IN RE:

UNITED STATES • :ISTRIGT COURT

MIDDLE DlSTRICT OF LOUJSIANA

·~ I ,,

REALLDTTMENT OF C IV! L CASES

GENERAL ORDER

NUMBER 00-4

ORDER

IT l S ORDERED th at "the cases on the attached list are here by reallotted from

SECTION B.of this Court to SECTION Dt and irom SECTION C of this Court to

SECTION D respectively:

Baton Rouge, Louisi6'na, June 13, 2000.

FRANK J. POLOZOLA, CHIEF JUDGE Ml ODLE DISTRICT OF ~OU ISIA:NA

~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SEC 10 ''B" RE-ALLOTTED TO SECTIO 'O

8 C

92c .,Jc · Scv CCV

9 c::v 96cv 9 CV 96cv 7cv

97cv 97c:.

7cv 97c 97C"I 1c 7cv 7cv

r..7 .v 7cv

97cv 99cv 98cv

Be 98c 98cv

CV

Bev 98cv

Elev 9Bcv 99cv 98cv

Be 98c

9c Sc:

98cv Be Bev

Cl 98c

001""'" 48

071 171) ooo; 0508 3281 3297 7 92 0065 01 7 019 0 92

1194 0019 0063 0148 0225 024 02 7

3 1 0 57 0 6 0311 0392 0 08 0~16 0430 0~4 6 04 94 05~8 0569 057"' 0 11 0 8] 0604 0 29 06 0 0 69 067 0 BJ

H ~1 :n, al St ie~re, e al

husLz , e al v. Sco cL v. Edmonds Wooley, e 1 v. Green, et al v. USA v. 4. 09 Ac Brown, et al v. Da nport v. Jewe 1 v.

ibe boar Co __ ) . Fi Pboard Co~p

R.J. yno s ~a ace

yrouse s Motors,

L and _n c

man Investments Long •1emorial

Highline v. J .Janu ac u.rln .~ Co B. S • -ndo C ali£:ed Co

. Rhodes C yo Ba- on Ro ge

F d r 1 i ona.l H.arley v~ Sou;:_par k eall , e . Scimed L.L Sys es

v . L'Lch .ield Landry, l v . Geo a Gu- £ Corp Jordan v. c· yo Ba o n ouge Garig v. J E Mer o n st ns Seamans v, Gie, e l Wyb_e 1

Blaloc, y 6 A Res a.urant: on

c e ci y arin. Daig e , Gu..'..dr y . Li con a 'onal Thompson v. BASP Cc· orth Arne ican Cons Genera_ Fi nanc

1 lmendares v. Smi h Singley Cons I.JC ion v. Exide Corpora-io n 1eyer v . LAH a I Se vices Al_ 0 n, e· a l v . Gul·co Fin~nce I n c Evans v. r ood:s

v. T ylo . 0 V S

asba __ ,

t~ilson v. Phi

d ~ar el Se

Co g r

SECTION 118 11 RE-ALLOTTED TO SECTION 1'0''

9Scv 0684 98cv 0691 9B cv 0693 .9 8 cv· 0702 98cv 0706 98cv 0719 98cv 0722 98c:v 0763 98cv 0S0 l 98 c.v 0864 98cv 0865 98cv 0890 98cv 0902 9Scv 0919 98cv 0945 98cv 9.46 98cv 0986 98cv 0998 98cv 1001 98cv .1013 98cv 1015 98cv 1021 9Bcv 1028 9Bcv 1051 98cv 1062 9Bcv 1135 9Bcv 113-7 98cv .1.1 38 98.cv 1139 98cv 1143 98cv .1144 98cv 114 7 99-cv 0005 99cv 000-6 99cv 0014 99cv 0022 99cv 0045 99cv 0058 99cv ·0077 99cv 009 1 99cv- 0 01 99cv 01 02 99cv 01 1 0 9 _. cv 0112 99cv 0119 99cv 0122

Dunbar, et al v. Popeyes Fried C icke Coleman v. Formosa "Plastics Triplett v. S alder Kn.i ghten v. City a Ba L..On Rouge rancis v. Motel 6

