Upload
m-fiqih-hilman
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
1/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 1/12
Orbital Infection Imaging
Author: Claudia F E Kirsch, MD Chief Editor: James G Smirniotopoulos, MD more...
Updated: Oct 07, 2015
Overview
hen discussing orbital infections, understanding the clinical differences between
an ocular versus an orbital infection is important. [1, 2] The orbit includes the bone,periorbita, ocular muscles, retroseptal fat, and optic nerve and is consideredseparately from the globe. The globe is contained by the sclera and lies within the
fascial envelopeof the Tenon capsule. Orbital cellulitis, an orbital infection resultingfrom a sinus infection, is seen in the image below.
Axial computed tomography scan of orbital and facial cellulitis.
An ocular infection is defined as being limited to the globe or intraocular tissue.
Ocular disease, such as infectious scleritis, endophthalmitis, cytomegalovirus (CMV)retinitis, and syphilitic chorioretinitis, is typically diagnosed using direct
ophthalmologic examination. Radiographic evaluation using computed tomography(CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has limited usefulness in theassessment of these disease entities, although dedicated ophthalmic
ultrasonography may be a useful adjuvant.[3]
CT scanning and MRI may be helpful in distinguishing an endophthalmitis withlimited secondary extraocular inflammation from a true panophthalmitis withinfected orbital tissue. In addition, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MRI shows
utility in assessing the optic nerves for developing ischemia or infarction, which may
occur during orbital infections.[4, 5]
Classification of orbital infections
Although the orbital complications of sinus infections are usually classified as orbital
cellulitis, treatment of this disease requires a more complete description. [6] Chandler
et al defined the following categories of orbital infections (images of which are
presented below)[7] :
Inflammation with edemaOrbital cellulitis
Subperiosteal abscess (SPA)Orbital abscess
Cavernous sinus thrombosis
Coronal computed tomography scan in a pediatric patient with sinusitis as well as anorbital and subperiosteal abscess.
http://refimgshow%283%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1217858-overviewhttp://refimgshow%281%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1217858-overviewhttp://refimgshow%281%29/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/784888-overview7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 2/12
Axial computed tomography scan in a patient with an infection caused by Streptococcuspneumoniae and a superior orbital subperiosteal abscess that resulted in blindness.
Coronal computed tomography scan in a pediatric patient with sinusitis and orbitalabscess.
One of the most important clinical and radiographic questions regarding these
categories is whether the orbital infection is preseptal or postseptal.
See below for a series of CT scans and MRIs from a case.
Axial postcontrast CT sc an of a 56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection. Note theleft orbital proptosis there are both preseptal and postseptal inflammatory changes, withstranding of the left intraconal fat planes. In this patient, the diagnosis was mucormycosis andwas highly worrisome for angioinvasive spread to the cavernous sinus, which can lead tocavernous s inus thrombosis.
http://refimgshow%2817%29/http://refimgshow%284%29/http://refimgshow%285%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 3/12
Same patient as in the axial image (56-year-old woman with concern for mucormycosis)corresponding postcontrast coronal CT scan with findings worrisome for cavernous sinusthrombosis.
MRI (1.5 Tesla) of the same patient (56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection)obtained 2 days after a left orbital exenteration. Abnormal enhancement can be noted along thecourse of the cisternal segment of the left trigeminal nerve, associated with restricted diffusion,with increased fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal along the left lateral pons.Redemonstration of a left cavernous sinus thrombosis can be seen. The findings are worrisomefor continued angioinvasive spread of the mucormycosis into the left lateral pons.
MRI (1.5 Tesla) of the same patient (56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection)obtained 2 days after a left orbital exenteration. Abnormal enhancement can be seen along thecourse of the cisternal segment of the left trigeminal nerve, associated with restricted diffusion,with increased fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal along the left lateral pons.Redemonstration of a left cavernous sinus thrombosis can be seen. The findings are worrisomefor continued angioinvasive spread of the mucormycosis into the left lateral pons.
http://refimgshow%2820%29/http://refimgshow%2819%29/http://refimgshow%2818%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
4/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 4/12
MRI (1.5 Tesla) of the same patient (56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection)obtained 2 days after a left orbital exenteration. Abnormal enhancement can be seen along thecourse of the cisternal segment of the left trigeminal nerve, associated with restricted diffusion,with increased fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal along the left lateral pons.Redemonstration of a left cavernous sinus thrombosis can be seen. The findings are worrisomefor continued angioinvasive spread of the mucormycosis into the left lateral pons.
