Order no. 6-252079/002 See the difference DENTSPLY Implants … · 2017-09-10 · Order no. 6-252079/002 See the difference ... DENTSPLY Implants Manufacturing GmbH P. O. Box 71 01

See the difference ...Order no. 6-252079/002

DENTSPLY Implants Manufacturing GmbHP. O. Box 71 01 11 · 68221 Mannheim/GermanyPhone +49 621 4302-1288 · Fax +49 621 47 13 06

Class I Devices

Class II a, II b and III Devices

www.dentsplyimplants.com 1012

/3.0

/WPC

Implanting TissueCare



Class I Devices



/3.0

/WPC


12. Di Iorio, D, Traini, T, Degidi, M, et al.: Quantitative evaluation of the fi brin clot extension on different implant surfaces: An in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005, 74 (1): 636-642 13. Donovan, R, Fetner, A, Koutouzis, T, and Lundgren, T: Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation. Journal of periodontology; 2010, 81 (3): 428-434 14. Döring, K, Eisenmann, E, and Stiller, M: Functional and esthetic considerations for single-tooth Ankylos implant-crowns: 8 years of clinical performance. The Journal of oral implantology; 2004, 30 (3): 198-209 15. Kitagawa, T, Tanimoto, Y, Odaki, M, et al.: Infl uence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005, 75 (2): 457-463 16. Koutouzis, T, Wallet, S, Calderon, N, and Lundgren, T: Bacterial Colonization of the Implant-Abutment Interface Utilizing an In-Vitro Dynamic Loading Model. Journal of periodontology; 201017. Lin, Y, Li, JH, Qiu, LX, et al.: [A clinical retrospective study of 10 years implant results]. Chin J Stomatol Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006, 41 (3): 131-135 18. Mairgünther, R, and Nentwig, GH: Das Dichtigkeitsverhalten des Verbindungs- systems beim zweiphasigen NM-Implantat. Z Zahnärztl Implantol; 1992, 8 (1): 50-53 19. Morris, HF, Winkler, S, Ochi, S, and Kanaan, A: A new implant designed to maximize contact with trabecular bone: survival to 18 months. The Journal of oral implantology; 2001, 27 (4): 164-173 20. Morris, HF, Ochi, S, Crum, P, et al.: AICRG, PART I: A 6-Year multicentered, multi- disciplinary clinical study of a new and innovative implant design. The Journal of oral implantology; 2004, 30 (3): 125-133 21. Moser, W, and Nentwig, GH: Finite-Element-Studien zur Optimierung von Implan- tatgewindeformen. Z Zahnärztl Implantol; 1989, 5 (1): 29-32 22. Nentwig, GH, Moser, W, Knefel, T, and Ficker, E: Three-dimensional photoelastic studies of the ANKYLOS-implant thread shape compared with conventional implant threads. Z Zahnärztl Implantol; 1992, 8 (2): 130-135 23. Nentwig, GH, Moser, W, Knefel, T, and Ficker, E: Dreidimensionale spannungs- optische Untersuchungen der NM-Implantatgewindeform im Vergleich mit her- kömmlichen Implantatgewinden. Z Zahnärztl Implantol; 1992, 8 (2): 130-135 24. Quaresma, SE, Cury, PR, Sendyk, WR, and Sendyk, C: A fi nite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. The Journal of oral implantology; 2008, 34 (1): 1-6 25. Renner, P: Flexible healing modes using a special connection - Transgingival Healing is often the Better Alternative. EDI Case Studies; 2007, 3 (4): 58-61 26. Rinke, S, Schmidt, S, and Schliephake, H: Retrospective study on the clinical viability of single-tooth Implants In the molar region of the mandible. Z Zahnärztl Implantol; 2008, 24 (4): 290-300 27. Romanos, GE, and Nentwig, GH: Immediate functional loading in the maxilla using implants with platform switching: fi ve-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009, 24 (6): 1106-1112 28. Romanos, GE, Traini, T, Johansson, CB, and Piattelli, A: Biologic width and morphologic characteristics of soft tissues around immediately loaded implants: studies performed on human autopsy specimens. Journal of periodontology; 2010, 81 (1): 70-78

29. Sakka, S, and Krenkel, C: Simultaneous maxillary sinus lifting and implant placement with autogenous parietal bone graft: Outcome of 17 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 30. Sammons, RL, Lumbikanonda, N, Gross, M, and Cantzler, P: Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron micro- scopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005, 16 (6): 657-666 31. Schwartz Fo, HO, Novaes, AB, Jr., de Castro, LM, et al.: In vitro osteogenesis on a microstructured titanium surface with additional submicron-scale topography. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007, 18 (3): 333-344 32. Sethi, A, and Kaus, T: An implant that does not smell - The Ankylos Implant. Featured in Irish Dentist-July 2002; Probe-July 2002; Dentistry- August 2003; 200233. Sethi, A, Kaus, T, Sochor, P, et al.: Evolution of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent; 2002, 11 (1): 41-48 34. Traini, T, Di Iorio, D, Caputi, S, et al.: In vitro evaluation of thermomechanic coupling in conical implant-to-abutment joint. Implant Dent; 2007, 16 (4): 379-386 35. Weigl, P: Implant prosthodontics: what next? Quintessence Int; 2003, 34 (9): 653-669 36. Weigl, P: New prosthetic restorative features of Ankylos implant system. The Journal of oral implantology; 2004, 30 (3): 178-188 37. Weng, D, Nagata, MJ, Bell, M, et al.: Infl uence of microgap location and confi guration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008, 19 (11): 1141-1147 38. Weng, D, Nagata, MJ, Bell, M, et al.: Infl uence of Microgap Location and Confi guration on Peri-implant Bone Morphology in Nonsubmerged Implants: An Experimental Study in Dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010, 25 (3): 540-547 39. Zipprich, H, Weigl, P, Lange, B, and Lauer, HC: Erfassung, Ursachen und Folgen von Mikrobewegungen am Implantat-Abutment-Interface. Implantologie; 2007, 15 (1): 31-46

