Upload
geo-zaharia
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
1/16
Comparative floral anatomy and ontogeny in Magnoliaceae
F. Xu1 and P. J. Rudall2
1South China Botanical Garden, Academia Sinica, Guangzhou, China2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK
Received November 16, 2004; accepted June 9, 2005
Published online: March 8, 2006
Springer-Verlag 2006
Abstract. Floral anatomy and ontogeny are de-
scribed in six species of Magnoliaceae, representing
the two subfamilies Liriodendroideae (Liriodendron
chinese and L. tulipifera) and Magnolioideae,
including species with terminal flowers (Magnolia
championi, M. delavayi, M. grandiflora, M. pae-
netalauma) and axillary flowers (Michelia crassipes).
The sequence of initiation of floral organs is from
proximal to distal. The three distinct outermost
organs are initiated in sequence, but ultimately form
a single whorl; thus their ontogeny is consistent with
a tepal interpretation. Tepals are initiated in whorls,
and the stamens and carpels are spirally arranged,
though the androecium shows some intermediacy
between a spiral and whorled arrangement. Carpels
are entirely free from each other both at primordial
stages and maturity. Ventral closure of the style
ranges from open in Magnolia species examined to
partially closed inMichelia crassipesand completely
closed inLiriodendron, resulting in a reduced stigma
surface. Thick-walled cells and tannins are present
in all species except Michelia crassipes. Oil cells are
normally present. Floral structure is relativelyhomogeneous in this family, although Liriodendron
differs from other Magnoliaceae in that the
carpels are entirely closed at maturity, resulting
in a relatively small stigma, in contrast to the
elongate stigma of most species of Magnolia. The
flower ofMagnoliadoes not terminate in an organ
or organ whorl but achieves determinacy by gradual
diminution.
Key words: Floral development, Floral morphology,
Liriodendron, Magnolia, Michelia.
Introduction
Magnoliaceae are a well-defined and horticul-
turally important family of about 230 species
of trees and shrubs characterised by large
flowers with numerous tepals and fertile partsinserted separately on an elongated axis. More
than 80% of species of Magnoliaceae are
distributed in subtropical and tropical regions
of eastern Asia; the remainder occur in Amer-
ica, indicating a relictual tropical disjunction
(Azuma et al. 2001). Renewed debate on the
systematics of the family has been stimulated
by several recent cladistic analyses, both
morphological (Li and Conran 2003) and
molecular (Shi et al. 2000), but several out-
standing questions remain.
Dandy (1927) proposed the first compre-hensive taxonomic treatment of Magnoliaceae,
which recognised ten genera distributed in two
tribes: Liriodendreae (sole genus Liriodendron)
and Magnolieae, including Magnolia, Mang-
lietia, Michelia, and six smaller genera. Sub-
sequent authors have proposed several
different infrafamilial taxonomic schemes, but
Pl. Syst. Evol. 258: 115 (2006)
DOI 10.1007/s00606-005-0361-1
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
2/16
all of them divide the family into two
subfamilies, of which one, Liriodendroideae,
includes the sole genus Liriodendron, and the
other, Magnolioideae, includes a variable
number of genera. Laws (1984) Magnolioideae
included two tribes: Magnolieae, with terminal
flowers, and Michelieae, with axillary flowers.
Nooteboom (1985) and Cheng and Noote-
boom (1993) reduced genera of Magnolioideae
first to six genera (Chen and Nooteboom 1993)
and later to two, and discarded all tribes and
subtribes (Nooteboom 2000). Thus, there is no
disagreement about the status of Liriodend-
roideae containing only Liriodendron; this
isolated placement is also strongly supported
by analyses of nucleotide sequences in which
Liriodendronwas consistently sister to all otherMagnoliaceae (Qiu et al. 1995, Ueda et al.
2000, Shi et al. 2000, Kim et al. 2001). How-
ever, relationships within Magnolioideae
remain equivocal; in all analyses, including
chloroplast DNA sequence data from matK
(Shi et al. 2000), and ndhF (Kim et al. 2001,
2004), the large genusMagnoliais paraphyletic
with respect to the other smaller genera. Li and
Conran (2003) recommended placement of the
smaller genera of Magnolioideae within a
broadly circumscribed Magnolia, but high-lighted the need for more morphological data
to improve phylogenetic resolution within this
group. Many species of Magnoliaceae are
known only from fossils (e.g. Frumin and
Friis 1999, Kim et al. 2004), making combined
morphological and molecular analysis highly
desirable in this group.
