U$ ~= OUcr~

FeocI AvOCllOll AltImlnt$1TCTlon Oa o n n ~co - O~ Olt ~ s bull

PtO11 W JC ~I

RECE VED

APR 5 200~ Mr john L Martin Airport Director DIRECTORS OFFICE San FranCISCO International Airport P O Bo)( 8097 San Francisco CA 94 128

Dear Mr Martin

Thank you for submitting the City of SntranciscoS FY 2004 Competition Plan update for San Francisco International Airport (SFO) and for participating In our recent telephone conference call We have reviewed your Pian update and based on thaI Information and the Information prOVided in the telephone call we have determined that your Plan update is in accordance WIth the requlfements of section 155 of the Wendell H Ford Avia tion Investment and Reform Act for the 2 Century (AIR-21) Pub L 106-181 AprilS 2000 cod ified as Title 49 US Code sections 40117(k) and lt7106(f)

The SFO FY 2004 Upaate indicates the airport has Implemented the fOllOWing competitive actions poliCies and practices

bull Contlnuln9 to maintain the Airline Liaison Office to assist airlines and the airport In implementln9 the Near Term Master Plan Program that focuses on Issues re lated to facilities and services

bull Opened the new International Terminal Complex (ITC) that added lvienty-one common-use gates with a soph isticated gate uti lization software monitonng system

bull Used PFCs to finance Sign ificant portions of the ITC enabling this e)(panslon of common use gales

bull Dlfferenuated the user cha rges for ITC tenal1ls based on the services actually provided and needed by the users

bull Included protocols for space reallocauon and recapture In the ITC lease and use agreements

bull Recaptured 9 previously exclUSive-use gates for common or preferential-use as the opportuni ty arose cue to airline bankruptcy actions

bull Initiated a competitive promotIonal markeung II1centlve program that has successfully attracted new service to SFO The program waives

50 percent of the first years landing fees for new or expanced service above eXISllng service

bull Accommodated new service Initiated by Air Tran Alrvays and Amenca Wes

bull Developed dispute resolution procedures and bull Posted current and prevIous Competit ion Plans OI the SFO web site

We understand from our telephone conversation that traffic levels at SFO are 25 percent below previous levels As a result with an average use of 3 turns per day all ofothe SFO gates are underuulized and the airport stands ready to accommodate requesting carriers You further descnbed potential constructIon options to enhance capaCity In the event traffic growth resumes

As noted above we have determined that your Update meets the requirements of section 155 of AIRmiddot21 We are enclosing with this letter a chart prepared in Apri l 2003 highlighting actions taken by airports covered by the Competition Plan requirements to reduce barriers to entry and enhance compelftlve access (SFO is included) We have dlstnbuted this product al several airport conferences In order to demonstrate the tools airport managers are uSing to comply with the statutory elements of the Competition Plan reqUirement the competitive benefits that may be achieved through implementation of these tools and other ancillary advantages that may be derived from these tools ThiS chart may be of interest to you as you implement your Compeition Plan Further although not shown on the chart at 29 of the 38 airports highlighted on the chart neVi or expanded entry or service by low-cos catrle~ has occurred and larger carners have benefited through new lease arrangements and gate

change accommodations

We take thiS opportunity to direct your attention to efforts being made by several airports to ensuring that al interested carriers are notified of the availab le of gates and of sublease opportunit ies on domestic gales In this regard several airports are util izing technology-such as websltes-to post information on gate util ization and availability Other airports utilize facsimile machines to share gate information with carner station managers and with airline headquarter offices of incumbent as well as other Interested carriers Additionally alfports have begun to develop gate assignment protocols to assure fair and transparent processing of gal e assignments We will be happy to diSCUSS thiS information in more depth With you at your convenience Please note that thiS list is not ali-inclUSive many airports have adopted a variety of compet itive practices that we wou ld be pleased to share with you

We request that you continue to post the FY 2004 Plan update on the SFO webSite We would be happy to diSCUSS any of these Items with you in more depth at your convemence

We look fOrvard to revlewmg future updates to your Competition Plan Your next update will be due 18 months from the date of this lener We will notify you before the end of your l8-month cycle as to whether you remam a covered airport As you may know the Secretary is required by section 40l 17(k) iO

review implementation of Competition Plans from time to time to verify each covered airport Implements its Plan successful ly In connect ion With our rev iew we may determme that SIte v isits to or te leconferences With one or more localions would be useful We ll1ill notify you should we decide to Visit SFO m connection with its Competition Plan

If you have any questions regard ing this letter or the FAAs review of you r Plan please contact Ms JoAnn Horne Manager Airports Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch at (202) 267-383 1

Sincerely

Dennis Roberts Director Office of A irport Planning

and Programm ing

Enclosure

AIRPORT COMPETITION PLANS

Highlights of Reported Actions to Reduce Barriers to Entry and Enhance Competitive Access

Statutorv Reouirement Page

I Availability of Gates and Related Facilities 1 II Arrange for Leasing and Subleasing 3

III Patterns of Air Service 4 IV Gate Assignment Policy 5 V Gate Use Requirement bull 6

VI Financial Constraints bull 8 VII Airport Controls over Airside and

Groundside Capacity 8 VIII Airport Intentions to Bui ld or Acquire

Gates to be Used as Common Facilities 9 IX Airfare Levels as Compared to Other

Large Airports 10

April 2003

I AVAILABILITY OF GATES ANa RELATED FACILITIES

Major poundmnts 0 Compttion PI

bull r-umbe fgales amiddot3l)ble al the ru-pon bmiddot bullae =Mge~ bull Sarrlc of gat use onnorlg chanbull bull Oescgtuon of Ihe prCHes I lor accoocia1 nw e~Cc anc rOt SC ce b

a nc enlt am bull Descrpuo~ or 31 mstance I whIch Ihe PrC compeUIlvc assu~ac ~ i

ope-rated to covc p~evl ou51y ud -use gatCSIO peerertalmiddotuse gales O~ has t caused sue ga les to becore avabl 100thes

bull Polley rg3-~-g rccaptunng PlCS t arc l01 oemg uU usc Resohm of any aCltOSI complamn durg Ie 2 monlhs prCC~ ng Ihe (hng Uscl1oe or shOllc polle)es for gates and oth bc)lIue

bull Pla 10 make gates Iltld relaled CIIICS 3adabeo new enl 00 ur ca1 thaI wanl 10 expand Se a l th -111-I Availabihty of a ru-pOrl compeliumiddot acc liuson for reqUe511rg canen0

IncJudmg ~ew ants 0 The e oluuo of = y complaims of dea of rcasoable access b a r~

enL-ar Or a~ al CaTer $eekngo expane se~ce he 2 ro~s precedlIg he (ng of the plan

0 Aue--= co01 (We- u n deuizet gates 0 Desgnaug Co)euon Access co-lttelts

Sigilct AdopUK more euymiddotfneldly leasmg 1=0

0Afrpor1 R mo ~Cpound~ access gtrotceno for Slg-3tOy Cllm I R poruu 0 PrOVding ~w au h nfO = iton oJ packages regJJdmg pO access 0 Momto~g gate ~seI Stearrluug forced aceommodauo gttoccs 0

