Thomas Caggiano - Pro SeAuthor and partner in Publishing firm Inside on the OutsideFreedomNewsDigest.com Exposes corruption in government coast to coastOPINION Public record http://thomascaggiano.com/160627WANTAGE.pdf7086 Arcadia Glen CourtNorth Las Vegas, Nv 89084thomascaggiano@gmail.comhttp://thomascaggiano.com/background.pdf Acquisition Corps Level IIIphone 702-586-6768cell 973-945-0486Jun 27, 2016

Chancery Division - General Equity PartFile Clerk and Judge S. Hansbury, P.J. Ch CambersRe:Docket SSX-C-21-15Township of Wantage v. Thomas J. CaggianoSuperior Court of New JerseyMorris County CourthouseWashington and Court StreetsP.O. Box 910Morristown, N.J. 07963-0910

Weiner Lesniak LLPCorrupt Attorney for Township of Wantage (Sussex County)For the for Steven R. Tombalakin, Esq. and for firmRef:S-2003-083-1910, S-2003-084-1910, SSX-C-21-15, U.S. District Court District of New Jer-sey Docket 2:15-cv-08480-SDW-LDW [REMOVED] remanded by fraudhttp://thomascaggiano.com/USA.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/WETTRE.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/transcript.pdf Order transcript for Appellate Division Appeal629 Parsippany RoadP.O. Box 0438Parsipanny, N.J. 07054-0438

Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA)United States Department of Justice Director Monty Wilkinson, Esq. and General Counsel Office (GCO) re: Organized Crime and Racketeering SectionPer direction of DOJ OIP staff and Public Integrity Section Case File DA30037340Jun 11, 2016 Appeal No. DOJ-AP-2016-003363 Req: 1281753 - corrupt Lynch and Comeyhttp://thomascaggiano.com/CIGIE.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/LYNCHUSPS.pdfhttp://FreedomNewsDigest.comhttp://thomascaggiano.com/AAG.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/PCU.pdfDocket 2:15-cv-08480 Township of Wantage v. Thomas CaggianoDocket 2:12-cv-01484 Thomas Caggiano v. Eric HolderDocket 2:09-mc-00228 Thomas Caggiano v. Eric Holder, Paul Fishman and DOJDocket 2:09-mc-00071 Thomas Caggiano v. Eric Holder and Mark J. KappelhoffDocket 2:09-mc-0003 Thomas Caggiano v. U.S. Attorney (PA) and EOUSA

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 2242Washington, DC 20530-0001

Corrupt FBI Special Agent in Charge Laura A. Bucheit, Esq.Per direction of Department of Justice Civil Division Criminal Unit, FBI Washington D.C., FBINewark, New Jersey with a corrupt FBI Public Access Line and many operatorsThomasCaggiano.com and FreedomNewsDigest.comhttp://thomascaggiano.com/NVattorneygeneral.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/USCOURTS.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/nevada1787 W Lake Mead Blvd Las Vegas, NV 89106

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairsand its Permanent Sub-committee on Investigations General Council Brian Callanan, Esq.Per direction of CIGIE administrator Brett Wilson340 Dirksen Senate Office BuildingWashington, DC, 20510

The Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE)Administrator Brett Wilsonhttp://thomascaggiano.com/CIGIE.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/CORRUPTFBI.pdfhttp:/thomascaggiano.com/FBI.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/FBI.jpghttp://thomascaggiano.com/TREASURY.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/USPS.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/CHRISTIE.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/corruption/1717 H Street, NW, Suite 825Washington, DC 20006

Acting New Jersey Attorney General Chris Porrino, Esq.Corrupt Gov Christie’s former Chief Counsel January 2014 through July 2015 and former cor-rupt Director of the Division of Law from February 2012 to January 2014http://thomascaggiano.com/Christie.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/NJLGS.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/LYNCH.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/140127scharwencl.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/140822odowd.pdfhttp://thomascaggiano.com/150504pressrelease.pdfhttp://www.state.nj.us/grc/decisions/pdf/2014-166.pdf Complaint 2014-166 Thomas Caggiano v.Office of Governorhttp://www.state.nj.us/grc/decisions/pdf/2014-263.pdf Complaint 2014-263 Thomas Caggiano v.Office of GovernorP.O. Box 080Trenton, N.J. 08625-0080Subject: A Manifesto - Request for Adjournment until Aug 10, 2016, Request of Court to ap-

prove my civil right of due process to submit a request for admissions, Common Law right of Ac-cess request, Press Enterprise II Information Request, and Discovery to others, such as, Bor-ough of Stanhope, Township of Green, Sussex County Sheriff, Board of Chosen Freeholders,Judge Gavan, J.M.C. Tania Ell, Court Administrator, corrupt Gov Christie, GRC voting members,FBI director Comey, U.S. Attorney Lynch, Glenn Grant, J.A.D., Harry Norton Jr., Caroline Re-cord, Bruce Sampson, GRC executive directors 2003 to present, Richard A. Stein, WilliamHinkes, Clifford Lundin, Richard A. Richman, William Haggerty, Director Division of Law, DirectorGAO FRAUD NET, all persons noted in the 53 exhibits submitted by the Plaintiff and in thetiered adopted referenced exhibits therein, Laddey, Clark and Ryan LLC, Dolan and Dolan PA,Court administrator in Borough of Hopatcong, Chief of Police Borough of Stanhope, municipalattorney for Borough of Stanhope, Borough of Sussex, Township of Fredon, Township of Hamp-ton, Borough of Andover, Frankford Township, Judge N. Peter Conforti, J.S.C., Sussex County,Mercer County and Morris County Prosecutor, Chief of Police Morristown, Court administratorMt. Olive, Newton, and Court Staff of Vicinage X Superior Courts including Trial Court adminis-trator, others defined in the FOIA response from the FBI FOIA once provided, Mayor of Town-ship o Stillwater, Mayor Borough of Stanhope, Director Division of Law, Senator Dean Heller,Congressman Garrett, Congressman Felinghausen, and Vicinage X Court staff, N. J. Treasurer,N.J. Comptroller, Mary Pawar, Kathryn Caggiano, Voting embers on GRC, and others denied onthomascaggiano.com/index.pdf a file provided the court, and Notice of Stay request to allow theMorris County Superior Court to produce the requested paid or transcript for an Appellate Divi-sion Appeal and serve as a n exhibit to file motions to the U.S. District Court District of New Jer-sey as a federal question to REMOVE the Docket SSX-C-21-15 from the State of New JerseySuperior Court as a federal question for immediate relief, my Objection to the proposed Jun 21,2016 Summary Motion Judgment and Jun 22, 2016 letter from the plaintiff with Rationale for myObjection and NOTICE of bad faith by the plaintiff with supporting exhibits and my demand for ajury trial pending the review of the Appellate Division and the U.S. District Court motions I intendto file.

1. ADJOURNMENT REQUEST and STAY pending Appellate Division Appeal: Please acceptthis letter and its exhibits to approve an adjournment for reasons stated herein,deny Plaintiff’smotion for summary judgment and deny the actions requested by the plaintiff in its Jun 22, 2016letter. The Jun 21, 2016 motion to the Court violates my rights to a requested jury trial whereinthe plaintiff and its witness can be questioned under oath and I can have up to 100 witnessesnoted in the 50 page compilation published by Inside on the Outside on http://freedomnewsdi-gest.com. The clerk is requested to stamp this document as filed and return in the enclosedself addressed stamped envelop.

2. The false statement of law and fact that the court has jurisdiction to remove my CommonLaw Rights of Access is incorrect as such rights are provided per the Constitution of the UntiedStates of America Amendments I and VII and the State Court is NOT a court of original juris-diction.

3. ANY ONE CAN SUBMIT AN OPRA REQUEST: As noted in a recent court case which con-firms the position of the Government Record Council, anyone can submit an OPRA requestNOT as stated by the plaintiff that ONLY a citizen of New Jersey can request a copy of a govern-ment record also violates federal commerce laws, interstate travel and so many laws and activityit is beyond absurd to make such a conclusion in my opinion and a recent cur case noted below.

4. Other Relevant materials: As noted in the letter from the Department of Justice’s Office of

Information, the DOJ confirms in the attached letter and that from the FBI that the FBI is pro-gressing on providing me not just the 1,336 pages of its relevant records but an additional 8 CDsof information which must be evaluated by me to determine additional witnesses, advise thecourt per its court order of Jun 1, 2016 of witnesses and facts known. Without these recordswhich are needed do to special circumstances to assure manifest justice and my due processrights are protected as I expect to engage in a very vigorous defense with possibly 100 wit-nesses that are fully aware of the totality of the circumstances and are government experts intheir fields. Whereas I am restricted in violation of my civil rights to obtain and review and activedefense with zeal or have a standby attorney advise me of additional rights and procedures thatmust be followed to obtain the FBI and federal officials as witnesses fro the State has no suchauthority to obtain these relevant witnesses testimony and / or leads to other relevant data andpersons currently unknown to me.

5. Whereas the GRC give unique authority by the State is the State’s expert witness onOPRA an d the issue who may obtain a government record via OPRA is answered on its publicweb site required by law. The GRC states directly: ANY one can submit an OPRA request.

6. Examples that such rights apply to everyone can be seen by considering the following exam-ples.

A. A person could be on a permanent permanent visa, pay taxes and have a State job andwould obviously NOT be a it en but to be able to live, enjoy life under the Constitution of NewJersey and Untied States of America MUST have access to government forms, official minutes,copies of deeds, et. al.

B. A person could have been born in New jersey and relocated to another State but would needa birth certificate or a death certificate of a loved of for estate purposes as such a situation oc-curs often.

