Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Data Suppl Submitted to
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND T1.1 Proposals Received by Tele1.2 Proposals and Nights by Us1.3 Data Charts, 4 1.4 Data Tables, 12
2 SCHEDULED PROGRAMS AND2.1 Categories of Investigators,2.2 Ph.D. Theses Supported by2.3 Fraction of the Community2.4 Data Charts, 18 2.5 Data Tables, 26 2.6 State Demographics of U.S
Time via NOAO TAC (200
3 PUBLICATIONS AND CITATIO
4 DATA ARCHIVE AND ACCESS
5 NATURE OF FACILITY AND U5.1 Facilities, 35 5.2 Unique Capabilities, 36
6 PARTNERSHIPS AND SERVIC6.1 Partnerships, 38 6.2 Service to the Community, 6.3 Software Provided by NOA6.4 Value Added Infrastructure
7 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH7.1 Programs and Activities: e.
Community Engagement, C7.2 Kitt Peak Visitor Center, 397.3 Participants in Sponsored P7.4 Press Releases, Media Even7.5 Other Publications, Web Pr7.6 REU Program – Number an7.7 RET Program – Number an
‡ The contents of this document correspond toprograms relevant to the upcoming NSF review the Future: Transforming the Ground-based O/IR(http://www.noao.edu/dir/ seniorreview/srnoao.pd
NOAO METRICS ement to the NSF Senior Review the National Science Foundation
August 23, 2005
CONTENTS‡
............................................................................................ 1
ELESCOPE SUBSCRIPTION RATES ................................... 2 scope and Semester (2000A – 2005B), 2 er Category, 3
USERS................................................................................... 16 16 NOAO Telescopes, 16 Served, 17
. PI’s/Co-I’s and Top Ten Institutions Awarded 0A–2005B), 20
NS............................................................................................ 31
................................................................................................. 33
NIQUE CAPABILITIES ......................................................... 35
E TO THE COMMUNITY ....................................................... 38
38 O to the Community, 38 . 38
................................................................................................. 39 g., Teacher Enhancement, urriculum Development, 39 rograms, Tours, etc., 40 ts, Media Products or Resources Provided, 41 esence, and Usage, 42 d Demographics of Student Participants, 42 d Demographics of Teacher Participants, 42
a specific request for supplemental data on certain NOAO facilities and of senior facilities. NOAO’s formal report to the senior review, “Focus on System,” was submitted to NSF on July 29, 2005 f).
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The metrics reported in this document demonstrate the success of the NOAO program and its effective evolution. A large fraction of the astronomical community (and a very large fraction of the optical/IR community) looks to NOAO to provide unique or highly-sought-after capabilities, strictly on a peer-review basis. Specifically, the metrics in this document show:
Oversubscription rates are healthy and have remained healthy for all telescope categories,
even while access (the number of nights available on any particular telescope) has evolved (Section 1). Internally, this metric is used to guide decisions about capabilities that NOAO chooses to offer.
In the context of the ground-based O/IR system, many capabilities offered by NOAO are
unique or complementary, or represent the only peer-reviewed access to capabilities that the community finds very desirable (Sections 1.5).
NOAO provides important access to researchers from a set of diverse institutions—large
and small, private and public—from nearly all U.S. states and territories, including, notably, many institutions that have their own facilities (Section 2.4). This fact derives from the effort to develop complementary and unique capabilities. Usage of NOAO facilities is highly dominated by U.S. researchers (Section 2.1).
NOAO capabilities play a vital role in U.S. education in astronomy. Many students, including undergraduates, gain observing and research experience at NOAO facilities. We estimate that, on an annual basis, as many as 40–50 Ph.D. theses in astronomy rely on observing data obtained on NOAO telescopes, and these observations are not limited to the large telescopes. This represents a substantial fraction of the Ph.D.s granted each year by U.S. universities (Section 2.2).
The NOAO-developed and -supported infrastructure provides added value to tenant facilities (Section 6 here and Appendix C in our Senior Review submission http://www.noao.edu/dir/ seniorreview/srnoao.pdf). Many types of partnerships exist between NOAO and the community, including collaborative observational programs, sharing or provision of software, and services for data management or proposal processing.
The NOAO outreach program is both active and diverse (Section 7). Emphasis on creating educational programs to train teachers has resulted in dramatic leveraging of the resources invested.
