12

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,
Page 2: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Safet

The rewards are many. The risks are

relatively small, and they can be reduced by

good planning. That is the way people should

assess nuclear power.”

Rudolph GiulianiFormer New York Mayor Nov. 17, 2003

Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities—massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

extensive security programs, federally licensed operators, and dailyoversight by resident inspectors from the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission.

Although nuclear plants are safe, with excellent operating records,we know that accidents can happen. To protect our workers, their families and the public, we devote extensive resources to planning our emergency response to operational and security-related events.

The nuclear energy industry’s commitment to excellence, combinedwith continual training and testing, has produced an unparalleled levelof emergency preparedness in America’s industrial sector.

There are two basic steps in nuclear plant emergency preparedness.First, do what it takes to keep the plant safe. Second, determine in advance what to do if an event requires an emergency response. This booklet discusses both steps.

Page 3: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness

Nuclear Plant Safety: Defense in Depth

Cutaway illustration of a typical power reactor.

Fuel Assemblies

ContainmentStructure

Reactor

Reactor Vessel

ty

Nuclear power plants are built with “defense-in-depth” safety design and construction.

• The structure containing the reactor—called the containment building—is made of 4-foot-thick, steel-reinforced concrete. The reactor itself is housed in a massive steel vessel 4 to 8 inches thick and weighing more than 300 tons.

• Redundant safety systems are designed to maintain reactor safety at all times. This redundancy ensures that every measure taken to keep a plant safe can be done in two or more ways.

• Federally licensed operators ensure safe plant operation. These highlytrained professionals train one week out of every five, and they mustrequalify for their licenses every two years. NRC regulations also require operators to participate in emergency preparedness drills and exercises.

Page 4: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Federal Regulations and Emergency Planning Zones

Regulations

The NRC Operations Center,

located at its headquarters in Rockville,

Md., is continually staffed with qualified

personnel, who have the expertise and

ability to evaluate events and alert NRC

management other federal partners

and licensees, as necessary to properly

respond to unfolding events. ...

The NRC is capable of responding to

multiple events, affecting multiple

plants at the same time.”

Nils DiazNRC Chairman

PHOTO COURTESY OF NRC

F ederal law requires every U.S. nuclearpower plant to maintain and regularly

exercise a detailed emergency preparednessplan to protect the public in the event of anaccident at the facility. The NRC and the statesin which the plants are located approve theseplans. The NRC also coordinates with theFederal Emergency Management Agency.Each plant conducts a full-scale exercise everytwo years—involving federal, state and localofficials—and conducts additional drillsbetween these exercises.

The Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee—including represen-tatives from the NRC, FEMA and the Environ-mental Protection Agency—developed thebasis for a radiological emergency program in 1978.

The committee’s task force determined that a 10-mile radius around a nuclear powerplant—illustrated on the center foldout— is an appropriate emergency planning zone(EPZ) in the event of a release of radioactivityfrom the reactor. The federal task force con-cluded that the public beyond the 10-mileradius of a nuclear plant is not at risk fromdirect exposure to any radioactive materialsthat may be released. However, authorities

would take protective measures for other populations as needed.

A nuclear plant’s emergencyresponse plan must provide protec-

tive measures, such as sheltering,evacuation or consideration of distributing potassium iodide—

which can protect the thyroid from radioactive iodine—for communities within 10 miles of the plant.

In the event of an emergency, dedicated

lines feed key plant operating data into

the NRC emergency operations center.

Page 5: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness

This 10-mile area is divided into several sec-tors, each resembling a slice of pie. During anincident at a nuclear power plant, the chiefsector of interest is the sector downwind ofthe plant. If a significant radioactive releasewere to occur, it would travel in the prevailingwind direction. Radioactivity in this air mass,or plume, would disperse to extremely low concentrations as distance from the plantincreases.

If evacuation were necessary, emergencyresponders would focus on individuals most atrisk of direct exposure to a radioactive release:nonessential plant personnel and residentswithin a two-mile radius of the plant, as well asthose within five miles of the plant in thedownwind sector. This is known as the “key-hole approach” to implementing protectiveactions.

Each year, the companies that operatenuclear plants provide vital information for residents, special needs populations, business-es, schools and other institutions, and touristvenues within 10 miles of each nuclear plant.

This information explains how state and localauthorities will notify them in the event of an emergency at the nuclear plant and whatprotective measures they should take. Thematerials also provide basic information about radiation and its health effects.

The primary source for possible radioactiveexposure to people beyond the 10-mile zoneis through the food chain. The task forceestablished a 50-mile radius to limit publicexposure to radioactive materials through contaminated water, milk or food. State and local government plans are in place to support imple-mentation of protective actions in the 50-mile zone around each nuclear power plant should that become necessary.