C. A person is a citizen of Pennsylvania but is employed in New Jersey and it is obvious the per-son needs to know local municipal codes, state codes applicable to driving, and other daily regu-lations and as such MUST have access to government records eve through they are a non-citi-zens of NJ.

D. One could have gone to a stat university and needs forms to a college applications or workpermit or requires school records and as such having access civil rights is obvious.

E. A person could have a second home or apartment in New Jersey and must complete forms,et. al, or simply a business which is not a citizen with commercial operations in or through NJand need access to codes, rules, information and business needs if a partner, investor, bondholder in Government investments or pension funds.

F. A person who was jailed, but a non-citizen of New Jersey as an inmate to obtain copies oftheir own medical records or written grievances.

G. A person born in New Jersey that has relocated to become another citizen of a differentcounty that request a copy of their birth certificate, marriage license, device papers, prosecutorpapers if convicted or not, death certificate of related parties, drivers license, College o other ed-ucational records, student loan agreements, forms required to be completed by State, County

and municipal laws or other regulations,wetland permits, deeds, tax records, business licenses,judgments, pet licenses, tax codes, et. al.

7. RECENT COURT RULING: Below is the similar judgment of April 14, 2016 court order dock-et No. OCN-L-3295-15 noting OPRA rights CAN NOT be restricted to only those that are citi-zens per the statements made by the State of New Jersey Attorney General and the by State ofNew Jersey’s experts on the Government Record Council (GRC) any one an submit an OPRArequest including a newspaper reporter for example from any State or even foreign countryunder the Freedom of the Press unless restricted by some international treaty or executive orderof the President of the United State of America.

The court also noted that OPRA must be interpreted in favor of the public’s right to access.

As Judge Troncone further explained:

It is clear that taken to its logical conclusion, the position advanced by [the prosecutor's office]would leave many parties who have a legitimate need to access to public records without re-course. For example, a non-resident property owner and taxpayer could not obtain public re-cords affecting his property; the out-of-state motorist involved in an accident would be unable toaccess documents from law enforcement officials relating to the incident; and a newspaper, pub-lished in a neighboring state but circulated in New Jersey, investigating a claim of alleged officialmisconduct or corruption would be barred from obtaining public records. Clearly, all of these par-ties have a real and legitimate interest in obtaining those records but, under [the prosecutor's of-fice's] overly restrictive view of the reach of OPRA would be prevented from doing so. This

would clearly frustrate the intent and purpose of the statute.

8. Adjournment: As we have a preplanned paid trip from Jul 23, 2016 to Aug, 2016 to Europe,will not be contacting the Township by telephone, fax, mail or email his only give the Townshipmore time to evaluate the 93 communications which are NOT OPRA requests as OPRA re-quests when provided the township have the from and state if by email OPRA request to theTownship of Wantage in the subject line. As requested by the plaintiff they desire to knowthe names, locations and what possible witnesses know and as I communicate wit the Su-preme Court committees only then can I determine the person and I immediately to the best ofmy ability inform the Township of these persons as they request the listing and to my providingthem detailed Information they request is also absurd. An adjournment to respond more fully tothe Summary motion is requested until our return to the USA as we have for months booked the20 day cruise, obtained Paris museum passes and metro tickets. The DOJ OIP notes the FBIis processing 11 CDs of relevant evidence which i fact per the FBI letter 3 of the CDS with 1,336pages was agreed to be provided on Mar 26, 2015 and for over 1 year numerous letters to FBI,DOJ OIG, Public Corruption Unit, Assistant Attorney General Criminal Division and the NationalArchives has not as yet produced any record in our opinion and obvious adverse impact whichin some manner the FBI must admit even before an appeal can be made t the DOJ OIP. andSuperior Court has NO authority to obtain these vital records for my defense. which could identi-fy witness and what they know and be called as witness and I will file a motion upon receipt ofthe transcript to both the Appellate Division and also submit a motion to the US District Court forthe court was in error if there is bad faith new laws not only allow the case to be transferred to aU.S. District Court 1 year after the Superior Court case is filed but in essence if bad faith isshown as shown in the ANSWER, the time is even greater then 1 year. As such, I request aStay so I can make the appropriate motions and request an adjournment until Aug 10, 2016 togive the FBI time to process the 11 CDs and give me time to evaluate the materials since we willbe out of the country. I also note the plaintiff demanded discovery yet complaints when i providehim letters as to who are potential witnesses at my demanded jury trial, if my motion for sum-mary motion to dismiss with prejudice, as the corrupt Judge Hansbury, P.J. Ch should and mustdisqualify himself as I intend to subpoena him as a hostile witness as he has great backgroundknowledge of the corruption being corrupt himself on Docket SSX-C-1-13 Consolidated amongfive plaintiff and accomplices and what hey know to settle out of court as the Township refusesto comply with your Jun 1, 2016 court order to attempt to do so.

9. Other factors under the Freedom of The Press are NOTED and denial of Supreme court“Press Enterprise II” civl rights can not be vacated by any State of New Jersey Superior Court.As noted in the Jun 22, 2016 letter firm Steven R. Tombalakian, Esq. he objects to my letter forreconsideration and factors. I note his firm, Weiner Lesniak LLP, continues its bad faith by will-fully violating both OPRA as I have filed such a denial of access to the GRC the proper enforce-ment agency, has submitted a perjured statement f information under oath. It should also be no-ticed as a Publisher such requests fro information are also provided by Supreme Court case lawand a civl trail can’t not impact the force of either of the three civl rights noted herein: Press En-terprise II requests for information, OPRA requests for copies of government records nor Com-mon Law Rights of Aces which must be individually evaluated on a case by case basis and ifSTANDING exists as it does in my submittals, to prove otherwise, the custodian MUST PER-FORM a three prong analysis. It should be noted if the GRC continues to NOT place the compli-ant on its agenda I shall submit to the Superior Court a denial of Common Law Right of Accesswhich the Court will in my opinion find such willful denial for one has a civil right to obtain bills,contracts IMMEDIATELY and of course copies of one’s letters and emails which the plaintiff

seems to court which in fact are attempts to resolve with the Mayor and Governing body mygrievances for which the Township holds no hearing or any review nor response violating theirofficial duty flied with the municipality fro over 5 years it has failed to assign an alternative pros-ecutor, has ignored Common Law Rights of Access and have violated my State of NJ and Stateof Nv civil rights. After 5 years of attempting to get its corrupt court with Judges Craig U. Dana,J.M.C. and Glenn Gavan, J.M.C. to perform its duty I have filed complaints to the ACJC andOAE as noted in the exhibits. I again request Judge Hansbury, P.J. Ch to disqualify himself.As in fact based upon the 53 exhibits the plaintiff himself has filed with the Courts there is noneed for me to have discovery which the letter states denies me access to even submit discov-ery to the plaintiff without the court’s approval which is meritless. I have requested a civil jurytrial while this documents requests an adjournment if the court agrees with the Plaintiff that Imust get court’s approval to file discovery with the plaintiff then I would consider going straight totrial once the records are provided by the FBI and transcript as their is more then enough materi-als to cross examine any witness the plaintiff offers for under cross examination using the plain-tiffs own submittals the frauds committed by the plaintiff will be obvious and I demand any jurywould NOT make any finding for he plaintiff and on the court record. l so I can file an AppellateDivision appeal once the transcript already ordered is made available or file a motion for a feder-al equation as to how the court’s permission is required for a defendant to file discovery with theplaintiff let alone any of its accomplices for that is the very purpose of discovery.

10. GRC PRIOR DECISIONS EXPOSE DECADE OF CORRUPTION: The State of New Jerseyhas an totally corrupt agency that is suppose to assure transparency in government so the per-formance and efficiency of the government conduct and performance can be evaluated. That or-ganization is the totally infested Government Record Council (GRC) and wit the aide of the cor-rupt State of New Jersey’s Attorney General Department of Law and Public Safety’ Division ofLaw has conspired fro more then a decade to prepare false deceptive finings and uses the samewords to deny reconsideration requests. While the GRC has refused for years to allow on -linesubmission of requests to itself an its accomplice the office of Administrative Law (OAL) that re-ports directly to the Governor, one can use its built in search function to easily detect it is a rack-eteering government enterprise not to serve fro transparency but o the exact opposite protectthe government especially the totally corrupt Office of governor. Racketeering is defined as astructured enterprise such as the GRC that shows in a repeated pattern of conduct agreed uponcriminal conduct. If one files a GRC complaint vs the Governor, which is also a Common LawRight of Access, if one contacts Heather Taylor the record custodian you will find out she as nojob description and the policy of the Office of the gov is Common Law Rights of Access requestare ignored totally unless the requester files a Superior Court civil suit fro such denial. In fact noCity, County o municipal government ever did the required balancing tests fro if they have Stand-ing all OPRA restrictions are removed. The If one then put i a denial of access complaint, theGRC uses the statement they are NOT the office regarding record retention laws so in fact thegovernment ignores violations of the record retention law even if the attorneys admit they haveno records that must be retained and are destroyed to prevent detection and apprehension. TheOffice of Gov will then use the corrupt series of New Jersey Attorney General’s Director of Lawand Public Safety Division of Law attorneys to prepared untruthful, deceptive and in my casesperjured Statements of Information to the GRC composed of a corrupt chair who has recusedherself for yeas on my submissions and then write by a majority vote and you do NOT knowwhat members voters voted for what. Its a complete scam. So the evidence is immediately avail-able to anyone with internet access by using the links I have included in my requests and espe-

cially read the denial of my reconsideration request that are always denied with the same un-truthful words and referenced cases that do not apply to determine what I wrote.