HlgIh Renn Actio R portcd by 1Uvidllcd AtrpcrtsI Cowerte I c - ve to prefercalleases uper expltlltlo 01 exclUSIVe

I I Anchcrage eulaquo CT(Ied CO)eu)Ve Access Tea ses 0 Illc to pubhsh gate

uuhuncn L-o-aon

Provdes haC~ook ~tl amp10 l(o=aor 10 teq~C$ung ca1e aC $Allaoa uwok recap te a utlontl for uns~ faltltes bull

Developed rune Aecomrnodauons Co rne~ conss QI air sWI d lopltem 0gt 110 plannll1g and comecal management offeebull

Bubank DeOlifBre offical as ew entra lIalSor and pds Ir~ danc package

I C~cll1n)t Ug Compeciuon Ian Coord~ aor develop gtroces d me Imes 10 -Spend a eiy anner to requesa for aeecmnodalon

Compeo Tas Force estlbhshed 10 ure pel)to of copeuaonI plan and pu-S ltpaSlon and groWth ogton bull will de-elogt cantCle~ltImd handbook assg~s Ad=nra~ Offiee- to each wrlnc to manor sublease acttl aSSe operational needs 10 ensure cfkrcy 01 USc

Adaplted a pollcy Ie evcrrd s lnel middot eauuen of 10111 clause tis leae proon by B58 bull rcquc~ng CUTlet 10 C~SC WlJ bu den and educeDeOll u rnccoss a) delays aUOCla ted I~ acqur~ gate ad related faehltCl whcn the turpon 5 rabl 10 pVlde those fa~du

Ren gouae~ 10nampmiddotle xcluslve Usc )cases ta shone lrm p rfe-~ual mnlmmmiddotUe leasc lal scme lermnals) lh CO mmr1 on pan of urpltl 10Hou$IOr acgtHale Ol-e accommodations upon teqults of InlctltIM )nHobbr ln de~Joped WeClt1 c ene package tt L-cldc Gae -ugc [o=auo and a

conunenlal genera Dpue lesouon Pc~C Staent as middotn as o lhe- gte~ne nlo=auon

50 percent of the first years landing fees for new or expanced service above eXISllng service

bull Accommodated new service Initiated by Air Tran Alrvays and Amenca Wes

bull Developed dispute resolution procedures and bull Posted current and prevIous Competit ion Plans OI the SFO web site

We understand from our telephone conversation that traffic levels at SFO are 25 percent below previous levels As a result with an average use of 3 turns per day all ofothe SFO gates are underuulized and the airport stands ready to accommodate requesting carriers You further descnbed potential constructIon options to enhance capaCity In the event traffic growth resumes

As noted above we have determined that your Update meets the requirements of section 155 of AIRmiddot21 We are enclosing with this letter a chart prepared in Apri l 2003 highlighting actions taken by airports covered by the Competition Plan requirements to reduce barriers to entry and enhance compelftlve access (SFO is included) We have dlstnbuted this product al several airport conferences In order to demonstrate the tools airport managers are uSing to comply with the statutory elements of the Competition Plan reqUirement the competitive benefits that may be achieved through implementation of these tools and other ancillary advantages that may be derived from these tools ThiS chart may be of interest to you as you implement your Compeition Plan Further although not shown on the chart at 29 of the 38 airports highlighted on the chart neVi or expanded entry or service by low-cos catrle~ has occurred and larger carners have benefited through new lease arrangements and gate

change accommodations

We take thiS opportunity to direct your attention to efforts being made by several airports to ensuring that al interested carriers are notified of the availab le of gates and of sublease opportunit ies on domestic gales In this regard several airports are util izing technology-such as websltes-to post information on gate util ization and availability Other airports utilize facsimile machines to share gate information with carner station managers and with airline headquarter offices of incumbent as well as other Interested carriers Additionally alfports have begun to develop gate assignment protocols to assure fair and transparent processing of gal e assignments We will be happy to diSCUSS thiS information in more depth With you at your convenience Please note that thiS list is not ali-inclUSive many airports have adopted a variety of compet itive practices that we wou ld be pleased to share with you

We request that you continue to post the FY 2004 Plan update on the SFO webSite We would be happy to diSCUSS any of these Items with you in more depth at your convemence

We look fOrvard to revlewmg future updates to your Competition Plan Your next update will be due 18 months from the date of this lener We will notify you before the end of your l8-month cycle as to whether you remam a covered airport As you may know the Secretary is required by section 40l 17(k) iO

review implementation of Competition Plans from time to time to verify each covered airport Implements its Plan successful ly In connect ion With our rev iew we may determme that SIte v isits to or te leconferences With one or more localions would be useful We ll1ill notify you should we decide to Visit SFO m connection with its Competition Plan

If you have any questions regard ing this letter or the FAAs review of you r Plan please contact Ms JoAnn Horne Manager Airports Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch at (202) 267-383 1

Sincerely

Dennis Roberts Director Office of A irport Planning

and Programm ing

Enclosure

AIRPORT COMPETITION PLANS

Highlights of Reported Actions to Reduce Barriers to Entry and Enhance Competitive Access

Statutorv Reouirement Page

I Availability of Gates and Related Facilities 1 II Arrange for Leasing and Subleasing 3

III Patterns of Air Service 4 IV Gate Assignment Policy 5 V Gate Use Requirement bull 6

VI Financial Constraints bull 8 VII Airport Controls over Airside and

Groundside Capacity 8 VIII Airport Intentions to Bui ld or Acquire

Gates to be Used as Common Facilities 9 IX Airfare Levels as Compared to Other

Large Airports 10

April 2003

I AVAILABILITY OF GATES ANa RELATED FACILITIES

Major poundmnts 0 Compttion PI

bull r-umbe fgales amiddot3l)ble al the ru-pon bmiddot bullae =Mge~ bull Sarrlc of gat use onnorlg chanbull bull Oescgtuon of Ihe prCHes I lor accoocia1 nw e~Cc anc rOt SC ce b

a nc enlt am bull Descrpuo~ or 31 mstance I whIch Ihe PrC compeUIlvc assu~ac ~ i

ope-rated to covc p~evl ou51y ud -use gatCSIO peerertalmiddotuse gales O~ has t caused sue ga les to becore avabl 100thes

bull Polley rg3-~-g rccaptunng PlCS t arc l01 oemg uU usc Resohm of any aCltOSI complamn durg Ie 2 monlhs prCC~ ng Ihe (hng Uscl1oe or shOllc polle)es for gates and oth bc)lIue

bull Pla 10 make gates Iltld relaled CIIICS 3adabeo new enl 00 ur ca1 thaI wanl 10 expand Se a l th -111-I Availabihty of a ru-pOrl compeliumiddot acc liuson for reqUe511rg canen0