since 1987 the future-oriented implant system with the unique tapered connection, platform-switching and progressive thread design has been in clinical use

1993 it is launched in the market as Nentwig-Moser implant

1994 the name is changed to ANKYLOS®

2001 the unique prosthetic concept ANKYLOS® SynCone® is developed together with Dr Dittmar May and launched in the market

2005 ANKYLOS® is given the FRIADENT®plus surface. The so far machined implant shoulder is now manufactured micro-rough

2005 the tissue-stabilizing benefi ts of ANKYLOS® are summed up under the name “TissueCare Concept”

2008 ANKYLOS® C/X is launched – the implant to which both indexed and non-indexed prosthetics can be fi tted

2009 the ANKYLOS® portfolio is extended by computer-guided implantology with ExpertEase™ and CAD/CAM fabricated ISUS bridges and bars by Compartis®

2011 sees the advent of customized CAD/CAM fabricated ANKYLOS® abutments on the market (TitaniumBase, Custom Abutment by Compartis®)

2012 the SmartFix™ Concept is introduced, the prosthetic solution on implants inserted at an angle

25 YEARS CONNECTED WITH YOU

25 years ANKYLOS®

Taper pioneers and ANKYLOS® Originators: Prof Dr Georg-Hubertus Nentwig and Dr Dipl Ing Walter Moser

1987 2001 2005 2005 2008 2009 2011 2012














25 years ANKYLOS®


1987 2001 2005 2005 2008 2009 2011 2012

2012 ANKYLOS® celebrates 25 years of implant success and its TissueCare Connection has always been a proponent of stable long-term esthetics. For 25 years ANKYLOS® has also been connected with loyal users – “connected with you”...

Right from the beginning ANKYLOS® was different from all the others: internal tapered connection, system-immanent platform-switching, progressive thread design – a small revolution in 1987. Initially ANKYLOS® was belittled as being “exotic”, then it was envied for its sensational success rates and today – well, there is a little bit of ANKYLOS® in many implant systems.The secret of ANKYLOS®? For the past 25 years your constant feedback from dental practice has been a part of the further development of ANKYLOS®. And what this means can be seen on the next few pages: See the difference...

Dr Werner GrollGroup Vice President Sales DENTSPLY Implants

Taper = TaperAnyone can make a taper. But not every taper can guarantee tissue stability: if the taper is too steep, the connection is too tight. If the taper is too wide, the connection will not provide any grip! With “The Connection”, ANKYLOS® shows you how it’s done: only 15 Ncm torque needed, self-locking, detachable again, when required – and at the same time, a stable connection without micromovement which is created for bacteria-proofness. That’s how a taper should be. But there is more to realizing the dream of long-term stable hard and soft tissues, than just the right taper…*

Tissue stability? A radiantly beautiful, natural and healthy smile!

* Literature: in the appendix

Tissue StabilityANKYLOS® is more than a taper – ANKYLOS® is TissueCare! And soft tissues just love ANKYLOS®: the geometry in the emergence region leaves plenty of room for an ample, healthy gingiva – the progressive thread design contributes to re-tention of the crestal bone and the bone apposition right up to the abutment keeps the soft tissues permanently on form.On the following pages we will introduce you to the fi ve success factors for long-lasting red-white esthetics – our “TissueCare Concept”.*

Stable, healthy soft tissues in the emergence region – for genuine long-term esthetics*

* Literature: in the appendix Fig.: Dr. Dietmar Weng, Starnberg, D

No MicromovementDon’t move! Every micromovement between the implant and the abutment irritates the peri-implant bone and may lead to bone resorption in the region of the implant shoulder. Thanks to the friction-locked and keyed ANKYLOS® TissueCare Connection, a virtually single-piece implant is formed that provides for stable tissues right from the outset.*

1,000,000 load cycles – without any effect on the implant-abutment connection*

* Literature: in the appendix Fig.: Holger Zipprich, Dr. Paul Weigl, Frankfurt/Main, D

before after

Bacteria-proofThe implant that does not “stink”: gaps between the implant and the abutment result in “offensive” bacterial colonization and hence lead to an infl ammation reaction in the tissues. ANKYLOS® stays tight!And hence, bone resorption is effectively prevented.*