PHOTO COURTESY OFWOLF CREEK NUCLEAR

OPERATING CO.

ulations Training, teamwork and practice: Above, a community

medical team participates in a drill.

Page 6: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Nuclear power plant emergency plans havea broad reach, involving at least 200

employees at each plant. NRC, state and localgovernment and emergency response offi-cials—including fire departments, law enforce-ment and traffic control authorities—also areincluded in the company’s plan and partici-pate in periodic exercises to demonstrate theplan’s viability.

Ongoing communication and regular drillsand exercises ensure that plant personnel andthe community’s emergency response organi-zations are a finely honed team.

Roles and Responsibilities of Emergency RespondersIn the event of a nuclear plant emergency, thecompany operating the plant classifies theevent on an NRC-established scale and notifieslocal, state and federal emergency organiza-tions within 15 minutes. The company alsorecommends protective actions for the publicnear the plant.

State and local officials are responsible foremergency response planning, public notifica-tion and implementing protective actions, ifneeded.

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness

Nuclear Plant Emergency Planning:Teamwork in Action

Our emergency response

defines the public’s trust in us and our

ability to do business going forward.

That makes emergency preparedness

a critical function that deserves

attention from the highest levels of

management.”

Barnie BeasleyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Southern Nuclear Operating Co.

PHOTO COURTESY OF DOMINION GENERATION TeamworkNuclear plant staff and local

emergency responders drill together to ensure close coordination.

Page 7: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

In an emergency, local and state emergencyresponse organizations would confirm theseverity of the event and determine what protective actions to take for residents within 10 miles of the plant. They must be able to activate notification systems within 15 minutes of learning about a situation requiring action.

The NRC staffs a 24/7 emergency responsecenter. The NRC chairman or another commis-sioner is on call at all times to coordinate theagency’s response to any emergency.

Under the Department of HomelandSecurity’s National Response Plan, federalresources will be made available if needed by state and local emergency response organizations.

Nuclear Plant Event ClassificationsThe NRC established a classification scale fornuclear power plant events to ensure consis-tency in communications and response.

• A notification of unusual event, the lowestclassification, means that a minor plantevent—either an operational event or securitythreat—has occurred, but no radiation releaseis expected.

• An alert means that there is an actual orpotential reduction in the plant’s safety level or a security event that could threaten site personnel or damage plant equipment. Noradiation release is expected.

• A site area emergency suggests a more serious event. Major safety equipment eitherhas failed or is deemed likely to fail.There is the potential for a minor radiation release that would not exceed EPA safety standards.

• A general emergency is the most seriousevent. In this instance, radiation may leak out-side the plant and beyond the plant boundary.

The only general emergency that has everbeen declared at a U.S. nuclear power plantwas the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania. The most recentsite area emergency occurred in 1996.

Evacuation and ShelteringThe company that operates a nuclear plant isresponsible for recommending to local gov-ernment officials protective actions for thepublic in the event of an emergency at the

work

PHOTO COURTESY OF NRC

NRC reactor safety experts and communicators work as a team

during a nuclear plant emergency exercise.

Page 8: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness

facility. Local officials then determine whatactions to take.

• The primary protective actions are evacua-tion and sheltering to protect residents fromany type of radioactive exposure.

• If there were a radioactive release, the mostprobable exposures would come from radioac-tive noble gases. These gases do not concen-trate in the body.

• The company involved must consider recommending the use of potassium iodidewithin the 10-mile zone, although it is stateand local governments that decide whether to stockpile and use it. Potassium iodide canprotect the thyroid gland in the event of aradioactive iodine release from the plant.However, it does not protect any other part of the body, or against any other type ofradioactivity.

Examining Evacuation SafetyA 2004 study by Sandia National Laboratoryfound that large-scale evacuations are “veryeffective and successfully save lives and reducethe potential number of injuries associatedwith the hazard.” The finding held truewhether the evacuations were planned or ad hoc.

Starting with a sample of 230 large-scaleevacuations between 1990 and 2003, Sandiaselected 50 for detailed case studies. Theyincluded five evacuations of more than100,000 people, ranging from 270,000 to666,000, both for hurricanes. One of the fivewas the Sept. 11, 2001, evacuation of lowerManhattan after the attack on the World TradeCenter. The 50 detailed case studies alsoincluded 33 evacuations dealing with techno-logical hazards. No radiological-related evacu-ations occurred during the time frame coveredby the study.

The study found that close coordinationamong emergency responders, training andexercises contribute to the effectiveness ofevacuations. All 50 communities providedtraining to their emergency response personnel; 40 percent conducted full-scale exercises.

The only event at a U.S. nuclear plant that has required full-scale emergencyresponse was the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island. However, local government officials have successfully used the emergency response plans developed by the nuclear industry in other emergencies.