IncJudmg ~ew ants 0 The e oluuo of = y complaims of dea of rcasoable access b a r~

enL-ar Or a~ al CaTer $eekngo expane se~ce he 2 ro~s precedlIg he (ng of the plan

0 Aue--= co01 (We- u n deuizet gates 0 Desgnaug Co)euon Access co-lttelts

Sigilct AdopUK more euymiddotfneldly leasmg 1=0

0Afrpor1 R mo ~Cpound~ access gtrotceno for Slg-3tOy Cllm I R poruu 0 PrOVding ~w au h nfO = iton oJ packages regJJdmg pO access 0 Momto~g gate ~seI Stearrluug forced aceommodauo gttoccs 0

HlgIh Renn Actio R portcd by 1Uvidllcd AtrpcrtsI Cowerte I c - ve to prefercalleases uper expltlltlo 01 exclUSIVe

I I Anchcrage eulaquo CT(Ied CO)eu)Ve Access Tea ses 0 Illc to pubhsh gate

uuhuncn L-o-aon

Provdes haC~ook ~tl amp10 l(o=aor 10 teq~C$ung ca1e aC $Allaoa uwok recap te a utlontl for uns~ faltltes bull

Developed rune Aecomrnodauons Co rne~ conss QI air sWI d lopltem 0gt 110 plannll1g and comecal management offeebull

Bubank DeOlifBre offical as ew entra lIalSor and pds Ir~ danc package

I C~cll1n)t Ug Compeciuon Ian Coord~ aor develop gtroces d me Imes 10 -Spend a eiy anner to requesa for aeecmnodalon

Compeo Tas Force estlbhshed 10 ure pel)to of copeuaonI plan and pu-S ltpaSlon and groWth ogton bull will de-elogt cantCle~ltImd handbook assg~s Ad=nra~ Offiee- to each wrlnc to manor sublease acttl aSSe operational needs 10 ensure cfkrcy 01 USc

Adaplted a pollcy Ie evcrrd s lnel middot eauuen of 10111 clause tis leae proon by B58 bull rcquc~ng CUTlet 10 C~SC WlJ bu den and educeDeOll u rnccoss a) delays aUOCla ted I~ acqur~ gate ad related faehltCl whcn the turpon 5 rabl 10 pVlde those fa~du

Ren gouae~ 10nampmiddotle xcluslve Usc )cases ta shone lrm p rfe-~ual mnlmmmiddotUe leasc lal scme lermnals) lh CO mmr1 on pan of urpltl 10Hou$IOr acgtHale Ol-e accommodations upon teqults of InlctltIM )nHobbr ln de~Joped WeClt1 c ene package tt L-cldc Gae -ugc [o=auo and a

conunenlal genera Dpue lesouon Pc~C Staent as middotn as o lhe- gte~ne nlo=auon

We look fOrvard to revlewmg future updates to your Competition Plan Your next update will be due 18 months from the date of this lener We will notify you before the end of your l8-month cycle as to whether you remam a covered airport As you may know the Secretary is required by section 40l 17(k) iO

review implementation of Competition Plans from time to time to verify each covered airport Implements its Plan successful ly In connect ion With our rev iew we may determme that SIte v isits to or te leconferences With one or more localions would be useful We ll1ill notify you should we decide to Visit SFO m connection with its Competition Plan

If you have any questions regard ing this letter or the FAAs review of you r Plan please contact Ms JoAnn Horne Manager Airports Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch at (202) 267-383 1

Sincerely

Dennis Roberts Director Office of A irport Planning

and Programm ing

Enclosure

AIRPORT COMPETITION PLANS

Highlights of Reported Actions to Reduce Barriers to Entry and Enhance Competitive Access

Statutorv Reouirement Page

I Availability of Gates and Related Facilities 1 II Arrange for Leasing and Subleasing 3

III Patterns of Air Service 4 IV Gate Assignment Policy 5 V Gate Use Requirement bull 6

VI Financial Constraints bull 8 VII Airport Controls over Airside and

Groundside Capacity 8 VIII Airport Intentions to Bui ld or Acquire

Gates to be Used as Common Facilities 9 IX Airfare Levels as Compared to Other

Large Airports 10

April 2003

I AVAILABILITY OF GATES ANa RELATED FACILITIES

Major poundmnts 0 Compttion PI

bull r-umbe fgales amiddot3l)ble al the ru-pon bmiddot bullae =Mge~ bull Sarrlc of gat use onnorlg chanbull bull Oescgtuon of Ihe prCHes I lor accoocia1 nw e~Cc anc rOt SC ce b

a nc enlt am bull Descrpuo~ or 31 mstance I whIch Ihe PrC compeUIlvc assu~ac ~ i

ope-rated to covc p~evl ou51y ud -use gatCSIO peerertalmiddotuse gales O~ has t caused sue ga les to becore avabl 100thes

bull Polley rg3-~-g rccaptunng PlCS t arc l01 oemg uU usc Resohm of any aCltOSI complamn durg Ie 2 monlhs prCC~ ng Ihe (hng Uscl1oe or shOllc polle)es for gates and oth bc)lIue

bull Pla 10 make gates Iltld relaled CIIICS 3adabeo new enl 00 ur ca1 thaI wanl 10 expand Se a l th -111-I Availabihty of a ru-pOrl compeliumiddot acc liuson for reqUe511rg canen0

IncJudmg ~ew ants 0 The e oluuo of = y complaims of dea of rcasoable access b a r~

enL-ar Or a~ al CaTer $eekngo expane se~ce he 2 ro~s precedlIg he (ng of the plan

0 Aue--= co01 (We- u n deuizet gates 0 Desgnaug Co)euon Access co-lttelts

Sigilct AdopUK more euymiddotfneldly leasmg 1=0

0Afrpor1 R mo ~Cpound~ access gtrotceno for Slg-3tOy Cllm I R poruu 0 PrOVding ~w au h nfO = iton oJ packages regJJdmg pO access 0 Momto~g gate ~seI Stearrluug forced aceommodauo gttoccs 0

HlgIh Renn Actio R portcd by 1Uvidllcd AtrpcrtsI Cowerte I c - ve to prefercalleases uper expltlltlo 01 exclUSIVe

I I Anchcrage eulaquo CT(Ied CO)eu)Ve Access Tea ses 0 Illc to pubhsh gate

uuhuncn L-o-aon

Provdes haC~ook ~tl amp10 l(o=aor 10 teq~C$ung ca1e aC $Allaoa uwok recap te a utlontl for uns~ faltltes bull

Developed rune Aecomrnodauons Co rne~ conss QI air sWI d lopltem 0gt 110 plannll1g and comecal management offeebull

Bubank DeOlifBre offical as ew entra lIalSor and pds Ir~ danc package

I C~cll1n)t Ug Compeciuon Ian Coord~ aor develop gtroces d me Imes 10 -Spend a eiy anner to requesa for aeecmnodalon

Compeo Tas Force estlbhshed 10 ure pel)to of copeuaonI plan and pu-S ltpaSlon and groWth ogton bull will de-elogt cantCle~ltImd handbook assg~s Ad=nra~ Offiee- to each wrlnc to manor sublease acttl aSSe operational needs 10 ensure cfkrcy 01 USc