MRI (1.5 Tesla) of the same patient (56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection)obtained 1 week after the prior MRI continued abnormal enhancement is seen along the courseof the cisternal segment of the left trigeminal nerve, with progression of the associated restricteddiffusion, with increased fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal along the left lateralpons. Redemonstration of a left cavernous sinus thrombosis is seen. New abnormal foci ofrestricted diffusion are now noted along the left medial temporal lobe, which are worrisome forcontinued progression of disease and the development of new areas of ischemic change.
MRI (1.5 Tesla) of the same patient (56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection)obtained 1 week after the prior MRI continued abnormal enhancement is seen along the courseof the cisternal segment of the left trigeminal nerve, with progression of the associated restricteddiffusion, with increased fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal along the left lateralpons. Redemonstration of a left cavernous sinus thrombosis is seen. New abnormal foci ofrestricted diffusion are now noted along the left medial temporal lobe, which are worrisome forcontinued progression of disease and the development of new areas of ischemic change.
http://refimgshow%2823%29/http://refimgshow%2822%29/http://refimgshow%2821%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
5/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 5/12
MRI (1.5-Tesla) of the same patient (56-year-old woman with concern for orbital infection)obtained 1 week after the prior MRI continued abnormal enhancement is seen along the courseof the cisternal segment of the left trigeminal nerve, with progression of the associated restricteddiffusion, with increased fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal along the left lateralpons. Redemonstration of a left cavernous sinus thrombosis is seen. New abnormal foci ofrestricted diffusion are now noted along the left medial temporal lobe, which are worrisome forcontinued progression of disease and the development of new areas of ischemic change.
Recent studies
Sepahdari et al reported on the role of DWI in detecting orbital abscess as a
complication of orbital cellulitis. The authors also assessed whether abscess can bediagnosed with a combination of conventional unenhanced sequences and whole-
brain DWI with parallel acquisition.
In the study, DWI improved diagnostic confidence in nearly all cases of orbitalabscess when used in conjunction with contrast-enhanced imaging. In addition, DWI
confirmed abscess in a majority of cases, without contrast-enhanced imaging(indicating that DWI alone can be diagnostically effective when the use of contrast
material is contraindicated).[8]
Kapur et al identified the role of DWI in differentiating orbital inflammatory
syndrome, orbital lymphoid lesions, and orbital cellulitis. The authors found asignificant difference between these conditions in DWI intensities, apparent
diffusion coefficients (ADCs), and ADC ratios.
In the study, Kapur et al noted that lymphoid lesions were significantly brighter thanorbital inflammatory syndrome and that orbital inflammatory syndrome lesions were
significantly brighter than cellulitis. In addition, lymphoid lesions showed lower ADChan orbital inflammatory syndrome and cellulitis, and a trend was seen toward
lower ADC in orbital inflammatory syndrome than in cellulitis.[9]
Preferred examination
CT scanning is often the first imaging modality that is used because of its ease and
availability at most medical institutions.[10, 11, 12]
On CT scans, a preseptal cellulitis may appear as an area of increased density, with
swelling of the anterior orbital tissues and obliteration of the adjacent fat planes.hen the infection progresses, an increase in the density of the orbital fat may
occur with gradual development of more discrete densities that, in turn, may
progress to formation of an orbital abscess.
If the infection is secondary to an underlying sinusitis, this may manifest as an
SPA. CT scanning is also usually the first imaging modality of choice to identify anSPA, which may be located just lateral to the lamina papyracea.
In pediatric patients, ophthalmic ultrasonography, in skilled hands, may be a usefuladjuvant for the rapid evaluation of preseptal versus postseptal involvement, as wellas a useful modality for a follow-up examination. However, ultrasonography is
limited in its ability to assess intracranial extension, the orbital apex, and paranasal
sinuses.[3]
MRI, especially postgadolinium-enhanced, fat-suppressed sequences, is useful forhe detection of early inflammatory changes within the orbit. On MRI, an orbital
cellulitis appears hypointense on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintense on T2-
weighted sequences. (See the images below.)[13]
http://refimgshow%2824%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
6/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 6/12
Coronal T1-weighted, postgadolinium, fat-saturated magnetic resonance image in a patient withallergic fungal sinusitis, with extension into the orbit.
Coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of a patient with allergic fungal sinusitis andextension into the orbit.