Here are two examples:

• The evacuation of 10,000 people from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in 1985, following a fire at a city-operated sewage treatment plant thatdispersed a cloud of toxic fumes over the city.State and local officials used a draft plan developed for the Duane Arnold nuclear plant.

• The evacuation of 17,000 residents of St. Charles Parish, La., following a leak from a nearby chemical plant in 1982. State and local officials worked from a draft plan forEntergy’s Waterford 3 nuclear plant, which was not yet operating.

Traffic control authorities train and drill as part of the nuclear plant

emergency response team.

Page 9: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Regulatory Oversight ofEmergency Preparedness

When a [protective action]

recommendation comes from the plant,

it has been researched and looked at by

some good people. And their families

live in our emergency planning zone.”

Ned WrightDirector, Linn County (Iowa)

Emergency Management

The NRC is responsible for safety oversight ofnuclear power plants. The agency assessesreactor performance through a combinationof inspections and data on 18 performanceindicators. Three of these indicators pertain toemergency preparedness:

• emergency preparedness/drill and exerciseperformance

• the percentage of emergency responseorganization members who have participatedin a drill or exercise

• the working order of alert and notificationsystem sirens, as measured by periodic testing.

Every reactor receives at least 2,500 hoursper year of NRC inspection, a portion of whichis allocated to a review of the facility’s compli-ance with emergency preparedness regula-tions. The NRC assesses its findings fromthese inspections to determine their safetysignificance.

The NRC posts the results for each per-formance indicator—along with inspectionfindings—on its Web site at www.nrc.gov.

PHOTO COURTESY OF DOMINION GENERATION

Although nuclear plants are safe,federal law requires each plant

to maintain and regularly test an emergency plan.

Page 10: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness

When Hurricane Katrina—a Category 4storm—struck the Gulf Coast in 2005, it

directly affected two nuclear power plants inLouisiana and one in Mississippi. None of theplants experienced any significant damage orflooding.

Entergy’s River Bend plant near BatonRouge, La., and Grand Gulf plant near Jackson,Miss., safely produced electricity throughoutthe storm. The company’s Waterford plant inSt. Charles Parish near New Orleans shut downin advance of the storm, and the NRC author-ized it to restart less than two weeks later.

Waterford’s emergency planning proce-dures allowed Entergy personnel to coordinateclosely with St. Charles and St. John parishemergency preparedness officials and themanagers of other local industrial facilities.This protocol has been enhanced over years of training and exercising the emergency plan.

After the storm, recovery in St. CharlesParish was enhanced by the high level ofexpertise and cooperation demonstrated by local public officials and emergencyresponders.

Nuclear power plants are among the fewpower sources unaffected by destruction ofsurrounding infrastructure, interruptions in

the transportation of fuel and other factors.Because nuclear power plants refuel

every 18 to 24 months, they can operate despite prolonged interrup-

tions that impact fuel supplies for other sources.

Nuclear Power Plants And Hurricane Katrina

Emergency preparedness

is a partnership. ... Thousands of first

responders from local communities

make emergency preparedness work

at the grass-roots level.”

Eric LeedsDirector NRC, Division of Preparedness

and Response

State-of-the-art technology,at left, enables the NRC to track

weather systems that might affect nuclear plant operations.

At right, Entergy repairs power lines after Hurricane Katrina.

PHOTO COURTESYOF NRC

© ENTERGY CORPORATION

Page 11: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

GP 0070Dec 2005

The Nuclear Energy Institute is an industry policy organization that fosters the beneficial uses of nuclear technologies worldwide.

The Institute’s members include leading universities, research laboratories, radiopharmaceutical and radioisotope manufacturers, companies that operate commercial nuclear power plants,

their suppliers, labor unions and others.

1776 I Street, NW Suite 400

Washington, DC 20006-3708 Phone: 202.739.8000

Fax: 202.785.4019 www.nei.org

Page 12: Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness · Nuclear power plants are among the strongest industrial facilities— massive concrete and steel structures with backup safety systems,

Milk and Livestock

Fish and Water

10-mile radius

2-mile radius

5 miles downwind

Crops and Soil

Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Preparedness

In the event of an accident that releasesradioactivity, specially trained personnel

would sample water, milk, soil, crops, livestockand buildings within a 50-mile radius of theplant to determine if any of the material was deposited. If so, they would quarantinecontaminated water, milk and food (including livestock feed), and clean up any contamination.

The federal government established a 10-mile emergency planning zone around

each nuclear power plant to protect the public in the event of a serious reactor accident. Ifevacuation were necessary, emergency respon-ders would focus initially on those citizens likely to be exposed to a potential radioactiverelease: those within a two-mile radius of theplant, as well as those five miles downwind.This is known as the “keyhole approach.”

Protecting Our Neighbors: Federal Emergency Planning Zones