4
Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1 with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magne

Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1 with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1 with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet. Optimal 3.0 based Layout 2 with the modified bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet. ( 15mrad weaker than nominal bending angle ). Optimal 3.0-like Extraction Optics. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1    with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet

Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1 with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet.

Page 2: Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1    with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet

Optimal 3.0 based Layout 2 with the modified bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet. ( 15mrad weaker than nominal bending angle )

Page 3: Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1    with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet

Optimal 3.0-like Extraction Optics

Dispersion Matching and Phase advance between kickers were fixed.

but … The distance between bends should be extended by 3 m.The K-value of QP9X is too strong (~ 2.5 ).

Page 4: Optimal 3.0 based Layout 1    with normal bending angle of the existing ATF bending magnet

QD10 0.900QD10A 1.300QF9 0.450SF6 0.450QF9A 2.000QD8 1.700QF7 0.850B5 0.850QD6 2.000

QF5 0.450SF5 0.450QF5A 1.300QD4 0.450SD4 0.450QD4A 1.950B2 0.850QD2B 0.850B1 0.850

QF3 1.700QD2A 4.875SF1 0.450QF1 0.550SD0 0.450QD0

From Mover Requirement, s (Q&Q) > 0.60m, s (Q&B) > 0.75mFrom QBPM Requirement, s (Q&Q) > 0.50m, s (B&Q) > 0.83m, s (B&Q) > 0.77m s (SF1&QF1) > 0.60m, s (QF1&SD0) > 0.60m, s (SD0&QD0) > 0.65m