MRI is also useful for assessing intracranial extension of the infection into thecavernous sinus and for evaluating cavernous sinus thrombosis. DWI in MRI canhelp in the assessment of the optic nerves for developing ischemia or infarction,
which can occur secondarily from orbital infections. [4, 5]
MRI may be useful for evaluating immunocompromised patients who have viralinfections. Because herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) and cytomegalovirus (CMV)may lead to acute retinal necrosis (ARN) and retrobulbar optic neuritis (RBON), MRI
is more sensitive for evaluating pathophysiology in the soft tissues of the opticnerves and radiations, and this modality may demonstrate T2-weighted
hyperintensity and contrast enhancement that extends along the optic nerves, optic
racts, lateral geniculate bodies, optic radiations, and optic cortex.[10]
Plain films have limited usefulness in the diagnosis of orbital infections, especiallywith the advent of CT scanning.
Adjacent tissue may be i nvolved eit her primarily or secondarily in orbital i nfections,such as the lacrimal gland, resulting in dacryoadenitis (seen in the images below),or the lacrimal duct or sac, resulting in dacryocystitis.
Coronal computed tomography scan of a patient who was on steroids and had multiplemyeloma. In addition, the patient had infectious dacryoadenitis with Staphylococcus aureusinfection and an abscess collection.
http://refimgshow%289%29/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1210688-overviewhttp://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1210342-overviewhttp://refimgshow%288%29/http://refimgshow%287%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
7/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 7/12
Coronal computed tomography scan of a patient with dacryoadenitis and Staphylococcus aureusinfection, resulting in an abscess.
A diagnosis of dacryocystitis is m ade clinically unless adjacent periorbital cellulitis i spresent, limiting the ophthalmologic evaluation. Because the lacrimal sac is a
preseptal structure, radiographic imaging in patients with periorbital cellulitis is ahelpful adjuvant. If only the lacrimal gland is infected and inflamed, the treatment isnonsurgical because of the preseptal location. However, extension into the
postseptal space with a resultant abscess may require surgical treatment. [14, 15]
CT scanning also allows for careful evaluation of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimalducts to exclude the possibility of a dacryolith, which, although rare, can lead toobstruction of the nasolacrimal ducts and to a resultant dacryocystitis and orbital
infection.
Limitations of techniques
Limitations of MRI include the length of time that is needed to obtain the imagesand the issue of motion artifacts, which may be critical factors in patients who are
extremely ill with cerebral involvement. Metallic foreign bodies and the inability toperform MRI in patients with pacemakers, nonapproved aneurysm clips, or other
devices that are not approved for placement in the MRI scanner are additionallimitations.
Although CT scanning is useful, repeated scans can be damaging t o t he lens. Thus,
imaging studies should be tailored appropriately.
For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicineHealth's Eye and Vision
Center. Also, see eMedicineHealth's patient education articles Eyelid Inflammation(Blepharitis), Sty, and Foreign Body, Eye.
Computed Tomography
CT scanning is an extremely useful imaging modality in the setting of orbital
infections, especially in detecting SPAs. Orbital cellulitis is usually well visualizedbecause of the low density of fat on the images. Orbital cellulitis and SPAs are
seen in the images below.
Axial computed tomography scan of orbital and facial c ellulitis.
Axial computed tomography scan of orbital and facial c ellulitis.
http://refimgshow%282%29/http://refimgshow%281%29/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1217858-overviewhttp://www.emedicinehealth.com/articles/14523-1.asphttp://www.emedicinehealth.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=58821http://www.emedicinehealth.com/articles/14296-1.asphttp://www.emedicinehealth.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=60170http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1971142-overviewhttp://refimgshow%2810%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
8/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 8/12
Coronal computed tomography scan in a pediatric patient with sinusitis as well as an orbital andsubperiosteal abscess.
Axial computed tomography scan in a patient with an infection caused by Streptococcuspneumoniae and a superior orbital subperiosteal abscess that resulted in blindness.
Axial computed tomography scan in a patient with an infection caused by Streptococcuspneumoniae and a superior orbital subperiosteal abscess.
On CT scans, preseptal cellulitis may appear as an area of increased density withinhe low-density orbital fat. This may represent the first sign of infection, in which
here is obliteration of the normal fat planes and swelling of the anterior orbital softissues.
As the cellulitis progresses, more discrete densities within the orbital f at mayappear. Cellulitis is usually confined to the extraconal space however, if the
infection is allowed to progress, it can enter the muscle cone, resulting in anintraconal infection and abscess formation.
