Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
POST OFFICE BOX 12291 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
k NORTH CAROLINA 27709-2291
919-781-3550
Rfl 9 I990
STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT
REFERENCE NO. 6780
BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY
ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS AND
PLUME OPACITY TESTING
DRYER STACK
JUNE 11, 1990
REPORT CERTIFICATION
DATE June 2 5 , 1990
The project was carried out under my direction and supervieion.
Signature ~ILl-wk
Christopher M. Wrenn
he analysie performed for this report wae cartied out under my direction
and eupervieion.
Signature
The preparation of this report was carried out under my direction and
eupervision.
Signature
I hereby certify that this report is authentic and accurate.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE . LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . a . iii
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Out l ineo f Teat Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.2 T e s t Par t i c ipan ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
SUMMAFtY OF RESULTS
1.1 Presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
1.2 PlumeOpacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.2 SourceAirF low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.3 Operation During Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
4.2 Sampling Pointe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.3 Volumetr icAirFlowRates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.3.1' FlueGae Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.3.2 FlueGas Compoeition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.3.3 FlueGae MoistureContent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.4 Par t icu la te Emieeions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.5 PlumeOpacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.6 Equipment Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
General 5-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 Preventive Maintenance and Equipment Calibration . . . . . . . 5-1 Sample Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Instrument Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 Blanke and Spikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 fnternal/External System Audit Checka . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 Data Reduction and Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 Q A / Q C S U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
( continued next page)
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE - APPENDICES
A. Test Reeults
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Particulate 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Plumeopacity 4
3. ExampleCalculatione. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 B. Field and Analytical Data
1. Particulate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2. PlumeOpacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
C. Calibration Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
D . Sampling and Analytical Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
iii
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
T a b l e F i g u r e T i t l e .....
P a g e .... T e e t Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
T e e t P a r t i c i p a n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
P a r t i c u l a t e T e e t Sun)mary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
D r y e r A i r Flow S c h e m a t i c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
D r y e r T e s t L o c a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
P r o j e c t O r g a n i z a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
In-House Equipment C a l i b r a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
In-Houee I n s t r u m e n t C a l i b r a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Outline of Teet Program. Stationary source sampling was performed for
the Barnhill Contracting Company in Rocky Mount, North Carolina on June 11, 1990.
Three sets of EPA Method 5 and EPA Method 9 runs were performed at the dryer
stack to determine the particulate emiesions and plume opacity, teepectively.
Table 1-1 is a test log which presents the test parameters, sampling methods, and
tun numbere for the test program.
TABLE 1-1
DRYER STACK TEST LOG
Run Numbers Teat Sampling - - - - - - Repetition - I - - - - Parameter Method 1 2 3
C02 r O2 EPA 3 M3-1 - - - - Particulate EPA 5 M5-1 M5-2 M-3
Plume Opacity EPA 9 M9-1 M9-2 M9-3
1.2 Teet Participants. Table 1-2 lists the pereonnel involved in the test
program.
TABLE 1-2
TEST PARTICIPANTS
Barnhill Contracting Company
Entropy Environmentaliete Inc.
Mr. Lee Cooper Test Coordinator
Christopher M. Wrenn Project Manager
Stuart R. Davia Project Supervisor
Charles G. McRae Engineering Technician
SuMXAElY OF RESULTS
2.1 Presentat ion. Table 2-1 p resen t s a run-by-run sununary of t h e
p a r t i c u l a t e emissions t e s t i n g performed on June 11, 1990 a t t h e d rye r stack.
Deta i led test r e s u l t s are presented i n Appendix A.1; f i e l d and a n a l y t i c a l da ta
a r e given i n Appendix 8.1.
2.2 plume Opacity. For runs M9-1 and M9-3, t h e highest%-minute average
opaci ty readings w e r e 2%,and I%, respect ive ly . For rune M9-1, M9-2, and M9-3,
t h e h ighes t s i n g l e opac i ty readings w e r e 109, 5 8 , and 109, respect ive ly .
Detai led t e a t r e e u l t s a r e presented i n Appendix A.2; f i e l d d a t a is given i n
Appendix B .2.
TABLE 2-1
PARTICULATE TESTS SUMMARY
Dryer Stack
Run Date
Run S ta r t Time
Run Fin ish Time
Test Tra in Parameters:
Volune Of Dry Gas Sample, SCF
Percent l sok ine t i c
Flue Gas Parameters:
CO2, Percent By Volume, Dry
02, Percent By V o l w , Dry
Temperature, 'F
A i r Flou Rate, Dry SCFM *
A i r FLou Rate, Uet ACFM
Excess A i r . Percent
F i l t e r a b l e Par t icu late:
Concentration, grains/DSCF
Emission Rate, l b /h r
Average - - - - - - -
68" F (20' C) - - 29.92 Inches o f Mercury (Hg).
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
3.1 General. The Barnhil l Contracting Company operates an o i l - f i red
aephalt dryer a t t h e i r f a c i l i t y i n Rocky Mount, North Carolina.
3.2 Source A i r Flow. Figure 3-1 is an a i r flow schematic which shows t h e
paesage of f l u e gaeee exhausted from t h e dryer.
3.3 Operation During Teeting. The dryer i e ra ted a t 360 tone per hour but
was producing 310 tone per hour during t h i s t e a t program.
FIGURE 3-1. DRYER AIR FLOW SCHEMATIC.
ATMOSPHERE
A
STACK TEST / L0CATK)N
4
1.0. FAN
f
4
BAGHOUSE
4
DRYER
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
4.1 General. A l l sampling and ana ly t ica l procedures w e r e those recommended
by t h e United S t a t e s Environmental Protection Agency and t h e S t a t e A i r Pollution
Control Board, Commonwealth of Virginia. This sect ion provides br ief
descriptions of t he sampling and ana ly t ica l procedures. Detailed descriptions of
t he procedures a r e provided i n Appendix D.
4.2 Sampling Points. The number and location of t h e sampling points were
detemined according t o EPA Method 1. The s tack cross sect ion was divided in to
30 equal areas with f i v e sampling points on each of s i x t raverse axes, a s shown
i n Figure 4-1.
4.3 Volumetric A i r Flow Rates
4.3.1 Flue Gas Velocity. EPA Method 2 was used t o t ake t h e veloci ty
measurements during t h e t raverses of t h e s tack cross section.
4.3.2 Flue Gas Composition. During each run, a multipoint, integrated f lue
gas sample was col lected and analyzed according t o t h e procedures outl ined i n EPA
Method 3. The ana ly t ica l r eeu l t s w e r e used t o determine t h e f l u e gas
composition, molecular weight, and excess a i r .
4.3.3 Flue Gas Moisture Content, Moisture content was determinod by
analyzing t h e sampling t r a i n impinger reagents according t o t h e procedures
out l ined i n EPA Method 5.
4.4 Par t icu la te Emissions. EPA Method 5 sampling and ana ly t i ca l procedures
were used t o determine t h e pa r t i cu l a t e emissions. Each of t h e 30 ]jroints was
sampled f o r two minutes, resu l t ing i n net run times of 60 minutes.
4.5 Plume Opacity. The procedures outl ined i n EPA Method 9 w e r e followed
i n determining t h e plume opacity.
4.5 Equipment Calibration. Per t inent ca l ib ra t ion da ta a r e provided i n
Appendix C.
m FROM LD. FAA
6 AXES 5 POINTSIAXIS
30 TOTAL POINTS
DAMPERS
FIGURE 4-1. DRYER STACK TEST LOCATION.
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
5.1 General. Entropy Environmentalists Inc. (EEI) is committed to the
continued implementation of a Quality Assurance Program to assure the quality of
sampling and analytical procedures of environmental measurement data. The
Quality Assurance measures taken during this test project equals or exceeds the
minimum QA/QC recommendations as set forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) for a particular method.