The large magnolia flower was once con-
sidered to represent the primitive floral type
(the Ranalian hypothesis), based mainly on the
existence of many fossil forms. However, recent
improved understanding of phylogenetic rela-tionships, together with new fossil discoveries,
have demonstrated that small flowers with
relatively few organs predominate in early-
divergent angiosperms (magnoliids). The large
flowers of Magnoliaceae are now normally
regarded as relatively specialised within this
grade (for reviews see Crane et al. 1994,
Endress 1994a). Here we examine floral
anatomy and ontogeny of a broad taxonomic
range of species of Magnoliaceae in a system-
atic context. The floral morphology of Mag-
noliaceae has been investigated by several
authors, including Baillon (1866), Howard
(1948), Skvortsova (1958) and Melville (1969).
Influential studies of floral vasculature include
those of Canright (1960), Tucker (1961), Skip-
worth and Philipson (1966), Skipworth (1970)
and Ueda (1982, 1986). Earlier work on floral
ontogeny in Magnoliaceae includes
investigations of the floral apex and carpel ofMichelia fuscata (Tucker 1960, 1961), carpel
development inMagnolia stellataand Michelia
montana (Van Heel 1981, 1983), and floral
ontogeny in Liriodendron tulipifera and Mag-
nolia denudata (Erbar and Leins 1994, Leinsand Erbar 1994, Leins 2000).
Materials and methods
Species examined were chosen as representatives of
the taxa with terminal flowers (species ofMagnolia
L.), those with axillary flowers (species ofMichelia
T. Durand) and Liriodendron L. Specimens at a
range of developmental stages were collected either
from the Botanical Garden at the South China
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences(SCBI), or the Living Collections, Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew (K). Voucher specimens of samples
collected from South China Institute of Botany
were deposited in SCBI. The following species were
investigated: Magnolia championi Benth. (section
Gwillimia) (SCBI: FX Xu 03011), M. delavayi
Franch. (section Gwillimia) (SCBI: FX Xu 03019),
M. grandifloraL. (section Theorhodon) (SCBI: FX
Xu 03008),M. paenetalaumaDandy (SCBI: FX Xu
03014), Michelia crassipesY.W.Law (SCBI: FX Xu
03016), Liriodendron chinense Sargent (SCBI: FX
Xu 03022) and L. tulipifera L. (K: 193977308).Material was fixed in formalin acetic alcohol
(FAA: 70% alcohol, formaldehyde and glacial
acetic acid in a ratio of 85:10:5). For scanning
electron microscope (SEM) examination, buds were
dehydrated in an ethanol series. Dehydrated mate-
rial was then critical-point-dried using a Baltec
CPD 030 critical point drier, mounted onto SEM
stubs using double-sided adhesive tape, coated with
platinum using an Emitech K550 sputter coater,
2 F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
3/16
and examined using a Hitachi cold field emission
SEM S-4700-II at 45 KV. For light microscope
(LM) observations, material was embedded in resin
prior to sectioning. Fixed flowers and buds were
dehydrated in an ethanol series to absolute ethanol,
then transferred through an absolute ethanol : LRwhite resin series to absolute resin, and kept in a
fridge for about a week, with daily changes of resin.
Specimens were then moved to gelatine capsules
and polymerized between 5862C at 600 mbar
pressure for about 21 hours. Once cooled, the resin
specimens were sectioned at 5lm thickness using a
Leica microtome. Sections were stained in Tolui-
dine Blue and mounted in DPX (Sigma-Aldrich
Co., Gillingham, UK). Photomicrographs were
taken using a Leitz Diaplan photomicroscope with
a digital camera.
Results
Floral morphology and anatomy
Flowers are solitary, bisexual, and haplomor-
phic, i.e. with spirally arranged organs inserted
separately onto an elongated axis. A ring of
three bract-like structures surrounds the flow-
er; these are normally interpreted as bracts, but
sometimes as sepals. The perianth consists of
normally nine free tepals which surround
numerous free stamens and carpels respectively
(Figs. 16).