Here is how easy it is to conduct your search.

The search function to review these prior relevant decisions of the corrupt GRC is onhttp://www.nj.gov/grc/decisions/search/index.shtml and the entry appears as

11. TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES use of corrupt unconstitutional court orders for retaliationand criminal coercion: by the ESTABLISHMENT to PROTECT the ESTABLISHMENT. COURTORDERS violate U.S. Constitution and NJ Constitution but the Attorneys on the GRC ignore theRules of professional conduct that requires the attorney to report the corrupt Judges to the Su-preme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC) and the attorneys to the corruptSupreme Court’s District Ethics Committees which then in my case conspire with the Office ofAttorney Ethics Deputy County Wide Coordinator William Ziff, Esq. and his investigator HarryNorton Jr., Woodland Park, NJ where the corrupt FBI field office is located in the same buildingas the Judiciary Branch has designed its Case law and Court rule system of its New Jersey caselaws to totally protect themselves and to operate with immunity by simply not having a DistrictEthics Committee nor the corrupt OAE assign a docket number for then their secret decision isnon-appealable even by the DRB or the OAE and in total secrecy the best world to be corrupt asthe judiciary designs with its Appellate court Case law not only to protect itself but its accompli-ces the States prosecutors by extending by case law not only their own protection but their staffand the prosecutor staffs even if the State prosecutor acts maliciously abolishing Tort Act viola-tions laws for surely emotional distress would result as well as OUTRAGE. the courts eve abol-ish tort Act Laws as civl cases can not be filed as one has the most corrupt Judiciary Branch inthe world in the infested State of NJ wherein laws are not enforced aka Bridgegate.

that operates in total secrecy with total immunity per rules the corrupt Appellate division crated.The loop hole the OAE uses is the District does NOT assign a docket number on more then 2dozen complaints I filed so when they dismiss the docketed complaint secret then no one canappeal their decision and no one can obtain a copy of the field complaint. However, some of mycomplaints to the corrupt ACJC which includes therein the conspiracy with dozens of attorneysas accomplices are published onhttp://thomascaggiano.com/corruptjudges/

After years of frustration I have stopped updating the directory for government at all levels asshown by them is totally corrupt coast to coast such as my 350 page filing wit the corrupt U.S..Court of Appeals for the 9th circuit published in summary onhttp://thomascaggiano.com/USCOURTS.pdf

The recent saga is the Docket SSX-C-21-15 Towsnhip of Wantage v. Thomas Caggiano law suitfled agaisnt me b the corrupt Towsnhip of Wantage, Sussex County, with its conspirators theBorough of Sussex and Towsnhip of Stillwater wit he corrupt judges Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. andJudge Glenn Gavan, J.M.C. who resigned from the Sussex County College trustee position aftera $52,000 Saiber Study made the determination he violated the Codes of Ethics as did anothertrustee who also resigned and Gavan, Esq. uses the facilities of Chosen Freeholders that con-spired previously with Judge Hansbury, P.J.Ch and the infested Towsnhip of Green which alsohad the corrupt Judge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. who conspired with the Borough of Stanhope. thecorrupt law firm controlling Sussex County is Laddey, Clark and Ryan LLC, Sparta, NJ with its accomplice the law firm of Dolan and DolanPA.

The court orders issued by Dana are of course not only known to the corrupt Department ofcommunity Affairs commissioners as they are the Governor’s key alley in protecting the corruptState, County and municipal government within the GRC from exposure of their corruption. TheGRC of course has never found the Office of Gov denied access and the from Deemed denial ofaccess is a joke for the GRC has made this into ONLY if you deny my interim orders as such areview can take over a year will I find you made a willful denial of access and even then underGRC 2006-02 Thomas Caggiano v. Borough of Stanhope wherein the GRC made an initial find-ing that four OPRA laws were violated, the Borough never responds fully to the interim order,and has the corrupt office of Administrative Law blame the requester even when to find the deni-al was willful. The GRC former corrupt executive director Starghill, Esq. even committed perjuryin the corrupt City of Trenton municipal court and I was fund guilty of harassment. I filed percourt rule R. 7:2-1 numerous probable cause affidavits in its corrupt court and was ordered Icould NOT even file more then I did agaisnt the other accomplices. No Probable Cause hearingwas conducted and affidavits signed under oath without an due process were all dismissed with-out a hearing. the City refused to produce a transcript which cost me over $1,000 as the totalfines and court costs were under $700. The Superior Court judge Ostrer, J.S.C. after I provided Ipaid the $1,000 then directed the City to prepare a transcription I visited the corrupt MercerCounty prosecutor three times giving them massive evidence of violations of State laws includ-ing the Open Public Meetings Act. The prosecutor wrote the court, Thomas Caggiano is notguilty. The superior Court judge ignored the finding of the Mercer County prosecutor so more vis-its and again the Mercer County Prosecutor wrote the court, I did not even submit the docu-ments the corrupt City used as evidence to the plaintiff I wrote then to the corrupt GRC votingmembers complaining about the false findings by the GRC executive director and he corrupt op-erations manager who thereafter retired in my initial 18 submittals that the GRC buried in the

corrupt Office of Administrative Law as the Docket number is a GRC docket but the state afterhaving a denial of access did occur instead of being the plaintiff in the OAL as it should madethe record requester either hire an attorney or act pro se and has o read OAL rules and spendmonths if Pro Se of tier time reading rules and being confronted by corrupt Office of Administra-tive Law judges who in reality are not in the judicial branch so when these attorneys always vio-lated the Codes of Ethics called Rules of Professional Conduct as Judges violated Cannons 1, 2and 3 and are protected by the ACJC that is immune called judicial cannons you get the sameresult; cover-up.

As stated by Judge Edward Gannon, J.S.C. to the New Jersey Herald why he did NOT submit acomplaint against his corrupt Assignment Judge he said: It would be a waste of his time. Thejudicial branch circles the wagons to protect the power structure and throws repeatedlytime and time again the Superior Court judge under the bus.

Simply conduct a GRC data base of its prior decisions: Search thomas Caggiano andread the complaints filed against the Borough of Stanhope, the Towsnhip of Green, the Sussexcounty Board of Chosen Freeholders and the pattern of a government enterprise in a repeatedpattern of conduct in a structured organization, the Government Record Council attorneys con-stantly violate not only rules of professional Conduct RPC .3.a and 8.3.b but 8.4 and N.J.S.A.2C:5-1.c Conduct designed to aid another in commission of a crime by N.J.S.A. 2C:21-2.1-2.1and 3.b offering false instruments for filing in a pattern of official misconduct N.J.S.A. 30-7.a toobstruct the administration of law and a government function N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1.a, to hinder ap-prehension or prosecution N.J.S.A. 2C:29-3.a(5), a(7), b(1), b(2) and b(3) in a conspiracyN.J.S.A. 5-2.b lead by the Gov of New Jersey Jon Corzine administration followed by the totallycorrupt Gov Christie, Esq. administration which Christie brought with him after the voters votedout of office the corrupt Gov Jon Corzine the totally corrupt former U.S. Attorney for the Districtof New Jersey being Christie who was voted out of Office as a member of the corrupt MorrisCounty Board of Freeholders in the corrupt Town of Morristown where the corrupt Vicinage XAssignment Judge and other Superior /court judges and corrupt Morris County Prosecutor is lo-cated. , his Lt Gov and Secretary of State Kim Guadagno, Esq. his corrupt former first assistantprosecutor Stuart Rabner who became Gov Jon Corzine’s corrupt Chief Counsel, then NJ Attor-ney General and then New Jersey’s corrupt Chief Justice given tenure after Senator Codey whohad requested an investigation was thrown out of the Office as Senate President in a HudsonRiver democratic coupe by Senator Sweeney as again the corrupt former corrupt Speaker ofthe Assembly was replaced by another Hudson River Democrat as the Senate and Assemblyleadership as well as those State attorneys on the Judiciary Committee confirm corrupt ActingAttorney General Robert Lougy for a judgeship as the former corrupt Acting Attorney GeneralJohn Jay Hoffman, e/sq. was never submitted for confirmation, but of course US. Attorney Chris-tie and his accomplice for the corrupt U.S. Attorney District of NJ Jeff Chiesa, Esq. was madeChief Counsel, became NJ corrupt Attorney general following the corrupt Paula Dow the EssexCounty prosecutor of a corrupt County and like Susan Bass Levin, Esq. who was Jon Corzine’scampaign manager and then the corrupt Commissioner of Community Affairs with her accom-plice as a Deputy and Assistant Acting Commissioner Richman after a decade of corruption hasbecome the Commissioner of Community Affairs so he and Christie other campaign fund raiseron the GRC and other cabinet officials control the infested Government Record Council. SusanBass Levin, Esq. like Paul Dow, Esq. of course were placed by the Gov of New Jersey into totalpatronage jobs in the corrupt pork barrel run by the Governor of NY and NJ called the Port Au-thority of NJ ( http://thomascaggiano.com/PORTNYNJ.pdf) where governors of NJ place there allies and of