The following eectione outline the QA program implemented by EEI to justify
the validity of test procedures. As applicable, the QA system for the various
test programs addteesee the following areas:
r Project Organization
n Preventive Maintenance & Equipment Calibration
n QA Sample Proceaming
w Analytical Inmttument Calibration
u Blanks and Spiked Samples
* Internal/External System Checks
w Data Reduction & Validation
n Continuous Emieoione Monitoring
n QA/QC Summary
5.2 Project Organization. The organization of the project team, including
QA functione, are shown in Figure 5-1. Note that the QA etructure is independent
of the organizational group. which generate measurement data during the teat
program.
5.3 Preventive Maintenance and Equipment Calibration. An effective
preventive maintenance program decrease. downtime and thus increase8 data
completeneae and quality. Pretemt and poetteat equipment calibrationm are
conducted in a manner and at a frequoncy which meet8 or exceed8 U.S. EPA
epecificatione.
Each item tranmported to the field is inspected to detect equipment problems
which may originate during periods of storage. All equipment returning from the
field are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned, and recalibrated as necemeary.
Routine maintenance on equipment (dry gas meters, pumps, magnehelics/manometers,
pitot tubes, and nozzles) is carried out periodically for leako, corrosion,
dents, or any other damage. Table 5-1 shows the activities for equipant
calibration.
-t L i n e s of Authority
Quality Assurance L i n e s - of Authority
JAMES PEELER PROJECT DIRECTOR
TONY m N G
CHRIS WRENN EMIL STEWART PROJECT MANAGER
I I I GEORGE WALSH JOHN NASX FRANK PHOENIX, P.E.
RESEARCH & ANALYSIS REPORT FIELD OPERATIONS QA OFFICER QA OFFICER QA OFFICER
I M.E. JACKSON WET LABORATORY TASK MANAGER
DAPHNE HOLDEN REPORT
TASK MANAGER
CElRIS WRENN FIELD OPERATIONS TASK MANAGER
TABLE 5-1
IN-HOUSE EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
cal ibrat ion mthod And t rauoncv
C o a c t i v a srmcificationm Action
vimual inmpoction prior to mhipwat to twt m i t o .ad again pr ior to u c h day of t u t i n g .
Luk clmckod boforo and a f t o r mch f io ld u r .
0-10" wa-r colum
Within t 58
I n i t i a l l y a l i b r a t d w u f u l l rang..
Rapair and RmCa1ibrato.
Aftor wch f io ld u r , chwkad .g.imt i n c l i n d mnortu a t avorag. mottinp8 oncountuod during t u t i n g .
Adjumt, dotormino corrootlon factor, o r ro ja t .
Aftor pureh... .Id pr ior t o u o b f io ld u r , using rn --in-gius -Ur.
Adfumt, d o t o w c o r r c t i o n factor, or r o j c t .
m.rppcoupio/ P o t o n t i o r t o r
Aftor pu tchar . 3-point ( l a bath, boiling w a t u , .rrd hot o i l ) uming ALlTn mmuy-ln-gla8m -. aoforr .ad a f f u u c h f i e l d u u , c- to ~ l ~ l mrcuy- in-glaam tho- a t ubivlt coIIditi0IU.
D r y o.. -tor m d Orif ico
Pul l cal ibrat ion (wuy 6 math.) o v u wid. rango of o r i f i c o mmttinpm to obt.in cal ibrat ion factor.
Wl( - t 0.02 - f r a . v q . ~ ~ C f . fo r wch run. - t 0.15" B20 w u dolt . E rmgo of 0.4. to 4.0".
Adjumt o r r r p l r r
LO-minuto quick cal ibrat ion b . f M mading to t..t sit. and again pr ior to u c h d.y of f io ld u r .
t 38 of fu l l . r 5% of fu l l .
u.0 i r no backup. not u r .
Pomttomt ( a t avorago dol t . B and hiqhwt vacuum) to dotormino i f m t u qamm ha8 chmgod.
t 58 of f u l l c a l i - bration. pactor ( i n i t i a l o r rocali- bration) th.t y ie ld . tho l a r r m t 8aDpl. V O ~ W tor tho tooting i m umod.
mtor calibration, rtmr corff lc iont
t 2% of 8vuag. factar fo r u c h cal ibrat ion run.
D r y Cam Motor Annul calibratioam Tranm f u conducted i n t r i p l i c a t . Standard using EPA mt tut
rtu. calibratiolu conduetad a t 7 flow r a w 8 f r a 0.25 to 1.40 cfm.
Adjumt and r c a l i - brat..
Probr Nozzle
R.p.ir and raCa1ibr.t..
Avuag. of 5 I.D. ruurmt . u.ing a mimtu. ~ 1 . ~ 1 i n 8 p c t i a a boforo .ad af-r each f i e l d u r .
5.4 Sample Processing. Entropy employe systems which ensure the integrity
of an environmental sample from the time of acquieition, through analysie, and
ultimately to proper disposal. These systems are necessary to allow valid
conclusions to be drawn from analytical results separated in time and space from
the sampling operation. In addition, these eyeterns recognize that samples are
occasionally of value even after analytical results have been reported.
Samples are collected, transported, and stored in clean containera which are
constructed of materials inert to the analytical matrix. Containers are ueed
which allow air tight seals. When necessary, containers are employed which
prevent photochemical reactions. All eample containers are labeled with the
following information:
Unique source identifier
II Sample run identifier
Analyte identifier
* Sample matrix identifier
w Sample analyst identifier
Additional information relating to the ermgle is recorded on the data sheaf
for the sampling run that afforded the eubject mample. Accordingly, the mampling
data sheet contains all the information listed above, plus the date and time the
eample was acquired and supplemental information such as observations pmrtinent
to the quality of the eample. For condensed samples, e.g., samples in liquid
media, the eample level8 are markmd on the outmidm of the container; thia mark ie
used to indicate sample lomm, and am much, may serve am a rafmrmncm in rdjumting
reeults accordingly.
For transport from the field to the laboratory, samples are stored in locked
boxes and secured in a faehion which minimize8 movemont and thus prevontm
breakage of containers. Boxes used for transporting glass containers are packed
with foam.
Sample8 remain in thm cumtody of the ampler from acquimition until
conveyance to the laboratory analyet, if the analyst is different from thm
sampler. The sampler initiate8 a eample chain of custody rmcord at the t i w of
sample collection in the field. All cumtody tranmfers are documented on the
chain of custody form, which remain. with the sample at all them.
Analytical data are identified in a manner identical to that of the sampling
data. Accordingly, all data generated from the analyeis of eamples are
documented with the following information:
r Source identifier
r Sample run identifier
n Analyte identifier
r Sample matrfx identifier
r Analyrt identifier
Analyeis date
Portion. of smplee remaining after analysie are returned to their original
sample containers. Theee eamplee are etored in designated etorage aream until
their destruction is authorized.
5.5 Insttuwnt Calibration. ~~~~~nt calibration is one of the most
Fmportant functione in generating precise and accurate quality data. A listing
of major in-houee instrumentation and the corresponding Quality Assurance program
is given in Table 5-2.
All of the contract laboratoriem involved in the analytical tomting for the
teat program maintained rigorous QA programs for inetrument calibration.
5.6 Blanks and Spike.. Field blanks, amthod blanks, trip blanks, lab-proof
blanks and filter blankm are obtained, digested and analyzed whan applicable.
The blank. rmflect thm background contambation obtained from the various source.
during the sampling and analyeis. Thum, data adjustment or corrmction can be
made accordingly.
In moat cases, it is not necemmary to digest and analyze the method blanks,
reagent blanks or the lab-proof blanks unloms the field blank shows a high level
of contamination. If a high level of contamination is present, it is imperative
to individually analyze the above blank. to help determine the cauam of
contaminat ion.
Spiked smplmm arm usad to chock on the parformance of a rotatino analymim or
the rocovery efficimncy of a method. During spiking, a known amount of mtock 8olutions of the substance of interest is added to thm eample prior to mampla
extraction, digeation, and analyaie.
ENTROPY
TABLE 5-2
IN-HOUSE INSTRUMENT CAtIBRATION
Calibration htimd - Daily a d mnehly chc*. with a m u i r of c l ru e wight..