Adaplted a pollcy Ie evcrrd s lnel middot eauuen of 10111 clause tis leae proon by B58 bull rcquc~ng CUTlet 10 C~SC WlJ bu den and educeDeOll u rnccoss a) delays aUOCla ted I~ acqur~ gate ad related faehltCl whcn the turpon 5 rabl 10 pVlde those fa~du

Ren gouae~ 10nampmiddotle xcluslve Usc )cases ta shone lrm p rfe-~ual mnlmmmiddotUe leasc lal scme lermnals) lh CO mmr1 on pan of urpltl 10Hou$IOr acgtHale Ol-e accommodations upon teqults of InlctltIM )nHobbr ln de~Joped WeClt1 c ene package tt L-cldc Gae -ugc [o=auo and a

conunenlal genera Dpue lesouon Pc~C Staent as middotn as o lhe- gte~ne nlo=auon

AIRPORT COMPETITION PLANS

Highlights of Reported Actions to Reduce Barriers to Entry and Enhance Competitive Access

Statutorv Reouirement Page

I Availability of Gates and Related Facilities 1 II Arrange for Leasing and Subleasing 3

III Patterns of Air Service 4 IV Gate Assignment Policy 5 V Gate Use Requirement bull 6

VI Financial Constraints bull 8 VII Airport Controls over Airside and

Groundside Capacity 8 VIII Airport Intentions to Bui ld or Acquire

Gates to be Used as Common Facilities 9 IX Airfare Levels as Compared to Other

Large Airports 10

April 2003

I AVAILABILITY OF GATES ANa RELATED FACILITIES

Major poundmnts 0 Compttion PI

bull r-umbe fgales amiddot3l)ble al the ru-pon bmiddot bullae =Mge~ bull Sarrlc of gat use onnorlg chanbull bull Oescgtuon of Ihe prCHes I lor accoocia1 nw e~Cc anc rOt SC ce b

a nc enlt am bull Descrpuo~ or 31 mstance I whIch Ihe PrC compeUIlvc assu~ac ~ i

ope-rated to covc p~evl ou51y ud -use gatCSIO peerertalmiddotuse gales O~ has t caused sue ga les to becore avabl 100thes

bull Polley rg3-~-g rccaptunng PlCS t arc l01 oemg uU usc Resohm of any aCltOSI complamn durg Ie 2 monlhs prCC~ ng Ihe (hng Uscl1oe or shOllc polle)es for gates and oth bc)lIue

bull Pla 10 make gates Iltld relaled CIIICS 3adabeo new enl 00 ur ca1 thaI wanl 10 expand Se a l th -111-I Availabihty of a ru-pOrl compeliumiddot acc liuson for reqUe511rg canen0

IncJudmg ~ew ants 0 The e oluuo of = y complaims of dea of rcasoable access b a r~

enL-ar Or a~ al CaTer $eekngo expane se~ce he 2 ro~s precedlIg he (ng of the plan

0 Aue--= co01 (We- u n deuizet gates 0 Desgnaug Co)euon Access co-lttelts

Sigilct AdopUK more euymiddotfneldly leasmg 1=0

0Afrpor1 R mo ~Cpound~ access gtrotceno for Slg-3tOy Cllm I R poruu 0 PrOVding ~w au h nfO = iton oJ packages regJJdmg pO access 0 Momto~g gate ~seI Stearrluug forced aceommodauo gttoccs 0

HlgIh Renn Actio R portcd by 1Uvidllcd AtrpcrtsI Cowerte I c - ve to prefercalleases uper expltlltlo 01 exclUSIVe

I I Anchcrage eulaquo CT(Ied CO)eu)Ve Access Tea ses 0 Illc to pubhsh gate

uuhuncn L-o-aon

Provdes haC~ook ~tl amp10 l(o=aor 10 teq~C$ung ca1e aC $Allaoa uwok recap te a utlontl for uns~ faltltes bull

Developed rune Aecomrnodauons Co rne~ conss QI air sWI d lopltem 0gt 110 plannll1g and comecal management offeebull

Bubank DeOlifBre offical as ew entra lIalSor and pds Ir~ danc package

I C~cll1n)t Ug Compeciuon Ian Coord~ aor develop gtroces d me Imes 10 -Spend a eiy anner to requesa for aeecmnodalon

Compeo Tas Force estlbhshed 10 ure pel)to of copeuaonI plan and pu-S ltpaSlon and groWth ogton bull will de-elogt cantCle~ltImd handbook assg~s Ad=nra~ Offiee- to each wrlnc to manor sublease acttl aSSe operational needs 10 ensure cfkrcy 01 USc

Adaplted a pollcy Ie evcrrd s lnel middot eauuen of 10111 clause tis leae proon by B58 bull rcquc~ng CUTlet 10 C~SC WlJ bu den and educeDeOll u rnccoss a) delays aUOCla ted I~ acqur~ gate ad related faehltCl whcn the turpon 5 rabl 10 pVlde those fa~du

Ren gouae~ 10nampmiddotle xcluslve Usc )cases ta shone lrm p rfe-~ual mnlmmmiddotUe leasc lal scme lermnals) lh CO mmr1 on pan of urpltl 10Hou$IOr acgtHale Ol-e accommodations upon teqults of InlctltIM )nHobbr ln de~Joped WeClt1 c ene package tt L-cldc Gae -ugc [o=auo and a

conunenlal genera Dpue lesouon Pc~C Staent as middotn as o lhe- gte~ne nlo=auon

I AVAILABILITY OF GATES ANa RELATED FACILITIES

Major poundmnts 0 Compttion PI

bull r-umbe fgales amiddot3l)ble al the ru-pon bmiddot bullae =Mge~ bull Sarrlc of gat use onnorlg chanbull bull Oescgtuon of Ihe prCHes I lor accoocia1 nw e~Cc anc rOt SC ce b

a nc enlt am bull Descrpuo~ or 31 mstance I whIch Ihe PrC compeUIlvc assu~ac ~ i

ope-rated to covc p~evl ou51y ud -use gatCSIO peerertalmiddotuse gales O~ has t caused sue ga les to becore avabl 100thes

bull Polley rg3-~-g rccaptunng PlCS t arc l01 oemg uU usc Resohm of any aCltOSI complamn durg Ie 2 monlhs prCC~ ng Ihe (hng Uscl1oe or shOllc polle)es for gates and oth bc)lIue

bull Pla 10 make gates Iltld relaled CIIICS 3adabeo new enl 00 ur ca1 thaI wanl 10 expand Se a l th -111-I Availabihty of a ru-pOrl compeliumiddot acc liuson for reqUe511rg canen0

IncJudmg ~ew ants 0 The e oluuo of = y complaims of dea of rcasoable access b a r~

enL-ar Or a~ al CaTer $eekngo expane se~ce he 2 ro~s precedlIg he (ng of the plan

