4
 1 www.geofem.com  Critical soil parameters Some critical soil parameters and appropriate analysis types for some typical geotechnical structures:  Application type  Analysis ty pe & constit utive model Some critical soil parameters Tips and pitfalls Embedded retaining wall deflection and structural forces  Usually plane strain, but 3D for c omplex geometries and corners. Axi-symmetric for vertical shafts. Drained analysis for design, or coupled consolidat ion to predict time-related values. Undrained analysis for short term in stiff clays. LEPP Mohr-Coulomb sufficiently accurate for design prediction of wall structural forces (bending moment, shear force, prop forces). Strain-dependent stiffness for accurate prediction of SLS wall deflections and structural forces. K  0  has a direct effect on the earth pressures on the wall. Shear strength φ or c u : even if the wall is not approaching failure, shear strengths are still important for prediction of limiting active and passive earth pressures. Permeability k  is important for accurate prediction of pore pressures when groundwater flow occurs. More sophisticated models than LEPP should improve predictions. Excavation- induced ground movements  Usually plane strain, but 3D for c omplex geometries and corners, and installation effects. Axi-symmetric for vertical shafts. Drained analysis (conservati ve), undrained analysis (short term in stiff clays) or coupled consolidat ion analysis to predict time-related ground movements. Strain-dependent stiffness needed for accurate prediction of settlement profile behind excavations and heave inside excavation. Stress and strain- dependant stiffness G 0  and G . For assessing building distortions, more accurate predictions can be achieved by modelling the weight and stiffness of the building, rather than assuming “greenfield” conditions, although complex geometries would require 3D analysis. Wall installation may also cause ground movements but analysis is complex. Tunnelling- induced ground movements  Plane strain for suitable geometries but cannot predict effect of advancing tunnel, also movements during unlined excavations will be over-predicted. 3D for complex geometries and interactions and for predicting effects of advancing tunnel, tunnel heading stability. Stiff clays: undrained analysis for short term, consolidation analysis for long- term post-construction settlement behaviour. Soft clays: consolidati on analysis. Granular soils: drained analysis. Strain-dependent stiffness needed for accurate prediction of settlement troughs over tunnels. Stress and strain- dependant stiffness G 0  and G . For assessing building distortions, more accurate predictions can be achieved by modelling the weight and stiffness of the building, rather than assuming “greenfield” conditions, although complex geometries would require 3D analysis. Heave in soft clay tunnels can be over-predict ed, cancelling out surface settlement s. In consolidation analyses, the drainage properties of the tunnel lining are important.

Op Critical Soil Parameters

  • Upload
    khamis

  • View
    223

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Op Critical Soil Parameters

Citation preview

  • 1

    w w w . g e o f e m . c o m

    Critical soil parameters

    Some critical soil parameters and appropriate analysis types for some typical geotechnical

    structures:

    Application type Analysis type & constitutive model Some critical soil parameters

    Tips and pitfalls

    Embedded

    retaining wall

    deflection and

    structural forces

    Usually plane strain, but 3D for complex

    geometries and corners. Axi-symmetric

    for vertical shafts.

    Drained analysis for design, or coupled

    consolidation to predict time-related

    values. Undrained analysis for short

    term in stiff clays.

    LEPP Mohr-Coulomb sufficiently accurate

    for design prediction of wall structural

    forces (bending moment, shear force,

    prop forces).

    Strain-dependent stiffness for accurate

    prediction of SLS wall deflections and

    structural forces.

    K0 has a direct effect on

    the earth pressures on

    the wall.

    Shear strength or cu:

    even if the wall is not

    approaching failure,

    shear strengths are still

    important for prediction

    of limiting active and

    passive earth pressures.

    Permeability k is

    important for accurate

    prediction of pore

    pressures when

    groundwater flow

    occurs.

    More sophisticated models than

    LEPP should improve predictions.

    Excavation-

    induced ground

    movements

    Usually plane strain, but 3D for complex

    geometries and corners, and installation

    effects. Axi-symmetric for vertical shafts.

    Drained analysis (conservative),

    undrained analysis (short term in stiff

    clays) or coupled consolidation analysis

    to predict time-related ground

    movements.

    Strain-dependent stiffness needed for

    accurate prediction of settlement profile

    behind excavations and heave inside

    excavation.

    Stress and strain-

    dependant stiffness G0

    and G.

    For assessing building distortions,

    more accurate predictions can be

    achieved by modelling the weight

    and stiffness of the building, rather

    than assuming greenfield

    conditions, although complex

    geometries would require 3D

    analysis.

    Wall installation may also cause

    ground movements but analysis is

    complex.

    Tunnelling-

    induced ground

    movements

    Plane strain for suitable geometries but

    cannot predict effect of advancing

    tunnel, also movements during unlined

    excavations will be over-predicted. 3D

    for complex geometries and interactions

    and for predicting effects of advancing

    tunnel, tunnel heading stability.

    Stiff clays: undrained analysis for short

    term, consolidation analysis for long-

    term post-construction settlement

    behaviour.

    Soft clays: consolidation analysis.

    Granular soils: drained analysis.

    Strain-dependent stiffness needed for

    accurate prediction of settlement

    troughs over tunnels.

    Stress and strain-

    dependant stiffness G0

    and G.

    For assessing building distortions,

    more accurate predictions can be

    achieved by modelling the weight

    and stiffness of the building, rather

    than assuming greenfield

    conditions, although complex

    geometries would require 3D

    analysis.

    Heave in soft clay tunnels can be

    over-predicted, cancelling out

    surface settlements.

    In consolidation analyses, the

    drainage properties of the tunnel

    lining are important.