Sinus disease from the ethmoid sinuses may extend into the orbit as an SPA,
which is seen on CT examination as a thin layer of high density immediately lateral
o the lamina papyracea.[16]
Degree of confidence
Although CT scanning is an excellent imaging modality for identifying preseptalcellulitis, SPAs, defects within the lamina papyracea, and dehiscence of the bonymargins of the ethmoid sinus, this technique is not as efficacious in evaluating the
orbital apex because of the surrounding bony structures that may create artifacts in
he region.[16, 11]
False positives/negatives
Hematoma in the subperiosteal space (seen in the image below) can mimic theappearance of a subperiosteal abscess.
http://refimgshow%286%29/http://refimgshow%285%29/http://refimgshow%283%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
9/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 9/12
Coronal computed tomography scan in a patient with sickle cell disease. In this image, thepatient has a subperiosteal bleed that mimics the appearance of an infectious subperiostealabscess.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI is commonly used to assess orbital and soft-tissue disease
[17]
and hasadvantages over CT scanning in this region because of the osseous nature of the
orbital apex and its lack of signal intensity. In addition, MRI may be advantageousin evaluating any infectious process that extends from the orbital apex to the
cavernous sinus. The superior ophthalmic vein and cavernous sinus may beassessed noninvasively by evaluating the vascular flow via gradient-echo imaging.[13]
On MRI, an orbital cellulitis appears hypointense on T1-weighted images andhyperintense on T2-weighted images.
Although T1-weighted images demonstrate the normal f indings of high signalintensity of orbital fat with dark inflammatory changes, and although T2-weightedimages demonstrate the normal findings of dark orbital fat with increased high
signal-intensity inflammatory changes, the most sensitive technique for evaluating
an orbital infection may be postgadolinium, fat-suppressed imaging. [18]
MRI is especially useful in patients who have an aggressive fungal sinusitis, such asmucormycosis and aspergillosis, which has a propensity for extension into the orbit,
cavernous sinus, and neurovascular structures. (Fungal sinusitis is exhibited in theMRI scans below.) Mucormycosis is markedly angioinvasive the fungus grows into
he internal elastic membrane of the blood vessels. The fungal hyphae may thenextend into and occlude the lumina of the blood vessels they have invaded.
Coronal T1-weighted, postgadolinium, fat-saturated magnetic resonance image in a patient withallergic fungal sinusitis, with extension into the orbit.
http://refimgshow%287%29/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/353200-overviewhttp://emedicine.medscape.com/article/222551-overviewhttp://emedicine.medscape.com/article/834401-overviewhttp://refimgshow%2811%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 10/12
Coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of a patient with allergic fungal sinusitis andextension into the orbit.
Axial T1-weighted, postgadolinium magnetic resonance image in a patient with si no-orbital andcavernous sinus mucormycosis.
DWI in MRI has shown utility in assessing the optic nerves for a developing
ischemia or infarction, which may occur during orbital infections. [4, 5]
Gadolinium-based contrast agents have been linked to the development ofnephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD).
NSF/NFD has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease afterbeing given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans.NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red
or dark patches on the skin burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening ofhe skin yellow spots on the whites of the eyes joint stiffness with trouble moving
or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet pain deep in the hip bones or ribsand muscle weakness.
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography is usually performed in ophthalmology practices by trained
echnicians using a high-frequency 10-MHz probe. The probe is applied over aclosed eyelid, with the glove in a neutral position and with gentle eye motions from
left to right.
To assess the posterior aspect of the globe, the gain settings are adjusted todampen near-field echoes. To assess the vitreous and central portion of the globe,
he near-field gain is increased.
The center of the lens is anechoic, whereas the midportions of the anterior and the
posterior parts of the lens reflect the ultrasonographic beam, with the iris seen as anechogenic line on either side.
The vitreous humor is anechoic, and the posterior echogenic limit of the globe is the
retina.
Posterior to the globe, the retrobulbar fat is echogenic, with the optic nerve seen as
a hypoechoic structure that extends dorsally away from the posterior margin of the
globe. [19]
Degree of confidence
Ultrasonography requires a dedicated ophthalmologic technician and may not allow
important visualizations of the cavernous sinus and the intracranial extension ofinfections.
