Upload
others
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1. Gaius Julius CAESAR, despite the civil war between 49 and 45 BC and his
frequent absences fighting outside Italy, had been able to introduce a whole
series of economic and administrative reforms, often holding the powers of the
office of dictator to get his legislation passed.
2. For a multiplicity of reasons CAESAR had been assassinated on 15th March
44 BC by “Republicans” whose slogan was “FREEDOM!” - but not before
he had introduced an innovation by putting his own head on the coinage of the
state - the first instance of a living Roman appearing on coins.
3. This practice has implications for our course, since it became the ‘norm’ for the
portrait of the head of state to appear on the state’s coinage for at least the next
five hundred years.
OCTAVIAN AND HIS WORK AS AUGUSTUS
Coin minted by Lucius Aemilius Buca
depicting CAESAR as IM(perator) [military
commander]
Two coins minted after late
January 44 BC depicting
CAESAR
as “life-long ‘dictator’”
[DIC(TATOR) PERPETUUS]
CAESAR had set the precedent and soon after his assassination the head of BRUTUS appeared
on the coinage, along with ‘a cap of freedom’, ‘two daggers’ and the wording EID MAR
THE RISE OF OCTAVIAN AND HIS WORK AS “AUGUSTUS”
1. In his will the assassinated JULIUS CAESAR had named his great-nephew,
GAIUS OCTAVIUS as his heir (to his estate, his clients, and his veteran
soldiers) and had announced his adoption of GAIUS OCTAVIUS as his son.
2. It hung in the balance whether GAIUS OCTAVIUS would take up his
inheritance at all: his mother advised against.
3. Caesar’s right-hand man and close associate, MARCUS ANTONIUS, appears
to have expected more from Julius Caesar.
4. The future was going to depend very much on how GAIUS OCTAVIUS (at
18) approached his inheritance, especially given this dissatisfaction over the
terms of Caesar’s will on the part of MARCUS ANTONIUS (aged 39).
5. Although there was a short period of conflict between GAIUS OCTAVIUS
(who initially was wooed by the SENATE to support its cause) and MARCUS
ANTONIUS, he was soon working, at least for a time, with MARCUS
ANTONIUS and a third ‘Caesarian’, Marcus Aemilius LEPIDUS as
a member of the formal “SECOND TRIUMVIRATE” which was
legitimized through legislation and which, in essence, meant that the
Roman state was now ‘managed’ for two five-year terms by a JUNTA OF
THREE.
6. But, after the disgrace of LEPIDUS, OCTAVIAN and MARCUS ANTONIUS
soon ceased seeing eye to eye, drifted apart, and began to prepare for what was
perhaps the inevitable conflict between the two “Caesarians”.
7. a) OCTAVIAN more and more worked on gaining the support of “the West”;
b) MARK ANTONY had the support of “the East” and soon gained access to
the massive resources of Egypt too - through its queen, CLEOPATRA VII.
Two contemporary
depictions of
CLEOPATRA VII
8. The final confrontation (after years of propaganda) between the two camps came
only at the naval battle of ACTIUM at the beginning of September 31 BC.
9. a) A victorious OCTAVIAN was soon left the sole surviving military leader
from what had been another civil war, although it was presented as a foreign
war against an ambitious foreign queen, namely CLEOPATRA, .who had
“entrapped” a MARCUS ANTONIUS who was bewitched by Egyptian culture
and Egypt’s queen.
b) After Actium and some necessary ‘mopping up’ operations, all power,
through the support of the armed forces, was, by 30 BC, in the hands of
GAIUS JULIUS CAESAR OCTAVIANUS.
10. As the dominant figure politically, OCTAVIAN ‘ruled’ for the next three years
with an iron fist.
11. BUT by 28 BC he appears to have become more and more aware that his fate
might be the same as that of his great-uncle and adoptive father, JULIUS
CAESAR, if he remained a blatant ‘autocrat’.