  • 2

    w w w . g e o f e m . c o m

    Application type Analysis type & constitutive model Some critical soil parameters

    Tips and pitfalls

    Seepage into

    cofferdam

    Plane strain for rectangular, axi-

    symmetric for circular cofferdams.

    Steady-state seepage.

    Given the uncertainties in permeability

    measurement, linear anisotropic

    permeability is probably sufficiently

    accurate (as opposed to non-linear,

    dependent on void ratio or effective

    stress).

    Permeability k. Permeability is notoriously difficult

    to measure accurately, with values

    sometimes varying by orders of

    magnitude. This results in outputs

    of seepage from the analysis

    varying by orders of magnitude.

    Therefore, parametric studies to

    quantify the range of uncertainty in

    analysis outputs is essential.

    Cut slopes

    Plane strain.

    3D if structure such as abutment wall

    influences slope or for certain

    stabilisation measures or if 3D

    mechanism critical.

    Drained analysis is conservative for

    stability in stiff clays, undrained for

    short-term stability in stiff clay, or else

    coupled consolidation analysis of clay

    slopes to predict time-related swelling

    and delayed failure. In soft clays, short

    term (undrained) is usually critical for

    stability.

    LEPP Mohr-Coulomb for granular soils

    and stiff clays. Hyperbolic or Modified

    Cam Clay for normally to lightly over-

    consolidated clays to predict plastic

    straining pre-failure.

    Soil shear strength or

    cu.

    Permeability k for

    coupled consolidation

    analysis.

    Time to failure in clay

    slopes depends also on

    K0.

    Only use undrained analysis if clay

    is fully undrained. This will not be

    the case in clays with silt or sand

    layers.

    Specialised analysis is required to

    simulate softening and progressive

    failure of cut slopes in stiff plastic

    clays. In non-softening analyses,

    use c

  • 3

    w w w . g e o f e m . c o m

    Application type Analysis type & constitutive model Some critical soil parameters

    Tips and pitfalls

    Single pile

    (vertical load)

    Axi-symmetric.

    Undrained for pile resistance in clays.

    Drained for pile resistance in sands and

    for long term deformations.

    Consolidation analysis for time

    dependent deformations.

    LEPP Mohr-Coulomb for pile resistance

    (total stress analysis for undrained case)

    and settlement.

    Shear strength or cu.

    K0 for shaft friction.

    Dilation in a confined problem such

    as this causes unrealistic results

    and can even prevent failure.

    Always set = 0.

    The various installation methods of

    piles will affect soil and soil/pile

    interaction properties in different

    ways. For instance, void ratio

    changes will affect soil strength and

    stiffness.

    Single pile

    (lateral load)

    3D analysis.

    Undrained for lateral resistance in clays.

    Drained for lateral resistance in sands

    and for long term deformations.

    Consolidation analysis for time

    dependent deformations.

    LEPP Mohr-Coulomb for lateral

    resistance (total stress analysis for

    undrained case) and approximate

    deflection.

    Hyperbolic model for more accurate

    lateral deflection prediction.

    Shear strength and

    stiffness or cu, G.

    K0.

    The various installation methods of

    piles will affect soil and soil/pile

    interaction properties in different

    ways. For instance, void ratio

    changes will affect soil strength and

    stiffness.

    Pressuremeter testing is particularly

    suited to obtaining parameters for

    laterally-loaded piles due to its

    horizontal loading.

    Pile group

    3D analysis.

    Undrained for group resistance in clays.

    Drained for group resistance in sands

    and for long term deformations.

    Consolidation analysis for time-

    dependent deformations.

    LEPP Mohr-Coulomb for group resistance

    (total stress analysis for undrained case)

    and approximate settlement.

    Strain-dependent stiffness for accurate

    prediction of settlement and soil-pile

    interaction effects.

    Small-strain stiffness G0

    and G for interaction

    effects.

    Dilation in a confined problem such

    as this with vertical loads causes

    unrealistic results and can even

    prevent failure. Always set = 0.

    The various installation methods of

    piles will affect soil and soil/pile

    interaction properties in different

    ways. For instance, void ratio

    changes will affect soil strength and

    stiffness.

  • 4

    w w w . g e o f e m . c o m

    Application type Analysis type & constitutive model Some critical soil parameters

    Tips and pitfalls

    Shallow

    foundation

    Strip: plane strain.

    Circular: axi-symmetric.

    Pad: 3D

    Undrained for bearing resistance on

    clays.

    Drained for bearing resistance on sands

    and for long term deformations.

    Consolidation analysis for time-

    dependent deformations.

    LEPP Mohr-Coulomb for bearing

    resistance (total stress analysis for

    undrained case).

    Hyperbolic model (or Modified Cam Clay

    for soft clays) for bearing resistance and

    accurate settlement.

    Strain-dependent stiffness for accurate

    prediction of deformations adjacent to

    foundation.

    Stiffness G for

    deformations, shear

    strength or cu for

    failure.

    Anisotropic strength reduces

    bearing resistance. If using an

    isotropic model, an average shear

    strength must be determined.

    Dynamic analysis

    (low strain)

    Single source vibration (e.g. pile driving,

    machinery): axi-symmetric.

    Soil-structure interaction: plane strain or

    3D depending on geometry.

    Drained or undrained depending on rate

    of loading and soil type. Even sands

    might be treated as undrained under

    rapid loading.

    Constitutive model depends on structure

    being modelled and purpose of analysis

    (see application types above). Simple

    linear elastic model could be used for

    basic wave propagation studies, but the

    small-strain stiffness (G0) should be

    used. Strain-dependent stiffness could

    be used for higher strain levels. Note

    that for high strain dynamic studies,

    volume change characteristics under

    cyclic loading need to be considered.

    Small strain stiffness G0

    and decay of stiffness

    with strain.

    Damping ratio for soil-

    structure interaction

    problems.