course being NJ Attorney Generals loyal to Christie NO person is indicted on Bridgegate for asstated by Gov Jon Corzine NJ is morally and fiscally broke ( as it has 8 bond downgrades in arow and does not fund its pension funds to balance its phony budget ever increasing its un-funded liability) as Susan Bass Levin,Esq. who was not eligible for medial benefits from theState eve having been given a $250,00 job in the Port Authority of NY and NJ was also given apart time job on the corrupt Local Government Services Local Finance Board so she could intwo years in the part time meeting increase the retirement pay by $12,00 per year but becomeeligible for medical benefits and quit the Local Finance Board job the day she became eligible.That is how New Jersey operates, you protect our corrupt municipalities such as the racketeer-ing enterprises in Sussex County and we will get the corrupt Sussex County Board of ChosenFreeholders members positions such as the corrupt Chair Hal Wirths as Commissioner of Laborand Assemblyman Parker Space and give them judgeships to with the local or corrupt countyprosecutor protect our corruption and we will protect yours. That is how as stated by the FBISpecial Agent in Newark defines New Jersey as the most corrupt State in the Unfed States ofAmerica now protected by the new corrupt U.S. Attorney for District of New Jersey Paul Fish-man, Esq., the FBI director Comey, Esq. and the latest corrupt U.S. Attorney for Obama’s Lynchwho replaced the corrupt U.S. Attorney Eric Holder

a. http://thomascaggiano.com/LYNCH.pdfb. http://thomascaggiano.com/LYNCHUSPS.pdf

What are some of the useless Title 2C criminal codes NOT enforced by State attorney generalsread http://thomascaggiano.com./index.pdf a 170 page summary report with directories: corrup-tion, corruptjduges, transcripts, pdf, COURT and the State of Nevada is just as corrupt as canbe read on files on http://thomascaggiano.com/nevada of as known by WE THE PEOPLE THEESTABLISHMENT controls the corruption as can be seen in Europe the corruption and dictatorof the European Union elite is under attack by the people they suppress by coercion of loanscontrol countries and suppress them while the top 0.15 lobbyist control Congress and payspeech fees even to Congressional staffers putting their bills into must pass legislation such asthe separate pork barrel line item the military construction programs which are separated by po-litical design from the overall defense budget a completely over blown budget which a dozenagencies essentially performing the same task for no Congressman wants their “money base”in their Congressional District closed and the Congress of course won’t even have a militarybase closing commission funded for these World war II relics are was waste of Billions but itfunding their district jobs and they do now not want to be voted out of office so the World War IIuseless infrastructure not only in USA but funded by the U.S. Tax payer in bases around theworld so those politicians can keep their jobs as USA tax payer expense.

N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2.g in a continuing conspiracy for more then 12 years N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2.b asshown in the 50 page compilation available on Inside on the Outside’s press reports

FreedomNewsDigest.com

For as shown the State of Nevada Attorney General instantly submitted her letter published onhttp;//thomascaggiano.com/NVattorneygeneral.pdf noting court orders violated that the GRCsupports on its web site as a reason NOT to find a denial of access such as Complaint 18U.S.C. § 241 and § 242 which can have life or death sentences

Examples of just a handful of the more then 100 denials of access submitted by Thomas Cag-giano for which no hearing was conducted by the Government Record Council, as show theGRC just keeps reappearing the same cut and paste court cases which in fact have no bearingon the case a such just by cutting and pasting the court cases, NO OPRA custodian can beshown they have a willful denial of access as all they have to say is while I was grossly negligentand I was informed by the GRC that OPRA request was valid I forget the prior GRC decision SoOPRA custodians just be smart enough to cut and paste what cases the Office of Gov cites for ifits stated by the Office of Gov and his attorneys that advise him from the Division of Law thatthe cases do apply how can I possibly be found guilty of a willful denial of access as I am onlyfollowing the position confirmed by the GRC. That is how useless the OPRA is and how the cor-rupt the Office of gov - Division of Law - GRC triad system operates. if you can tell who actuallyvoted and how they voted from reading the final decisions you can not.

a. Mar 27, 2012 Thomas Caggiano v. Borough of Stanhope GRC 2012-25

b. Oct 26, 2010 Thomas Caggiano v. Borough of Stanhope 2010-132 and 133

.

c. Jan 28, 2014 Thomas Caggiano v. Township of Green GRC 2012-252

b. c. Thomas Caggiano v. Sussex County Prosecutor’s Office GRC 2010-211

.

d. Thomas Caggiano v. Board of Chosen Freeholders GRC 2014-374

e. Thomas Caggiano v. Office of Governor GRC 2014-166

f. Thomas Caggiano v. Township of Green GRC 2014-418

.g Thomas Caggiano v. Mt. Olive GRC 2012-250

g. Thomas Caggiano v. Office of Governor GRC 2014-272

h. Thomas Caggiano v. Office of Gov GRC 2014-166

Common Law Rights of Access are completely ignored by the Office of Gov until the reques-ter files a law suit for violations of Common Law rights of Access and perform NO balancing testas required to deny such a civl right

Today through out the U.S.A., The Establishment’s partisan politics has polarized the USAacross party lines which the We the People’s disgust I expect to have a greater turn-out in a pro-test vote for the Libertarian Party or do not vote. Based upon Thomas Caggiano’s extensive 30year career noted on http://thomascaggiano.com/backgriound.pdf and simple acknowledg-ment of the Presidential Executive Orders signed by President Obama and President Clintonpublished on http://thomascaggano.com/NATIONALSECURITY.pdf that define a felony isthese classified areas as negligence NOT intent it is clear the State Department Kerry, his undersecretary for management Patrick Kennedy, the Diplomatic Security office, Democrats, mediaare protecting Hillary Clinton and he staff for eve though she was informed her Blackberry wasunsecured, informed to use a .gov email account like the former Secretaries of State she re-fused and also refused with he staff to discuss her ever wit the State Department Office of In-spector Generals investigators but the prior Secretaries of State cooperated as her web sitehttps://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2015/07/13/email-facts/ is full with un-truths and as an attorney giving such statements to third parties is itself a violation of Codes ofEthics for attorneys called Rules of Professional Conduct R. 4.1

In a continuing conspiracy noted by federal senators, members of Congress, state senators, pri-or members of the assembly, court staff, Office of Governor staff, Land Use Board members, En-vironmental Commission members, Town administrator, Municipal clerk, Code Enforcement Offi-cial Arlene Fisher, Petitions signed by more then a dozen property owners as the court demandthat I must seek court approval for each of these many potential witnesses including per WeinerLesniak LLP the plaintiff itself is abusive in my opinion as the long list of potential witnesseshas been known to the court by over one foot of filed papers alone b the Plaintiff by referencingas justification dozens of court cases for which I was found NOT guilty, had criminal charges dis-missed with prejudice agaisnt the State, have Judge N. Peter Conforti, J.S.C. court rulings thatJudge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. constantly violated court rules, had all fines returned and all proba-tion vacated shows the extent of the continued abuse of court process by this very action for tosimply provide me the small amount of records I requested under OPRA is at least 30 timesless then already provided the court by the plaintiff in its filings and the costs of the attorney inthis frivolous case field to obstruct the administration of law and prevent its detection and appre-hension by filing false documents wit they intent to violate my civl rights by public officials in awillful pattern of agreed upon criminal conduct in a structured government enterprise called rack-eteering.

to deny me access to records that New Jersey courts have stated search is NOT research andsuch records as bills and contracts are to be immediately available is only done in my opinion toprevent its own detection of criminal conduct in a continuing consspiracy since the initial over fill-ing of the Project, Minor subdivision, Block 10902 when as noted in the Department of Commun-ity Affairs investigation report by Codes and Standards, as stated by the investigator JohnMaher as I reported the official corruption to the Department of Community Affairs Commis-sioner Susan Bass Levin, Esq. who leads the Government Record Counsel as her Deputy Com-missioner Charles A. Richman then is now the Commissioner of Community Affairs and is a vot-ing member of he corrupt GRC that has not held one hearing on any of the more then 100 deni-als of access nor in camera review submitted by Mary Pawar, 12 East Drive, Stanhope, NJ 0874a witness with her husband Iqbal Pawar as they signed numerous petitions, were threatened

with law suits for filing complaints against the corrupt bribed not on contract for over 20 yeas norhis employee the Borough of Stanhope town planner Scarlett Doyle who with other PPs werereported to the corrupt Board of Professional Planners that ignored filings and took no testimonyof any witness in its cover-up of the fraud that continues for over a decade for as they say thecover-up is worse then the original criminal conduct as with accomplices the conspiracy that haslasted for over 14 years continues wit the latest filings by the Township of Wantage’s law firmWeiner Lesniak LLP. as false inspection reports were prepared continuously by him and otherprofessional engineers reported to the Board of Engineers as the State of New Jersey’s Depart-ment of Law and Public Safety’s Division of Consumer Affairs Board of Engineers’ Transcriptsobtain under OPRA have been adopted by reference for years and are published on http://tho-mascaggiano.com/transcripts/ with false and conflicting testimony before the Board of Engi-neers as the then Director Kimberly Rickets noted to the U.S. Attorney District of New Jersey,State of New Jersey’s Attorney General’s Department of Law and Public Safety and State ofnew Jersey’s Department of Agriculture herself of the four complaints filed agaisnt these accom-plices as the corruption and cover-up continues with lack of candor to the tribunal as known bythe accomplices in the judiciary branch in Vicinage X noted in my complaint to the ACJC at-tached hereto as well as other pdf formatted responses from the office of Gov Special Councilshowing knowledge of the retaliation agaisnt informants published on http://thomascaggia-no.com/pdf/ directory as one of just many documents available on the adopted referenced pub-lic records on http://thomascaggiano.com/page033.htm

10 East Drive Stanhope, NJ 07874 May 6, 2006

Department of Community AffairsCommissioner Susan Bass LevinP. O. Box 800Trenton, NJ 08625-0800

Subject: Stanhope Construction Code Official Thomas Pershouse Lied to Department of CommunityAffairs Codes and Standards Investigator John Mayer and refused a request to stop work immediately byBorough Engineer that violations of law existed, allowed continued illegal development and adverseimpacts to the community to occur and Mr. Gerald Grayce refuses to reopen investigation

Dear Ms. Levin:

While I have no doubt my title is somewhat lengthy you don’t have to read the rest of this letter to understand thegravity of my May 5, 2006 telephone conversation with Mr. Grayce.