12. And so he began the complex process of “inventing” the ‘PRINCIPATE’ or
‘EMPIRE’ as a new form of government to replace “the REPUBLIC”.
13. And, in January 27 BC he himself became
“IMPERATOR CAESAR AUGUSTUS”
and began moulding more and more the new position of “PRINCEPS”
(“FIRST CITIZEN”) and, with time, founding a dynasty, the ‘JULIO-
CLAUDIAN’ dynasty.
14. From that time onwards AUGUSTUS work tirelessly for over 40 years to
stabilize the state, to reform the administration, and to strengthen the
foundations of society as he created the new system, “the Empire”.
15. And as he created the new system which was in reality a disguised ‘autocracy’
headed by a “First Citizen”, he never acknowledged that an autocratic political
system had been created, always aiming to create the impression that “the
Republic” had been restored and that he was just a citizen like the rest, even if
the leading one - the “first among equals” [primus inter pares].
16. a) On becoming ‘Augustus’ in January 27 BC, he accepted a huge provincial
‘governorship’ for ten years (which was always renewed) consisting of “the
two Spains”, “the three Gauls”, “Syria”, “Cilicia” [in southern Turkey] and (for a
time) “Macedonia” [+ Egypt] - leading to the terminology “the imperial
provinces”.
b) the remaining provinces were now called “senatorial” (or “public”) and to each
of them the SENATE continued to send a governor each year as before.
[Any new “provinces” added by conquest became “imperial”]
MACEDONIA
GREEN =
‘IMPERIAL’
PINK =
‘PUBLIC’
THE WORK OF AUGUSTUS
ARMED FORCES
1. a) Once stability returned, Augustus spent ten years creating the Roman state’s
first permanent professional army, consisting initially of 28 legions (with
about 150,000 well-paid men) strategically stationed towards the frontiers of
the empire.
b) To the legions were attached auxiliary units offering a career to about
150,000 provincial subjects - together giving a professional army of 300,000.
2. The army’s loyalty to Augustus was guaranteed, since he paid for it himself from
his own resources - handing over to the state, in AD 6 (by creating a “military
treasury”) responsibility for at least the troops’ pensions when they retired.
CIVIL SERVICE
1. He also began to mould the state’s first ever civil service, offering in particular
paid positions to members of “the Equestrian Order” – the most important
appointees (answerable to Augustus alone) being the two PREFECTS OF THE
PRAETORIAN GUARD, who commanded (in the end) a force of some 9000
men in Italy.
2. A very limited number of hand-picked senators served too: as the governors of
the provinces assigned to Augustus in January 27 BC and as the commanders of
the professional legions.
CULTURE
1. The city of Rome was enhanced with an extensive building programme and
literary production was stimulated through patronage, although there is little
evidence of any pressure being brought to bear on the writers (men like Virgil,
Horace, Propertius and Livy) who were sponsored to write on any particular
themes.
2. “The Augustan Age” also saw the production of a superb coinage with a
very impressive range of themes, many of them purely artistic and not
conveying any particular political message that we are aware of, although some
did celebrate the achievements of the new political order
AUGUSTUS
IN A TRIUMPHAL
CHARIOT
RECORDING THE
FOUNDATION OF
NEMAUSUS(modern NÎMES in France)
WHERE VETERANS
FROM EGYPT WERE
SETTLED
(hence the crocodile)
TWO COINS WHICH SEEM TO BE PURELY ARTISITIC
THE STRENGTHENING OF SOCIETY
1. An attempt was made through legislation (not very successfully) to strengthen
the family as a unit, to encourage the procreation of children, to limit frivolous
divorces, to criminalize adultery, and to regulate the flow into society of freed
slaves (who became Roman citizens upon ‘manumission’).