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 1
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
1.1 Proposals Received by Telescope and Semester (2000A –2005B)
The charts on the following pages depict proposal and subscription data over 12 semesters for each of the eight telescopes, telescope groupings, or special programs through which NOAO allocates time,1 namely:
(1) TSIP/FIP Telescopes: The telescopes of the private (non-federally-funded) observatories that provide limited public access under the Telescopes System Instrumentation Program (TSIP) and its predecessor, the Facilities Instrumentation Program (FIP). Currently, these include Keck I, Keck II, Hobby-Eberly Telescope, MMT, Magellan 1, and Magellan 2. Note that not all of these telescopes are available to public access in any given semester, and that only a dozen or so nights are available on each telescope. [Charts (1)a–(1)e]
(2) Twin Gemini Telescopes: Gemini North and Gemini South. The U.S. community has access to approximately 50% of the science time on each of these 8-meter telescopes. [Charts (2)a–(2)e]
(3) Mayall 4-meter Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO): The U.S. community has access to 80% of Mayall time; 20% is assigned to the University of Maryland [Charts (3)a–(3)e]
(4) WIYN 3.5-meter Telescope at KPNO: The U.S. community has access to approximately 40% of the time on WIYN [Charts (4)a–(4)e]
(5) Blanco 4-meter Telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO): With 10% of available time granted to Chilean proposers through their own allocation process, the U.S. community has access to approximately 90% of Blanco time. [Charts (5)a–(5)e]
(6) SOAR 4.1-meter Telescope at CTIO. NOAO will have access to approximately 30% of the time on this telescope when it is in full operation. A small number of shared-risk proposals were solicited starting in semester 2005A. [Charts (6)a–(6)e]
(7) KP Small Telescopes: the KP 2.1-meter and the KP 0.9-meter on which 10% of the time is available through NOAO. At the start of the period of these metrics, time was also available on the Coudé Feed. [Charts (7)a–(7)e]
(8) CT Small Telescopes: the CT 1.5-meter, the CT 1.3-meter (formerly the 2MASS telescope), the CT 1.0-meter, the CT 0.9-meter, and the Curtis Schmidt. The first four of these are now run by the SMARTS consortium; NOAO has access to 25% of the time on each. Not all of these telescopes have been available in every semester; the Curtis Schmidt is no longer available for public access. [Charts (8)a–(8)e]
1 In all cases, proposal data reported here refer to the peer-reviewed observing proposals submitted to and selected via the NOAO-sponsored Telescope Allocation (TAC) process. Proposal data for what might be termed “non-NOAO” telescope time—i.e., the 10% time available to Chilean proposers on facilities at CTIO, the 20% of KPNO 4-m time guaranteed to University of Maryland proposers in exchange for instrumentation and operations resources, the time on NOAO telescopes granted to HST, SIRTF, or Chandra proposers by their respective TACs through the joint NASA-NOAO programs—are not included in the present report.
2 SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
1.2 Proposals Received and Nights Requested by User Category
In the charts on the following pages, the number of proposals received for each telescope (five charts for each telescope listed above) have been broken out as follows:
Number of proposals received:
by NOAO staff PIs and non-staff PIs by PIs at U.S. and non-U.S. institutions
Number of nights requested 2:
by NOAO staff and non-staff PIs by PIs at U.S. and non-U.S. institutions
Telescope subscription ratio:
Total nights requested/Total nights available for science.
The numbers for “Nights Available for Science” on each telescope (with the exception of Gemini data which is estimated by the International Gemini Observatory at the start of each semester) are those that were actually scheduled for scientific observations.
Spreadsheets showing the 12 semesters of data collected for this report are also included .
2 Note that NOAO survey proposals, which are not solicited every semester, often request time over several semesters. These have been included in the statistics with the nights applied to the semester in which they would be assigned if the survey were approved.
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 3
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
4 SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
(1)-b. TSIP/FIP Proposals Received
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
U.S. non-U.S.
(1)-c. TSIP/FIP Nights Requested
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Staff Non-Staff
(1)-a. TSIP/FIP Proposals Received
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-staff
Staff
(1)-e. TSIP/FIP Nights Requested
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
U.S. non-U.S.
(1)-c. TSIP/FIP Subscription
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 5
(2)-a. Gemini Proposals Received
0
50
100
150
200
250
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-staff
Staff
(2)-b.Gemini Proposals Received
0
50
100
150
200
250
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-U.S.
U.S.
(2)-d. Gemini: Nights Requested
0
50
100
150
200
250300
350
400
450
500
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Non-Staff
Staff
(2)-e. Gemini: Nights Requested
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
edNon-U.S.