Androecium. In all species except Lirioden-
dron, the stamens have long slender non-
marginal sporangia which are embedded in
the adaxial surface of the microsporophyll. In
Magnoliaand Michelia species examined here,
the stamen apices (connective appendages) are
short, and there is no distinct filament, so that
the stamens cannot readily be differentiated
into filament, anther, and connective. By
contrast, in Liriodendron the sporangia aremarginal in position and the filaments are
thread-like. At anthesis, sporangia are introrse
in Magnolia and Michelia but extrorse in
Liriodendron. Shape of stamens in Liriodendron
and several Magnolioideae was also studied by
Endress (1994b).Gynoecium. The total number of carpels in
a flower varies between species. In Magnolia
championi and Magnolia paenetalauma, the
number is around ten; but over 90 are present
in Magnolia delavayi (Fig. 1) and 4050 in
Magnolia grandiflora (Fig. 2).
In material examined here, carpels were
entirely separate from each other; no connec-
tion or adnation was observed at any position
in any species examined here (Figs. 8, 9, 20, 21,
30, 31, 36, 37). The carpel-bearing region of
the reproductive apex is cylindrical inMichelia
crassipes, Magnolia championi and Magnolia
paenetalauma to sub-ovoid in Magnolia dela-
vayiand Magnolia grandiflora. InLiriodendron
the carpel-bearing region of the reproductive
apex is more or less conical. This region of the
flower is stipitate, formed by the sterile part of
Figs. 16. Flowers of Magnoliaceae. Fig. 1. Magno-
lia delavayi. Fig. 2. Magnolia championi. Fig. 3.
Michelia crassipes. Fig. 4. Liriodendron tulipifera.
Fig. 5. Magnolia grandiflora. Fig. 6. Magnolia pae-
netalauma
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 3
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
4/16
the carpels, a petiole-like stipe in Michelia
crassipes and all Magnolia species examined,
but not in Liriodendron. In Magnolia champi-
oni, M. paenetalauma and Liriodendron the
carpels are glabrous, but pubescent inMagnolia
grandiflora, Magnolia delavayi and Michelia
crassipes. Each carpel possesses a single style
with three vascular traces, a median and two
ventrals (Figs. 7, 17, 26, 32). Style shape and
length varies from narrow, semi-erect, and
elongated in Magnolia paenetalauma to com-
paratively stout and recurved in Magnolia
grandiflora. In Liriodendron the style is elon-
gate, broad, flattened and wing-like, and con-
tains numerous aggregations of thick-walled
cells (Figs. 34, 40). The extent of the stigmatic
epidermal papillae is variable between species.The stigma inLiriodendrondiffers from that of
species of subfamily Magnolioideae in that it is
small and localized, formed of epidermal
papillae (Fig. 38). Magnolia paenetalauma
(Figs. 10, 11) has a small stigmatic crest of
unicellular epidermal papillae which are longer
than other epidermal cells, whereas in Magno-
lia championi and Michelia crassipes the uni-
cellular epidermal papillae resemble other
epidermal cells (Fig. 24). The ventral suture
of the carpels is not closed in open flowers ofthe Magnolia species examined here (Figs. 22,
23), and only partially closed in Michelia
crassipes, in which the ventral suture is open
at the upper part of style (Fig. 29) but firmly
fused at the lower part (Figs. 27, 28) so that
the line of fusion completely disappears. In
Liriodendron the ventral suture in the style is
completely closed (Figs. 32, 33).
Ovules are inserted at the inner edge of the
carpel margin (see also Erbar 1983). There are
two ovules per carpel in all species examined
here. Crystals were not present in the integu-ments of species examined here, in contrast to
the material examined by Igersheim and En-
dress (1997).Idioblasts and sclereids. Idioblastic (soli-
tary) oil cells were present in all species
investigated here. They are circular and scat-
tered in the carpel parenchyma from the style
to the ovary, in the tissues (Figs. 15, 18) or
subepidermally in Magnolia paenetalauma
(Fig. 12). Mature oil cells are filled with a
large vacuole and a cupule, which is a common
character of oil cells (Mariani et al. 1989), was
observed in some slides (Figs. 15, 18).
Dark-staining tanniniferous cells were
present in most species, although they are
sparse or absent in Michelia crassipes. In
Magnolia championi (Figs. 18, 19, 25) they
are scattered throughout the carpel from style
to ovary and also concentrated under the
epidermis to form a ring of tanniniferous cells.