0 Aue--= co01 (We- u n deuizet gates 0 Desgnaug Co)euon Access co-lttelts

Sigilct AdopUK more euymiddotfneldly leasmg 1=0

0Afrpor1 R mo ~Cpound~ access gtrotceno for Slg-3tOy Cllm I R poruu 0 PrOVding ~w au h nfO = iton oJ packages regJJdmg pO access 0 Momto~g gate ~seI Stearrluug forced aceommodauo gttoccs 0

HlgIh Renn Actio R portcd by 1Uvidllcd AtrpcrtsI Cowerte I c - ve to prefercalleases uper expltlltlo 01 exclUSIVe

I I Anchcrage eulaquo CT(Ied CO)eu)Ve Access Tea ses 0 Illc to pubhsh gate

uuhuncn L-o-aon

Provdes haC~ook ~tl amp10 l(o=aor 10 teq~C$ung ca1e aC $Allaoa uwok recap te a utlontl for uns~ faltltes bull

Developed rune Aecomrnodauons Co rne~ conss QI air sWI d lopltem 0gt 110 plannll1g and comecal management offeebull

Bubank DeOlifBre offical as ew entra lIalSor and pds Ir~ danc package

I C~cll1n)t Ug Compeciuon Ian Coord~ aor develop gtroces d me Imes 10 -Spend a eiy anner to requesa for aeecmnodalon

Compeo Tas Force estlbhshed 10 ure pel)to of copeuaonI plan and pu-S ltpaSlon and groWth ogton bull will de-elogt cantCle~ltImd handbook assg~s Ad=nra~ Offiee- to each wrlnc to manor sublease acttl aSSe operational needs 10 ensure cfkrcy 01 USc

Adaplted a pollcy Ie evcrrd s lnel middot eauuen of 10111 clause tis leae proon by B58 bull rcquc~ng CUTlet 10 C~SC WlJ bu den and educeDeOll u rnccoss a) delays aUOCla ted I~ acqur~ gate ad related faehltCl whcn the turpon 5 rabl 10 pVlde those fa~du

Ren gouae~ 10nampmiddotle xcluslve Usc )cases ta shone lrm p rfe-~ual mnlmmmiddotUe leasc lal scme lermnals) lh CO mmr1 on pan of urpltl 10Hou$IOr acgtHale Ol-e accommodations upon teqults of InlctltIM )nHobbr ln de~Joped WeClt1 c ene package tt L-cldc Gae -ugc [o=auo and a

conunenlal genera Dpue lesouon Pc~C Staent as middotn as o lhe- gte~ne nlo=auon

I

Remo~ee poea obstacle for accom oeJo ampa eab 0 cameMIlwaukee

to cfuse to accommoeet -erttl compcUlo

lnenook Corpemle Iukerg amiddote llh lowf ca-Iegt and creacC horle= galbullbull vmh preferences for ~eW e~atl C(IJT1S crele~ leW el~r pac~age h piaIl ICgt pubs 1nfcgtrm~on packag on web sne

Sreahng extauuon of effort require by usng web e to encour~e new enlra w conlact rpCgtrt ellectly ~S1lS ellrer - volu ta INashvtll acccmmocauor ae negouauons nd a umetn bull llend 10 ec~pue Iean leaselt gales UgtO1 reltues of anOlhe~ caeshy lraled -ew of Maste uinc leases deUed Ilovons ea~rg allPO ro regam -Ono cool OVltr he UIC of PC oed 0 rgtplu PIC or 10 force

I NCIIak accorrocaon On gales based on uuhzuon slIdy slre3mlmcd [OITed accomodauo cau~ )y remoVIng an ecent~u $Uon of effCgtrts appcnl~d New Em Mang ard developed New En~an Atrtne RIghts packge

Inill4ng COr_~On usc tl~k eung equlpme atlkel coumers aIld gales 00 Ih 111 ales 0gteauns Ihere willllse de ~nca ga checkmiddot and pt CUTE equpbull Iheby proV1dl n g ma 1 nexbdy n asslgnmg gales en on aOalltlad pe rg~1 lUIS theey Increu he oportnt1cs for comgteo pOVldes Ime Eny gtadeas and airport faeal negonallons be qesmg ca-ncrs ard cube

Flealbullbull piC shag requns and ~il enforce lease clause eqng Pm-J1Cerce ltq bull 1 = to conUlCI all sgna la s

Is forrtIl - g gale alabiltty Inforrnon gt- prep3rng an AIrtne In fo=al1on Package cona~ g nfo-nalion on alabl gats I=S of ces s So ramen10 predure for s~cung fac]hlies for new er 10 be rra~e avaJIa ble on the gtons eb page and 1Ipon ecr~ut

Sla Up gtackage 1Vdeltllo eq1lcu-g cae ledes a pe uuhzauon Salt Lake -ltgte uma-y a Slalme abolll he or dplIle ruolllon 1cces as C1lY 31 01 necessa- 1110=IIuo aboul opeamg a (he au-por Negouaed exps eas 10 pd fo 1-naI-U AvtllUOn Depat~nSa AnOr]O SlSt eltieo~-g alres on ga~g access

SM Invoke ~orcClt aecoooa[on oau~ ~ enure thaI empora) goe needs of Franc so new enan ill ij es were met

ESlal1bhed a T~ar Ltson Corr111ee 10 respond Iegt requcst for aCcesS with a reasonable lime galher 3P Opro n[o=al1o me WlCt relevallt 1lOfl ~eonre prOV1d ale l)Il=on rormal1on 10 eqllestng Ie andSan Jose mCl as an e=3o-y between prospeltl1ve r[n and cumbe artme 10

I I cgtltped acco_gtor assved ropey Managemen pe-sone] fl

poml of contact

Deelep poic 0 sale Usc and rororg equtrerrems to be apphed 10 all

I gales drafg bleas gudehnes 3od reqUtremenlS developmg COmpl31nlS Sar Ju= 3old dslu laquo UOIUllOn paltCj an deeiopmg a aSIcr luse orporau8 the

I reeece~ polltc$ and proced1l rcs

I II ARRANGE FOR LEASING AND SUBLEASING

bull Ihe~her subluslng or hndling aangemon Willi meu benl carner neens)

bull How the airport ass sts requS[lng airim 10 oba n ~ 5ubl~ase ac had[~ arrangement

bull Airport tsghl poHcles for subleUO r MQ)o~ pound1 of middot Process by lIien avablbU tty of f~lte fOl ubouse or shannS roltrrnunICJI~

Co~t1tto PI 10 o(Mr inierePd c~rrter

bull Alrpon pohltlCS ~gardlng lublea~ f~ bull How complaints by submiddottenants ~booJ eess subleaw fees a resoh Pd bull Ho Mlmiem rnnctors who wan to provide leI lie as ground

handling are acrommooaled bull formal dispute resclullon procedure

bull Btginning to develop dispute resoluton prClCeu SignljIcan t bull ening mOre contrQi and overslgh l over ubluse r~s terrr ~nlt conditions