B A l u m m s0Wic.d amrully by a qur1ifi.d suvica rrprurataucn .nd chrkad with a mulam of WII wrighta.
3-point ~.libr.tlon CILNa a t th. .xpct.d rang..
Duplicata injaotion er t b -la until : 58 vuiation i n . c h i m v e d .
Calibration rmpmtd a t tha .od or w h u m t m u i r .
Calihrathna a t ch. b.ginmiq, a r t u th. slrst injatiosl, .rd a r t u tha waorrd tnjau011.
5- point caUbratioa prior to .aalyting th. suplam Cor tha sp r i c i c iom .
5.7 ~nternal/External System Audit Checks. System and performance audits
are routine elements of all Entropy QA/QC programs.
Internal Systems Audit: The following eampling equipment check8 were
conducted prior to sample collection.
m ~ l l sampling equipment was thoroughly checked to ensure clean and
operable componente.
n Equipment was inrpected for poeeible damage from ehipment.
w The oil manometere or Hagnehelic gauges were leveled and zmroed.
The temperature meaourement eyatem6 were checked for damagm and
operability by mgasuring the ambient temperature.
Performance Auditat Pmrformance audits of the laboratory are conducted
prior to thm procemming of any compliance eunplaa for anrlymim. Audit materials
typically includm mamplem available from the EPA prior to n w source tasting.
Aleo, samples of known concentration are epecially prepared in-houee or obtained
from the EPA for Internal QA checks.
External Sytemm Audits: Entropy is eubject to a ayetem audit each time a
test ie conducted for any Air Pollution Control agency. This procedure entails
an EPA observer on-oite to do qualitative evaluation of performance to
demonstrate compliance with the applicable regulations.
5.8 Data Raduction and Validation. Thm teat t a m leadmr is rmmponmible for
reviewing and validating data am they are acquired. Each team leader ham
extensive knowledge of sampling methodology and thm characteristics of the
procees being measured and ia capable of evaluating the accuracy,
repreeentativeneos, and completenese of raw data on-eite, where action to replace
inadequate data can be taken kamediately.
Data obtained during calibratfons and test runm arm rmcordod on standardizad
forme which are checked twice for completeneee and accuracy by the QA Director or
his designated repreeentative. Data reduction and conmietency are achieved by
using the standardized forme and ueing Entropy's in-houee computer facilities.
5.9 QA/QC Summary. A11 chemicale used were American Chemical Society
(ACS), High Purity Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), or peeticide grade. The
distilled, deionized water utilized met or exceeded the American Society for
Teeting and Materiala (ASTM) epecificatione for Type-I reagent water. Pretest
and poettest leak checks were conducted on each sampling train.
APPENDIX A . l
A. TEST RESULTS
1. Particulate
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT: Barnhi l l Contracting Conpany, Rocky Mount, N.C.
RUN # DATE SAMPLING LOCATION OPERATOR -.-----..--- .------- -- - - - . - * - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - . - ------------------------. M5-1 6/11/90 Dryer Stack Stuart R. Davis M5-2 6/ 1 1 /90 Dryer Stack Stuart R. Davis M5-3 6/11/90 Dryer Stack Stuart R. Davis
Run Star t Time Run Finish Time
Net Traversing Points 30 30 30
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes 60.00 60.00 60.00
Die Nozzle Diameter, Inches 0.244 0.244 0.244
CP P i to t Tube Coeff icient 0.840 0.840 0.840
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.9895 0.9895 0.9895
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg 29.90 29.90 29.90
Delta-H Avg. Pressure D i f fe rent ia l of Or i f i ce Meter, Inches H20
Vm V o l u n Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF 56.598 64.228 61 ,233
t m Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F 98 101 100
Vmstd Volume O f Metered Gas Sanple, Dry SCF* 53.301 60.246 57.498
Vlc Total Volune of Liquid Collected i n lmpingers 8 Si l i ca Gel, m l
Vnstd Volune of Water Vapor, SCF*
XHZO Moisture Content, Percent by Volunc
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.704 0.710 0.700
Carbon Dioxide, Percent By Volune, Dry 6.0 6.0 6.0
m 2 Oxygen, Percent By Volune, Dry 12.7 12.7 12.7
f o Fuel Factor
Md Gas Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/lb-Hole, Vet
p9 Flue Gas Sta t ic Pressure, Inches H20
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg 29.84 29.84 29.85
t s Flue Gas Tenperature, Degrees F 296 281 28 1
Delta-p Average Velocity Head, Inches H20 1.5100 2.1960 2.0130
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet/Second 87.85 103.72 99.50
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches 1,350 1,350 1,350
Osd Volumetric A i r Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Paw Volumetric A i r Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
X I Isokinet ic Sampling Rate, Percent 105.8 98.5 99.3
XEA Excess Air, Percent 145 145 145
68" F (20" C) - - 29.92 lnches of Mercury (Hg) (Continued next page)
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION (Continued)
PLANT: Barnhil l Contracting Compeny, Rocky Mount, N.C.
F i l te rab le Part iculate
m9 Catch Weight, Milligrams gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF lb/hr Emission Rate, lb/hr
68' F (20' C) - - 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg)
APPENDIX A. 2
A. TEST RESULTS
2. Plume Opacity
ENTROPY
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa Grosshandler
File Name: M5-1
Start Time: 1205 Stop Time: 1305 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - O R I G I N A L D A T A - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min
1 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 10 5 4 5 5 0 0 5 0 10 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 17 0 5 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0
Set>> 00 15 3 0 4 5 Min 3 1 0 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 34 0 10 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 5 3 6 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 10 4 2 0 0 5 0 43 5 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 45 0 5 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 5 5 1 0 5 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0
NOTE :
- -- pp - - - -
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:44:31
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa Groashandler
File Name: M5-1
Start Time: 1205 Stop Time: 1305 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - R O L L I N G A V E R A G E S - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min
1 - - - - 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 4 - - - 5 - - - - 6 - - - 2 7 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2 2 9 2 2 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 11 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0
Sea> 00 15 30 45 Min 3 1 0 0 1 1 32 1 1 1 1 33 1 1 1 1 34 1 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 3 6 1 1 1 1 37 1 1 1 1 3 8 1 1 1 1 39 1 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 1 41 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 43 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 45 1 1 1 1 46 1 1 1 1 4 7 1 1 1 1 4 8 1 1 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
==========e=P=DtP===I=====I=======I============~==~~%~====~=~=====s=~==s~===~==
BLOCK SIZE (?or Rolling Averages) = 24 READINGS
*The highest BLOCK in this ROLLING AVERAGE is at 6 Min and 45 Sec
*>> OPERATION WAS PERFORMED ON THE: original DATA. <<*
NOTE :
-
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:44:51
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa Grosshandler
File NaxTie: M5-1
Start Time: 1205 Stop Time: 1305 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - B L O C K A V E R A G E S - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 45 Min
1 - - - - Set>> 00 15 30 45
Min 3 1 - - - - 32 - - - - 33 - - - - 3 4 - - - - 3 5 - - - - 36 - - - 1 37 - - - - 3 8 - - - - 3 9 - - - - 40 - - - - 41 - - - - 4 2 - - - 1 4 3 - - - - 44 - - - - 45 - - - - 4 6 - - - - 4 7 - - - - 48 - - - 0
49 - - - - 5 0 - - - - 5 1 - - - - 52 - - - - 53 - - - - 54 - - - 0 55 - - - - 56 - - - - 57 - - - - 58 - - - - 5 9 - - - - 60 - - - 0
------------=------- ------------ -------PS=eD=P=t=========O==I=i==~P============s================== BLOCK SIZE = 24 READINGS
*>> OPERATION WAS PERFORMED ON THE: original DATA. C<*
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:45:07
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa M. Groeshandler
File Name: MS-2
Start Time: 1315 Stop Time: 1415 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - O R I G I N A L D A T A - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min
1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 8 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
10 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 5 0 2 7 5 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0
NOTE :
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:48:46
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa M. Grosshandler
File Name: MS-2
Start Time: 1315 Stop Time: 1415 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - R O L L I N G A V E R A G E S - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min
1 - - - - 2 - - - -
S e e > 00 15 3 0 4 5 Min 3 1 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0
=====P===P3t=O===3'5=r=====eP======*=P=========x===~===========================
BLOCK SIZE (for Rolling Averages) = 24 READINGS
*The highest BLOCK in this ROLLING AVERAGE is at 8 Min and 0 SeC
*>> OPERATION WAS PERFORMED ON THE: original DATA. <<*
NOTE :
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:49:17
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting CO., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa M. Grosehandler
File Name: M5-2
Start Time: 1315 Stop Time: 1415 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - B L O C K A V E R A G E S - ...............................................................................