In Magnolia paenetalauma, tanniniferous cells
are only observed aggregated in the chalazal
region (Fig. 16) or scattered sparsely in the
ovary. In Liriodendron, tannins are present in
the outer integument and the distal portion ofthe inner integument (Fig. 35).
Numerous aggregations of thick-walled
cells or solitary idioblastic sclereids were
observed in all species except Michelia crassi-
pes, also reported for Magnoliaceae by Can-
right (1960), and Igersheim and Endress (1997).
These cells have lamellar thickened walls,
obvious cytoplasm, large intercellular spaces
and well-developed plasmodesmata (Figs. 13,
14). They are distributed from the style to the
ovary in Magnolia championi, Magnoliapaenetalauma and Liriodendron chinense,
although those of the latter possess compara-
tively thinner walls (Fig. 39). In the upper part
of the style ofMagnolia championi, the group of
thick-walled cells are associated with the
median veins, which is not connected in
Magnolia paenetalauma. From the middle part
of style, they are associated with both the median
and lateral veins in these two species. They are
totally free from the veins in Liriodendron.
In confirmation of the observations of
Canright (1960), carpel vasculature is similarin Magnolia and Michelia; the apical carpelsare supplied entirely from the central vascular
cylinder of the axis, while carpels from the
middle to the base are all supplied by both the
cortical and stelar systems. By contrast, in
Liriodendron, all carpels are supplied by
vasculature from both the cortex and central
vascular cylinder.
4 F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
5/16
Floral development
Floral apex. At initiation, the floral apex is
circular (Figs. 41, 53, 62, 71, 83) in all species
examined, and subsequently develops three
tepals surrounding a triangular floral primor-dium (Figs. 43, 54, 64). During subsequent
floral development the shape of the floral apex
varies from flat during perianth initiation
(Figs. 44, 57, 65) to highly convex at laterfloral stages (Figs. 49, 60, 68, 7476). The later
convex shape of the apex is maintained
through appendage initiations. Tepals,
stamens and carpels are initiated at slightly
different levels around the periphery of the
apex. The members of each group of organs
are initiated closely in time.
Figs. 716. Magnolia paenetalauma. Transverse sections of mature flower. Fig. 7. Floral apex, showing three
fully developed carpels in the last tier, each with 3 vascular bundles (white arrows). Fig. 8. Carpellary region,
showing carpels closely appressed, but not fused. Fig. 9. detail of Fig. 9, showing carpels closely appressed.
Fig. 10. Stigmatic epidermal papillae. Fig. 11. Detail of Fig. 10. Fig. 12. Subepidermal oil cell. Fig. 13. Upper
carpels, showing aggregations of thick-walled cells in each carpel. Fig. 14.Detail of thick-walled cells in Fig. 13,
free from the vascular bundles. Fig. 15.Oil cell (black arrow). Fig. 16.Tanniniferous cells in chalazal region of
ovule. All bars = 50 lm
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 5
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
6/16
Figs. 1725 Magnolia championi. Transverse sections of mature flower. Fig. 17. Single carpel, showing three
vascular traces (black arrows) interspersed with regions of thick-walled cells. Fig. 18. Oil cell and tanniferouscells. Fig. 19. Single carpel, showing aggregations of thick-walled cells and subepidermal tannins. Fig. 20.
Carpels including ovules; carpels closely appressed but not fused to each other; note insertion to axis. Fig. 21.
Detail of Fig. 20, showing carpels closely appressed. Fig. 22. Carpel below ovule, showing ventral suture.
Fig. 23. Detail of Fig. 22, showing open ventral suture. Fig. 24. Stigma, showing unicellar epidermal papillae.
Fig. 25. Tanniniferous cells (arrowed) in chalazal region of ovule. All bars = 50 lm
6 F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
7/16
Tepals. The three outer tepals are initiated
in sequence (Figs. 42, 56, 59, 63) but ultimately
form a single whorl (Figs. 43, 54, 64). At this
stage, the shape of the floral primoridum
changes from circular to triangular (Figs. 43,
54, 64). The second whorl of three semicircular
tepal primordia are initiated at the tips of the
three angles formed by the triangular floral
primordium and alternate with the outer tepal
whorl (Figs. 44, 57, 65). One of them is
initiated slightly earlier than the other two
(Figs. 6567). Similarly, the innermost third
whorl of three perianth primordia differ
slightly from one another in time of initiation
and alternate with those of the middle whorl
and hence are opposite those of the first whorl
(Figs. 45, 46, 68, 72, 73). Thus, the tepals are
initiated in spiral acropetal succession, but are
trimerously whorled; the internodes between
petals seldom elongate. There is a considerable
difference in size between primordia of the first
and the second whorl during early stages
(Fig. 73). Following completion of tepal initi-
ation, the central floral primordium is more or
less circular (Figs. 4749, 68, 7476).