2. a) The religion of the state was given new life through the repair of temples and
the restoration of neglected rituals.
b) Outside Italy non-citizens were not discouraged from dedicating temples,
shrines and altars to Augustus, on condition that ROMA was associated with his
name - giving rise to “the imperial cult” (erroneously called ‘emperor worship’) and to
surviving dedications to “ROMA ET AUGUSTUS”.
TERRITORIAL EXPANSION
1. The empire grew under Augustus too (especially as it was extended north-
eastwards to the line of the River Danube), but attempts to establish a Roman
presence east of the River Rhine were abandoned after the disaster of
Quinctilius Varus in AD 9 (when three entire legions [of Rome’s 28] were wiped
out of existence).
2. Augustus, in his will five years later, recommended that there be no further
expansion of the empire.
THE EMPIRE ABOUT 32 BC AS OCTAVIAN
WAS ABOUT TO DEFEAT MARK ANTONY
AND CLEOPATRA
THE EMPIRE IN AD 9 (FIVE
YEARS BEFORE AUGUSTUS’
DEATH) AND JUST BEFORE
THE WESTWARD WITHDRAWAL
BACK TO THE LINE OF THE
RIVER RHINE
CONSTITUTIONAL REORGANIZATION
1. As noted earlier, OCTAVIAN ruled initially with an iron fist for three years.
2. But in 28 BC, he announced that any of his acts of questionable
constitutionality would become null-and-void at the end of the year.
3. Then in January 27 BC, as one of the two consuls, he presided over the
SENATE and announced that he was surrendering control of the empire to
“the Roman Senate and People” (S.P.Q.R.)
4. But then the most unstable “provinces” were almost immediately returned to
his control for a ten-year term and various honours were bestowed upon him,
including the new name “AUGUSTUS”.
5. However, dissatisfaction caused by his continuing monopolization of one of the
two annual consulships after that led to a readjustment of his position in
23 BC.
6. He resigned the consulship, accepted the powers of a “tribune of the Plebs”
for life (without the office of tribune) and had his formal authority over the
“imperial” provinces made superior to that of other provincial governors
(enabling him, if need be, to issue orders legally to the governors of the
‘public’ provinces which the Senate still oversaw).
7. Later, probably in 19 BC, he accepted the powers of the consulship for life
but, again, without holding the actual office of consul.
7. a) It had taken time, but Augustus had gradually accumulated into his own
hands a series of traditional, “Republican” powers (without the offices) and
had created the new position of Princeps (“First citizen”).
b) The importance of this work lies in the fact that all his successors had
approximately the same ‘constitutional’ position for the next 200 years.
8. But the ‘problem’ for Augustus was how to pass these extensive powers,
entrusted to him for use in the interests of the state during his lifetime only, to
the next generation – without destroying the image that “the Republic” had
been “restored”.
“THE SUCCESSION”
1. From early on Augustus appears to have wanted a family member to follow
him as ‘head of state’, but the position was not hereditary and he needed to
maintain the pretence that Rome was a “Republic” (as just noted).
2. a) Having no son, he ‘used’ his daughter JULIA in the most unconscionable
manner through her various arranged marriages in order to obtain an heir.
b) Upon the birth in 17 BC (during her second marriage) of her second son,
LUCIUS, (which gave Augustus a second grandson) he adopted both LUCIUS
and his older brother, GAIUS (born in 20 BC), as his ‘sons’ and, once they
had reached ‘manhood’, began to have powers bestowed on them in
preparation (presumably) for one or other of them to assume the helm of
the state after his death.
3. But in AD 2 LUCIUS died (aged 18) and two years later in AD 4 GAIUS died too
(aged 23).
3. Reluctantly (we are told) AUGUSTUS (at the age of 66) now adopted, as his
‘son’ and heir, his stepson and former son-in-law TIBERIUS (aged 45) who over
the next nine years was gradually given the same formal powers that Augustus
enjoyed.
5. Consequently, when AUGUSTUS died in AD 14 (at 76), TIBERIUS could move
smoothly to become Rome’s second “PRINCEPS” with very few formalities
required.