Set>> Min
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 0 2 1 22 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 30
Sea> 00 15 3 0 45 Min 3 1 - - - - 3 2 - - - - 33 - - - - 34 - - - - 3 5 - - - - 3 6 - - - 0 37 - - - - 3 8 - - - - 39 - - - - 4 0 - - - - 41 - - - - 42 - - - 0
4 3 - - - - 44 - - - - 45 - - - - 46 - - - - 4 7 - - - - 48 - - - 0 4 9 - - - - 5 0 - - - - 5 1 - - - - 52 - - - - 5 3 - - - - 5 4 - - - 0 5 5 - - - - 5 6 - - - - 57 - - - - 58 - - - - 5 9 - - - - 6 0 - - - 0
...............................................................................
BLOCK SIZE = 24 READINGS
*>> OPERATION WAS PERFORMED ON THE: original DATA. <<*
NOTE :
-
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:49:32
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa M. Groaehandler
File Name: M5-3
Start Time: 1541 Stop Time: 1641 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - O R I G I N A L D A T A - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 6 5 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 17 0 5 0 0 . 18 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 5 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 5 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min 3 1 0 5 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 5 10 3 7 0 5 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 39 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 4 2 5 0 10 0 43 0 5 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 45 10 5 10 0 46 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 5 48 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 50 0 5 0 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 53 5 0 5 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 56 0 0 5 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 0 5 0 60 0 0 0 0
NOTE :
-
DATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:54:10
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa M. Grosshandler
File Name: M5-3
Start Time: 1541 Stop Time: 1641 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
- - - - - - - - - - -
- R O L L I N G A V E R A G E S - ............................................................................... Sea> 00 15 30 45
Min Sea> 00 15 30 4 5
Min 3 1 0 1 1 1 32 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 1 37 1 1 1 1 3 8 1 1 1 1 39 1 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 42 1 1 1 1 43 1 1 1 1 44 1 1 1 1 45 1 1 2 2 4 6 2 2 2 2 4 7 2 2 2 2 48 2 2 1 1 49 1 1 1 1 50 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 52 1 1 1 1 53 1 1 1 1 54 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 57 1 1 1 1 58 1 1 1 1 59 1 1 1 1 60 1 1 1 1
==t=PtlP==P=l=l=ltt=IIx=====L:=I====5=P==~==%=======~=l=========================
BLOCK SIZE (for Rolling Averages) = 24 READINGS
*The highest BLOCK in this ROLLING AVERAGE is at 47 Min and 45 Sec
*>> OPERATION WAS PERFORMED ON THE: original DATA. <<*
)ATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:54:29
Name of Source: Barnhill Contracting Co., Tarboro, NC Oil Fired Dryer
Observer: Lisa M. Groashandler
File Name: M5-3
Start Time: 1541 Stop Time: 1641 Date of Test: 06-11-1990
............................................................................... - B L O C K A V E R A G E S - ...............................................................................
Set>> 00 15 30 4 5 Min
1 - - - - 2 - - - - 3 - - - - 4 - - - - 5 - - - - 6 - - - 1 7 - - - - 8 - - - - 9 - - - -
10 - - - - 11 - - - - 12 - - - 0 13 - - - - 14 - - - - 15 - - - - 16 - - - - 17 - - - - 18 - - - 0 19 - - - - 20 - - - - 2 1 - - - - 22 - - - - 2 3 - - - - 2 4 - - - 0 2 5 - - - - 2 6 - - - - 2 7 - - - - 2 8 - - - - 29 - - - - 30 - - - 0
Set>> 00 15 3 0 4 5 Min
3 1 - - - - 3 2 - - - - 33 - - - - 34 - - - - 3 5 - - - - 3 6 - - - 1 3 7 - - - - 3 8 - - - - 3 9 - - - - 4 0 - - - - 4 1 - - - - 4 2 - - - 1 4 3 - - - - 44 - - - - 45 - - - - 46 - - - - 47 - - - - 4 8 - - - 1 4 9 - - - - 50 - - - 5 1 - - - - 5 2 - - - - 53 - - - - 5 4 - - - 1 55 - - - - 56 - - - - 5 7 - - - - 5 8 - - - - 5 9 - - - - 60 - - - 1
=LD==IaP=tt=i'====l===P=t===~=P===P=====~=====%=~===~=======~===~=====~=======~
BLOCK SIZE = 24 READINGS
*>> OPERATION WAS PERFORMED ON THE: original DATA. <<*
ATE PRINT: 06-18-1990 TIME PRINT: 15:54:42
APPENDIX A. 3
A. TEST RESULTS
3. Example Calculationm
EXAMPLE TEST CALCULATIONS RUN M5-1
Dryer Stack
VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
Pbar + (Delta H113.6) Vmstd = 17-64 * Y * Vm * .....................
(460 + tm)
29.90 + (2.800/13.6) Vmstd = 17.64 * 0.9895 * 56.598 * .................... = 53.301 DSCF
(460 + 98)
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
Vwstd = 0.04707 * Vlc Vwstd = 0.04707 * 475.0 =22.358 SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE, BY VOLUME, AS MEASURED IN FLUE GAS
$H20 = 100 * Vwstd / (Vwstd + Vmstd)
ABSOLUTE FLUE GAS PKESSURE
Ps = Pbar + (Pg / 13.6)
Ps = 29.90 + (-0.75113.6) = 29.84 inches Hg
DRY MOLE FRACTION OF FLUE GAS
Mfd 1 - %H20 / 100 Mfd = 1 - 29.6/100 = 0.704
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF FLUE GAS
WET MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF FLUE GAS
Ms = (Md * Mfd) + (0.18 * %H20)
Ms = (29.47 * 0.704) + (0.18 * 29.6) = 26.07 lb/lb-Mole
AVERAGE FLUE GAS VELOCITY [Note: (Delta p)avg is square of average square root]
i (Delta P)avg * (460 + ts) vs = 85.49 * Cp * SQUARE ROOT .........................
PS * MS
DRY VOLUMETRIC FLUE GAS FLOW RATE AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
6 0 Tstd Ps Qsd = ----- * Mfd * vs * A * -------- * ------
144 460 + ts Pstd
Qsd = 24,232 DSCFM
WET VOLUMETRIC FLUE GAS FLOW RATE AT ACTUAL CONDITIONS
Qaw = 60 / 144 * vs * A
Qaw = 60 / 144 * 87.85 * 1,350.0 = 49,416 ACFM
PERCENT ISOKINETIC OF SAMPLING RATE
Pstd 100 (ts + 460) * Vmstd %I 3 ---- * --- * ................................................
Tstd 60 Ps * vs * Mfd * Theta * ( n * (~ozzle~ia/2)*/144)
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
CONCENTRATION, GRAINS PER DRY STANDARD CUBIC FOOT, FILTERABLE PARTICULATE
7,000 (mg / l o 3 ) gr/DSCF = ------- * ----------
453.592 Vmstd
EMISSION RATE, POUNDS PER HOUR, FILTERABLE PARTICULATE
60 (mg / l o J ) l b / h r = ------- * ---------- * Qsd
453.592 Vmstd
APPENDIX 8.1
B. FIELD AND ANALYTICAL DATA
1. Particulate
Preliminary Field Data
PUNT NAME /LJ~thl C - O N B R A ~ ~ I V LOCATION R O C H / v l o c ~ ~ ~ /J-c .