U.S.
(2)-c. Gemini Subscription Rates
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2000A 2001A 2002A 2003A 2004A 2005A
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
4 SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
(3)-a. Mayall 4-m: Proposals Received
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-staffStaff
(3)-b. Mayall 4-m: Proposals Received
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-U.S.U.S.
(3)-d. Mayall 4-m: Nights Requested
050
100150200250300350400450
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Non-StaffStaff
(3)-e. Mayall 4-m: Nights Requested
050
100150200250300350400450
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
edNon-U.S.U.S.
(3)-c. Mayall 4-m: Subscription Rates
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
(4)-a. WIYN Proposals Received
05
101520253035404550
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Staff Non-staff
(4)-b. WIYN Proposals Received
05
101520253035404550
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
U.S. Non-U.S.
(4)-d. WIYN Nights Requested
020406080
100120140160180200
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Staff Non-staff (4)-e. WIYN Nights Requested
020406080
100120140160180200
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
U.S. Non-U.S.
(4)-c. WIYN Subscription Rates
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
8 Senior Review Metrics Supplement
(5)-a. Blanco 4m: Proposals
020406080
100120
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
# P
ropo
sals
Staff Non-staff
(5)-b. Blanco 4m: Proposals
020406080
100120
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
# P
ropo
sals
U.S. Non-U.S.
(5)-d. Blanco 4m: Nights Requested
0
100
200
300
400
500
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
# N
ight
s
Staff Non-staff
(5)-e. Blanco 4m: Nights Requested
0
100
200
300
400
500
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
# N
ight
s
U.S. Non-U.S.
(5)-c. Blanco 4m: Subscription
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
(6)-a SOAR Proposals Received
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2000
A
2000
B
2001
A
2001
B
2002
A
2002
B
2003
A
2003
B
2004
A
2004
B
2005
A
2005
B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-staffStaff
(6)-b. SOAR Proposals Received
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-U.S.U.S.
(6)-d. SOAR Nights Requested
05
1015202530
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed Non-staffStaff
(6)-e. SOAR Nights Requested
05
1015202530
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Non-U.S.U.S.
(6)-c. SOAR Subscription Rates
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 9
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
(7)-a. KP Small Telescopes: Proposals
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-staffStaff
(7)-b. KP Small Telescopes: Proposals
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-U.S.U.S.
(7)-d. KP Small Telescopes: Nights
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nig
hts
Req
uest
ed
Non-staffStaff
(7)-e. KP Small Telescopes: Nights
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nig
hts
Req
uest
ed
Non-U.S.U.S.
(7)-c. KP Small Telescopes: Subscription
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
10 SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 11
(8)-a. CT Small Telescopes: Proposals
0102030405060708090
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-staffStaff
(8)-b. CT Small Telescopes: Proposals
0102030405060708090
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
No.
of P
ropo
sals
Non-U.S.U.S.
(8)-d. CT Small Telescopes:Nights
0100200300400500600700
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Non-staffStaff
(8)-e. CT Small Telescopes: Nights
0
100200
300400500600
700
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