Stamens. Stamen primordia are initiated
at the same time or slightly later than the third
whorl of perianth primordia. One or two
stamen primordia arise opposite (in the same
sector as) the first tepal primordia (Figs. 46,
47, 68). Stamens are initiated acropetally,
successively and rapidly around the base of
the apex (Figs. 48, 49, 60, 76, 77, 84). The
order of stamen initiation within each whorl is
Figs. 2631. Michelia crassipes.Transverse sections of mature flower. Fig. 26.Single carpel, with three vascular
traces (black arrows); thick walled cells absent; the ventral suture is closed. Fig. 27.Lower part of style.Fig. 28.
Detail of Fig. 27, showing closed ventral suture. Fig. 29. Upper part of style, showing open ventral suture.
Fig. 30. Carpellary region, showing free carpels. Fig. 31. Detail of Fig. 30. All bars = 50 lm
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 7
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
8/16
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
9/16
Figs. 4152. Magnolia paenetalauma. Floral development (SEM). Figs. 4143. Differentiation of three outer
tepals surrounding the triangular floral apex. Fig. 44. Differentiation of second tepal whorl, one tepal slightlyearlier than the other two. Fig. 45. Initiation of three outer and three middle tepals, and first tepal of inner
whorl. Figs. 4648. Differentiation of third tepal whorl and stamens. Fig. 49. Acropetal initiation of stamens.
At this stage the floral apex reaches its greatest height and diameter.Fig. 50.Differentiation of carpels, showing
carpel primordia larger than those of stamens. Fig. 51.Differentiation of carpels, showing the carpel primordia
initiated alternately and in series of four to five. Fig. 52.Older stage. Abbreviations:c= carpel;f= floral apex;
s= stamen;t1= tepal of first whorl;t2= tepal of second whorl;t3= tepal of third whorl. All bars = 100 lm
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 9
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
10/16
not determined. During stamen development,
the floral apex displays its greatest height and
diameter. In Liriodendron tulipifera and Mag-
nolia delavayi the outermost stamens are
broader and petaloid at older stages (Figs. 61,
88).
Carpels. When all stamen primordia have
been initiated and begun to broaden, the
remaining floral apex becomes slightly flatter.
Some rounded bulges are initiated in series of
four to five, which are larger than the stamen
primordia (Figs. 50, 51, 55, 69, 78, 80, 81, 85,
86). Carpel primordia are free and are initiatedin acropetal succession (Figs. 50, 51, 58, 69, 70,
79, 87). During carpel initiation, the floral apex
gradually diminishes in height and diameter.
At the middle or late stage of ontogeny, the
margins of each carpel are incurved, forming a
deep ventral groove which extends to the tip
(Figs. 51, 55, 58, 7982, 87, 88). There is no
differentiation of stigma and style at this stage.
In older buds of all species examined here,
stamens and carpels are arranged irregularly
on the floral axis (Figs. 52, 61, 70, 82, 88).
Figs. 5361. Magnolia delavayi. Floral development (SEM). Figs. 53, 56, 59. Differentiation of outer tepals.
Fig. 54. Three outer tepals initiated surrounding triangular floral primordium. Fig. 55. Differentiation of
carpels, showing carpel primordia initiated in series of four to five. Fig. 57. Initiation of three middle tepals.
Fig. 58. Differentiation of carpels, showing deep ventral groove extending to the tip of each carpel. Fig. 60.
Initiation of stamens. Fig. 61. Older stage of flower bud, showing arrangement of stamens and carpels, and
outermost petaloid stamens. Abbreviations: c = carpel; f= floral apex; s = stamen; ps = petaloid stamens;
t1= tepal of first whorl; t2 = tepal of second whorl; t3 = tepal of third whorl. All bars = 100 lm
10 F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
11/16
Discussion
Our observations correspond with those of
other investigations, such as Tuckers (1961)
observations on Michelia fuscata, that apical
growth continues during floral development inMagnoliaceae, but the floral apex gradually
diminishes in diameter and height during
carpel initiation. Thus, the flower of Magnoli-
aceae is not a true determinate structure,
since it does not terminate in an organ or
organ whorl, as in typical eudicot flowers.