As Mr. Maher knew Mr. Pershouse was told by the Borough Engineer John Cilo Jr who has been under investiga-tion by the Board of Engineers and the evidence against him, the developers two professional engineers and plan-ner and the State’s Sussex County Soil Conservation District’s professional engineer have all been “referred” theU.S. Attorney’s Office, the Department of Criminal Justice and the Director or Agriculture by the Director of Con-sumer Affairs Ms. Kimberly Ricketts allowed the illegal constructionon Block 10902 Lot 10 and 12 to continue. Mr. Pershouse, the Town Administrator Teri Massood and Borough Attor-ney/Municipal Prosecutor Mr. Stein were all told on Jan 8, 2002 that wheel clearing devices/Stabilized accesspoints required on each lot were not constructed and therefore no vehicle was allowed to enter and leave the prop-erty as sediment would be tracked onto Oak Drive, was informeda required Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was not made which per Stanhope Code Chapter100-119 and the State Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Act and NJAC 2:90-1.14 was required toBe approved by Stanhope and certified by Sussex County Soil Conservation District before undertaking any devel-

opment or issuing any certificate of occupancies.

The Borough of Stanhope then ignored the municipal laws and State laws. Mr. Pershouse’s comment that to Mr.Maher that Mr. Pershouse ignored the Borough Engineer as it did not impact the house construction while the lawsto protect the citizens are willfully violated is accepted by your department? Thereafter, the Borough Engineer filedfalse inspection reports as violations of municipal code and the State Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Act wererampant without any authority for to the developer to do any construction.

The Borough of Stanhope Governing Body, Town Administrator, Code Enforcement Official, Chief of Police, ShadeTree Commission, Borough Engineer and Construction Code Official all collaborated in continuing the completely il-legal development, violated laws as every surrounding property owner petition the Town Council to comply with theLand Development laws, site plan and restore the trees. That petition is available at: http://www.thomascaggia-no.com/page400.htm along with requests for investigations and non-concurrence with plans by the Land Use Boardand the Stanhope Environmental Commission.

Mr. Pershouse is a voting member of the Land Use Board that voted for an investigation!

Mr. Pershouse and Mr. Cilo Jr. lied to Mr. Maher which Mr. Maher knew he was lied to as Mr. Maher remained in mysmall foyer as I told Mr. Grayce while 4 feet of evidence was on my dining room table in the next room. Mr. Maherheld the Stanhope Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the minor subdivision project Block 10902 Lot 10 and12 in his hand in my home that was signed by Mr. Cilo with over 20,000 sq ft disturbed and stated in agreementwith me that certification by the Sussex County Soil Conservation District was required before undertaking develop-ment and issuing a certificate of occupancy. In addition, the site plan showed the outside rear deck was to be builton the north side of the house and not the south side. Furthermore a retaining wall in proximity to another adjacentproperty that was located down hill. The property on 6 Oak Drive required large critical slope variances. During thedevelopment, the developer never installed required hay bales any sediment fences were buried and post crushedfor months as Mr. Pershouse could see on any inspection visit that the stabilized access for entry and departure ofcement trucks and other trucks were not built as sediment was tracked onto Oak Drive continuously. Mr. Pershousethe member of the Land Use Board that approved Site Plans and Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plans and Mr.John Cilo allowed continuous illegal development. The Code Enforcement Official Ms. Arlene Fisher buried detailedcomplaint reports about destroyed Shade Trees. The Town Planner Ms. Doyle who works for John Cilo Jr. Associ-ates was repeated notified by e-mail of non-compliance, the Land Use Board, the Stanhope Environmental Com-mission and Town Council were complained to for months of criminal conduct. Mr. Stein as municipal prosecutorwas proved a CD full of letters, complaints of the illegal development and that we were victims and needed assis-tance.

The illegal development continued.

The Sussex County Soil Conservation District ignored our letters, some signed by nine people, ignored a letter fromthe Land Use Board for an investigation that Mr. Pershouse votes on and was briefed every two weeks for months.

Mr. Maher noted that the deck had no design plans. Mr. Grayce said DCA doesn’t look to see if they built things inthe right location as the door to get on the deck is on the wrong side of the house as the deck is on the wrong sideof the house?

His office received over one foot of e-mails.

Mr. Grayce says Tech Bulletin 88-6 (para 2) that states the proximate of the wall and threat to adjacent propertyowners and inhabitants is only required if the retaining wall is physically attached to the structure.I don’t see that requirement in the bulletin. Mr. Grayce and Mr. Maher were informed that boulders during the con-struction of the wall rolled down the steep slopes, into and though the non-disturbance area in the rear of the lotsand traveling onto 5 Valley Road though the hills and backyard and smashed into the fences over 40 ft inside theFleming’s property and the Fleming’s were so terrorized they wrote Stanhope they were afraid to have their grandchildren visit. Other property owner in my presence screamed at Town Councilman Murphy as he was standing ontop of the seven inches of sediment in their yard with boulders in the area. Mr. Murphy only admitted in a TownCouncil meeting after I told him I had three witnesses and in the Town Council minutes the Town Council doesn’tsay what the questions were. Mr. Wooton a voting member of the Town Council, the Mayor’s representative to theLand Use Board and a voting member of the Land Use Board wouldn’t even admit in the Town Council meeting he

held those positions? The Town Council member Diana Kuncken who is now our Mayor who lives directly acrossthe street from 3 and 5 Valley Road and can see the boulders on 5 Valley Road, the illegal wall and the deck builton the wrong side of the house on 6 Oak Drive wouldn’t even admit she could see the wall and fence from her frontwindow? Needless to say the entire conversation of these corrupt officials is stricken from the written record. Thereason I bought more then 20 audio tapes those many years ago is I planned to put the audio files and text on theinternet so the entire world can see how totally corrupt Stanhope is and how a totally illegal development and twocertificates of occupancy can be issued illegally with all the surrounding property owners complaining for years andnot one single violations is issued.

Wetlands are buried on Lot 10 and SCSCD knows they are buried and that SCSCD never certified any work until 11months after it started. No violation issued? The so called certification was a false document. Had no walls shownand still had a tree shown with a protective fence? SCSCD’s manager’s job description requires her to review a siteplan. Ms. Straub refused to get one so when I delivered one and to obtain their photographs under OPRA SCSCDhad me convicted! When Mrs. Mary Pawar who assigned me contractually as an agent many years ago along withothers to help them prepared documents and OPRA requests was told she was a “shill” no to her but to me and theSCSCD’s district attorney Brian Smith subpoena her to court and when she wanted to testify the judge refuse her totestify. All you have to do to read the disgrace of SCSCD is read the minutes of the so called “appeal” they know ofwalls but there are no walls on there plan, they say the trees were destroyed before they go there which is true butwhy still show on their false plan that was never approved by Stanhope It is stamped NOT valid unless approved bythe municipality. Of course if they looked at the site plan SCSCD would see the trees that were to be protected waswhere the developer installed the ONLY access point on Lot 10 where it could not be. When I brought that issue up,SCSCD ignored it. There sediment barrier is at the buffer zone line on their certified plan, when I noted the areasbehind the fence. Which was being moved into the buffer area, their response is SCSCD doesn’t care? SCSCDdoes care if a plan is approved, it anything it is correct nor any letters they got from every property about adverseimpacts on their own property our their adjacent property and when you send SCSCD’s chairman Lundin and man-ager Straub evidence after evidence of letters and witnessed dated photographs of the victims in the photographsthey had me convicted in two courts for harassment with two protective orders issued and both judges refused meright to call any witnesses.

Stanhope denies Mrs. Pawar, Mrs. Caggiano and Mr. Caggiano copies of any and all documents concerning the il-legal development on Block 10902 Lot 10 and 12. The Land Use Board banned me from discussing the illegal de-velopment as I had a sinkhole develop in my front lawn, an the assigned agent for 5 other property owners undercontract which they have and refuse me to discuss the illegal development I see every day.

When you then complain at the public Town Council meeting, the Town Administrator sends police to you housewith letters you can’t contact the Borough Engineer. Well in the telephone call with Mr. Grayce and Mr. Maher that’sexactly what they instructed me to do and Stanhope’s response was to send Police banging on my front door atnight waking us from sleep terrorizing my wife.

As I continued to complain in public meetings about the illegal development which now has two illegally issued cer-tificates of occupancy issued, the Town Administrator wrote me a letter I was completely banned from Stanhope If Icontacted anyone in any manner, attended any public meetings, wrote any representative for any reason, came on-to Borough of Stanhope property for any reason I would be immediately escorted off the property and charged withcriminal trespass and I would be charge with criminal harassment if I attempted to contact anyone in any mannerwhatsoever. As I submitted an OPRA request to examine the records and wrote to GRC a complaint of denial of ac-cess, Stanhope’s response to the GRC was I was not allow on Borough of Stanhope property because I was a crim-inal?

The apparent criminals are the Town Council, Mayor, Borough Attorney, Land Use Board Attorney/Municipal Prose-cutor, Town Administrator, Land Use Board engineer (John Cilo Jr,), Chief of Police, Town Planner, ConstructionCode Official and Code Enforcement Official, E.N.F. Development Co. LLC, Franklin Dawalt Jr,, PE Wendell In-hoffer, PE Peter Schneider, PP Judith Keith and lots of State workers.