uest
ed
Non-U.S.U.S.
(8)-c. CT Small Telescopes: Subscription
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2000
A20
00B
2001
A20
01B
2002
A20
02B
2003
A20
03B
2004
A20
04B
2005
A20
05B
Nts
Req
/Nts
Ava
il
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
1.4 Data Tables
Semester 2000A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 1 NA 5 4 8 NA 8 17
# Non-Staff Proposals 25 NA 100 41 93 NA 97 60
# U.S. Proposals 24 NA 91 39 87 NA 90 69
# Non-U.S. Proposals 2 NA 14 6 14 NA 15 8
Nts Requested Staff 3 NA 28 13 20.5 NA 45 132.5
Nts Requested Non-Staff 72 NA 369.6 95.7 332.4 NA 595.7 473.9
Nts Requested U.S. 70 NA 345.1 97.7 312.4 NA 536.7 566.4
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 5 NA 53 11 40.5 NA 104 40
Nts Available 11 NA 140 62 122 NA 341 225
Total Req/Avail 6.82 NA 2.68 2.36 3.19 NA 1.86 1.87
Semester 2000B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 0 7 2 4 5 NA 7 9
# Non-Staff Proposals 21 71 97 38 104 NA 59 62
# U.S. Proposals 18 78 84 36 87 NA 58 54
# Non-U.S. Proposals 3 0 15 6 22 NA 8 12
Nts Requested Staff 0 12.5 12 11.1 22 NA 39.5 39
Nts Requested Non-Staff 46.5 98.3 362.2 114 388.3 NA 410 536.1
Nts Requested U.S. 40 110.8 317.2 110.6 332.5 NA 409.5 481.8
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 6.5 0 57 14.4 77.8 NA 40 93.3
Nts Available 22 18 128 58 129 NA 370 357
Total Req/Avail 2.46 6.33 2.74 2.09 3.39 NA 1.16 1.52
Semester 2001A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 1 7 4 1 5 NA 5 12
# Non-Staff Proposals 9 70 96 35 72 NA 50 49
# U.S. Proposals 9 75 88 31 61 NA 45 52
# Non-U.S. Proposals 1 2 12 5 16 NA 10 9
Nts Requested Staff 3 9.8 12 2 15 NA 20 42
Nts Requested Non-Staff 9.8 113.6 328.3 101 264 NA 276.2 426.5
Nts Requested U.S. 12.7 121.4 303.1 82.8 226 NA 252.2 393.5
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 0.5 2 37.3 20.3 53 NA 44 75
Nts Available 5 34 145 60 140 NA 160 413
Total Req/Avail 1.95 3.59 2.31 1.55 2.16 NA 1.66 0.97
Semester 2001B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 1 3 5 2 5 NA 5 10
# Non-Staff Proposals 10 74 76 39 96 NA 43 47
# U.S. Proposals 10 73 75 35 87 NA 40 43
# Non-U.S. Proposals 1 4 6 6 14 NA 8 14
12 SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
Semester 2001B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
Nts Requested Staff 5 7.6 17 5 26 NA 36 54.5
Nts Requested Non-Staff 21 119 300.6 103.7 374.7 NA 272.2 359.1
Nts Requested U.S. 23 122.3 297.6 93.5 354.7 NA 261.2 307.6
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 3 4.3 20 15.2 46 NA 47 106
Nts Available 10.5 55.9 124 60 161 NA 143 316
Total Req/Avail 2.5 2.3 2.56 1.86 2.96 NA 2.34 1.26
Semester 2002A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 1 14 5 1 8 NA 6 6
# Non-Staff Proposals 11 99 74 31 63 NA 43 38
# U.S. Proposals 10 107 69 24 53 NA 42 35
# Non-U.S. Proposals 2 6 10 8 13 NA 7 9
Nts Requested Staff 0.5 23.6 19 3 25 NA 53 31.5
Nts Requested Non-Staff 23.6 200 254.8 84.1 217.2 NA 229.2 271.7
Nts Requested U.S. 19.6 211.6 247.8 64.6 193.2 NA 256.2 242.6
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 4.5 12 26 22.5 49 NA 26 60.6
Nts Available 15 38.9 161 48.5 147 NA 175.5 314.7
Total Req/Avail 1.54 5.75 1.66 1.67 1.7 NA 1.28 0.9
Semester 2002B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 0 10 3 4 13 NA 6 12
# Non-Staff Proposals 23 93 75 29 82 NA 37 40
# U.S. Proposals 21 97 66 30 78 NA 36 41
# Non-U.S. Proposals 2 6 12 3 17 NA 7 11
Nts Requested Staff 0 23 13 23 67.5 NA 25.5 49.8
Nts Requested Non-Staff 47 158.5 332.3 100.5 361.7 NA 245.7 272.6
Nts Requested U.S. 43 170 304.3 112.5 373.2 NA 235.2 260.6
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 4 11.5 41 11 56 NA 36 61.9
Nts Available 19.5 52.84 90 61.5 95.5 NA 133 274.45
Total Req/Avail 2.26 3.43 2.81 1.9 3.28 NA 1.49 0.95