Airport bull Imposing sublu~ caps on adminlstratigte foe Rupo~s bull ReVIeWIng ~ndlor pre-approving subleases

bull NotifYing earners of gatO$ avanabe for subuse

Highlights oJ R~nnt Actions R~portd by r dfdutll AfrpoftS

A~queue Adopung dispu bullbullbulloluuon procedus

RequUe 11gt0 approval and cap adn-auve [en adopang c~UtCAnchoragc rbullbulloluuon probullbulldu

Alana Adopung dispet rsolutlon procedes_

Auun Requ aL-po~ approvallLtld caps aC namiddot ohetd fee

W Caps fee ad N~-S augtOrt approval

ChltaiO Adopting dispute ~olution procedue_

OHare

C~~ago Oae comee i developUs dISpute c~hmon procedue [or use on comesuc Midy gltebull

Pre-approves subleases caps rees conon-uc gale pol~ol rnges gate Cleveland occupancy Ics and fines uSer [or fruler to comply adopung dspele

resollmon procCltus

Adopted a pohcy to cap sublease admllln fees Lcwe Field

Adoptlnll dpuu ohmon procedureFar Worth

[en Adopting clSpute re olluon procedue

Caps su blease fee for foncd a~comrnodaton arrangements reques arport Detroit approval for u ~le with new entrants gate uulizaton poh~y assures ~hat

subtenont ill not b disadvan~ged by ~ slthedule ehan Ke of the enant

Hou~on

HobbyJ lller - Will ~I1Ae the devlopmcn [ of a fonnal dspuc resolution prottss cOlUnctal

~U1Ul ReqUITeS prc -appromiddota1 or a sublese and docouratcs exceSSIVe su~lease m

Mep ~dDp lLng dplHe resolu[Jon procedures

Is develop ore oIIed proccau or hetrIg coplas Igt addtor 10 conslderug eDmp~rIs al aIlOn a- 0 air es aJIa-s ~laquomiddotl-gbull bullage - -

I Reqs agton nal3g-middots pemiddotappro-al or blea 0 assSen esmeI OakJad omoum of aUIeel space 1l1I mal be assl~ed or suble to aolher T ups fees

Oano Is delmiddoteloplr g a Calc Use Commmee 10 esolve dlipbullbulle tmelne [0 appUS I

Prcmiddotappmiddot~ reqd for subleau$ arrpor has aultomiddot 10 ecptgtI Palm Beach subleased eltlmes wh en ley repesc over 5010 of lte anI leold I caps adrale tts adopurg dispute etOaon prneedulnI Rero Adoptmg dspule esollun procedur San AmonLO Adopmg dLspule esolDr procedures

I Agton consent euleerl for subleases groundmiddothallmg fees ue subJ to Sa Lou II1rpo- Oe peer=ualmiddotuu blcslt t=s a fees subJelt to alrpon

ovegl III address sublease rnark-~gts n ne lIillme usc aampn=emert

I Developed an Alrle ccess Compl fom ant esabhshed preeedure fo

rcsoIVl~g compllLlnu v-ithm a reaenable tmc Also CTSeeS ublease ftt perSan Jose

reVIsed leasernd appties as a matte 01 polley sublease fee caps on subleases cxeC1elt unde oide asteT lease

Adopmg rllSpule esoiuon proce~lre$FrarelSco

Washn i lon Rebullbull pnor apgtroal of subleau arc I-ardlirg agreemens caps I lIlas Dullu rtt

III PATTERNS OF AIR SERVICE

I bull ~arko urvcerl MGjo~ poundleenU 0 bull Smail communltu evcd Compertion Plan bull Mark served by tomiddotmiddotfare carner

bull New mark added or drop~ in past v

Slgnijklttnt bull Using markt analysis 10 add compJv~ nvitAirport

RUponsu bull USIng makttng tOOlS to a ttract Jomiddotfar ServICU

H fghlfghU oj Recent Aetions Reported by IndIvidua l Airports

Albuqlnquc Insmuted New Erlfa Pro-mononu Program an neenve to premme compeuu n

Peformed a Compeve AlI Servce Asbullbullument ndeang peasblle fer Chade addlrg low fan orne fVlCe On Cem~ rOUln mpemcnted markeung gtIan to

Ittrae addonal Ur-ee

I I Elnaed surcharge on us of eommonmiddotuS Raes fo a bullbullsonaJ or errpoy

bus IS cordlc~l1 r SeIICe enhancemen eampalgn to nerease thIPalm Beach Serce oppontte ~middotalla bl at lis port lind to enha1 cc the revenuemiddot gene~g Oppelures fer 8lr)ncsI

PrOVIdes A-hre lro=anon Packa~ adcpltt Air 5ltce Ma~ l~ce Ptsburg~ Program [0 ercourage re and eornpewe t semee for exstg ac ~e

ear-e-s

New AIthne b ceuve Po~c mplemeed SUltlness Oevelopmet ac Propert Adnmtrauor OI1S10n coordates the accoodauon of servce and faclmes

Reno for new enrams c~ dlng asssurg nego3on 1n mc-benl Slgnato Illrhs ad P3-ccpatlon n mcete progru

III GATE ASSIGNMENT POLICY

bull Method of info rming carrers of gale slgnmen poliCiMajo~ Elments of

bull Me~hOltis for anncuntlns to c~rre when galeS bl(ome Dailabl~Competition PZ bull Poli~is on a~mgmng RON pesllions

Slgnljlt bull Adopting ga augnmillt protocols WIth CCosderon for ne ~nlr3nu Afrpot bull Changng sgnalory pelidu 10 leuen burdens on Igte enr3nts

Repo bull Noufying ali carners of gate IVIUabiluv

Highlfgh tt of Re~nt Actio Rpotcd till Indltlidud Alrp

PoslS lae ~tilzaJon Information labhty on web ste s ceqeltI to poStilncloraKC pubhe Olce poc 10 leasnl pace

Will add hnk 10 eb sne ror lenant l~ o=auon II pOSI nfocrra~on onAtlanla lndenacd gates afl~r Kate lie u-veys

Will revise polley IO oITer Ilvalo~middot Sl~[u 10 ay are IILS and ualified to IIS1me subtaalIy slrular obug as Ihose reqeltc of $g~IOY carne wher cUe to tte phYSIcal space u=tauons at the argton Ihllt ru~he SBil l otte~le ~=c~ fo= leasg a f~ coplemen of space M$ltgt V111 pos pIe bold roo ruabilily mfo-a 0 Is b pale 3Id ~ll acheruseI annoce 0 gatesI

Charloue NOmiddotgnalor-Irew emrant land ree os the same as a ligralorlanhng fee

ChlcaKO NOlled aU carne by facs1mlle of -aiabhlmiddot of COmmOnmiddotuse sateOHare