http://refimgshow%2815%29/http://refimgshow%288%29/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
11/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/383902-overview 11/12
Nuclear Imaging
Nuclear medicine images that use technetium-99m (99mTc) labeled leukocyteshave been useful in the diagnosis of orbital implant infections in patients in whom
CT scans failed to reveal radiographic abnormalities.[20]
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author
Claudia F E Kirsch, MD Associate Professor of Neuroradiology and Otolaryngology, Department of Radiology,Section Chief for Head and Neck Imaging, Director, Radiology Medical Student Teaching, Wexner Medical
Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Claudia F E Kirsch, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American A ssociation for WomenRadiologists,American College of Radiology,American Roentgen Ray S ociety,American S ociety of FunctionalNeuroradiology,American Society of Head and Neck Radiology,American S ociety of Neuroradiology,Association
of Educators in Imaging and Radiologic Sciences,Association of University Radiologists, British Society of Headand Neck Imaging, Eastern Neuroradiological Society, European Society of Head and Neck Radiology, New York
Academy of Sciences, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Radiologists, WesternNeuroradiological S ociety
Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Primal Pictures , for consulting Received grant/research funds fromAdenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation for other.
Coauthor(s)Roger Turbin, MDConsulting Staff, Department of Ophthalmology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Devang Gor, MDStaff Physician, Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Specialty Editor Board
Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, HuttValley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
C Douglas Phillips, MD, FACR Director of Head and Neck Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital Professor of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College
C Douglas Phillips, MD, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology,American Medical A ssociation,American Society of Head and Neck Radiology,American S ociety of
Neuroradiology,Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Chief EditorJames G Smirniotopoulos, MDProfessor of Radiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Informatics, Program
Director, Diagnostic Imaging Program, Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (CNRM), UniformedServices University of the Health Sciences
James G Smirniotopoulos, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology,
American Roentgen Ray S ociety,American Society of Head and Neck Radiology,American S ociety ofNeuroradiology,Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America,American Societyof Pediatric Neuroradiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Additional ContributorsBarton F Branstetter, IV, MDProfessor of Radiology, Otolaryngology, and Biomedical Informatics, University ofPittsburgh School of Medicine Chief of Neuroradiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Barton F Branstetter, IV, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology,
American Medical A ssociation,American Roentgen Ray S ociety,American Society of Head and Neck Radiology,American Society of Neuroradiology, Pennsylvania Medical Society, Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
References
1. Dankbaar JW, van Bemmel AJ, Pameijer FA. Imaging findings of the orbital and intracranial complications
of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Insights Imaging. 2015 Oct. 6 (5):509-18. [Medline].
2. Pakdaman MN, Sepahdari AR, Elkhamary SM. Orbital inflammatory disease: Pictorial review anddifferential diagnosis. World J Radiol. 2014 Apr 28. 6 (4):106-15. [Medline].
3. Mair MH, Geley T, Judmaier W, Gassner I. Using orbital sonography to diagnose and monitor treatment ofacute swelling of the eyelids in pediatric patients.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec. 179(6):1529-34.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
4. Mathur S, Karimi A, Mafee MF. Acute optic nerve infarction demonstrated by diffusion-weighted imaging ina case of rhinocerebral mucormycosis.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar. 28(3):489-90. [Medline].
5. Chen JS, Mukherjee P, Dillon WP, Wintermark M. Restricted diffusion in bilateral optic nerves and retinas
as an indicator of venous ischemia caused by cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2006 Oct. 27(9):1815-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
6. Yang M, Quah BL, Seah LL, Looi A. Orbital cellulitis in children-medical treatment versus surgicalmanagement. Orbit. 2009. 28(2-3):124-36. [Medline].
7. Chandler JR, Langenbrunner DJ, Stevens ER. The pathogenesis of orbital complications in acute sinusitis.Laryngoscope. 1970 Sep. 80(9):1414-28. [Medline].
http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/5470225http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/19839897http://www.ajnr.org/content/27/9/1815.fullhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/17032847http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/17353318http://www.ajronline.org/content/179/6/1529.fullhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/12438049http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/24778772http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/26253983http://www.rsna.org/http://www.pamedsoc.org/http://www.asnr.org/http://ashnr.org/http://www.arrs.org/http://ama-assn.org/http://www.acr.org/http://www.aspnr.org/http://www.rsna.org/http://www.aur.org/http://www.asnr.org/http://ashnr.org/http://www.arrs.org/http://www.acr.org/http://www.rsna.org/http://www.aur.org/http://www.asnr.org/http://ashnr.org/http://ama-assn.org/http://www.acr.org/http://www.wnrs.org/http://www.rcr.ac.uk/http://www.rsna.org/http://www.nyas.org/http://www.eshnr.eu/http://www.enrs.org/http://bshni.org.uk/http://www.aur.org/http://www.aeirs.org/http://www.asnr.org/http://ashnr.org/http://www.asfnr.org/http://www.arrs.org/http://www.acr.org/http://www.aawr.org/7/25/2019 Orbital Infection Imaging_ Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
12/12
6/27/2016 Orbital Infection Imaging: Overview, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medscape Reference 2011 WebMD, LLC
8. Sepahdari AR, Aakalu VK, Kapur R, Michals EA, Saran N, French A, et al. MRI of orbital cellulitis and
orbital abscess: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep. 193(3):W244-50.[Medline].