Mr. Maher knows he was doing an official investigation and knows he was lied to by the Construction Code Official,Borough Engineer and State’s SCSCD manager Winifred Straub and files there lies in a draw to CI-006-03, datedFebruary 26, 2003 as it shows work continued on the outside of the home after a full certificate of occupancy wasissued without conditions?

In Mr. Maher letter of Mar 4, 2003 his statement is;” This office cannot peruse an investigation into areas outsidethe jurisdiction of this office.” Well then what prevents your office from notifying the Department of Criminal Justiceand the Director of the Department of Agriculture like Director Ricketts did. WhatPrevents your department from following the example set by the Department of Consumer Affairs?

Maybe the State Government people should realize they know more about the laws than the layperson since wepay to train you and notify the other department so that they can do the investigation? I made iteasy for you. Just go to: http://members.aol.com/page100.htm and fill out the complaint for that’s what citizens assuppose to do. I doubt the New Jersey Constitution denies anyone in your department fromgoing outside its jurisdiction to report criminal conduct. I think the New Jersey Executive Branch needs a yearly re-fresher mandatory 15 minute training course in everyone job description on how to report criminal activity. Every ex-ecutive branch should have a standing operational procedure on how to handle the issues and not bury them insome report. At least send the box of email to a criminal investigator with a receipt and get the evidence out of yourbuilding if nothing else then to save file space!

It can’t get worse as we have complete tyranny in Stanhope and other then the excellent Department ofConsumer Affairs and General Record Council, the State Commission of Investigation, Office of Government Integ-rity, Sussex County Prosecutor’s Office, Department of Agriculture and Sussex County Soil Conservation District,Stillwater and Hopatcong courts are in need of an complete overhaul. Mr. Grayce’s final position as of yesterday isthe case is closed and will not be reopened.

Mr. Grayce position is when they examine a structure they don’t care if it’s built in the correct location. Mr. Graycedoesn’t care about deeds saying they are not State law, I suggest if he has a deed he read the and the “covenantas to grantor’s act” NJSA 46:4-6as it is obvious no of the lawyers to help the property owner’s on 2 Oak Drive and 6Oak Drive did their job as a condition of both deeds is an approved as-built drawing and compliance with the 18 ftnon-disturbance zone and neither homeowner has either requirement.

I guess the statement that the Construction Code Official doesn’t have to comply with laws and people can pick andchoose what laws they want to comply with they do. In Stanhope, it appears the only laws complied with are themraising our taxes so that they can continue to operate with our tax dollars their government of corruption and tyr-anny supported by other State government agencies.

If you print-out the pages on page400.htm get a big bottle of Tums first and sit down in a chair with armrest so youdon’t fall over.

When I called up a legal service county service person to find a lawyer yesterday, I started by saying: Stanhope iscorrupt. The legal referral person’s instant response was: We know !

So do the resident’s of Stanhope big surprise; they just don’t know how bad the State government is other thenUMDNJ of course. With the publishing on the internet, the whole English speaking world will know.

Sincerely,

Thomas Caggiano

and denial of my Constitutional Rights to a speedy trial as the infested Township has for over 5years denied me such rights and only prolonged the Tort Act violations by this latest court filingof falsehoods as for five additional years the Towsnhip has expended funds rather then conduct-ing a trail or changing venue to use tax payer funds simply to retaliate and be and accomplicegiving criminal aide to others to obstruct the administration of law and by public officials seek toremove my U.S. and State of New jersey civil rights by simply stating I am not a citizen of NewJersey! Since when does a defendant in its court have one’s’ due process rights eliminated be-cause they are a non-citizen the State as the State by its physical assaults by its State troopers,its false imprisonment wit bodily harm, defamation=, libel and slander even remove their civilrights to give the Sussex County Sheriff a Writ of Execution for a Sheriff’s sale or denied the civlright to request a copy of their own medical records when falsely imprisoned by Judge Craig U.

Dana, J.M.C. as admitted in court findings agreed with b the State. Only in the most corruptState in the U.S.A. as stated by an FBI agent in Newark, N.J could such blatant criminal con-duct more then decade long conspiracy even reach new heights of outrage in your face corrup-tion known to hundreds. as great emotional distress to myself and wife and great cost to the taxpayers as the municipal prosecutor twice to the Joint municipal court in the Towsnhip of Want-age to change venue as the Township has also willfully not assigned an alternative municipalprosecutor nor written the Assignment judge to change venue as such facts are known to hun-dreds of persons as potential witnesses as noted in my request for a transcriptpublished on http://thomascaggiano.com/COURT/transcript.pdf other witness with greatbackground knowledge include the Chief of Staff Alan Tennille for Congressman Hardy (NV),Staff members of Senator Harry Reid (NV) and Senator Dean Heller (NV) and communicationswith Congressman Scott Garrett’s staff (NJ) and Congressman Felinghausen’s (NJ) staff of fed-eral issues in their respective Congressional Districts as IOTO has spent many thousands ofdollars alone during the last 14 years on contracts for technical services for internet security,computer repairs, replacement of PC, upgrading virus and other software, printers, modems,ex-ternal drives, digital scanners and extensive certified and priority on mailings costs, ink and pa-per and reproduction costs alone. By stating only a citizen can request a government recordignores the Freedom of the Press to itself gather Information to inform the public of alleged offi-cial corruption which as been reported by dozens of persons and ways to improve design, lawsas done and continues with communications to all three branches of government in NJ and inthe Federal government from coast to coast. Such limitations to gather publicly available infor-mation s the OPRA provides such cost reimbursements as determined by law is a tort act viola-tions of outrage causing emotional distress to answer the motion which is meritless and frivolousdemanding Sanctions which I will submit such motions to the court or which the court can initiateon its own initiatives as motions for Sanctions shall be made upon the receipt of the FBI relevantmaterials agaisnt the law firm Weiner Lesniak LLP. has now published under FreedomNewsDi-gest.com a 50 page compilation of over 100 witnesses and what they are aware from 2003 to2016 that is relevant and a complete copy has been now submitted to the OAE to support mycomplaint against Dolan and Dolan PA and Weiner Lesniak LLC as known by the Township andall the leadership of the State of New Jersey Senate and General Assembly.

10. OTHER FACTORS:. As I have filed a complaint to the ACJC agaisnt 5 judges in Vicinage Xand with the OAE against Weiner Lesnaik LLP and Dolan and Dolan PA as bad faith has beenconstant for over 5 years by the Township of Wantage and its court has violated my due proc-ess rights by ignoring motions, and not providing me copies of my own court records whichwould be used as exhibits in motions to the Superior Court and others.

11. I plead the court do to the circumstances completely out of my control, as the U.S.Government has via its Department of State advised me from the Legal Office of the U.S. De-partment of State of the Supremacy Clause and per United States ex rel. Touchy v. Ragen 340U.S. 46 (1951) I must follow other procedures in 22 C.F.R. Part 172 which was not obvious inState of New Jersey Pro Se Pro Se packages nor in U.S. District Local Court rules an adjourn-ment is required as the FBI ash been processing relevant data for over a year and in violation ofFederal law did NOT provide me an estimated completion date. At the direction of the Depart-ment of Justice’s Office of Information Policy (OIP), I have contacted the U.S. DOJ Office of U.S.Attorneys as the OIP staff could not answer a policy question on their standard letter how to ob-tain from the FBI an affidavit that I have been adversely impacted by the FBI not complying withFOIA prior to submitting an OIP appeal. So I called the IOP Staff assistant for a response and

called the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA) Chief Counsel at the direction of OIP. Ihave contacted two county legal referral services in NJ and so far the attorneys have rejectedprofessional service even previously when I offered a retainer of $100,000 to a large law firm inMorristown as their partner said then I was way above their knowledge as I already have beento the U.S. Court of Appeals for 9th Circuit and 5 times to different U.S. District Courts attemptingto have the U.S. Attorney and other federal agencies to perform their official duty regarding con-ducting an investigation. I therefore do have standing as noted herein and upon our return froma month trip to reduce emotional distress as the direction of my doctor and my wife’s have in factbooked three trips to Europe during the remainder of this year as I await the FBI to complete itsprocessing of 11 CDs of relevant evidence discussed below and await the transcript record forfilings with the Appellate Division noted above while the unethical attorney Tombalakian, Esq.essentially dismisses the civil rights for a defendant to obtain records and seek adjournments forreason to prevent manifest injustice to prevent me from obtaining my own Office of MunicipalProsecutors records and records he himself has identified to the court yet provides No proof oftheir existence which I object to them being offered by simply implying some number of recordsexists without their entry to the Court as an index of such records would aide in comprehensionand considered as evidence and strike the record as mere hearsay UNLESS the plaintiff pro-vides a copy to the court and myself, the defendant, for one can not even consider such a state-ment a foundation of its claims without provided all the documents it states it possesses yet failsto enter into the court record content and has under a statement of information to the Govern-ment Records falsely State are NOT government records. The untruthfulness an lack of candorto the enforcement agency is willful and blatant. Per his statement a defendant must get appro-val of the court before the defendant can issue a discovery request to the plaintiff which is ab-surd and causes emotional distress as a basis of the plaintiff to suggest the jury trial I requestedis not because the plaintiff would refuse to accept a due process documents which all defend-ants should exercise.

12. TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE: See http://thomascaggiano.com/STANDING.pdf which in factstarts with false statements by the 9th Circuit U.S. District District of Nevada. District magistrateJudge Foley Jr. as noted in my 350 page filing with the Chief Judge Sydney Thomas for the 9th

Circuit as published on http://thomascaggiano.com/USCOURTS.pdf which includes my com-plaint agaisnt Judge S. Hansbury, P.J. Ch to the ACJC that has protected him. I have now filedto the ACJC a complaint against 5 Judges in Vicinage X for violation of Cannons 1, 2 and 3 andhave useless reported their criminal conduct to local police, county prosecutors, New Jersey At-torney General, NJ legislators, FBI, US Attorney Lynch and the US Senate’s and House of Rep-rehensive’s Homeland Security and Over sight Committees as well as he Democratic and GOPorganizations all composing THE ESTABLISHMENT including the media which is a propagandatool thereof.

13. TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE The issue of a publisher was a citizen was not even an issue forunder the Freedom of the Press such an entity by Press Enterprise II has a U.S. Constitutionalright to seek Information NOT just records. One of the purposes of the requests also in submit-ting OPRA for Contracts and bills is to determine if the Trial Court attorney can never representthe municipal clerk as a record custodian as some in a recently filed false statement of Informa-tion not signed by the record custodian but the Trial Court attorney as a record custodian as theGRC has made findings a municipal clerk can NOT use any delay in responding to an OPRA re-quest by citing a review by a municipal attorney. Furthermore to determine if the Township hiredfor professional services Steven R. Tombalakian, Esq. who is designated as the Trial attorneyhas such official duties to represent himself as the record custodian to the Government Record

Council and the Township as he states and to evaluate if the Township has executed a properyearly contract or less time period as allowed by the law fro professional services with requirednewspaper announcement per the Local Public Contracts Law and review its planned budgetfor such legal services to determine is the attorney is representing himself to the court and theGovernment Record Council by fraud as appears to have been done in a perjured Statement ofInformation file by the Township NOT by the authorized acting municipal clerk but Steven R.Tombalakian, Esq. in violating of the ORDER by the GRC per OPRA to the GRC an enforce-ment agency and to determine if such fraud, the amount of funds in escrow accounts criminaldisbursements and if the budget has such authority known to the public for such services or arejournal vouchers being used to divert funds from other programs. I believe much more funds arebeing expended by the Township of Wantage in submitting the motion for summary judgmentthen it would cost the municipality to simply respond to my limited OPRA requests as the reim-bursement costs are specified in OPRA itself. This entire endeavor is simply done to prevent mefrom obtaining copies of the above relevant records for if responded by the Township OPRA re-quests would NOT even be submitted. As to the other emails and documents, the Township hasdemanded the records in its summons that is an abuse of process itself as it references manycases that are themselves obvious criminal Conduct which has been reported not only by me tothe enforcement authorities but in fact over two dozens persons many of them State and munici-pal official and employees as petitions signed by 15, 14 and 9 property owners are willfullyignored in a cover-up of fraud, deceit, retaliation noted in the official records now published onFreedomNewsDigest.com and have been provided the court in greater detail on the 170 pagesummary report with a CD with the audio recordings, and other relevant records in SSX-C-1-13consolidated which per the Towsnhip of Green’s own minutes stated the removed 3 boxes ofcourt records while the case was still ripe and then retroactively the court changed its court or-der, fined me thousands of dollars and stated if I did NOT pay by a given date I would have anarrest warrant issued against me. As the Borough of Stanhope police chief Pittigher in the pres-ence of the Town Administrator Richard Stewart who attempted to get me access to see whatthe corrupt Chief of Police Steven Pittigher was entering as quasi-criminal and criminal conductwas thereafter fired with severance pay and I was told I would be jailed immediately if I tried toenter the Borough of Stanhope municipal court to discuss anything with the court administrator,file any record, examine any court record, obtain any court form and as I was assaulted 3 timesby State Troopers known by the NJ Attorney Generals under Christie Christie each AttorneyGeneral is requested to be called as a witness as well as former U.S. Attorney Eric holder who Isued three times, such conduct for retaliation is common place in New Jersey apparently tocriminally coerce person performing their pubic duty in accordance with N.J.S.A. 2C:2-1 Crimeof Omission and 18 U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of Felony let alone Judges that violate Codes ofEthics Cannons 1, 2 and 3 and more then 100 attorneys including my own three being WalterRisi ( Dover), Carl Perrone (Morristown) and Robert Mattia (Newton). who will all be hostile wit-nesses as I expect to release my attorney client privilege for they have NOT reported judgesand attorneys per RPC 8.3.a and 8.3.b and violated the State and Federal criminal codes notedherein that violated more then 6 separate RPC codes such as truthfulness, candor, reportingother attorneys and judges, misconduct and filing meritless cases for profit as the attorneyshould have advised the Township you can NOT remove a person’s Common Law Rights of Ac-cess in a Superior Court in fact such a civl right is in the U.S. Constitution but such constitutionalrights n and laws matter not in Vicinage X as I have reported to the ACJC and the OAE and theOAC, et. al. as noted in my request for a transcript for an Appellate Division appeal. As such Irequest a stay so that after the transcript is provided, and after we return from our planned onemonth trip for rest as directed by my doctor for emotional stress relief for myself and my wife Ka-thryn, I will address the issues in both the Appellate Division and the U./s. District Courts. The in-

fested Towsnhip with its accomplices to include the Borough of Sussex and Township of Still-water and many other municipalities meritless and frivolous law suit in fact are malicious in anever increasing conspiracy for over 16 years as the property owners complained to the corruptBoard of adjustment in 2000.. Stating my OPRA requests are frivolous an do not support thevery purpose of OPRA t have the pubic review the performance of the government especially asI allege criminal conduct has been ongoing for five years, its a tort act of outrage and the moreoutrageous the statements are the more likely criminal conduct is being undertaken to preventall transparency for its prosecutor, its Township committee and its court know by the other mu-nicipalities, local police, county prosecutors and also the Supreme /court of New Jersey. Oneneed not explain the reason fro an OPRA request as it can be totally anonymous; however, toobtain one U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights under Common Law Rights of access one must proveStanding. This civil right is also a State of NV and a State of New Jersey Civil right NOT withinthe jurisdiction of a New Jersey Superior Court judge to vacate as down on SSX-C-1-13 Consoli-dated by Judge Hansbury, P.J. Ch/

14. Congress has passed a bi partisan bill to improve Public Access and strengthen OGIS whichdid mediate with the FBI on my behalf. The bill makes the following improvements:

15. TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE the ONLY reason I have submitted an OPRA request to the Town-ship of Wantage is the Joint municipal court has a ripe case in State v. Thomas Caggiano andonce the case was delay year s in violation of my U.S. and NJ Constitutional civl rights, de-manded a copy of the contracts for professional services to determine if they were awarded perthe Local Public Contracts law along with the escrow account and billings as it appears basedupon a conspiracy there is criminal disbursement of funds and the IRS Utah Office requiresproof of such expenditure to provide reward fees to those that report the alleged criminal dis-bursements as I have submitted such filings supported by massive evidence on multiple CDs .Furthermore, as I noted to the five IRS Special Agents I met in Las Vegas, Nv as shown on theFOIA response from the U.S. Treasury published on http://thomascaggiano.com/TREAS-URY.pdf and the U.S. Postmaster General Inspection Service regarding mail fraud, wire fraudand harassment by mail is also noted in the USPS FOIA response published and adopted byreference by Inside on the Outside onhttp://thomascaggiano.com/USPS.pdf. If criminal conduct is determined expenses cited astaxable deductions are NOT allowed as a deductible expenses which would mane the law firmsand Township are providing false audited reports and Judge Dana, JMC who retired many NOTbe eligible or his pension as he was corrupt in the Township of Green and the Township of Want-age municipal courts. The law firms filings for the State and Federal income taxes would also befalse submittals and ramifications are unknown to other defendants for in fact years for the pat-tern of conduct in a repeated pattern of agreed upon conduct is defined as racketeering andmore then 30 different types of civil cases can be brought to the U.S. District Court as has beennoted in thomascaggiano.com and its many linked pages. I have sought prosecutor records onmy own case which have been denied, my court records have been denied by the court, theTownship refuses to comply with the June 1, 2016 court order to attempt to resolve the caseOUT of court and submits falsehoods in bad faith to the press, the Government Record Councileven stating falsely the records the Plaintiff cites as evidence to the court when responding tothe Government Record Council Statement of Information denies access by stating the govern-ment records submitted to the Court are NOT government records.

16. Exhibits: Below is a listing of the attached exhibits supporting the request for adjournment,stay pending receipt of the transcript for filing an Appellate Division appeal and allow time to re-ceive and review the 11 CDs the FBI per the Department of Justice’s OIP confirms is in progressto allow additional witnesses to be determine that can aide in my vigorous zeal defense whichmay last in excess of 1 month do to the number of witnesses identified herein with the extensive

knowledge regarding the totality of circumstances, allow for the playing for the jury court videos,audio recordings an suing extensive computer assisted presentations for such multimedia ismuch more useful to a jury then a static transcript as a person can evaluate tone, delays in re-sponse, volume, eye contact, body language other intangible factors that a written transcript cannot provide which is why cell phone recordings nowadays are very useful which is why many po-lice department now have body camera and cameras within their police cars and counties use instore cameras by the millions as visualization aides; however, as they say, 1 photograph can beworth a thousand words so the below photograph image was taken by the alleged bribed Bor-ough Engineer for Stanhope John Cilo Jr.. AFTER 14 property owners signed a petition as notedin the official newspaper. John Cilo’s photograph was taken Jul 26, 2002 of a 150 ft long 10 fthigh rock wall with fence that exists on no State nor municipal approved drawing in the rear of2 and 6 Oak Drive, Minor Sub-division, State Department of Agriculture’s corrupt Sussex CountySoil Conservation District project SH#44, Stanhope, NJ 07874 that DOES NOT exist on anygovernment drawing nor contractor unapproved as-built drawing required in deed resolutions

http://thomascaggiano.com/deeds.pdf

Thanks to photography, some memories overstay their welcome.― Mokokoma Mokhonoana

17. TAKE FURTHER JUDICIAL NOTICE: note removal of my Common Law Rights is NOT with-

in the court’s jurisdiction and furthermore the statement that one must be a citizen of New Jer-sey obtain a copy of one own’s Office of prosecutor records when one is a defendant in a Stateof New Jersey Court is a tort Act Violation of Outrage and I have requested the Office of Attor-ney Ethics to take appropriate disciplinary actions as noted in the attached exhibits.