Hounon Reauigne~ undesec lused space t() al emben alr ca for os

Ine ePanorconuental

Proiublll cae-s from cOlllrolh-g ga ass~ems Ld f-om morfernnl or Marn asllgnLg eke COlnle r pouon$ shanng of conuglous and undermiddot

uu1zelt ticket coU~te

NashlIe Will poSI mfc=auon on glto IVldab= on liS web Slle

Noufied ereste~ U blenanl Carrers of pOlombull1 gale amiddotaI1abihly dlnng Masler lease Uhlizallon revow proxess adogted common ue prccedureslfor uSe 10Newark resolve cO~~lg nleresls n a gael h a pnomv 10 new entrant offenng compe~te crce

PrOV1du middoter noaficallon to aJrlles as gale beco me avu(lb]lIId nludu OakJa~e SUrnate date of aVlllablny requesr~ alr ~u provde ent and

planeed sc~edule nfornltlon

Inend 10 asscg ~ garcs on bass 0middot accogdan ~op~ = ne Phoeelpha s~e conscenrg aon olh facon hellle arhne a middot0 fare udw

nonstop =k Iz of arnra [ec~ec of opOllI cc

For PFemiddotfnanced ates rpcrt ~U Wmiddot gtrommiddot to rew comiddot arPusburgh Ser1ce 5lgnalOy fee statu no depenc n cr mllim leasole

II sdrtng - edopmn of ccntractual andor r~Jlalo tools [0 allo

PhOCrllX

Sacramemo

aJrport 0 ~e coordnate galemiddotsha-Hg opxmunmes preces ga le ue Lnd schedule I(o=aon 10 p rolpe eUan cae$ gtr1wdes Nemiddot Enmlrll Inlo== package COntllltung gate u1=on tnfc=aucn to rospe em3-~ 10 enable It 10 make nfc=ed CerlJlor on whch ncueu- cllT1e to conracl fo haelt1 gale a=os

Repla~ee e=ny oro1a1ee gate uSlgnn rocs with a leue ag=o prceng ro shaHerm proreeuamiddotue leases subJertlo aor nser II cevelopng Allne Inforrnauon Package 0 be pro1ded on agtos web page

Signaloy us ~vailble 0 subterants gale asSignment pocedu re~ 11 be pubbshed on we Sll I multaneousy advlS ail cane of gate n~abblr

Samt Lou will use ts web sue 10 p ubllh rele= mfonrallOl ror l es urpor developg ac placIIg wne~es or acce eIY agem I COltL1Ct pont fa em nu a5 wdlas adlltal1llg subleasc acccnmodauQn

v GATE USE REQ UREMENT

bull G~I us monitortn pelley bull RO--l monitonng poliCY bull Requcment for sgnaory stltuSltfajor EI~m~to oj bull Minmum requircnts for a luseCo mpetftlo Plan bull AC(Ilmmada10n priorities bull Commonmiddotu gar usase polldts bull -Itthod for Iculillng rental ratts for commonmiddotI5e saes

bull Developmg permiddot gat 5 monitonng polioSignljleant bull Making gar uage lMomatlon ava ilabl Alrport

bull Adoplng simIlar mlnmum ul llil~tlo n rlements ror mcumbent and newRupo u entrant carrier

Highlights oJ Ree Ad Rported by Individual Alrport5

UIesl newl~ ~StallCltl MultUsbullbull FlIghllramlalcn D1Spla~ SySt IMUlIDS) 10 Idenufy spac to ftll Ipecfic rquc$$ as LOY anse and to dee=e whICh

Anchorage pte are sb~ 0 recapture morgtal1On IS made tvallable PO ecut and on wcb sn RON polons are monllo-ed through ground handle

Monitors gate On a Ieritte basIS to rack ourhne compliance wuh preferential lense uulizauo requlrerneI lmpkrnert sharedmiddotuse proVlSlon reolop galeChcago se proce~ures Illd analy~e COnsrucuan phalmg and develop uullZallon Mdwav cnlaquo Also u ~ to ehedule alrport orvCe Iud as parking cuQda1 ServiceS coneenorbull Me ~eeuy

InSUltcd fO=a Cao Monltcrng =ci Reporting Procedure und~ auplces of Dallasmiddot a Cale MOnllc_~g Task Force ~ SUJpon of PlC COmpelltlve ac assurance

For Worth ug lIDSproduced onl hly ga acvm repons ane ngh actlvty epOrtl for sum~ ~y gare utlzauon aclMlr bv g~e e lemllnaL

~

middot~())t P~ fN~

gt[JUl

S1 ~ 1 1] ~rjodJol] ill Ull~1ll0~ 01 ~1igtn1 ~4l

~lI))t~d $=0J~

0 ~S~l renllj~PJd 5 0) gtt =d on relj~ = lJols Strt011tS tp III lJolt 1101111 ~ll 11110lt11 Jb~ oswpm iq pddn 011tllI01

l1jSU il PinpP ~~nOll olle~ltI gtld _1 llbull SJO)UOI~

J ~pO=O~~

O 1 Ol~ul re 00 ~JlPt )I H lS51) 0 npOJd OI1=OJ in~lJ We 0 SUCI OS 11 JomwW

1 ----C t~ JOJ stsil1rn on~Zln1 gtlc3 U01SS~O~

gtld

JlIlnq~ll

~tltiJtlP ~ tnll -sodmd 2tmffiII fa ptm Al~~d~ 11= fIc p 11 11q 01 f1llJpUlq gtno bullbull11 JO ltIOIl J1ll q lp~g fd

uw)p 01 1Isn ~ gtd JhO 0111--011UO li1fp lJod lJodbull 41UOW 01 1]= ssn PI llOll2lTtltl nd $uouwo~

-Ingt~p~d 0) ~gtOJd uO~J p Ot ~1I1 ~SlJ~O 0)

pl1llf1O JO ~sodnd JO middot~~cn ~~ nwmr-1 puu ~~ds)o llq11M ~Ill~)~P

ssq ip~ ~ ~Inp~l~ lqSlI d~ pTO oI= puc ~~~n ~leS SjOI01~

lOd~llUl~ 0) P~1I1pOu middot~~s ~ ~I~gtS 0 p~~~q tOld ~eS jJl

I P ~ 110 SlwulS~ ~rS io ogt 01 =1lo~d ~UU010tl) ~llI ~1~ ~ WYl

]~Ll UOllCjllr tl)W1U1W 1~11~1J ~Ul=p 0) ww5oJd SmJC1totJ ~~ ~o~ uo ltre 1lt1 PUE ~~UIIl ~~d sgtlmrnd~igt fgtj~ pue l1P ]10~a

~P~l~~ p llC 11 ~~~~d ~0lT ~1S () OJ 10d e P~ItLOl

Id S~US8 S ~lJl~ middotOl~ ~1 ~11 ~~n~~~ 0) ~o ~Jl ~l~l l bullu(]

S~~qm-l Sll ltll _OPUL I0ejme leg 1gt

) VI FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS bull ~taJor gtr of rev~nue for rminai proJen

MCljor EImntlt of bull tse of PFCs for gales and related trmm~l$ ICompetition PIn bull A va iabillty of dscreoiona ry income for ca pila mproemenl pro) I