The taper seals fl at – friction-locked and keyed*

* Literature: in the appendix Fig.: DENTSPLY Implants Manufacturing GmbH, Mannheim, D

Platform-SwitchingBroad, strong shoulders – exactly the right thing for long-term stable bone situations and long-lasting healthy soft tissues. Thanks to the narrower abutment, more space is created for peri-implant soft tissues – the thick implant wall gives the connection adequate stability for every implant diameter. Combined with a stable connection without micromovement which is created for bacteria-proofness and subcrestal placement – a strong team for stable tissues!*

Bone, right to the implant shoulder – the perfect base for stable soft tissues*

* Literature: in the appendix Fig.: Dr. Nigel Saynor, Stockport, UK

4 years post placement

Subcrestal PlacementEven better! A naturally esthetic emergence profi le, thanks to subcrestal placement: stable and bacteria-proof designed, “The Connection” is created for a subcrestal insertion without bone resorption: Platform-Switching facilitates bone apposition right to the abutment and hence ensures long-term excellent red esthetics.*

Three months after uncovery: bone tissue on the implant face*

* Literature: in the appendix Fig.: Dr. Dietmar Weng, Starnberg, D

MicroroughSome prefer a partner with a rough exterior: bone cells, for example. With its growth-activating FRIADENT® plus surface and a microroughness right up to the implant shoulder, “The Connection” provides unique conditions for bone apposition – right up to the abutment interface! And hence, the best preconditions for healthy soft tissues with natural papillae.*

Microrough surface right up to the abut -ment – for horizontal bone apposition*


Simple“The Connection” always fi ts: for all those who want to align abutments optimally – without index, 360° freely positionable. For all lovers of indexed prosthetics – indexed. Both options guarantee optimum stability and rotation-locking. And, thanks to the identical tapered connection for every implant diameter, every prosthetic abutment fi ts every implant. Simply brilliant, brilliantly simple!* Freely positionable or indexed – and every

prosthetic abutment fi ts into every implant*


QualityBrilliant: Stable, long-term esthetics, a well-engineered system, made in Germany, available worldwide, often imitated but never equaled – this is ANKYLOS®.At the same time, the ingenious connection technology is only one facet of many – “The Connection” is, for example, also a team of qualifi ed sales representatives who will actively support you in all implantology matters.

Ingenious implant system and surpassing service quality expertise

Bibliography:

1. Aloise, JP, Curcio, R, Laporta, MZ, et al.: Microbial leakage through the implant- abutment interface of morse taper implants in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010, 21 (3): 328-3352. Baggi, L, Cappelloni, I, Di Girolamo, M, et al.: The infl uence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional fi nite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent; 2008, 100 (6): 422-431 3. Baixe, S, Fauxpoint, G, Arntz, Y, and Etienne, O: Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010, 25 (3): 455-460 4. Barros, RR, Degidi, M, Novaes, AB, et al.: Osteocyte density in the peri-implant bone of immediately loaded and submerged dental implants. Journal of periodontology; 2009, 80 (3): 499-504 5. Bozkaya, D, Muftu, S, and Muftu, A: Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of fi ve different implants in compact bone at different load levels by fi nite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent; 2004, 92 (6): 523-530 6. Chou, CT, Morris, HF, Ochi, S, et al.: AICRG, PART II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: Loading to 36 month. The Journal of oral implantology; 2004, 30 (3): 134-143

7. Crespi, R, Cappare, P, and Gherlone, E: Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants used in an immediate loading protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009, 24 (5): 920-926 8. Degidi, M, Iezzi, G, Scarano, A, and Piattelli, A: Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design (‚beyond platform switch‘) retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008, 19 (3): 276-282 9. Degidi, M, Piattelli, A, Shibli, JA, et al.: Early bone formation around immediately restored implants with and without occlusal contact: a human histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009, 24 (4): 734-739 10. Degidi, M, Piattelli, A, Shibli, JA, et al.: Bone formation around one-stage implants with a modifi ed sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Human histological results at 4 weeks. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry; 2009, 29 (6): 607-613 11. Degidi, M, Piattelli, A, Shibli, JA, et al.: Bone formation around a dental implant with a platform switching and another with a TissueCare Connection. A histologic and histomorphometric evaluation in man TITANIUM; 2009, 1 (1): 10-17

Taper ≠ TaperBibliography: 15, 18, 39

Tissue StabilityBibliography: 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 37, 38

No MicromovementBibliography: 15, 34, 39

Bacteria-proofBibliography: 1, 3, 8, 9, 16, 18, 32

Platform-SwitchingBibliography: 2, 7, 8, 11, 13, 37, 38

Subcrestal PlacementBibliography: 2, 13, 14, 25, 32

MicroroughBibliography: 8, 10, 12, 28, 30, 31

Simple Bibliography: 35, 36

Literature














25 years ANKYLOS®


1987 2001 2005 2005 2008 2009 2011 2012



Class I Devices



/3.0

/WPC


Documents

Order no. 6-252079/002 See the difference DENTSPLY Implants … · 2017-09-10 · Order no. 6-252079/002 See the difference ... DENTSPLY Implants Manufacturing GmbH P. O. Box 71 01