0 r SAMPLING LOCATION d - 5 T h W
NO. OF PORTS 6 PORT INSIDE DIAMETER 3''
DUCT DEPTH 1 1
mumor FM WALL TO OWE OF ~ R T 3 NIPPLE LENGTH 2 "
DEPTH OF DUCT 3op , l K l A N O U r . Ducn 4 5" I
EQUUAAEHT O L u m m
OISTANCE FROM - PORTS TO NEAREST FLOW DISTURBANCE 7zv' - 2 2
Z -- - . 61 - STACK AREA =L JW 3 n g4 5 , 1 SO ( ~ 2
ORSAT FIELD DATA 20
Plant Name & d 4 L (,A s T .
Sampling Locatior, &p&c& 5 7 ~ ~ 4 i u e l Type
Run and/or Sample No. Leak Test? Date Operator
Run .nd/or Sample So. 5 - m s - A Leak Test? w Date bcfi-9d??erator R L ~
Tim of Sample
Collection
I S I L
1 L
) < Z L
Tim of Sample
Collection
so2 0-A
1 7 . 7
( 7 - 7
1 7 . 6
1 2 . 7
Tfme of
Analysis
T i mc o f
Analysis
' 7 0 0
1
1 7 2 0
rco
C-B
Xvq
~ v g .
02 Read1 ng
8
( 8 . 7
i g 7
(8.6
Cof Read ng A
6 . 0
& . 0
L7.d
.4vg.
3 2
100-C f
I
$1.3 ,
1 .4vg.
co2 Read1 ng A
CO Reading
C
6
02 Read1 ng B
CO Reading
C
:02
B -A
XO
C-8
I
ISO%INETIC TYPE FIELO DATA SHEET (contfnued) . 2 O A R ~ ' H I U c o d a T RUN NUMBER em>-- /
SAMFLING LOCAT1 ON /.'fl.~tr .<A C k DATE G - / I - 9 0
I S O K I ~ I C TYPE FIELD DATA SHEET (continued) - * 24
-Am 6 f i q d d ~ i ~ C U ~ J ~ ' Ru?JNDMBER m h S / c SAXPLING LOCATION 4r$t n 0 a l ) ~ ~ r <f-&cK DATE & - r l - 4 d
IS~~UNETXC TYPE FIELO DATA SHEET (continued) ' ' 26 -ANY NAm 0 ~ 4 1 ~ ~ ATLL c a d $7: RUN NUXBER e l r l 5 - .? SAXPLITSG LOCATION = - Pfue t 5 - f ~ p k DATE - / I - 9 6
I
27 MOISTURE SAMPLING LABORCSTORY RESULTS
Plant Namo~ BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY EEI Rof 4 6700
Sampling Location: Dryor Stack
Date Recrivrdr 6/12 Date Analyzed: 6/12 Roagent Box(es)r 0536
Run Number Run Date
MS- 1 6/11
ANALYSIS OF MOISTURE CATCH
Reagent 1 ( H20 1 Final Weight, g. 997.5 1072.0 1080.5 Tared Weight, q. 544 . 5 373. 5 573.5
111111.1111 1111111111 1111111111
Water Catch,q. 453.0 496.5 507.0
Reagent 2 ( 1 Final Woight, g. Tarod Weight, g.
Water Catch, q.
Reagrnt 5 ( 1 Final Woight, go Tared Woight, q.
Wator Catch, q.
CONDENSED WATERl 90
S i l i c a t e l l Final Weight, g. Tared Weight, go
ADSORBED WATER, go
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, 9.
- - 28 P A R T I C U L A T E S A M P L I N G LABORCITORV RESULTS
Plant Namrt BARNHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY EEI Ref# 6780
Sampling L o c r t i o n ~ Dryer Stack
Date Rrcrivedt 6/12 Datr Analyzrd~ 6/16 Roagmnt Bon(mr)t 0556
Run Numbrr Run Datr
MS- 1 6/11
Sample ID/Containor #
Tarr Wright . , 9.
SAMPLE WT., g.
farm W t . , g.
SAMPLE WT. Q.
Sum of Pa r t i cu lat r , mg. 559.8 619.6 631.0 Total F i l t e r Tare, mq. 508.7 512.1 306.5
Blank Residue, mg. ( 175 m l ) 0.4 ( 200 m l ) 0.4 ( 200 m l ) 0.4 mm111mmmmm m11m1m1mm1 1 m m m 1 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL PART1 CULATE CATCH, mg . 50.7 107. 1 124.1
Blank Final Tar.
Beaker 9 2003 ---Logrnd--- Notes and Commmts wt. , mg. 99546.3 = F inal Weight wt . , mg. 99545.9 L = Looso Par t i cu la t r
Rosidur, mg, 0.4 F m F i l t o r D = Dish Volume, m l . 200 R n Rinar P n Pan
Concontration, mg/ml 0.002
ENTROPY
REAGENT BOX CUSTODY SHEET 29
sox No. 63 38 Aseembly Date Assembled By
, / * -
Plant Name /3 , / A EEI Ref. No. d 7 Y f l
sampling Loc. { f q , ;< Met hod /c? 4
Individual Tare of Reagent of D ? & a Individual Tare of Reagent ( d l (9) of
Individual Tare of Silica Gel -0 g.
Sample Appearance /3 ,, , , , , ~d,,
Sample Appearance /:,, , , ,.&,A,
Sample Appearance / ? T D ~ / , , owJ4 r I
Date box received back in lab 6 1 2 (Zr) Received by
A11 liquid levels at nark (check) YES NO - Balance zeroed and spanned (initials)
Estimate loss if not at ~ i k ; uee 'REWARI(S9 section.
REAGENT BOX INTEGRITY (check if locked or explain in "REMARKS") 1
Immediately after assembly in lab -/ In field, just prior to use - Immediately after field sample recovery - When received back at lab
REMARKS
APPENDIX B.2
B e FIELD AND ANALYTICAL DATA
2 . Plume Opacity
ENTROPY
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM No. (Y2 5- I . . -
COMPANY NAME
TTA~~NHILL C'L;N~~LPCTINC? Cc. STREET AOORESS
. i 5ZCj
C I N STATE 7p~T-, r\;c PHONE (KEY CONTACT) SOURCE 10 NUMBER
37%- qL.3-+ PROCESS EWPMENT OPERATING MOOE c;\c FICED 7>eve? m 7-31 - - --- --- -.- --
CONTROL EOUIPMENT
T.Ml &WC5
DESCRIBE EMISSION WWJT
I
-;rr~)nr r g o ~ LEVEL
-- A
DESCRIBE PLUMC WCKGROUND
SWI e 2 ,-e LULL- EM L L G u n S BACKG NO COLOR
. ~ l a n YOF ~ n d J
Slack wltn
SOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH DmwNaMAno*r
Plumm
Sun 4 8 .vend A
/'
m E r n ~ l @ o n Potnl
I. - :-A I'" .-
5. - OBSEAMR'S NMnf PRINT)
L134 h\ . ~ C ~ W I J > C ~ OBSERVER'S SIGMTURE
Fg4NUATlON . ,i k~T&j j / ~ U J ~ ( , ' C A I ~ E N ~ A L I S F ~ , (NL.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CERTlRED BY
m s m -gwk\~p..~ A m . -
C U ~ N U E D O N V M K W * I ) ~
OAT€
3 ~ ( A W ' j~
~ ( 5 ) - ( I (
SOURCE I0 NUMeER JWNE IWEY CCNTACTl
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM NO. 1\5- 1 i,:cLil ,
"CKXESS EOUIPMENT I
:;.WPANY NAME , I
OBSERVAnON OAT€ START ME END ME
Sun End
I SISTANCE FROM OBSERVER 31RECllON FROM OBSERVER
1 ZCNTROL EOUIPMENT
L w - - 1 SW E M
/ EMISSION COLOR IF WATER OAOPLn PLUME 0 5 c; (2 I sw , Ern ~nrcnma12
. W C
j POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACIW WAS O€ERMlN€D la C > ' O r_ C'
:
1 sun ~ n a 1 7 G 10 G fi - I SESCRIBE PLUME BACKGAOUNO
: 3ESCRIBE EMISSION POINT
2 - 1 7
- -
EM sba End WIND DIRECTION I NlNO SPEED
C l G C' C'
! .;tan EM sw EM
AMBIENT TEMP NCBULBTEMP 1 1 22 / 7, p- ,-. 1- % .-
I .-- ;tan ?.re 2 3 C/ G (-' <..
jOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH --- C -
4 s, (3. Plume ir '
I 1 - V ,
I OBSERVER'S NAME IPRlNn
I CITY STATE 3 P
N.C. t ?!+ONE IKEY C3NTACn 5OURCE I0 NUMBER
CI I "
\/ISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM No. ~ \ 5 - 2
1 PROCESS EQUIPMENT C L I
1 . \ I 1 - F I ~ C \ > 7 2 \ / c E i
I CONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERATING MODE 1
,3MPANY NAME b
J = A J ~ ~ H I L L I i lRERAOORESS
' OBSERVAWN OAT€ 3ART 7ME ENO ME
: s c \ T L L ~ "ID 13' 15- 14 IT / ' \ I 2 ' 5 :O 4 5 1 :OMUENTS
, - -
I
! I4 L.. ,, C i
POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS OmRMlNEO ;7 CJ
I +" r z.? *. / *EIGHT ABOVE GROUNO LEVEL nEKjnT REUnVE TO OBSERVER
t ,dk s u n 1 . : \ t ~ n d -
DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER OlRECnON FROM OBSERVER
DESCRIBE PLUME BACKGROUNO I
8MXGROu D COLOR 1 sm CQFIolTlONS 19 ' I C' (1 1
I sun - k ~ % W L € n d k-f .kc- :o Q I C I 6 0 WINO SPEEO WINO OIRECTION
i sun .' ~ h ~ m ,. sun EM 21 5 I G 15 I 0
1 AMBIENT TEMP #ET BUL0 TEMP *H mtufn ' --" I
I i lan _ /'
, I C' I, c- I I 5OURCE UYOUT SKETCH D n w ~ o n n A m
(0
' 2
I I
I Sun N out con Cane
.~)OITIONAL INFORM* MN
-- -
CONTINUED ON WE0 FOIIlJ NUMllER
0 C , j O : O
" 0 0 G i - I
i I
(_ <- I G I
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM No. tS\5-2 (cc,. ,
ZGMPANV NAME I OBSER~ATION D A q START ME END TIME 1 \ ;)LL~~E sfxi> 1-5. \ 5- 1 4 5
I I ' STREET ADORESS I I \ 1 .I .5 20 ' J S 1 COMMENTS
STATE J P
I L I
/ PROCESS EOUIPMENT , OPERATING MOO€ I
I
CONTROL EOUIPMENT OPEPATING MODE
I I DESCRIBE EMISSON POINT
1 HEIGHT AeOYE GROUND LEVEL I
HEIGHT REUTWE TO OBSERVER
I Sun B nd
/ DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER OlRECTlON FROM OBSERVER
sun ~ n d sun ~ n d I DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
EMISSION COLOR IF WATER OROPLET PLUME
POINT IN THE PLUME AT WMCH OPACITY WAS OmRMlNEO
SUn End
/ DESCRIBE PLUME BACKGROUND
S W EM BACKGROUND COLOR SKY CONOIWNS
SW Em sun End
WINO SPEED WINO OlRECTlON
I sun 5na Sun EM
1 AMBIENT TEMP .VET BULB TEMP an. #rcru
I I OBSERVER'S NAME IPRINTI 1 LI-.A < I & L ~ C L ~ \ A N ~ > C ~ ~ ~
OBSERVERS SIGNANFIE DATE
31 Ch (- , ~ 5 ; k l f - L l I f I ORGANUA~QN~ I
I Sun Cocac~on brio I
'JISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM No. y- 3 V
I 28MPANV NAME
-+LNI\\ LL iTREET ADDRESS
O ~ S E R V $ ~ O N OAF START ME 5NO nME
\ 1 1 . i h - '3" 15; >EC
I @ '41 5 30 25 ZOMMENTS -
8
4 ( a c1 3 G
PROCESS EOUIPMENT 7 !cli I-IEP "Rvr7-r
CONTROL EOUIPMENT OPERATING MOO€ 6 < C j l O C )
-%+ 1 ~ L L ~ E
DESCRl0E EMISSION W I N 1 I - -
I DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER DIRECTION FROM OBSERVER I 2 c' C; (-,
' J C J O N ( ; DESCRIBE EMISSIONS
1
EMISSION COLOR IF WATER OAOPJR PLUME
s w bh, EM POINT IN W E PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS OETERMINEO
;st i- sun \ \? -: t ~ & ---\v 1: &End
OESCRleE PLUME BACKGROUNO
s w i s \u>\ci< EM r ; \ ~ \ l BACKGROUNO COLOR SKY CONOIT~ONS
s w ~ b u - % n FLJ s w ~+~tr;b E n J WIND SPEED WINO OIRECTON
swL : ;~,,xql,\ EW, / I AMBIENT TEMP .VET BULB TEMP a n omom I -jl~n i;;~, '. ?..a J
~OURCE LAYOUT SKETCH ~ n r ~ a r n *rrar
1 wlna - i
OBSERVER S NAME tPRlNn I
I 5 A c r l ~ 6 5 ~ ~ 0 d L I
OPERVER S SIGNATURE DATE 1
\I ,L .?c I
EL-c-~ 4 (-LVIVUM~~((TAL[+T~> , 1 I
I j ~ ~ ~ ~ - Z e ~ ~ m ~ , ~ ~ ~ A K C ~ T A 3 K (;u D'' y 244 "
HEIGHT ABOVE GAOUNO LEVEL nElOHT REUll!VE TO
I l z h S w \ ' / [ + E M l 1 0 C; O ' C )
8
* A001TIONAL lNCORMArlON
I
c' C; (,I1<
CERTlFlEO 0V DATE
eASWhl <cUNtc - ALSC:G s ~ P ~ - I L ( ~ + ,
C O N T M I W O N V E O M R U ~
'JISIBLE EVISSION OBSERVATlON FORM ! - .. No. /,J\t,. ; ( i-; ;z
:ZMPANY NAME 1 I OBSERVATION OATE START TIME EN0 TIME
SESCRIBE EMISSION POINT -- 9
-'*ONE IKEY CCNTACn aOURCE I0 NUMBER 1
I 2QOCES.S EOUIPMENT 3 P E R * n N O s ~ ~ ~ ~
CONTROL EOUIPMENT OPEUATING MOOE
10 C; 0 , ; *EIGHT ABOVE GROUNO LEVEL *EIGHT REUnVE TO OBSERVER c ' l > , y JISTANCE FROM OBSERVER SlRECTION FROM OBSERVER 12 -- td3 \ cc 0
Sun Ind 13 (,' '1 5'
3ESCRlBE EMISSIONS I
--- ; Sun End - 1 EMISSKIN COLOR F WAER OROPW PLUME 1 15 - ic' L'/
/ s u n :nd
I
8ACKGROUNOCOLOR SKY CONOlTlONS I9 c, 20
WIND SPEED WINO OlRECTlON 0
21 d ' 0 { C j I C) I
AMBIENT TEMP .VR BULB TEMP an omam i 22 / Cy ) e)
I/L: (3 L' 01 J I O C 3 )
;ran = -a
31JCK I .OURCE LAYOUT SKETCH 6 ,
plume I ' "0 + >ma A L
7
1 - - -
[ OBSERVER'S NAME (PRlNn
C' , :j , - * C c;, 9- (*:
G I ~ ; A , ~ n - n L z s % ~ ~ b ~ k * OBSERVER'S SGNAWRE . OAT€
3 ( iLte~&L I I I \.JUIW ;C; h ORWNIU~W J
CERTIFIED B r OATE
,
APPENDIX C
CALIBRATION DATA
S l L M P L X N G EQUIP-NT CXEC-IS=.. 38
P l m t ~u/M&mm. d @I LLL Co AJ U- / R O & Y ~ ~ ~ * ~ T 4 . L . ~ o b NO. 678 d I
sampling ~ o c a t i o n 0 4 b n ou s E 5 i&r/i TmamLudrr Ski) --
Data b -\\-?o I kfmrmncm Thm-tar Autbi.nt Tempraturm, 'f a~ Ambient Accmpturcm Chock
Tamp.raturm, *? hnqm, 'P - OK? Themomterm
Impingar E x i t 8 \ * 2.0 - /
Adjust thermommtmr u n t i l acceptable. I f it cannot bm adjumtmd, umm am back- up. If no backup, rocord ambient temp. ind ica ted by unadjumtad thm-tar.