Significant Airport bull Uing discretiona income for gate Oje1S

Responses

Highlights of Rec Actions Reported by Indi vidual Arpo-rs

Now Alrhne Operaung Agce~mem pe= on 10 raemiddotbae captal prOjects Anchocagc reqed a acco=odae new entra 0 e=ding mime nde cen

condittons

Ch1cago Pur6aed exdllsv - ll~ gate Wllh dic~tlOlru rund~ ad COl-ecld t to OmiddotHar COmmon use

VI AIRPORT CONTROLS OVER AIRSIDE AND GROUNDSJDE CAPACITY

bull MaJomymiddotin-inter (MJI) clauses covng proJ~ctgt rIajor Elementlt Of Competition Plan bull ProjectS delayed because Mll daubullbullbull rmiddotoked

bull Plans 0 modify e_ iting Ml I agree ment bull

Signifie

Ajr~1t bull Exempr mg ~apiraj projects neceary for wmpemion from ~J ales R~poes

IHighlightlt of R~e~nt Actio Reported by IdiVld1 Alrpo-rs middot

Ma conskc a 01 forceab le an WI ote agrun a d~v~Iopmcnl proJec for the gtuos bull bull of e dud CO mpellllon h h delopmenl project ESNasnU necessary for ~ oort to reee ts obligallor to prode acce on asoable te= a reqUIred bmiddot th e Al P a urace bull

Inter MIl clause tta e lde from MIl concUcrcrCe pro)ec to comply Provtdere with Federal (eqgtremes as pe= ng im port to COnstrUCt tern-unal raclin bullbull

ta ~hance comptHlon thOll Mil approval

) VI FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS bull ~taJor gtr of rev~nue for rminai proJen

MCljor EImntlt of bull tse of PFCs for gales and related trmm~l$ ICompetition PIn bull A va iabillty of dscreoiona ry income for ca pila mproemenl pro) I

Significant Airport bull Uing discretiona income for gate Oje1S

Responses

Highlights of Rec Actions Reported by Indi vidual Arpo-rs

Now Alrhne Operaung Agce~mem pe= on 10 raemiddotbae captal prOjects Anchocagc reqed a acco=odae new entra 0 e=ding mime nde cen

condittons

Ch1cago Pur6aed exdllsv - ll~ gate Wllh dic~tlOlru rund~ ad COl-ecld t to OmiddotHar COmmon use

VI AIRPORT CONTROLS OVER AIRSIDE AND GROUNDSJDE CAPACITY

bull MaJomymiddotin-inter (MJI) clauses covng proJ~ctgt rIajor Elementlt Of Competition Plan bull ProjectS delayed because Mll daubullbullbull rmiddotoked

bull Plans 0 modify e_ iting Ml I agree ment bull

Signifie

Ajr~1t bull Exempr mg ~apiraj projects neceary for wmpemion from ~J ales R~poes

IHighlightlt of R~e~nt Actio Reported by IdiVld1 Alrpo-rs middot

Ma conskc a 01 forceab le an WI ote agrun a d~v~Iopmcnl proJec for the gtuos bull bull of e dud CO mpellllon h h delopmenl project ESNasnU necessary for ~ oort to reee ts obligallor to prode acce on asoable te= a reqUIred bmiddot th e Al P a urace bull

Inter MIl clause tta e lde from MIl concUcrcrCe pro)ec to comply Provtdere with Federal (eqgtremes as pe= ng im port to COnstrUCt tern-unal raclin bullbull

ta ~hance comptHlon thOll Mil approval

VIII AIRPORT INTENTIONS TO BUILD OR ACQUIRE GATES -TO BE US EO AS COMMON FACILITIES

- I

bull Common-usc sate aVamp1lable bull Common-use gates l~h e ~llled to be bu l

trlajor EImnU of - lmemational gata available for domes uu Cmptition Plan bull F~ differences bgtwffn lnternaon l gae 5e ior QcmeSC rlee and

domeslaquo sates bull Carrier hatIU on commonmiddotuse gatgt

SgnfjfeltUlt bull Uul1ng rusercuenal ulCOme 10 a comonmiddotue gaelArpolt

bull Adopllng cOlmon-use gate reu ccn~arable to fee chuged cc leaseholdRespolUes

Highlights of Recent ActoIU RCpOTUd I Indvid1 Airports

Converted [0 xcluSlve 10 shortmiddotte= prefere~r Ilub)c(Ie recapturel andAnchorage common-use gae bull

Recapued a tOran exclulvemiddotu gate lor prcfcrenw u5c an convenedAtlanta

one undee pre[eenurJmiddotlse gle to a co-on-use pte

intalling c==on use temILnaJ cqp ICt E) m ili COmmonmiddot gatcS to aWl enhanced 1Ie abllitY of aulines to slare galC an hold rooms thenJy

tncreuing airport capaCtty

Chtcago Convened exclusiv~ middotuse gate te como USOHare

Adop ted gtfOuXel for common use glle gtnormes gIVen for (al usc by e)Osung Clrec tha t docs not lease a gale (bl a neW entralt and tel an carne

- CIand sedung 10 expad would apply thtS protocol as neeted 10 exclUSIve-Use ampales Three ampates conmiddotee~ to cOmgton use cone e pte lelao passed by-Cay gate prog-= nanamplemet conl~c( dlOed prctocoJ adoped

Use ClITE system at all ucke t COUnle IAH has constructet coon-Housten Illeprefererttilmiddotloc gates HOU has comn -ue gates and t dvelop a

Hohbylntermiddot Ilana~ fee ior an) COmmOn gate useo charge separately fer gate usc Itckel conuncral cOU nter and Common factlity usco cltrate cenluston cembne per urn

atesl middot

Hu eve cemon-ue gates Iable for uu camiddotneli (llrlOrt will Nash1Ue negotlat middotaea gae recaplure upen reqlest

is develop a co_on ule phlosophmiddot for the dUl~ of new and renovated paneng te=lil fac~uel nclultt~gte u of plasma ptbull gncally lZed

Sa Jose gatU to fttate sharamp an ttlnted data ~ tem stmtlar 10 ClITE II to bo Installed at ucO cOners anI a p)C and a Shared baggage screenng lyStem

IX ARFARE LEVELS AS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE AIRPORTS I

bull Caer loclll pa bullbullenger weraic fare arket hare alc vcrage Majo~ Em stlU of

passeg Inp-Ienglt da ta Complaquotfon Plan bull Dal3 above compaled 10 oter onbull

Significan t Ibull US1ni fa data to Uusrra comgtc sgthAirpo rt bull Ulng ah hal data 10 atael new Sen1Ce Rnporufl~

High1ighu of Rflc t Alttioru Reported by Itldlvld ual Alrporu

ChIcago Ui fare data aee]gt track OHare ccrr~ct v e poJIlen eeiI 1o olhe OHae mllrkel

Us~g market sbare data to hamphgh arke OlPOflll oe nc andPalm Beach InCUmb=1 carc_

30 AoM Published Compelmcn Plan including rralkelmiddot harc data 0 eb page