Rather, the floral meristem achieves determi-nacy by gradual diminution (Tucker 1960,
1979), as with the indeterminate apex of
racemose inflorescences.
Floral ontogeny in Magnoliaceae is remark-
ably homogeneous throughout the family, with
tepals arranged in a more or less whorled
pattern surrounding more or less irregularly
arranged fertile organs. Erbar and Leins (1994)
observed an intermediate organisation in
Magnolia denudataand Liriodendron tulipifera,
Figs. 6270. Magnolia cha (SEM). Fig. 62. Floral apex. Fig. 63. Differentiation of first tepal of outer whorl.
Fig. 64.Subsequent differentiation of outer tepal whorl surrounding the triangular floral primordium. Fig. 65
67.Differentiation of middle tepal whorl, one tepal slightly earlier than the other two. Fig. 68. Initiation of
stamens (arrow). Fig. 69. Differentiation of carpels, showing the carpel primordia initiated in series of four to
five.Fig. 70. Older stage, showing irregular arrangement of stamens and carpels. Abbreviations: c = carpel; f
= floral apex;s = stamen;t1= tepal of first whorl;t2= tepal of second whorl; t3= tepal of third whorl. All
bars = 100 lm
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 11
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
12/16
Figs. 7182. Magnolia grandiflora. Floral development (SEM). Fig. 71. Floral apex. Figs. 7273. Initiation of
three tepal whorls. Fig. 7476.Initiation of third tepal whorl and stamens. At this stage the floral apex reachesits greatest height and diameter.Fig. 77.Acropetal initiation of stamens. Fig. 78.Initiation of carpels, showing
carpel primordia larger than stamen primordia. Figs. 7981. Differentiation of carpels, showing carpel
primordia initiated alternately, and in series of four to five. A deep ventral groove extends to the tip of each
carpel. The floral apex gradually diminishes in height and diameter. Fig. 82.Older stage of flower bud, showing
irregular arrangement of stamens and carpels. Abbreviations: c = carpel; f= floral apex; s = stamen; t1 =
tepal of first whorl; t2 = tepal of second whorl; t3 = tepal of third whorl. All bars = 100 lm
12 F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
13/16
and suggested that a whorled condition is
derived from a spiral one in basal angiosperms
(Erbar 1983, 1988; Erbar and Leins 1982, 1983,
1994). In some Magnolioideae not examined
here, such as Pachylarnax, Dugandiodendron,
andWoonyoungia(Li and Conran 2003) carpel
number is reduced to less than ten. Van Heel
(1983) described early carpel formation in
Michelia montana, which is unusual in possess-
ing only two to four stalked carpels arranged in
pairs.
One outstanding question of floral mor-
phology in Magnoliaceae is whether the out-
ermost organs represent bracts, as indicated by
their mature structure, or tepals, as Ueda
(1986) proposed. The three distinct outermost
organs are initiated in sequence, but ultimatelyform a single whorl; thus their ontogeny is
consistent with a tepal interpretation.
Both species ofLiriodendronexamined here
differ from other Magnoliaceae in that the
carpels are entirely closed at maturity, resulting
in a relatively small stigma, in contrast to the
elongate stigma of most species of Magnolia.
No carpel fusion was observed here in species of
Magnolioideae, either in primordial or mature
structures. In some other early-diverging an-
giosperms, including the ANITA grade and
some magnoliids (Endress and Igersheim 2000),
carpel closure is entirely by secretion rather
than by postgenital fusion. However, this char-
acter may be variable in Magnoliaceae, and
requires further investigation. Nooteboom
(1985) reported carpel fusion in some of the
smaller genera of Magnolioideae, such as Tal-
auma, Aromadendron and Tsoongiodendron, in
which the fruit is a syncarp. Li and Conran
(2003) reported that in all Magnoliaceae thecarpels are connate to varying degrees before
dehiscence; this conflicts with our data, but
indicates that some late fusion or concrescence
may occur. In Michelia crassipes, the ventral
Figs. 8388. Liriodendron tulipifera. Floral development (SEM). Fig. 83. Floral apex. Fig. 84. Initiation of
stamens. Figs. 85, 86. Initiation of carpels, showing carpel primordia initiated in series of four to five. Fig. 87.