check OK?
v
** Acceptancm rangm i m 2 2 . 0 ' ~ i f umod i n r a t u r a t e d or w a t r r droplet- ladan 9.8 stream.
i
Field B u o w t o r
Z=l.Cro
Data
L . \ l - ? o
P i t o t NO.
4 - 2 0
Entropy In-Xoumm Roforencm B ~ o a ~ . t m t
zC\."lo
Viaual Chock - L,
Viaual Nort lo No. Chock - L o 7 /
Dry Gas Metel- IdenLi f l c a t l o n : -. - L83%323 - - . - - . - . - _ Cal L b r a t l o n by : ---A ~ . x N=C?\LL
Date : \G-\-(&? 0;nrornct.r i c I ' ressure ( r b ) : 29.33 i n . Ilg P A C ~ 2 OF 3.
#Date : 1~ -9-% nDnrometrlc I ' r e s s ~ l r e (Pb) : I n . llg
METERBOX
Ueterbox No. 1
FULLTEST
Calibrated By /n RC
Date 2 - 2 . 7 - 5 Barometric Preesure (Pb) 30.1 ( In* B9)
Date Barometric Pressure (Pb) (In. Bg)+
Standard Meter No. 6 8 3 B 3 2 3 Standard Meter Coef f lclent / 00 + J ~
STANDARD KETKR m Gae
Volume Temp. Time
(Vds) (tde) c f ' F Hin.
l l * u2= ~ . t " - " - } k
- -
I n . H20 In. H20 --
Average &cj>/ I / & is& ]
1. Coefficient range: 0.97-1.03.
2. Coefficient tolerance: for individual rune, i 0.02 from average.
3. AH@ range: 1.6-2.0.
4. AH@ tolerance: s 0.15 In. Hz0 over A H range of 0.4 In.-4.0 In.
P-1017 rw. 2-90
ON-SIT= DRY QM m T = R AUDIT 4 4
Data 6 - ( I . 9 0 Matar Box Iden t i f i ca t i on Number h))4
Auditor Y5 4)) B a r o m e t r i c Preemure (Pbar) 7 "I . Ci 0 In. ~g
Z m r o Magnehelics? (check)
Upper and Lower Limita f o r Audit Gammr
~ r y oam ata at Raading
( f t 3
1 n i t i a l 4 1 1 . l o
Final ql&, 394
[nin. + ( S a c . / 60)] 0.0319 (Tm + 460) y, r ....................
vm 1"
mter Temperature
( 'PI
~ n i t i a l 7 8
Final 8 C
D r y Gam Volunw m t a r a d
( f t 3
7 . 7 7 +
J Audit Gamma Within Accaptabla Limits? Y e 8 NO -
0 . 9 6 * Y = . 7 4 $ 4 ' L
1.04 Y = \ . O Z S O ~
Avoraga Motet Tanperature
( 'F)
,. 8 2
Run Time (Baae = 10)
[ 1 0 + ( 0 / 6011 Ye r .......................
(Min.)
1 o
(Sec.)
0 -
0.0319 ( $ 2 + 460) .................... I . 4 - ) ~ 6 6 I ) Calculatad Audit Y
Date G - I Ci CalLbrrtod By
B U - ~ C P ~ . . . ~ ( ~ b ) 3 (In. Hg) ~ t . r ~ x V ~ ~ -
Standard Meter N o . 1 0 t 7 0 S- ) ~tandard Meter ~oef f i c i ent / - Q I 6 y
Yd. * Vda * (td + 460) Pb yd a ""--"""--""---.-.---------.-
Vd (tdm + 460) (% + { O X / 13.6))
R-0011 r a . 3-90
Gam Volumm
(Vd.) af
Tmp. (td.1
?
I q . L - Y T ! 7 6
9 . ~ ~ ~ 7 1 > b I
q . ~ 5 / 5 ' : 7b
! . > I 3
A80 Ia, a20
/ . > k t
1 . 7 1 0 ,
I . ) 0 7 Avara9m ( . 0, 6 7
cocrf f . (yd)
I - 0 U ' j 7
I 007+
I . O u s 3
TWO (td)
*?
9 0
qL
q 3
G.8 V o l ~
(Vd) o f
V - ~ O
~-TJL(-
4.53+
T m ( 9 ) Ilin.
( 0
l o
( 3
I
Orif i ce S. t t ing
( AH) In, E20
2 . 7
L. 7
1 . 7
NOZZLE N U M B E R : z" 5 ~ i a . 5
*25U . ~ & c I
-2q9 , 2 5 0
,248 , 1 4 3
-2ct-7 2.45-
. L . O
7 t;;
015/
6 LYL
~ i a . 4
t t% .2+9 2 r U
r 5 0
,250 , >qd
- t c ~ p
.rqq . - ' '. c
,251 . L Y C
Average
O * J b " I /
n 240 0.2 49 " 0 . 2 4
0.24'1 0 , l J d ' '
a b - Z$S 0 . 2 ~ ~
I -- - J -.
*2F 1 - 2. 'f-'+
I
A
D i a . 2
e 2-51 2 , 2 4 7
. 2 1 / 4
2-4-c1 . ? J b .t43 . LcC4
. z q g 1: Y 7,
Dia . 1
2 9 ,249 . 2 q q 2 5 0
,245 , ? q4
z 24b
. , 2 5 1
- qc(
&I ;s $ id5 I
jvl ; S 5-1114
Date
/ 3
D l a . 3
4 296 02f4 .149
~ Z Y Y
.25a , > 4 3
.tq7 LQ3
. t < z LCIU
I n i t i a l s
m& e o
- 2 S l . L w-
I I rs ,go . q . ~ / f i
3-g-~'/
7 . J . s ~ 2-1-65 3 , < - q ( 7-17-65 t - & . v b
3 - r r - g ~ -
t ,.
311rlr - 1 .
~ h / / f ~ f
ZKG
~ N C LGML
Sf+ I N P U t .39 6 6 0~
L, 5 '7 .