Semester 2003A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 6 14 2 4 8 NA 6 2
# Non-Staff Proposals 38 118 92 35 78 NA 39 32
# U.S. Proposals 40 127 81 34 76 NA 39 28
# Non-U.S. Proposals 4 5 13 5 10 NA 6 6
Nts Requested Staff 10.6 32.5 8 10.5 17.3 NA 40 3
Nts Requested Non-Staff 58.7 203.7 370.8 110.3 318.7 NA 205.2 230.5
Nts Requested U.S. 61.3 230.4 338.8 99.8 313 NA 201.2 170
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 8 5.8 40 21 23 NA 44 63.5
Nts Available 69.3 73.84 111.5 55.75 111.5 NA 136 159.8
Total Req/Avail 2.54 3.14 2.76 2.01 2.76 NA 1.5 1.21
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 13
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
Semester 2003B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 0 12 1 4 6 NA 3 3
# Non-Staff Proposals 43 95 72 38 86 NA 29 30
# U.S. Proposals 39 99 64 38 77 NA 27 28
# Non-U.S. Proposals 4 8 9 4 15 NA 5 5
Nts Requested Staff 0 24.3 3 23 30.3 NA 13 15.8
Nts Requested Non-Staff 80.3 190.4 287.1 122.5 368.2 NA 209.2 226.2
Nts Requested U.S. 74.3 203.2 256.1 132.5 338.5 NA 188.2 197.5
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 6 11.5 34 13 60 NA 34 44.5
Nts Available 28.25 78.71 91.5 42.25 103 NA 136 139.31
Total Req/Avail 2.73 2.73 2.63 3.17 2.6 NA 1.5 1.37
Semester 2004A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 1 19 9 4 7 NA 8 4
# Non-Staff Proposals 39 114 72 41 82 NA 37 37
# U.S. Proposals 37 124 73 39 71 NA 40 35
# Non-U.S. Proposals 3 9 8 6 18 NA 5 6
Nts Requested Staff 2 46.2 21.5 14.5 23.3 NA 42 16.6
Nts Requested Non-Staff 66 254.8 269.3 143.8 323 NA 213.2 226.9
Nts Requested U.S. 62 277.7 270.3 138.3 280.3 NA 237.2 197.4
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 6 23.4 20.5 20 66 NA 18 46.1
Nts Available 68 128.18 109 49.25 121.55 NA 135 151
Total Req/Avail 3.6 2.35 2.09 2.93 2.49 NA 1.44 1.51
Semester 2004B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 3 16 14 6 10 NA 6 4
# Non-Staff Proposals 47 144 53 29 69 NA 32 34
# U.S. Proposals 46 150 64 31 67 NA 37 31
# Non-U.S. Proposals 3 10 3 4 12 NA 1 7
Nts Requested Staff 8 44.8 35.2 25 42 NA 14.4 28
Nts Requested Non-Staff 98 321.1 210.8 86 262.7 NA 210.2 208.8
Nts Requested U.S. 100 344.6 240 99 273.7 NA 216.6 200
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 5 21.2 6 12 31 NA 8 26.9
Nts Available 35 101.02 10.4 38 112.5 NA 123 144.13
Total Req/Avail 2.91 3.62 1.72 2.63 1.91 NA 1.4 1.54
Semester 2005A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 2 20 8 4 2 2 6 4
# Non-Staff Proposals 53 197 71 28 66 8 33 30
# U.S. Proposals 51 174 66 27 55 10 37 30
# Non-U.S. Proposals 4 43 13 5 13 0 2 4
Nts Requested Staff 5 56.9 19 14 8 1.9 38 27.3
14 SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT
1 PROPOSAL REQUESTS AND SUBSCRIPTION RATES
SENIOR REVIEW METRICS SUPPLEMENT 15
Semester 2005A 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
Nts Requested Non-Staff 110.6 411.5 278.8 79.2 257.7 25.3 208.7 260
Nts Requested U.S. 106.6 413.8 248.3 75.2 207.7 27.1 239.7 257.9
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 9 54.6 49.5 18 58 0 7 29.4
Nts Available 2.61 100.99 121.5 54.5 144.5 27.15 113 187.45
Total Req/Avail 4.43 4.64 2.07 1.58 1.58 1 1.83 1.47
Semester 2005B 1TSIP 2Gemini 3Mayall 4WIYN 5Blanco 6SOAR 7KP Small 8CT Small
# Staff Proposals 3 18 10 14 8 4 5 7
# Non-Staff Proposals 22 150 63 33 70 5 35 32
# U.S. Proposals 24 132 64 42 65 9 35 33
# Non-U.S. Proposals 1 36 9 5 13 0 5 6
Nts Requested Staff 3.5 41.7 49 74 47 11.5 14 49.9
Nts Requested Non-Staff 54.6 298.7 351.5 98.4 364.5 13 253.2 226.2
Nts Requested U.S. 55.1 293.5 365.5 156.4 368.5 24.5 233.2 245.1
Nts Requested Non-U.S. 3 46.9 35 16 43 0 34 31
Nts Available 25.15 93.135 70.5 46 89.5 14 150 151.47
Total Req/Avail 2.19 3.65 3.21 2.66 2.88 1.75 1.37 1.67