Carpel differentiation, showing a deep ventral groove extending to the tip of each carpel; the floral apex
gradually diminishes in height and diameter. Fig. 88. Older stage of flower bud, showing arrangement of
stamens and carpels, and outermost petaloid stamens. Abbreviations:c= carpel;f= floral apex;ps= petaloid
stamen; s = stamen. All bars = 100 lm
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 13
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
14/16
carpel suture is closed in the lower part of the
style, so that the stigmatic region is relatively
short. Michelia crassipes also differs from the
other species examined in the absence of thick-
walled cells and tannins. Wider sampling is
necessary to determine the significance of these
characters. However, we concur with Noote-
boom (1985) that concrescence of the carpels
alone is not a reliable character for delimitation
of genera in Magnoliaceae.
We thank Chrissie Prychid (Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew) for help in the laboratory. The project
was supported by the National Sciences Founda-
tion of China (grant number 30000011, 30370108)
and the National Sciences Foundation of Guang-
dong province, China (grant number 000991). We
are grateful to Peter Endress and an anonymous
reviwer for their comments on the manuscript.
References
Azuma H., Garcia-Franco J. G., Rico-Gray V.,
Thien L. B. (2001) Molecular phylogeny of the
Magnoliaceae: The biogeography of tropical and
temperate disjunctions. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 2275
2285.
Baillon H. E. (1866) Sur la famille des Magno-
liace es. Adansonia 1: 133192.
Canright J. E. (1952) The comparative morphologyand relationships of the Magnoliaceae I. Trends
of specialization in the stamens. Amer. J. Bot.
39: 484497.
Canright J. E. (1960) The comparative morphology
and relationships of the Magnoliaceae III. Car-
pels. Amer. J. Bot. 47: 145155.
Chen B. L., Nooteboom H. P. (1993) Notes on
Magnoliaceae III: the Magnoliaceae of China.
Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 9991104.
Crane P. R., Friis E. M., Pedersen K. R. (1994)
Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of
magnoliid angiosperms. Pl. Syst. Evol. s8: 5172.Dandy J. E. (1927) The genera of Magnoliaceae.
Kew Bull. 1927: 275264.
Endress P. K. (1994a) Floral structure and evolu-
tion of primitive angiosperms: recent advances.
Pl. Syst. Evol. 192: 7997.
Endress P. K. (1994b) Shapes, sizes and evolution-
ary trends in stamens of Magnoliidae. Bot.
Jahrb. Syst. 115: 429460.
Endress P. K., Igersheim A. (2000) Gynoecium
structure and evolution in basal angiosperms.
Int. J. Plant. Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.): S211S223.
Erbar C. (1983) Zum Karpellbau einiger Magnoli-
iden. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 104: 331.
Erbar C. (1988) Early developmental patterns inflowers and their value for systematics. In:
Leins P., Tucker S. C., Endress P. K. (eds.)
Aspects of floral development J. Cramer, Berlin,
pp. 723.
Erbar C., Leins P. (1982) Zur Spirale in Magnolien-
blu ten. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 56: 225241.
Erbar C., Leins P. (1983) Zur Sequenz von
Blu tenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. Bot.
Jahrb. Syst. 103: 433449.
Erbar C., Leins P. (1994) Flowers in Magnoliidae
and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of
the angiosperms. I. The relationships betweenflowers of Magnoliidae and Alismatidae. Pl.
Syst. Evol. Suppl. 8: 193208.
Frumin S., Friis E. M. (1999) Magnoliid reproduc-
tive organs from the Cenomanian-Turonian of
north-western Kazakhstan: Magnoliaceae and
Illiciaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 216: 265288.
Howard R. A. (1948) The morphology and sys-
tematics of the West Indian Magnoliaceae. Bull.
Torr. Bot. Club 75: 335357.
Igersheim A., Endress P.K. (1997) Gynoecium
diversity and systematics of the Magnoliales
and winteroids. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 124: 213271.
Kim S., Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Suh Y. (2004)DNA sequences from Miocene fossils: an ndhF
sequence of Magnolia latahensis (Magnoliaceae)
and an rbcL sequence ofPersea pseudocarolin-
ensis (Lauraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 91: 615620.