3P 2kc 1
9-23 -8
I-5-90
3 L ) - 9 3
3kG I fltl SJ J R b J R r /
M L H
4, .ss,-M~ -/
L W
,251
.LY,>/
I
I
FEB 9 1990
AIR QUALITY PLANNING
t - -A
State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary February 9, 1990
R. Paul Wilrns Director
Mr. William Lee Cooper, Vice President Barnhill Contracting Company Post Office Box 1529 Tarboro, North Carolina 27886
Dear Mr. Cooper:
Subject: Air Permit No. 4876R2 Barnhi 1 1 Contract i ng Company Rocky Mount, North Carolina Edgecombe County
In accordance with your completed appl i cat i on received January 25, 1990, we are forwarding herewith Permit No. 4876R2 to Barnhi 1 1 Contracting Company, Rocky Mount, North Carol ina for the construction and operation of air mi ssion sources or air cleaning devices and appurtenances.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit, identifying the specific issues to be contended. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. Unless such demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
This permit shall be effective from February 9, 1990, until March 31, 1992, is nontransferable to future owners and operators, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
George T. ~verett"
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Arthur Mouberry Mr. Mike Aldridge
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7487 Telephone 919-733-7015
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO).MISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
AIR _ P _ E R M I I NO.4876R2 -
Issue Date: February 9, 1990 Effective Date: February 9, 1990
Expiration Date: March 31, 1992 Replaces Permit: 4876R
To construct and operate air emission sources or air cleaning devices, and for the discharge of the associated air contaminants into the atmosphere. In accordance with the provisions of Article 218 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Barnhill Contracting Company NC Highway 97 East
Rocky Mount, Edgecombe County, North Carol i na
FOR THE
construction and operation of air emission sources or air cleaning devices and appurtenances consisting of:
one bagfilter (9,919 square feet of filter area) installed on a liquid propane/No. 2 oil-fired (100 mill ion BTU per hour maximum heat input), rotary drum mix asphalt plant (340 tons per hour maximum production capacity) ,
to be constructed and operated in accordance with the completed application received January 25, 1990, and in conformity with the plans, specifications, and other supporting data, all of which are filed with the Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources and are incorporated as part of this Permit.
This Permit shall be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations including any testing, reporting, or monitoring requirements:
A. SPECIFIC COH)ITIONS AH) LIMITATIONS
1. The Permittee shall comply with applicable Environmental Management Commission Regulations, including 15A NCAC 2D .0516, .0524 Subpart I, and .0535.
2. Visible emissions from the facilities shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six-minute period, except that six-minute periods averaging not more than 87 percent opacity may occur not more than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour period.
Permit No. page 2
The Permittee shall take a1 1 reasonable precautions with any operation, process, handling, transportation, or storage facilities to prevent fugitive particulate emissions from becoming airborne.
For the asphalt plant operating at a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum capacity, the Permittee shall comply with all provisions including the notification, testing, and monitoring requirements contained i n Environmental Management Regulation 15A NCAC 20 .0524 "New Source Performance Standards" (NSPS) as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart I. NSPS performance testing is required for particulate and visible emissions using EPA Method(s) 1, 2, 3, 5, and 9. Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial start-up of the affected faci 1 ity, the Permittee shall conduct the required performance test(s) and submit a written report of the tests results to the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management. The Method 1 requirements of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources", should be considered during any construct ion and be met for emissions testing purposes. A1 1 associated testing costs are the responsibility of the Permittee.
When particulate, odorous, or visible emissions exceed Environmental Management Regulations for more than four hours the Regional Supervisor, Divisio of Environmental Management, Raleigh Region, (919)733-2314, shall be notified as promptly as possible but in no case later than 24 hours of becoming aware of the occurrence. Such notice shall specify the facility name and location, the nature and cause of the excess emissions, the time when first observed, the expected duration, and the estimated rate of emissions. This reporting require- ment does not allow the operation of the facility in excess of Environmental Management Comnission Regulations.
The Permittee shall provide written notice within 15 days of start-up of the new faci 1 i ties to the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management.
To afford the Division of Environmental Management Regional Office the opportunity to have an observer present, the Permittee shall provide the Regional Office in writing at least 15 days notice of any required performance test(s).
The Permittee shall maintain dust control over the plant premises and access roads.
Permit No. 4876R2 page 3
B. GENERAL OITIONS AH] LIMITATIONS
1. All reports, test data, monitoring data, notifications, and requests for renewal shall be submitted to the:
Regional Supervisor North Carolina Division of Environmental Management Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
2 . Reports on the operation and maintenance of the facility shall be submitted by the Permittee to the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management at such intervals and in such form and detail as may be required by the Division. Information required in such reports may include, but is not limited to process weight rates, firing rates, hours of operation, and preventive maintenance schedules.
3. Any changes in the information submitted in the application regarding facility emissions, or any changes that modify equipment or processes of existing permitted facilities, or any changes in the quantity or quality of materials processed that will result in previously unpermitted, new, or increased emissions must be reported to the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management. If appropriate, modifications to the permit may then be made by the Division of Environmental Management to reflect any necessary changes in the permit conditions. In no case are any new or increased emissions allowed that will cause violation of the emission limitations specified herein.
4. This Permit is subject to revocation or modificatlon by this Divi si on upon a determination that information contai ned in the application or presented in support thereof is incorrect, conditions under which this Permit was granted have changed, or violations of conditions contained in this Permit have occurred. The facility shall be properly operated and maintained at all times in such a manner to effect an overall reduction in air pollution.
5. Under the statutory authority of G.S. 143-215.3 (a)(2), no person shall refuse entry or access to any authorized representative of the Division of Environmental Management who requests entry for purposes of inspection, and who presents appropriate credentials, nor shall any person obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any such representative while in the process o f carrying out his official duties. Refusal of entry may constitute grounds for permit revocation and assessment of civil penalties.
6. This Permit is nontransferable by the Permittee. Future owners and operators must obtain a new air permit from the Division of Envlronmental Management.
Permit No. 4876R2 page 4
7. This Permit does not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying with all applicable requirements of any Federal, State, or Local water quality or land quality control authority.
8. The Permittee at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this Permit shall request Its extension by letter. The letter should include the permit number, the appropriate renewal fee, description of any modifications, and should be sent to the Regional Supervisor, Division of Environmental Management.
9. A violation of any term or condition of this Permit shall subject the Permittee to enforcement procedures contained in North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.114, including assessment of civil penalties.
Permit issued this the 9th day of February, 1990.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COWISSION
u& George T. Everett. ~ i r e w r Divi ; ion of Environmental Management By Authority of the Environmental Management Conmission
Air Permit No. 4876R2
AIR PERMIT REVIEW
APPLICANT SITE LOCATION COUNTY BARNHILL CONTRACTING CO. ROCKY MOUNT EDGECOMBE
CONTACT PHONE APPLICABIL1TY:NSPS NESHAP TAX OTHER LEE COOPER 9191823-1021 SUBPART I - APP NO. REVIEWER : SIGN- : \ DATE
\
011104 JERRY P. CLAYTON 02/06/90
RECOMMENDATION AND COMMENT: ISSUE PIN 4876R2
1. APPLICATION IS MADE FOR:
one bagfilter [9,919 square feet of filter area] installed on a liquid propanelNo. 2 oil-fired [lo0 million BTU per hour maximum heat input], rotary drum mix asphalt plant I340 tons per hour maximum production capacity],
2. CFM1s are 55,000. Air to cloth ratio is 5.5:l. Efficiency is stated to be 99.9%. Emission rate before control is stated to be 16,650 lbslhr. After control emissions would be 11.655 lbslhr and 51.05 tpy. Pressure drop across the bagfilter is stated to be 5" to 8" water.
The existing plant was a 260 tph unit with a smaller NGINO. 2/No. 4 oil burner. Control was a bagfilter. New allowable per NSPS, Subpart I is:
[ss,Ooo] [I-,051 [29.92/29.92] [528/(460 + 300)] = 36,300 DSCF
[36,300 DSCF] I0.04 grlDSCF] [ l lb/7,000 gr] [60 min] = 12.445 lbslhr.
Annual allowable emissions would be 54.51 tpy, Emission factor per AP-42, T. 8.1-3 [bagfilter] is 0.02 lblton. Old emissions at 260 tons per hour would be 5.2 lbslhr and 22.776 tpy. Emissions are are increased: 112.445 - 5.21 = 7.2 lbslhr. The bagfilter if properly maintained and operated will comply with applicable regulations. The existing plant burned LPINo. 2 oil. The new plant will also burn LPINo. 2 oil.
3. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants [NESHAP] do not apply. A11 applicable DEM air regulations should be met. Recommend issuance of the air permit. Regional Office concurs. Ref: telcon w / R . Schuster on 02/06/90,
4. The existing source is major. Emissions changes are less the de miniu~us; therefore Prevention of Significant Deterioration does not apply.
cc: Mike Aldridge