A. Jun 19, 2016 Press Release from publisher Inside on the Outside Cover sheet with internetlink to a 50 page Compilation exposing corruption published on http://freedomnewsdigestcom

B. Jun 11, 2016 Letter, U.S. Dept of Justice Office of Information Policy to Thomas Caggiano,Re: Appeal No. DOJ-AP-2016-003363 Req: 1281753-001 ( FBI FOIA response )

C. Feb 23, 2016 Letter, FBI, Washington D.C. to Thomas Caggiano, Re: FOIPA RequestNo.:1281763-001, Subject: CAGGIANO, THOMAS 11 CDs of evidence exposing conspiracyamong over 200 government officials, judges, attorneys, municipalities and other governmententerprises

D. June 13, 2016 Letter, Supreme Court of New Jersey Advisory Committee on Judicial Conductcomplaint agaisnt Vicinage X 2 Superior Court Judges and 3 Municipal Judges

E. June 6, 2016, Letter, Supreme Court of New Jersey District XB Ethics Committee for WestMorris and Sussex Counties, Complaint for Violation of Codes of Ethics R. 1:14 Rules of Profes-sional Conduct, agaisnt the law firm Weiner Lesnaik LLP and its attorney Steven R. Tomabala-kian, Esq. and Dolan and Dolan PA and its attorney William Haggerty, Esq.

F. Jun 26, 2016, Letter, Thomas Caggiano to Office of Attorney Ethics Deputy Statewide Coordi-nator Isabel K. Mc Ginty, Esq. Supplemental evidence included hard copy of the 50 page compi-lation of government records exposing massive corruption published via FreedomNewsDis-gest.com and ThomasCaggiano.com

G. U.S. District Court District of New Jersey Order, Docket 2:15-cv-08480-SDW-LDW Towsnhipof Wantage v. Thomas Caggiano [ Removed] Docket SSX-C-21-15 remanded by fraud and errorof U.S. District Court to the corrupt Sussex County / Morris County Superior Court, Civil PartGeneral Equity to the corrupt Judges. Hansbury, P.J. Ch Also TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE of fraudand unconstitutional court orders issued on Docket SSX-C-1-13 Consolidated five plaintiffs v.thomas Caggiano

18. Proof of Service: I certify that on Jul 27, 2016 I mailed by certified mail USPS trackingnumber 7013-2250-0001-5352-1735 with certified return receipt number 9590-9403-0696-5196-5333-92 the letter and exhibits noted in paragraph 17 to all parties and those mailed CFs.

19. Certification: I certify the foregoing statement made by me true. The statements are basedupon my personal knowledge and recorded on http://thomascaggiano.com and in filings withnumerous government agencies in the Present tense and therefore per federal rules of evidenceare evidence without my need to appear.

I am aware that if any of the foregoing statements made by me are willfully false that I amsubject to punishment.

Sincerely,

Thomas CaggianoJun 27, 2016

Thomas Caggiano Pro Se7086 Arcadia Glen CourtNorth Las Vegas, Nv 89084Jun 27, 2016

____________________________________________________________________Township of Wantage | SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

| CHANCERY DIVISION: SUSSEX COUNTYPlaintiff, | GENERAL EQUITY PART

v. | DOCKET NO. SSX-C-21-15|

Thomas Caggiano, | Civil Action|

Defendant | ORDER_______________________________|_____________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of a letter for adjournment withExhibits A-G by the defendant, Thomas Caggiano and the Court having determined that anorder is warranted; and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this ____ day of Jul, 2016;

ORDERED, as follows:

1. The Case is adjourned and stayed until Aug 10, 2016

2. The defendant shall coordinate with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Infor-mation Policy (OIP) regarding Appeal No.: DOJ-AP-003363 Request No. 1281753-001 and theU.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington D.C. 20535 toobtain records under his submitted Freedom of Information Request that the OIP has confirmedin its June 11, 2016 letter by Christina D. Troiani, Associate Chief for Sean O’Neill, Chief, Admin-istrative Appeals Staff a response that is in progress by the FBI to enable the defendant toobtain relevant materials and identify witness that may be favorable to his defense.

3. The Defendant shall advise this court by Aug 10, 2016 if a motion has been made tothe U.S. District Court District of New Jersey for a federal question of removal for his civl rightsby the proposed Summary Motion made by the Plaintiff on Jun 21, 2016 to this court to removethe defendant Common Law Rights of Access which the Defendant states are a U.S. Constitu-tional right under the VII Amendment and this court has no original jurisdiction regarding thematter nor the removal of his OPRA civl rights by the plaintiffs argument that since the defend-ant is NOT a citizen of New Jersey he nor any other non-citizen, even though they may be apermanent resident has no such civil right to obtain any government record from the State,County or any government body that falls under the auspices of OPRA.

____________________________

Rationale:

Whereas as shown by the Exhibits A - G, the defendant has sought records under theFOIA to the FBI which confirmed on March 20, 2015 it had initially identified 1,336 pages of re-cords on 3 CDs potentially responsive to his requested and has determined an additional 8CDs of such records may be responsive and is processing his request to prevent manifest injus-tice, the defendant is provided an adjournment to coordinate his activities t obtain and reviewsuch records.

Whereas the Court has been requested to remove his civil rights to submit an OPRA tobtain such items as Office of Municipal Prosecutor records, copies of his medical records fromthe Sussex County sheriff, obtain agenda of Open Public Meetings, forms for deeds filings, Po-lice records, Environmental Assessments, deed restrictions, tax records, pet licenses, andCommon Law right of access to other Township of Wantage based upon the fact that ThomasCaggiano is no longer a State of New Jersey Citizen but in fact was a NJ Citizen upon which theJoint municipal court for the Towsnhip of Wantage, Borough of Sussex and Towsnhip of Still-water has had a ripe case fro over 5 years and not provided Court documents to thomas Cag-giano’s judicial court record requests, not assigned an alternative municipal prosecutor no headany of his motions for a default nor summary judgment and he has ordered a transcript of theMay 31, 2016 teleconference and wherein he states this court has no jurisdiction to remove hisCommon Law Rights of Access under his U.S. Constitutional rights and error was made by theU.S. District Court as the defendant states bad faith was done b the Towsnhip and its trail attor-ney Weiner Lesniak LLP in filing untruths to this tribunal, the U./s. District court District of NewJersey and the Government /record Council by stating under oath the government records theplaintiff uses to support its memorandum are not government government records and for othermatters raised in his memorandum and exhibits and that per his doctors directions he and hiswife are leaving the County for rest to reduce emotional distress

And whereas the Defendant has provided the court the ORDER by the Superior Courtof New Jersey, Law Division, Docket No. OCN-L-3295-15 that found non-citizen of New Jerseyhave such OPRA rights

which is in agreement with the Government Record Council (GRC) position and whereas theOffice of Governor and New Jersey Attorney General have responded to the defendant’s OPRArequest without objecting that he is a non-citizen.

Now therefore, based upon the above factors, and special circumstances in the inter-est of justice, an adjournment and stay is hereby ordered.

____________________________________________________________________Township of Wantage | SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

| CHANCERY DIVISION: SUSSEX COUNTYPlaintiff, | GENERAL EQUITY PART

v. | DOCKET NO. SSX-C-21-15|

Thomas Caggiano, | Civil Action|

Defendant | EXHIBITS_______________________________|_____________________________________

A. Jun 19, 2016 Press Release from publisher Inside on the Outside Cover sheet with internetlink to a 50 page Compilation exposing corruption published on http://freedomnewsdigestcom

B. Jun 11, 2016 Letter, U.S. Dept of Justice Office of Information Policy to Thomas Caggiano,Re: Appeal No. DOJ-AP-2016-003363 Req: 1281753-001 ( FBI FOIA response )

C. Feb 23, 2016 Letter, FBI, Washington D.C. to Thomas Caggiano, Re: FOIPA RequestNo.:1281763-001, Subject: CAGGIANO, THOMAS 11 CDs of evidence exposing conspiracyamong over 200 government officials, judges, attorneys, municipalities and other governmententerprises

D. June 13, 2016 Letter, Supreme Court of New Jersey Advisory Committee on Judicial Conductcomplaint agaisnt Vicinage X 2 Superior Court Judges and 3 Municipal Judges

E. June 6, 2016, Letter, Supreme Court of New Jersey District XB Ethics Committee for WestMorris and Sussex Counties, Complaint for Violation of Codes of Ethics R. 1:14 Rules of Profes-sional Conduct, agaisnt the law firm Weiner Lesnaik LLP and its attorney Steven R. Tomabala-kian, Esq. and Dolan and Dolan PA and its attorney William Haggerty, Esq.

F. Jun 26, 2016, Letter, Thomas Caggiano to Office of Attorney Ethics Deputy Statewide Coordi-nator Isabel K. Mc Ginty, Esq. Supplemental evidence included hard copy of the 50 page compi-lation of government records exposing massive corruption published via FreedomNewsDis-gest.com and ThomasCaggiano.com Township of Green, et al. v. Thomas Caggiano