Kim S., Park C. W., Kim Y. D., Suh Y. (2001)
Phylogenetic relationships in family Magnolia-
ceae inferred fromndhF sequences. Amer. J. Bot.
88: 717728.
Law Y. W. (1984) A preliminary study on the
taxonomy of the family Magnoliaceae. Acta
Phytotax. Sin. 22: 80109.
Leins P. (2000) Blu te und Frucht. Schweizerbart:Stuttgart.
Leins P., Erbar C. (1994) Flowers in Magnoliidae
and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of
the angiosperms. II. The relationships between
flowers of Magnoliidae, Dilleniidae, and Caryo-
phyllidae. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl 8: 208218.
Li J., Conran J. G. (2003) Phylogenetic relation-
ships in Magnoliaceae subfam. Magnolioideae: a
14 F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
15/16
morphological cladistic analysis. Pl. Syst. Evol.
242: 3347.
Mariani P., Cappeletti E. M., Campoccia D.,
Baldan B. (1989) Oil cell ultrastructure and
development in Liriodendron tulipifera L. Bot.
Gaz. 150: 391396.Melville R. (1969) Studies in floral structure and
evolution. I. Magnoliales. Kew Bull. 23: 133
180.
Nooteboom H. P. (1985) Notes on Magnoliaceae,
with a revision of Pachylarnax and Elmerrillia
and the Malesian species of Manglietia and
Michelia. Blumea 31: 65121.
Nooteboom H. P. (2000) Different looks at the
classification of the Magnoliaceae. In: Liu Y. H,
Fan H. M., Chen Z. Y., Wu Q. G., Zeng Q. W.
(eds.) Proceedings of the international sympo-
sium of the family Magnoliaceae 2637. SciencePress, Beijing, China.
Qiu Y. L., Chase M. W., Parks C. R. (1995) A
chloroplast DNA phylogenetic study of the
eastern Asiaeastern north America disjunct
section Rytidospermum of Magnolia (Magnolia-
ceae). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 15821588.
Shi S., Jin H., Zhong Y., He X., Huang Y., Tan F.,
Boufford D. E. (2000) Phylogenetic relationships
of the Magnoliaceae inferred from cpDNA matK
sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 925930.
Skipworth J. P. (1970) Development of floral
vasculature in the Magnoliaceae. Phytomorphol-
ogy 20: 228236.Skipworth J. P., Philipson W. R. (1966) The
cortical vascular system and the interpretation
of the Magnolia flower. Phytomorphology 16:
463469.
Skvortsova N. T. (1958) On the flower anatomy of
Magnolia grandiflora L. Bot. Zhurn. 43: 401
408. [in Russian]
Tucker S. (1960) Ontogeny of the floral apex of
Michelia fuscata. Amer. J. Bot. 47: 266277.
Tucker S. (1961) Phyllotaxis and vascular organi-zation of the carpels in Michelia fuscata. Amer.
J. Bot. 48: 6071.
Tucker S. (1979) Ontogeny of the inflorescence of
Saururus cernuus (Saururaceae). Amer. J. Bot.
66: 227236.
Ueda K. (1982) On the fundamental vascular
pattern in the flowers of the Magnoliales. Acta
Phytotax. Geobot. 33: 383391. [in Japanese]
Ueda K. (1986) Vascular systems in the Magnoli-
aceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 99: 333349.
Ueda K., Yamashita J., Tamura M. N. (2000)
Molecular phylogeny of the Magnoliaceae. In:Liu Y. H., Fan H. M., Chen Z. Y., Wu Q. G.,
Zeng Q. W. (eds.) Proceedings of the
international symposium of the family Magnoli-
aceae 205-209. Science Press, Beijing, China.
van Heel W. A. (1981) A SEM investigation on the
development of free carpels. Blumea 27: 499522.
van Heel W. A. (1983) The ascidiform early
development of free carpels, a SEM investiga-
tion. Blumea 28: 231270.
Addresses of the authors: Fengxia Xu (e-mail:
[email protected]), South China Botanical Garden,Academia Sinica, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Paula J. Rudall (e-mail: [email protected]),
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Richmond, Surrey,
TW9 3AB, UK.
F. Xu and P. J. Rudall: Floral morphology of Magnoliaceae 15
8/13/2019 Ontogenia flori la Fam. Magnoliaceae
16/16