Hyundai Me chan v . Scar1et Crescen t Sea Bolda v. 8PSCO I nternat ional Swet and v. Chevron Products 1 Inc Whi ney ational v. S~mders Cha ela n v. J E Mer~t Const Ins Guillory v. Guidry CourViller ~ al v. USA La.sseigne 1 et al v . Hobby L• bby 1 Inc Joseph TD Bake v. K Mar- Corp Sylvan v. City of Por Allen Gaines , et ·al v. A.llstate n.s Co Boyd v. Ill~nois Cen~ al Orv~lle v. LA Casino Cruises Pike v . Home Depot USA, I C Ronald Davis Tr.uckin v. State of l.ouisiana Harris v Cain Amedisys , Inc v. Ce faratt i .Amed.isys , Inc v. mag-liane tti M rel · afava. v . American Gernn:al Ridgley v. Lovell Gi 1 , et a.l v. co- onial Pipeli ne Co Fraz i e r v . Col onial P~peline Ca Smit , et al v . Colonic;3l Pipeline Co McNabb , et ~l v . Colonial Pipeline Co Smith, et al v . Colonial Fipeline Co Hospitality I nter , et al v . Q Y Enterprises, Inc Hubba dr et a.l v. Harc:ros Chemi.cals Carmena , et al v. Georg~a-Pacific Corp Beasley v . Seariv~r Ms itime Carney~ et al v . Monumental Agency Collins, t al v. Levis Motors, I nc Kimbler et al v . Town of Slaughter 'inley Cons .. ruction v. River Valley Se rvice Woodfolk v-. Or:met .P r imary Alum Hornsby, et al v. Hornsby Maggio v. Ven rella Chapman v. Cargil Maine & Ter KC Offshore, LC v . Stor Gas Dubois v Pat Tankr I~c Gol l ey, e.t al v. "Bri,;1n Marri s l?ontiac Sims v. Exxon Company, USA

2

SECTIO "B" RE-ALLOTTED TO SEC ON "D"

99c 01 3 0 6 011 0179 0197 0199

9 ... cv 02 1,~ 9cv 02 15

99c:v 0218 • 0232

99c 99cv 9 C

9c 99cv 99c 99c · ., CV

99cv

0237 24

02 8 0265

0539 05 43

CV 05 4 9 CV 05 0

055 057 0513 0""'22 0 2 0 32

99cv O 3

q ii e lelso

ion ine Co

Express r c E>ol

lestic s Superv'

Cook 1 et v. E:ng• lio 1 et al

. h of Ascension Ph 11 Inc

C bell~ Smalley v . e •cCarncv~

!=!L al n.

Goodwin, Par~sh c -i:a che v Louisiana Heal h Se

11. Employer- s Mu u 1 v. Summit C• n s:ul ing ·ilson v. Po mosa sties McLin, ta v. W O Humph eys Dow Hydraca on v. I OCARD Hallid~y v . LAH lndem Ro ie . ta

Eun' v . Hood

Ferr .oa a Expre s - a treigh ·eat er, e a- v. Holley .ualif"ed Tans_ Way T~anspo~ta uie , et a l v. Pr rn r ca Life =ns

Rog il_io v. Ci y ~ SR Fire De Pugh v. Riv W s · , L . P. Cru.m v. Federal ·xpr ss Frazi~r v . Lou sian Lo ery Eroyl s , a v. ABC Broy es, et al Wes por s Co, e & Vin Chapman v. C onia Pipeli e

al Colonia' o

.... or

3

nc

n

SECTIO a~ RE-ALLOTTED O SECTIO "D"

99cv 99c 99c 99c~

9 ·v 99cv 99c

C

99c 99 99c•. 99c

9c 99c 9c

9 CV 99cv 99cv

CV

99cv 99cv 99cv 99cv 99cv 9 CV 99r::v

0 2 0102 0123 0735 0742 0141 0750 0756 0'7 3 07 5 077 0182 0186 0787 oeo OBO 0851 0856 0861 06611 086 0B74 087 0882

0 0 0 37 0947 0952 0974

001 1 012 1020 1021

028 1035

0 9 1055 0006 oo _ 0026

La ore . Seo sd 1 Co Per:i s, e- al

wigw . Gia! c:o PirrE= v. runer can •1anu ac ur_ erge on v. Ci yo B~to ouge

Morris v. Ba on Roug Credi Salee Medical v. anks on

g Cor

Hun er, e a v . B own fi ,,n11 iams: on Stoot~ t al v. Exxon Corp May ~iel v S 1 Louisiana S&B Engineer ad Co v. Rubicon, I c.