9. Kapur R, Sepahdari AR, Mafee MF, Putterman AM, Aakalu V, Wendel LJ, et al. MR imaging of orbital
inflammatory syndrome, orbital cellulitis, and orbital lymphoid lesions: the role of diffusion-weightedimaging.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jan. 30(1):64-70. [Medline].
10. Bert RJ, Samawareerwa R, Melhem ER. CNS MR and CT findings associated with a clinical presentationof herpetic acute retinal necrosis and herpetic retrobulbar optic neuritis: five HIV-infected and one non-
infected patients.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Nov-Dec. 25(10):1722-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
11. Asheim J, Spickler E. CT demonstration of dacryolithiasis complicated by dacryocystitis. AJNR Am JNeuroradiol. 2005 Nov-Dec. 26(10):2640-1. [Medline]. [Full Text].
12. Altini C, Niccoli Asabella A, Ferrari C, Rubini D, Dicuonzo F, Rubini G. (18)F-FDG PET/CT contribution todiagnosis and treatment response of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Hell J Nucl Med. 2015 Jan-Apr.
18 (1):68-70. [Medline].
13. Tien RD, Chu PK, Hesselink JR, Szumowski J. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MRimaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Mar-Apr. 12(2):245-53.
[Medline].
14. Ntountas I, Morschbacher R, Pratt D, et al. An orbital abscess secondary to acute dacryocystitis.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997 Sep. 28(9):758-61. [Medline].
15. Maheshwari R, Maheshwari S, Shah T. Acute dacryocystitis causing orbital cellulitis and abscess. Orbit.2009. 28(2-3):196-9. [Medline].
16. Yousem DM. Imaging of sinonasal inflammatory disease. Radiology. 1993 Aug. 188(2):303-14. [Medline].[Full Text].
17. Hayman LA, Maturi RK, Pfleger MJ, et al. MR imaging of the eyelids: normal and pathologic findings. AJRAm J Roentgenol. 1995 Sep. 165(3):639-44. [Medline]. [Full Text].
18. Cota N, Chandna A, Abernethy LJ. Orbital abscess masquerading as a rhabdomyosarcoma. J AAPOS.
2000 Oct. 4(5):318-20. [Medline].
19. McNicholas MM, Brophy DP, Power WJ, Griffin JF. Ocular sonography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Oct.
163(4):921-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
20. Kristinsson JK, Sigurdsson H, Sigfsson A, Gudmundsson S, Agnarsson BA. Detection of orbital implantinfection with technetium 99m-labeled leukocytes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Dec. 13(4):256-8.
[Medline].
http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9430302http://www.ajronline.org/content/163/4/921.full.pdf+htmlhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/8092036http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/11040485http://www.ajronline.org/content/165/3/639.full.pdf+htmlhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/7645485http://radiology.rsna.org/content/188/2/303.full.pdfhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/8327669http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/19839913http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9304639http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/1902021http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/25679078http://www.ajnr.org/content/26/10/2640.fullhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16286415http://www.ajnr.org/content/25/10/1722.fullhttp://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15569737http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/18842758http://reference.medscape.com/medline/abstract/19696266https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/pcs/click%253Fxai%253DAKAOjssjEsL62LS_lS1TUUSyQV48D0AxLc9gSSTwQ0p9EVdhrDtklUMx5dVI9vAgaCcZAxyNC-knwfueH6RYJXc5KD6iHTin5evAyFWerSc8RZiaPsJmPE5WxkxLUA35lfSD0xI_rCKX9nGVt2aH91QxvTlBXxHcb3XmOPsjeM4xss7O8wYaQscZOQl7A-Pu61yxiF2jU6Moti50ubMlWcMebZ_VLjEphA%2526sai%253DAMfl-YTW5q9fTPKMqkyU8UUH3JSwH_wRiJCUZVNTchX9sgfl65KqfuRkpZbJEV1EGR6OujBOgd93bgRQsg%2526sig%253DCg0ArKJSzLIhmaGwtm4cEAE%2526urlfix%253D1%2526adurl%253Dhttp://www.medscape.com/invitation/viewTracker.do?src=house_5