>Thickness: 8 inchesFuel Assemblies (Core)</p></li><li><p> Safety By Design: PWR ContainmentInitial Construction</p><p> Completed Concrete Dome</p></li><li><p>Layers of Protection Against 9/11</p></li><li><p>Safety By Design: Reactor Control</p><p>Automatic shutdown system relies on gravity</p><p>Negative temperature &amp; pressure coefficients of reactivity*</p><p>Controls rods maintain maximum shutdown potential</p></li><li><p>Safety By Design:Redundant Safety Systems</p><p>Reactivity Control</p><p>Core Heat Removal</p><p>RCS Inventory Control</p><p>RCS Heat Removal</p><p>Containment Isolation</p></li><li><p>Regulatory ControlNuclear Regulatory Commission Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland(</p></li><li><p>NRC Regulatory Functions</p></li><li><p>This IS Rocket ScienceFinal Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)</p><p>Volume 15: Accident Analysis</p><p>Design Basis Accidents (Worst Case Scenarios):</p><p>Loss of Cooling Accident (LOCA)</p><p>Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR)</p></li><li><p>What Can Get Released?Noble gas fission products</p><p>Chemically inert (xenon)</p><p>Volatile fission products</p><p>Chemically reactive (iodine)</p><p>All other fission products</p><p>Remain in solid form</p></li><li><p>Beyond Worst Case ScenariosEP drills must exercise the emergency plan, requiring an unbelievable sequence of events.</p><p>Nuclear Engineering uses the science of:</p><p>Probabilistic Risk Assessment</p><p>Probability of an typical EP Scenario:</p><p>1 in 10 billion</p></li><li><p>SummaryBenefits of nuclear power include no air pollution and low volume of contained waste.</p><p>Were here today because of the lessons-learned at TMI.</p><p>Because of differences in design, the Chernobyl disaster has little relevance to the safety of U.S. nuclear power plants.</p><p>U.S. nuclear plants are safe through design, operation, and strict regulatory control.</p><p>EP Drills must use unrealistic scenarios to exercise our Emergency Plan.</p></li><li><p>Thanksfor your interest and patience !</p><p>The United States has 103 nuclear power reactors in 31 states. </p><p>Nuclear energy is the second largest source providing electricity for one of every five homes and business in the country and in California.</p><p>Some states clearly are more dependent on nuclear energy than others. Vermont gets 76 percent of its electricity from nuclear reactors New Hampshire and South Carolina well over 50 percent. </p><p>About 90% of all electric power is generated by boiling water. The only with nuclear power is the heat source. The fact is more than 50% of our electric power in the United States comes from burning coal. Nuclear power is the second largest source, contributing about 20%. Natural gas and hydro take care of most of the rest. </p><p>Coal can meet our future energy needs but global warming is the big question mark.</p><p>Realistically, no new sources of hydro power can be expected.</p><p>Natural gas is cleaner than coal, producing only the greenhouse gases, there is not enough supply.</p><p>Solar and wind are renewable but they are expensive and intermittent. Unfortunately, they are not suited to produce the bulk of our energy needs.</p><p>Solar and wind are low density sources. To supply a major with solar power, youd need an area about twice the size an the city.</p><p>In contrast, nuclear is high density. San Onofre supplies 2.3 million homes. </p><p>Ignoring the occasional shutdown, San Onofre runs pretty much 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year at 100% power. Supplying enough power for over 2 million homes in Southern California. After running for about 2 years, the plant shuts down with the tank still full. </p><p>Think about it this way, the average person in the U.S. uses roughly 4-tons of coal or or a few ounces of uranium each year.</p><p>More than two-thirds of our electricity is created by burning fossil fuels. The rest of Americas electricity is emission-freeand three-fourths of that comes from nuclear power plants. </p><p>Nuclear plants do emit trivial amounts of radioactivityand so do other large industrial facilities including coal plants. But these levels do not harm public health or the environment.</p><p>By replacing electricity generation from other fuels, nuclear energy reduces the volume of air emissions that cause smog and acid rain. They also reduce greenhouse gas emissionsthe most important of which is carbon dioxide.</p><p>Clean Air Energy. Of all energy sources, nuclear energy has perhaps the smallest impact on the environment, compared to the amount of energy it produces. Nuclear produces the most energy compared to its environmental footprint.</p><p>Finland, for instance, is building a new nuclear plant in response to growing electricity demand. The decision was made after Finland acknowledged it would be impossible to achieve the Kyoto targets without economic hardship unless it added nuclear capacity.When a reactor is refueled, the removed fuel assemblies are immediately placed in used fuel pools, where they cool under water for many years and become less radioactive. But used fuel pools were not intended as permanent storage. The Department of Energy is supposed to build a permanent underground storage facility for used fuel from nuclear power plants and high-level radioactive waste from defense programs. Over the past two years, we have seen evidence of strong political support in the series of decisions to move forward with the Yucca Mountain project. The president reached a formal determination that the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada was suitable for used fuel disposal, and both houses of Congress affirmed that determination.</p><p>Having made that decision to move forward with the Yucca Mountain project, we saw a determined commitment during 2003 to implement that decision. </p><p>The Department of Energy is developing the transportation infrastructure necessary to move used fuel from plant sites to a central disposal facility.</p><p>And at the end of this year, we expect DOE to submit its license application to the NRC. The NRC will review that application over the next three years. If the schedule holds, we should see NRC issue a construction authorization in 2007. The repository is expected to begin accepting waste in 2010.</p><p>This is a graphic of a reactors containmentor physical protection--system. Containment buildings are among the strongest structures built by man. Steel-lined, 3 feet or more of reinforced concrete. The reinforcing steel bars in the structures are 2.5 3 inches in diameter. The containment is a tightly meshed steel cage filled with concrete. Its very strong. (Note the slide features)</p><p>The deliberate attack on a plant by a large commercial aircraft was never contemplated in the design and construction of nuclear plants. We cannot state that any plant could withstand such an impact under any circumstances. The effects of such an attack have not been analyzed. </p><p>However, we have not ignored the potential for aircraft accidents. In those cases where accident scenarios were deemed possiblethough remotethose particular plants were, and continue to be, monitored. In three cases, specific analysis was conducted for the FB-111 fighter bomber, a commercial jetthe 727 series and general aviation aircraftand the Lear Jet.</p><p>While the large aircraft747, 757 and the likehave not specifically been evaluated, we do have a great deal of knowledge about the behavior of the concrete structures. Some testing has been conducted to evaluate the behavior of concrete structures. </p></li></ul>


View more >