C .

Ci y 011.ce De e~ Phoe ix Jn- or

HebeTt v. 5 a e Fam M ual . _u Silas v. Easy Money o LA Jackso v. E·xon Company USA Hillen v. Zacha y Po ice Darvill e, et al v. A cension Schoo Emp Harris v. Exxon Comp~ny USA

owe v. Air Prod~c s Chem l Eh e

qui.pme Ren

.Jo ns·c n~ et. al 'ca Gen ral ~ ilson V. Ci y 0 Rouge

ringer v. s .. H l r:i.sh Hos

AlJere, e al v. . cs tHt.r:agen Fe Sewel v. Del a Air Lines, Inc Leger v. Canada L ' Insur Co James v. B inkerholm /i,_ultman, e 1 v. Hycl.rochem Indus t i Ra sey Henderson A ,ams . Gonz le Home eal h

v. Bro n

y So. Rl y

s edieal 1

" USA, I C

4

sEcTro N ''B" REPALLOTTED To SECTION "D"

OO cv 0027 OOcv 0028. OOcv 0034 OOcv 0042 OOcv 0043 OOcv 004-8 OOcv 0058 OOcv 0061. OOcv 00-63 OOc:v 0069 OOcv 0088 OOcv 0091 OOcv- 0099 OOcv 01 03 OOcv 0111 OOcv 0120 OOcv 0137 00cv 0 38 OOcv 0145 OOcv 0147 OOcv 0159 00cv 01 64 OOcv 0174 OOc,r 0"176 00cv 0182 DOcv 0183 OOcv 0193 OOcv 0197 OOcv • 2.03 DOcv 022l OOcv 0226 OOcv • 227 OOcit 0230 •Ocv 0234 OOcv 0236 OOcv 0242 OOcv 0244 ooc~,r 0250 OOcv 0256 OOcv 0251 OOcv 027 1 0Qcv 0274 00cv 027 OOcv 0278

Steward v . Chevron USA, I nc Ma gee v. FDIC LS Womack , I n c. v. Ge Rebycle , Inc . ll.guatica , Inc v . Kostmayer Cons L-r Johnson v. Schot t Bell v. Su ga r land Motor Co Allen , et al v. Foste RR Cassi dy Inc v . Svedal a Industri es Johnson v. Schott Ban ks 1 e t al v. Dunaway Chem Carriers LLC v . Cent o fa nt i 1ari n a Skinner v. J.C . Penney Co , Inc Lopl ccolo v. Brown Ge r ald v . C.obb I nvest:ment Co · ~rchiav~ , et a v. Barnett

ra aken v. Perfo rmance Con t r act F edeck, e al v David Mov~ng Co Inc House of Threads Inc v . Kost~ayer Constr Bosl ey v. Montg9mery Myer v. us Trust Cc of Cali f BR Oil and Chemical v. ExxonMobil Corp Thomas , et al v. Fina Oil Be geron r e i3. l v . LIS Tr ust Co of Calif MEI Contracto r s v . Patrocon Engineering West Ameri can I ns v. Fisher- Price In Smal l r e al v. isher- Price I nc Taylor v . City of Denham Sps Loc ~l 100 Serv~ce v . e r ogr ess i ve Healthca Batiste v . Fina Oil Company Acosta, et al v. !?CS Nitrogen E'e r: t White v . Ente r gy Gul _ States Phillips , -e al v. Se.a river Mar i time Andrews v. The Me c ha t' s Comp Baz.i lle v .. Al b am.a r le Corp Pr o ·,dd ent Life - Ace v . Sha.rp l @s Burrel l v . Cajun Cl-ec ric Power ~'lilli ams v . Di sc-ount Au o Parts Plaquemi e Towing v . Tetra Technologi es Bosarge r et a l v . Cu prum Ar dr e al v . Spillman Smith v. La Dept of Public Sims , et al v . Ger ry Lane Adams v . City of Plaquemine Seago, e · al v . Bank One r r ust Co Na

5

SECTIO ~s~ RE~ . LOTTEO TO SECTIO D''

OOcv 027 Shockle:e, e Li~e OOcv 0293 Bellard v. -, ring 00 · , 029 G"bbs, et al. C pi al OOc:v 0298 Koenig, e l . Laverenz OOc:v 0308 Edwar ds , et al v, Mall 0 Louisiana OOcv 0309 Bu i;ns v. Un ir.oy 1 Ch m Co I n c OOcv 0320 Walls -;r. ~ye h Labs In.c OOcv 0335 Gaudet v . Wes n Co OOcv 033 Green, al v. Co 1 nergy Service OOcv 03 Jamison v. ge VL "7752 OOc r 034 Cajun Injec:t.or . Jl.lle ro Fine f"oo 5

OOcv 03 8 Bear on, et l v. ohnso & J n TI

OOc 0355 Oril . Ollr e Cai. .

OOcv 035 . Ca OOc 035 D C 001 -OOcv 3 5 Snearl 0 Por: OOcv 0366 Mulle_i.x ". Cain OOcv 0315 ·• · C v. St Hel a p sh Sh OOr::v 037 Smi h v. Fi lds OOr:::v 0 83 Hose v. Low Horn C n ers OOcv 0364 Ortigo V . Firs Al lma.I"ir: E'in OOcv 038 Lowry, . al v. Bl·ckw l

6

sEcTr o 'c•l RE-ALLOTTED, To SECT,oN ~o":

CA NO. 92·550-C MORRISON V. LENS,ING CA NO. 92-8 9-C HOLLIS C. STALDER C NO. 93-78'9-C BREAZEA1LE V. A ERICAN HEYER-SCHULATE CA 0. 93-910-C JOHNSON V. BLOOD CA 0. 94-729-C DICKERSO V. SHERIFF PITRE CA NO. 94-777-C POULLARD V. TURNER CA NO. 94~ 1663-C MOORE V. CARMEN CA NO. 96~105-C STATE OF LA. V. TEXACO{and ·cm,sold. actions) CA NO. 96-3214-C SOURCE PROD. V. AUZE E CA D_ 96-3282-C POPE V. UNIROYAL CHE . CA NO. 96-3332-C ZUNIGA V. GOUDEAU CA NO. 96m3430-C llVlNGSTON DOWNS V. JEFFERSON DOWNS(and consold.) CA NO. 96M7326-C CHEN V. ALBEMARBLE CORP. CA NO. 96-7470-C POISSO V. FORMOSA PLASTICS CA NO. 9'6-7500-C DrXON V , BLUE CROSS CA NO. '96-7511--C JOHNSO V. GULFCO FINA CE CA NO. 96w7595-C JEFFERSON V. SO. UNIVERSffY CA NO. 97-40 C HANKS V. SHORE OIL CA NO. 97163-C GAUTREAU V. EPA CA NO. 97-362-C VICTI M V GRAVES CA NO. 97-416~C FI LLASTRE V. JACO8$ ENG NEER.ING CA NO. 97-535-C SANDERS V. R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CA 0. 97-6,77 C SMITH V. BORDEN (and consolrd. acions) CA 0. 97-707~C ICHOLSO V. LEBLA C GA '0. 97-718~C LA1RD V. EXXON CA NO. 97A1083-C RUSTON V. CJTY OF DENHAM SPRINGS CA NO. 97 .. 1091-C EATE CORP V. LAMAR LIFE INS. CA NO. 97-1097-C HOUSTON V. ARGOSY GAMING CA NO. 97-1126-C DOW CHEM. CO. V. SCHLUMBERGER TECH. CA NO. 97-1138,.C RODRIGUE V. FISHER CA NO. 97-1156-C THOMAS V . LA. CASINO CA 0 . '97-1176-C SAMPS,QN V. STATE. 1OF LA. CA NO. 98-49-C BROCK V. LEVIS MOTORS CA NO. 98-123-C NA rL UNION V. CONS.QL. CAPlT AL CA NO. 98 124-C GALLON V. STATE Of LA. CA NO. 98~125-C GARAFOLA V. PAUL ReVERE UFE INS. CA 0. 98-250..C SI GLETO V. LU BER UTUAL CA NO. 98-259-C WILLIAMS V. CITY OF BATO ROUGE CA NO. 98-361 C ALBERTSON'S INC. V. FRANKS SERVICE CENTER